Upload
derick-wooldridge
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
Greener Pastures
PART TWO– GETTING THE MOST OUT OF YOUR PASTURES
Speaker NameSpeaker Title Speaker Affiliation
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
▪ Goals▪ Animal Production▪ Forage Production▪ Environmental Management▪ Social Balance▪ Economics▪ More Resources
AGENDA
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
▪ Gain understanding of sustainability
▪ Understand the balance of animal and plant growth
▪ Understand your personal, social, land and financial considerations for grazing
OUR GOALS: YOU WILL…
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
▪ Make enough to work only on farm?
▪ Make enough to cover expenses?
▪ Supply habitat for song birds?
▪ Raise your kids on a farm?
WHAT ARE YOUR GOALS?
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
WHAT IS SUSTAINABILITY
Planet People Profit
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
▪ Raise the best animals you can as efficiently as you can
▪ Genetics▪ Meat and/or milk quality▪ Measuring growth▪ Calculate forage needs▪ Additional topics
ANIMAL PRODUCTION
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
▪ Frame size and shape▪ Mothering ability▪ Temperament▪ Winter hardiness▪ Rate of Gain▪ Time to finish▪ Meat/milk quality, quantity
and flavor▪ Longevity▪ Interest in foraging
▪ Multiple offspring per ewe pregnancy
ANIMAL SELECTION - GENETICS
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
Increases Quality
▪ Good Genetics▪ Fast growth▪ Marbling▪ Low animal stress
Decreases Quality
▪ Poor Genetics▪ Slow growth▪ Leanness▪ High animal stress
MEAT QUALITY AND GRAZING‘Quality’ = good eating, tender and juicy, flavorful
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
Increases Quality
▪ Genetics▪ Balanced energy and
protein diet▪ Animal comfort
Decreases Quality
▪ Genetics▪ Low energy and
protein diet▪ High animal stress
MILK QUALITY AND GRAZING
‘Quality’ = protein and fat content, low somatic cell count
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
Increases Quantity
▪ Genetics▪ Optimal energy and
protein diet▪ High foraging interest▪ Animal comfort
Decreases Quantity
▪ Genetics▪ Low energy and
protein diet▪ Low foraging interest▪ High animal stress
MILK QUANTITY AND GRAZING
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
Rate of Gain
▪ Weight gain / time▪ Average daily gain
(ADG)
Example : Finishing
MEASURING ANIMAL GROWTH
▪ Day 1 = 400 lbs▪ Day 150 = 750 lb▪ 750 - 400 lbs = 350▪ 350 lbs /150 d = ▪ ADG= __2.33_
lbs/day
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
EXAMPLE 2▪ Goal : sell by 18 mo at 1100 lb, born 65 lbs▪ 1100-65 lb = 1035 = ADG = 1.9 lbs/day
18*30 days = 540▪ Actual: Ready in 24 mo▪ 1100 – 65 =1035 = ADG = 1.4
24*30 days = 720
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
▪ Determine forage needs▪ Calculate forage available▪ Forage stand assessment▪ Forage species selection▪ Establishing / renovating
pastures▪ Pasture rotation▪ Winter feeding
FORAGE PRODUCTION
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
CALCULATE FORAGE NEEDS▪ % body weight used daily
– Eaten : 2.5%– Trampled: 1-1.5%
Example:– 10 cows + 3mo old calves = 13 AU = 13,000 lbs– 13,000 x 4% = 520 lbs of DM forage needed daily– 15% dry matter content of lush pasture – 520/0.15= 3,467 lbs as fed pasture
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
FORAGE QUALITY NEEDS▪ What do we mean by forage quality?
– Nutritional content: protein, fiber, vitamins and minerals
– Maturity when grazed or harvested– For hay or silage : weeds, mold, toxins, dust,
trash
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
▪ Maturation cycle (recurring):• Vegetative• Bud (boot)• Bloom (flower, anthesis)• Seed
▪ As plants mature:• Leaf proportion declines• Stems become less nutritious• Fiber concentration increases; energy and intake potential
decrease, protein decreases.
▪ Maturity is greatest determinant of nutritional value!
FORAGE QUALITY NEEDS
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
FORAGE QUALITY NEEDS
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
▪ Species composition▪ Plant diversity▪ Plant density▪ Plant vigor▪ Legume content▪ Plant residue▪ Uniformity of use▪ Severity of use
FORAGE STAND ASSESSMENTS▪ Woody canopy▪ Soil erosion
Forage Species SelectionGrasses
Regrowth Potential
Legume Compatibility
Winter Hardiness
Ease of Establishment
Drough Tolerance
Flooding Tolerance
Species Persistence
Cool Season Grasses Italian Ryegrass Excellent Fair Poor Excellent Fair Fair PoorKentucky Bluegrass Good Poor Excellent Good Fair Fair GoodOrchardgrass Excellent Poor Good Good Fair Fair GoodPerennial Ryegrass Excellent Fair Poor Excellent Fair Fair PoorQuackgrass Excellent Good Excellent N/A Good Fair ExcellentReed Canarygrass Good Poor Excellent Poor Good Excellent ExcellentSmooth Bromegrass Fair Good Excellent Good Fair Fair GoodTall Fescue Excellent Good Fair Excellent Fair Fair FairTimothy Fair Good Excellent Good Poor Poor Poor
Warm Season Grasses Indiangrass Good Poor Good Poor Excellent Good ExcellentBig Bluestem Good Poor Good Poor Excellent Poor GoodSorghum/Sudan Good Poor N/A Excellent Excellent Fair N/ASwitchgrass Good Poor Good Poor Excellent Poor Good
LegumesRegrowth Potential
Bloat Problems
Winter Hardiness
Ease of Establishment
Drough Tolerance
Flooding Tolerance
Species Persistence
Alfalfa Good Yes Excellent Good Good Poor GoodAlsike Poor Yes Good Excellent Poor Good PoorBirdsfoot Trefoil Fair No Excellent Poor Poor Fair ExcellentKura Clover Excellent Yes Excellent Poor Good Fair ExcellentLadino Poor Yes Good Excellent Poor Good PoorRed Clover Fair Yes Good Excellent Poor Fair FairWhite Clover Good Yes Excellent Excellent Good Fair ExcellentWinter hardiness assumes adapted varieties are used. Source: “Pastures for Profit: A Guide to Rotational Grazing.” 2002. University of Wisconsin (A3529) and University of Minnesota Extension Service publication FO-06145.
Source: “Improving Pasture Productivity: Pasture Establishment and Species Selection”, Cosgrove, Dennis. Extension Forage Specialist, University of Wisconsin, River Falls
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
Why?
▪ Increase productivity– Add species/diversity– Fill in bare/thin areas
How?
▪ No till drill – the drill does the tilling in a narrow band in front of the seed placement
▪ Frost seeding – works best with legumes– Clover– Alfalfa
RENOVATING PASTURES
When?SpringSummer Fall
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
Stocking rate
▪ The number of animals or animal units on a set amount of acres, usually the whole farm total.
Stocking density
▪ The number of animals, animal units or pounds of live animal on a set paddock size.
HOW INTENSE IS YOUR PASTURE?
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
Rate = 5 AU/ac
Density = 5 AU/ac
Rate = 5 AU/ac
Density = 20 AU/ac
STOCKING RATE VS DENSITY
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
▪ 2 ac per Animal Unit▪ 1 Animal Unit = 1000 lb
– 1 beef cow– 5 - 200 lb ewes– 2 - 500 lb steers
▪ Varies with:– Weather– Soils– Management intensity
WHAT RATE SHOULD I PLAN FOR?
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
CONTINUOUS VS ROTATIONAL GRAZING
▪ Animals go back to their favorites if they have a choice
▪ Divide the pasture into smaller paddocks▪ Move animal into paddocks as the grass is
ready▪ Adjust stocking density
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
Good pasture
▪ 300 lb /ac/ in▪ 5 ac, graze from 8”
down to 4”= 4” of grass▪ 5ac x 4” x 300 = 6000
lbs available forage▪ 6000/3500 lbs needed
daily = 1.71 days in that pasture
CALCULATING AVAILABLE FORAGE
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
How long can we leave them on that pasture?
▪ 6000/3500 = 1.71 days in that acre of pasture
What if the paddock is smaller ?
▪ If half the size, them we have to move them twice as often
▪ This is the basic principle of rotational grazing
▪ It becomes more intensive the more often we have to move the cattle
CALCULATING GRAZING TIME
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
What if the paddock is smaller ?
▪ If half the size, them we have to move them twice as often
▪ This is the basic principle of rotational grazing
▪ It becomes more intensive the more often we have to move the cattle
CALCULATING GRAZING TIME
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
HOW INTENSELY DO YOU WANT TO MANAGE YOUR PASTURES?
• Less labor needed• Less attention needed• Less risky• Fewer animals per acre
• More labor needed• Must pay close attention • Risk of damaging
pasture greater• More animals per acre
Less intenseMore intense
Paddock 13.5 ac
Paddock 24 ac
Paddock 32.5 ac
1 ac sacrifice area
Neighbors 5 ac
Corral and barn
Draw Your Property
*Add paddock size!
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
DRAW YOUR PROPERTY▪ Include items like these▪ Also write down current
management practices– How often you rotate pastures– Mowing weeds– Harrowing– Fertilizing– etc
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
ANIMAL INVENTORY AND FORAGE REQUIREMENTS
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
FORAGE INVENTORY AND BALANCING WITH REQUIREMENTS
Available forage
Forage needs
Net
Paddock 1
4 inches plant growth
(250 lbs /ac/inch) (3.5 ac)
= 3500
=
12 days
8 horses(900 lbs each)
(0.04% utilization) 288
Paddock 2
4 inches plant growth
(250 lbs /ac/inch) (4 ac)
= 4000
=
13.8 days
8 horses(900 lbs each)
(0.04% utilization) 288
Paddock 3
4 inches plant growth
(250 lbs /ac/inch) (2.5 ac)
= 2500
=
6.9 days
8 horses(900 lbs each)
(0.04% utilization) 288
Neighbors
4 inches plant growth
(125 lbs /ac/inch) (5 ac)
= 2500
=
6.9 days
8 horses(900 lbs each)
(0.04% utilization) 288
Est
imat
e D
ays
per
Pad
dock
Paddock 13.5 ac
Paddock 2 4 ac
Paddock 3 2.5 ac
1 ac
Neighbors 5 ac
Week 1
Week 2
Week 3
Week 4
Week 5
Week 6Week 7
Week 8Week 9
Week 10
Week 11
Week 12
Week 13
Week 14
Week 15
Week 16
Week 17Week 18
Week 19
Week 20
Rotation MonthGrazing
Week Paddock
amount (inches) grazed
estimated tonnage grazed
1
May 1 3 5 3125
2 1 6 5250
3 2 6 6000
4 4 4 2500
2
June 5 3 5 3125
6 1 4 3500
7 1 4 3500
8 2 4 4000
July 9 2 4 4000
10 4 4 2500
3
11 3 4 2500
12 1 6 5250
August 13 2 6 6000
14 4 4 2500
4
15 3 4 2500
September 16 1 4 3500
17 2 4 4000
18 2 4 4000
19 4 4 2500
5 20 1 4 3500
73750
Time to move
▪ Cows can go in a paddock when…– Good forage growth of
8 to 12 inches– Forages had adequate
rest period
Complicating factors:• Weather
– Drought– Cold – Heat
• Multiple herds• Too many animals• Lack of labor• Lack of attention
Time to move
▪ Horses and sheep can go in a paddock when…– Good forage growth of
4 to 6 inches– Forages had adequate
rest period
Complicating factors:• Weather
– Drought– Cold – Heat
• Multiple herds• Too many animals• Lack of labor• Lack of attention• Overweight horses
Be Flexible
▪ Watch and see how it goes▪ Be willing to change fencing arrangement and
grazing time▪ Use temporary fencing for divisions at first▪ Pull them off when its time▪ It’s a plan, not the law. Make a plan, get as
close as you can, but it ok if you don’t get there right away.
Be Observant
▪ Have we had enough rain?▪ What stage of growth are the plants in?▪ Seed heads forming? That reduces quality.▪ Are there weeds getting out of control?▪ How are the horses grazing it? Sit and watch▪ How tall is the grass?▪ Has it regrown since the last grazing?▪ Good dark green color to forages?
Write it down!
▪ How long you expect to graze each paddock?
▪ How long were they actually in each paddock?
▪ Communication is critical! Make sure your team knows the plan.
End of the season
▪ Are you going to pull them off pastures for the winter?
▪ Open up all gates when things freeze up?
▪ Keep them off muddy and frosty pastures
▪ Sacrifice area
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
Make a plan
▪ What do I need to know?– Number of animals– Animal requirements– Pasture available– Number of paddocks
needed
Manage your plan– Adjust due to season,
moisture, species– Adjust by changing
animal numbers, paddock size, harvest of excess, supplemental feeding
ACTIVITY- PASTURE PLAN
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
What, when, why?
▪ Plan for it!▪ Budget for it!
▪ Grass bales▪ Baleage▪ Corn stalks▪ Grain
Round bale feeding
WINTER FEEDING
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
▪ Prevent polluting – Nutrients – manure, fertilizer, septic, etc– Chemicals- fuel, etc
▪ Careful use of pesticides▪ Minimize erosion▪ Vegetative buffers for lakes,
streams, wetlands▪ Increase biodiversity – native plantings▪ Manage invasive species
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
▪ Organic cert or no?▪ Selling whole, live
animal and done?▪ Direct sales?
– Distance to butcher– Butcher’s schedule and
fees– Available storage?– Transportation options?
OFF TO MARKET
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
▪ Recordkeeping▪ Cost of production▪ Desired income▪ Savings▪ Determine a cost of gain or cost per unit of
milk produced – most difficult thing to do accurately.
▪ Start with the end in mind
ECONOMICS
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
Animal costs
▪ Feed – pasture, hay, grain, minerals, vitamins
▪ Veterinary▪ Purchase costs?▪ Processing and
marketing▪ Labor?
Facility costs
▪ Fencing▪ Shelter▪ Land▪ Housing▪ Vehicles?▪ Utilities▪ DIRTI - overhead
ACTIVITY – PRODUCTION COSTS
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
Am I going in the right direction?
▪ Economically – is this sustainable?
▪ What adjustments need to be made?
▪ What adjustment can be made?
Is it working how I thought it would?
▪ Is my quality of life what I wanted to be?
▪ What is my stress level?
ACTIVITY- AM I MAKING $?
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
▪ Am I a good neighbor?
▪ Is the work environment of my farm better now than when I started?
▪ Does my farm support other local businesses?
SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
ENTERPRISE BUDGETS▪ Income▪ Expenses▪ Analysis
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
Environment
SocialEconomics
Pick a scenario and decide what action you would take.
What impact would that action have on each of these aspects of sustainability?
ACTIVITY – BALANCE SUSTAINABILITY
• Spiritual/Faith• Purpose• Ethics +
values
• Controlling our Destiny
• Dealing with Change
• Family• Leisure• Rest
• Healthy• Functional• Effective
Commun-ication
Time
Harmony
Direction
Quality of Life
Success is how you measure it!
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
▪ County’s Soil and Water Conservation District – phone book
▪ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service in your county – phone book
▪ U of M Extension - www.extension.umn.edu
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this PowerPoint is available in alternative formats upon request. Direct requests to the Extension Store at 800-876-8636.
Thank You
Questions?This product was developed with support from the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) program, which is funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture — National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA-NIFA). Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed within do not necessarily reflect the view of the SARE program or the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.