)2512 15-15(

-

1135/ 2512

1

:

.

. :

- .

-

: .

: musR etrop ehcrehcer ed liavart ec snad snoretnesrp suon euq esylanaL let nU .noitasinagrol ed eiroht al rus non te snoitasinagro sed seiroht sel rus euqiroht sproc ed sap etsixe'n li rac ,rbild tnemelag tse etsilarulp xiohc uA .noitseg ed eiroht enu'd relrap essiup no'uq ruop ifinu tnemmasiffus seiroht ed elbmesne nu'd noitatibahoc enu etsissa no ,eriartnoc ed evler seiroht sec ed evitsuahxe noitatnesrp enu eriaf .setnerrucnoc ec snaD .essehcir ruel te tisrevid ruel ednarg tse tnat ,eruegag elbissopmi'l :noitseg ed seiroht ed stnaruoc xued resylana snolla suon liavart

2

- Les diffrentes thories non conomiques qui analysent le phnomne organisationnel et comportemental des organisations elles sont fondes sur les recherches en gestion en psychologie et en sociologie.

- Les thories conomiques qui sont souvent ngliges et qui sont actuellement en pleine expansion

Lanalyse expliquera si lvolution des thories du management est marque par des contrastes ou par la diversit et la complmentarit elle nous claircira aussi sur la pertinence des thories des organisations la lumire des changements devenus les caractristiques de l'environnement.

Mots cls : thorie classique gestion, mouvement des relations humaines, la thorie de contingence, la thorie behavioriste, la thorie des couts de transaction, la thorie de lagence

3

" "

.

. .

....

.

...

.

: . I

.

.

4

.

.

.

.

.

.

: .5. I " rolyaT kcirederF" " " " loyaF irneH" " "

.

"" . "" .

]5[ )tso ( " "

.

.

. .

. ) tnemeganam( " "

5

" kciwrU , kciluG" " " .]2[ . " kciwrU , kciluG "

"" B.R.O.C.D.S.O.P

. " " ) ( " "

.

.]1[ " " " "

enailiL" " " " ttnaG yrneH" " " "egabbaB selrahC " . hterbliG

.

.

.

.

6

.]3[ 11.6 16.6 59 16

"" " "

"" " "

.

:

-

TIJ -

- -

-

.

7

...

.

. ) X (

" ssalguoD rogerG cM" " " " .

.

. .]1[ .

: .2 . I .

. . " "

.

. .

... .

.

8

. .

.]6[

" " .

. ) ( ) (

.

.

.

. .

.

.]1[ " " " . " sirygrA sirhC" " " " " " trekiL sisneR" "

" " .

.

9

. .

.

.

. ]8[ " . A wolsaM" " " " "

x

.

" "

y

.]9[ " grebzreH kcirederF" " "

.]15[ " "

....

01

" " .

.

.

.]55[

..... " noitasilaudividnI"

.]25[

.

.

.

.

: .1.I

" kcinzleS " " " . "snosraP " ""

.

" snosrap "

11

. .

.

.

. " worrep " " , kcinezles "

" snosrap " :

.

.

.

: .3. I.

" " " " renualB " " tsirT yremE " " etutitsnI kcotsivaT" drawdooW" " " .

.

. 116 ]31[

.

21

. .

.]41[

" snruB . T " " " "reklatS .M. G " " "

9 .

.

.]51[

" hcsroL ,ecnerwaL " " "

. .....

. :

.

31

.

" "

....

. .]61[

.

.

" yaw tseb eno " " "

.

.

41

: . II

.

: .5 . II " htimS madA " "

* .

.

. ]71[.

.

.

. . ]81[

. " esaoc. R " " . " "

"" " 1956

"

.

51

.

.]91[ ""

. ) (

gnicifsitas noitazamixam

.

. ]02[.

" snaeM , elreB" " "

. " lomuaB " " " .

" nosmailliW" " " " sirraM" " " " "

.

. /

.

. " " " nosmailliW " " " """ sirraM"

61

. .

" " . " " . ]12[ " htiarblaG"

esnepxe" " " " secnerfrp

.

.]22[.

.

.

.

: .2. II " hcraM, treyC" " "

.

" nomiS. H" " " . ) )gnicifsitas

. .]32[

. .

. .

.

71

" " .....

. . .

.

" " " "

.

.

.]42[

" nietsnebieL" "" ""

9156 ) X( ]52[:

-

. .

- .

81

.

.

...... " noitilaoc " " "

:) ( .1.II " "

" nosmailliw reivilo" " "

" " "" " eaoC" ""

." reldnahC" " " " worrA" " " "nomiS" " " " snommoC" " "

. .

" "

.

. .

" " .

91

.

.

]62[

. .

) mrof U( )U( . ) mrof M(

. ) ( )M(

)U( .

.

. .

. )mrof M (

. .

. )ffats(

02

)M( .]72[ " "

" "

"" . .

.

. " "

.

.

: .3.II

" " "ntoburuF" " " " ztesmeD" "" " naihclA" " " " : " hcivojeP " ." hcivojeP"

]82[ " . :

.

. .

.

12

. :

. .

.]92[

" " ) ( " gnilkceM ,nesneJ"

]03[. "

.

.

) ( .

. )eirtemysA(

. .

.]13[

.

]23[:

22

-

-

.

]33[: . serutidnepxe gnirotinom -

serutidnepxe gnidnob -

......) ( tsol laudiser -

. .

)S( .

)R( )R+S (- :

)W(

) *R( O -*R+ W = P .

)O( ) *R( ) *R(

)O( ) *R( )R( )S( ) R( . ) S( .

32

-6

R -2

S Sd, Rd -9

-6 *R xam

-2 O

Od , *Rd -9

.

. .

.]43[

.

. .

. .

.

.

. .

.

42

.

.

. " naihclA , ztesmeD" " "

" " " " .

" " ellerutan noitcels al "" " " nesneJ ,amaF" " "

. .

.......

.

. .

.

.

.

52

.

" "

.

.

62

:

.

.

.

.

" esaoC. R" " "

. " "

" " .

" " " " . x

" nosmailliw .o"" " ""

72

. .

.

. ...

28

: 1- Henry Fayol, Administration industrielle et gnrale, paris, dunod,1918,

pp ,19-49 2- Jean Claude Scheid, Les grands auteurs en organisation , paris, dunod,

pp, 85-89 3- Carol Kennedy, Toutes les thories du management : les ides

essentielles, des auteurs les plus souvent cits, 3 ed , paris, maxima, 2002, pp,329 - 333

4- Grard charreaux ,jean pierre pitol belin, les thories des organisations,5 http//www.pagesperso-orange.fr/perso/arlicles/theorga87.pdf.

21/1/2162 61:11 5- Ibid, 6,7 6- Siegel , Lane, Personnel and organizational psychology, Ontario, Richard

d . Irwin, 1982, p, 272,273 7- Jean Claude Scheid, op., cit., p p, 178 183 8- Franois Lemieux, thorie de lorganisation, p, 3

www.cours.polymtl.ca/inf3300/Cours/TheoriesOrganisation.pdf 22/11/2162 62:91

9- Roger Aim, Lessentiel de la thorie des organisations,4 Edition, Gualino , Paris,2010, p ,55,56

10- Ibid., p,53-55

11- Chris Argiris, personality and organisation, Harper, Newyork,1957,p,58

www. Cours polymtl.ca/inf3300/thoriesorganisation.pdf 21/1/2162 66:69

62- : 2166 91 96

29

69 - Joan Woodward,Management and Technology, HMSO, 1958, p, 18

62-

2112 15-56 69- Roger Aim,op,cit,p, 95 61- Coriat B ,Weinstein O, Les nouvelles thories de lentreprise, 1995, pp, 2-66

*

.

61- Ibid, p, 12 61- Hubert Gabri , Jean Louis Jaquier, La thorie moderne de lentreprise : lapproche institutionnelle, europe media duplication s.a, Lassay les chteaux,2001, p, 37 65- Grard charreaux ,jean pierre pitol belin, op,cit, p,15 21- Galbraith J .K., Le nouvel etat industriel , 4eme Ed,1967, p, 473 26- William J. Baumol,Economic theory and operation analysis, 3th edition, Prentice Hall international edition, London, 1999,p,323 22- Yves Frederick Livian, Introduction lanalyse des organisations, 2eme dition, STDI, Lassay les chteaux,2001, pp, 58-61 29- Grard charreaux ,jean pierre pitol belin, op,cit, p,18,19 22- Coriat B ,Weinstein O, op, cit, p,12 29- Hubert Gabri , Jean Louis Jaquier,op, cit, pp, 144-149 21- O.E. Williamson, Reflections on the new insttitutional economics , journal of institutional and theoritical economics, 1985, p, 187 21- Grard charreaux ,jean pierre pitol belin, op,cit, p, 24 21- Ibid,p, 24

30

25- Jensen m, mecking w ,theory of the firm : managerial behavior, agency costs and capital structure, journal of financial economics, 1976, spring, p, 308 91- Ibid, p, 308 96- Coriat B , Weinstein O. , op,cit, p,55,56 92- Ibid,p,94 99- Fama E, Agency problems and the theory of the firm, Journal of political economy,vol,88, N 2, Avril, 1980 32- www.webssa.net/files/cours_1-la_theoriedelagence pdf

21/11/2162 5:91