A 7

s 1

APPLICANT:

. :_, ... ~·~~ '~~;-~~/~:·;;~y~~~:4;}t~li}i~~!?'tF:t.~r /;

CALENDAR ITEM

13 10/26/89 W 24256 PRC 7354 J. Ludlow

APPROVAL OF A RECREATIONAL PIER PERMIT

Moana Beach Property Owners Association, Inc. P.O. Box 109 Homewood, ~alifornia 9S718

AREA, TYPE LAND AND LOCATION: A submerged parcel of land located in McKinney

LAND USE:

Bay, take Tahoe, Placer County.

Partial reconstruction of and a 30~foot extension to an existing multi-use pier.

TERMS OF PROPOSED PERMIT: Five-years beginning October 26 1989.

Initial period:

CONSIDERATION: Rent-free, pursuant to Section 6S03.S of the P.R.C.

BASIS FOR CONSIDERATION: Pursuant to 2 Cal. Code Regs. 2003.

APPLICANT STATUS: Applicant is owner of upland.

PREREQUISITE CONDITIONS, FEES AND EXPENSF.S: Fil~ng fee and processing costs have been received.

-1-

-::: ..... _ ..... , ,_,-~.f~k•. "',.. ·--:..-<- - ~~""")-"'~ .,;;.-... -:; ... -..:..; .. ,-.....,,,... ,~i:;:-. ~-)' ,,.~~,,,.__.._··;._;.-; "•' .... ---··-....... - .............. '..:::" .. -· ......... ::~· ·:-:·: "."'. :" :· -::·;;~~':i/. -; y~:_~~:;:~;~~:y·,y~~~~~:;,~-;,;f ;i'jT~~~~,~:}/ .·- - · · ·:

::. '

CALEr!JDAR ITEM NO. 13 (CONT'Dl

STATUTORY AND OTHER REFERENCES: A. P.R.C.: Div. 6, Parts 1 and 2; Div. 13.

8. Cal. Code Regs.: Title 2, Div. 3; Title 14, Div. 6.

AB 864: 11/13/89.

OTHER PERT1NENT INFORMATJ:ON: 1. Pursuant to the Commission's delegation of

authority and the State CEQA Guidelj.nes (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15025), the staft has prepared a Proposed Negative Declaration identified as EIR ND 462, State Clearinghouse No. 89030601. Such Proposed Negative Decla~ation was prepared and circulated for public review pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.

Based upon the Initial Study, the Proposad Negative Declaration, and the comments received in response thereto, there is no s••bstantial evidence that the project will. h.· ea significant effect on the environment. (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15074(b)}

2. This activity involves lands identified as possessing significant environmental values pursuant to P.R.C. 6370, et seq. Based upon the staff's consultation with the persons nominating such lands and through the CEQA review process~ it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is consistent with its use classification.

3. The Applicant has revised the applicati-on to include orly the partial reconstruction and extension of the existing pier. All work will be conducted waterward of the 6,223-foot low water line and will be accomplished from a barge with a pile driver. All construction wastes will be collected onto the barge and disposed of at the nearest dumpster/sanitary landfill site.

-2-

CALEf~DAff PAGE

--~ .. ~.:: -:, - .. ' ,,. '; .. ~

CALENDAR ITEM NO. 13 (CONT'D}

4. Materials will be neither stored nor placed above the low waterline of the subject. property. This procedure will prevent any disturbance to what may be considered a Tahoe Yellow Cress (Rorippa) habitat.

S. The proposed project has been reviewed under the consultation process e~tablished between the Commission and the Do~artment of Fish and Game. pursuant to the provisions of the California Enda~gered Species Act (CESA), and it has been determined that the project, as described herein. poses no jeopardy to the Tahoe Yellow Crass (Rorripa) or its habitat.

6. In order to determine the other potential trust uses in the area of the proposed project. the staff contacted representatives of the following agencies: fRPA., Department of Fish and Game, County of Placer, and the Tahoe Conservancy. None of these agencies expressed a concern that the proposed project would have a significant effect on trust uses in the area. The agencies did not identify any trust needs which were not being met by existing facilities in the area. Identified trust uses in this area would include swimming, boating, walking along the beach, and views of the lake.

This property was physically inspected by staff for purposes of evaluating the impact on the pyblic trust.

7. All permits issued at lake Tahoe include special language in which the permittee/lessee "qrees to protect and rsplace or restore, if required, the habitat of Rorippa subumbellata, commonly called the Tahoe Yellow Cress, a State-listed endangered plant species.

-3-

CALENDAR P.~G~

MINUTG JIAGE

, 62

CALENDAR ITEM CIJO. 1 3 CCOt'1T 1 0)

8. All applicants at Lake Tahoe will be notified that the public has a.right to pass along the shoreline and the permittee must provide a reasonable means For public passage along the shorezone area occupied by the permitted structure.

9. All permits covering structures in Lake Tahoe will include a condition subsequent that if any structure authoriz~d is found to be in nonconformance with the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency's shorezone ordinance and if any alterations, repairs, or removal required pursuant to said ~rdinance are not accomplished withi~ the designated time period, then the permit will be automatically t~rmi~ated, effective upon notice by the State, and the site shall be cleared pursuant to the terms thereof.

APPROVALS OBTAINED:

Department1

.otf Cfisht an1

d8

Gamde, Pllahontacn Retgionald . ~ Water Qua 1 y on ro oar , acer oun y, an ~ Tahoe Regional Planning Agency.

FURTHER APPROVALS REQUIRED:

EXHIBITS:

United States Army Corps of Engineers.

A. Land Description. B. Location Map. c. Placer County Letter of Approval. D. Negative Declaration.

IT rs RECOMMENDED THAT THE COMMISSION:

1. CERTIFY THAT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION, EIR ND 462, STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 89030601 WAS PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CEQA AND THAT THE COMMISSION HAS REVIEWED ANO CONSIDERED THE INFORMATION CONTAINED THEREIN.

2. DETERMINE THAT THE PROJECT, AS APPROVED, WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT ..

-4-

63

;~~~!:·' ': ~:::<::-~;:; ~:)(>: ::~~>~~~ --~~--'' .

3.

' CAL:ENDAR. ITEM NO. 13 {CONT 1 D)

,.

AUTHORIZE ISSUANCE TO MOANA BEACH PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. OF A FIVE-YEAR RECREATIONAL PIER PERMIT, BEGINNING OCTOBER 26, 1989; FOR THE PARTIAL RECONSTRUCTION OF AND A 30-FOOT EXTENSION TO AN EXISTING MULTI-USE PIER ON THE LAND DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED AND BY REFE~ENC~ MADE A PART HEREOF.

-5-

CALE~t;>AR PAGE

· MINt!lE PAGE

···-·~:-~~~i~:;:·~ .. ·~ :·~··"~c:;-·.·•·,'~''"':~;~;~';'.J'tt~?:~?rt~/?!~·· ~ ~'':',., . ' '_..:...

Prepared by Jutly LAND DESCRIPTION Ludlow on 9./2T/'b9 EXHIBIT "A"

FLAN ---I I

- ~ '

l~~~t c-~~ t=I-. ~~o

r fl }= __:____ ' ~ -- J;(/./JY~7. I . ·~ ····~ -. -· .. ~~ ......... :·:·:·" . : ~

i , ~ ... ~: .. ~ .... .... -:.c:bo? ••• - •

lvlJ.W

••• ....,.,.. ..• ·~'/'7'~ - .·.:~.· ... ·:kl!'t~o.r

A 'I

T 16N

{~;;.f··~-~ - ~.

~· 11.U '°· ,... - -

w w

\() " a:: a: .

&:nnyslda

TISN

--------"""!"-----..----..... EXHIBIT '8' w 24256

-'-.¥::-~~·~-,;.:.~~'"I~~""·_~_~~~·~ ....... ~ fliO~:: , ... ....._,.,, ···~~'"""' :~~ ,-,~ " - ~-...- .... ~ - <-< ~ ___ f~:~~p ~ ..

:"·<<" . .,, ... . : .... :;.r.::·~-::· ·;\: !:~:~~?::r:~:~~~~'.~~J:~f~:::t-ff'·~;· -

•

l.al<e Forest

\

TIJN

m.wu;w

u.: a:>

a; a:

, • ,.. , .:.-;.· .: >_ 'V

d==c 11 v.&::;i?JUU a1sp•

·.\

~lb ~

T IJN ,.

T 12 N

C.41.ENDAR PAGE

MIN~TEP~GE

ILi O>

~~

66 373~J

''.'.~~f ~j~i;~~!i ~~Ji;"::;,:~~::;;:·. ""';r '''. . ..

'..w 24256

PLACER COUNTY

';''===DE= .. P=A=R=T=M=EN=T=· O=F=P=U=B=L=IC=W=O=RK='=,

-OP(11ATING OlVISIOI<

Adir'fhnts1ra110.-ii

E"9',......"'9 £qu.p.'N'ftt t.l...,tf'NllCe

Roa.ct......_""'tf'nlnc& $pf<ozl [MthCIS

S..•....,.tf!I Tr~auary 6, 1989

Judy Ludlov St~~te Lands Commission 18U7-13th Street Sacramento, cA 95814

RE: PIER/SHORE ZONE COUSTRUCTION

JACK WARREN. Director JAN WITTi:R. Assistant Director LARRY 0000, Deputy Director

ALAN ROY, Deputy Director

The County of ~~.;:;~er ·has revi'.ewed the below rt:ferenced requests for construction activ'·lties within the shore zone of Lake Tahoe. Ye have no objection to .the construction activities described in these applications contingent upon approval by your office.

l. Dale Hanson APN &5-260-33 \124248 2. Joseph Harrie APN 116-220-49 ll24235 3. Moana Beach P.O.A. APN 98-191-11 \124256 4. John Mozort APN 98-010-03 PRC652S.9 s. Re id Dennis APN 63-162-12 l/20953

6. Fred Damavandi APN 116-080-04 1124138

lf you have any questions, ple:ase give ne a call at your con­venience.

COUNTY OF PLACER DEPARTUENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

\JACK llARREN, DIRECTOR

---· . -~(1 bt. ~ \ J llES A. MC AS~STANT , ENGINEER

J~~~s \

CALENDAR PAG~ 67

. ' . . b'TAVE OF CA~tii:ORNtA-Sf JlTE l:ANDS cOaAMISSION .,_iiiiiai;.;..s;ioiiiii; __ aiiiiir:i....,iioioioii .............................. _qp __ ..,_, __ ..... ..._.,... _____ ...... ____ , GEORGE DEUKMl!JfAN. Go'ltlmo.t

ST ATE LAN OS COMMISSION 1afrr 13TH STREET :

·eACRAMENTO,.CAl.IFORNIA 95814 _ w 24256 89030601

PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

Project Title: MOAHA BEACH PIER EXTENSION AND RECONSTRUCTION

Project Proponent: Moana Beach Property OWners Association, Inc.

EIR ND 462

File Ref.: H 24256

SCHfl:

Project Location: In Lake Tahoe adjacent to Moana Beach Circle, McKinney Bay, El ! Dorado County. !

Project DrJscription: Extension 1 ~nd reconstruction of an existing pier. . . .

.. Contact Person: TED T. FUKUSHIMA Telephone: (916)322-7813

~-~

Tnis document is prepared pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 21000 et seq., Public Resources Code}, the State CEQA Guidelines {Sec~ tion 15000 et seq., Tjt1e 14, California C~~~ Regulations), and the State Lands Cotm1ission regulations (Section 2901 et seq., Title 2, California Code r!gulations).

Based upon the attached Initial Study, it has been found that:

~ the proj~ct will not have a significant effect on the environfl1ent.

mitigation measures fncluded in the.project will avoid potentially ~ignificant effects. ____:._,._:.. ___ -------.

68 t:AU!Cl!DA~ PAGE

. kUMUTE PAGE

.Fonn ~3.17 {~/~9)

~I ~ ;

• ('~ t=I-.. ~/.O

-. . ... ···:~ . ~

. :·.·.:·:·:·" . . . . . . ·~ .. ~ : ·.·

REVISED

LOCATION MAP ( ........ ::s:sua

. ~~t

. I

·~·"=-~····

MJ./W~I

M/..W"~.

~ .. G:'

.: =·::~:. ·. ··~c?~

W~O. '7125.318 December 7, 1988

RE: PIER RECONSTRUCTIOH/E:<TENSION - MOAHA BEACH POA PLACER COUNTY APN: 98-191-11

PROJRC't NARRATIVE

Reconstruction/extension at &n existing mul tiple-uee pier with 10.75 .. diameter stee.l piles at 15 1 o.c& 6 11 s~ecl "H11 beams, .e 11 x 10" wood joists at 241°' o.. C,, ~ 2" x 6;i min. cedar. deck, with catwalks. Extend to p~ovide necessar-Y water depth (lake bottom 6219.0) Existing sundeek to be removed in lieu of extension to make pier conforming to current building codes. (See submittal draw-ing. )

Ree~n~truction/extension of existing pier is to be by barge with pile driver; cassions or aleeve will be used when sediment is reouspend~d while pile driving. Anchorage ot barge will be to existin~ st~--ucture and/or anchors required for adequate sta~ili2ation of barge on the lake. All construction wastes will be collected onto barge and/or onsP,ore dumpst ... r and disposed at the nearest dumpster/sanitary lsndfill site. sm~ll boats (Joh~ boats) and tarps to be under construction arealS to provide collection of cons1:rl!ction debris preventing any discharge of wastes to the lake.

'.

-~70 CAi.~DAR PAGE

PAINUTE PAGE "·-n '"' ~···}

.. • ST r.1( LANC1S COMMISSION

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM~ Part I (To be completed by applicant) FORM 69.31111821

A. GENERAL iNFORMA'TiON

1. l~ame, address. and telephone number:

.-. 2 .. 27 8" O;ite F1l.cll: ___ ---. ____ ::1_

Filt• Ref.: 'W 2425fi

a. Applicant b. Contact person if other than apphcant:

ttoana Beach Property CMners Association, Inc.

P 0. Box 109

Homewood, CA 95718

_J \

2. a. Project location: (Please referen~·~o ne1rest town OI' community and include county)

In Lake Tahoe adjacent to Moana Beach Circle, McKinney Bay, El Dorado County.~

b. Assessor's parcel number: ~-.._.9..,8=--.-l.,.9 ... l...,-,..1 ... 1..._. _____ ..._ ________ ~---------

3. Existing zoning of project site:--:-----------------------------

4. E>eisting land u~e of project site:: --.&.:P.:.i.::e.:.r ___________________________ _

s. Proposed use of site:, __ --=s:.::a~rn:.;:e~•--=e~x:.::t..::e~f'l::.S.:.i .:::.On:.:.-::;an;.:..d=-..r:..;e:::.c~o~n~s::..t::;or:..;u::.:C::..t=-i~oi:.:.n:.i•:..;_.------

5. Othl!r permits require~: Tahae Regional Planning Agencv.?..,,¥1 Dotado._C_o_u_nt ... Y--... ______ _

B. PROJECT dESCRIPTION

1. For buildlng construc::t1cn 1~;._,;ects. completo "ATTACHMENT A".

2. For non·bt:ilping construction project5: Describe fully. the propOM!d activity, its PutPtll$e ~d intended l!se, e.g. for propoml mine1al prospecting permits, include the number of t1'St hom, siz.e ;,f holes, amount of materuil to bf excovatecf, maximum lurface area of disturbance, hole locatimu, depth of h~~s. etc. Attad"i plans or othe1 dr1· .

CAl.ENDAR PAGE

MINUTE PASE __ __,

";". ;-~··~: ~~~~~:~~;·;1/l::;: ·\

.~ ... ~'\ -~'\ ~" ;!ol_ ,t. ;- '

C. ENVIRONMENTAL S"TTIPJG

. "

•

Oescttbe the project site as,\ exim before thl! projact. including information on topographv, iol! st1bility, planu and animals, and any cultural, historie411, or scenic asJ)l!ctS. Describe any e1tisting structures en the site, and tht uie oq the structures.

2. Describe the surrounding properties. including informntion on plants and ;nimals and 1nv cultural, hlitorical, or scenic aspects. indicate the type of land use (residr.ntial, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one·family, *?artment houSC!s, shops. depart·

ment stores. etc.). and scale of development (height, frontage, set·back, rear yard, etc.). \

D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Answer the following questions by placing • check in the eppros>rietc box. Discuss all itoms checked "y11" or "maybe".

(Attach additional thcets as necessary)

VES MAYBE NO Will the project involve:

't. a chut~ in existing ftiatum of any bays, tidelands, beac:hH, l~kes, or hills, or subgtantial alteration • • • • • • • • C.1 0 @ of ground contourl7

2. ••change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roack7 •••••• , •••••• , •

3. a change in pattern, scale, or charicter of the general area of project? •••••••••••••••• , •••••••••••

4. a significant effect on plant or animal life? •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• . . . 5. significant amounts c;f solid waste 1)4' litter? ••••••••••••••• , •••••••••••••• , ••• , ••••••••••

6. a chan!J! in dust, ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in the vicinity? •••••• , ••••• , •••••••••••••••••••••

a change in ocean, bay, lake, strei1m. or ;round wator quality or quantity, ot oluration •••••••.•••• , • , ••

of existing drai~ pattcms7

8. a c:h3nge in axisting noise ot vibr~tion l~els in tho vicinitY? •••••••• , ••••••.•••••••••• , • , • , ••••• \

\

9. con5truction on filled land er on slope of 10 perC»nt or more7 •• , •• , • , •••••••••• , ••••• , ••••••••

10. use or disposal of pottntiallv haurdous mat1trlors,,wch a: toxic or rtldio=tlve •••••• , ••••• , •• , ••• , , •

substances, flantmables, or txplosities7

11. a change in ~rmnd for munici~I si:rvi()JS (police, fire, watir, saw119t, etc.)? ••••••• , .•••• , •••••• , • , •

12. an inc:resse in follis fuat consumption (electricity, oll, natural ;as, etc.)7 , ••••• , ••••• , •• , •••• , • , •• ,

13. Q larger pro}ect or a ceriH of projects? • ••••••••••••••••• ~~ .••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

E. CERTIFIC~TION

Cat,· 2/?7/89

0

n 0

0

D 0

0

0

0

0 0

D

CALENDAR PAGE •

0 ~

10 ~

tJ ~

0 (fil

0 [gJ

0 [;}

0 @

0 00

0 (fil

0 l]J

0 !]}

0 {]]

72 'l"";'r'·(~ ~,L,)

EfliVIRONMENTAl !MPACT ASSESSMENT i:'ltECKLIST..; PART II Form 13.20 (7/8~1 f~le'Ref.: , W 24256

J. BACKGROUND INFORMATION

A. Applicant: Hoana Beach Prcpert,11 Owners Association, Inc.

P.0 8 Box 109 ~~-:..a.x..a....:::.x.:.:-..o~-'--~~·----~~~~~~--~------·-------~·~~~~~~~~-

Homewood, CA 95718

B. Chtcklist Oat1:: __l. I 3 I 89

C. Contact Person: TED T. FUKUSHIMA Telephone: ( 916 l 322--7813

o. Purpose:. Repair and modify an existing pier.

E. Location: In Lake Taho~~ adjacent to Moana Beach Cir~le, McKinney Bay, E'1 Doi"ado

..trulnty. F. o~scription: Extension and '.reconstruction o{ an exis~ing pier.

'.

U. ENVIRONME~7AL IMPACTS. (f1'plain all "yes" and "maybe" a!1$Witn/

A. 1:ar1'1. Will \he proposai result in:

1. Unstable .urth conditions or changes in geologic sutHtrU'~turcs? •••••••••••.••••••••••••..•••.

7. Disru~tions, displ~cements, compaction, or o~roo~ring of the sc.il7 •••••••••••.•.•.••.••.••... . 3. Ch!ll'l'QC in topogr11ph•f or ground surf< ce relier ftatutH? •••••••••••• , ••••••••••.••••.•••..•

4. The destruction. covl!ring, or ~dificc tion of any unictue gaologic Of phyiic;t fouur~l' • • . • • • . • . . •.•

f) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils. eith~ Mor cH the site? ••••••• : ..•••••• : .••••••.

[] [i l

[l t~I r D ["I!

Cl .l Cl r.l

o. Ch"'!J!!S in d@p<11;~jo11 or t!fOSIOn of beach sands. ot ch&ngcS in.,ilraticm, capmumn c:~bh Whltirneyy-"j""' I "ll modify the chanO.,•,, <•f a river or stream or the bed of the ocun or M\' bay. in~J. or lrlr.e CALENDAR PACiE. l:J .4 J>

1, Expomre of all peorih! or property to geologic h11nrds such as eatltlqwikts, landslides 1111m!ifi!t~~11nrt ':' ~ ""! !~ fa1l71e._ or similar hazards? .•.•.••••..••.•.•••..••••.••••.•••••..• ~.- ." ~-:i-i·i-.i~i· i. 'i'i"ii~1 i'~

~-: ~~~- ~~~""-::~:~..,.-·~::~~~,.:~':>~t, ;'""~~<""'-'-'> .... y:...,~·.\....,_~'<'~~~-~--.:'.'.., ,••·:·--~·. ,0z,,-:- ~",.~.~'2'"'7.}~~-·~-0-._~.''.l<:,-~· >.:.•:'~~::<0·,11~"1'~-' -~t--,;/ ,·~1¢.'..t:_S..,.-...{~ ~;.,~...,.._,,,.!t_,~~""~-;\.l"'".......,.,..,..,..1-~· .. ~ Q.ll.of.."'""""'".;.;..;..K<;:,...ji;._,4·;., ~=-~c~ .......... .,,,,.~'< ... :>•-1".v ~,.<f"r~ .-~· --~"' l(' rv ·"• .

'i~';'.~0!.~<''~i~'-/';;::~:' ':.?,'~;~'(cl\·:;; «x·:. ':: t'~'.~~ ;·,~•;, :.:·:-~~,' ~\';t'.:::J,\\?J,,~''t' ', ,. ""·~ ~ •· .- ',, ' - · ~'· !'" ,, r'"""-' ·,,. .. .,,, "-< •, ""'J,"_ ·

" .~.' i11 .. \\i;11ttir,pio111~ahtS>ultul~ - .- ." _:: ·'.··- · ·::,~~:.:_:-.:"'.:·:·~~{:.~;,~~?f~~5~~~~f:t>tt,~1 •· S11h~1.inti.1i au cnir:w .. \101b 01 ch:tr11c11a1ton uf amt11e111 Jll quilhty> .••••.••••••••••• , , , ·•·• •••• '. ; .{.::J 'I . ! IX

:> Th<' creat101\ ul obwctionahlc oclon>. . · ... { ... _·:I l· l Ix . •• " •••••••••••••••••• f • • • • •••• ' • -- • ..,

3. Alt<'l.1t1r.11 of air movrmcnt. mo1sturl' or tr.mpr.ra1u1r.. 01 a11v change in climate, either locally o~ regionally?.

ll'1111•r Will th•: 1>1 opos:il result in:

1. Chall!lf'S 111 the currents, or the course 01 d1rect1on o: water moveml!nts, in either marir .·or fresh waters>

2. Chan!11•~ n> ab~o1ptton rates. drarnag.~ panerns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ••••• :· •• •

3. Altera11011s lo the course 01 flow of lluod wati:rs' .....

4. Chanyl! ir> the amount ol t111foce watN 1n any water body? .......••..••••••••••••••••••••••

&. Oisch;i1111! mto surface Natt:rs, or •n any alt<'ratinn of suri;.r.e water quality, including but not limited to 1rm111·1:1turc, d1ssolv1•d r xygcn c-..<turhidity?. . • . • . • . • . • • . • • • .•••••••••

G. Alter a1t<111 of the ducr.t un 01 ratr- of flow of grounll v,aters> ..

7. Chan1w m thr Quantity ot ground WJl•:rs. e1the1 through •j1rec1 ~dthtions or withdraw~ls, or through rnter· cept1011 of «so auu1fer by cuts 01 excavations? . . . . . . • • • . • • . • • • • • • •••.•••••••••

8. Suh~t<t11t1al reduc1101\ 1n th1! amount ol water otherwise avarlahh• Hll public water SUPJ>lie~? •••••••••••

9. Ex11oi;;11: of people 01 pro1,.>erty to water·related hazards such as flooding or ti~al waves? •••.•••••••••

10 S19niftc:int chan!lt'\ m the tv.m(leraturn. flow 01 r.hemical content of surface thermal sprtng\? •••• -· •.••.

O. 1'/u111 l.111· W•ll tht: p1011osa! 1<',ult 111:

l. Chanyc 111 the d1vc1s1ty of ,,,ec1es. or nur;nbc:r of any >Plcics of plmu (includin{;_l!Qes, ~hrubs, grass, crops, aod at1•Jat1r. plantsl'. • . • . .••.••••.••...••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••••

2. Re1l11ct1011 of the oumbt•h ol any uniql·e. rare or enda~ed spec:u:-s of pl~nts? ••• , ••••••••.•••••••

3. lntroductron of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to-the normal replenishment of ~xisting ,. ) . ' species .... ~ ............. ·. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . .............. .

4. Reduction rn acreage of any agricultural r:rop? ••.••••••.•••••••••••••.•••.•••••••••••••

E :111imul /.i/c- Will the proposal result in: \

1. Change in the d1vl!rs1ty of species, or numbers of any species of &nimals ,(birds, land anim31s including rephlC\, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, 01 insects)? ••.•..•••••.•••.•.•••••••••••••••••

2. Reduction of tile numt.:n of anv un1t111i:. rareot mdangert.'tl species of omimals? ••••••• , •••••••••••

3. l.ntro<111ct1on oi new SP.?Cres of animals into an ~rea, or rcsuit in a barrier 10 thli m!grC)t•~ , ··'lvement of animals' ....•••••••.•.•..••.••••.•.•.•••••••. , .• , ••.•••••• ,.

.t!. Oetr.rioralion to existini1 fist: or W.ldhfe habitat?.

F .\•mt'. Will th" propos;JI result m:

l. h1cl\•.is1: 1111:>.1stm9 nois•? levels? .••..•••••.•...••••••••••••.••.•••••.....••.•••••••

2. Exposure rif people to si:verr. noise lev1•1,1

G. l.1)://1 awl c;/ure'. Will the p1oposal result 111:

1. The 111octuct1on of new li9ht or gla•t!, •..• . ............................ .- ......... ·-· . H. I um/ l \•·. Will the proposal 1rsult in.

1. A suhstantml alteration of the 11rescn1 m 11lan111:ll land use ol an arez.? ••••••• , •••.•.•••..•.•

1. lnr.re~\I' 111 the l(ltP of use of any natural resourcfi1 ••••••.•.••••••.•.••.•.•••••••••••••••

? Sub~ta11ttal tJe11!et1on ol any nonrenewahlc re\ourcl'\? ••••••••.•••.••••• , •. :-: •••••.• ". •• , ••.

' ICAU!No•a PAGE

~PAGE-

LI I: ix

l..! ·x I

r·1 'X I .

{"I :x I

I .I !x I

'I. I I jx.

LI I ix

I I I :x I .

I. i I ,x. I .

1."J ;x 1·1 ;x.

: . ·x l i I .

I. I x·

l . , I ' ·x

I i I IX:

1 ·I ~x' I I

1 · j I I • iX !

I - I IM ix: .. LI I IX I I :

r:1 (] jx:

l. i I ;x '

1·1 ;x f -, x'

...

-n , ~~-,, .,-, ~·,,..,-~,,....,.,..·,·~'<'.:>'II'"' .. ,;:....1,<1.:""'-.::: .... 1.,.w';.,,.,~~~" -':'"'>-!~..-. .. -:i•""f..'!'r'r/~~...:, • .._' -

: ,~, ::~-. :•':;. }{:::?;;·~.~;s:··~ .,,<':''.· ' ~:

J. IU~I. 111 l'l"•·t. 01w' ti\i: 1111111v~dl rimllt in; Yes Maybe Ne

t. A ri~k o'.· an exnlosion· ~r the release of hazardou~ substances'(including, but not·tlmited to, oil, pesticides, O r-Ar.:-x_ ch1·m1cdls. or rad1.:il!c.;i)'in the event of an accident or upset conditions? . • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • . • • • • • . L~

2. Po~. •bin interference with emergency response plan or an emergency evacuatilln plan? • • • • • • • • • • • • . • . 0 !-:J L~

K. /'111111!111it1n. Will the proposal result in:

1 lhe alteration, distribution, dens it\•, or growth 1ate of the lium<1n population of tho 1rea? • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 [j ~ L. lltm.,i111:. Will the proposal result in:

1. Affectin!I existing housing, or create a demand for additional he>tning7 .•••••••••••••••••••••...

M. 1ru1opr1r101i1m/C'irculatinn. WHI the propotal result in:

1. Generation of substantiai·acfditional vehicular :novemant7 .••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••

2. Atlcrting existing parking facilities, or create a demand for new parking? ••••••••••••••••••••••••

3. Suhstantial impact upon existing transportation systems?. • . • • . • • • . • • •.• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••

4 Alterations-•o present pattern~ of circulati?n or movement of pc~ple andfor goods? •••••••••••••••• •

5. Alterations to waterborne, rai:, or air traffic? .•••.••.•••••••••.••••••••••••••••••• .' ••••

6. h1crea\P in traffic haz;rds to rr.otor vehicles, bicyclists. or pedestrians? •.•••• : ••••• ~ •••••••••••• . l'J. Pllhlit· Sm'irf'.\. Will the proposal hc:ve an effect upon, or result in a need for new or alte:td gGYCr-..mental

services in any of the following areas: ·

1. Fire protec11on? .••••.••••• ~ •.•.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••••• \

2. Pohce pfotection? ............................................................ .

3. S<;hools? .. . . . . ... . • . . . . . . .. . . . • . • . . . • . • . • . • . ~~·· •..•. T •••••••• ,,~ •••••••••••••••••

4. Pdrks and other recreational facilities?. • • • • • • • • • • • • • -• ••.•.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••

5: 1Maintenan:e of public facilities, including roads? •••••••. • .•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

6. Olher governmental services? •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•

!l. l.nt'rst1•. Will th'! proposal resuh in:

1. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

2. Substantial increase in demand upon eXisting sources of energy, or rec;uire the devf!lopm~n-cof newsourcesf" •

P. ·lltiiitif'.\. Will 1he prOP?Jil result in a nee.i for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities:

1. Power or natural gas? •.•••.••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••.

2. t:::ummuni~tion !'/stems? .................•...•....•.....•.•••......•.•..... · ...

3. Water? .......................•..•...• .,. •••...•.••... _ ..•.•.. •'• .......•••.....

4. Sewer or septic t;inks? •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• · ................. .

5. Storm water drainage? .•.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

S. Solid waste and disposal? .•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••..••••

a. llllmOtl /lrultfl. Will the proposal result in:

1. C1ea111~11 of any heiilth halilrd or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? •••••••••.•••..•

OD !x t.:._

D [J ~ 0 (] r~ 0 [J Ii OD ~ OD ~ 0 lJ ~

0 CJ ~ DD l~ 0 OD ~ D Cl ~ r1 ..J 0 l~

DO r-~

OD ~

[.J D ,-l~

DD fX 0 ·-; L.

.. jX

f:J [.l l)t

OD ~ OD ~

[J [I )t' . 2. Exposure of people fo potential health hazards? ••••••••••••••••••••• : •••••.•••••••••..•. LJ C.I [x

R. ~1rulirJirl. Will the proposal result in: e 1. Tht: obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public,'?' wm the propoial resu~t in 11\e cr~~tion of 'J r- 1 an a1-s_theticallv ofiensivc site open to public vi11w7 •••••••• .,._. •. , ••••••••••• : • • • • • • • • • • • . • . I _ l .•

S. J.l1'l'rruti1111. Will the proJwsal result in: CALENDAR PAGE J 5 1. An i11111c1r.t urir.n the quahty or quantity of existin;i retreatio~·o~nunitie\?; ••• M~J'm,"f1A"d£"·· . · . 03 k P -B ! f>

'1. ,Will me 1>(~1>0sal r~sull m 1h1fc.ltet'!t1Crn nf cir the de~truction of a preh_istoric o·r histor1~ nrcheological site?.

2. Will 1111! piopnsal result m advtrse physic.ii or ;,estnetic effects. to JI. prehistoric or historic building, uructur.:, 01 ohit!ct> ........................................................... .

3. 0CJl'\ the 111011osal have the potential to au~ a phy\ical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural valur~> • . . .•.•....••.••••...• : ..••.••.••.•••.•••••.•.•••••..•.••••••••.•.

4 Will the proposal restrict ex1stmg religious 01 ~td user within th• potential imp~t area? •••••••••••• ~ ,. \

U. ./tlunda111r.r Fi111/iun nf Signifi::anr~.

1. Doe~ the 1uoject have the potential to degrlde the quality of the e111,1ironment, reductt the habitat of a fish or wildhfe species, cause a f~h or wildlife population to drop below self-iustainirig lavels, threaten.to eliminate a plant or animal co:nmunity, reduce the number 01 restrict the ran~ uf a rare or end;mr,.erea plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the ma!or ~riods of ~ifornia h~W:>ry or prehistory? .••..•.. '

2. 00t:s the project have the llOtential to ;t,chieve short·term, to the cJ1sadvantage oi long·term, environmental goals? • • . • • . • . • . •••••.••.•..••.•••.•..••.•••.••••••••••••••••••.•••••••.•

3. Does the p1oject hav~ impdcts which ar~ individ~lf-: limited, but CUITlulativel\' considerable? ..••••••.•

4. Dea the pmiect h:;ire environmental effects which will cause su~Hlt'lntial Oldvi!1Se eUects on hum~n beings, either directly or indirectly? •••••..••••.•••••••••.•••••••.•.•. ._, •••...•••••••••••

Ill. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (See CommMts Amx:hedJ

'N. i'RELIMINARV DETERMINATION

011 the basis of this initl11I evaluation:

·,

,v.a~ Miivhf. No

[J [ 1 Ix:

0 [I Ix!

L.J I I Ix' . I

0 l. I (xi

[J I I Ix: I

[] l] I I

jX i

D [1 Ix;

[] I] Ix:

IX-J 1 find the proposi«1 i>roject COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, erid i NEGATIVE DECLARATION will I be prepared.

[] ~ finr.1 thiit although the propcied project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a s19mf1cant r.ffort m this ca~e because the, mitig.ltion measures d1?1cnbf!fl on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATiVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I •I

I . I I fo1d !he p1opos~d projer.t MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and in ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT RE:PORT IS I l"l!Utelf

D<1te: 3 I 3 I 89

• 4 -