Upload
clementine-carson
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
2013
THE HEALTHCARE ENVIRONMENT
UPDATE
Anne M. Guglielmo
Engineering Department
The Joint Commission
Department of Engineering 2013 - 2
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
RISK ICON
Integrated into the Manuals, E-dition, AMP, & FSA Tool All products will display a single icon at the EP level
for three risk-focused categories:1. National Patient Safety Goals2. Accreditation program-specific risk area standards3. Selected direct/indirect impact standards
In addition, the FSA Tool will use the R icon to identify the fourth risk category:
4. RFI standards from current cycle survey events.
Risk• Proximity to patient• Probability of harm• Severity of harm• Number of patients at risk
Department of Engineering 2013 - 3
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
RANKING RESULTS: 11 OUT OF 21 IN 2012
Top 20
RankStandard
2012 RFIs
2011 RFIs Subject
2 LS.02.01.20 51% 56% Means of Egress
3 LS.02.01.10 46% 52% General LSC Requirements
5 EC.02.03.05 40% 40% Features of Fire Safety
6 LS.02.01.30 39% 45% Life Safety Protection
7 EC.02.06.01 35% 31% Built Environment
9 LS.02.01.35 34% 29% Fire Suppression Systems
10 EC.02.05.01 33% 23% Utility Systems (Ventilation)
11 EC.02.02.01 30% 25% Hazardous Materials & Waste
15 EC.02.05.09 23% 22% Medical Gases
17 EC.02.05.07 22% 26% Emergency Power
21 EC.02.03.01 19% 21% Fire Safety
Department of Engineering 2013 - 4
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#2: LS.02.01.20 51%
The hospital maintains the integrity of the means of egress.EP 13 Corridor Clutter
Also scoredEPs 16 – 21 Suites issues
Boundaries & Size defined• Sleeping Suite <5000 sq ft• Non-sleeping suite <10,000 sq ft
EP 22: Patient sleeping room is not locked
Department of Engineering 2013 - 5
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
CORRIDOR STORAGE
“If the corridor looks cluttered…it probably is”
Carts Allowed:Crash Carts Isolation CartsChemo Carts
Anything in the egress corridor more than 30 minutes is storage
Dead end corridors may be used for storage Less than or equal to 50sqft space
Department of Engineering 2013 - 6
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
SUITES
Not identified on drawings BoundariesDimensionsExits
Department of Engineering 2013 - 7
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
LS DRAWING INFORMATION A legend that clearly identifies features of fire safety Areas of the building that are fully sprinklered (if the
building is partially sprinklered) Locations of all hazardous storage areas Locations of all rated barriers Locations of all smoke barriers Suite boundaries, including the size of the identified suites
—both sleeping (max 5,000 sq ft) and non-sleeping (max 10,000 sq ft)
Locations of designated smoke compartments Locations of chutes and shafts Any approved equivalencies or waivers
Department of Engineering 2013 - 8
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#3: LS.02.01.10 46%
Building and fire protection features are designed and maintained to minimize the effects of fire, smoke, and heat.EP 9 Fire Barrier PenetrationsEPs 5 – 7 Door issuesEPs 1 & 2 Building Type issuesEP 8 Duct issues
Department of Engineering 2013 - 9
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#5: EC.02.03.05 40%
The hospital maintains fire safety equipment and fire safety building features.Features of fire protection Risk Icons: EP4: Audio/Visual AlarmsEP11: Water flow alarm to fire pump flow testEP19: Automatic shutdown of AHU
Department of Engineering 2013 - 10
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
NEED FOR INVENTORY EC.02.03.05 EP 1 – 20:
Each device that is required to be tested must be documented in an inventory If x devices were tested last year, and x-1 were tested
this year, which device was missed?• Each device must be on the inventory to identify
which device was missed• Total number of devices (quantity) is not adequate
Lack of an inventory (written, electronic or other) results in a finding at the EP Findings solely for lack of inventory is not scored at
EC.02.03.05 EP 25
Department of Engineering 2013 - 11
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EC.02.03.05
During survey specific documentation is reviewed
If the documentation for a specific EP is not available a finding is written as non-compliant for that EPThe documentation should be readily available
If the organization clarifies after survey:Joint Commission Engineers will review and
evaluate complianceLD.04.01.05 EP 4 remains
Department of Engineering 2013 - 12
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EC.02.03.05EPs 1 -20: Missing documentation: score the EP as non-
compliant Also write a finding at EP 25 for documentation
not being readily available to the AHJ• If acceptable documentation appears, finding
at EP 1 – 20 might be removed during survey• EP 25 remains
LD.04.01.05 EP 4: Staff held accountable If 3 or more findings at EC.02.03.05 EP 1 – 20
Department of Engineering 2013 - 13
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EC.02.03.05 EP 25
For hospitals that use Joint Commission accreditation for deemed status purposes:Documentation of maintenance, testing, and
inspection activities for fire alarm and water-based fire protection systems includes the following:
Below for ContentsNote: For additional guidance on documenting activities:
NFPA 25, 1998 edition (Section 2-1.3) NFPA 72, 1999 edition (Section 7-5.2)
Department of Engineering 2013 - 14
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EC.02.03.05 EP 25
Name of the activity Date of the activity Required frequency of the activity Name and contact information, including
affiliation, of the person who performed the activity
NFPA standard(s) referenced for the activity
Results of the activity
Department of Engineering 2013 - 15
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#6: LS.02.01.30 39%
The hospital provides and maintains building features to protect individuals from the hazards of fire and smoke.EPs 16 – 23 Smoke Barriers & DoorsEP2 Hazardous Areas
Department of Engineering 2013 - 16
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#7: EC.02.06.01 35%
EP 1 Interior spaces meet the needs of the patient population and are safe and suitable to the care, treatment and services providedThe organization must provide a safe
environment Unsecured oxygen cylinders Outdoor safety is scored at
EC.02.01.01 EP 5
Department of Engineering 2013 - 17
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EC.02.06.01 EP 13 The organization maintains ventilation,
temperature and humidity levels suitable for the care, treatment and services provided
Ventilation: • i.e. doors held open by air pressure; odors
Temperature: • Hot / Cold calls
Humidity• Primary concern is for areas >60%RH
− Mold growth is possible EP 20: Patient care areas are clean and free of
offensive odors
Department of Engineering 2013 - 18
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#9: LS.02.01.35 34%
Risk Icon:EP 1: monitor authorized automatic sprinkler systemEP 2: water flow alarm
There are 18” or more of open space maintained below the sprinkler deflector to the top of storage.
NOTE: Perimeter wall and stack shelving may NFPA 13-1999, 5-6.6
Department of Engineering 2013 - 19
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
18” RULE
18”18”
OK OK OKWrong
Wall Wall
Ceiling
Perimeter Shelving Perimeter
Shelving
Department of Engineering 2013 - 20
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#11: EC.02.05.01 33%
EC.02.05.01 EP 1: Improper system designInability of the mechanical system to
achieve required results EC.02.05.01 EP 4: Lack of written inspection,
testing & maintaining frequenciesContinuous monitoring by a building
automation system (BAS) is acceptable
Department of Engineering 2013 - 21
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EC.02.05.01 EC.02.05.01 EP 6: Ventilation system is unable to provide
appropriate pressure relationships, air-exchange rates and filtration efficiencies Specific areas lack
negative or positive pressures in relationship to adjacent areas • i.e. Endoscopy Processing Room should be negative
to the egress corridor the correct number of air changes per hour Improper filtration
• MERV = minimum efficiency reporting value
Department of Engineering 2013 - 22
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#11: EC.02.02.01 30%
EP’s 3 – 5: Personal Protective Equipment and the process to manage hazardous materials and waste handling and exposures
EP 4 is a RISK ICON EP’s 6 – 7: Hazardous energy sources
Escorts to Hot Lab based on organization policy Perspectives, July 2012 EP 7 is a RISK ICON
Department of Engineering 2013 - 23
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#15: EC.02.05.09 23%
Medical Gas SystemsEP 1: Inspection Testing and MaintainingEP 2: Test when modified, installed or repaired EP 3: ObstructionsEP 3: Labeling
Contents of piping Areas served
• Accuracy
Department of Engineering 2013 - 24
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#17: EC.02.05.07 22%
EPs 4 – 7 Missed Generator & Automatic Transfer
Switch (ATS) Tests12 times per year between 20 & 40 days
Each emergency generator must be tested with a load of at least 30% of nameplate
Each ATS must be tested Missed triennial 4 hour test
Department of Engineering 2013 - 25
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
#21: EC.02.03.01 19%
Fire Safety (EP 1) Open junction boxesMore than 300cuft of nonflammable medical
gases (i.e. oxygen) per smoke compartment, open to the egress corridor
Fire Plan (EP 9 & 10)Lack of fire safety training as per fire plan
Surgical site fires
Department of Engineering 2013 - 26
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
LIFE SAFETY CODE SURVEYOR
LSCS BackgroundFacilities or Environment of Care basedPrefer CHFM certification
All HAP and CAH will be surveyed for a minimum of 2 days by a LSCSGreater than 1.5 million sq ft will be
surveyed for a third day by the LSCSAn additional day is added for every three
buildings that are classified as healthcare
Department of Engineering 2013 - 27
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
LIFE SAFETY CODE SURVEYOR Interfaces with survey team member(s) LSCS Survey Focus
Life Safety Chapter EC.02.03.05 EC.02.05.07 EC.02.05.09
May conduct the EC Session May conduct the EM Session
Other “Observations” May also survey
LD.04.01.05 EP 4 Accountability LD.04.04.01 EP 2 Hi-Priority LD.01.03.01 EP 5 Resources
Department of Engineering 2013 - 28
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
WHAT TRIGGERS ITL(IMMEDIATE THREAT TO LIFE)
Significantly compromised fire alarm system Significantly compromised sprinkler system Significantly compromised emergency power
supply system Significantly compromised medical gas master
panel Significantly compromised exits Other situations that place patients, staff or
visitors at extreme danger
Department of Engineering 2013 - 29
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
WHAT TRIGGERS ITL(IMMEDIATE THREAT TO LIFE)
PDA01An Immediate Threat to Health or Safety exists for patients or the public within the hospital.
CONT01The Immediate Treat to Health or Safety has been successfully abated and verified through the direct observation or other determining method.
Department of Engineering 2013 - 30
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
AFS 10 IS RELATED TO THE SOC AND PFIS
Failure to make sufficient progress on previously accepted PFIs (LS.01.01.01 EP 2)
Failure to develop ILSM policy and implement appropriate ILSMs (LS.01.02.01 EP 3)
Failure to manage previously accepted PFIs affects the Joint CommissionBoth organizations are aware of deficiencies that
have been managed using the PFI process
Department of Engineering 2013 - 31
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
DEFICIENCY RESOLUTION Resolution to a deficiency:
Resolve it immediately Correct it within 45 days:
Management process that documents the deficiency and actions to resolve
ILSM must be considered Plan For Improvement located in the Statement
of Conditions™ Corrected within 6 months of the Projected
Completion Date ILSM must be considered
Department of Engineering 2013 - 32
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
45 DAY CORRECTIVE ACTION Documented
Origination date Completion date Kept available for rolling 3 years
Life Safety deficiencies Must not exceed 45 days If greater than 45 days create a Plan For Improvement
(PFI)If originally a work order, close out as complete and
generate the PFI Must be made available to the Joint Commission
During survey to confirm management of the deficiency Upon request by the Joint Commission
Department of Engineering 2013 - 33
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
HOW MANY OPEN PFIS ARE TOO MANY?
The PFI process was created to allow organizations to self assess and create a Plan for Improvement
The self disclosure has never defined how many is too many
The ILSM process was created to allow both the organization and The Joint Commission to be aware of Life Safety Code deficiencies
Failure to make progress on previously accepted PFIs, including failure to implement ILSMs results in Conditional Accreditation
Department of Engineering 2013 - 34
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
HOW MANY OPEN PFIS ARE TOO MANY?
Survey Process: There is no limit to the number of PFIs Evaluate both closed and currently open PFIs in the
View All screen Spot check during building tour both some closed and
open PFIs to evaluate how well the organization is managing the PFI process
Evaluate the scope of PFI entries Are there life safety deficiencies Are they greater than maintenance items (i.e.
screws missing from a door hinge)
Department of Engineering 2013 - 35
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
STATEMENT OF CONDITIONS: PFI PFIs should be related to the LS Chapter PFIs should provide specific information
No blanket statements “…penetrations on 3rd floor”
Specific references to Life Safety Drawings is acceptable 32 penetrations as identified on LS Drawing
3rd Floor, Center Tower dated 3/3/2010 Projected Completion Date is for all listed
items (i.e. “32 penetrations”)
Department of Engineering 2013 - 36
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
TWO FORMS OF EQUIVALENCIES Fire Safety Evaluation System (FSES)
A process of calculating the features of life safety and deducting any deficiencies, with the outcome determining if the building is equivalized based on the FSES
Traditional Equivalency A process of field verification identifying alternative
methods of fire safety that off-set the identified deficiency Field verification from one of the following:
Registered Architect Fire Protection Engineer Local AHJ responsible for fire safety
Department of Engineering 2013 - 37
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
HISTORY AUDIT TRAIL
The History Audit Trail is used by SIG Engineers when considering extensions or other activities related to an organization
Prior to surveying, the surveyor must preview the History Audit Trail to discover if equivalencies or other actions have occurred by SIG Engineers
When surveying, brief but accurate information entered in the File Room is important
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
2012 LIFE SAFETY CODE
Department of Engineering
The Joint Commission
Department of Engineering 2013 - 39
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
NFPA 101-2012
1.Means of Egress Enhanced Patient lift & transport equipment may be
stored in the Means of Egress, provided 5ft clear corridor width is maintained Fire plan addresses management of
storage Accommodates current “equipment in
use”
Department of Engineering 2013 - 40
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
NFPA 101-2012
2. Fixed seating permitted provided 6ft clear width < 50sqft with 10’ between groupings
Groupings must be on same side of the egress corridor
Department of Engineering 2013 - 41
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
NFPA 101-2012 CORRIDOR COOKING
3. Cooking Facilities One cooking area may be open to the egress corridor
per smoke compartment Any additional cooking areas must be in protected
room similar to hazardous areas Provisions:
No deep fat fryers Safety equipment to de-activate fuel supply Grease baffles installed No solid fuel (i.e. charcoal)
Department of Engineering 2013 - 42
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
NFPA 101-2012 FIREPLACES
4. Fireplaces in smoke compartments with patient sleeping rooms
Section 18/19.5.2(2), (3) and (4) Allow the installation of direct vent gas
fireplaces In smoke compartments containing patient
sleeping rooms Installation of solid fuel burning fireplaces in
areas other than patient sleeping areas
Department of Engineering 2013 - 43
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
NFPA 101-2012 DECORATIONS
5. Allow the use of Furnishings, Mattresses, and Decorations including Section 18/19.7.5
Allows the installation of combustible decorations on Walls Doors Ceilings
LSC Section 18/19.7.5.6
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
BUILDING MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (BMP)
The BMP is no longer available to offset findings during survey, but is considered “best practice”
All EPs related to the original ten BMP items are ‘C’ categories
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
RISK ASSESSMENT
Department of Engineering 2013 - 46
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EC.02.01.01 EP 1 (A CATEGORY)
The hospital identifies safety and security risks associated with the environment of care that could affect patients, staff and other people coming into the hospital’s facilities. NOTE: Risks are identified from internal sources such as
ongoing monitoring of the environment, results of root cause analysis, results of annual proactive risk assessments of high-risk processes, and from credible external sources such as Sentinel Event Alerts. (See also EC.04.01.01 EP 14).
Is there a risk assessment process? Quality of the risk assessment process
Department of Engineering 2013 - 47
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EC.02.01.01 EP 3 (C CATEGORY)
The hospital takes action to minimize or eliminate identified safety and security risks in the physical environment.
Did the organization respond to the risk assessment and correct the identified risk?
Department of Engineering 2013 - 48
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
Identify Safety & Security Risks
Established Process?
NoYes
EC.02.01.01 Risk
Assessment
Identify Risk?
EP 3
NoYes
Resolved?
Yes No
EP 1
EP 1
Unsafe conditions? Consider
EC.02.06.01 EP 1
Department of Engineering 2013 - 49
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
EC.02.06.01 EP 1
Interior spaces meet the needs of the patient population and are safe and suitable to the care, treatment and services provided.Unsafe patient care areas
Behavioral Healthcare Unit: Clinical or Physical?• Ensure the risk is not being managed clinically• Does not include non-patient care areas
Department of Engineering 2013 - 50
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
WHEN TO CONDUCT A RISK ASSESSMENT
Use to evaluate any issue that lacks a clear decision
Educated guess that drives your assumptions Clearly document the process Determine when to re-assess the issue Problem solving approach to determine
appropriate response Preventive strategies to address potential issues
Department of Engineering 2013 - 51
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
CONDUCTING A RISK ASSESSMENT: SEVEN STEPS
1. Identify the issue2. Develop arguments in support of the issue3. Develop arguments against the issue4. Objectively evaluate both arguments5. Reach a conclusion6. Document the process7. Monitor and reassess the conclusion to
ensure it is right conclusion
Department of Engineering 2013 - 52
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
ENVIRONMENTAL TOURS
The organization monitors conditions in the environment of care. EP 12 Environmental tours
patient care areas every six months EP 13 Environmental tours
non-patient care areas annually EP 14 Ongoing monitoring of actual / potential risk EP 15 Evaluation of objectives, scope, performance
and effectiveness of all EOC management plans
Department of Engineering 2013 - 53
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
PRA EC.02.06.05 EPS 2 & 3
Preconstruction Risk Assessment (PRA)Construction or renovation in occupied
healthcare facilities can result in environmental problems such as:NoiseVibration Creation or spread of contaminantsDisruption of essential servicesEmergency ProceduresAir quality
Department of Engineering 2013 - 54
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
INTERIM LIFE SAFETY MEASURES Order of Standards (LS.01.02.01)
EP 1 & 2 regardless of ILSM policyEP 3 must clearly define the ILSM policy
including AFS 10 Process When to implement What to do to protect occupants Both construction related and non-
compliance with the LSCEPs 4 – 14 align with policy and
implementation strategies
Department of Engineering 2013 - 55
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING630 792 5900
George Mills, MBA, FASHE, CEM, CHFM, CHSP
Director
Anne Guglielmo, CFPS, LEED, A.P., CHSP
Engineer
John Maurer, CHFM, CHSP
Engineer
OPEN Engineer Position
OPEN Engineer Position
Department of Engineering 2013 - 56
© C
opyr
ight
, The
Joi
nt C
omm
issi
on
These slides are current as of 5/1/2013. The Joint Commission reserves the right to change the content of the information, as appropriate.
These slides are only meant to be cue points, which were expounded upon verbally by the original presenter and are not meant to be comprehensive statements of standards interpretation or represent all the content of the presentation. Thus, care should be exercised in interpreting Joint Commission requirements based solely on the content of these slides.
These slides are copyrighted and may not be further used, shared or distributed without permission of the original presenter or The Joint Commission.
THE JOINT COMMISSION DISCLAIMER