135
Class Septemb er 30

Class 7 Septemb er 30. ③ Ethics Ethics is the principles, standards and norms of conduct that govern individual and firm behavior. What is ethical

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Slide 1

Ethics Ethics is the principles, standards and norms of conduct that govern individual and firm behavior. What is ethical in one country maybe unethical elsewhere. Also, in some cases, there is a grey area which is legal but unethical. There are two schools of thought. 1) Ethical relativism is an idea that all ethical are relative. 2) Ethical imperialism is an idea that there is one set of Ethics and we have it. In practice, both of these schools of thought are unrealistic. Ethics helps to combat corruption which is the abuse of public power for private benefits usually in form of bribery in cash or in kind. Many companies have introduced a code of conduct - a set of guidelines for making ethical decisions.

Japanese gift giving customs Gift giving in Japan is deeply rooted in tradition with gifts given not only for social occasions, but also for social obligations -- gifts given when indebted to others, both family and business. Many aged Japanese believe gift giving is very ethical. However, if we would gave a very expensive gift to someone for some special private help, it would be a not ethical conduct. This is the reason why many companies have a code of conduct. The President of US is required to publicly disclose personal financial information, including personal gifts over minimal amounts ($350 as of this writing) which have been received by him and his immediate family. For government officials in USA, no gift but there are exceptions to the prohibition may allow, for example, the receipt of gifts of minimal value (under $20 in value), incidental food or drinks at events,

Norms & Ethical challenges Norms are prevailing practices of relevant players that affect the focal individuals and firms. How firms strategically respond to ethical challenges is often driven by norms. When confronting ethical challenges, individual firms have four strategic choices.

VW under investigation over illegal software that masks emissions The US government has ordered Volkswagen to recall almost 500,000 cars after discovering that the company deployed sophisticated software to cheat emission tests allowing its cars to produce up to 40 times more pollution than allowed. The Environment Protection Agency (EPA) on Friday accused VW of installing illegal defeat device software that dramatically reduces nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions but only when the cars are undergoing strict emission tests. Four Strategic choices 1. Reactive strategyDeny responsibility. Do less than required. 2. Defensive strategy Accept responsibility. Do the least that is required. 3. Accommodative strategy Accept responsibility. Do all that is required. 4. Proactive strategy Accept responsibility. Do more than required.

Sweatshop A sweatshop is a manufacturing facility characterized by poor working conditions, violations of labor law, long hours, and low wages. It is a negatively connoted term for any working environment considered to be unacceptably difficult or dangerous. The term originated in 1892, when concerned individuals began to speak up about the unsafe working conditions for American garment workers. Today, sweatshops can be found all over the world, although they are an especially big problem in developing nations In some countries, consumers have lobbied major companies to reduce their reliance on this type of labor in an attempt to promote healthy working conditions for laborers in the third world. There are pros and cons on this issue. In US, Sweatshop is defined as an employer that violates more than one federal or state labor law governing minimum wage and overtime, child labor, industrial homework, occupational safety and health, workers compensation or industry regulation in US. It is argued that sweatshop-type jobs in a developing country are often a significant improvement over other employment options . UK, United States and Japan went through its own period of sweatshop labor during its development. China has more than 150million mingong (), which is one of the biggest labor troubles in China for many years. However, it improved its situation a lot recently because of China s high economic growth.

Nike Sweatshop (From Wikipedia) Nike, Inc. has been accused of having a history of using sweatshops, a working environment considered by many people to be dangerous and difficult. Workers can be exposed to hazardous materials, harmful situations, extreme temperatures, and abuse from employers. Sweatshop workers often work long days, sometimes exceeding 14 hours, and earn pay far below a "living wage". Now, many firms in developed countries compare the wages and the amount of labor of the workers in Nike factories to developed world standards.

Nike Anti-Sweatshop Campaign The Nike Anti-Sweatshop campaign is one branch of a larger global movement aimed at raising awareness about labor conditions in manufacturing zones of developing nations where major global corporations increasingly contract for the manufacture of their products. Nike is one of the largest, most popular, and most profitable shoe and clothing companies in the world. But the reality for many workers overseas making Nike shoes and clothing is far less rosy. Workers are paid wages insufficient to meet their basic needs, are not allowed to organize independent unions, and often face health and safety hazards.

IMC Japan In Feb.2009, IMC sold 12,000 Allerhand Ergo one shoulder backpack through Shop Channel TV shopping. (60 minutes & 30 minutes program) 1,200 pieces X JPY10,000= JPY12,000,000 = TBH3,600,000 The fist sales was in August 2008 and we sold 1,000 pieces. This was the second sales at this TV shopping company. I had confidence on quality of this products because I visited their factory in China and did in line check by myself. However, I found a defect of this product before we get a claim from customers. I decided RECALL of this product and told my idea to Shop Channel. They did not want to do RECALL and we had a big discussion.28 Finally, they agree to do RECALL with unwillingness. IMC lost JPY6,000,000 =TBH1, 800,000 + THB 500,000 sending and returning cost. However, e got a good reputation from customers like IMC is a very honest company because they told customers the defect of the product before customers know. IMC lost around JPY15,000,000 = THB 4,500,000 because of RECALL action. However, IMC got a good reputation from customers and TV shopping company. Then, TV shopping company invited IMC again to join their program after that accident. (Ordinary, they stop the business.)

PART II : Acquiring Tools We need academic tools for import & export management. Preface Why do nations trade International trade consists of Exporting & Importing. There are two main sectors in Exporting & Importing; Goods & Services. Why do nations trade? Because, both countries get economic gains from international trade. International trade is a win-win game not zero sum game.International TradeInternational TradeEXPORT Goods & Services IMPORTGoods & Services

International Trade vs GDPInternational TradeGDP

World Export & Import Volume In merchandise export, China, USA , Germany and Japan are leading countries and have around 11%, 8 %,7% and 4% world market share respectively in 2014. In merchandise import, USA is the largest countries and has around 12% world share in 2014. 35 World trade growth (6%) outpaces GDP growth (3%) averaging 3% during 1998~2008. International Trade would be a key to increase GDP of each country. World export & import value of China is growing very rapidly . Also, India & Thai are growing more than average of World export & import value.

However, we must very carefully check the details of goods. ( ex. Finished products or Components) The value chain would be the key for this analyze in this global age. 2014 World Export Ranking 1 China $2,252,000,000,000-- EU $2,173,000,000,0002 United States $1,610,000,000,0003 Germany $1,492,000,000,0004 Japan $710,500,000,0005 South Korea $628,000,000,0006 France $578,300,000,0007 Netherlands $552,800,000,000-- Hong Kong $528,200,000,0008 Russia $520,300,000,0009 UK $503,400,000,00010 Italy $500,300,000,00022 Thailand $232,000,000,000

1990~2010 World Export unit : million US$ 1990 1995 2000 2005 2est.WORLD 3,332,750 4,955,400 6,391,210 10,374,000 14,920,000 447% ======================================================= 1. China 62,091 148,780 249,203 761,9531,506,000 2420% 2. Germany 410,104 523,802 550,112 977,881 1,337,000 326% 3. U.S.A. 393,592 584,743 781,918 907,158 1,270,000 322% 4. Japan 287,581 443,116 479,249 594,905 765,200266% 5. France 216,591 286,738 300,024 437,611 508,700 234% 6. Korea 65,016 125,058 172,268 284,419 466,300 717% 7. Italy 170,486 233,998 239,886 372,928458,400 268% 8. Holland 131,775 196,276 213,382 349,812 451,300 342% 9. Canada 127,629 192,197 276,635 359,399406,800 318% 10. U.K. 185,268 242,006 281,564 371,370 405,600 218%11. HKG 82,160 173,750 201,860 289,337 388,600 473%24 Thailand 23,068 56,439 68,963 110,178 191,300 829% 2014 World Import Ranking 1 United States $ 2,380,000,000,0002 China $2,249,000,000,0003 Germany $1,319,000,000,0004 Japan $811,900,000,0006 United Kingdom $686,000,000,0005 France $634,000,000,000- Hong Kong $499,400,000,0007 South Korea $542,900,000,0008 India $508,100,000,0009 Netherlands $488,800,000,00011 Canada $482,100,000,00025 Thailand $219,000,000,000

1990~2010Value of World Import unit : million US$ 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010World 3,432,370 5,056,480 6,584,770 10,619,400 12,647,000 368%=========================================================1 U.S.A. 516,987 770,852 1,259,300 1,732,350 1,903,000 368%2 Germany 346,153 464,271 495,351 780,444 1,307,000 377%3 China 53,345 132,084 225,094 659,953 1,120,000 2010%4 Japan 235,368 335,882 379,511 514,922 636,800 270%5 France 234,447 281,440 310,926 473,803 577,700 246%6 U.K. 224,412 265,297 334,396 483,017 546,500 243%7 Italy 181,968 206,040 238,023 384,802. 459,700 252%8 HK 82,490 192,751 212,805 299,533 431,400 520%9 Korea 69,844 135,119 160,481 261,238 417,900 598%10 Holland 126,475 176,874 198,886 310,571 408,400 379%11 Canada 123,244 168,041 244,786 331,565 406,400 329%12 India 359,30022 Thailand 33,045 70,786 61,923 118,158 156,900 474%

41

Balance of Trade A country trade with the rest of the worldExport Import= (Merchandise & Services)Trade surplusTrade deficitI) Theories of International Trade There are six major theories of international trade. Three classical trade theories and three modern theories.

International Trade Theory 1. Classical Theories Adam Smith (Absolute Advantage) is one of the most famous economists in history and he wrote The Wealth of Nations to criticize Mercantilism in 1776. Then, David Ricardo (Comparative Advantage) improve Adam Smith idea in 1817. 2. Modern Theories In 1966, Raymond Vernon (Product life Cycle) pointed out that trade is not static in real world. In 1980s, Brander & Spencer (Strategic Trade) insisted that strategic intervention by governments would affect international trade results. The most resent theory is Michael Porter (National Competitive Advantage of Industries).

InternationalTrade Theories Classical Trade Theories1.Mercantilism2. Absolute Advantage 3.ComparativeAdvantage Modern Trade Theories4.Product Life Cycle5.Strategic Trade6. National Competitive Advantage of Industries.

... Audible

1) The Mercantilism ( 1600~1800) If a country would promote favorable trade balance (a surplus of exports over imports), it would realize net payments received from the rest of the world in the form of gold and/or silver. Such revenues would contribute to increased spending and a rise in domestic output and employment. To promote a favorable trade balance, the mercantilists advocated government regulation of trade. Tariffs, quotas, and other commercial policies were proposed by the mercantilists to minimize imports in order to protect a nations trade position. However, this economic policy could provide at best only short term economic advantage. Mercantilism; International trade is a zero-sum game. The wealth of the world is fixed. A nation should export more and import less. A country gets trade surplus in the form of gold & silver.

2) Absolute AdvantageThis is the international trade theory by Adam Smith that Specialization and Free trade will be beneficial for the world. The world gains benefit from specialization and international trade. In this case, each nation must have a good that it is absolutely more efficient in producing than the other nation.

When one nation has an absolute cost advantage (using less labor to produce a unit of output) in one goods and the other nation has an absolute cost advantage in the other goods, a nation should concentrate on producing this goods. Then a nation export the goods in which it has an absolute cost advantage and import the other goods in which it has an absolute cost disadvantage.

Absolute Advantage before Specialization In a 2-nation, 2-product world. To make 1 unit Car Rice Japan 10 hours 20hours Thailand 40 hours 10hours

Production and Consumption without Trade Use 100 hours each product Car Rice Japan 10.0 units 5.0 units Thailand 2.5 units 10.0 units-----------------------------------------------------------------Total production 12.5 units 15.0 units

Production with specialization Car Rice Japan 20.0 0.0 Thailand 0.0 20.0------------------------------------------------------------------- Total production 20.0 20.0 Japan Trades 6 units of Car for 6 units of Thai Rice Car Rice Japan 14.0 (10.0) 6.0 (5.0) Thailand 6.0 (2.5) 14.0 (10.0) Gain from International Trade Car Rice Japan 4.0 1.0 Thailand 3.5 4.0

Thailand could consume 3.5 units more car than it could have consumed before specialization and trade and 4 units more rice. And Japan could consume 4.0 units more car than it could have consumed before specialization and 1 unit more rice. As a result of specialization and trade, output of both car and rice would be increased, and consumers in both nations would be able to consume more.

b) Absolute advantage

Adam Smith (1723~1729), the Farther of modern Economics, is the author of The Wealth of Nations which is the first modern work of Economics. Smith was a leading advocate of free trade. Smiths trading principle was the principle of absolute advantage. With free trade, nations could concentrate their production on goods they could make most cheaply, with all the consequent benefits of the division of labor.

3) Comparative Advantage Comparative Advantage is still one of the most important international trade theories. This theory is one step further than the absolute advantage by exploring what might happen when one nation has an absolute advantage in the production of all goods. David Ricardo (1772~1823) made Adam Smiths theory improved by exploring what might happen when one country has an absolute advantage in the production of all goods. Ricardo developed a principle to show that mutually beneficial trade can occur even when one nation is absolutely more efficient in the production of all goods.

Ricardo emphasized the supply side of the market. The immediate bases for trade stemmed from cost differences between nations, which were underlaid by their natural and acquired advantages. Also, Ricardo emphasized the importance of absolute cost differences among nations. Specialization According to Ricardos theory of comparative advantage, it makes sense for a country to specialize in the production of those goods that it produces most efficiently and to buy the goods that it produces less efficiently from other countries, even if this means buying goods from other countries that it could produce more efficiently itself. Specialization Videohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=e0H7r_Dl1CQ

Comparative Advantage Before Specialization In a 2-nation, 2-product world To make 1 ton Mango Rice Thailand 10.0 hours 13.33 hours Japan 40.0 hours 20.0 hoursProduction and Consumption without Trade Use 100 hour /product Mango Rice Thailand 10.0 tons 7.5 tons Japan 2.5 tons 5.0 tons-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total production 12.5 tons 12.5 tons After swapping 4 tons of rice with Thailand which gets 4 tons of rice from Japan , Japan still ends up with 6 tons of rice, which is more than it had before specialization. In addition, the 4 tons of Mango it receives in exchange is 1.5 tons more than it produced before trade.

Specialization

Mango RiceThailand15.0 (10.0) 3.75(7.5)Use 150 for Mango /50 for RiceJapan 0.0 (2.5) 10.0 (5.0)Use 200 for rice ----------------------------------------------------------------Total production 15.0(12.25) 13.75(12.5)

Thailand 4 tons of Mango to Japan 4 tons of Rice from Japan Mango RiceThailand 11.0 7.75Japan 4.0 6.00

Gains from Trade Mango Rice Thailand 11.0 7.75 10.0 7.50------------------------------------------------------- 1.0 0.25 Japan 4.0 6.0 2.5 5.0-------------------------------------------------------- 1.5 1.0

If Thailand exchanges 4 tons of Mango with Japan for 4 tons of rice, it still left with 11 tons of rice, which is 1 ton more than it had before trade. In exchange for its 4 tons of Mango, when added to the3.75 tons it now produces domestically, leaves it with a total of 7.75 tons of rice, which is 2.5 ton more than it had before specialization. The basic message of the theory of comparative advantage is that potential world production is greater with unrestricted free trade than it is with restricted trade. Ricardos theory suggests that consumers in all nations can consume more if there are no restrictions on trade. This occurs even in countries that lack an absolute advantage in the production of any good.. In other words, to an even greater degree than the theory of absolute advantage, the theory of comparative advantage suggests that trade is a positive-sum game in which all countries that participate realize economic gains. Thailand WHY 150/50 ? Production with specialization Mango RiceThailand Use 200 for Mango 20.0 0.00 Japan Use 200 for rice 0.0 10.0 Summery Theory of Comparative Advantage Theory of comparative advantage was explained by David Ricardo in 1817 and it improved Adam Smiths the theory of absolute advantage. This is the theory that focuses on the relative (not absolute) advantage in one economic activity that one nation enjoys in comparison with other nations. Even without an absolute advantage, still a nation gains from international trade. Opportunity Cost Opportunity cost is the cost of purchasing one activity at the expensive of another activity, give the alternatives. For example : Thailand produces more rice and less apples. Japan produces more apples and less rice from the decision of selecting less opportunity cost. Factor Endowments Theory In 1933, Heckscher & Ohlin explained that absolute & comparative advantage stem from different factor endowments . A factor endowment is commonly understood as the amount of land, labor, capital, technology and entrepreneurship that a country possesses and can exploit for manufacturing. This theory proposed that nations will develop comparative advantage based on their locally abundant factors. 4) Product Life Cycle The three classical theories have an assumption of static economic situation. However, in the real world, factor endowments and trade patterns change over time. Thailand was an importer of cars for many years but now it became an exporter. This is the first dynamic international trade theory which accounts for changes in the patterns of trade over time by focusing on product life cycles. In 1966, Raymond Vernon explained his dynamic (not static) theory of international trade in his book. He divided the world into three categories. A. The lead innovation country (USA) B. Other Advanced countries C. Developing countries

Every product has three life cycle stages: 1. New product 2. Maturing product 3. Standardized product

5) Strategic Trade Absolute Advantage & Comparative Advantage do not say anything about the role of governments. Smith & Ricardo insisted no government intervention would be better for (international) trade - Free Market. Strategic Trade theory suggests that strategic intervention by governments in certain industries can enhance its possibilities for international success. Highly capital-intensive industries like as the commercial aircraft industry with high barriers to entry where domestic firms may have little chance of entering and succeeding without government assistance. trade theorists propose only a few strategically important industries, not all industries like Mercantilists did. Airbus by EU countries (France, Germany, UK & Spain) would be the best example. Boeing vs. Airbus

Japanese government decided to subsidize Elpida Memory Inc. which is a manufacture of DRAM for PC to cope with Korean manufactures . Dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) is a type of random-access memory that stores each bit of data in a separate capacitor within an integrated circuit. This kind of subsidize would increase year by year.

Boeing vs. Airbus No subsidize from government Boeing vs. Airbus Subsidize to airbus $10billion from government 6) National Comparative Advantage Theory of National Comparative Advantage focus on why certain industries within a nation are competitive internationally. The competitive advantage of certain industries in different nations depends on 4 aspects. 1. Factor endowments 2. Domestic demand conditions 3. Domestic firm strategy 4. Related & supporting industries

The dynamic interaction of these four aspects explains what is behind the competitive advantage of leading industries in different nations. This theory is the first multilevel theory to realistically connect firms, industries and nations. Some critics argue that this theory places too much emphasis on domestic conditions. In this global age, some cases, overseas demand is more important than domestic demand.

7) Evaluating Theories of International Trade 1. The classical pro free trade theories seem like common sense today. Although, these theories have assumptions of two-nation & two-product world, perfect resource mobility, no foreign exchange complications and zero transportation costs, free trade still beneficial as Smith & Ricardo suggested in the real world. 2. Modern theories rely on more realistic product life cycles, first-mover advantages and the diamond theory to explain and predict patterns of trade. 3. The victory of pro-free trade theories is not complete. The political realities governing international trade indicate that Mercantilism is still alive.Mid Term ExaminationII) Realities of International Trade International Trade has substantial mismatches between theories and realties. The political realties are that plenty of trade barriers exist. There are two types of trade barriers; 1) Tariff Barriers 2) Nontariff Barriers 1) Tariff Barriers A trade barrier is a means of discouraging imports by placing a tariff on imported goods. An import tariff is a tax imposed on a good brought in from another country. When import tariffs are imposed, net losses called deadweight costs occur. Although everybody in a country suffers because of high price, the government must listen to the powerful lobby. (political realties) 2) Nontariff Barriers (NTBs) Tariff barriers are criticized around the world and nontariff barriers are choice in trade wars, now. NTB discourages imports using means other than taxes on imported goods.

NTB Subsidies Import Quota Export Restraints Local Contents requirements Administrative Policies Antidumping duties Subsidies Subsidies are government payments to domestic firms like the EU s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and Japans rice subsidy. Import Quota Import Quotas are restrictions on the quantity of goods that can be brought into country. Import Quotas are worse than tariffs because foreign goods can still be imported if tariffs are paid. Quotas are the most straightforward denial of comparative advantage. Voluntary Export Restraints Exporting countries voluntarily agree to restrict their exports. One of the most famous examples is the VERs that the Japanese government agreed to in the early 1980s to restrict US-bound automobile exports. Actually, Japanese government agreed VER reluctantly by pressure from US government.

Local Contents requirementsA requirement stipulating that a certain proportion of the value of the goods made in one country must originate from that country. Because of VERs, Japanese automakers switched to producing cars in US & other countries. To avoid screwdriver plants, many governments imposed local contents requirements on Japanese automakers. (To use more than 51% of local components and labor.) Administrative Policies Administrative policies are bureaucratic rules that make it harder to import foreign goods. In 2011, several countries suddenly banned foods from Japan because of radiation trouble in Japan.

Antidumping Duties If some foreign company export the product below costs to unfairly drive domestic firms out of business, a country impose antidumping duty on this import product.Economic Arguments against Free Trade Trade barriers undermine international trade . Although certain domestic industries & firms benefit from them, the entire country tends to suffer. Still we have two arguments against free trade. Political arguments & economic arguments. There are two prominent economic arguments against free trade, also. 1) The need to protect domestic industries. The oldest & most frequently used economic argument against free trade is the urge to protect domestic industries, firms & jobs from allegedly unfair foreign competition. (Protectionism)

2) The need to shield infant industries. Young domestic firms need government protection. Otherwise, they stand no chance of surviving and will be crushed by mature foreign rivals. Although this arguments is sometimes legitimate, Airbus was a good example, governments & firms have a tendency to abuse it. Airbus continues to ask for subsidies even now.

Political arguments against Free Trade Political arguments against free trade are based on advancing nations political & environmental agenda regardless of possible economic gains from trade. There are main 4 arguments. 1) National security 2) Consumer protection 3) Foreign policy 4) Environmental & social responsibility

1) National security National security concerns are often invoked to protect defense-related industries. France can purchase nuclear weapons, aircraft carriers, & combat jets at much lower costs from US. US eager to sell them, but the French answer was No thank you! 2) Consumer protection Consumer protection has frequently been used as an argument for nations to erect trade barriers. American hormone-treated beef was banned by the EU because of the alleged health risks. Even though US won a WTO battle on this, EU still has refused to remove the ban. 3)Foreign policy Trade intervention is often used to meet foreign policy objectives. Trade embargoes are politically motivated trade sanctions against foreign countries to signal displeasure. Many Arab countries maintain embargoes against Israel. 4) Environmental & social responsibility Environmental & social responsibility can be used as political arguments to initiate trade intervention against certain countries. In a shrimp-turtle case, US banned shrimp imports from India, Malaysia, Pakistan & Thailand. Also the shrimp were not harvested from US waters, they were caught using a technique that also accidentally trapped sea turtles, endangered species protected by US. These countries upset & brought the case to WTO, alleging that US invoked an environmental law as a trade barrier.The difference BTW AA & CAWhen one nation is absolutely more efficient in the production of all goods, The Absolute Advantage theory suggests no international trade. Comparative Advantage theory is one step further than the Absolute Advantage theory. In the production of all goods, what might happen when one nation has an absolute advantage? By CA theory, it makes sense for any country to specialize in the production of those goods that it produces most efficiently and to buy the goods that it produces less efficiently from other countries. III) International Monetary system 1. Evolution of International Monetary systemAfter studying the outline of the basic determinants of exchange rates, we need to trace the history of the three era of the evolution of the international monetary system and IMF.Gold standardThe Bretton Woods SystemPost-Bretton Woods System IMF

The Gold StandardThe gold standard was a system in place between 1870 and 1914, which the value of most major currencies was maintained by fixing their prices in terms of gold.Gold was used as the common denominator for all currencies. Thai Gold Thai Money Supply Thai Products Price Germany Products Price

Thai Export Thai Import GermanyThailandGoldExportImport Thai Gold Thai Money Supply Thai Products Price Germany Products Price

Thai Export Thai Import GermanyThailand GoldExportImportThe Bretton Woods System 1944~1973The gold standard was abandoned in 1914 when World War I broken out and several combatant countries printed excessive amounts of currencies to finance their war efforts. After World War I, especially during the Great Depression 1929-1933), countries engaged in competitive devaluations in an effort to boost exports at the expense of trading partners. The Mount Washington Hotel Bretton Woods, NH, USA @US$180~

Historical back groundCordell Hull, the United States Secretary of State from 1933 to 1944, believed that the fundamental causes of the two world wars lay in economic discrimination and trade warfare. Specifically, he had in mind the trade and exchange controls. He arranged to have a conference for this purpose at Bretton Woods. By the end of World War II, USA became incontrovertibly the world's dominant economic-military power. In 1945, U.S. held $26 billion=60% of world gold reserves.So, USA controlled all discussions based on their ideas at the conference. The idea of Harry Dexter White from USA was adapted and the almost idea of John Maynard Keynes from UK was declined.

H. D. WhiteJ. M. KeynsThe strange story on Harry Dexter White.

No one knows TRUE or NOT.Harry Dexter White: the man behind Bretton Woods, the World Bank and the IMF was a Soviet Spy Harry Dexter White (1892 1948) was an American economist and senior U.S. Treasury department official. He was a primary mover behind the Bretton Woods Conference, the formations of the World Bank and the IMF . On July 31, 1948 Elizabeth Bentley - a former Soviet Union Spy herself who defected Soviet Intelligence in 1945 - told the House Committee on Un-American Activities that Harry Dexter White had been involved in espionage activities on behalf of Soviet Union during World War II, and had passed sensitive Treasury documents to Soviet agents. Bentley insisted that White, acting on instructions from the Soviet Union, pressured the Treasury Department to give the Soviet Union plates for printing German occupation currency.Harry Dexter White denied before HUAC on August 13, 1948 and died three days later of a heart attack. (Suicide or Killed) Nixon Shock in 1971In 1971, US unilaterally announced that the dollar was no longer convertible into gold.The Bretton Woods System had been built on two conditions;1. US inflation rate had to be low2. US could not run a trade deficitWhen both of these conditions were violated, it would be very difficult to continue this system.

40 years after from Nixon ShockAugust 15, 2011 was the 40 years anniversary of Nixon Shock.August 15, 1971, US President Nixon suddenly decided not to change gold with US dollars. It was the end of the fixed rate. In 1973, we are facing unstable currency situation by floating rate system. Now many countries increase their gold reserve instead of US dollars.The Post- Bretton Woods System 1973~Present1. In the 1960s , US increased government spending in order to finance both the Vietnam War & Great Society Welfare program not by taxation but by money supply.2. In 1971, US had the first post-1945 trade deficit because of the rapid increase of productivity in Japan & Germany. US dollar value YEN & Mark value

Marks = US$1 21 June 1948 3.3318 September 1949 4.20 6 March 1961 429 October 1969 3.6730 December1998 1.673*