Upload
sylvia-heather-garrett
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
®
Flats Sequencing SystemUpdate
Managers of Delivery Programs SupportMarch 5, 2008
AgendaAgenda
Flat Volume
Phase 1 Deployment Update
Dulles Pre-production Operation
Mailing Industry Changes / Update
Field Implementation
Annual Flats Volume Annual Flats Volume
Periodicals17%
First-Class Mail8% Standard Mail
75%Standard Mail
75%
FY 2007
52 Billion FlatsFY 2007
52 Billion FlatsFY 2006
54 Billion FlatsFY 2006
54 Billion Flats
Percent Change
-3.3%
Class Breakdown Unchanged
Flat Volume – Class Breakdown FY 2008 Flat Volume – Class Breakdown FY 2008
7%
17%
53%
22%
1%
F irs t-C lass Mail
P eriodicals
S tandard Mail w/o S at
S aturation
Other
Periodicals
Standard w/o Saturation
Saturation
First-Class
Other
Post Rate Case Flat Volume ComparisonPost Rate Case Flat Volume Comparison
May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan
SPLY 4,452,181 4,120,631 3,850,627 4,655,927 4,696,848 5,831,920 5,188,039 3,941,061 4,423,839
2007/08 4,173,155 3,650,039 3,743,145 4,264,392 4,038,751 4,985,502 4,727,329 3,521,277 3,950,168
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
Pie
ces (0
00)
Total Flat VolumePost Rate Case - SPLY Comparison
-6.3
-11.4 -2.8
-8.4-14.0
-14.5
-8.9
-10.7
-10.7
Post Rate Case Flat Volume ComparisonPost Rate Case Flat Volume Comparison
May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan
SPLY 369,516 346,908 329,316 363,757 340,617 379,740 368,600 324,958 376,242
2007/08 343,128 305,531 300,131 312,596 289,177 330,067 314,603 276,765 308,812
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
Pie
ces (0
00)
First Class Flat VolumePost Rate Case - SPLY Comparison
-7.1
-11.9-8.9
-14.1-15.1
-13.1-14.6
-14.8
-17.9
Post Rate Case Flat Volume ComparisonPost Rate Case Flat Volume Comparison
May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan
SPLY 747,635 778,010 628,246 756,208 741,440 752,113 713,028 679,234 750,075
2007/08 734,039 711,025 641,347 728,284 701,403 787,593 700,359 683,598 741,601
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
Pie
ces (0
00)
Periodical Flat VolumePost Rate Case - SPLY Comparison
-1.8-8.6
2.1
-3.7-5.4
4.7
-1.8 .6
-1.1
Post Rate Case Flat Volume ComparisonPost Rate Case Flat Volume Comparison
May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan
SPLY 3,290,042 2,950,056 2,836,093 3,469,809 3,565,234 4,647,268 4,056,020 2,883,294 3,243,473
2007/08 3,052,420 2,590,146 2,751,701 3,157,044 3,000,497 3,818,013 3,659,999 2,511,388 2,853,394
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
4,000,000
4,500,000
5,000,000
Pie
ces (0
00)
Standard Flat VolumePost Rate Case - SPLY Comparison
-7.2
-12.2-3.0
-9.0-15.8
-17.8
-9.8
-12.9
-12.0
YTD - FY 2008 SPLY Comparison YTD - FY 2008 SPLY Comparison
First-Class Periodicals Standard Total Flats
FY 2007 1,218,398 2,908,756 12,917,249 17,241,789
FY 2008 1,449,540 2,894,450 14,830,056 19,384,859
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
Vo
lum
e (
Pie
ces 000)
Flat Volume by Class & Total Volume SPLY Comparison
FY 2008 YTD vs. SPLY Flat Volume Comparison Oct - Jan
FY 2007
FY 2008
-15.9
-11.1
0.5
-12.9
Cased Flats FY 08 vs. SPLY Comparison Cased Flats FY 08 vs. SPLY Comparison
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
SPLY 3,322,648,181 3,534,217,610 2,526,864,861 2,849,986,414 2,544,027,675
FY 2008 3,163,957,132 3,237,171,104 2,457,106,049 2,683,634,574 2,466,927,104
-
500,000,000
1,000,000,000
1,500,000,000
2,000,000,000
2,500,000,000
3,000,000,000
3,500,000,000
4,000,000,000
Vo
lum
e (P
iece
s)
FY 2008 vs. SPLY Case Flats (City Delivery)
SPLY
FY 2008
-4.8% -8.4%
-2.8%-5.8%
-3.0%
Flats by Product Class: RPW (Qtr 1 2006 - Qtr 4 2007)Flats by Product Class: RPW (Qtr 1 2006 - Qtr 4 2007)
-20.0% -15.0% -10.0% -5.0% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0%
1
2
3
4
Qu
arte
r
First-Class Periodicals Standard
Seasonal variation from yearly average
Flats by Product Class: RPW (Qtr 1 2006 - Qtr 4 2007)Flats by Product Class: RPW (Qtr 1 2006 - Qtr 4 2007)
Normalized to single FSS machine
68%188.7Standard
21%59.0Periodicals
11%29.9First-Class
%Vol (000)
68%188.7Standard
21%59.0Periodicals
11%29.9First-Class
%Vol (000)
69%181.5Standard
21%54.4Periodicals
10%26.0First-Class
%Vol (000)
69%181.5Standard
21%54.4Periodicals
10%26.0First-Class
%Vol (000)
Qtr 4 (Jul – Sep)
Qtr 2 (Jan – Mar)
72%230.3Standard
19%59.0Periodicals
9%29.6First-Class
%Vol (000)
72%230.3Standard
19%59.0Periodicals
9%29.6First-Class
%Vol (000)
66%172.4Standard
23%61.9Periodicals
11%28.2First-Class
%Vol (000)
66%172.4Standard
23%61.9Periodicals
11%28.2First-Class
%Vol (000)
Qtr 3 (Apr – Jun)
Qtr 1 (Oct – Dec)
69%193.2Standard
21%58.9Periodicals
10%28.4First-Class
%Vol (000)
69%193.2Standard
21%58.9Periodicals
10%28.4First-Class
%Vol (000)
Yearly Average
FSS Candidate Volume
Phase 1 Deployment Phase 1 Deployment
29 Districts
33 Processing Facilities (FSS Locations)
● 28 Existing Processing Centers
● 5 New Facility Project (Integrated FSS Space)
2 - 5 Systems per Facility
1,500 Zones, or more
Phase 1 FSS Deployment SitesPhase 1 FSS Deployment Sites
Area Districts#
FSSPlants / Facility
NYM
Northern NJ
Long Island NY
Central NJ
4
3
3
NJ BMC
Mid Island NY P & DC
Trenton NJ P & DC
NE
Boston
Massachusetts
Connecticut
SE New England
3
4
5
3
Northwest Boston P & DC
Middlesex Essex P & DC
Springfield BMC
Providence RI P & DC
EA Columbus 3 Former Columbus P & DC
SESouth FloridaAtlantaCentral Florida
544
New Miami Facility ProjectAtlanta BMCOrlando P & DC
WE
Colorado / Wyoming
Arizona
Mid America
5
5
2
Denver P & DC
New West Valley (Phoenix) Facility Project
Kansas City P & DC
Phase 1 FSS Deployment SitesPhase 1 FSS Deployment Sites
Area Districts#
FSSPlants / Facility
PA
Los Angeles
Sacramento
Bay-Valley/San Francisco
Sierra Coastal
Santa Ana
San Diego
2344232
Herb Peck AnnexSacramento P & DCSan Jose P & DCVan Nuys Main OfficeAnaheim P & DCNew Aliso Viejo Facility ProjectNew Perris DPC Facility Project
CM
Greensboro
Northern VARichmondCapital
22442
Raleigh P & DCGreensboro P & DCDulles P & DCNew Richmond Facility ProjectCurseen-Morris P & DC
GL
Greater Indiana
Northern IL
Central IL
Southeast MI
232222
Indianapolis MPAPalatine P & DCCarol Stream P & DCFox Valley P & DCSouth Suburban P & DCNew Royal Oak Facility Project
Dulles VA P & DCPre-production Operation UpdateDulles VA P & DCPre-production Operation Update
Dulles Pre-production StatusDulles Pre-production Status
Install Complete Oct 2007
● Integration/ Machine Testing Nov 2007
● Live Mail Ramp-up Dec 2007
● Second Zone Added Jan 2008
● Field Pre-Test/Test Feb/Mar 2008
● Full Machine Ramp Up May 2008
18
Dulles FSS Installed & Sequencing FlatsDulles FSS Installed & Sequencing Flats
19
Dulles FSS Installed & Sequencing FlatsDulles FSS Installed & Sequencing Flats
Dulles Live Mail Ramp-upDulles Live Mail Ramp-up
21
Dulles Stand Alone Mail Prep (SAMP)Dulles Stand Alone Mail Prep (SAMP)
22
Dulles AFSM 100 Dolly InductionDulles AFSM 100 Dolly Induction
Dulles Live Mail Ramp-upDulles Live Mail Ramp-up
Reston VA, Zones 20190 and
20194 Started December 4th
● December Low Flat Volumes
● Runs Have Exceeded 40K
● Taking DPS Flats to the Street
Fairfax VA, Zones 22030
Started Jan 22nd
● Runs Have Exceeded 40K
● Taking DPS Flats to the Street
Testing and Ongoing Zone Ramp-up in MarchTesting and Ongoing Zone Ramp-up in March
24
Dulles Pre-production OperationDulles Pre-production Operation
Operational for 1 Year December & January Zones:
● Reston 20194 and 20190
● Fairfax 22030
March and Beyond● Burke 22015
● Culpepper 22701
● McLean 22101
● Alexandria Belleview 22307
● Alexandria Engleside 22309
● Falls Church 22043 and 22046
● Sterling 20164
25
Mailing Industry ConcernsMailing Industry Concerns
1. Address Location / Address Construction
2. Mail Entry
• Entry Points
• Critical Entry Times
3. Mail Prep in FSS Environment
26
Standard Address Construction / PlacementStandard Address Construction / Placement
Federal Register Proposed Rule
● Published 10/10/07
● Comment Period Through 12/10/07
● Final Rule Targeted in the Next 30 to 45 Days
Address Construction / Barcode
• 11-Digit POSTNET or IMB Barcode
• Minimum 8-point Type (approximately 1/10-inch high)
• Address Lines Cannot Touch or Overlap
• No More Than 3 Blank Spaces
27
Standard Address PlacementStandard Address Placement
Orient Address Location for Carrier Street Handling
• Parallel or perpendicular to top edge
• Cannot be upside down in relation to top edge
Joh
n D
oe
123 M
ain
St
An
ywh
ere, US
A 12
345
Joh
n D
oe
123
Ma
in S
tA
nyw
her
e, U
SA
12
345
Can face left or right
John Doe123 Main StAnywhere, USA 12345
Can be left or right justified, or centered.
Basic Standards
Specific Standards
Bound or Folded Pieces
• If parallel to top edge, entire address block within top half
• If perpendicular to top edge, one edge within 2.5 inches of top
Enveloped or Polywrapped
• No “bound edge” applies- top is either shorter edge
• Inserts must be secured
Both
• Address block must be at least 1 inch closer to the top than to the bottom
28
Mail EntryMail Entry
Number of Entry Points?
Critical Entry Times (CET’s)?
● Service Measurement Proposal
National Standardized CET’s
Standard Mail and Package Services
Local CET’s
First-Class Mail and Periodicals
Local Operating Conditions
What About CET’s for FSS?
29
PreparationPreparation
What Prep Changes Will be Needed?
• Current State → Future State
• Transition from CR-RT to FSS Schemes
How and When to Transition to FSS Environment?
What is Being Considered Now?
• MTAC Workgroup 115
• Bulk Flats Processor / Bundle Make-up
• USPS Looking at End-to-End Flats Flow and Data Exchange
• Federal Register Proposed Rule – Address Facing for Presort Bundles on Pallets
Field Integration Strategy / PlanningField Integration Strategy / Planning
FieldImplementationInfrastructure
FieldImplementationInfrastructure
Road MapRoad Map CommunicationCommunication TrainingTrainingReadiness
SupportTracking
ReadinessSupportTracking
Area Leadership
Area FSS Program Manager
Area FSS Team
District Leadership
District FSS Coordinator
District FSS Team
Facility Activation / Construction POAC (where warranted)
Microsoft Project Plans “District Implementation”
Space Readiness: Construction, Equip Migration, Install Plans
Guidelines:
• Policies• Integrated
Logistic Support Plan
• Methods Guide• Vendor
Training• FSS
Certification• Standardization• Lean Principles• Delivery
Readiness
Executive Level Communication & Briefings
Site Level Tactical Communication
• General Business Knowledge
• Change Management
• Functional Impacts
• Technical Impacts
Communication Tools
• Training• Stand-up Talks• Posters• Websites• DVDs / Videos
Area & District Project Manager Training – Grow Project Leaders
Dulles On-site Functional Training
Vendor Developed Training & (administered at local level)
USPS Developed Training (administered at local level)
District Readiness Assessments
• Processing• Delivery• Maintenance• Space
Readiness Reviews (Headquarters, and/or Areas)
Standardization / Certifications
Leave Behind Plant Resource s: Maint. Support
Capture Savings
Communicating Change
Corporate
Line Supervisors
MDOs, Postmasters& Station Managers
In-Plant , OPS & Support Functions
Area &District Leadership
Media, Resources, & TrainingKnowledge / Technical Information
CraftJob Instructions
Operating Policies & Procedures
Comprehensive Operating Knowledge
Strategies, Operating Basics & Policies
Strategies & General Knowledge
Comprehensive Operating Knowledge, Planning, Program Management & Policies
Job Aids & Training
Handbooks, Visuals, Videos, Quick Reference Guides & Training
Tools, Handbooks, Graphics, Videos & Training
FSS Overview & Understanding Materials
Strategic Transformation Plan & Presentations
Tools, Handbooks, Planning Models, Project Plans, Graphics, Videos & Training
Pla
nnin
g &
Rea
dine
ss
Day-to-D
ay
32
Field ImplementationField Implementation
Field Resources / Infrastructure
● Area FSS Program Managers
● District FSS Coordinators
● REATLs – FSS Impacted Districts
Field Resource Training
● Major Program Management / Project Leaders
Delivery/Customer Service Planning & Readiness Sessions
● Competed in January
FSS University – Leverage Dulles Pre-production Operation
● Beginning March 2008
● Cross-functional Classroom, Workroom Floor & Hands-on Experience
33
Field Implementation Planning – In ProgressField Implementation Planning – In Progress
Line Manager & Supervisor Training Strategy
● Comprehensive Operating Knowledge
● Effectively Implement Change
Craft Training Strategy
● Standardization
● Training Within Industry (TWI)
● Toyota Talent
Readiness Assessment Process
● Utilize Cross-Functional Focus Group to Define Process
34 Begin FSS Planning Activities