20
1 結合 結合 結合 結合 Kano 模式與 模式與 模式與 模式與 IPA 分析探討 分析探討 分析探討 分析探討 3C 家電連鎖產 家電連鎖產 家電連鎖產 家電連鎖產 業之關鍵服務品質屬性 業之關鍵服務品質屬性 業之關鍵服務品質屬性 業之關鍵服務品質屬性以全國電子為例 以全國電子為例 以全國電子為例 以全國電子為例 摘要 本研究以PZB缺口模式為基礎,應用SERVQUAL量表作為發展問卷之架 構,針對3C產業顧客的觀點,透過結合Kano模式與IPA分析檢視全國電子服務品 質之關鍵屬性,試圖找出影響顧客滿意度之原因,以及提出強化競爭優勢品質屬 性與擬定改善競爭弱項品質屬性的優先順序與方案,以作為全國電子策略執行之 參考。研究結果發現,全國電子在服務品質屬性的22個題項之中,共有8項品質 屬性為主要競爭優勢來源,6項品質屬性為主要競爭劣勢來源。 關鍵詞 關鍵詞 關鍵詞 關鍵詞:PZB 缺口模式、SERVQUAL 量表、Kano 模式、IPA 分析、 3C 家電連鎖產業 壹、 引言 隨著數位資訊時代的來臨,加上國人生活水準的提升,以及對生活品質的 要求, 3C 產品已經逐漸融入於社會大眾的生活之中。現代人對消費產品的要求, 必須兼具功能、外觀、時尚與流行等因素的考量,使得消費者對於 3C 產品的需 求趨向複雜化,企業亦朝向多元化產品整合銷售的方向發展。 一、研究背景 傳統以單店、單點銷售模式經營的家電經銷商,已經無法滿足消費者對於 3C 產品龐大的需求(謝維雄,2003)。由於 3C 產品具有産品生命週期短、産品規 格統一且替代性極高、價格變動快速、產品變化多樣、消費者忠誠度較低、個人 消費需求導向與高度替代性等特性( 林祖得與樂以媛,2001) ,再加上 3C 業者 所提供的產品同質性高,差異化建立不易,在競爭白熱化的情況之下,業者因此 展開激烈的價格競爭,紛紛推出促銷活動來吸引消費者(陳志維,2005)。可是, 當我們回頭思索整體的企業經營方向,價格折扣確實能有效影響消費者的購買行 為,不過實際檢視消費者的長期消費行為卻發現消費者所關心的還有比降價更吸

結合 Kano 模式與 IPA 分析探討 3C 家電連鎖產 業之關鍵服務品 …thesis.topco-global.com/TopcoTRC/PDF/2008Thesis/Thesis/B010088.pdf · 1 結合 Kano 模式與 IPA

  • Upload
    lyanh

  • View
    232

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

Kano IPA 3C

PZBSERVQUAL

3CKanoIPA

228

6

PZB SERVQUAL Kano IPA

3C

3C

3C

3C(2003) 3C

(2001) 3C

(2005)

2

(2004)

3C

(2006)

(Parasuraman et al., 1985, 1988)

(Kotler, 1988)

(Matzler et al., 2004)

3C

3C

3C

()

() Kano

()

(Importance-Performance Analysis, IPA) Kano

()

() 3C

3C

3CPDA

3C

3

(Consumer)(Communication)

(Computer)(2003)

()

(1984)

Mason et al. (1991)

Gronin and

Taylor (1992)

Anderson et al. (1994)

()

(Crosby, 1979)

(Sasser et al., 1978)Parasuraman et al. (1985)(1)

(Intangibility)

(2)(Inseparability)

(3)

(Heterogeneity)

(4)(Disappearance)

(Garvin, 1984)

4

Parasuraman et al. (1985)

()

Parasuraman, et al. (1985)

PZB

Parasuraman et al. (1988) PZB

5

22 SERVQUAL

SERVQUAL

PZB (1985)

PZB (1988)

Parasuraman et al. (1988)

Kano

(Tontini and Silveira, 2005) Kano

5

()

(Herzberg)

(Motivator-Hygiene

Theory) (Herzberg et al., 1959)

(No Satisfaction)(No Dissatisfaction)

(Kondo, 2001)

(Noriaki Kano)

(Attractive Quality Creation)

Kano(Kano et al., 1984)

()Kano

Kano

()(Kano et al., 1984)

(1)(Attractive Quality Element, A)

(2)(One-Dimensional Quality Element, O)

(3)(Must-Be Quality Element, M)

(4)(Indifferent Quality Element, I)

6

(5)(Reverse Quality Element, R)

Kano(Kano et al. (1984))

Kondo (2001)

(Shen et al., 2000)

() Kano

Kano

(Kano et al., 1984)Matzler et al. (1996)

(I like it that way)

(It must be that way )(I am neutral)(I can live with

it that way)(I dislike it that way)

7

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Kano

(Anderson and Mittal, 2000)

Matzler and Hinterhuber (1998)

()

Kano(Matzlar and Hinterhuber (1998))

Gitlow (1998-99)

Kano category = maximum (A, O, M)(AOM) > (IQR)

Kano category = maximum ( I, Q, R)(AOM) (IQR)(A)

(O)(M)(I)(R)

(Q)

()

Kano

8

(1996)

(Matzler and Hinterhuber,

1988)Tan and Pawitra (2001)Kano

Kano

()

(Sampson and Showalter, 1999)

()-

IPAMartilla and James (1977)

9

Marr (1986) IPA

()-

Martilla and James (1977) IPA

Hollenhorst et al. (1992) IPA

(Overall Mean) IPA

IPA

() IPA

IPA

(Martilla and James, 1977; Zhang and Chow, 2004)(1) I

(Keep up the Good Work)(2) II

(Possible Overkill)

(3) III

IV(Low

Priority)(4) IV

(Concentrate Here)

IPA(Martilla and James (1977))

10

() IPA

IPA(benchmarking)

IPA

Garver (2003)

IPA

(Hansen and Bush, 1999)

Chen

and Su (2006) Kano-CKM

Kano()

15

15

Chen and Su (2006)Kano

(Perceived Importance-Performance Analysis, P-IPA) IPA

Kano

P-IPA

()

Kano

SERVQUAL(

) 22

11

3C

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

(6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

(11) (12) (13)

(14) (15) () (16) (17) (18)

(19) (20) (21) (22)

3C

2007 7 22 8 4 14 210

13 197 93.8%

Cronbach's

(Cronbach, 1951)Nunnally (1967)

0.5 Kaiser (1974)

(Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin, KMO)KMO 0

1 1

12

197 11

21 30 (53.8%) 31 40 (29.4%)

(26.9%)(15.2%)

24(49.7%) 2(20.8%)

01

(87.8%) 23(11.2%) 6(1.0%)

SPSS 12

3C

Cronbach's 0.5

SERVQUAL

22 KMO 0.720

Bartlett 10888.690 P

()

KMO Bartlett

3C

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin 0.720

0.537 0.761 0.819

0.727 0.769 0.863

10888.690

0.676 0.747 0.725

0.691 0.745 0.825 3828

0.669 0.865 0.854

0.860 0.911 0.944

Bartlett

0.000

13

5

P-IPA

3C

15

15 3C

/

(1) 4.3604 3.0609 3.2335 0.9466

(2) 4.3959 3.1675 3.4721 0.9123

(3) 4.1929 3.6548 3.4569 1.0572

(4) 4.2538 3.3655 3.4619 0.9722

(5) 4.1421 3.3452 3.6497 0.9166

(6) 4.5228 3.4924 3.3706 1.0361

(7) 4.4518 3.3553 3.2335 1.0377

(8) 4.5127 3.3198 3.2183 1.0315

(9) 4.3909 3.4416 3.2284 1.0660

(10) 4.5381 3.3858 3.2741 1.0341

(11) 4.5482 3.3706 3.2893 1.0247

(12) 4.4061 3.4518 3.1980 1.0794

(13) 4.2893 3.2538 3.0406 1.0701

(14) 4.1472 3.2843 3.2437 1.0125

(15)() 3.9848 3.6294 3.3503 1.0833

(16) 4.3503 3.2487 3.0508 1.0649

(17) 4.5330 3.3858 3.1574 1.0723

(18) 4.1168 3.0914 3.1066 0.9951

(19) 4.3503 3.1421 3.1117 1.0098

(20) 4.1168 3.2589 3.0660 1.0629

(21) 4.5178 3.1523 3.0558 1.0316

(22) 4.4975 3.1523 3.1320 1.0065 4.3463 3.3186 3.2455 1.0238

14

P-IPA 3.3186 (Y )

4.3463 (X )

I 8

II 4 III 4

IV 6

P-IPA()

P-IPA

1

1(Garver, 2003)

1 (Y ) 4.3463 (X )

17

5

P-IPA()

15

Kano

Kano22

87

43

Kano

Kano

A O M I R Q

(1)

62 29 27 79 0 0 A

(2) 31 55 69 42 0 0 M (3) 33 24 40 100 0 0 I (4) 14 43 91 49 0 0 M

(5) 47 19 21 110 0 0 I (6) 19 94 71 13 0 0 O (7) 26 69 71 30 1 0 M (8) 28 81 51 37 0 0 O (9)

51 43 48 54 1 0 A

(10) 47 66 45 39 0 0 O (11)

57 60 40 40 0 0 O

(12) 39 57 51 50 0 0 O

(13)

48 49 37 63 0 0 O

(14) 55 25 33 84 0 0 A (15)() 53 29 13 99 3 0 I (16) 73 40 17 67 0 0 A

(17) 19 93 67 18 0 0 O

(18) 71 27 11 88 0 0 A (19)

82 25 21 69 0 0 A

(20) 56 24 18 99 0 0 I (21) 54 64 32 47 0 0 O

(22) 77 51 13 56 0 0 A

AOMI

16

Kano P-IPA P-IPA

Kano

P-IPA

Kano() P-IPA

()

P-IPA()

3C

3C

()

: (6)

(7)(8)(9)

(10)

(11)(12)

(17) 8

(9)

()

: (1)

(2)(16)

(19)(21)

(22) 6

(2)

17

P-IPA P-IPA

A (9) (6) (8) (10) (11) (12)

O

(17) M (7)

AOM

M (4) (3) (5)

I

(15) ()

(14) A (18)

O (13) I (20)

(1) (16) (19)

A

(22) O (21) M (2)

MOA

18

Anderson, E. W., C. Fornell., and D. R. Lehmann (1994), Customer Satisfaction,

Market Share and Profitability: Findings from Sweden, Journal of Marketing, 58

(2), pp. 112-122.

Anderson, E. W. and V. Mittal (2000), Strengthening the Satisfaction-Profit Chain,

Journal of Service Research, 3 (2), pp. 107-1290.

Chen, Y. H. and C. T. Su (2006), A Kano-CKM Model for Customer Knowledge

Discovery, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 17 (5), pp.

589-608.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951), Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Test,

Psychometrika, 16 (3), pp. 297-334.

Crosby, P. B., (1979), Quality is Free: the Art of Making Quality Creation, New York:

American Library.

Garver, M. S. (2003), Best Practices in Identifying Customer-Drive Improvement

Opportunities, Industrial Marketing, 32 (6), pp. 455-466.

Garvin, D. A. (1984), What does Product Quality Really Mean, Sloan Management

Review, 26, pp. 25- 43.

Gitlow, H. S. (1998-99), Innovation on Demand, Quality Engineering, 11 (1), pp.

79-89.

Gronin, J. T., and S. A. Taylor (1992), Measuring Service Quality: a Reexamination

and Extension, Journal of Marketing, 56 (3), pp. 55-68.

Hansen, E., and R. J. Bush (1999), Understanding Customer Quality Requirements:

Model and Application, Industrial Marketing Management, 28 (2), pp. 119-130.

Herzberg. P., B. Mausner, and B. B. Snyderman (1959), The Motivation to Work,

New York: Wiley.

Hollenhorst, S., D. Olson, and R. Fortney (1992), Use of Importance-Performance

Analysis to Evaluate State Park Cabins: the Case of the West Virginia State Park

System, Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 10 (1), pp. 1-11.

Kaiser, H. F. (1974), An Index of Factorial Simplicity, Psychometrika, 39 (1), pp.

31-36.

19

Kano, N., N. Seraku, F. Takahashi, and S. Tsuji (1984), Attractive Quality and

Must-Be Quality, Hinshitsu (Quality, The Journal of the Japanese Society for

Quality Control), 14 (2), pp. 39-48.

Kondo, Y. (2001), Customer Satisfaction: How Can I Measure It? Total Quality

Management, 12 (7-8), pp. 867-872.

Kotler, P. (1988), Marketing Management Analysis, Planning, Implementation and

Control, 6th

Edition, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Martilla, J. A., and J. C. James (1977), Importance-Performance Analysis, Journal

of Marketing, 41 (1), pp. 77-79.

Marr, J. W. (1986), Letting the Customer be the Judge of Quality, Quality Progress,

19 (10), pp. 46-49.

Mason, B. J., L. M. Morris, and F. E. Hazel (1991), Retailing, 4th

Edition, New York:

Business Publishing.

Matzler, K., H. H. Hinterhuber, F. Bailom, and E. Sauerwein (1996), How to Delight

Your Customers, Journal of Product and Brand Management, 5, pp. 6-18.

Matzler, K. and H. H. Hinterhuber (1998), How to Make Product Development

Projects More Successful by Integrating Kanos Model of Customer Satisfaction

into Quality Function Deployment, Technovation, 18 (1), pp. 25-38.

Matzler, K., F. Bailom, H. H. Hinterhuber, B. Renzl, and J. Pichler (2004), The

Asymmetric Relationship between Attribute-Level Performance and Overall

Customer Satisfaction: A Reconsideration of the Importance-Performance

Analysis, Industrial Marketing Management, 33 (4), pp. 271-277.

Nunnally, J. (1967), Psychometric Methods, McGraw-Hill.

Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry (1985), A Conceptual Model of

Service Quality and its Implications for Future Research, Journal of Marketing,

49, pp. 41-50.

Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry (1988), SERVQUAL: a Multiple

Item Scale for Measuring Customer Perceptions of Service Quality, Journal of

Retailing, 64 (1), pp. 12-40.

Sampson, S. E. and M. J. Showalter (1999), The Performance-Importance Response

Function: Observations and Implications, Service Industries Journal, 19 (3), pp.

20

1-25.

Sasser, W. E., R. P. Olsen, and D. D. Wyckoff (1978), Management of Service

Operations: Text, Cases, and Readings, Allyn & Bacon.

Shen, X.X., K. C. Tan, and M. Xie (2000), An Integrated Approach to Innovative

Product Development Using Kano's Model and QFD, European Journal of

Innovation Management, 3 (2), pp. 91-99.

Tan K. C. and T. A. Pawitra (2001), Integrating SERVQUAL and Kanos Model into

QFD for Service Excellence Development, Managing Service Quality, 11 (6), pp.

418-430.

Tontini, G. and A. Silveira (2005), Identification of Critical Attributes of Success in

Products and Services: An Alternative to Importance-Performance Analysis, In:

Proceedings of the 2005 BALAS Annual Conference, pp. 1-20.

Zhang, H. Q. and I. Chow (2004), Application of Importance-Performance Model in

Tour Guides Performance: Evidence from Mainland Chinese Outbound Visitors

in Hong Kong, Tourism Management, 25 (1), pp. 81-91.

(2004)

3C

(2005)3C

(2006)

3C

(1996)?26966-67

(2003)3C2003198-201

(1984)-

(2001)--3CFIND

2001 8 16

http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=trend&id=1173