27
TAP:TECHNOLOGYASSISTED PSYCHIATRY Introducing telepsychiatry into an Emergency Department service Dr Kezia Lange and Dr Kathleen Kelly, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust

ã - King's Fund

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ã - King's Fund

TAP: TECHNOLOGY ASSISTED PSYCHIATRYIntroducing telepsychiatry into an Emergency Department service

Dr Kezia Lange and Dr Kathleen Kelly, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust

Page 2: ã - King's Fund
Page 3: ã - King's Fund

Quantifying the reluctance

Page 4: ã - King's Fund

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Patients MH staff ED staff

How likely are you to recommend using this sort of technology to patients?

Extremelyunlikely/Unlikely

Likely/Extremelylikely

Neither unlikelyor likely/Don'tknow

Page 5: ã - King's Fund

0% 50% 100%

ED staff

MH staff

Patients

How confident do you think you would be that the EDPS clinician had gathered sufficient information

from the video assessment, as compared to a face-to-face assessment?

Not at all confidentNot very confidentQuite confidentVery confident

Page 6: ã - King's Fund
Page 7: ã - King's Fund

Confronting our fears

Page 8: ã - King's Fund
Page 9: ã - King's Fund
Page 10: ã - King's Fund

0% 50% 100%

I was comfortable with using thetechnology, once we got started

I could clearly hear the otherclinician's voice.

I could clearly see the otherclinician.

I felt that the other clinician wasable to express his/her thoughts

and concerns well enough

Strongly AgreeAgreeDisagreeStrongly Disagree

Page 11: ã - King's Fund

Cake, trial and error

Page 12: ã - King's Fund

Success!

Page 13: ã - King's Fund

Success!

44 new assessments• 10 follow-up sessions done via TAP

Page 14: ã - King's Fund

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

16-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+

Age distribution of new assessment patients seen via telepsychiatry (n=44)

Page 15: ã - King's Fund

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Anxiety Eatingdisorder

Low mood Psychosis Suicidalideation

Self-harm

Reason for referral: new assessment patients seen via telepsychiatry (n=44)

Page 16: ã - King's Fund
Page 17: ã - King's Fund

30%

60%

5%

5% 0%

How would you rate your overall experience of using telepsychiatry?

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Extremely Poor

Page 18: ã - King's Fund

It’s brilliant that there is no travel or expense involved. I was nervous as to how this would be but I was really surprised as to how effective it was and how you almost forget that the other person isn't in the same room as you.

Just that it was a great new experience!

Was generally ‘good’ & image & audio were both clear.

I found this extremely useful, convenient and actually enjoyed my session. Thank you.

It really helped me cope with my emotions better

None, really just surprised how personal the experience, was. I was very sceptical when the Doctor told me how they were going to conduct the assessment.

Page 19: ã - King's Fund

36%

64%

0%0%0%

Follow-up patients: How would you rate your overall experience of using telepsychiatry?

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Extremely Poor

Page 20: ã - King's Fund
Page 21: ã - King's Fund

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

How likely are you torecommend using this

technique to friends andfamily?

How likely would you bewilling to use this

technology again?

Clinician feedback new assessments and follow-ups n=50

Extremely likely

Likely

Neither likely norunlikely/Don't know

Unlikely

Extremely unlikely

Page 22: ã - King's Fund

The patient was not fazed by it at all! I was able to still establish a good rapport with her, which had been one of my concerns.

Efficient system; well thought out and convenient.

This was the first time I really felt comfortable with using this technology, before this I had to brace myself a bit before starting, but this time it felt completely comfortable and easy (I think I am used to it now!) and felt like it was just as good as a face-to-face assessment. It saved me over 2 hours of driving time (when I can't do any other work) and the patient was seen far more quickly, and discharged promptly from ED. Many thanks to the ED staff who facilitated the interview.

I do not understand why we are not using more of this technology.

Page 23: ã - King's Fund
Page 24: ã - King's Fund

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Self-harm Suicidal ? Psychosis Other

Reason for referral

TAP

F2F

Page 25: ã - King's Fund

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

%

Where patient discharged to after assessment

TAP

F2F

Page 26: ã - King's Fund

persuading others to ‘give it a go'

Page 27: ã - King's Fund