Federal Register/Vol. 77. No. 135 / Friday, July 13, 2(112 / Rules and Regulations 41279

heallh or on\'iruilnlt;nhd efli,•(:ls, usingiml(:lit:able and h;gally ilermissihh ,

m(;thods, under Executive ()rder 12898(59 I.'R 7629. l"ebruarv 16. I(.I!14).

Irl addition, this ruh; i.h.:s not havc:Irihal implicatiorls as sln:(:ifh:d hvIZxt,(:uti\,(; Order 13175 {Ii5 FR 67249,N(wember 9, 21)00], l)ocause the SIP isn(•t alll)rovt.d i(i apply in Indian counlrvhit:((hid hi Iht; shihl, anti EPA II(Ihls Ihlilil will nol imp-se subslantial dh't:cl(3•sls (Jll h'ibal •l)\.'lnTllllt;nls or ln'et;mplIribal law.

B. Nuhmission to (',on.glY•SS ond lhoComl•troller t'tmem]

The Congrt;ssiunal lit:view Acl, 5tI.S.(:. 8111 ol sty/., as added by lhe Smallllusiness RogulahJry I','l•tfor(:t;iTlt;rilt;airness Acl .f 1996. gl:nl;rally., imwhh;slhat belbre it rule Illa%: lake cffe(:l, lhuagt;ll(:y prumulgaling lhe rule. muslsubmit a ruh: report, which inc]tuh:s acopy (ff Iht; ruh;. h> each H(mst) (.Jr Ihu(:.lllgrt;ss arl(I 1(• the. C(implr(dlt;r Generalof Ihe { Jnih;d .•hlh,'s. FPA will submil art;Imrl conlaining lhis at:lion and otherrequired informal(tin Ill the I.r.S. Sonar(;.lht: I.J.S. House (1t" Relwes(;nhitive,s. :+llldthe (]omplroller ('.el'(era] of lho I lniledShih;s l)ri(u¯ hi pLibiicalion (ll'ltlt: rub; inthe Federal Register. A major rulecanJ]ol take' t;ff(;('t t, nti] 60 days afk;r itis published in the Federal RegisterThis aclic,n is nol a "mai(•r ru]O" itschd'h]ell I11' 5 I I.S.C. 1t114(2).

C. Petitions _for Judk'iul llevk,u

Admiriislraha" cd" Ihis final rule does nolaffecl the finality nf this acli•m fi•r lhepurposes of judicial rt;viow nor doc;s itt;xh;nd lhe limt: wilhin which a imlitionf-r judicial review may be fih•d, aridshall n,•t l)(Jslp(nlt; the tffft)clivexlt:SS t Jrsuch ru]t; or aclion.

This aclilm, ln;rhlining hJ Maryland'sR-X(Tr imwisi.ns t'•r N()x and VO(]swith rt.'sp(,cl h.• Iho 1997 8-hour ozonomax, mfl be chalh)ngt.:d lale.," int)roct;edings Io t.'n ftJrCt; ils rcquirenlenls.(Set! s!:(:li(,n 3117{b}(2).)

List (if Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Erivirorime.rlhtl l)r()tec:ti,m, Airpollulitm conlrol, Incurporalicm b\'rtd'er!:nce, Nilmgen dli•xiih:, ()zlm(.•,Rt;t)orling alld recordket;i)irigre(luiremenls. V(llatih; t,lNani(:(;onlt)( lUl'l(tS,

Authority: 42 II.,"g.( L 7401 el st•q.I)ah'd: ]11np 27,2012.

W.C. Early.Acting I?t•it,nt(I AdminiMrttlt,r, Ih?.ion IlL

'l'li,;reli•re, 40 (]I"R part 52 is amendt;(lits follows:

PART 52•AMENDED]

¯ 1. The aulhoril\, cilati( ,ri 171r 40 CFR[1art 52 (:orilinues to read as fillhlws:

Authoriiy: 42 11..%(]. 741)1 +.t.•,W.¯ 2. In § 52.1_070. the tab](' in paragraph(el is iimt;nd.d by, adding the t:nlr\, I'•r"RACT umh;r thu 1997 8-hour oztulcN,.\AQS" al Iht,> end (ff Ihe labh; It) rea(Ias !'•d h)ws:

§ 52.1070 Identification of plan., y.. , •¢ %-

the CA/\. Accordirigly, Ihis a('lionmerely l)r,..,llt)ses h) it[)pl'l)Vt; sial(; ]•lw (is

mr.'cling l"ederal requirumenls und Olios11ol inlt)(ise itchlili(nlal rtl(luir(:nlt;lllsI)t:vond those imp(,sed I)1' shilo hlvv. lg)r

lhal rt)as(m, lhis at:lion:¯ Is riot a "signifi(:anl l"eguhil,•ry

ncliru'l'" StlbjCcl h• review I1\, Ihe OH'icei)f Management anti Iludgei un(h;rIAxoculive Ordur 12866 (58 FR 517'.15.()clolmr 4. 1993):

¯ Does riot iml)ose an inl;)rmationc, d hmlion burden u ndt)r I ho pro\'isi(msof lht: Patmrvwn'k I(edut:liori Acl (44I.!.S.C.. 3501 et st•/.}:

¯ Is i:erlifit;(I its ntfl hu\,ing itsigrlifi(:anl (;(:(ml•mi(: iml)a(:l (m asubstantial nttmber of small 0nlitiesun(h:r the Reguluh)ry Fh:xihilily Acl (5[ !.S.(]. 601 ol seq.):

¯ O()t)s 11oi contain anv unfurld(:d

mandah: or signil]canl]y ur uniqu,:l.va['['ecl small gm,ernmenls, as describedin [he lhifunded Mandah:s Reftwm Aclof 1 !),q5 (Pul). L. 1114-4):

¯ Dues ll()l have Federa]isnlimpli(.:al.iuils as Sliecit]lxt in Exo(:uliv(,Orih.;r 13132 (64 FR 43255. Augusl 10,1911(1);

¯ IS I1(11 III1 t Ill nl i-niclilh,., significalilregtii;tlorv aclitJn bas0d on heallh ca"

sa[elv risks suhjt;ci Io E×ecutivc ()i'dm"1,'1045 (62 FR 19885. April 23. 1997);

¯ IS ntll a sigriificanl regulalory acli•ulsubit.,cl hi ExHculive Or(It;r 13211 (1i(i FR211355. Mat, 22. 2001);

¯ ls n.l subiecl m rt;quirt.;merlls ()f.";eClion 1 2((]} Of the NationalTt.'(:hn()hJgy Transfer and Advanct'menlAct of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) becaus(,' l !n(h•r secl i()n 307(b)(1 ) M' the (:Ask.

al)pli(:ali(nl of Ih()se roquiremt;rils would pt;litions for judiciul review of lhisl)e inconsisle[ll wilh Ihe (:Ask: and a(:litul must [)e filed in the I lnihul Slates

¯ DI)(;s nt)l [)rlix, i(h; EPA wilh lh!: (]()i.lrl of Aptmals for the apprt)f)riah:discrt;litinar\, aulhorilv h) address, as circuil l)y Se, t)h;mlmr 11,2012. I"ilinl- aapliroliriale. (lislJr{iliorlitinato human imlilil)n fc)r ro(:( risid .)ralion I)v the (e,) * * *

Name of non-regulatory SIP revision Applicable geographic area Statedate•ubmittal EPA approval date Additionalexplanation

RACT under the 1997 8-hour ozone Statewide ........................................ 10/17/11 7/13/12 [Insert page number whereNAAQS. the document begins].

Ir.'r I),)�.. 2(112- Iti!,i4q I"ih•d 7-12-12:11:45 (sill]

BILUNG CODE •,•ll•--•ilI-P

ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2012-O002; FRL-9695-5]

Approval and Promulgation of AirQuality Implementation Plans;Pennsylvania; Regional Haze StateImplementation Plan

AGENCY: En\,ir(mmenlal ])r()l,)(:li()n

Agency (El)A).ACTION: l"iriul ruh.'.

SUMMARY: Ella is finalizirlg lh(: ]imihnlapprtJval of the Regi()nal Haze SlateImph;mt:rlhition Phm [SIP} (hereaftt:r RHSIP) rt)visil)n sul)milh)d I)y Iht'(]()mml)nwealth 1(t" Penns\,lvania[Pennsylvania}. EPA is htkirig Ihis aclion])0(:at.lse l'e.nnsvlvania's SIP revision, asa whl)h:, sh'erlgthens Iht; P(.'ririsv]vania,"111'. This a(;lilln is bt:ing t;.iklan ina(:(:(irdan(:t: wilh the r(:(luiruments ()f tht;Clc:an Air Act (CAA) and EPA's rules fc)rslah;s h) prevt;nl an(] r()med\, fulur(; andexisling ar)thr()l)(>genic iml•airmenl ,)1'

visibililv in mnndahlrv (:]ass I areas

41280 Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 135 / Friday, July 13, 2012 / Rules and Regulations

through u regional haze program. EI'A isalscl Ul)l)roving this revisi(m as meetingthe infrastructure requirements relatingt(, visihiliiy pr()te(:tion for the 1997 8-hirer t)zonl) Nutitmu] Aml)h;ril AirQualily Standard {NAAQS} and the1!197 und 2006 fine purti(:ulale mutter(PM_,.5} NAAQS.OA'rES: This final rule is effective ,m

August 13. 2012.ADDRESSES: EllA has eslablished a(lo(:kel for lhis uction un(h;r Docket IDNumbtw EPA-ROR-OAR-2012-4)002. Alld(Jcummais in the (h)ck(:l art; list\:(] inthe Wil'W.ff•.,f#,lllolJOrlS.,ff,OV \'Villi site.Mthc)ugh listed in the eleclroni(: (h.mket,some inR)rmation is not publi(:lyavailalih.), i.e., (:()nfi(tenlial husinessi,fformalitm (CBI) or olh(:r inR)rmationwhose dis(:losure is restrict(id hy statute.Certain olher mah)rial, such usc(q)yrighi(Id muhlriul, is m)i ilia(ell (ll'l

the Init.>rn(.q aml will be publiclyavailuhh; \)My in har(l copy furm.l'ubliclv UVili'l•-ii)le dockul materials ui't;

availul)i,; tiiiher eh)(:ironh:allv Ihn)ughWww.rt#glillilioos.gov or in hitrd c(i|)y forpublic insi)eclion (luring normulhusin(:ss hours ill the Air Pr(il(i(:lion

Division. I.I.S. Environmental l)role(:iitm

,\g(mcy. R()gi()n III. 16511 Arch Street.Philadelphia, Pennsylvunia 1•.1103.Copi(;s of the C;ommonweallh'ssul)milta] are available itl thePt;rlnsy]vuniu Deliurimenl ofEnvironmental Proh;(:iion, Bureau tfl' AirQuulily C(mtrol, P.O. Box 11468, 4011Murk\it Sh'eel, Hurrishurg, Pennsylvaniu17105.FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:Mt;lissu Lin(hm, (215) 1114-21196, i)r I)\,

emai] at ]inden.me]issa@(,ptl.gov.SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background"I'hroughoul this document, wh(mever

"we," "US," or "our" iS rise(I, We meanEPA. ()n ]anuurv 26. 2012, EPAi)uhlish(;(i ii n()li(:e \if priil)()sc'(lruh)mukhlg {NI'R) for Pefmsylvania (77I"R 3984}. The NPR pr()p(Jsed ]imih,'(I

alipr(wal (if Pimnsylvania's RH SIP. Thelurmal SIP revision wus submille(i ll\'Ih(i Pt;nnsvlvunia Department (if

Envirtmmenla] l)roh;(:li()n (I'ADEP)(inD(:(:emi)er 20, 2011}. This revlsit)n alsomeets the requirements of CAA se(:lion

1 lO(a)(2){D)(i)(ll)anti (a}(2)(I), r()lating I(1

visibility protection for the 1907 8-h(.)uruztmt; N'AAQS und lht; 1997 arM 2006PM2.5 NAAQS.

II. Summary of SIP RevisionThe SIP revisiurl iricludes a long term

slrlth:gy with enfor(:euhh, ml;asurl;s

ensuring reus(.)llab]t; progress towardsrot:tiling the reus()nal)h; l)r()gress g()alst'()r Ihe first planning lieri()d thr(iugh

21)18. l)tmnsylvania's RH SiP (:ontains

Ihe emissi(tn r(;du(:li(ms nell(hid h)

achieve l'ennsv]vania's share ofenlissit)n redu(:liltns for Ihe Cluss l urilas

they impu(:l. "l'he specific i'¢quirem0nlsill" Ihe CAA un(l EPA's Regi(inul HazeRuh; (64 FR 35714, July 1,1.q.qg) and Iherali(mah; f(ir EPA's i)r(qi(med at'lion ure(;xplained in lhe NI.'R and urv notruslate(l here. EPA received severaliillv(;rse clinlrnilllls al](I i)ll(' le.lh.:r ofsupport on lh(; lltnuur3' 26, 2012 NPR.()ne tff lh()se udv(!rse (:()mm()nls

rt:(luesie(l a (:hange it) I'ADEI"s b(;sl

avai hll)le re.tr(ifit tei:hn{ihlgy (BART)(h;h;rnlinali,.m fi )r Gen(.}n Energy'sCh(;svvi(:k (;tml:rulirig Slalion.ih;rmsvlvania ca,1 r!:vim.' Ihisdeterminatiori in u future SiP revision toi,d(Ir,;ss (:()mmenls raised I)y (',t;nOil

Energy. A summary (if the c()mmenls

suhmilte(I un(l gP/•.'s reslt{mse,s areprovid(:d in section [11 of this di)cumeni.

III. Summary of Publh: Comments andEPA Responses

Commenh EI'A i)roi)ose(l appro\'a] t)f

Pennsvlwmia's RH SiP lin |anuary 26,

2012 •/ith a docket thut in(:ludes most�)f the RH SIP submission frc,m PADEPcx(:(;pl Al)l)endix Z, which is Iht:(.:omment und response document.

Best)onse: I)ADEI ) did not submit anAppundix Z. uor wus il rt,q'erl:ru:ed inthe rulemaking. The PADEP commentand reslmnst) docunlenl is Apl)ondixAA anti t:un hi; f(iui](l in tht; EPA d()i:kel

for lhis at:film, (h)(:kei No. EPA-R();I-

(tAR-2()12-OI)02.

Comment: The t:omlll(.;nler slated thaiPennsylvania hrix 15 BART-eligit)leeh;ctric generating units (E(-;I Is) thaiinclude 28 individual units that areamong the lurgesl unc()nlr()lle(I s,)un:es

fur ililrtigen ()xidcs (NOx) un(I sulfurdiuxid,; (S():). The communler claimedI)ADEI ) did not (:on(lu(:l any five-sh; i)del(wminaliulls f()r IIART Ill lli(;se E(;I Isfor N()x and S()2. It rv.lied upon thepending "cross shih; uir piilhllitin ruh:(CS-\PR) Belier than BART"(leterminatirm.

llospons•r: In today's action, EPA isfinalizing ii limilell aplir(ival t)fl'ennsvl\,ania's RH SIP hused on itsreliance (in the Clean Air Inlerslale Ruh;((lAIR). EI'A did 11ol i)rtqmse to lind thaiparti(:ipali()i'l in the 'rransl)ilrl Rule' isun ulh;rnati\,e 1() BART in this m:titm.EI'A ;i(hln:ss('d thes(; ct,mmunls

concerning Ihe Transporl Ruh; as ri

rlART alh;rnaliw I in a Hrial a(:lilm II'litlv(as pul)lishe(t tm ]une 7, 2012 {77 I"R

i I'he I runsporl Rule is ulso klioviti as tim t:n)ss

Sliile Ah I)olhilhiu Rule {CSAPR1 ,m(t wus I)rollosedby I:l),\ 1o help sllit(• redlilp0 rill' ix)lhiilon m-idalllihi t]A,\ Slalidaids, ,q(.•': 75 FR 45210 (AligUSl 2,

2111 ill {liroliOSill} tllllt 7(1 FR 4112(11• (Ail•llSl II, 21111]

{llrial rule),

33t142). EI)A's r()sp()Fme Io Ihesec()mm(mls (:an It(; I'(lund in Do(:k()l IDNo. EPA-HQ-(_)AR-2011-0729 atwww.r•.,guhtlions.gov.

(;omtn¢:nt: The (:,)mmerll()r stah)(I lhalBART doh:rrninuti(ms must considerfilh;ruhle PMI.. PM_-.5 und c()n(h;rlsahh;

PM. The (:()mmenh;r shile(I Ihal Ih(;

PADEP BART (telerminations art.;

(,,xi)r(,'sst)(I in I(liul PM, hul Ih(; ct)sl

anal\,s(.IS w(;r(! (:()r+(lu(:h)d based (in

filh)ral)le PMI,. The (:()mmenh)r

rt;qu0'st(:d EPA to disapprovo i)ADEP's

(hlhlrminuliims un(I It(h Jill a l?l] ) lhulestiLl)lisht:s BART limits for filtcral)h)I'M,,..,. I'M2.5 und conderisabh; PMhl.(:ause I'ADEP set I3ART limits forfilh:ral)h: PM,• and fiiterabh; PM.

Response: EPA disagrees wilh Ihecommenh:r lhal lhe PM BART limilssh-uld he disal)l)rovv(I. The (:()nlr()ls (in

Ihe fat:ililies (:()nsi(lere(I I),,' PADEP forIhe emissi()rl limils irl Ihe BART(h)h;rminuli()rls ure effe(:live in re(hl(:ingfilterrd)h: and (:on(h;nsuhle parti(:ulutes.•(;purah: emissi()n limils for each art: nc)l

rl,(luir(:(l for BART.Comment: The commenler chfimed

1)ADEP's BART d(;h;rmirlaliorls undEPA's l)rt)l),)st:(l alIl)r()val {if lhesedeterminatiorls are fundamentallyflawe(I, arhih'ary, and unluwful. 'i'h(;c{)mmt)nhlr slalt;(] Ihul sour(:e-sp()cifi(:tlr()(:ess design informati(m is requiredIo make BART delorminalions whichPADEP (lid r'i()l l)r()vi(h). ()cie (:,mmmriler

shth)(I P,\DEP's flART (h;tt;rminulions

were furldamerllallv flawed for slopstrot, Ihl-t)ugh f()ur ()i' Ihe BAWl'(leterminali(Jrl [}ro(:ess. The (:ommenler

sluled the fluw in sit;l.) ()tle was IhatPADEP did nol ud(lress all a\,uihtl)lt;h,chn()l()gie.s for each BARTdelerminalion. The commt:nh;r stutedlh(: t'luw in ship lw(J wus lhal I'ADEP didn(ll Ul)l)r()priah)]y inh'rl)r(:l h)(:hni(:ul

feasibility (if (:ontr(d -i)tions inac('(.)rdilllC(; wilh the (.;uide]in(.'s f!)rIIA177' Delerminalinns ondl:r IhPriP,tonal lh'.ze Ruh •. ill Appendix Y It) 40CH( parl 51 (h(:rt;aflor the BART Ruh;).S•.'I• 7[) I"R 3(.)1 I)4 (luly 6, 2005). Thecc)mmonh;r slah;ct the flaw in sh:l'l lhret:was that PADEP did nol rank lho (:onirol(;ffectiv(;ness for all E(;II and m()s! n()n-

1,:(;[ I BAWl" de.lerminations. The(:()mineilh;r shih;(I the flaw in sh' I) fourwas lhai PADEP elimimttt;dhlchn()logies i)use.(l (in n(m-uir quulilytlnvironmenlul imtiu(:Is Ihal ure (:omm(m

Ihroughoui Ihe industry.lh.,sponse: C()ngrt)ss (':ra fle(I lh(; CAA

ttt |mtvidt• for stutes tt) tuk(: Ihe h;ml in(hlveh,[)ing iml)h;menhili[ul l)luris buthulunce(i thut (hlcision hy requiring El),'\

It) rt;\it;w lhe plans h)(ieh;rmille

whelher a SIP nl(.'ets Ihe retluirenlenls (If

the CAA. In uriderlaking such a review,EPA does n()l usurp i-i slalt)'s auih()rilv

Federal Register/Vol. 77. No. 135 / Friday, July 13, 2012 ! Rules and Regulations 41281

but onsures Ihat such authority isi't;as(mal}l\, uxert:ist:tl. BARTdt:lerminations undt;r the r,.;gicmal hazel•r()gram art; lilt; resl}onsilfilily (,1' Iheslah;s, which have lhe frt:t;{Iom Iodetermirle the weight and significant:(;of Ih•: slaluloPily rtrquii'ttd I]v(:-fltctt}rs init IIAII"I" determination. EPA lhunreviews a slale's delernlillalifql asilacludt;d in its rug)\trial hazt; plan.Pennsvlwtnia l)erfi)rmt:tl Ihv required[1AR'l"del(;rminations f(ir its BART-(,ligibh; suurct;s. In Aplmntlix J of its RHSIP submillal. Ih;nns\,lvania {:n,'isi{:leredthe required five-faclors and explainedits Gon(:]usit.Jn8 )(Jr each speci tic st)urce.

As idenlified in Appendix !.Pmmsvlvania. perfermed )Is BARTdolerminations ovaluatino the fivo-falll()l,'S rt:iluii'ed. Apl)(:ndi× l th:s(:ril)esthe steps I)()Pirls\,lvarlia look in(;valualing BAR;I" anti lir()vides a I)asisfor l)ennsvlvania's BARTd,)le.rmintili(ms hase(i (m lhose five-th(:tors. Tht; mr)de, ling of s()ul'(:,• im pat:Isanti lechni)h)gy reviuws for Sl)(,{:ifics()ur(:(: {:ah)g()ries can I)e Ibund inI)enns\,lwnlia's At)l)en(li(:es I, P and Qrt'sl)e('tivdy, which supi)ort1)t:nnsvl\'ania's BART dclermi,lalionsfi)und in Al)l)endix I. EI)A th:h,rmine.dthat PADEP did address all availablett;t:hrl{)h)gi(;s and at)l}rt)tu'iatt;lyd()i(:rminud tochnit:al feasibilily t)f Ih(Js{}technologies. The ranking nf {:t)ntr{)ltt.;chn()hig t:s is not it r(;quh'(.',nl(}lll of slt)plhr(:(: {,)valualing lh(: cclnh'olel'tbcliw;ness} in IIART (h;t(;rminations.The evalualion of non-air qualityimtiacls )is imrl ul'st()p f{iur of Ih(: FIART(h)ternfination should be math; based [in

a t:(insideration i)l' the slie(:ifit:cir{:Ulllslanl:t;s of thai st)urc(;, st) Iht;same le.l:hinl)l()gv may have a differentdegree (if impact t.lt;tJ(;nci{;lll on thesour{:\;. EI)A deturmined that I)ADEP didaddress sh: l) four fl)r lht; BARTdeterminations in accordance with theBART Ruh).

(]ommt:tll: The (:()mrrit)nh;r sial\it] IhlilIho PM limit for E(lt Is is invalid forBART. Penns\,lvania used an (mtdah;d0.1 p•mmi lml¯ million Ilrilish thermalunil (Ib/MMBIu} limil fi)r I]llernbh: PM.The proposed BART limil is muchhigher Ihan a{:Gt}pltld as IIART (or)isI}esl availabh, (:onh-()l h;{:hrlt)higy knownas BACT). and much higher than levels{:uria;nlly l)t:ing achieved al many ulh(;rsimilar fat:)lilies.

Itesponse: EPA disagrees that the I'MFIAR'P lira)Is are invalid. Whih! BACT issimihtr to I]ART, IIA(]T hits it l'()ur fact{•ranalysis {)1' envir()nmuntal iml)at:l.energy consumplion, (}coil(.)nlic impacl,anti (,qher costs. BART delerrilinalitinsh{iw,,J\'er involv(; a five fat:lot analysis (11"

all le{:hnologh)s available tbr relr()fil.{:, )nsitlP.ral i( ,n {)1' (-tiPren I {'.( )nl F( )l

l(){:hn,)lc)git:s, cosl t)f complian{:t• ofc()nlrols, remaining useful life t,f lh(:facility, t;nerq.v and non air-qualitycn\,ir()nnwnlal impacts, and \'is)It)lilyiml)a(:ls. IIART is n()l a rt)(luirt:d lop-down evaluali(in like FIAt71'. As slatedin Ihu BART Ruh.'. I11(.' sial\is sh()uhll'(.qaifl the (iist:reli()n It) evaltliit(; (:()r)tr()l( )lift( ins ifl whatever ( it'{i(;\" they {:hi 11 )se,

s() h)rtg as tht) slate, exl}lains its analysis[ll' Ihe CAA la(:hirs. PADI','P did addresseach ()f lh¢ five factors in its BARTth)lerminalion summaries in A1)tiendix J1,I" the I)ADEP D(:{:oi'i).ber 211, 20111 RHSIP submittal. Because DART antl BACTinwJlvt: dil'ferenl evaluations. E!)Abt:lit;\'t:s il is r{}asrmab](} h} hay()dit'lbr{;nl {)ul(:()rllt;S lill(I dil'ti.lrt)fll Iimilsfor (;ach review, 'l'ht; specific BACTlinlils {:ih;d lJV Ihn (ii}nllll(lllh}l" t:ilnnillaul()m:-ll it:ally I}(: t:unsi{h;r(;t] valitl flip

BART.()olzllTld)nl: FIAIIT guidelimJs prey)dr;

Ihal ma×inlunl availabh; {:()fHr()llet:hrlnJ{igy {MACT} for hazardous airpollutants {HAl)s) should b,.; taken intoa(:{:i)l_lnl fi)r deh;rmining BARrp its slatt)tlin 40 CI'R part 51, al)l)t;n(lix Y, St;c:ii()iaIV.(:. The commonter stalud that1)ennsvlvania EGI Is are sul)j(:(:l h) EPA'sMercury and stir 'l'()xics Standards{MATS Rule) which was pul}lished (in

l"ebruarv 1(6. 2012 {77 I"R !1304}. The{u,mmenh:r sllih.'ll Ihal EP:\ tnusl lukeIht}st) r{;quiromcnls inh) account inapl)ro\'ing any []ART d(;lurmil'lalioilI)t!(:ilUSl: all slliluha'v I,t(:lt)rs sh(mhl lit:im:lude.d. The (:(immenh-)r slale{] thaiPADEP's BART d¢,h}rnl inal hms for PMlimits i)1'11.1 II)/MMIIlu (:iifin()l bt:al)l)rtlve(l bet;ause Ih( )se Iinlils are l]lut:hhigher than the 1}.03 lb/MMBiu limit inthe final MATS Rule as it surnig.lu ]imilliir ilon-mer(:urv rnt)hll HiPs.

Response: EIiA agrt;tJs that wt; tierequire all slaluli)•, fachJrs l,i l)t;included in the t}•%R'I' {leterlninationsIhat are appli{:abh] al Ihe lime thedtJtorminalit.)ns art} done. EI)A {;illllltll

require BART detemlinati{ms It)l)I'(:tli(:tful Ul't} r!•.tluirttmtlnls anti hi im:l uth;Ihl}st} as BART. When EPA issu0s newrub;s. Iht; slalt)s nltlsl atlnl)l Iht;na asappropriate. The final MATS RuhJ wasliromulgalt;d at'tnr lilt; in'el}fiscal limihulapproval (if lht; PM I]ARTdnle.rminali•uls in lhe Pennsylvania RHSIP on lanuarv 26.2(}I 2.

Con)nTent: The t:t)mmt:nt(:r staled IhalEPA claimt;d it im:luded all BART-t;ligibh; sourct;s in lht: CSAPR Ilt;lh;r-lharl-llART analysis, bul lhe analysis[unittt:d it1{; BAlT,T-t;ligibh.; oil-firedE(;t•s as )(hint)fled L}\, PADEP. Thesefa{:iliti(;s in Ptmnsvlvania art, Trigen/Etlis,,ri Sial)tin \!ntis 3 anti 4: Trigen/Schuylkill 81ati()n Unil 26: Eddystta•t:tlnits :l and 4: and Marliris {]reek (In)is3 and 4. EPA's {:S.\PR Belh)r-lliarl-

BART analysis compart;d l}rt}iected E(;II(:missil)ns al Ihe im;sumpliw: E{',t II1A.RT limits t{J projected emissionsunth:r CSAPR. EPA Iht;n ml)delud theses(:t;narios agai nsl I hi: 2014 basel int.' I halt;x(:]udt.)s t}l)lh BART and C.,qAI)R. Th()visibililv lit:her)Is [i'lall Ihis nl{)(It;]hlgwere ih{;n av(.!rag(;d a{:i'l)ss all (]lass Iart)as. The c()mmunlt;r s[att;d Ihal EPAchiims this analysis shows that CSAI'Rwill r(:sull in rot)re ):missi•)ns rt:ttu{:li(msIhan BART and cih)s to 76 1"1,I 82225.'l'h•; c{)mmenler claimed thai CSAt)Rwill nol achieve oi't)alOl' rt}asoilal}]ei}rt)grt)ss tt}ward lhe nati()na] visibilitygoal than sour(:e-st.)ecific BART ftu"E{;I ls in I)ennsylvania. Even if(:SAPR{:ouhl hiwfullv sul}slilule f{)r BART. Ihe{:oinmenter cl2fimed Iht; instanlrulcmakh'•g would hay(; ttJ h]{:lu{h;separah) N(}x an(I S{}: BAWl'd(.;termi nal ions fl )r Pt.:nnsylvan ia E(;I fsbccaus{; CSAI)R does nnt in fa(.:l performI)ell,;r Ihan I]ART.

Rest}onse: These (:t}mments arebeyond the scope of this ruh;making.EI)A's response I{i comm()nls (:,)n(:erninglhe "CSAPR is Beller-lhan-BART"action can I.)e found in Dockel ID No.EPA-HQ-(}AR-2011-072{I alB.ww.rq•gu]olions.gov.

Con)nlonl: The commenter slated IhatPADEP (;valuah;d ship five (if Ihe BARTdeterminations in a piec(;mt;al fashi{m,cNnsiclt;ring tht; visibility iml)act to each(:lass I art;it st}paralt)ly anti (lclerllline(l(i()nlr{)ls I}ast!d (in Ih(l mtisl highlyhnl)ac'h:(l Class 1 areil. 1)ADEI)'s

al}prt)a(:h resu]led in sigPli Hcanilylln{h)rt)sllmaling visil)ililv

imlm )vt}mt;nts {:ore pared" 1•)

imp]()munling II-\RT fi)r I)A s()tll'(:(is.

M{}sl of tht; BAR'I'-(;Iigil)h.• sources iirt;

clusit;red in )hi.; s(a.llhwesl c{)rner {if lh(;sial0, nt}ar tl.)ur (]lass I areas, Mt)sl of lht;remaining BART-eligit)h.; sources artl(:lustered in ih(J s{lulh()lisl regioil {If lhestair;, near Brigantint; Class I area, withMol]h)iir irl th(; middlt; t}l' Iht} slah). Thefederal land managers [I"LMs} madesimilar c(annl(mls tin th(; draflPennsvlwn3ia RH SIP. PADEPr))sl)t)i•tlt)tl lhal Iht) BART Ruh! tilt\is rll)l

require a "cumulative" impact analysisand staltxl lhal EI)A has l)r()\'i{h:d n{)

gui(tam:( •, nil lhis isstl(;. The (:t)mm(;nhlr

disagreed aml slah;ll lhal lhe BART Ruleis (:lear Ihal nlullil)l(: sour(-:t;s iin{l (]lassI art)as ape to hll {:t)nsid(;red. The{3ilnmt)lll()p {:i1•.(1 I(i 7(} FR 391(51-(52.

The commontei? claimed EPAre{:omm•,.n{le.d lhal NebraskaDt}l}arlmt}lll of Envir(Jnmenlal {•ualily{NDEQJ {:onsi(h;r (:ah:ulalirlg thevisibility impr[)vemonl at multiph: {:lassI art;as.

Hesponst.v EPA disagrees wilh thisccunment in gonoral. The BART Ruh;pages rt;ferr•)(J I{) l}v lh(.; t:()ri]menler

41282 Federal Register/Vol. 77. No. 135 / Frictay, July 13, 2012 / Rule,s an(t Regulations

adclr(;ss ch;h,'rmining whelht;r a fat(lilyis BAR'r-eligibh; anti nol Ihe aplflicalih;approach defined later in the guidelinesfiw BART-subjec:l s(mrce,s. EPA agret)swilh PADEP that th() BART Rule (hw,snot require a "(:umu]alive'" impactanalysis as parl of the BART(lelerminati(m for a sp()�:ific source. Th(.'

guidelines dr) give, the el)lion to evalualecumulalive impacts to mulliple Class lm'(:as whi(:h EPA (h)e,s re(:()mm(;n(I bul(lees not requiro the state h) do. Asnot(',(l I)y the language used bv E])A h)

NDEQ. we recommend consi(leration ofthe (:umulative al)l)r()a(:h.

Comment: The commonlor stated thatIht.' PADILP soun:e-specif]c analyses, inApl)enttix I rejet:te(I e\,'er3, singh: c:()ntrol

opl it)n as not c:osl effeclive using one orboth ()f iht: following two measures:{hdlar per ton ()r (h)]lar per (le(:iview.

However, no significan('e thresholdswere osla|)lishod for (;,thor. The FLMsalso c()mmente(I ()n lhis issue (luring IhePADEP n:view pr()(:(-rss. PADEP'sres|)onse to the FLMs was that it did notestal)lish ,)r us,,' "l)right lint; Ihr()sh()hlsfi)r cost ,)r for visibility iml)r(we.me.nl inmaking BART determinations" inAI)pen(lix AA (ff the. l)ennsvlvania RHSIP submittal. Tht.' (:omment,;r n()t(:dthat base(l on (h;terminations in otherstates, the accephfl)h: cosl effoctivt;nessvaltm ranges I'r(ml $5.11(111 pt:r ton h)

$10.OO0 per ton. The com mentorclaimed that many of PADEP's "no(:(mtrol" d(,qerminali()ns fall well I)cl()w

lhis range.Response: EI)A's BART guidelines in

Ihe BART Rule (h) not requirePt:nnsvlvania to (teve, I,)p a specifi(:Ihn:sh()hl. I)ul ralher t() (:vaJuah)()a(:h

BART det(,,rmination on a cas(;-bv-(:ast)basis f()r ()a(:h s()ur(:e. EPA has notostablishe(l a specific cost threshoht thatmake.s a parli(:ular (:()ntr()] ()l)li()n BAR'I"based (m just a dollars p(;r t()n number.All fiv,: factors must be (:omparad toth.'t(;rmint.' the level of(:onlrol ,hal isBART on a (:ase-bv-case basis. Asdis,:usst)(I in Ihe. NPR, EPA fin(Is theBAR'F deh;rminations from ])ADEP

reasonahlP..Comment: The (:ommentcr stated that

EPA unr(:asonably reli(m on CSAPR fiw13ART and lh:d I,:PA faib..'d t() adequale.lyreview P(,'qnsylwmia's BAWl"determinations.

l{espon.•e: For BAR°l" deAerminations.f sources other than EG[ Is. EPAruvi(.,we(I PADEP's BART(h;tt,'rminati()ns in the D(:(:t)mber 2(1.

2010 l)(:rlnsvlvarda RH SIP submittalarl(I al)pr()ves the ,:()n(:lusi()ns as Ih(:determinations are reasonable.C,)mmt;nts r(;lah,qt t() CSAPR ;is )in

alh;rnalive to DART for E(;Us art:I)t:vond the scope of this ruh;making.EP-A a(hlresse(I similar (:()mmenls

concerning th(; "rransporl Rul,: as aBART alh)rnalivt; in a final at:lion Ihalwas signed on May 30, 2012 {77 FR"13642, lunt: 7.2(112}. 'rlao FPA'srt;spons() tt) tht;sc comments can t)t)

f{•un(l in Docket ID N(). EI)A-HQ-OAR-

2011-1172.q al www.t•.'guhHions.gov.(]omment: "rh,,' (:()mmt'nt(,'r slah;(I thai

EPA's prop,)sed SO2 redu(:tions froml)t;nns\,h, ania sour(:t:s as sul)sliluh:

measurt)s a(hlressing Pennsylvania's

lhilure Io a(hq)l the MitI-Atl'anti(;/Northeast Visibilih, t In|on (MANE-V111low sulfur fuel oil strategy art; largulyrelian! Ul)On the f)()rtlan(l Cent;ratingStati(m SO- re(tu(:tions from thefi'(lerally (:nf()r,;eabh: order fr()m EI)A

resp()ntling it) the (]AA s()ction 12iii)elition fronl the Slale, of New lersey.Tht; c:ommenh)r also stales thai Ihist)x'(ler has bt:en apl)eah)(l in the fe(leral

Court of Af)peals anti should not ber(fli(.',l tnp•,n du(; h) |Is un,:ertaintv.

l?est)onse: EI)A (lisagrees wilh'th÷:commt:nh:r. The rule issued in rcsp,mseh} lht: CAA s()(:li()n "126 p()lilion l'n)m lheSlat(: ,.)f New lersey for the Portlan(lGent:rating Station is fe(h:ralh,(;nf()rce,al)le and can be relied" upon[)e(:aus(; it has not I)()en stay()(I, nor hasil I)een rev()k()(I al Ihis time. Th(;

re(luctions can b(: relied upon forrt.'as(mal)h; progress at Ihis lime I)ec:aus(.'

it is a fe(lerally t;nfi)rct.'abh; measure. Ifth(;st; redu(:lions tl(.) fl()l OCCLIF, thenPADEP may have. Io address Ihem in lhe.fi \,(.' v,:ar h)()k I)a(:k I)y submitting a SIPrt:visi(m.

(',ommt:nl: Th(; (:()mm(:nler shlh,'d Ih;llPe,nnsvlvania's failure to a(l{)pt the, h)w-

sulfm"fut;l oil slrah'gv (hal was ]fl¢luded

in New ]e.rsey's reas()nal)h) prt)gressgt)al.,,4 (:alll]td hi-} SUl)ph,'nlenle(i t)v SOzemission re(Jut:,ions without mr;(]elillgIh(; impa('ts as r,:quin:tt I)y 40 CFR5 t.3Oa(d)(3}{iii}.

Response: EI)A disagrt:es with thec()mm()nter. 41) (:I"R 51.30a(d}(3}{iii)i)r(wides Ihal a sh(h,' "musl (h)(:um()nl

Ihe tt;chnical basis, including modeling.mr)nile)ring an(I emissions infi)rmalion,{)n which Iht) Slale is relying h)

(h;lermine |Is aiq)()rlitmmenl ()f

emission reduclion obligationsnet:essay, fi)r achieving reas,)nable

pr(.)gress in each mandatory Class lFe(h)ral area il affet:ls. Tht: Slalt) nlav

meet Ihis requirt.mat;nl by relying onh:c:hnit:al analyses dev(;Ioped 1)3' IheRPO and apI)rovt;d by all St;fit:

l)arlic:ipants. The ,•lah) musl ichmlifv Iht;I)aselint) emissi()ns invent(,rv on whlt:hits stralegies art; baso(I." 40 {]I"R51.3tlH(d){3}{iii}. EPA (lid i(h;nlifv Ihebaseline emissions for lhe measuressul)sliluh;d h)athlr()ss the SOzredutztions ,hal wou](t have come fr()ml)t,'nnsvh'ania's low-sulfur fuel oilslralegy, and the modeling imlm(:l (if the

MANE-VII rule was (tone bv Ih(;

regional planning organization {RPC)).The low-sulfur fuel oil strat0gy was anarea s()ur(:e rule and the sul)sliluh:(I(:missi()n reductions are from Sl)t:t:ifi(:sources thai are Iocal0d clos(;r Io theBrigantine Class I art)a. Thus. the.subslilulion of S()z rt)(luctions (h)(;s

meel Ihe n)(lulrem()nts in 411CFR51 .:tilt•,((I)(:l}{i ii }.

('omment: The (:ommenter slate.(I thatl)()th the EPA t)rt)post:d action forCSAI)R Ih;lh)r-than-IlART and EPA'spr(q)t)st.'(l at:tion on l)ennsylvania's RHSIP slated that EPA was taking action onIong-tm'm strategy in a separatu n()li(:e.

Th(; (:ommenh)r stated that nuithorruh:making acted un tht; h)ng-lurmstrah:gy for l)onnsyh'ania which isunlenabh; a(:(:or(ling h) the (:()mmenh',r.

Respons'e: The. (:()mm()nler has madeall ixl(-(_)rrecl assumption. The EPAshded in Ihe prop()se(] action for (]S/\]IR

Bet It:r=l han-B ART I hat we pr()l)( )sed a]imile(I (lisappr()val of the rt)gional hazeSIPs that have been submitted bvst:vt:rul states including l)ennsvlvaniaand that these states "fully (:onsistenl

wilh the E1)A's rogulali(als al Ihe time,relie(t (m CAIR requireme, nls h) satist•'tht) I|ART requirement and thert:(luirem(;nl fi)r a hmg-h,,rm slrah)gysufficient to achieve, the state-ach)ptt;(lr,:as(,nal)le, progress g()als" (7(* FR82221}. We, furlher slale(I Ihal "'(-:AIR

and CAIR IqP requirements, however.will (,nlv remain in f()r(:e to address,:missions through Ihe 2011 controlp()ri()(I and Ihus (:AIR (:annol I)e reliedupon in a SIP as a sul)stilute for BART()r as parl ()f a lor•g-term (:,)ntrol

slralegy." hi. EPA prol)oSt)d andfinalized a limited disapl)r()\'al fi)r IheP(•.nnsvlwmia RH SIP fi)r the h)ng-termslrategy due to relian(:e on CAIR. The()lh,;]- long-term strategy measures art:cov,;r(;d under the limited approval[)r,)[)()se(l fi)r l)onnsylwmia's RH SIP hl77 FR 3!)88. Tht;r(.q'•)re. all long-termc:onhx)l slrategi()s beyond reliance r)n

(;AIR are inclu(h;(l in tht; limitt:dapproval previously proposed, and nowfinalize(I, by this lie:lion. The finallimih;(I disal)l)roval and FI! ) waspublished on lane 7.2012. addressinglhe (tefi(:it:n(:ies •)1" Ihe Iong-h.'rm slralegyinsofar as il relied on CAIR (77 FR33642 }.

Comment: "I'ht,, c:ommt.)nle.r re(tuesteda (:t)n(lilional al)prowt] ()fP(mnsvlvanla's RH SiP requiring lht,,

imph)[nenhtlion of Iho h)wor-sulfur fut:]

stralegy sin(:e it was relied upon for(;stablishing the reasonabh) progressg()als fi)r MANE-V( I Class I areas.Multiple ('omm(:nlers also statt;d thatEPA's subslilution of (:missionre.(lu(:li()ns is n()t permilled under Ihe

Federal Register/Vol. 77. No. 135 / Fri(lay, July 13, 2012 / Rules ancl Regulations 41283

Regional Haze Rule for reasr)nal)lutm)gress goals for visihil itv.

lh:stumso: ErA does noi aorc:e that acunditi(mal appr{,val is appropriate forIhe Pennsvlwmia RH SIP giver) ourdt;turmimition that the plan meets thurehwanl alq)licahh: rt:quiremenls. As sulthrlh in a prior resl)(mse, EPA disagreesthat suhstitutiorl of emissi(m redut:tionsis not tu'rmitted f,.w ruasonl,bh: prugressg(mls.

Comment: Tho commt:nie.r slaled thatEPA sht,uM have clisapprovr;dPennsvlwmia's RH SIP due t•) PADEP'sfailurti t- implemunt a propused luw-sulfur fuel oil strategy. The' COllllllenterslated thai ISPA sh,)uhl hay,, d,mandetltht; additicmal 5,702 tons of S(.)_-emission r(;ductio,]s frolll l)e.nnsvlvaniainstea(] ()1' saying that EPA dues ]lt,tanticipate lht: difference will inh;rl'ure

with lilt ability .f oll'.,r slah.s hJ a{:hiev(:rcas,:)nal•h; prugress goals.

lh•sf•onm.: E[)A disagrt:es with thec()mrllerlh.;r. Disaplm)ving lht; enlir(}Pennsylvania RH SIP would havesl()wetl implementation nf nlhe.rcontrols listed in the RH SIP. Asexplained in thv NPI{, wu anti(:ipal(• IhalIll{: Pennsylvania RH SIP will ensuresu fl]cienl emission re(lu(:l i(nlS h) meetits share nee{h:d l:nr nearby states toachieve thuir reasonable pr< gress goals.If it is th:lt:rminud Ihal Ihu shurlfaI1 (d'St.)_, t;missi( m rt:{luctitms impe(les Ih(:at:hit;\'emt;n[ uf rt;asonal)h) pr(Jgress,then at the time of the five vt;ar perindi{:ru\,it:w PADEP ma\, nt:ed I,• suhmil a SIPrevision rt:quiring'tht)st: additi,,nalrod ucl ions,

Commenl: ()ne COITIIT'I(HIIt;r slated thaiIhe PADEP BART delerminalion for(h;n()n Energy's (:heswick (a:nt;ralingStation in{:ludml emissi.n limitsinuluding I'M which were in{x.,nsislenl

with the 1;lant's currt;nt permits. TheCOlllillQ,nh'Ir requested EI)A Ic) rr)qtfir(:PADEP it) re\'is(; the DARTd(:t arm i nat ion.

Fh.,sponse: EI)A t;valuah:tl Ihe BARTd{:l{;rminatit)n and agl'ees with I)ADEI)'s(h:10rmination (,f Ihe appropriale BARTlimit hast:d nn (:urrt.mi (:t)ntr.ls. InselliJlg Ihe BART limils. PADEP a|)|)t;arsIt) have sel emissitm limils f()r IheI.l(:ilil3, thai art' fitr m()rt; stn'ingcnl Iharlintt:ndud. If Pt:rmsvlvarfia submils arevised BAWl' th:tt..•rmirmlion for theCht;swit:k ( h;nt;ral ing ,Still i( )11, EI)A{:(mainits to act (:xpt;ditiously on ther(:vist:d SIP submilla].

Comment: 'I'w• (:ommcnters statedthai I'ADEI ) clid 11ol address reas{maL)lcprogress requiremmals fi)r addressingMANE-Vt.I's modeled exct;o(tanc:e t)f Iheuni h)rm rah 3 uf pl'i)grt:ss (t !RP) al Dolly

Sods Class 1 area.lh•sl)ons(,: Rt:asonablt: pl'c)gress g(.)als

are set hv Iht.: Class I area sial(:. W(:sl

Virginia dM nlt)l rt:qu(:st any ra(luctionsfi',-)m P0nns\.lvalfia Io mr:el lhe [ IRI ) asmodeled by Visibility Improvemen!State and Trihal Association of theS.utheas! (VISTAS). The discretian(:i(:sin m,..)deling belwet;n th0 two R1)Os wereaddresst:d in I)t;nnsvlwmia's RH SIPsubmillal. "['he requiremenl fur Ihe slate(:(msullalit)n I)r()(:ess was reel. antil)tmns\,lvarlia fulfilled whal wasrt;quesletl I)v Wt:sl Virginia.

()onm)onl: Tht; C.t-)llllll(?lller staled IJlalPennsvlvania's modeling for the RH SIPsuhmi}tal ditl not a(Mr{:ss the sigriificantgrowlh in emissi..ns from Marcellus,Shale natural gas drilling rqmratiuns aridtherelore ch)es llt)l supl)t)rl reas()nahh;

[)rt)gress.

lh,sl)ons(,: EI)A disagrees wilh thet;,t)infll(lfl|er be(:ause rt,'asenable progrt;ssgoals art; set hv the (:lass I area arm areevaluated during lht) 5 y):ar [)eri()dicreview. In addition, CAA st)(:li(.)ll

16(.)A(g)(1 ) requires slates h) take int()ct)nsitleralic)n a numL)er t)f ['•it:t()l'S forrt)as( )flahla; l')l'l )gress. Sl:.th)s hay\:fh;xil)ililv in htJw h)lake int()

t:( msideralit)n Ih(:se sial tnh )r\, fm:h Jrs andan\' otht;r I'aclurs Iha! are (h',lermincd h)

hc rch;vanl. As provhmsly t:xplah'it:dherehl and in lht; NPR. we iinlit:ipaleIhal ihc l)urinsx'lvallhi Rlrl SIP willensurt: sufficienl emission reductionsfor reas{mabh; progress goals. During thefive \,ear perintlic review, any

significant t:hanges in Ira)jut:tedemissinris c:an hi; addressed.

IV. Final Action

El':\ is finalizing its limited apprt)valnf lht; ruvision to tht: l)erinsvlvania SIPsuhmittt,d ()n De{:embe,r 20, 2011) thataddresses rugit)nal haze l'()r the firstiml)hmu:ntalinn period in Pt;nnsvlvania.EPA iN issuing a limiled alqm)val of Ih(;l)ermsvlvania SIP because t)v(:rall theSIT) will lit) sll'iingtw ancl mi,rt: lir(ile.)t:livet)l" Ihe envir(Jnlnenl wilh Iheiml)h:intwllallr)n t)l' Ihi)st: ml:asures hvlieimsy.'l\'allia anti hetlausc Ihe SIP willI)e strong()r will'l federal alil)r{)vril arident'(irceubilitv of Pt;nns\'lvania's RH SIPIll:an it weuld without (hose measuresbeing includt;d in the 1 enrlsvlvania SIP.EFA has alrea(lv finalized lhe limileddisal)l)ri)val tit Pennsylvania's RH SIP irla Stil)iirale ruleMakillg (77 I"R ',131142.

lure: 7. 21112). Ell:\ is als.) apl)l't)ving thisrevision as mceling Ihe alHdi(:abh;visiliiliiv related r(;quirements (.)f(IAAse(:ti+)n 110{a)(2} in(:lutling but l'l()l

limii(;(l Io. secihm 110(a)(2)([J)(i}(ll} and(a)(2)(l}. relating I(1 visihilily lir()h:clitillfi>r th(: I tit.t7 8-hc, ur [ It) z ,it, i] , } NAAQS alldlhe 19(.)7 and 20Oil I)M_... NAAQS.

V. Statutory and Executive OrderReviews

A. ( ;onerul Rt.xltHtr:monlst Inder th{; CAA. th(; Adminish'atur is

required I() al)lm)Ve a SIP suhmissitmIhat c-ml)lius with the Im)visic)ns of IhuCAA and at)plic:ahh: I;t;(i(;l')ll regulali()ns.42 tI.S.(:. 7410(k): 40 {:FR 52.02(a).Thus. in rt,viewing Sll ) suhmissions.EI)A's rc)le is to al)lm)ve slat{; {:h,)it:es,lir()vided Ihal the\, met)l IIlt: crihn'ia t)l"lht; CAA. Accordingly thin actionmert)lv al)l)rov()s sial(; hiw as rm)etingl"ederill requirements aml does n()l

impt)se addititmal requirements he\,ondlhust; imposed by shllt+' law, l".r lhalreasoll, this action:

¯ Is n(fl a "'significanl regulatoryac:tit)n" sulljec:l it) rt;view bv Ih•.; Ot'fic:(;()t' Marmgem{ml and I'ludg(:t urM{,r

Exm:ulive Ordur 1286(; (58 FR 517:15,()(:l()[)(;i" 4, 19.q3);

¯ Dues rlol impose un inti)rmalionctdh:(:ti(,'l burdtm un(h:r the l)rt)visitms()t' lhe Paperwork Reduclior) A(:l (44[ I.S.(:. :1501 •';l st;+/.}:

¯ Is ct;rtificd as nol having asignificant ect)nomic: iml)acl •)n asuhstantial number of small entiliesunth•r lhe Reguhlh)ry Fh,xihililv A(:I(5 it.S.C. ()01 ,Pl st.%l.);

¯ Dt)t:s nc)l (:t)nlain +in\' unfun(ledxn;-tndale or sight ficantlv t•r uniquelyaff(:(:l small g•)vernm(:nts, as deSt:T'ihedin Ihe I. Infunde(] Mandatt;s Rc)form Actt)f lt)t)5 [Puh. L. 104-4):

¯ D()[.)S nt)[ havt; I,'ed(,ralismiml)li(:atitms as Sl)ec:ified in Exe(:utiveOr(tar 13132 (64 H( 43255. August 10,19(.:)(`1};

¯ Is I1()1 an t:ctmt)mit:ally slgnificaillr{;guhllorv action based ()iI ht;alth orsafely risks suhject tt) Executiv,.: (.)rder

13045 (02 FR 1(`)885. AI)ril 2:1, 1(,1(`)7);¯ Is nol a signific:anl r(;guhit()ry a(:tion

sul)i(;cl to) Exe(:ulive Orth;r 1:1211 (66 1¢1(I

28355. May 22, 2001}:¯ Is nt)i subject to requirt'mt.:nls of

Su(:lit)n 12(d) c)f Iho Naliunal'l'+:c:hn,)lt)gy Transfer antl Advan(:ementAcl of 1 (,)(,)5 [1 5 [ I.N.(:. 272 nOl()) I)ec;ftust,)

applit:ali()n t,f lht)se re(luiremenls wt)uhlhe inconsislenl with IIm (:AA; anti

¯ Does not l)rnvith: EPA with thedis(:rt:lionarv autht)ril\, In atldross, asapprt)priat(.), tlisl)rt)[){)rtit,nale humanhealth or environmental effects, usingi)racl icahh: anti legally [term issibh:melho(|s, und0r Executive Order 1217,(.)8

[5!) H.I 7629, Fe[)ruarv 16.1(.)(.)4}.In atldili{)n. Ihis ruh: dc)c:s not have

h'iiml imt)]it:atitms as sl)t:(:il'it:{l h\'Executive Order 13175 (fi5 t"R 67249.Nt)vt:rnber .ti, 201}I)), i){)(:ause the SIP isn(}l al)l)r()vt!tl I()al)[)ly irl hltliarl {:t)untrvh)cated in Ihe slale, arM EI)A tloh;s lhalil will nt)l imp.)st: suhshtnlial (lirt:cl

41284 Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 135 / Friday, July 13, 2012 / Rules and Regulations

Cosls on trihal govnrnm0111s or proem[)lIril)al law.

B, Submission to Congress anti theColnph'olh.'r ( ;eneral

The Congressional Review Acl, 5l I.&C. 801 et seq., as a(hled by the SmallBusim'ss Regulah wy En fi wta:menlFairness Act of lg96. generally l)rnvidesthat befiwe a ruh: ma\, take effect, theagen(:y promulgaling the rub,' muslsubmit a rule reporl, which includes acopy of the rule. to each House of theCongress and to the, Comptroller (.em;ral

of the I hlih.nt Slales. EPA will sul)mil ureport ccmlaining this aclioq and otherrequired information to Ih(: i!.S. St:nate.thu [ !.S. Houst,' of Rt;presenhflives, andthe C.mplrolh,'r (;encra] of Iht: l InitedStates prior I.)pui)licalion oflhe rule inIhe, Federal Register. A major rule,t:ann•fl lake effe(:t until 60 davs after itis published in the, Federal Register.This acli(m is not a "major ruh;" asdefined by 5 t I.S.C. 804(2).

C. Petitions .for Judicial Review

t Inder section 307(b){1 ) of the CAA.lmtilions fiw iudi(:ial review of thisaction inugt be, l]led in the [ Inih:d Slates[:ourt in' Al)peals for the appr(q)rialecircuit I)3, September 11. 2012. Filing apetition for reconsideration I)\' lheAdminislrahw of this final ruie does notaffect the finality of this action fiw Ihepurl)t,ses ,)f iudi'c:ial review nor does itextend the time within which a petiliorlfor judi(:ia] review may I)u t1 h,'d, antishall not [)t}stponP, the effectivu'ne.ss (}f

su(:h rule f)r action. This aclinnfinalizing the limited appr(wal of theI'ennsvlvania Regic.)nal Haze SIP may

not be challenged lah;r in lm.:eedings tomlff)rc:e its requirements. See section31)7(b1{2) of Ihe CAA.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmmilal i)r(declion, Airpollulion (:(mtrol, lnt:orl)-ndi,m bvr(ff'eren(:e. Nilrogen dioxide, l•articulaht

nlalle,r, ROl)orling and rec:ordk0epingre,(luiremenls. Sulfur oxides, V()latile

organic compoun(ls.Dale(l: June tS, 2012.

W.C. Early.Acting lh'gi.nel Administrator. Rvgi.n IlL

40 (:I'R part 52 is amended as fidlows:

PART 52•AMENDED]

¯ 1. The authorilv (:itation f()r i)art 52(:(retinues to react as follows:

Authority: 42 LI.S.C. 7401 et se.q.

Subpart NN• Pennsylvania

¯ 2. In § 52.2520, the lahle in paragraph{e} is amt,nded I)y a(hling an entry forRegi(uml Haze. Plan at the e.nd ,:,t"lhetal)h,' h, read as folh)ws:

§ 52.2020 Idenliflcation of plan,

{(,..}',.', * *

Name of non-regulatory SiPrevision Applicable geographic area

Statesubmittal EPA approval date Additional explanation

date

Regional Haze Plan ................. Statewide ................................ 12/20/10 7/13/12 [ Insert page number §52.2042; Limited Ap-where the document begins], proval.

IFR Dot', 2012-1642|1 Filed 7-12-12:11:45 •i]JJ]

BILUNG CODE ll•liO-•-P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0398; FRL-9352-2]

Azoxystrobin; Pesticide Tolerances

AGENCY: Environmental Pr()lu(:lion

.,\gen(:y (El'-\}.

ACTION: Final ruh;.

SUMMARY: This r(,'gulali(,n eslal)lisho.stolerances for residues of azoxvslml)inin or on multiple commodities whichare identified anti discussed lah:r in Ihisti()(:ummH, lnh,'rregi()nal ResearchPr()je(:l Number 4 {IR---4) and Syngenta(Crop Prcflectinn requested theseIole, ranct,'s un(ler the Fecleral Food.Drug, and Cosmetic Act {FFDCA).DATES: This n,'gulat ion is effecliw •, July13, 2012. (}l}je(:li(,ns and r(,(lU(:Sls f()r

hearings must I)e re(:eive(I ()n or I)t:t'()rt;

Septeml)er 11,2012, and must l)e fih;din at:(:t)rtiant:d wilh lilt; instrut:lionsprovided i,} 40 CFR part 171', (s0e alsol Inil I.(:. of the SUPPLEMENTARYINFORMATION}.

ADDRESSES: '['ht; (h)t:kt;I for Ihis atilt)n.identified I)y (lo(:kel i(lentith:ation (ID)n U ml)er I,'.I)A-H q-( )PP-2011 -t)3gB:

FRL-(,I352-2, is availal)h; oithereh:clr(,ni(:ally Ihr()ugh htlp://www.rqtadulions.gov t)r in hard copy althe ()l't' Docket in the EnvironmentalProteelion Agency, Docket Center (EPA/DC). located in EI'A West, Rm. 3:1:14,1301 (2onstituti-n Av,,.. NW..Washington. DC 204litl-0t)01. ThePuhlic: Reading Room is open fi-om8:30 a.m. h)4:30 p.m.. M(mday thr(mghI,'rldav. ex(:luding h;gal h()lidavs. Theh,'leph(me numl)er for lhe Pul}li(:

Reading Roum is {202} 5t16-1744. afldII'a; I(!h:l)h()ne nunll)(;r for Ihe ()PP

Dockt:l is (703) 305-5805. I)]ease r(,'\'iew

the visitor instructions and additionalin format ion a[)ou [ the do(:kel availahleal hltl•://www.opct.•ov/dot'kots.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:An(trew Erlman. Registration Division,{75051 )) ()M(:e ()f Pc,slit:tale l)]'t)grams,gnvir(mmenhtl Pr()le(:lit}n Agent:y. 1200Pmlnsvlvania -\ve. NW., VVashingh)fl,DC 21]41i04)111)1: h:h,'phone numl)er:

(703) 30B-.q3(17: umail achiress:qwlmun.undrr•w@elm.gt) v.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action opl)]y to me?

Y(,u may. be I)oh;ntially afft:ch;d I)ythis action if you are an agriculturalt)rc)(lu(:er, l'o(ul manufuc:turer. ()r

|)(;sti(:i(|{,• manu|a(:turer. Potentially

affected enlilies may include, but arem)l limih:(I h, Ihl,se engaged in Ihefollowing activities:

¯ Cr(. 1) l)rc)duc:lion (NAI(]S (:,)(le 1111.¯ Anirnal i)r()(lu(:li{m CNAICS (:ode

112).¯ Fond manufacturing {NAICS code

311).¯ l)esticide manufacturing (NAICS

(:(ule :}25321.This listing is not inten(led to I)e

exhausli\'t;, bul rather to l)rovi(h; a guidef,,r readers regarding entities likelv In l)e

affected l)y Ihis action, f)lher tyl)eS {ffel)lilies not listed in this unit (:(•uhl alsobe aft'coted. Thv. North Amm'it:anImluslrial Ch,ssifi(:ali(m S\,sh.'m(NAICS} (.:odes have been im)vi(led toassist \'()u and •)lhers in (.h.qerminingwhelh'e,r Ihis at:ti()rl might apply hic:ertain entities. If v,)u have an\,

quesli()ns regal'dhlg Ihe apl)lit:;,bilily ()f

this acti(m In a particuhir e.ntily, consultIho pe, rson lish,,d unde,r FOR FURTHERINFORMATION CONTACT.