© UNCT, Swaziland UNDAF: 2011-2015 - Home page | UNICEF · 2015-06-02 · 4 © UNCT, Swaziland UNDAF: 2011-2015 We, the United Nations Country Team in Swaziland, while respecting

1

© UNCT, Swaziland UNDAF: 2011-2015

The United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF) 2011-2015The Kingdom of Swaziland

This UNDAF document is an official publication of the United Nations System in Swaziland, and all rights are reserved. The document may be freely quoted or translated, in part or in full, provided this source is acknowledged.

For further information please contactOffice of the UN Resident CoordinatorLilunga House, Somhlolo StreetP. O. Box 261, Mbabane, SwazilandTelephone +268 404 2301Email: [email protected]

2


The United Nations has been present in the Kingdom of Swaziland since independence in 1968. Since then, the UN has played a key role in providing Government with policy and technical advice as well as practical support to help us achieve our development objectives: economic growth, poverty reduction and the wellbeing of every citizen. UNDAF has been the framework, giving strategic and programme context to our partnership. The preparation of the present UNDAF-2011-2015 was participatory and inclusive.

In preparing this UNDAF, the Government and the UN system have worked together to define the ways and specific areas in which the UN system is best placed and equipped to contribute to our development objectives and measure progress. In this respect, the Millennium Development Goals provide the critical benchmark. The four UNDAF pillars of HIV and AIDS; Poverty and Sustainable Livelihoods; HumanDevelopment and Basic Social Services; and Governance provide a framework for thissupport. I am glad to note the UN is defining its role in helping Government fulfill its development objectives and that the UNDAF is wholly aligned with the National Development Strategy (NDS) and Poverty Reduction Strategy and Action Plan (PRSAP). This provides a strong basis for strengthening the long and stronger partnership between the Government and the UN system.

The Government will contribute fully to the implementation of this UNDAF and the achievement of its objectives.

HRH Prince HlangusemphiMinister for Economic Planning and Development

Government of the Kingdom of Swaziland

Foreword

3


The Government of the Kingdom of Swaziland, through its National Development Strategy (NDS) and the Poverty Reduction Strategy and Action Programme

(PRSAP), has articulated its vision and programme for achieving the Millennium Development Goals. The elaboration of this United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF) covering the 2011-2015 period was informed and guided by the broader national priorities as articulated in that vision and programmes of Swaziland.

This UNDAF is the vehicle for strategic partnership and resource planning which will drive the programmes under which the UN System will support Swaziland in the realization of its development goals. This UNDAF is fully aligned with national priorities and the PRSAP, the NDS and the Government’s Ten Point Action Programme-2009-2015.

The process of preparing this UNDAF 2011-2015 was participatory and inclusive. It involved extended consultations other stakeholders undertaken under the overall guidance of the UNDAF Joint Steering Committee co-chaired by the Government and the UN. The UNDAF is also the result of the consensus reached by the United Nations Country Team and validated by key stakeholders.

As we embark on the implementation of this UNDAF, the UN system will strive to forge greater internal coherence and enhance its efficiency and effectiveness and work towards “Delivering as One” as part of its comprehensive strategy for increasing development impact in support of the effort of the Kingdom of Swaziland towards achieving the MDGs

We will ensure that the United Nations’ collective human, technical and financial resources are marshalled and deployed in the most effective and efficient manner to maximize our value as a partner in achieving measurable results. In addition, the UN Country Team is fully committed to strengthened partnerships and increased cooperation as it works in support of the development objectives of the country.

NFP

Preface

4


We, the United Nations Country Team in Swaziland, while respecting agency mandates and comparative advantages, pledge our commitment to joint programming to foster harmonizationand coordination among all agencies.

Jama GulaidUNICEF Representative

Aisha Camara-DrammehUNFPA Representative

Neil BoyerUNDP Deputy Resident Representative

Owen KaluwaWHO Representative

Karla HersheyWFP Representative

Maria ZimmermannFAO Representative

Alaphia WrightUNESCO Representative

Sophia Mukasa-MonicoUNAIDS Country Coordinator

HRH Prince HlangusemphiGovernment of the Kingdom of Swaziland

Mr. Musinga T. BandoraUnited Nations Resident Coordinator

Elisabeth Bayer Acting UNODC Representative

Vic Van VuurenILO Representative

5


Foreword ......................................................................................................................................................... 2Preface ............................................................................................................................................................. 3Commitment Page ........................................................................................................................................... 4Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................................ 7Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 9

1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 11

1.1 COUNTRY BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 111.2 EXISTING CHALLENGES ..................................................................................................................... 11

1.2.1 The HIV and AIDS Challenge .................................................................................................... 111.2.2 High Poverty Levels ................................................................................................................... 111.2.3 Sluggish Economic Growth ........................................................................................................ 121.2.4 Weak Human Development and Fragile Basic Services Delivery .............................................. 121.2.5 Governance ................................................................................................................................ 121.2.6 Food Security and Nutrition Challenges ..................................................................................... 121.2.7 Gender Equality .......................................................................................................................... 131.2.8 Environmental Conditions that are not Sustainable .................................................................... 13

1.3 GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORKS ........................................................................... 141.4 UNDAF PREPARATION APPROACH ................................................................................................... 161.5 UN COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE ....................................................................................................... 181.6 STRATEGIC ISSUES UNDERPINNING THE UNDAF ........................................................................ 181.7 LESSONS LEARNT FROM UNDAF 2006-2010 ................................................................................... 19

2. UNDAF Results ......................................................................................................................................... 21

2.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 212.2 UNDAF PILLAR 1: HIV AND AIDS ...................................................................................................... 22

2.2.1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 222.2.2 Role of the UN ........................................................................................................................... 22

2.3 UNDAF PILLAR 2: POVERTY AND SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS ............................................. 232.3.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 23

2.3.2 Role of the UN ........................................................................................................................... 242.4 UNDAF PILLAR 3: HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND BASIC SOCIAL SERVICES .......................... 25

2.4.1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 252.4.2 Role of the UN ........................................................................................................................... 26

2.5 UNDAF PILLAR 4: GOVERNANCE ..................................................................................................... 262.5.1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 262.5.2 Role of the UN ........................................................................................................................... 27

2.6 CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES ..................................................................................................................... 27

3. UNDAF Resources .................................................................................................................................... 28

3.1 RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................................. 283.2 RESOURCE MOBILIZATION ................................................................................................................ 29

4. UNDAF Management and Implementation ........................................................................................... 30

4.1 OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................................. 304.2 UNDAF MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS ..................................................................................... 30

Table of Contents

6


4.2.1 United Nations Country Team (UNCT) ...................................................................................... 304.2.2 Joint Programme Management and Coordination Team (JPMCT) ............................................ 314.2.3 Thematic Working Groups (TWGs) ........................................................................................... 324.2.4 Monitoring and Evaluation Committee (MEC) .......................................................................... 32

5. Monitoring and Evaluation ...................................................................................................................... 33

5.1 PRINCIPLES ............................................................................................................................................ 335.2 INDICATORS FOR UNDAF MONITORING ......................................................................................... 335.3 UNDAF EVALUATION ........................................................................................................................... 33

Annexes .......................................................................................................................................................... 341. UNDAF Results Matrix .............................................................................................................................. 342. UNDAF Monitoring and Evaluation Framework ....................................................................................... 463. Monitoring and Evaluation Calendar .......................................................................................................... 67

7


AIDS Acquired Immuno-deficiency SyndromeART Antiretroviral Therapy AWP Annual Work planCANGO Coordinating Assembly of NGOsCBCS Community Based Care Services CBO Community Based OrganizationCCA Complementary Country AssessmentCEDAW Convention for the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against WomenCPAP Country Programme Action PlanCSENs Children with Special Educational Needs CSO Civil Society OrganisationDaO Delivering as OneDOTS Directly Observed Treatment, Short-courseERC Economic Recovery Commission Report FAO Food and Agriculture OrganizationFDI Foreign Direct InvestmentGBV Gender Based Violence GDP Gross Domestic ProductHAART Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy HACT Harmonized Approach to Cash TransfersHDI Human Development IndexHIV Human Immuno-deficiency VirusHMIS Health Management Information Systems HTC HIV Testing and Counselling ILO International Labour OrganisationJAPR Joint Annual Programme ReviewJPMCT Joint Programmes Management and Coordination TeamJMT JUTA Management TeamJUNPS Joint UN Programme of SupportJUTA Joint United Nations Team on HIV and AIDSM&E Monitoring and EvaluationMDGs Millennium Development GoalsMEPD Ministry of Economic Planning and DevelopmentMTR Medium Term Review NASA National AIDS Spending Assessment NDP National Development PlanNDS National Development StrategyNERCHA National Emergency Response Committee on HIV and AIDSNGOs Non-Governmental OrganizationsNSP National Strategic PlanPEPFAR President’s Emergency Plan for HIV/AIDS Relief PLWHA People Living With HIV and AIDS PRSAP Poverty Reduction Strategic and Action Plan PSG Policy Support GroupQSA Quality Support AssuranceRC Resident CoordinatorSDHS Swaziland Demographic and Health Survey SHIES Swaziland Household Income and Expenditure Survey

Acronyms

8


SPAFA Swaziland Partnership Forum on HIV and AIDSSPEED Smart Programme on Economic Empowerment and Development STIs Sexually Transmitted InfectionsSNL Swazi Nation Land STWG Senior Technical Working GroupTDL Title Deed Land TWGs Thematic Working Groups UMEC Monitoring and Evaluation CommitteeUNDAF United Nations Development Assistance Framework UN United NationsUNAIDS Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDSUNCT United Nations Country TeamUNDAF United Nations Development Assistance FrameworkUNDG United Nations Development GroupUNDP United Nations Development ProgrammeUNESCO United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural OrganizationUNFPA United Nations Population FundUNGASS United Nations General Assembly Special Session on HIV and AIDSUNICEF United Nations Children’s FundUNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and CrimeUNTG United Nations Theme GroupVAC Vulnerability Assessment CommitteeWFP World Food ProgrammeWHO World Health Organization

9


Swaziland is a landlocked country with a population of approximately one million people, about 70 percent of whom live in rural areas. As part of the preparation of this UNDAF, several important manifestations of the country’s socio-economic condition were identified. They include the following:

(a) High HIV and AIDS prevalence has contributed to the continued breakdown in social service delivery; reduction in household incomes; and a less than optimal national economic growth rate.

(b) High poverty levels remain, in spite of the country having a relatively high GDP per capital income of US$2,415. About 69 per cent of the country’s 1.018 million people live below the national poverty line, and income distribution is highly skewed. Swaziland’s target under the MDGs is to reduce income inequality.

(c) Sluggish economic growth, due to country’s declining GDP growth rate in the last two decades, has been worsened by recurrent droughts, reduced export receipts, volatile exchange rates,

and the erosion of trade preferences. Sluggish economic growth has translated into significant adverse effects on social sector expenditures and has contributed to worsening poverty levels.(d) Weak human development and fragile basic social services are exemplified by significant

wealth redistribution challenges; decelerating population; weak education and training structures; a frail health system; and weak human resource capacity for the provision of quality basic social services. The country also faces significant challenges with increased burden of communicable, non-communicable and epidemic diseases. (e) On the issue of governance, the Constitution passed in 2005 provides for fundamental rights

and freedoms as well as greater decentralization in the provision of services. Other issues relate to human rights; the protection of social, cultural and economic rights; transparency and accountability in public sector management; strengthening justice delivery systems; and fast tracking the domestication of international and regional conventions and treaties. There is

still need to capacitate the newly established institutions, such as the Human Rights and Public Administration Commission.(f) Food security and nutrition challenges largely stem from successive years of drought caused by

climate change; multi-dimensional impacts of HIV and AIDS; dependence on production under rain-fed conditions; and declining use of improved agricultural technology.

(g) Gender inequality, with women being worse off in terms of poverty prevalence. Women’s access to productive assets, including land, continues to perpetuate the problem of gender inequality.

(h) Environmental conditions that are non-sustainable, with climate change posing adverse impacts on human health, food security, economic activity and physical infrastructure.

Based on the findings catalogued above, the UNDAF preparatory process ensured that some of these challenges are captured in its core programme of activities over the period 2011-2015. Guided by Swaziland’s policies and priorities and utilizing a consultative process at different levels both within the UN System and between the UN and its strategic partners, and under the overall leadership of the Joint Steering Committee (co-chaired by the Government and the UN), the UNDAF preparation was clearly inclusive. The following are the four UNDAF Pillars and the associated UNDAF Outcomes duringits 2011-2015 lifespan:

Executive Summary

10


UNDAF Pillar UNDAF Outcomes1. HIV and AIDS To contribute to reduced new HIV infections and

improved quality of life of persons infected and affected by HIV by 20152. Poverty and Sustainable Livelihoods

Increased and more equitable access of the poor to assets and other resources for sustainable livelihoods

3. Human Development and Basic Social Services

Increased access to and utilization of quality basic social services, especially for women, children, and disadvantaged groups

4. Governance Strengthened national capacities for the promotion and protection of rights

The UNDAF outcomes have been elaborated upon by clear joint country programme Outcomes as well as country programme Outputs in the Results Matrix (Annex 1). The Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Framework (Annex 2) lays out the method of monitoring progress and offers for each Output the requisite indicators, means of verification, baselines, targets, as well as assumptions and risks. Annex 3 presents the M&E Calendar during the UNDAF implementation period.

11


1.1 Country Background1. Covering an area of 17,364 km2 and situated between South Africa and Mozambique, Swaziland is a small landlocked country with a population of around one million people of which about 70 percent lives in rural areas. The politicalsystem in Swaziland is an evolving balance between modern institutions and a monarchy with constitutional powers entrusted to the King. The new Constitution that becameeffective in January 2006 provides for separation of powers between the executive, legislative and judicial arms of Government and stipulates various individual rights.

1.2 Existing Challenges 2. The Complementary Country Assessment (CCA) identified several major manifestations of Swaziland’s socio-economic condition. These are summarised below.

1.2.1 The HIV and AIDS Challenge3. The human toll of HIV and AIDS in Swaziland is a tragic reality being experienced by families, communities and the nation at large. There is no aspect of life in Swaziland that has not directly or indirectly been adversely influenced by HIV and AIDS, and the pandemic has become the major cause of illness and death among young and middle aged Swazis, depriving households and society of a critical human resource base and thereby reversing the social and economic gains the country has attained. Further, the feminisation of the disease means that young women are at greater risk of contracting HIV than young men. In addition, HIV and AIDS are altering the Swazi population structure and the functioning of the productive sectors by limiting productivity and the supply of services, while simultaneously increasing the demand for adequate and qualitative health and other social services. Consequently, the nation has continued to witness a break down in social service delivery; reduction in household incomes; and a less-than-optimal national economic growth rate that is necessary to propel the Kingdom out of poverty. In the light of these challenges, HIV and AIDS have been identified as one of the four Pillars of the 2011-2015 UNDAF (see Chapter 2 for more details).

1.2.2 High Poverty Levels4. Swaziland has a relatively high GDP per capita income of US$2,415. Despite this, about 69 per cent of the country’s 1.018 million people live below the national poverty line. Income distribution is skewed in Swaziland. According to the Swaziland Household Income and Expenditure Survey (SHIES) of 2001, 56 percent of wealth is held by the richest 20 percent while the poorest 20 percent own less than 4.3 percent. The country has recorded a Gini Coefficient of 51 percent, which is considered great inequality according to the international standard. Income inequality of this magnitude is one of the major contributory factors to the high poverty level in the country. Swaziland’s target under the MDGs is to reduce the income inequality – from 51 percent in 2001 to 25 percent in 2015.

IntroductionSection

1

12


1.2.3 Sluggish Economic Growth 5. Since the 1990s, Swaziland’s economic growth has significantly weakened, reversing positive prior made at a time when the country recorded significant Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows due, in part, to Southern Africa’s military and political turmoil, particularly in Namibia, Mozambique and South Africa. The country’s GDP growth rate has been declining in the last two decades, a state of affairs that has been worsened by recurrent droughts, declining export receipts, volatile exchange rates, the erosion of preferences, the country’s loss of textile quotas on the EU market in 2005, etc. The net result of the sluggish economic growth over the years has translated into significant adverse effects on social sector expenditures that have contributed to the worsening poverty levels. Unemployment has increased and the Human Development Index (HDI) reached a peak of 0.623 in 1990 before declining to 0.572 in 2007.1

1.2.4 Weak Human Development and Fragile Basic Services Delivery6. The country witnessed a reversal of its human development achievements in the last decade as evidenced by a decline in the Human Development Index (HDI) from 0.641 in 1995 to 0.572 in 2007. Decelerating population, weak educational and training systems and frail health systems continue to hamper human development and access to quality, basic social services, which are inequitably accessed by the population owing to weak human resource capacity for the provision of such social services. The country also faces significant systemic challenges, with the increased burden of communicable, non-communicable and epidemic diseases. Consequently, the infant and maternal mortality ratios have increased by 26 percent and 160 percent, respectively, within the last decade. With an HIV prevalence of 26 percent and estimated TB incidence of 1,198/100,000 population, the country has the highest burden of both diseases in the world. About 40 percent of the population, especially in rural areas, has no access to potable water, while 55 percent lacks proper sanitation. Similarly, the educational system remains generally weak despite improvements in enrollment, and is characterized by inadequate capacity of institutions, high drop-out and repetition rates and inadequate access, quality and oversight. In view of the challenges that it represents, human development and basic social services has been included as one of the four UNDAF pillars over the 2011 – 2015 period (see chapter 2 for details).

1.2.5 Governance 7. The Constitution passed in 2005 provides for fundamental rights and freedoms as well as greater decentralization in the provision of services. Partners still have to address other issues related to human rights; the protection of social, cultural and economic rights; transparency and accountability in public sector management; strengthening justice delivery systems; and fast tracking the domestication of international and regional conventions and treaties. The recently-established Human Rights and Public Administration Commission requires further strengthening and support to perform its functions effectively. Since governance is strategic to the work of the UN in Swaziland, this field has been included as one of the four UNDAF Pillars over the period 2011-2015 (see Chapter 2 for details).

1.2.6 Food Security and Nutrition Challenges8. Swaziland has experienced declining food production over the last decade due to successive years of drought attributed to climate change; multi-dimensional impacts of HIV and AIDS; dependence onproduction under rain-fed conditions; and declining use of improved agricultural technology. The result is a widening food disparity at the national level and increasing dependence on imports to fill production gaps. However, the capacity to import food is threatened by reductions in export earnings due to the globalfinancial downturn.

Hunger and malnutrition, which are prevalent in Swaziland, are a direct consequence of household food insecurity. It is estimated that a quarter of the population is food insecure and dependent on assistance, and 39 percent of children under five are stunted, which is above the WHO thresholds. The factors contributing to food insecurity are low agricultural production and productivity; negative impact of HIV and AIDS; and poverty.

1 UNDP, Human Development Report 2008/2009, New York, 2009

13


Although the majority of the households in Swaziland consider agriculture to be their main livelihood, with the staple maize being the dominant crop, in reality, most of the food consumed is derived from cash purchases. Since income is a major determinant of food security in Swaziland, many poor people cannotaccess adequate food and nutrition.

Other factors undermining nutrition include poor access to safe water and sanitation; poor care practices; inappropriate infant and young child feeding practices; and poor maternal hygiene and disease burden. Insufficient access to safe drinking water poses a challenge to proper food preparation, while poor sanitary conditions increase exposure to diseases that affect food utilization. There are rural-urban differences in nutritional status, with the former having much more prevalence than the latter. There is also a disparity between boys and girls, with more boys malnourished than girls.

1.2.7 Gender Equality9. The Constitution provides for gender equality, and according to the 2007 Progress Report on the MDGsfor Swaziland, there are signs that positive progress is being registered. Notwithstanding the registered progress, several challenges remain and include the following:

(a) While the education policy enables both boys and girls to access education equally, there evidence that the participation of boys outweighs that of girls. Though the difference is marginal, average female participation is 49.2 percent. (b) Women are worse-off in terms of poverty prevalence due to their low participation in formal sector

employment. A significant proportion of women are employed in the informal sector.(c) There is still inequitable access to education. Although female enrolments are increasing in tertiary education, they tend to have higher enrolments in lower-return tertiary programmes. (d) Women continue to be considered minors before some laws and in practice, and access to Swazi

Nation Land (SNL) by women remains a challenge. Access to Title Deed Land (TDL) is equally challenging for women.

(e) Gender-based violence is a major problem affecting mainly women and children. In the lifetime of a woman, about a third experience some form of sexual violence.

(f) Although the situation of representation of women in positions and structures of decision making is improving, the target to reach 50 percent is yet to be attained. (g) There is higher HIV and AIDS exposure for women than men with women carrying a disproportionate burden of care. Unsafe sexual practices, combined with behavioural and socio-cultural and economic factors, exacerbate women and girls’ vulnerability to the pandemic.

1.2.8 Unsustainable Environmental Conditions 10. The emerging threat to Swaziland’s sustainable development is climate change, with adverse effects already being observed on the environment itself, human health, food security, economic activity, and physical infrastructure. The country is currently threatened by a decrease in perennial surface drainage, which will have major impacts on river flow and soil-water content, with potentially serious socio-economic repercussions, particularly in rural areas. While the national frameworks are in place, integration and mainstreaming of environment sustainability into core development processes have remained a challenge for the country. Currently, the country has no climate change policies or legislation, and there are limited institutional capacities to cope with the looming environmental catastrophe. This state of affairs hasresulted in the following:

(a) The absence of environment sustainability policies, particularly about addressing the depletion of natural resources at grassroots level, which has reduced opportunities for positive action. The main-streaming of environmental issues in national development planning, monitoring and evaluation is almost non-existence, and national and sectoral investments have not integrated climate change in their interventions.

(b) There is increased water insecurity. Changes in flow regimes of shared water resources due to climate change are poised to adversely affect water availability for energy, agricultural

production and domestic use in Swaziland.

14


(c) There is a threat of reduced agricultural productivity as a result of changing environmental conditions. (d) There is increased health risk since the changing weather and local climatic conditions are creating an environment conducive to the breeding of vectors that transmit killer disease such as

Malaria.

1.3 Government Development Frameworks 11. In response to the economic and social challenges catalogued in 1.2 above, the Government of Swaziland has put in place several measures and initiatives that are intended to provide a roadmap towards economic and social recovery. The Government has identified its developmental priorities in one of its major policy documents, namely, the Smart Programme on Economic Empowerment and Development (SPEED). This policy Document identifies poverty alleviation, the fight against HIV and AIDS and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals as some of the key areas of development requiring urgent attention. Earlier policy documents included the Economic Recovery Commission Report (ERC) of 1995; the first Economic and Social Reform Agenda (ESRA1) of 1997 and ESRA2 of 1999; and the National Development Strategy (NDS) adopted in 1999.

12. More recently, Swaziland’s policies are presented in the Poverty Reduction Strategy and ActionProgramme (PRSAP), which was approved by Cabinet in September 2007 and runs over the period 2007-2015. The PRSAP is the Government’s medium- to long-term development framework and action programme and aims at facilitating sustainable economic growth and poverty reduction. Government policies under the PRSAP lay stress on (a) macro-economic stability; (b) good governance; (c) equitable access to productive assets; (d) human capital development; (e) a policy and regulatory climate which stimulates the private sector in order to accelerate job creation, business development and income-generating opportunities; (f) rural development to stimulate agricultural and other non-agricultural activities; and (g) provision of infrastructure, extension services, technology, markets, social services, and financial services. The PRSAP is inspired by the Vision 2022 that was launched in 1999 whose aspiration is that “by the year 2022, the Kingdom of Swaziland will be in the top 10 percent of the medium human development group of countries founded on sustainable economic development, social justice and political stability.”

13. There is also the Government Programme of Action 2008-2013 whose priorities could be clustered into five main areas, namely, (a) prudent management of the economy to ensure macro-economic stability and rapid, sustainable economic growth and development; (b) poverty reduction, job creation and food security; (c) efficient access to, and delivery of, basic social services (education, health, water, etc); (d)strengthening governance institutions for improved governance; and (e) disaster risk reduction especially for vulnerable groups. Government policies have also been guided by global frameworks, such as the MDGs and the six Dakar Education for All (EFA) goals.

14. Specifically with respect to the area of HIV and AIDS, Swaziland’s national response is drawn from the National Multi-Sectoral HIV and AIDS Policy introduced in 2006. The goal of the Policy is to “create an enabling environment for the national response to the HIV and AIDS epidemic.” The policy aims to provide a comprehensive and multi-sectoral framework for the national HIV and AIDS response. It is based on the ‘three ones’ principle: one action framework, one national coordinating authority, and one Monitoring and Evaluation system (M&E). The new National Multi-sectoral Strategic Framework for HIV and AIDS (NSF), covering the 2009-2014 period, builds on the achievements and lessons learned from the review of the National Strategic Plan II (NSP II). The National Strategic Framework (NSF) comprises four main areas: prevention; treatment, care and support; impact mitigation; and response management.

15. Regarding Human Development and Social Services Delivery, a number of policies have been put in place to address the challenges. The revised National Health Policy of 2007 addresses the health sector response to the growing disease burden. At this level, Government, through the Ministry of Health, seeks to improve the health and social welfare of the people of Swaziland by providing preventive services that are of high quality, relevant, accessible, affordable, equitable and socially acceptable. Several other

15


complementary policies that address the various facets of human development are in place. They include the National Multi-sectoral HIV and AIDS Policy (2006), National Social Welfare Policy (2008), the Sexual and Reproductive Health Policy (2002), National Youth Policy (2008) and the National Children’s Policy 2009.The National Social Development Policy, in particular, provides a framework for improving the quality of life or human well-being through the provision of appropriate social welfare services that aredevelopmental in nature. The National Policy on Children including Orphans and Vulnerable Children aims to provide policy guidelines to ensure that appropriate interventions are put in place to adequately care for and protect children. The Government has also ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1995. It has also provided for special protection to children in the Constitution. Morerecently, Government has dedicated 15 percent of the budget to the health sector, and effective January 2010, the State will roll out free primary education. The Government’s Programme of Action (2008-2013) provides a roadmap, which spells out 23 priorities that include a healthy nation, an educated and skilled nation, a food-secure nation, protection and empowerment of vulnerable and disadvantaged groups, a safe and secure nation and poverty alleviation.

16. With respect to Food Security and Nutrition, Swaziland is a signatory to a number of international agreements on food security.2 In addition, the country has taken several measures in the formulation of legislation, policies and strategies as part of the creation of an enabling environment for food security and nutrition. The PRSAP seeks inter alia to combat declining agricultural production; reduce poor yields in drought-prone areas; improve agricultural marketing information systems; empower and improve the skills of the poor; and ensure food security and proper nutrition especially for vulnerable groups. Food security and nutrition-related policies that have been formulated and adopted include the Livestock Development Policy; the Food Security Policy; the National Disaster Management Policy that aims to prevent or reduce the impact of disasters on vulnerable communities and groups; and the Swaziland Food and Nutrition Policy (in draft as of end of 2009).

17. At the level of Gender Equality, the Constitution guarantees equal rights between men and women. A number of key national and sectoral policies and strategies recognize the need to address genderinequalities in the country. With the support of the UN system, the country has developed a Gender Policy, which was submitted for Cabinet approval in 2009. Swaziland is also a signatory to a number of international conventions and agreements that have a bearing on gender equality and equity.3

Strategies for the implementation of the policies and programmes in the gender area include several pieces of legislation that include the Marriage Act; the Sexual Offences and Domestic Violence Bill; and the draft Land Policy and the Deeds and Registry Act. Gender equality issues have also been mainstreamed in the PRSAP, the Population Policy, the Children’s Policy, and the National Strategic Framework on HIV and AIDS. In terms of institutional capacity strengthening, Government has established the Gender Coordination Unit under the Deputy Prime Minister’s Office. Moreover,the Sexual Offences Unit within the Swaziland Police Service has been decentralized to ensure access to high quality crime prevention and management services by more citizens.

18. Lastly, with respect to Environment, the Rio Declaration (1992) called for the integration of environmental protection in development, which in Swaziland led to the development of the National Environmental Action Plan. The Swaziland Environment Authority Act (2002) established the Swaziland Environmental Authority (SEA) a parastatal that has the responsibility to protect the environment. The Ozone Regulation (2003) addresses the control and licensing system on the import and export of ozone depleting substances. At the global level, Swaziland signed the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change

2 These include: the Rome Declaration on World Food Security (1996); Declaration of the World Food Summit (2002); International Conference on Nutrition (1992); the FAO Committee on World Food Security Right to Food Guidelines (2004); and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1996).

3 These include the United Nations Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment; The Universal declaration of Human rights; The Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights; the Convention on Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women; the Convention on Child Rights and the International Conference on Population and Development Plan of Action.

16


(UNFCC) in 1992 and ratified the Convention in 1996. While the policies create an enabling environment for sustained development, the main challenge is that sector policies are generally ‘silent’ on climate change, thus, making it difficult to mainstream environmental issues into Government actions/programmes.

1.4 UNDAF Preparation Approach19. Overall, the UNDAF preparatory process has been inclusive and consultative at different levels, both within the UN System and between the UN and its strategic partners, including Government, international partners, the private sector and civil society. Through the Joint Steering Committee, Government assumed leadership of the UNDAF development process. The Committee includes senior UN officials and a high profile team of Government Principal Secretaries from the Ministry of Economic Planning and Development; the Deputy Prime Minister’s Office; Ministry of Natural Resources and Energy; Ministry of Agriculture; and Ministry of Education. Government co-chairs the Joint Steering Committee and provides leadership for the series of meetings that involved Government, the UN, civil society stakeholders and development partners. The Committee provided oversight for coordination, harmonization and analysis of a range of technical inputs into the UNDAF preparatory process.

20. To improve the quality of the inputs into the process of developing the UNDAF, specially-arranged training programmes for both UN staff and partners were conducted in the field of programming (e.g. in Results-based Management and Human Rights-based approach). The consultative process was also used during the development of important deliverables that preceded the UNDAF preparation. These included the Mid Term Review (MTR) of the UNDAF and Agency-specific Country Programme Action Plans (CPAPs). The box below summarizes the approach used to prepare this UNDAF. It reveals the inclusive and consultative character of this process.

17


UNDAF ROLL-OUT PROCESS

The UNDAF preparation Guidelines were used as a general guide during the preparation of the UNDAF. The following activities formed the UNDAF preparation process:

• Country Program Action Plans (CPAPs) that were prepared by Agencies provided important inputs to the UNDAF preparatory process to the extent that they provided valuable information related to Agency-level operational systems and actual interventions, which, in an important way, underscored the UN comparative advantage in Swaziland. The mid-term reviews of CPAPs also informed the formulation of the UNDAF.

• The Mid-term Review (MTR) of the 2006-2010 UNDAF brought to the surface the level and types of challenges that had to be taken into account during the preparation of the 2011-2015 UNDAF. The findings of the MTR were shared at every opportunity with stakeholders, providing valuable lessons during the preparation of this UNDAF.

• An UNDAF Plan of Engagement (PoE) was developed, which identified landmark events, processes and timelines in the development of the UNDAF. The PoE was shared and agreed on with government, partners, Quality Support Assurance (QSA) and UNDOCO who supported and facilitated training and workshops that were arranged as important inputs into the UNDAF preparation.

• An UNDAF Joint Steering Committee (JSC) was established. It was co-chaired by government and a Head of Agency and comprised of representatives of Civil Society Organizations (CSO) and international partners. The JSC provided strategic leadership to all the stages of developing UNDAF and ensured that the UNDAF outcomes reflected national priorities.

• Preparation of Complementary Country Assessment: This was prepared by the UNCT through the input of the Policy Support Group (PSG). This was based on the realisation that the challenges raised in the CCA that informed the 2006-2010 UNDAF were still valid and the fact that the UNCT had just concluded a Mid Term Review of the current UNDAF and the government, UN agencies, and development partners, including the World Bank, the EC, the IMF had conducted comprehensive analyses of various aspects of the development challenges facing Swaziland. UNCT, thus, recognised that there already existed an adequate body of information on the development challenges facing Swaziland which only required organization and consolidation. The UNCT approved nine themes for inclusion in the Complementary Country Analysis, namely, Sustainable economic growth; Poverty reduction; Human development and basic service delivery; Governance; HIV and AIDS; Food security and nutrition; Gender equality; Environment, and M&E and knowledge management. As part of this process, internal training was conducted on Human Rights Based Approach for Policy Support Group, followed by training on the same for external partners. Both internal and external validation of CCA results was also conducted. UNDOCO, UN Staff College and the UNHCHR facilitated the HRBA training workshop. The draft CCA was approved by UNCT and JSC and submitted to QSA for review.

• Orientation workshops for staff and stakeholders; Complementary Country Analysis; SWOT analysis: These series of events involved stakeholder engagement on the UNDAF roll out process, analysis of national development challenges and of UN agency comparative advantage as well as the identification of critical partnerships. These processes were performed by the UN in collaboration with Government and all other stakeholders in the country

• Strategic Planning Retreat (SPR): The aim of the Retreat was two-fold, namely, (a) training of UN personnel and stakeholders on the strategic planning processes associated with UNDAF design and implementation; and (b) actual identification, deliberation and consensus reached on country priorities to be targeted under UNDAF. The SPR validated the national development challenges that are reflected in the Draft Complementary Country Analysis and participants agreed broadly on the comparative advantage of the UN. Four UNDAF Pillars were agreed through a voting process among all the participants. These were HIV and AIDS; Poverty and Sustainable Livelihoods; Human Development and Basic Social Services; and Governance. The SPR Retreat also agreed that three implementation/operational issues be considered as important cross-cutting focal areas in this UNDAF, namely, (a) Monitoring and Evaluation; (b) Capacity Development; and (c) ICT.

• Thematic Working Groups and Finalisation of UNDAF Document: After the SPR, the UNCT constituted four Thematic Working Groups (TWGs) that mirrored the four UNDAF Pillars. Again, in the spirit of inclusiveness, membership of TWGs included UN personnel, Government and selected stakeholders. The TWGs identified UNDAF Outputs and developed Results Matrices for each one of the four UNDAF Pillars. The matrices were later submitted to the UNCT for discussion and endorsement after which they were relayed to the UNDAF Consultant who put together drafts of the UNDAF Document, which benefited from JSC, UNCT, QSA and stakeholder validations. The UNDAF was finally signed by all UN Agency heads and the Government of Swaziland.

18


1.5 UN Comparative Advantage21. There are six agencies represented in Swaziland: UNICEF, UNDP, UNFPA, WFP, WHO and UNAIDS. Non-resident agencies include FAO, UNESCO, UNODC and ILO. Notwithstanding their non-resident status, they participated fully in the UNDAF process. The UN comparative advantage in Swaziland includes the following:

(a) UN has the mandate to address human development and associated challenges.(b) UN possesses the know-how in the social and governance spheres.(c) UN has the capacity to mobilise and leverage resources from a diversity of sources.(d) UN has global reach with respect to expertise and knowledge brokering.(e) UN possesses convening powers.

1.6 Strategic Issues Underpinning the UNDAF22. A number of strategic issues have been identified that underpin UNDAF. They are presented below.

(a) Anchoring UNDAF in National Priorities: This relates to the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness principle of alignment with national priorities. The Government has stated its broad priority areas to which the UN system and any other development partners are expected to align their support. In this regard, all the four Pillars chosen for the UNDAF (HIV and AIDS, Poverty and Sustainable Livelihoods, Human Development and Basic Social Services and Governance) mirror Swaziland’s expressed priority areas.

(b) Coherence: The UNDAF design has benefited from the notion of ‘Delivering as One’ (DaO) that was launched by the UN in 2006. The collaborating UN Agencies under UNDAF committed themselves to offer ‘good practices’ in broad functional areas that include joint programming with a view to avoiding unjustified duplication of work; minimizing transaction costs; and simplifying and harmonising procedures, including at the level of M&E.

(c) Strengthened Partnership: This principle calls for the enhancement of true partnership through effective dialogue and information sharing with both the state and non-state actors. There is need by existing cooperating partners (both resident and non-resident) to leverage possible partnerships more creatively. The development and nurturing of more collaborative partnership between the UN and the few cooperating partners in place, such as the World Bank, the African Development Bank, the US Government, the Italian Cooperation and the EU, will be strengthened to capture competencies and specialisations that reside outside the UN System. Strong partnership between the UN System and Government is an equally important prerequisite to the successful implementation of UNDAF goals. The role of non-state actors is also recognised as being strategic in fostering the required strong partnership with all major stakeholders and in the delivery of results under UNDAF.

(d) Capacity Development: At the national level and in the light of the CCA findings, there is growing realisation that institutions matter. For a country like Swaziland with serious developmental challenges, an effective poverty reduction strategy, for example, is best built on a platform of strong national capacity to formulate policies; capacity to build consensus; capacity to implement reform; and capacity to monitor results, learn lessons and adapt accordingly. In Swaziland, capacity enhancement effort promises maximum benefit if it is targeted at the improvement of the quality of civil servants; sophistication of organisational attributes; diffusion of ICTs within the national system; strengthening of intergovernmental relations, including opportunities for the implementation of the Decentralisation Policy; and the style of interaction between Government and its social and economic partners that include non-state actors. Accordingly, capacity development will be strengthened and mainstreamed across programmes as the strategic premise for, and driver of, UNDAF. Capacity of institutions, personnel and systems will be enhanced as part of the comprehensive strategy for UNDAF implementation.

19


(e) Strengthening Management Support Systems: Information is increasingly being recognised as one of the major drivers of the evolving global economy. Availability of information enables the public to participate meaningfully in governance issues, and promotes transparency and accountability in the management of national affairs. Today, Information, Communication and Technology (ICT) form the backbone of industries and is increasingly becoming a value-adding component in the strengthening of management support systems in Governments. The extent to which Swaziland can benefit from this revolution largely depends on the strategies and actions for the development of its ‘information infrastructure.’

(f) Human Rights-Based Approach: The human rights approach to programming is based on the understanding that all people are born equal and that these rights are inalienable and should be accessed by all. The activities that will be delivered under UNDAF will be founded on human rights and their benefits shall be equally accessed by all. The design of interventions will be informed and guided by human rights considerations, and it will be ensured that such rights are mainstreamed across programmes.

(g) Results-Based Management: The programming of UNDAF used the approach of Results-Based Management as a planning and management tool that assisted the UN Agencies and their stakeholders to better identify developmental needs and how they can be realized. The focus is on results (i.e., the desired future state) and the identification of indicators against which to measure progress towards those results. Both the Results and M&E matrices used the principles of results-based management. The process used during the preparation of the UNDAF (see the box above under section 1.4) employed results-based management as the core tool for programming. In an inclusive and consultative manner, the UNDAF preparatory process identified the UNDAF and country/agency level outcomes, outputs, indicators (and the means of their verification), baselines, targets, assumptions and risks. The results-based management planning tool, therefore, offers more logical programming and will make monitoring of the UNDAF interventions more structured.

1.7 Lessons Learnt from UNDAF 2006-201023. Based on the findings of the UNDAF Mid-term Review, a number of lessons are noteworthy from the 2006-2010 UNDAF that have helped during the preparation of this second phase. The following lessons are important in this regard:

UNDAF Management and Implementation Mechanisms1. For the UN notion of Delivering as One to work, Agency headquarters need to work more towards the

simplification and harmonization agenda in ways that would eliminate the current diversity between them, regarding the multiple layers of generally un-harmonised rules, procedures, programming arrangements, reporting and accountability systems.

2. UNDAF Outcomes should not be too long-term in nature as this poses some difficulty in measuring their success record within UNDAF’s short-term (five-year) time coverage. Too much expectation at the level of UNDAF outputs therefore, should, be avoided given the limited human and financial resource base at the disposal of the UN System. In this regard, there is merit in allowing UNDAFs to target substantial investment in fewer, well defined focal activities in a way that is aligned to existing capacities within both the UN and national systems.

3. While it is important to have an effective dialogue mechanism at the highest political level, a structured dialogue mechanism at the technical level is equally as important because this will give the UNDAF the opportunity to interface more directly with the implementers of government programmes.

4. Clarity regarding the acceptable level of harmonisation of systems and procedures is cardinal. In this regard, there is value in focusing joint effort by UN Agencies more on those thematic areas where the opportunities for collaborative work promise better results than trying to jointly programme everything, even where diversity of mechanisms promises better results.

20


UNDAF Monitoring and Evaluation24. The MTR of the 2006-2010 UNDAF also concluded that the Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) system should be carefully framed for it to serve as an effective template for monitoring the performance of UNDAF programmes. Particular care, it was concluded, should be given to the identification of anticipated risks and assumptions as these are important aspects in the determination of project/activity success. Careful identification of indicators in the M&E Framework is equally important to allow for more effective tracking of performance.

21


2.1 Introduction25. This Section presents the salient aspects of the four UNDAF Pillars, including the key priority areas for the period 2011-2015. Annex 1 gives the Results matrices. The selection of the UNDAF priority areas has been guided by both the national priorities and MDGs. Four Pillars have been selected for the 2011-2015 UNDAF:, HIV and AIDS; Poverty and Sustainable Livelihoods; Human Development and Basic Social Services; and Governance. The matrix below demonstrates the link among UNDAF, Swaziland national priorities and the MDGs. This is followed by the presentation of each one of the four selected UNDAF Pillars.

UNDAF Pillar UNDAF Outcomes National Goals MDGS/UN Declarations

1. HIV and AIDS

To contribute to reduced new HIV infections and improved quality of life of persons infected and affected by HIV by 2015

1. Swaziland’sHuman Development Index (HDI) improved from 0.5 in 2008 to 0.55 in 2014

2. To infections, reverse the spread of HIV and reduce the vulnerability of affected individuals and families

Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases

2. Povery and sustainable livehoods

Increased and more equitable access of the poor to assets and other resources for sustainable livelihoods

1. To reduce poverty by more than 50% by 2015 and then ultimately eradicate it by 20222. To create an environment that will empower the poor to participate actively in uplifting their standards of living

Goal 1: Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger

Goal 7: Ensure environmental sustainability

3. Human development and basic social services

Increased access to and utilization of quality basic social services, especially for women, children, and disadvantaged groups by 2015

Universal access to quality basic social services achieved by 2022

Goal 2: Achieve universal primary education

Goal 3: Promote gender equality and empower women

Goal 4: Reduce child mortalityGoal 5: Improve maternal health

Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases

4.Governance

Strengthened national capacities for the promotion and protection of rights

Improving governance and strengthening institutions

United Nations Millennium Declaration

UNDAF ResultsSection

1

2

22


2.2 UNDAF Pillar 1: HIV and AIDS2.2.1 Background26. HIV and AIDS continue to be an overwhelming crisis, rapidly spreading and impacting deeply on the social, cultural and economic aspects of the Swazi nation. The rising prevalence of the HIV and AIDS infection rates and its consequences are putting enormous pressure on already-stretched social services systems, particularly healthcare. Over half of all hospital beds are occupied by patients with HIV and AIDS-related illnesses, leading to congestion in the hospital wards. The crude death rate had increased as a result of AIDS mortality, from 10 in 1990 to 24 deaths per 1,000 populations in 2007 – a level usually seen in conflicts or natural emergencies. In 2006, the WHO estimated that two thirds of all deaths in the country were due to AIDS.

27. According to the first Swaziland Demographic and Health Survey (SDHS) for 2006/07, the overall adult prevalence of HIV and AIDS is 26 percent, which makes Swaziland the country with the highest disease prevalence in the world. Regional HIV prevalence in Swaziland shows that the epidemic has spread fairly uniformly across the four regions, and the level of prevalence depicts insignificant variations between urban and rural areas. While the hyper-epidemic is generalised to all population groups, women and young adults are the hardest hit, with more women infected (31 percent) than men (21 percent). The HIV and AIDS epidemic has also placed children under an increased state of vulnerability. As much as 31 percent of children in Swaziland are orphaned or made vulnerable by HIV and AIDS.

28. In the light of the above, developmental challenges in the area of HIV and AIDS include the following:

(a) Adverse impact of HIV and AIDS on productiv-ity and human resources, particularly in terms of lost productivity as measured by staff absentee-ism and attrition.

(b) Increasing number of orphans and vulnerable children.(c) Deepening poverty levels due to HIV and AIDS through the threat on economic and agricultural

livelihoods as a result of loss of breadwinners and knowledge and skills necessary to sustain livehoods.(d) Challenges of fighting stigma due to HIV and AIDS.

29. The facts presented above give the rationale for the inclusion of HIV and AIDS as one of the Pillars in the UNDAF in the period 2011-2015. The UNDAF Outcome for this Pillar is: To contribute to reduction of new HIV infections and improved quality of life of persons infected and affected by HIV by 2015.

2.2.2 Role of the UN30. The national response to the challenges brought about by HIV and AIDS is perhaps the most organised one. It is conducted through the Joint UN Programme of Support on HIV and AIDS 2009-2015 (JUNPS). The JUNPS will remain the operational plan for the UNDAF pillar on HIV and AIDS. Taking into account the current situation with respect to HIV and AIDS, the following offer opportunities for cooperation in this area during the UNDAF period:

(a) Support to improve coordination according to the Three Ones Principle. (b) Address the number of orphans and vulnerable children and the elderly as a result of HIV and

AIDS. (c) Support the fight against stigma due to HIV and AIDS.(d) Support behavioural change in the face of the HIV and AIDS pandemic.

UNDAF Pillar 1: HIV and AIDS

UNDAF outcome To contribute to reduced new HIV infections and improvequality of life of persons infected and affected by HIV by 2015

Joint Country Programme Outcomes1. Risky behaviour for prevention of HIV reduced2. Access to comprehensive HIV treatment, care and

support increased3. Impact mitigation services for vulnerable children,

PLHIV and the elderly scaled-up4. HIV and AIDS response effectively managed at all

levels

Related MDG: Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseaseso Target 7: Halt and begin to reverse the spread of

HIV/AIDSo Target 8: Halt and begin to reverse the incidence of

malaria and other major diseases

23


(e) Strengthen research and national M&E System in the area of HIV and AIDS. (f) Assist treatment, care and support of PLHIV.(g) Support impact mitigation.(h) Support voluntary counselling and testing and prevention of mother to child transmission.

2.3 UNDAF Pillar 2: Poverty and Sustainable Livelihoods2.3.1 Background31. Although Swaziland has a GDP per capita of US$2,415, about 69 per cent of its 1.018 million people live below the national poverty line. The majority of households in the country depend on subsistence agriculture, which has been under-performing for many years due to a host of factors that include drought, and the inability to procure the necessary inputs and effectively utilise Swazi Nation Land. Consequently, a large proportion of the vulnerable households is food-insecure and relies on food assistance. Heavy reliance on maize production and dependency on rain-fed agriculture on one hand, and limited, off-farm employment opportunities on the other hand, have continued to impact adversely on livelihoods. The prevailing dry spells; high cost of agricultural production; reduced arable land; and the impact of the high HIV and AIDS prevalence have combined to exacerbate the already poor agricultural performance, thereby, pushing the population of Swaziland deeper into poverty and hunger. The FAO/WFP Crop and Food Supply Assessment Mission to Swaziland (2007) observed that 21 percent of the nation’s households are food insecure.

32. Most of the vulnerable people are children. Malnutrition of children under five years of age has remained one of the major indicators for people who suffer hunger. Present statistics indicate that 39 percent of under-fives are stunted, threatening the attainment of the MDG goal on infant mortality. Poverty in Swaziland has, indeed, taken a ‘child face’ as more and more children confront the reality of losing parents and the subsequent increases in the various types of vulnerabilities that they are exposed to.

33. Swaziland aims to reduce absolute poverty by half by 2015 and its eradication by 2022 as per the MDGs and National Development Strategy (NDS) targets, respectively. The NDS target is, however, a daunting one considering the reality that, as the 2007 MDG Progress Report showed, unless the development tempo is expedited and the HIV and AIDS pandemic tackled, Swaziland is likely to attain only three MDGs by 2015 (i.e., universal primary education, gender equity and women empowerment, and environmental sustainability). Swaziland will certainly not attain MDG1 on the eradication of extreme poverty and hunger. Nor will it be able to ‘halt and reverse’ the spread of HIV and AIDS (MDG 6), which is central to addressing poverty and hunger, amongmany of the other goals. 34. Income inequality in Swaziland is among the worst in the world.4 Partly because of low incomes and other structural constraints, the poor have limited access to quality services. The current weak planning capacity for social services provisioning explains this problem; the UN’s comparative advantage at this level should help. The absence of effectively decentralization systems of delivery has also complicated the challenges associated with services delivery. Lack of access to, and control of productive assets on the part of the majority, and absence of power and capacity to participate in policy-choices and in decisions affecting their lives, are central to the disempowerment that explains low human development in Swaziland.

Pillar 2: Poverty and Sustainable Livelihoods

UNDAF Outcomes: Increased and more equitable access of the poor to assets and other resources for sustainable livelihoodsJoint Country Programme Outcomes: 1. The poor’s access to productive resources increased2. Effective social protection systems that secure the

livelihoods of vulnerable communities in place3. Capacity of government and partners to address

hunger and food insecurity among vulnerable groups is strengthened

Related MDG: Goal 1:Eradicate extreme poverty and hungero Target 1: Reduce by half the proportion of people living

on less than a dollar a dayo Target 2: Reduce by half the proportion of people who

suffer from hungerGoal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainabilityo Target 7a: Integrate the principles of sustainable

development into country policies and programmes; reverse loss of environmental resourceso Target 7b: Reduce biodiversity loss, achieving, by 2010,

a significant reduction in the rate of losso Target 7c: Reduce by half the proportion of people

without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation

o Target 7d: Achieve significant improvement in lives of at least 100 million slum dwellers, by 2020

24


35. Against this background, the UNDAF choice of Poverty and Sustainable Livelihoods as Pillar No. 2 is fully in line with the national priorities. The UNDAF Outcome for this Pillar is: Increased and more equitable access of the poor to assets and other resources for sustainable livelihoods.

2.3.2 Role of the UN36. Taking into account the current situation in the areas of Poverty and Sustainable Livelihoods, the UN in Swaziland will support the country, through UNDAF, in a number of areas, including the following:

(a) Strengthen the integration of the poor in the national economy through the creation of opportunities for production value chain in a way that allows the poor to benefit from their economic activities.

(b) Support national efforts to address structural economic inequalities through economic diversification that assist smallholder producers improve their productivity and incomes.

(c) Support the enhancement of social protection systems through the design of effective social protection systems, targeting different levels and categories of the poor and vulnerable.

(d) Support the Government to explore more sustainable ways of addressing hunger and malnutrition for the vulnerable groups.

(e) Promote internal trade for poverty reduction targeting SMEs and those in the informal sector. (f) Commission studies on the effects on the poor and livelihoods of environmental degradation and

climate change.(g) Build strong partnerships with local communities and grassroots organisations in the areas of the

design, implementation and monitoring of poverty-reduction programmes.(h) Build planning capacity that improves the targeting of poverty-reducing interventions.

4 According to the 2001 Swaziland Household Income and Expenditure Survey (SHIES), nationally, 56 percent of wealth is held by the richest 20 percent while the poorest 20 percent own less than 4.3 percent. Swaziland has recorded a Gini Coefficient of 51 percent (SHIES 2001), which is considered great inequality according to the international standard.

25


2.4 UNDAF Pillar 3: Human Development and Basic Social Services2.4.1 Background37. Swaziland achieved steady progress in its development indices since independence, increasing its HDI from 0.52 in 1975 to 0.641 in 1995. However, the country witnessed a reversal in the last decade.

38. It is becoming clear that, at the projected average growth of two percent in the medium-term, Swaziland’s prospects for registering positive progress in the area of human development remain under threat. The country is performing poorly on virtually all indicators that the Government, through its NDS, has operationally defined as constituting quality of life: poverty eradication, employment creation, social equity, gender parity, social integration and environmental protection. Swaziland had witnessed a reversal of some recent achievements in its Human Development Index (HDI). It deteriorated significantly from the 0 .641 estimate of 1995 to 0.572 in 2007, placing the country at 142 of 177 countries,5 a reality that suggests the country is still far from achieving its 2022 vision of being in the top 10 percent of the medium, human development group of countries.

39. Infant mortality rate has been worsening, from 67/1000 in 1996 to 85/1000 in 2006, and indicators of maternal health status continue to be unacceptable. The SDHS estimates that maternal mortality is currently 589 per 100,000 live births, suggesting that it has increased from an earlier estimate of 229 per 100,000 live births. Other indicators point to similar trends. For example, as much as 26 percent of pregnant women deliver at home unassisted, which significantly explains the abnormally high maternal mortality rate of 589/100,000 live births. Furthermore, statistics show that three percent of children are wasted and one percent severely wasted. Swaziland has also witnessed a drop in its population growth rate from two and nine-tenths percent in 1997 to below one percent in 2007. The high HIV prevalence partially explains this state of affairs. Current available data suggests that the country still has the highest HIV prevalence and TB incidence in the world (see above). The country has also experienced a general increase in disease burden due to the rising trend of other communicable and non-communicable diseases.

40. The population’s access to safe drinking water and proper sanitation, which are also major determinant of health and human development, is skewed in favour of the urban areas. Regional disparities in access to safe water and sanitation remain with Lubombo and Shiselweni regions being worst affected. According to the 2007 MDG Report, Swaziland is likely to achieve MDG 7 on environmental sustainability and access to clean water. Nevertheless, there are emerging concerns around air pollution and climate change that need to be addressed. In this regard, strengthening the country’s capacity for Environmental Impact assessment (EIA) is imperative – both to ensure that environmental regulations are followed and to avoid delays in the initiation of development projects as a result of the lack of an acceptable EIA.

UNDAF Pillar 3: Human Development and Basic Social Services

UNDAF Outcome: Increased access to and utilization of quality basic social services, especially for women, children and disadvantaged groups by 2015

Joint Country Programme Outcomes: 1. Effective and efficient social services delivery (particularly

in health, education, water and sanitation) in place2. Basic social services to vulnerable groups, including women

and children, equitably accessed

Related MDGs: Goal 2: Achieve universal primary educationo Target3: Ensure that all boys and girls complete a full course

of primary schoolingGoal 3: Promote gender equality and empower womeno Target 4: Eliminate gender disparity in primary and

secondary education preferably by 2005, and at all levels by 2015

Goal 4: Reduce child mortalityo Target 5: Reduce by two-thirds the mortality rate among

children under five Goal 5: Improve maternal healtho Target 6: Reduce by three-quarters the maternal mortality

ratio before 2015 Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases.o Target 7: Have halted by 2015 and begun to reverse the

spread of HIV/AIDSo Target 8: Have halted by 2015 and begun to reverse the

incidence of malaria and other major diseases.

5 UNDP, Human Development Report, New York, 2009.

26


41. On the education front, due to the recently introduced state-funded, lower primary education, school enrolment is expected to have increased significantly compared to the statistics that show 23 percent of eligible children could not access education in 2006. There is, however, a need to address the high dropout and repetition rates both in primary and secondary school levels. Other challenges to education include the lack of qualified teachers; an inadequate school infrastructure; and a weak policy and legislative framework.

2.4.2 Role of the UN42. In the light of the above, the choice of Human Development and Basic Social Services as Pillar No. 3 in this UNDAF addresses some of the major developmental challenges faced by Swaziland that are well articulated in the PRSAP and NDS. This Pillar’s UNDAF Outcome is aptly given as: Increased access to and utilization of quality basic social services, especially for women, children, and disadvantaged groups by 2015. In the context of this, the UN in Swaziland shall strive to extend support under UNDAF in the following areas:

(a) Support increased access to education for the poor and vulnerable groups.(b) Support qualitative improvements in education, focusing attention on class sizes (teacher-pupil

ratios) and educational materials supply, particularly in disadvantaged regions. (c) Strengthen the national health system.(d) Support improved human resource planning for sustainable development. (e) Support improved access to safe water and sanitation.(f) Support the strengthening of the social protection system.(g) Increase access to quality preventive and curative health care.

2.5 UNDAF Pillar 4: Governance2.5.1 Background43. The Constitution of the Kingdom of Swaziland is the overall guiding legislation for the country and recognises the value of protecting fundamental rights and freedoms. The Constitution also emphasizes greater decentralization and devolution as a means of improving accountability and service delivery. Swaziland is also a signatory to global and regional conventions, and treaties on human rights. The promotion of good governance is highlighted in some of the major policy documents, including the NDS, Vision 2022 and the PRSAP. Good governance, as recognised in the PRSAP, calls for the strengthening of the institutional capacities to action; prudent fiscal management; strengthening of the judicial system; enforcing the rule of law; protecting the rights and freedoms of citizens; ensuring participation by all in the decision-making process; implementing decentralization; and developing the capacity of modern and traditional institutions to better respond to the needs of the poor. The identification of Governance as one of the four Pillars of the UNDAF reflects the priorities of the Government of Swaziland. Notwithstanding the provisions of the Constitution, their implementation requires strengthening and support.

44. First, challenges are associated with the protection of social, cultural and economic rights. The country also lacks an integrated framework that can effectively monitor national and local progress towards the MDGs. Second, there are challenges related to transparency and accountability in public sector management. Optimization of the use of available resources through the strengthening of public finance management is yet to take hold as a component of good governance. Third, the absence of clear coordination among institutions involved in the fight against corruption continues to compromise the effectiveness of the newly established Anti-Corruption Commission.

45. Last, although democratic governance has expanded, outstanding challenges still limit people’s rights and freedoms to participation. In addition, the Swazi system of representation is based on the Tinkundla system under which members of Parliament are directly elected on a non-party individual basis. There is, none the less, a healthy debate on the efficacy of the system and recognition that civic education should be strengthened.

27


2.5.2 Role of the UN46. Taking into account the current situation in Swaziland, the decision during the UNDAF design stage to include Governance as one of its Pillars is a demonstration of the UN System’s readiness to assist Government in addressing the vexing challenges that persist. Considering that the chosen UNDAF Outcome in the field of Governance is ‘Strengthened national capacities for the promotion and protection of rights,’ the following offer opportunities for cooperation between the Government of Swaziland and the UN System during the 2011-2015 UNDAF implementation period:

(a) Support capacity improvements in the implementation of the Constitution and in the facilitation of legal provisions, including assistance towards the ratification and domestication of instruments and follow-through, with comprehensive policy changes and the establishment of operational plans.

(b) Address Gender and Human rights, including the rights of women and children.

(c) Enhance capacity for securing transparency and accountability in public sector management, including national efforts to reduce corruption in public offices through assistance to oversight institutions that include Parliament, Civil Society and the media.

(d) Strengthen national partnerships between the government and non-state actors in the national quest to collectively face developmental challenges.

(e) Strengthen mechanisms for enhanced citizen participation in governance.

2.6 Cross-cutting Issues47. In addition to the four UNDAF Pillars, the SPR Retreat agreed that three implementation/operational areas merit recognition as important cross-cutting factors during UNDAF implementation. These are (a) Monitoring and Evaluation; (b) capacity development; and (c) ICT. First, effective M&E at the national level and during UNDAF implementation within the UN System remain critical in managing for results. There is a growing global push to move decisively toward results-based monitoring that focuses on agreed targets and results. In the same vein, while monitoring immediate outputs is important, particularly because it allows for easier determination of resource use efficiency, it is becoming evident that the real test of effectiveness of interventions depends on the monitoring of longer-term outcomes and impacts.

48. Second, with respect to capacity development, there is recognition of the reality that no amount of planning will yield desirable results if the requisite capacity for implementing agreed interventions is weak. The building of these capacities, both within the Government system and the UN structures within Swaziland, remains pivotal. The enhancement of capacities of other partners, such as civil society bodies is equally important for their fuller engagement in UNDAF implementation. Last, ICT brings with it opportunities that promise to unravel human and organisational potential by efficiently and effectively executing their mandates under UNDAF. ICT also holds the promise of strengthening required data for effective monitoring of interventions. In this regard, there is recognition that all the UNDAF Outcomes stand to benefit from improved application of ICT.

UNDAF Pillar 4: Governance

UNDAF outcome: Strengthened national capacities for the promotion and protection of rightsJoint Country programme Outcomes: 1. Supportive policy and legal framework for improved governance in place2. Knowledge of rights by the people increased3. Gender equality enhanced4. Access to justice for all improvedRelated UN Declaration:o United Nations Millennium Declarationo Part V Human Rights, democracy and good governanceo Part VI Protecting the Vulnerable

28


3.1 Resource Requirements49. The United Nations estimates that approximately US$ 93,098,141 will be required to undertake the UNDAF interventions between 2011-2015, as presented in the UNDAF Results Matrix. The results matrix provides a detailed breakdown of these costs per theme and per UNDAF outcome. The Indicative Budget is distributed according to the UNDAF Outcomes as follows:

UNDAF Pillar US$I HIV and AIDS1. Risky behaviour for prevention of HIV reduced 14,141,0002. Access to comprehensive HIV treatment, care and support increased

17,195,000

3. Impact mitigation services for vulnerable children, PLHIV and the elderly scaled-up

35,600,000

4. HIV and AIDS response effectively managed at all levels 3,056,000Sub-total 69,992,000

II Poverty and Sustainable Livelihoods1. The poor’s access to productive resources increased 6,007,9222. Effective social protection systems that secure the livelihoods of vulnerable communities in place

12,843,747

3. Capacity of government and partners to address hunger and food insecurity among vulnerable groups is strengthened

16,701,819

Sub-total 35,553,488III Human Development and Basic Social Services1. Effective and efficient social services delivery (particularly in health, education, water and sanitation) in place

12,797,000

2. Basic social services to vulnerable groups, including women and children, equitably accessed

31,707,000

Sub-total 44,504,000IV Governance1. Supportive policy and legal framework for improved governance in place

2,310,750

2. Knowledge of rights by the people increased 3,550,0003. Gender equality enhanced 2,400,000

4. Access to justice for all improved 1,500,000Sub-total 9,760,750

Grand Total 159,810,238

UNDAF ResourcesSection

3

29


3.2 Resource Mobilization50. The UNCT shall be in charge of mobilising and allocating resources for the UNDAF. If there is a gap between the UNDAF indicative budget and the actual resources available to implement UNDAF commitments, the Resident Coordinator, jointly with other members of the UNCT, will supplement agency efforts in fundraising for the UNDAF. In short, all the UN Agencies will work together to mobilise resources based upon requirements identified in the UNDAF. Part of the UNDAF resource requirements will be mobilised as core funds through the different UN agencies. Some resource requirements may be met from special Trust Funds (such as the Global Environment Facility) or bilateral donor agreements. The UNCT and its partners will explore the added value and possible modalities of a UNDAF, resource mobilisation strategy.

30


4.1 Overview51. The UNDAF shall be the UN’s strategic planning and resource programming tool over the 2011-2015 period. It is noteworthy that the UNDAF is not independent of other Agency-specific planning/programming instruments and processes, such as the Country Programme Action Plans (CPAPs), Biennal and Annual Work Plans and Budgets (AWPs). In this respect, the biennal and annual budgets will be the primary instrument for implementing the UNDAF and shall clearly specify the respective roles of the different UN Agencies as either lead or supportive for each activity. The joint programming processes that will be an annual event (around November of each year) shall further define the lead agencies for specific deliverables. In this regard, there is no attempt in this UNDAF, under the Results Matrix, to specifically assign a particular output to an agency, although an indicative list of agencies that have potential interest under each output is suggested. While the UNDAF provides the overall framework and specific programmes within the context of the projected resource envelope, it is important that the Annual Work Plans for respective UN Agencies actually guide specific interventions. The AWPs will be developed based on the provisions of the UNDAF. They shall guide actual implementation, while the UNDAF will only present strategic goals, outcomes and outputs as well as indicative resource requirements. All the activities that are implemented annually will focus on the realisation of one or more of the UNDAF’s outcomes during the period 2011-2015.

52. In the context of the above, the UNDAF has identified only broad outputs for each Outcome. Each UN Agency — as guided annually by the Annual Work Plans – will be responsible for the preparation of detailed activities under those programmes.

53. All the UN Agencies in-country and outside that are part of the UNDAF shall constitute the main implementation organs. The current committees under different thematic areas shall be realigned to the targeted Outcomes and Outputs. In this respect, by internalising UNDAF implementation into the existing UN Agencies systems and structures, only a very few committees/forums will be established. It is, nevertheless, conceivable that UNCT, as it reorients its modus operandi in the light of the lessons learned from the first UNDAF, might consider the establishment of new systems that could alter the implementation structure of the UNDAF. Below are the main structures that will be at the centre of the UNDAF Implementation.

4.2 UNDAF Management Arrangements54. Oversight, operational as well as M&E arrangements, will draw from existing internal arrangements, including those established by UNCT to coordinate and manage joint programmes. The core structures, including the UNDAF management and implementation structure, are described below.

4.2.1 United Nations Country Team (UNCT)55. Under the chairmanship of the Resident Coordinator, the UNCT will bear primary responsibility for the implementation of UNDAF. It will provide overall strategic and operational guidance to the implementation and monitoring of UNDAF. Where necessary, it will also guide the strengthening of strategic partnerships with key stakeholders and mobilize additional resources for joint programmes.

The Resident Coordinator Office (RCO) will provide the Secretariat for the UNDAF work and assume the overall coordination function for UNDAF implementation.

UNDAF Management and ImplementationSection

31


2011-2015 UNDAF Management and Implementation Structure

4.2.2 Joint Programme Management and Coordination Team (JPMCT)56. JPMCT will coordinate and manage the various programmatic interventions under UNDAF, including Joint Programmes. The JPMCT will be the interface between the UNCT and the various working groups that will implement UNDAF. It will be responsible for the preparation of the UNDAF Joint Annual Work Plans as well as of the Joint Annual Reviews with government. This will be done within the spirit of Delivering as One.

United Nations Resident Coordinator

Joint Programme Management and Coordination Team

Thematic Working Group 1

HIV & AIDS


Poverty and Sustainable Livelihoods


Human Dev &Basic Social

Services


Governance

Monitoring & Evaluation Committee

United Nations Country Team

32


4.2.3 Thematic Working Groups (TWGs)57. The four TWGs will be responsible for the day to day implementation of their respective UNDAF pillars and will report to the UNCT through the JPMCT. Moreover, TWGs will prepare Joint Annual Work Plans and Budgets for UNDAF interventions.

4.2.4 Monitoring and Evaluation Committee (MEC)58. The Monitoring and Evaluation Committee will support the UNCT in enhancing system-wide coherence as well as in implementing the M&E framework of the UNDAF. M&E Sub-committees for each one of the four UNDAF Pillars will be established and will report to the M&E Committee.

33


5.1 Principles59. Effective monitoring and evaluation of the activities of the UNDAF are critical functions of delivery. Firstly, these processes will provide essential data and insights for drawing lessons, priority setting and informed review of UNDAF implementation processes. Second, they will offer the assurance that resources are used for agreed purposes.

5.2 Indicators for UNDAF Monitoring60. To enable regular and quality reporting, key performance indicators with baselines and targets have been identified for each UNDAF Outcome (see Annex 2 on UNDAF M&E Framework). These indicators will help to focus efforts and resources during the monitoring of UNDAF implementation. The monitoring reports will form a major input into the annual, mid-term and end-of-UNDAF progress reports. The following assumptions were used in selecting the key performance indicators:

(a) There exists readily available quality data on the indicator and that the data source for the indicator can be clearly identified.(b) There is capacity to collect and analyse data on a regularly basis.(c) The indicator is related to realistic performance criteria.(d) The data is relevant to users in terms of its timeliness, adequacy, relevance and accessibility.(e) Data collection processes are affordable and cost-effective.(f) It must be possible to disaggregate data on the indicator in desirable classifications.

61. UNDAF Annual Work Plans will strive to include all the existing data and, based on the availability of reliable baseline, will use these to benchmark performance. The M&E Calendar is given in Annex 3. Sufficient resources will be allocated for the monitoring function to ensure that this important task of tracking performance, including the efficacy of resource use, is adequately conducted.

5.3 UNDAF Evaluation62. There will be Joint Annual Reviews of the UNDAF, which will include the consolidation of all the quarterly and semi-annual progress reports. These reports will analyse in detail the reasons for achieving or not achieving specific UNDAF annual targets based on the key performance indicators. The Annual Progress Reports will explain, where possible, the impact of the interventions and identify areas for further investigation. They will also incorporate lessons learned from the implementation of UNDAF intervention.

63. The other report is the Mid-Term Evaluation, which will be produced after two and half years of UNDAF implementation. It will assess the progress made toward achieving the five-year outcomes and will analyse the impact of the UNDAF based on the identified performance indicators. It will consider questions of efficiency, relevance, effectiveness and sustainability of the various UNDAF interventions. There will also be the end-of-UNDAF Evaluation for assessing the overall performance of the Framework and identifying lessons learned that will inform future strategic planning and implementation processes. Overall, the three evaluations will be important elements of the UNDAF that will serve to measure the level of performance towards UNDAF targets. Ultimately, they will inform the next UNDAF programming in Swaziland at both the substance and process levels. Sufficient resources will be dedicated to UNDAF evaluations.

Monitoring and EvaluationSection

5

34


Annexes

1. UNDAF Results Matrix2. UNDAF Monitoring and Evaluation Framework3. Monitoring and Evaluation Calendar

35


An

nex

1: U

ND

AF

Res

ult

s M

atr

ix

1. H

IV a

nd A

IDS

Nat

iona

l prio

rity

or g

oals

: o

Sw

azila

nd’s

Hum

an D

evel

opm

ent I

ndex

(HD

I) im

prov

ed fr

om 0

.5 in

200

8 to

0.5

5 in

201

4 o

To

com

plet

ely

stop

any

new

infe

ctio

ns, r

ever

se th

e sp

read

of H

IV a

nd re

duce

the

vuln

erab

ility

of a

ffect

ed in

divi

dual

s an

d fa

mili

esU

ND

AF

outc

ome

To c

ontr

ibut

e to

redu

ced

new

HIV

infe

ctio

ns a

nd im

prov

ed q

ualit

y of

life

of p

erso

ns in

fect

ed a

nd a

ffect

ed b

y H

IV b

y 20

15

Join

t Cou

ntry

Pro

gram

me

Out

com

eC

ount

ry p

rogr

amm

e ou

tput

sR

oles

of p

artn

ers

Res

ourc

e m

obili

zatio

n ta

rget

s (U

S$)

Age

ncy

Com

mitm

ent

Prev

entio

n1.

1 R

isky

beh

avio

ur

for

prev

entio

n of

HIV

re

duce

d

1.1.

1 C

apac

ity o

f ins

titut

ions

and

trad

ition

al

stru

ctur

es to

equ

ip in

divi

dual

s with

co

mpr

ehen

sive

kno

wle

dge

and

skill

s for

po

sitiv

e so

cial

and

beh

avio

ural

cha

nge

impr

oved

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o T

ake

lead

ersh

ip in

HIV

pre

vent

ion

o R

esou

rce

mob

ilisa

tion

for H

IV p

reve

ntio

n

inte

rven

tions

Non

-sta

te a

ctor

s:

o S

uppo

rt G

over

nmen

t in

reso

urce

mob

ilisa

tion

and

im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e H

IV p

reve

ntio

n in

terv

entio

nsBi

late

ral a

nd m

ultil

ater

al d

evel

opm

ent p

artn

ers

o P

rovi

de fi

nanc

ial s

uppo

rt an

d te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e

UN

DP

UN

FPA

WH

O

ILO

UN

ICEF

UN

AID

S

1,00

0,00

090

0,00

01,

100,

000

3,00

0,00

01,

500,

000

600,

000

1.1.

2 C

apac

ity o

f gov

ernm

ent a

nd

non-

gove

rnm

enta

l ins

titut

ions

to in

crea

se

acce

ss to

and

util

izat

ion

of c

ompr

ehen

sive

an

d in

tegr

ated

HIV

pre

vent

ion

serv

ices

st

reng

then

ed

UN

FPA

WH

O

UN

ESC

OU

NO

DC

ILO

UN

ICEF

526,

000

335,

000

180,

000

500,

000

3,00

0,00

01,

500,

000

Trea

tmen

t, C

are

and

Supp

ort

1.2

Acc

ess t

o co

mpr

ehen

sive

HIV

tr

eatm

ent,

care

and

su

ppor

t inc

reas

ed

1.2.

1 C

apac

ity o

f the

hea

lth se

ctor

for

com

preh

ensi

ve H

IV tr

eatm

ent,

care

and

su

ppor

t ser

vice

s stre

ngth

ened

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o A

ssum

e le

ader

ship

in h

ealth

serv

ice

deliv

ery

o L

iais

e w

ith p

artn

ers i

n pl

anni

ng a

nd c

oord

inat

ing

the

HIV

trea

tmen

t, ca

re a

nd su

ppor

t int

erve

ntio

ns

Non

-sta

te a

ctor

s:

o S

uppo

rt G

over

nmen

t in

reso

urce

mob

ilisa

tion

and

im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e H

IV tr

eatm

ent,

care

and

supp

ort

in

terv

entio

nsBi

late

ral a

nd m

ulti-

late

ral d

evel

opm

ent p

artn

ers

o P

rovi

de fi

nanc

ial a

nd te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e

WH

OW

FPIL

OU

NIC

EF

763,

000

11,5

00,0

003,

000,

000

1,50

0,00

0

1.2.

2 C

apac

ity fo

r the

redu

ctio

n of

stig

ma

and

disc

rimin

atio

n in

soci

al se

rvic

es fa

cilit

ies

and

com

mun

ities

enh

ance

d

WH

OU

NIC

EF28

2,00

015

0,00

0

36


Impa

ct M

itiga

tion

1.3

Impa

ct m

itiga

tion

serv

ices

for

vuln

erab

le

child

ren,

PL

HIV

and

th

e el

derl

y sc

aled

-up

1.3.

1 In

stitu

tiona

l cap

acity

for i

ncre

ased

en

rolm

ent,

prog

ress

ion

and

rete

ntio

n of

vu

lner

able

chi

ldre

n st

reng

then

ed

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o P

lan,

lead

impl

emen

t and

mon

itor i

nter

vent

ions

o C

oord

inat

e an

d m

onito

r im

pact

miti

gatio

n in

terv

entio

nsN

on-s

tate

act

ors:

o

Sup

port

Gov

ernm

ent i

n re

sour

ce m

obili

satio

n an

d

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

impa

ct m

itiga

tion

resp

onse

Bila

tera

l and

mul

ti-la

tera

l dev

elop

men

t par

tner

s:o

Pro

vide

fina

ncia

l and

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

ILO

UN

ICEF

3,00

0,00

05,

000,

000

1.3.

2 So

cial

pro

tect

ion

syst

ems a

t nat

iona

l, re

gion

al a

nd c

omm

unity

leve

ls to

redu

ce im

pact

of H

IV/A

IDS

on h

ouse

hold

s st

reng

then

ed

ILO

FAO

UN

ICEF

WFP

300,

000

500,

000

7,00

0,00

016

,500

,000

1.3.

3 C

apac

ity o

f key

inst

itutio

ns a

t all

leve

ls

to c

reat

e an

ena

blin

g en

viro

nmen

t to

pro

mot

e an

d pr

otec

t the

righ

ts o

f vu

lner

able

gro

ups (

PLH

IV, w

omen

, ch

ildre

n an

d el

derly

) stre

ngth

ened

ILO

UN

ICEF

3,00

0,00

030

0,00

0

Resp

onse

Man

agem

ent

1.4

HIV

and

AID

S re

spon

se e

ffec

tivel

y m

anag

ed a

t all

leve

ls

1.4.

1 Pl

anni

ng a

nd c

oord

inat

ion

of th

e

mul

ti-se

ctor

al re

spon

se to

HIV

and

AID

S im

prov

ed to

incl

ude

gend

er se

nsiti

ve a

nd

hum

an ri

ghts

app

roac

hes

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o P

lan,

lead

and

mon

itor t

he n

atio

nal r

espo

nse

o C

oord

inat

e th

e na

tiona

l mul

ti-se

ctor

al re

spon

seN

on-s

tate

act

ors:

o

Sup

port

Gov

ernm

ent i

n re

sour

ce m

obili

satio

n an

d ad

vise

on

the

resp

onse

man

agem

ent

Bila

tera

l and

mul

ti-la

tera

l dev

elop

men

t par

tner

s:o

Pro

vide

fina

ncia

l and

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

UN

DP

WH

OIL

OU

NIC

EF

500,

000

382,

000

200,

000

200,

000

1.4.

2 H

IV a

nd A

IDS

M&

E sy

stem

stre

ngth

ened

UN

DP

UN

FPA

WH

OU

NES

CO

UN

ICEF

UN

AID

S

200,

000

132,

000

150,

000

60,0

0020

0,00

040

0,00

01.

4.3

Stre

ngth

ened

nat

iona

l, re

gion

al a

ndco

mm

unity

cap

aciti

es to

mob

ilise

and

ut

ilisa

tion

finan

cial

reso

urce

s for

HIV

and

A

IDS

inte

rven

tions

UN

DP

UN

FPA

UN

ICEF

300,

000

132,

000

200,

000

Coo

rdin

atio

n M

echa

nism

s and

Pro

gram

me

Mod

aliti

es:

The

man

agem

ent o

f the

HIV

and

AID

S Pi

llar o

f UN

DA

F w

ill h

ave

its o

wn

stru

ctur

e. T

he m

anag

emen

t of t

he Jo

int U

N P

rogr

amm

e on

HIV

and

AID

S in

Sw

azila

nd (J

UN

PS) s

hall,

nev

erth

eles

s, be

link

ed to

the

over

all c

oord

inat

ion

stru

ctur

es o

f the

UN

DA

F (s

ee C

hapt

er 4

for d

etai

ls)

37


2. P

over

ty a

nd S

ust

ain

able

Liv

elih

oods

Nat

iona

l prio

rity

or g

oals

: o

To re

duce

pov

erty

by

mor

e th

an 5

0% b

y 20

15 a

nd u

ltim

atel

y er

adic

ate

it by

202

2o

To c

reat

e an

env

ironm

ent t

hat w

ill e

mpo

wer

the

poor

to p

artic

ipat

e ac

tivel

y in

upl

iftin

g th

eir s

tand

ards

of l

ivin

g

UN

DA

F ou

tcom

e:

Incr

ease

d an

d m

ore

equi

tabl

e ac

cess

of t

he p

oor t

o as

sets

and

oth

er re

sour

ces

for s

usta

inab

le li

velih

oods

Join

t Cou

ntry

Pro

gram

me

Out

com

eC

ount

ry p

rogr

amm

e ou

tput

sR

oles

of p

artn

ers

Res

ourc

e m

obili

zatio

n ta

rget

s (U

S$)

Age

ncy

Com

mitm

ent

2.1

The

poo

r’s a

cces

s to

prod

uctiv

e re

sour

ces

incr

ease

d

2.1

.1M

echa

nism

s for

the

form

ulat

ion,

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d co

ordi

natio

n of

po

licie

s tha

t ens

ure

the

poor

’s a

cces

s to

and

effe

ctiv

e us

e of

pro

duct

ive

reso

urce

s dev

elop

ed

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o Po

licy

form

ulat

ion

and

mon

itorin

go

Impr

ove

pro

-poo

r bud

getin

gN

on-s

tate

act

ors:

M

obili

ze c

omm

uniti

es fo

r max

imum

par

ticip

atio

n B

ilate

ral a

nd m

ulti-

late

ral d

evel

opm

ent p

artn

ers:

o P

rovi

de fi

nanc

ial a

nd te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e

UN

DP

FAO

UN

ESC

O

1,00

0,00

079

8,19

2 19

,250

2.1.

2 G

over

nmen

t cap

acity

to e

stab

lish

dece

ntra

lised

stru

ctur

es fo

r dis

aste

rm

anag

emen

t im

prov

ed

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o Im

plem

ent f

ully

the

Dis

aste

r Man

agem

ent A

ct

o E

nhan

ce c

oord

inat

ion

of d

isas

ter-r

elat

ed is

sues

Non

-sta

te a

ctor

s:o

Con

tribu

te to

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

pla

nso

Stre

ngth

en lo

cal c

omm

unity

stru

ctur

es a

nd p

eopl

e’s

a

bilit

y to

sust

ain

livel

ihoo

dso

Mob

ilize

com

mun

ities

for m

axim

um p

artic

ipat

ion,

adv

ocac

y an

d aw

aren

ess o

f rig

hts

Bila

tera

l and

mul

ti-la

tera

l dev

elop

men

t par

tner

s:o

Pro

vide

fina

ncia

l and

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

UN

DP

WFP

UN

FPA

UN

ICEF

200,

000

500,

000

200,

000

200,

000

2.1.

3 C

apac

ity o

f key

stak

ehol

ders

for t

he

mai

nstre

amin

g of

gen

der a

nd

envi

ronm

ent i

ssue

s int

o po

verty

re

duct

ion

impr

oved

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o P

artn

er w

ith n

on-s

tate

act

ors t

o m

ains

tream

env

ironm

ent

a

nd g

ende

r iss

ues i

n na

tiona

l dev

elop

men

t int

erve

ntio

ns

UN

DP

FAO

UN

FPA

ILO

200,

000

120,

480

120,

000

250,

000

38


No-

s tat

e ac

tors

: o

Par

ticip

ate

in th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of e

nviro

nmen

t and

gen

der i

ssue

s o

Mob

ilize

com

mun

ities

for m

axim

um p

artic

ipat

ion,

adv

ocac

y an

d aw

aren

ess o

f rig

hts

Bila

tera

l and

mul

ti-la

tera

l dev

elop

men

t par

tner

s:o

Pro

vide

fina

ncia

l and

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

2.1.

4 Ev

iden

ce-b

ased

pol

icy

form

ulat

ion

enha

nced

thro

ugh

effe

ctiv

e an

d tim

ely

colle

ctio

n, p

roce

ssin

g, a

naly

sis a

nd

diss

emin

atio

n of

dis

aggr

egat

ed p

over

ty

and

gend

er-r

elat

ed d

ata

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o R

evie

w n

atio

nal s

tatis

tics p

olic

ies a

nd st

rate

gies

o

Dat

a co

llect

ion

and

diss

emin

atio

no

Con

trol t

he q

ualit

y of

dat

aN

on-s

tate

aAct

ors:

• S

impl

ify d

ata

for l

ocal

com

mun

ity st

ruct

ures

and

indi

vidu

als.

Bila

tera

l and

mul

ti-la

tera

l dev

elop

men

t par

tner

s:o

Prov

ide

finan

cial

and

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

UN

FPA

ILO

UN

ICEF

1,90

0,00

025

0,00

025

0,00

0

2.2

Eff

ectiv

e so

cial

pr

otec

tion

syst

ems t

hat

secu

re th

e liv

elih

oods

of

vuln

erab

le c

omm

uniti

es

in p

lace

2.2.

1 In

crea

sed

capa

city

of t

he G

over

nmen

t to

est

ablis

h m

echa

nism

s tha

t sup

port

inco

me

gene

ratio

n at

hou

seho

ld a

nd/o

r co

mm

unity

leve

l sup

porte

d

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o C

oord

inat

e th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of p

lans

o P

rovi

de e

ffect

ive

man

agem

ent o

f cre

dit a

nd

mic

ro-fi

nanc

ing.

n-st

ate

acto

rs:

o R

aisi

ng a

war

enes

s and

faci

litat

ing

com

mun

ity

par

ticip

atio

n in

act

iviti

eso

Cap

acity

bui

ldin

g fo

r rig

hts h

olde

rs

Bila

tera

l and

mul

ti-la

tera

l dev

elop

men

t par

tner

s:o

Pro

vide

fina

ncia

l and

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

FAO

ILO

1,50

0,00

050

0,00

0

2.2.

2C

apac

ity o

f G

over

nmen

t dep

artm

ents

an

d no

n st

ate

acto

rs to

del

iver

qua

lity

serv

ices

enh

ance

d

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o U

nder

take

a sk

ills a

udit

to d

eter

min

e th

e hu

man

reso

urce

nee

ds in

the

agric

ultu

re se

ctor

-sta

te a

ctor

s:

o C

omm

unity

mob

ilisa

tion

tow

ards

enh

ance

d ag

ricul

ture

pro

duct

ion

Bila

tera

l and

mul

ti-la

tera

l dev

elop

men

t par

tner

s:o

Pro

vide

fina

ncia

l and

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

FAO

UN

ICEF

1,12

9,51

8 30

0,00

0

39


2.2.

3K

now

ledg

e on

the

impa

ct o

f en

viro

nmen

tal d

egra

datio

n on

liv

elih

oods

of t

he p

oor i

mpr

oved

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o M

ount

adv

ocac

y ca

mpa

igns

on

the

impa

ct o

f

env

ironm

enta

l deg

rada

tion

and

clim

ate

chan

ge o

n

live

lihoo

ds-s

tate

act

ors:

o

Wor

k w

ith G

over

nmen

t on

advo

cacy

cam

paig

n

rega

rdin

g e

nviro

nmen

tal d

egra

datio

n an

d cl

imat

e

cha

nge.

UN

DP

FAO

200,

000

1,80

7,22

9

2.2.

4C

limat

e ch

ange

and

ada

ptat

ion

stra

tegy

de

velo

ped

and

ope

ratio

naliz

ed

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o R

evie

w p

olic

ies a

nd p

lans

to in

tegr

ate

clim

ate

chan

ge

v

aria

bilit

y.

-sta

te a

ctor

s:

o R

aise

aw

aren

ess a

nd fa

cilit

a co

mm

uniti

es’ r

esili

ence

an

d

a

dapt

atio

n to

clim

ate

shoc

ks B

ilate

ral a

nd m

ulti-

late

ral d

evel

opm

ent p

artn

ers:

o P

rovi

de fi

nanc

ial a

nd te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e

UN

DP

UN

FPA

FAO

WFP

2,00

0,00

025

7,00

01,

800,

000

250,

000

2.2.

5C

apac

ity o

f Gov

ernm

ent t

o de

sign

a

com

preh

ensi

ve n

atio

nal,

soci

al

prot

ectio

n fr

amew

ork

supp

orte

d

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

Faci

litat

e th

e de

velo

pmen

t of t

he n

atio

nal s

ocia

l pro

tect

ion

fram

ewor

k

UN

FPA

UN

DP

ILO

UN

ICEF

WFP

100,

000

1,50

0,00

050

0,00

050

0,00

050

0,00

0

40


Out

com

e 2.

3 C

apac

ity o

f go

vern

men

t and

pa

rtne

rs to

add

ress

hu

nger

and

food

in

secu

rity

am

ong

vuln

erab

le g

roup

s is

stre

ngth

ened

2.3.

1 C

apac

ities

of g

over

nmen

t to

form

ulat

e co

ordi

nate

s, al

ign,

and

impl

emen

t foo

d an

d nu

tritio

n pr

ogra

mm

es e

nhan

ced

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

Form

ulat

e na

tiona

l pro

gram

mes

and

stra

tegi

es, r

esou

rce

allo

catio

n an

d co

ordi

natin

g im

plem

enta

tion,

mon

itorin

g an

d ev

alua

tion.

-sta

te a

ctor

s:C

omm

unity

mob

iliza

tion

for p

artic

ipat

ion,

adv

ocac

y fo

r th

e hu

ngry

peo

ple

and

impl

emen

tatio

n of

food

secu

rity

and

nutri

tion

initi

ativ

es to

real

ize

the

right

to fo

od

FAO

WFP

150

,000

300

,000

2.3.

2

Smal

lhol

der f

arm

ers’

acce

ss to

app

ropr

iate

te

chno

logy

and

skill

s enh

ance

d fo

r im

prov

ed

food

secu

rity

and

nutri

tion

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

Res

ourc

e al

loca

tion

and

mon

itorin

g an

d se

tting

up

key

inst

itutio

ns fo

r coo

rdin

atio

n of

food

and

nut

ritio

n se

curit

y-s

tate

act

ors:

Supp

ort d

eliv

ery

of se

rvic

es w

ith fo

cus o

n vu

lner

able

gr

oups

.

FAO

WFP

UN

ESC

O

1,20

4,81

92,

017,

000

30

,000

2.3.

3

Acc

ess t

o fo

od a

nd li

velih

ood

optio

ns fo

r vu

lner

able

gro

ups e

nhan

ced

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

Coo

rdin

ate

prog

ram

mes

and

pro

vide

tech

nica

l gui

danc

e an

d fu

ndin

g.-s

tate

act

ors:

In c

olla

bora

tion

with

gov

ernm

ent a

nd lo

cal c

omm

uniti

es,

iden

tify

activ

ities

and

vul

nera

ble

pers

ons,

supe

rvis

e im

ple-

men

tatio

n an

d pr

ovid

e te

chni

cal s

uppo

rt

WFP

FAO

12,1

00,0

0020

0,00

0

2.3.

4C

apac

ity o

f ND

MA

for e

mer

genc

y pr

epar

ed-

ness

and

resp

onse

to a

cute

food

and

nut

ritio

n in

secu

rity

is st

reng

then

ed

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

Mak

ing

budg

etar

y pr

ovis

ions

, pro

vidi

ng h

uman

reso

urce

an

d co

ordi

natio

n an

d su

perv

isio

n-s

tate

act

ors:

Supp

ort d

eliv

ery

of se

rvic

es

WFP

UN

DP

500,

000

200,

000

Coo

rdin

atio

n M

echa

nism

s and

Pro

gram

me

Mod

aliti

es:

See

Cha

pter

4 a

bove

on

Impl

emen

tatio

n

41


3. H

um

an

Dev

elop

men

t an

d B

asi

c S

ocia

l S

ervi

ces

Nat

iona

l prio

rity

or g

oals

: U

nive

rsal

acc

ess

to q

ualit

y, b

asic

soc

ial s

ervi

ces

achi

eved

by

2022

UN

DA

F ou

tcom

e:

Incr

ease

d ac

cess

to, a

nd u

tiliz

atio

n of

, qua

lity

basi

c so

cial

ser

vice

s, e

spec

ially

for w

omen

, chi

ldre

n an

d di

sadv

anta

ged

grou

ps b

y 20

15

Join

t Cou

ntry

Pro

gram

me

Out

com

eC

ount

ry p

rogr

amm

e ou

tput

sR

oles

of p

artn

ers

Res

ourc

e m

obili

zatio

n ta

rget

s (U

S$)

Age

ncy

Com

mitm

ent

3.1Effectiveandefficient

soci

al se

rvic

es d

eliv

ery

(par

ticul

arly

in h

ealth

, ed

ucat

ion,

wat

er a

nd

sani

tatio

n) in

pla

ce

3.1.

1

Cap

acity

of G

over

nmen

t dep

artm

ents

to

form

ulat

e a

nd im

plem

ent

evid

ence

ba

sed

polic

ies f

or h

ealth

, edu

catio

n an

d w

ater

and

sani

tatio

n en

hanc

ed

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o C

onve

ne p

olic

y ev

alua

tion

foru

mo

Stre

ngth

en th

e Po

licy

Coo

rdin

atio

n U

nit

Nno

-s A

ctor

s:

o P

artic

ipat

e in

pol

icy

eval

uatio

no

Rai

se a

war

enes

so

Mon

itor p

olic

y im

plem

enta

tion

Bila

tera

l and

mul

ti-la

tera

l dev

elop

men

t par

tner

s:o

Pro

vide

fina

ncia

l and

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

WH

OU

ND

PU

NFP

AU

NES

CO

UN

ICEF

1,37

0,00

040

0,00

030

0,00

014

0,00

025

0,00

0

3.1.

2 C

apac

ity o

f mar

gina

lized

pop

ulat

ions

st

reng

then

ed to

con

tribu

te p

olic

y fo

rmul

atio

n, im

plem

enta

tion

and

eval

uatio

n

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o S

uppo

rt po

licy

enga

gem

ent w

ith p

erso

ns w

ith d

isab

ility

. o

Enh

anci

ng p

artic

ipat

ion

of p

erso

ns w

ith d

isab

ilitie

sN

on-s

Stat

e Ac

tors

: o

Tak

e pa

rt in

pol

icy

disc

ussi

ons

and

advo

cacy

Bi

late

ral a

nd m

ulti-

late

ral d

evel

opm

ent p

artn

ers:

o P

rovi

de fi

nanc

ial a

nd te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e

WH

OU

NFP

AU

NIC

EF

82,0

0050

0,00

010

0,00

0

3.1.

3 M

anag

emen

t and

Info

rmat

ion

Syst

ems

capa

city

of h

ealth

, edu

catio

n an

d w

ater

se

rvic

e in

stitu

tions

stre

ngth

ened

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o Im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e de

cent

ralis

atio

n po

licy

o S

uppo

rt hu

man

reso

urce

dev

elop

men

t and

inf

rast

ruct

ure

p

rovi

sion

WH

OU

ND

PU

NFP

AU

NES

CO

1,40

0,00

010

0,00

025

0,00

0 20

,000

42


Non

-sta

teAc

tors

: o

Par

ticip

ate

in th

e na

tiona

l pla

nnin

g an

d in

fluen

ce p

olic

y

form

ulat

ion

Bila

tera

l and

mul

ti-la

tera

l dev

elop

men

t par

tner

s:o

Pro

vide

fina

ncia

l and

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

3.1.

4 Q

ualit

y as

sura

nce

and

com

plia

nce

fram

ewor

k in

hea

lth e

duca

tion,

wat

er a

nd

sani

tatio

n se

ctor

s dev

elop

ed

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o P

rovi

de p

olic

y en

viro

nmen

t and

lega

l fra

mew

orks

for t

he

e

stab

lishm

ent o

f Qua

lity

Ass

uran

ce

o D

efine

min

imum

stan

dard

s for

serv

ices

N

on-s

tate

Acto

rs:

o R

aise

aw

aren

ess o

n qu

ality

stan

dard

s for

serv

ice

deliv

ery

Bila

tera

l and

mul

ti-la

tera

l dev

elop

men

t par

tner

s:o

Pro

vide

fina

ncia

l and

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

UN

FPA

UN

ESC

O

UN

ICEF

250,

000

50,0

0030

0,00

0

3.1.

5 C

apac

ity o

f the

hea

lth se

ctor

to re

spon

d to

in

crea

sing

bur

den

of c

omm

unic

able

and

ep

idem

ic d

isea

ses s

treng

then

ed

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o P

rovi

de p

olic

y en

viro

nmen

t and

lega

l fra

mew

orks

for

a

ddre

ssin

g th

e in

crea

sing

dis

ease

bur

den

o D

efine

min

imum

stan

dard

s for

serv

ices

N

on-s

Acto

rs:

o R

aise

aw

aren

ess o

n in

crea

sing

bur

den

of c

omm

unic

able

and

epi

dem

ic d

isea

ses s

treng

then

ed

Bila

tera

l and

mul

ti-la

tera

l dev

elop

men

t par

tner

s:o

Pro

vide

fina

ncia

l and

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

UN

FPA

UN

ICEF

WH

O

400,

000

250,

000

3,85

0,00

0

3.1.

6Ep

idem

ic p

repa

redn

ess a

nd re

spon

se

capa

city

of t

he H

ealth

sect

or st

reng

then

ed

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o C

omm

it to

incr

ease

d bu

dget

ary

allo

catio

n to

stre

ngth

en

su

rvei

llanc

e, p

repa

redn

ess a

nd re

spon

se fo

r effe

ctiv

e

man

agem

ent o

f em

erge

ncie

s. o

Set

asi

de c

ontin

genc

y re

sour

ce a

lloca

tion

for n

ew e

mer

ging

issu

es;

o S

treng

then

the

capa

city

of t

he M

inis

try o

f Hea

lth to

m

anag

e em

erge

ncie

s. -s

tate

Act

ors:

o

To

be e

ngag

ed in

dev

elop

men

t of r

espo

nse

plan

s for

em

erge

ncie

s to

prov

ide

inpu

ts o

n vu

lner

able

and

m

argi

naliz

ed p

opul

atio

ns.

Bila

tera

l and

mul

ti-la

tera

l dev

elop

men

t par

tner

s:o

Pro

vide

fina

ncia

l and

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

UN

ICEF

WH

O10

0,00

02,

685,

000

43


3.2

Bas

ic so

cial

serv

ices

to

vuln

erab

le g

roup

s, in

clud

ing

wom

en a

nd

child

ren,

equ

itabl

y ac

cess

ed

3.2.

1A

cces

s to

qual

ity, m

ater

nal a

nd c

hild

he

alth

and

nut

ritio

n se

rvic

es to

vu

lner

able

pop

ulat

ions

incr

ease

d

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o P

olic

y su

ppor

t and

suffi

cien

t res

ourc

e co

mm

itmen

tN

on-s

tate

Act

ors:

o

Rai

se a

war

enes

s on

impr

ovem

ent o

f qua

lity

mat

erna

l and

chi

ld h

ealth

and

nut

ritio

n se

rvic

es B

ilate

ral a

nd m

ulti-

late

ral d

evel

opm

ent p

artn

ers:

o P

rovi

de fi

nanc

ial a

nd te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e

WH

OU

NIC

EF3,

920,

000

2,50

0,00

0

3.2.

2 A

cces

s to

qual

ity b

asic

edu

catio

n to

vul

nera

ble

popu

latio

ns in

crea

sed.

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o E

nsur

e eq

uity

and

hum

an ri

ghts

-bas

ed a

ppro

ach

in th

e

pla

nnin

g of

serv

ice

deliv

ery

o A

lloca

te a

dequ

ate

reso

urce

s to

resp

onsi

ble

min

istri

es

Non

-sta

te A

ctor

s:

o R

aise

aw

aren

ess o

n av

aila

bilit

y of

serv

ices

o A

dvoc

ate

for a

dequ

ate

serv

ice

cove

rage

Bi

late

ral a

nd m

ulti-

late

ral d

evel

opm

ent p

artn

ers:

o Pr

ovid

e fin

anci

al a

nd te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e

UN

FPA

WH

OFA

OU

NIC

EFW

FP

250,

000

100,

000

40,0

00

5,00

0,00

019

,300

,000

3.2.

3 A

cces

s to

pota

ble

wat

er a

nd b

asic

sa

nita

tion

by v

ulne

rabl

e po

pula

tions

in

crea

sed

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o In

sure

equ

itabl

e ac

cess

to b

asic

sani

tatio

n th

roug

h po

licy

g

uida

nce

and

reso

urce

com

mitm

ent

Non

-sta

te A

ctor

s:

o A

dvoc

ate

for i

mpr

ovem

ents

of a

cces

s to

basi

c sa

nita

tion

b

y vu

lner

able

pop

ulat

ions

Bi

late

ral a

nd m

ulti-

late

ral d

evel

opm

ent p

artn

ers:

o P

rovi

de fi

nanc

ial a

nd te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e

UN

ESC

OW

HO

UN

ICEF

30,0

0010

0,00

01,

000,

000

3.2.

4 R

elev

ant s

take

hold

ers s

uppo

rted

to

mob

ilise

vul

nera

ble

grou

ps to

acc

ess

basi

c so

cial

serv

ices

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o S

trive

to a

ttain

equ

itabl

e an

d qu

alita

tive

impr

ovem

ents

in e

duca

tiona

l hea

lth, n

utrit

ion

and

wat

er a

nd sa

nita

tion

se

rvic

es d

eliv

ery

Non

-sta

te A

ctor

s:

o A

dvoc

ate

for i

mpr

ovem

ents

of a

cces

s to

educ

atio

n by

the

p

oor a

nd v

ulne

rabl

e, p

artic

ular

ly O

VC

and

the

disa

bled

Bi

late

ral a

nd m

ulti-

late

ral d

evel

opm

ent p

artn

ers:

o P

rovi

de fi

nanc

ial a

nd te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e

UN

FPA

UN

ESC

OW

HO

UN

ICEF

2,50

0,00

0 45

,000

200,

000

250,

000

Coo

rdin

atio

n M

echa

nism

s and

Pro

gram

me

Mod

aliti

es:

See

Cha

pter

4 a

bove

on

Impl

emen

tatio

n

44


4. G

over

nan

ce

Nat

iona

l prio

rity

or g

oals

: Im

prov

ing

gove

rnan

ce a

nd s

tren

gthe

ning

inst

itutio

nsU

ND

AF

outc

ome:

St

reng

then

ed n

atio

nal c

apac

ities

for t

he p

rom

otio

n an

d pr

otec

tion

of ri

ghts

Join

t Cou

ntry

Pro

gram

me

Out

com

eC

ount

ry p

rogr

amm

e ou

tput

sR

oles

of p

artn

ers

Res

ourc

e m

obili

zatio

n ta

rget

s (U

S$)

Age

ncy

Com

mitm

ent

4.1

Supp

ortiv

e po

licy

and

lega

l fra

mew

ork

for

impr

oved

gov

erna

nce

in

plac

e

4.1.

1 Im

plem

enta

tion

of

Con

stitu

tiona

l pro

visi

ons a

nd

enac

tmen

t of l

aws t

hat p

rom

ote

Rig

hts e

nhan

ced

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o S

treng

then

ing

of th

e ju

dici

al sy

stem

o D

evel

op a

n Im

plem

enta

tion

Plan

for a

ddre

ssin

g al

l leg

al

p

rovi

sion

s rel

atin

g to

Gov

erna

nce

Non

-sta

te A

ctor

s:

o A

dvoc

ate

for s

peed

y re

view

of l

aws a

nd im

plem

enta

tion

o

n C

onst

itutio

nal p

rovi

sion

s o

Dia

logu

e w

ith g

over

nmen

t on

st

reng

then

ing

civi

l soc

iety

eng

agem

ent

w

ith g

over

nmen

t in

the

field

of

G

over

nanc

eo

Sup

port

gove

rnm

ent i

n pr

ovid

ing

d

ecen

traliz

ed se

rvic

es

o F

acili

tate

acc

ess t

o ju

stic

e by

vul

nera

ble

g

roup

s Bi

late

ral a

nd m

ulti-

late

ral d

evel

opm

ent p

artn

ers:

o P

rovi

de fi

nanc

ial a

nd te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e

UN

DP

UN

FPA

UN

ESC

OIL

OU

NIC

EF

500,

000

200,

000

10,7

5050

0,00

020

0,00

0

4.1.

3

Cap

acity

for

publ

ic se

ctor

m

anag

emen

t enh

ance

d

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o D

evel

opm

ent o

f a C

apac

ity B

uild

ing

Prog

ram

me,

with

an

Act

ion

Plan

that

focu

ses o

n th

e G

over

nanc

e

cha

lleng

es fa

ced

by th

e co

untry

o

Pro

mot

e pr

uden

t fisc

al m

anag

emen

to

Inve

st in

impr

ovin

g hu

man

reso

urce

dev

elop

men

t in

th

e fie

ld o

f Gov

erna

nce

UN

DP

UN

OD

C30

0,00

050

,000

45


o R

evie

w c

ondi

tions

of s

ervi

ce to

enh

ance

staf

f ret

entio

n N

on-s

tate

Act

ors:

o

Adv

ocat

e fo

r pub

lic se

ctor

man

agem

ent s

ervi

ces

o S

uppo

rt go

vern

men

t in

prov

idin

g de

cent

raliz

ed se

rvic

es

Bila

tera

l and

mul

ti-la

tera

l dev

elop

men

t par

tner

s:o

Pro

vide

fina

ncia

l and

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

4.1.

4 Pa

rliam

ent s

uppo

rted

to p

erfo

rm it

sov

ersi

ght

func

tion

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o S

treng

then

the

capa

citie

s of o

vers

ight

bod

ies f

or

im

prov

ed g

over

nanc

eN

on-s

tate

Act

ors:

o

Adv

ocat

e fo

r aut

onom

y of

ove

rsig

ht b

odie

sBi

late

ral a

nd m

ulti-

late

ral d

evel

opm

ent p

artn

ers:

o P

rovi

de fi

nanc

ial a

nd te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e

UN

FPA

UN

OD

CIL

O

150,

000

150,

000

250,

000

4.2

Kno

wle

dge

of r

ight

s by

the

peop

le in

crea

sed

4.2.

1 C

ivil

soci

ety

advo

cacy

on

Hum

an R

ight

s is

sues

, par

ticul

arly

thos

e re

late

d to

wom

en

and

child

ren’

s rig

hts s

treng

then

ed

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o E

stab

lish

a co

nduc

ive

polic

y an

d le

gal e

nviro

nmen

t su

ppor

tive

of h

uman

righ

ts p

rote

ctio

nN

on-s

tate

Act

ors:

o

Stre

ngth

en C

ivil

Soci

ety

capa

city

on

civi

c ed

ucat

ion

per

tain

ing

to h

uman

righ

ts a

nd li

berti

es

o P

artic

ipat

e in

mon

itorin

g th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of h

uman

righ

ts c

omm

itmen

ts

Bila

tera

l and

mul

ti-la

tera

l dev

elop

men

t par

tner

s:o

Pro

vide

fina

ncia

l and

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

UN

DP

UN

FPA

IL

OU

NIC

EF

3,00

0,00

020

0,00

025

0,00

010

0,00

0

4.3

Gen

der

equa

lity

enha

nced

4.3.

1 Su

ppor

t tow

ards

the

enac

tmen

t and

impl

emen

tatio

n of

gen

der e

qual

ity l

aws

and

polic

ies p

rovi

ded

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o E

nsur

e th

at p

olic

ies a

nd la

ws m

ains

tream

gen

der

e

qual

ity, i

nclu

ding

the

prot

ectio

n of

vul

nera

ble

grou

ps,

p

artic

ular

ly w

omen

and

chi

ldre

no

Sys

tem

atic

ally

repo

rt on

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

c

omm

itmen

ts to

gen

der e

qual

ityN

on-s

tate

Act

ors:

o F

acili

tate

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

com

preh

ensi

ve re

spon

se

a

nd a

cces

s to

care

for s

urvi

vors

of G

BV.

Bi

late

ral a

nd m

ulti-

late

ral d

evel

opm

ent p

artn

ers:

o P

rovi

de fi

nanc

ial a

nd te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e

UN

DP

UN

FPA

ILO

1,00

0,00

030

0,00

025

0,00

0

4.3.

2 C

apac

ity st

reng

then

ing

for g

over

nmen

t de

partm

ents

and

non

-sta

te a

ctor

s to

incr

ease

the

natio

nal r

espo

nse

agai

nst

gend

er-b

ased

and

oth

er fo

rms o

f vio

lenc

e su

ppor

ted

UN

FPA

ILO

UN

ICEF

300,

000

250,

000

300,

000

46


4.4:

Acc

ess t

o ju

stic

e fo

r al

l im

prov

ed4.

4.1

Cap

aciti

es fo

r the

adm

inis

tratio

n of

just

ice

deliv

ery

syst

ems f

or a

ll en

hanc

ed

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Sw

azila

nd:

o P

rovi

de b

udge

tary

reso

urce

s for

impr

ovem

ent o

f the

Just

ice

Syst

emN

on-s

tate

Act

ors:

o

Adv

ocat

e fo

r ‘J

ustic

e fo

r All’

Bi

late

ral a

nd m

ulti-

late

ral d

evel

opm

ent p

artn

ers:

o P

rovi

de fi

nanc

ial a

nd te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e

UN

DP

UN

FPA

ILO

500,

000

200,

000

250,

000

4.4.

2 Pr

oced

ures

for c

ase

man

agem

ent,

judi

cial

tra

inin

g an

d le

gal a

id se

rvic

es fo

r the

poo

r im

prov

ed

ILO

UN

DP

25

0,00

0

3

00,0

00

Coo

rdin

atio

n M

echa

nism

s and

Pro

gram

me

Mod

aliti

es:

See

Cha

pter

4 a

bove

on

Impl

emen

tatio

n

47


An

nex

2: U

ND

AF

Mon

itor

ing

an

d E

valu

ati

on F

ram

ewor

k

UN

DA

F O

utco

mes

and

Out

puts

Indi

cato

r(s)

Mea

ns o

f ver

ifica

tion

Bas

elin

esTa

rget

sA

ssum

ptio

nsan

d R

isks

Pilla

r 1: H

IV a

nd A

IDS

Pre

vent

ion

Out

com

e1.1

Ris

ky b

ehav

iour

for p

reve

ntio

n of

HIV

redu

ced

1.1.

1 C

apac

ity o

f in

stitu

tions

and

trad

ition

al st

ruct

ures

to

equ

ip in

divi

dual

s w

ith c

ompr

ehen

sive

kn

owle

dge

and

skill

s for

po

sitiv

e so

cial

and

beha

viou

ral c

hang

e im

prov

ed

1. N

atio

nal a

ge-s

peci

fic

c

ompr

ehen

sive

HIV

pre

vent

ion

i

nfor

mat

ion

pack

age

(tool

kit)

d

evel

oped

2.

# o

f ins

titut

ions

reac

hed

with

the

too

l kit

3. #

of i

nstit

utio

ns w

ith p

erso

nnel

trai

ned

in th

e us

e of

the

tool

kit

(a)

Nat

iona

l HIV

and

AID

S

re

spon

se a

nnua

l rep

orts

(b)

Join

t Ann

ual

P

rogr

amm

e

R

evie

w (J

APR

)(c

) JU

NPS

pro

gres

s rep

orts

(d)

Beh

avio

ural

Cha

nge

Surv

ey

Ther

e is

no

tool

kit

in

plac

e

(a)

Avai

labi

lity

of

tool

kit b

y 20

11(b

) A

t lea

st 9

0% o

f

re

leva

nt

inst

itutio

ns

equi

pped

with

the

tool

kit b

y 20

15(c

) A

t lea

st 9

0

pe

rcen

t of t

he

rele

vant

in

stitu

tions

hav

e

on

e pe

rson

tra

ined

in th

e us

e

of

the

tool

kit

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Suf

ficie

nt

c

oope

ratio

n fr

om

i

nstit

utio

nso

Ade

quat

e re

sour

ce

to su

ppor

t

inte

rven

tions

Risk

s:o

Lac

k of

pol

itica

l

will

to g

ive

supp

ort

to

the

beha

viou

ral

c

hang

e in

itiat

ives

o F

ailu

re to

dev

elop

a

g

ood

tool

kit

o In

suffi

cien

t

fina

ncia

l and

hum

an re

sour

ces

1.1.

2 C

apac

ity o

f go

vern

men

t and

no

n-go

vern

men

tal

inst

itutio

ns to

incr

ease

ac

cess

to a

nd u

tiliz

atio

n of

com

preh

ensi

ve

and

inte

grat

ed H

IV

prev

entio

n se

rvic

es

stre

ngth

ened

1. #

of s

choo

ls, y

outh

cen

tres a

nd

com

mun

ities

supp

orte

d to

pro

vide

life

skill

s act

iviti

es o

n H

IV p

reve

ntio

n2.

Pro

porti

on o

f hea

lth fa

cilit

ies

with

per

sonn

el tr

aine

d to

del

iver

co

mpr

ehen

sive

HIV

pre

vent

ion

serv

ices

3. #

of i

nstit

utio

ns su

ppor

ted

with

eq

uipm

ent

prev

entio

n

pol

icie

s, st

rate

gies

, and

gui

delin

es d

evel

oped

, rev

iew

ed

and

diss

emin

ated

(a)

MO

H se

rvic

e re

ports

, (b

) N

atio

nal a

nd se

ctor

al

M&

E sy

stem

s, (c

) sp

ecia

l sur

vey,

(d)

JAPR

(e)

SDH

S(f

) M

ulti

Indi

cato

r Clu

ster

Surv

ey (M

ICS)

(a)

50.5

%

of a

ll sc

hool

s cu

rren

tly

prov

idin

g lif

e sk

ill

educ

atio

n (2

008)

(a)

90%

of s

choo

ls

pro

vide

life

skill

s by

2015

(b)

50%

of y

outh

cen

tres

prov

ide

life-

skill

ed

ucat

ion

by 2

015

(c)

At l

east

90%

of h

ealth

fa

cilit

ies h

ave

per

sonn

el tr

aine

d to

de

liver

com

preh

en-

sive

HIV

pre

vent

ion

serv

ices

48


(b)

15%

of a

ll yo

uth

cen

tres c

urre

ntly

pr

ovid

e lif

e sk

ill

educ

atio

n(c

) M

ost h

ealth

in

stitu

tions

are

po

orly

equ

ippe

d an

d su

pplie

d w

ith

the

requ

irem

ents

fo

r effe

ctiv

e H

IV

prev

entio

n(d

) Th

ere

are

wea

k H

IV a

nd A

IDS

prev

entio

n po

licie

s an

d

g

uide

lines

(d)

At l

east

50%

of

heal

th in

stitu

tions

ar

e su

ppor

ted

with

eq

uipm

ents

and

su

pplie

s for

HIV

pr

even

tion

(e)

All

due

HIV

pr

even

tion

rela

ted

polic

ies,

stra

tegi

es a

nd

guid

elin

es d

evel

oped

/re

view

ed a

nd

diss

emin

ated

by

2015

Trea

tmen

t, C

are

and

Supp

ort

Out

com

e 1.

2 A

cces

s to

com

preh

ensi

ve H

IV tr

eatm

ent,

care

and

supp

ort i

ncre

ased

1.2.

1 C

apac

ity o

f the

he

alth

sect

or fo

r co

mpr

ehen

sive

HIV

tr

eatm

ent,

care

and

su

ppor

t ser

vice

s st

reng

then

ed

1.

# of

hea

lth fa

cilit

ies

with

trai

ned

heal

th

wor

kers

on

prov

isio

n of

a

com

preh

ensi

ve c

are

pack

age

2.

Prop

ortio

n of

hea

lth

faci

litie

s with

co

mpr

ehen

sive

car

e pa

ckag

e

g

uide

lines

3.

#

of fa

cilit

ies w

ith

cap

acity

to p

rovi

de

nut

ritio

nal s

uppo

rt to

H

IV a

nd/o

r TB

pat

ient

s

(a)

Serv

ice A

vaila

bilit

y M

appi

ng (S

AM

),

Ant

i-ret

rovi

ral

Trea

tmen

t (A

RT)

prog

ram

me

repo

rts(b

) SA

M, M

ento

ring

and

Supe

rvis

ion

repo

rts(c

) SA

M, H

IV T

estin

g an

d C

ouns

ellin

g (H

TC)

prog

ram

me

repo

rt(d

) TB

/HIV

pro

gres

s

re

ports

(e)

WFP

M&

E re

port,

(a)

31%

of h

ealth

fa

cilit

ies w

ith tr

aine

d pe

rson

nel o

n A

RT

(200

8)(b

) N

o co

mpr

ehen

sive

ca

re g

uide

lines

(2

009)

(c)

30%

of p

atie

nts

ben

efitin

g fr

om

nutri

tion

supp

ort

in h

ealth

faci

litie

s (2

009)

(a)

80%

of h

ealth

fa

cilit

ies h

ave

pers

onne

l tra

ined

in

com

preh

ensi

ve c

are

pack

age

by 2

015

(b)

100%

of f

acili

ties w

ith

com

preh

ensi

ve c

are

guid

elin

es b

y 20

15(c

) 70

% o

f fac

ilitie

s with

ca

paci

ty to

pro

vide

nu

tritio

nal s

uppo

rt to

TB

and

HIV

pat

ient

s by

201

5

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Avai

labi

lity

of

fund

so

Impl

emen

tatio

n

c

apac

ity, f

unds

and

m

otiv

atio

n in

pla

ce

at th

e M

inis

try o

f he

alth

49


(f)

Hea

lth fa

cilit

y m

onth

ly re

ports

(g)

SAM

/Rou

tine

(h)

Labo

rato

ry re

ports

(d)

No

guid

elin

es

ava

ilabl

e fo

r HIV

in

tegr

atio

n in

to h

ealth

se

rvic

es.

(e)

Lim

ited

faci

litie

s with

ca

paci

ty t

o

p

rovi

de n

utrit

iona

l su

ppor

t to

TB a

nd

HIV

pat

ient

s ba

selin

e av

aila

ble

o Av

aila

bilit

y of

ade

quat

e an

d w

ell m

otiv

ated

hu

man

reso

urce

s in

the

heal

th

sect

or

Risk

s:o

Insu

ffici

ent fi

nanc

ial

and

hum

an re

sour

ces

1.2.

2 C

apac

ity fo

r th

e re

duct

ion

of

stig

ma

and

disc

rim

inat

ion

in

soci

al

serv

ices

faci

litie

s an

d co

mm

uniti

es

enha

nced

1.

Exis

tenc

e of

the

stig

ma

and

disc

rimin

atio

n

st

rate

gy a

nd g

uide

lines

2.

#

of h

ealth

wor

kers

an

d ch

iefd

oms t

rain

ed

on H

IV re

late

d st

igm

a an

d di

scrim

inat

ion

issu

es

(a)

SDH

S an

d ot

her

surv

eys

(a)

No

tool

s are

in p

lace

fo

r pro

vidi

ng sk

ills

on m

anag

emen

t and

re

duct

ion

of st

igm

a an

d di

scrim

inat

ion

(b)

Lim

ited

com

pete

ncie

s at

hea

lth fa

cilit

y an

d ch

iefd

om le

vels

on

addr

essi

ng st

igm

a is

sues

(a)

Avai

labi

lity

of st

igm

a an

d di

scrim

inat

ion

stra

tegy

and

gu

idel

ines

by

2015

(b)

All

com

mun

ity

lead

ers i

n 18

0 ch

iefd

oms t

rain

ed

on m

anag

emen

t an

d re

duct

ion

HIV

re

late

d st

igm

a an

d di

scrim

inat

ion

by

2015

(c )

At l

east

90%

of

heal

th fa

cilit

ies h

ave

wor

kers

trai

ned

on m

anag

emen

t an

d re

duct

ion

HIV

re

late

d st

igm

a an

d di

scrim

inat

ion

by

2015

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Suffi

cien

t res

ourc

es

allo

cate

d to

impa

ct

miti

gatio

n

Risk

s:o

Insu

ffici

ent fi

nanc

ial

and

hum

an re

sour

ces

50


Impa

ct M

itiga

tion

1.3

Impa

ct m

itiga

tion

serv

ices

for

vuln

erab

le c

hild

ren,

PL

HIV

and

the

elde

rly

scal

ed-u

p

1.3.

1 In

stitu

tiona

l cap

acity

fo

r in

crea

sed

enro

lmen

t, pr

ogre

ssio

n an

d re

tent

ion

of v

ulne

rabl

e ch

ildre

n st

reng

then

ed

1.

Prop

ortio

n of

scho

ols

impl

emen

ting

Scho

ols a

s C

entre

s of C

are

and

Supp

ort

(a)

UN

age

ncy

annu

al re

ports

(b)

EMIS

ann

ual

repo

rts

(a) 5

1% p

rimar

y an

d se

cond

ary

scho

ols

are

curr

ently

im

plem

entin

g Sc

hool

s as C

entre

s of

Car

e an

d Su

ppor

t

(a) A

t lea

st 9

0% o

f sch

ools

im

plem

entin

g Sc

hool

s as

Cen

tres o

f Car

e an

d Su

ppor

t by

2015

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Suffi

cien

t re

sour

ces

allo

cate

d to

im

pact

m

itiga

tion

Risk

s:o

Insu

ffici

ent

finan

cial

an

d hu

man

re

sour

ces

1.3.

2 So

cial

pro

tect

ion

syst

ems

at n

atio

nal,

regi

onal

an

d co

mm

unity

leve

ls to

re

duce

impa

ct o

f HIV

/A

IDS

on h

ouse

hold

s st

reng

then

ed

1.

# of

inst

itutio

ns c

apac

itate

d to

pro

vide

soci

al p

rote

ctio

n se

rvic

es to

vul

nera

ble

grou

ps, i

nclu

ding

chi

ldre

n an

d PL

HIV

2.

# of

com

mun

ity c

areg

iver

s tra

ined

to p

rovi

de q

ualit

y su

ppor

t to

PLH

IV a

nd o

ther

vu

lner

able

gro

ups

(a)

Surv

eys/

ev

alua

tions

(b)

Hea

lth fa

cilit

y m

onth

ly re

ports

(a)

Very

wea

k so

cial

pr

otec

tion

syst

ems a

t al

l lev

els

(b)

19,1

70 c

omm

unity

ca

regi

vers

trai

ned

in a

ddre

ssin

g th

e ne

eds o

f PL

HIV

and

vu

lner

able

chi

ldre

n

(a) 4

0 in

stitu

tions

ca

paci

tate

d to

pro

vide

so

cial

pro

tect

ion

serv

ices

(b) 4

0,00

0 (2

0,83

0 ne

w a

nd

19,1

70 re

fres

her)

ratio

of

NC

Ps a

nd o

ther

s ca

paci

tate

d w

ith sk

ills

to p

rovi

de q

ualit

y su

ppor

t to

PLH

IV a

nd

othe

r vul

nera

ble

grou

ps

1.3.

3 C

apac

ity o

f key

in

stitu

tions

at a

ll le

vels

to

cre

ate

an e

nabl

ing

envi

ronm

ent t

o pr

omot

e an

d pr

otec

t the

rig

hts

of v

ulne

rabl

e gr

oups

(P

LH

IV, w

omen

, chi

ldre

n an

d el

derl

y) st

reng

then

ed

1.

# of

inst

itutio

ns c

apac

itate

d to

pro

vide

lega

l aid

serv

ices

2.

St

atus

of a

dopt

ion

and

impl

emen

tatio

n of

key

po

licie

s and

law

s affe

ctin

g PL

HIV

and

oth

er v

ulne

rabl

e gr

oups

(a)

Han

sard

(b)

Stak

ehol

ders

an

nual

repo

rts(c

) U

N a

Age

ncy

annu

al re

ports

(a) S

ix in

stitu

tions

(tw

o ve

ry a

ctiv

e an

d fo

ur

less

act

ive)

(b) S

low

pro

cess

es

tow

ards

revi

ewin

g,

adop

tion

and

impl

emen

tatio

n of

po

licie

s and

law

s af

fect

ing

PLH

IV

and

othe

r vul

nera

ble

grou

ps

(a) A

ll si

x in

stitu

tions

(b) A

t lea

st 5

0% d

ue

to p

olic

ies a

nd la

ws

affe

ctin

g PL

HIV

an

d ot

her v

ulne

rabl

e gr

oups

adv

ocat

ed fo

r re

view

, ado

ptio

n an

d

impl

emen

tatio

n by

20

15

51


1.4

HIV

and

AID

S re

spon

se e

ffec

tivel

y m

anag

ed a

t all

leve

ls

1.4.

1 Pl

anni

ng a

nd

coor

dina

tion

of

the

mul

ti-se

ctor

al

resp

onse

to H

IV

and

AID

S im

prov

ed

to in

clud

e ge

nder

- se

nsiti

ve a

nd h

uman

-ri

ghts

app

roac

hes

1.

Exis

tenc

e of

gui

delin

es o

n co

ordi

natio

n of

the

resp

onse

2.

Leve

l of f

unct

ioni

ng o

f na

tiona

l coo

rdin

atio

n an

d te

chni

cal s

truct

ures

3.

Gen

der s

ensi

tive

civi

l

so

ciet

y an

d M

OH

pla

ns w

hich

ar

e al

igne

d to

the

NSF

and

ba

sed

on th

e hu

man

righ

ts

appr

oach

(a)

JPR

repo

rts(b

) N

ERC

HA

A

nnua

l Rep

ort

(c)

CA

NG

O

Ann

ual R

epor

t(d

) Se

ctor

repo

rts

(a)

Wea

k ca

paci

ty a

t na

tiona

l and

regi

onal

le

vels

to c

oord

inat

e th

e na

tiona

l res

pons

e(b

) N

o di

rect

ory

of c

ivil

soci

ety

orga

nisa

tions

in

the

HIV

and

AID

S fie

lds

(c)

No

clea

r alig

nmen

t of

civ

il so

ciet

y an

d M

OH

pla

ns

(a)

All

the

requ

ired

guid

elin

es o

n co

ordi

natio

n of

th

e H

IV a

nd A

IDS

natio

nal r

espo

nse

deve

lope

d by

201

5(b

) A

ll H

IV c

oord

inat

ion

stru

ctur

es in

the

four

re

gion

fully

func

tiona

l by

201

5 (a

) C

ivil

soci

ety

and

MO

H p

lans

are

gen

der

sens

itive

, alig

ned

to

the

NSF

and

bas

ed o

n th

e hu

man

righ

ts

app

roac

h by

201

5

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Res

ourc

es a

nd

effo

rts fr

om

deve

lopm

ent p

artn

ers

avai

labl

e an

d N

ERC

HA

abl

e to

pr

ovid

e le

ader

ship

in

this

are

aRi

sks:

o In

suffi

cien

t pol

itica

l w

ill

1.4.

2 H

IV a

nd A

IDS

M&

E

syst

em st

reng

then

ed

1.

Func

tiona

lity

of th

e na

tiona

l H

IV M

&E

data

base

2.

# of

trai

ned

M &

E o

ffice

rs3.

Av

aila

bilit

y an

d di

ssem

inat

ion

of in

form

atio

n pr

oduc

ts

(Beh

avio

ural

Sur

veill

ance

Su

rvey

(BSS

), Q

ualit

y of

Im

pact

Miti

gatio

n Se

rvic

es

(QIM

S), S

DH

S, (N

atio

nal

AID

S Sp

endi

ng A

sses

smen

t (N

ASA

), M

ultip

le In

dica

tor

Clu

ster

Sur

vey

(MIC

S),

(Uni

ted

Nat

ions

Gen

eral

A

ssem

bly

Spec

ial S

essi

on

(UN

GA

SS),

MD

G, s

ero

surv

eilla

nce,

(Vul

nera

bilit

y A

sses

smen

t Com

mitt

ee

(VA

C) R

epor

t, M

odes

of

Tran

smis

sion

(MO

T)

(a)

JPR

(b)

NER

CH

A

repo

rts

(c)

M&

E R

epor

t(d

) U

NG

ASS

and

M

DG

Rep

ort

(e)

JPR

(f)

Hea

lth se

ctor

pr

ogra

mm

e re

ports

(a)

Frag

men

ted

HIV

and

A

IDS

M&

E Sy

stem

at

the

natio

nal l

evel

(b)

Wea

k na

tiona

l HIV

M

&E

data

base

(c)

Wea

k ca

paci

ty fo

r di

ssem

inat

ion

of

info

rmat

ion

on H

IV

and

AID

S(d

) 17

6 tra

ined

offi

cers

(N

ERC

HA

)

(a)

One

inte

grat

ed M

&E

syst

em b

y 20

15

(b)

Stre

ngth

ened

nat

iona

l H

IV M

&E

data

base

in

plac

e by

201

5(c

) 30

0 tra

ined

M&

E

o

ffice

rs (1

76 re

fres

her

and

124

new

) in

the

area

of H

IV a

nd A

IDS

by 2

015

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Stre

ngth

ened

C

entra

l Sta

tistic

s of

fice

Risk

s:o

Insu

ffici

ent

finan

cial

and

hu

man

reso

urce

s

52


1.4.

3 St

reng

then

ed

natio

nal,

regi

onal

an

d co

mm

unity

ca

paci

ties t

o m

obili

se a

nd u

tilis

e financialresources

for

HIV

and

AID

S in

terv

entio

ns

1.

# of

the

peop

le tr

aine

d in

re

sour

ce m

obili

satio

n an

d m

anag

emen

t

(a)

NA

SA(b

) U

N

agen

cy

repo

rts(c

) Pa

rtner

re

ports

(a)

Wea

k ca

paci

ty in

re

sour

ce m

obili

satio

n an

d m

anag

emen

t

(a)

50 N

GO

s tra

ined

in

reso

urce

mob

iliza

tion

and

m

anag

emen

t by

2015

Ass

umpt

ions

:o

Cap

acity

to m

obili

se

reso

urce

Ris

ks:

o In

suffi

cien

t cap

acity

to

mob

ilise

, pla

n an

d ut

ilise

reso

urce

s

53


Pilla

r 2:

Pov

erty

and

Sus

tain

able

Liv

elih

oods

Out

com

e 2.

1 T

he p

oor’

s acc

ess t

o pr

oduc

tive

reso

urce

s inc

reas

ed

2.1.

1 M

echa

nism

s for

th

e fo

rmul

atio

n,

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d co

ordi

natio

n of

po

licie

s tha

t ens

ure

the

poor

’s a

cces

s to

and

effe

ctiv

e us

e of

pr

oduc

tive

reso

urce

s de

velo

ped

1.

# of

pro

-poo

r pol

icie

s des

igne

d in

a p

artic

ipat

ory

and

incl

usiv

e m

anne

r2.

N

umbe

r of s

ecto

rs th

at h

ave

adop

ted

a SW

APs

app

roac

h 3.

Ex

iste

nce

of c

oord

inat

ing

and

mon

itorin

g fr

amew

orks

and

to

ols

4.

Exis

tenc

e of

Nat

iona

l of a

n op

erat

iona

l M&

E Sy

stem

(a)

Nat

iona

l

su

rvey

s an

d

e

valu

atio

ns(b

) U

N

agen

cy

repo

rts

(a)

Pro-

poor

pol

icie

s ar

e no

t des

igne

d in

a

parti

cipa

tory

man

ner

(b)

SWA

ps a

ppro

ach

not

oper

atio

nal

(c)

Abs

ence

of e

ffect

ive

coor

dina

ting

and

mon

itorin

g fr

amew

orks

and

tool

s(d

) N

o na

tiona

l M&

E sy

stem

in p

lace

(a)

Prop

ortio

n of

all

pro-

poor

pol

icie

s for

mul

ated

th

roug

h a

parti

cipa

tory

an

d in

clus

ive

man

ner

(b)

SWA

ps o

pera

tiona

l by

end

of 2

015

in 1

0 se

ctor

s(c

) Ef

fect

ive

coor

dina

ting

and

mon

itorin

g fr

amew

orks

an

d to

ols i

n pl

ace

by 2

014

(d)

Nat

iona

l M&

E sy

stem

in

plac

e an

d fu

nctio

nal b

y 20

13

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Suffi

cien

t po

litic

al

com

mitm

ent t

o de

cent

ralis

atio

n

Risk

s:o

Insu

ffici

ent

polit

ical

will

to

dec

entra

lise;

to

effe

ctiv

ely

coor

dina

te

polic

ies;

and

to

mai

nstre

am

envi

ronm

enta

l is

sues

in p

over

ty

redu

ctio

n in

terv

entio

ns

2.1.

2 G

over

nmen

t ca

paci

ty to

est

ablis

h de

cent

ralis

ed

stru

ctur

es fo

r di

sast

er

man

agem

ent

impr

oved

1.

Nat

iona

l dis

aste

r man

agem

ent

stru

ctur

es d

evol

ved

to a

ll fo

ur

regi

ons

2.

# of

Nat

iona

l Dis

aste

r M

anag

emen

t Age

ncy

(ND

MA

) st

aff w

ith sk

ills i

n di

sast

er ri

sk

redu

ctio

n3.

#

of p

olic

ies a

nd p

lans

fo

rmul

ated

and

ope

ratio

nal f

or

effe

ctiv

e di

sast

er ri

sk re

duct

ion

4.

Avai

labi

lity

of m

anag

emen

t to

ols

and

proc

edur

es fo

r di

sast

er ri

sk m

anag

emen

t

(a)

ND

MA

an

nual

re

ports

(b)

UN

ag

ency

re

ports

(c)

Dep

uty

Prim

e M

inis

ter’s

a

nnua

l re

ports

(a)

Dis

aste

r Man

agem

ent

Age

ncy

in p

lace

but

ce

ntra

lised

and

und

er-

reso

urce

d,

(b)

ND

MA

has

onl

y on

e

staf

f mem

ber

(c)

Dis

aste

r Man

agem

ent

Act

is in

pla

ce b

ut n

ot

fully

impl

emen

ted

(d)

Abs

ence

of e

ffect

ive

man

agem

ent

tool

s an

d pr

oced

ures

fo

r dis

aste

r ris

k m

anag

emen

t

(a)

100%

of r

egio

ns w

ith

Dis

aste

r Man

agem

ent

repr

esen

tativ

es b

y 20

15

(b)

At l

east

15

(iden

tified

de

partm

ents

) key

ND

MA

st

aff r

ecru

ited

and

train

ed

in d

isas

ter r

isk

redu

ctio

n by

201

5(c

) D

isas

ter M

anag

emen

t A

ct, P

olic

y an

d N

atio

nal A

ctio

n Pl

an

oper

atio

nalis

ed b

y 20

15(d

) M

anag

emen

t to

ols

and

proc

edur

es fo

r dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t in

plac

e by

20

13

54


2.1.

3 C

apac

ity o

f key

st

akeh

olde

rs fo

r th

e m

ains

trea

min

g of

ge

nder

and

envi

ronm

ent i

ssue

s in

to p

over

tyre

duct

ion

impr

oved

1.

Stat

us o

f Gen

der P

olic

y2.

#

of s

take

hold

ers e

quip

ped

with

skill

s and

tool

s in

gen

der a

uditi

ng a

nd

gend

er-b

ased

bud

getin

g 3.

G

ende

r m

ains

tream

ing(

tool

s de

velo

ped

and

diss

emin

ated

4.

# of

sta

keho

lder

s eq

uipp

ed w

ith sk

ills a

nd

tool

s to

mai

nstre

am g

ende

r an

d en

viro

nmen

t int

o po

verty

redu

ctio

n

(a)

Nat

iona

l sur

vey

and

eval

uatio

ns(b

) U

N A

genc

y re

ports

(c)

Swaz

iland

En

viro

nmen

t A

utho

rity

repo

rts(d

) In

tern

atio

nal

repo

rts o

n ge

nder

and

the

envi

ronm

ent

(a)

Gen

der p

olic

y no

t in

plac

e (b

) N

o ge

nder

aud

it/N

o ge

nder

-bas

ed

budg

etin

g(c

) A

ll se

nior

G

over

nmen

t of

ficia

ls tr

aine

d in

env

ironm

ent

impa

ct a

sses

smen

t; 60

dev

elop

men

t co

mm

ittee

mem

bers

tra

ined

at i

nkun

dla

leve

l, eq

uipp

ed

on g

ende

r and

en

viro

nmen

t m

ains

tream

ing

(a)

The

Gen

der P

olic

y ap

prov

ed b

y 20

12(b

) G

ende

r aud

it un

derta

ken

by 2

013,

with

gen

der-

base

d bu

dget

ing

in p

lace

(c)

Gen

der m

ains

tream

ing

tool

s dev

elop

ed b

y 20

10(d

) A

ll re

leva

nt st

akeh

olde

rs

equi

pped

with

skill

s and

to

ols b

y 20

15 to

bet

ter

mai

nstre

am g

ende

r and

en

viro

nmen

t int

o po

verty

re

duct

ion

2.1.

4 E

vide

nce-

base

d po

licy

form

ulat

ion

enha

nced

thro

ugh

effe

ctiv

e an

d tim

ely

colle

ctio

n,

proc

essi

ng, a

naly

sis

and

diss

emin

atio

n of

dis

aggr

egat

ed

pove

rty

and

gend

er-

rela

ted

data

1.

Avai

labi

lity

of u

p-to

-da

te p

over

ty a

nd g

ende

r di

sagg

rega

ted

data

to

info

rm p

olic

y

fo

rmul

atio

n by

201

22.

Ex

iste

nce

of u

p-to

-dat

e

S

tatis

tics A

ct a

nd S

trate

gy

by 2

012

3.

# of

pol

icie

s for

mul

ated

on

the

basi

s of c

urre

nt a

nd

rele

vant

dat

a

(a)

Nat

iona

l M&

E sy

stem

(b)

Swaz

iInfo

(c)

Cen

tral s

tatis

tics,

offic

e po

verty

an

d ge

nder

-re

late

d da

taba

se(d

) D

HS

(e)

SHIE

S

(a)

Wea

k C

entra

l St

atis

tics O

ffice

(C

SO) a

s dat

a is

sc

anty

, out

date

d an

d fr

agm

ente

d - S

HIE

S (2

001)

in p

lace

(b)

Out

date

d St

atis

tics

Act

(196

7)an

d st

rate

gy u

nder

de

velo

pmen

t(c

) Li

mite

d ev

iden

ce

of c

urre

nt d

ata

use

in fo

rmul

atio

n of

po

licie

s e.g

. pov

erty

re

fere

nces

are

bas

ed

on S

HIE

S (2

001)

(a)

Stre

ngth

en C

SO

pove

rty a

nd g

ende

r-re

late

d da

ta c

olle

ctio

n,

proc

essi

ng, a

naly

sis

and

diss

emin

atio

n a

nd

feed

back

into

pol

icy

form

ulat

ion

by 2

015

(b)

Rev

iew

of S

tatis

tics A

ct

and

impl

emen

tatio

n of

st

rate

gy b

y 20

15(c

) R

esea

rch

initi

ativ

es

that

enh

ance

evi

denc

e-ba

sed

polic

y fo

rmul

atio

n in

crea

sed

sign

ifica

ntly

by

201

5

Assu

mpt

ions

: o

Suffi

cien

t co

mm

itmen

t by

Gov

ernm

ent t

o st

reng

then

ing

cent

ral s

tatis

tics

offic

eo

Evid

ence

-bas

ed

polic

ies w

ill

resu

lt in

bet

ter

prog

ram

min

g

Risk

s:o

Insu

ffici

ent

finan

cial

and

hu

man

reso

urce

s

55


Out

com

e 2.

2 E

ffec

tive

soci

al p

rote

ctio

n sy

stem

s tha

t sec

ure

the

livel

ihoo

ds o

f vul

nera

ble

com

mun

ities

in p

lace

2.2.

1 In

crea

sed

capa

city

of

the

Gov

ernm

ent

to e

stab

lish

mec

hani

sms t

hat

supp

ort i

ncom

e ge

nera

tion

at

hous

ehol

d an

d/or

co

mm

unity

leve

l su

ppor

ted

1.

Inco

me-

gene

ratio

n po

licie

s de

velo

ped

2.

# of

form

al m

echa

nism

s tha

t ta

rget

ben

efici

arie

s of c

redi

t an

d m

icro

-fina

nce

faci

litie

s (p

artic

ular

ly w

omen

and

vu

lner

able

hou

seho

lds)

3.

#

of in

form

al in

com

e ge

nera

ting

sche

mes

at

com

mun

ity l

evel

sens

itise

d on

inco

me

gene

ratin

g m

echa

nism

s

(a)

Surv

eys/

ev

alua

tions

(b)

Min

istry

of

Agr

icul

ture

re

ports

(c)

UN

age

ncy

repo

rts(d

) C

entra

l Ban

k an

nual

repo

rts(e

) M

icro

fina

ncin

g in

stitu

tions

re

ports

(f)

Min

istry

of

Fina

nce

annu

al

repo

rts

(a)

Abs

ence

of i

ncom

e ge

nera

tion

polic

ies

(b)

Lim

ited

mic

ro

finan

cing

serv

ices

(c)

Very

few

info

rmal

in

com

e ge

nera

ting

sche

mes

at

com

mun

ity l

evel

(d

) W

omen

not

em

pow

ered

to b

orro

w(e

) Li

mite

d sk

ills a

mon

g ex

tens

ion

wor

kers

re

gard

ing

mar

ketin

g an

d ag

ric b

usin

ess

mes

sage

tran

smis

sion

(f)

Wea

k re

gula

tory

and

le

gisl

ativ

e re

gim

e fo

r m

icro

fina

ncin

g

(a)

Prov

ide

at le

ast t

wo

te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e to

su

ppor

t the

dev

elop

men

t of

mic

ro fi

nanc

e m

echa

nism

s by

2012

(b)

At l

east

one

mic

ro

finan

ce a

t eac

h re

gion

by

2015

(c)

At l

east

one

info

rmal

in

com

e-ge

nera

ting

sche

me

at in

kund

la le

vel

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

A

vaila

bilit

y of

ade

quat

e fin

anci

al a

nd

hum

an re

sour

ces

Ade

quat

e m

arke

t

li

nkag

es fo

r fa

rmer

s

Risk

s:o

Adv

erse

wea

ther

co

nditi

ons m

ay

disa

dvan

tage

sm

all s

cale

fa

rmer

s

2.2.

2 C

apac

ity o

f G

over

nmen

t de

part

men

ts to

de

liver

qua

lity

serv

ices

enh

ance

d

1.

# of

trai

ning

faci

litie

s re

habi

litat

ed2.

#

of e

xten

sion

wor

kers

with

sk

ills t

o de

liver

impr

oved

ag

ricul

ture

serv

ices

(a)

Min

istry

of

Agr

icul

ture

pe

rfor

man

ce

repo

rts(b

) Pa

rliam

enta

ry

repo

rts

(a)

Ther

e ar

e si

x tra

inin

g fa

cilit

ies w

hich

are

di

lapi

date

d(b

) W

eak

exte

nsio

n de

partm

ent

(a)

Six

train

ing

faci

litie

s re

habi

litat

ed b

y 20

15(b

) Tr

aini

ng o

f 250

ex

tens

ion

wor

kers

tra

ined

by

2015

Assu

mpt

ions

:

o Po

litic

al w

ill

to im

prov

e go

vern

men

t se

rvic

es d

eliv

ery

syst

ems

Risk

s:o

Lim

ited

reso

urce

s

56


2.2.

3 K

now

ledg

e of

th

e im

pact

of

envi

ronm

enta

l de

grad

atio

n on

liv

elih

oods

of t

he

poor

impr

oved

1.

Swaz

iland

Env

ironm

ent

Aut

horit

y an

d ot

her k

ey

inst

itutio

ns w

ith c

apac

ity

to fa

cilit

ate

incl

usiv

e an

d pa

rtici

pato

ry e

nviro

nmen

t as

sess

men

ts2.

Si

mpl

ified

mes

sage

s on

the

impa

ct o

f env

ironm

enta

l de

grad

atio

n an

d cl

imat

e ch

ange

on

the

poor

’s

livel

ihoo

ds d

evel

oped

and

di

ssem

inat

ed a

t all

leve

ls

3.

Prop

ortio

n of

the

popu

latio

n w

ith a

dequ

ate

know

ledg

e on

the

link

betw

een

envi

ronm

enta

l deg

rada

tion

and

thei

r liv

elih

ood

(a)

Surv

eys/

ev

alua

tions

(b)

Swaz

iland

En

viro

nmen

tal

Aut

horit

y an

nual

repo

rts

(a)

Lim

ited

know

ledg

e di

ssem

inat

ion

with

SEA

and

ot

her i

nstit

utio

ns

and

parti

cipa

tion

of v

ulne

rabl

e gr

oups

in im

pact

as

sess

men

ts

(b)

Mes

sage

s on

the

impa

ct o

f en

viro

nmen

tal

degr

adat

ion

and

clim

ate

chan

ge

com

plex

and

ce

ntra

lised

(c)

Kno

wle

dge

of

envi

ronm

ent i

mpa

ct

does

not

tran

slat

e in

to su

stai

nabl

e liv

elih

ood

prac

tices

(a)

Sw

azila

nd

Envi

ronm

enta

l A

utho

rity

able

to

use

incl

usiv

e an

d pa

rtici

pato

ry

envi

ronm

enta

l as

sess

men

t by

2015

(b)

Tech

nica

l sss

ista

nce

prov

ided

to d

evel

op

capa

city

of S

EA

and

key

inst

itutio

ns

for t

he d

esig

n an

d di

ssem

inat

ion

of

sim

plifi

ed m

essa

ges

(c)

50%

of p

opul

atio

n ha

s kno

wle

dge

of

envi

ronm

enta

l im

pact

on

thei

r liv

elih

oods

by

2015

Assu

mpt

ions

:

o W

illin

gnes

s on

the

pa

rt of

the

com

mni

ty

to

lear

n ab

out

en

viro

nmen

tal

de

grad

atio

n an

d

clim

ate

chan

ge

Risk

s:

o In

suffi

cien

t

finan

cial

and

hum

an

re

sour

ces I

nsuf

ficie

nt

coop

erat

ion

from

com

mun

ities

2.2.

4 C

limat

e ch

ange

and

ad

apta

tion

stra

t-eg

y de

velo

ped

and

oper

atio

naliz

ed

1.

Exis

tenc

e of

Nat

iona

l C

limat

e C

hang

e Ada

ptat

ion

polic

ies,

stra

tegi

es a

nd a

ctio

n pl

ans

2.

Num

ber o

f adv

ocac

y in

itiat

ives

on

clim

ate

chan

ge

issu

es to

faci

litat

e ad

optio

n of

ada

ptat

ion

stra

tegi

es

(a)

Min

istry

of

Tour

ism

and

En

viro

nmen

t

p

erfo

rman

ce

repo

rts (M

ET

depa

rtmen

t)

(a)

No

clim

ate

chan

ge

rela

ted

polic

ies,

stra

tegi

es a

nd

actio

n pl

ans

(b)

No

advo

cacy

ca

mpa

igns

hel

d so

fa

r

(a)

Tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

to

deve

lop

and

supp

ort

the

oper

atio

nalis

atio

n of

the

Nat

iona

l A

dapt

atio

n St

rate

gy

prov

ided

by

2012

(b)

At l

east

four

adv

ocac

y in

itiat

ives

in a

ll re

gion

s pro

vide

d by

20

13

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Will

ingn

ess o

f

Gov

ernm

ent a

nd k

ey

st

akeh

olde

rs to

en

do

rse

and

impl

emen

t

polic

ies a

nd

st

rate

gies

Risk

s:o

Lack

of a

ppre

ciat

ion

of

the

impa

ct o

f

clim

ate

chan

ge o

n

livel

ihoo

ds

57


2.2.

5C

apac

ity o

fG

over

nmen

t to

desi

gn a

co

mpr

ehen

sive

na

tiona

l soc

ial

prot

ectio

n fr

amew

ork

supp

orte

d

1.

Exis

tenc

e of

nat

iona

l soc

ial

prot

ectio

n fr

amew

ork

2.

# of

staf

f of r

elev

ant

Gov

ernm

ent a

genc

ies a

nd

key

stak

ehol

ders

trai

ned

on

soci

al

pro

tect

ion

issu

es

(a)

Perf

orm

ance

re

ports

of

Dep

uty

Prim

e

M

inis

ter’s

offi

ce

(b)

UN

age

ncy

repo

rts

(a)

No

soci

al

prot

ectio

n fr

amew

ork

(b)

Ten

soci

al

wel

fare

offi

cers

ha

ve b

een

re

crui

ted

(a)

Tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

prov

ided

for t

he

deve

lopm

ent o

f soc

ial

prot

ectio

n fr

amew

ork

by

2015

(b)

90%

offi

cial

s fro

m

rele

vant

Gov

ernm

ent

agen

cies

and

key

st

akeh

olde

rs tr

aine

d on

so

cial

pro

tect

ion

issu

es

by 2

015

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Ade

quat

e fin

anci

al

and

hum

an re

sour

ces

Risk

s: I

nteg

ratio

n of

all

soci

al

prot

ectio

n in

itiat

ives

m

ight

take

tim

e

Out

com

e 2.

3 C

apac

ity o

f Gov

ernm

ent a

nd p

artn

ers t

o ad

dres

s hun

ger

and

food

inse

curi

ty a

mon

g vu

lner

able

gro

ups i

s st

reng

then

ed 2

.3.1

C

apac

ities

of

gove

rnm

ent

to fo

rmul

ate,

co

ordi

nate

, alig

n an

d im

plem

ent

food

and

nut

ritio

n pr

ogra

mm

es

enha

nced

1.

# of

food

and

nut

ritio

n pr

ogra

mm

es fo

rmul

ated

and

in

tegr

ated

into

nat

iona

l

d

evel

opm

ent p

lans

(a)

Nat

iona

l se

ctor

bud

gets

an

d ro

lling

pl

ans

(a)

Lack

of n

atio

nal

prog

ram

mes

that

ad

dres

s foo

d an

d nu

tritio

n se

curit

y

(a)

By

2015

, foo

d an

d nu

tritio

n pr

ogra

mm

es

inte

grat

ed in

to n

atio

nal

deve

lopm

ent p

lans

Risk

so

Inad

equa

te st

affin

g or

st

aff t

urno

ver

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Nat

iona

l com

mitm

ent

to p

riorit

izin

g fo

od

and

nutri

tion

secu

rity

2.3.

2Sm

allh

olde

r fa

rmer

s’ ac

cess

to

app

ropr

iate

te

chno

logy

and

sk

ills e

nhan

ced

for

impr

oved

fo

od se

curi

ty a

nd

nutr

ition

(a)

%/ #

smal

lhol

der f

arm

ers

parti

cipa

ting

in te

chno

logy

/ sk

ills t

rans

fer s

chem

es(b

) %

cha

nge

in p

rodu

ctio

n of

cr

ops,

both

by

hect

are

and

tonn

age

by ty

pe o

f cro

p (c

) %

hou

seho

lds w

ith o

ne

or m

ore

off-

farm

inco

me-

gene

ratin

g ac

tiviti

es

(a)

MoA

C(b

) Su

rvey

s(c

) M

alke

rns r

e-se

arch

s

tatio

n(d

) U

NIS

WA

/ D

epar

tmen

t of

Agr

icul

ture

(a)

70%

of r

ural

ho

useh

olds

pr

actic

e ag

ricul

ture

, w

ith m

aize

a

pred

omin

ant c

rop

(a)

By

2015

, at l

east

50%

of

smal

lhol

der f

arm

ers a

re

prac

ticin

g di

vers

ified

c

ropp

ing

(b)

By

2015

, pro

porti

on o

f ru

ral h

ouse

hold

s with

po

or fo

od c

onsu

mpt

ion

scor

e re

duce

d fr

om.1

3%

to 3

%

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Will

ingn

ess b

y fa

rmer

s to

take

up

new

idea

s and

ada

pt

to c

limat

e ch

ange

Risk

s:o

Rap

id c

limat

e ch

ange

may

affe

ct

perf

orm

ance

of

farm

ers

58


2.3

.3A

cces

s to

food

and

liv

elih

ood

optio

ns

for

vuln

erab

le

grou

ps a

re

enha

nced

thro

ugh

food

/ cas

h fo

r w

ork

sche

mes

1.

%/#

of v

ulne

rabl

e ho

useh

olds

ass

iste

d th

roug

h fo

od/c

ash

for

wor

k sc

hem

es

(a)

Nat

iona

l sur

veys

/

e

valu

atio

ns(b

) Sw

azi V

AC

(c)

Com

mun

ity

and

hous

ehol

d su

rvei

llanc

e re

ports

(a)

20%

hou

seho

lds a

re

food

inse

cure

and

re

ly o

n fr

ee fo

od

assi

stan

ce(b

) La

ck o

f sus

tain

able

m

eans

for h

ouse

hold

s to

acc

ess f

ood,

e.

g., h

ouse

hold

s co

ntin

uous

ly re

lyin

g on

free

food

aid

(a)

By

2015

, all

vuln

erab

le

hous

ehol

ds w

ith a

ble-

bodi

ed m

embe

rs a

sses

sed

to b

e in

nee

d of

food

as

sist

ance

par

ticip

ate

in fo

od/ c

ash

for w

ork

sche

mes

that

con

tribu

te

to e

nhan

ced

food

secu

rity

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Vul

nera

ble

hous

ehol

ds a

re

will

ing

to p

artic

ipat

e in

live

lihoo

d

act

iviti

es

o Pa

rtner

s are

sup

porti

ve o

f foo

d/ca

sh fo

r wor

k sc

hem

es

Risk

s:o

Not

eno

ugh

dono

r re

sour

ces a

vaila

ble

for f

ood/

cash

for

wor

k sc

hem

es

2.3.

4C

apac

ity o

f ND

MA

fo

r em

erge

ncy

prep

ared

ness

and

re

spon

se to

acu

te

food

and

nut

ri-

tion

inse

curi

ty is

st

reng

then

ed

(a)

Swaz

i VA

C h

as th

e ca

paci

ty to

pro

vide

tim

ely

info

rmat

ion

for

rapi

d re

spon

se(b

) A

nat

iona

l em

erge

ncy

pack

age

is a

vaila

ble

for

appr

opria

te a

nd ra

pid

resp

onse

(a)

Ann

ual V

AC

(b)

Rap

id a

sses

smen

t re

ports

(a)

Swaz

i VA

C se

cret

aria

t no

t yet

est

ablis

hed

(b)

Food

and

Nut

ritio

n Se

curit

y M

onito

ring

syst

ems n

ot y

et fu

lly

inco

rpor

ated

into

gov

t m

onito

ring

syst

ems

(a)

By

2015

Sw

azi V

AC

is

fully

est

ablis

hed

in

ND

MA

with

requ

isite

st

affin

g an

d go

verm

ent

budg

etar

y su

ppor

t(b

) B

y 20

15, f

ood

and

nutri

tion

secu

rity

mon

itorin

g in

corp

orat

ed

into

gov

erm

ent

mon

itorin

g sy

stem

s

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Polit

ical

com

mitm

ent

exis

ts

Risk

s:o

Inad

equa

te fi

nanc

ial

and

hum

an re

sour

ces

59


Pil

lar

3:

Hu

man

Dev

elop

men

t an

d B

asi

c S

ocia

l S

ervi

ces

Outcome3.11Effectiveandefficient,socialservicesd

elivery(particularlyinhealth

,education,waterandsanitation)inplace

3.1.

1

Cap

acity

of

Gov

ernm

ent

depa

rtm

ents

to

form

ulat

e a

nd

impl

emen

t ev

iden

ce b

ased

po

licie

s for

hea

lth,

educ

atio

n an

d w

ater

and

sa

nita

tion

enha

nced

(a)

Perc

enta

ge o

f ke

y

G

over

nmen

t pol

icy-

mak

ing

pers

onne

l tra

ined

in e

vide

nce-

base

d po

licy

form

ulat

ion

(a)

UN

Age

ncy

repo

rts(b

) A

nnua

l Joi

nt

Rev

iew

s

(a)

Lim

ited

pers

onne

l tra

ined

in

evid

ence

-bas

ed

appr

oach

es

(a)

At l

east

80%

of

rele

vant

staf

f tra

ined

by

2015

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Avai

labi

lity

of a

dequ

ate

finan

cial

supp

ort

Risk

s:o

Lack

of p

oliti

cal w

ill to

in

tera

ct w

ith n

on-s

tate

ac

tors

3.1.

2 C

apac

ity o

f m

argi

naliz

ed

popu

latio

ns

stre

ngth

ened

to

cont

ribu

te p

olic

y fo

rmul

atio

n,

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d ev

alua

tion

1.

# of

pol

icie

s tha

t hav

e re

ceiv

ed si

gnifi

cant

inpu

t fr

om m

argi

nalis

ed p

opul

atio

ns

durin

g th

eir d

evel

opm

ent

(a)

Surv

eys

(b)

Rep

orts

from

re

leva

nt m

inis

tries

(a)

Lim

ited

in-

volv

emen

t of

mar

gina

lised

p

opul

atio

ns

(a)

100%

of p

olic

ies

have

inpu

ts fr

om

mar

gina

lised

gr

oups

by

2015

3.1.

3 M

anag

emen

t an

d In

form

atio

n Sy

stem

s cap

acity

of

heal

th,

educ

atio

n an

d w

ater

serv

ice

inst

itutio

ns

stre

ngth

ened

1.

# of

serv

ice

deliv

ery

inst

itutio

ns m

eetin

g m

inim

um

man

agem

ent a

nd M

IS

requ

irem

ents

2.

Pe

rcen

tage

of s

ervi

ce d

eliv

ery

inst

itutio

ns th

at re

ceiv

ed

capa

city

stre

ngth

enin

g fo

r pr

ovis

ion

of q

ualit

y ba

sic

soci

al se

rvic

es

(a)

Gov

ernm

ent

repo

rts(b

) U

N A

genc

ies

repo

rts(c

) Jo

int A

nnua

l R

evie

ws

(a)

Lim

ited

num

ber o

f se

rvic

e de

liver

y in

stitu

tions

that

ha

ve a

chie

ved

the

min

imum

st

anda

rds

(b)

At l

east

50%

of

scho

ols o

ffer

SCC

S pa

ckag

e an

d 60

% o

f he

alth

car

e fa

cilit

ies

(a)

At l

east

50%

of

bas

ic, s

ocia

l, se

rvic

e de

liver

y in

stitu

tions

mee

t th

e re

quire

d m

inim

um st

anda

rds

(b)

At l

east

90%

of

scho

ols a

nd h

ealth

fa

cilit

ies s

uppo

rted

Ass

umpt

ions

:o

Ade

quat

e fin

anci

al

reso

urce

so

Polit

ical

will

o Av

aila

bilit

y of

effe

ctiv

e no

n-st

ate

acto

rs,

advo

catin

g fo

r equ

ity in

se

rvic

es p

rovi

sion

Risk

s:o

Lack

of a

dequ

ate

reso

urce

so

Lack

of p

oliti

cal w

ill

60


3.1

.4

Qua

lity

assu

ranc

e an

d co

mpl

ianc

e fr

amew

ork

in

heal

th, e

duca

tion,

w

ater

and

sa

nita

tion

sect

ors

deve

lope

d

1.

Exis

tenc

e of

a fr

amew

ork

for

the

Nat

iona

l Dru

gs R

egul

ator

y A

utho

rity

2.

Exis

tenc

e of

a fr

amew

ork

for

the

esta

blis

hmen

t of a

Nat

iona

l Q

ualifi

catio

ns A

utho

rity

3.

Num

ber o

f nat

iona

l qua

lity

assu

ranc

e as

sess

men

ts

supp

orte

d4.

%

of t

arge

ted

heal

th a

nd

educ

atio

nal f

acili

ties s

uppo

rted

in th

e es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f qua

lity

impr

ovem

ent s

yste

ms

(a)

Rep

orts

of

rele

vant

g

over

nmen

t m

inis

tries

(b)

UN

age

ncy

repo

rts

(a)

Qua

lity

assu

ranc

e fo

r vo

catio

nal t

rain

ing

is

bein

g de

velo

ped

(b)

No

drug

regu

lato

ry

auth

ority

(c)

Ass

essm

ents

cur

rent

ly

done

(d)

Four

inst

itutio

ns

supp

orte

d in

es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f qu

ality

impr

ovem

ent

syst

ems

(a)

Tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

prov

ided

fo

r the

dev

elop

men

t of

the

Nat

iona

l Dru

gs R

egul

ator

y fr

amew

ork

(b)

Tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

prov

ided

fo

r the

dev

elop

men

t of t

he

Nat

iona

l Qua

lifica

tions

A

utho

rity

(c)

Tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

prov

ided

fo

r at l

east

six

natio

nal q

ualit

y as

sess

men

ts in

hea

lth a

nd

educ

atio

n by

201

5(d

) A

t lea

st 5

0% o

f hea

lth a

nd

educ

atio

nal i

nstit

utio

ns

supp

orte

d in

est

ablis

hmen

t of

QI s

yste

ms b

y 20

153.

1.5

Cap

acity

of t

he

heal

th se

ctor

to

res

pond

to

incr

easi

ng b

urde

n of

com

mun

icab

le

and

non-

com

mun

icab

le

dise

ases

st

reng

then

ed

1.

Num

ber o

f pol

icy,

stra

tegy

or

guid

elin

es fo

r com

mun

icab

le

dise

ases

dev

elop

ed o

r re

view

ed2.

N

umbe

r of p

olic

y, st

rate

gy o

r gu

idel

ines

for N

CD

dev

elop

ed

or re

view

ed3.

#

key

prog

ram

me

staf

f tra

ined

in

dis

ease

con

trol p

rogr

amm

e

man

agem

ent a

nd su

perv

isio

n;4.

N

umbe

r of n

atio

nal d

isea

se

cont

rol p

rogr

amm

es e

xter

nal

revi

ew, o

r eva

luat

ion

supp

orte

d5.

#

serv

ice

deliv

ery

deliv

ery

site

s pro

vide

d w

ith e

quip

men

t et

c.

(a)

Min

istry

of

Hea

lth r

epor

ts(b

) H

MIS

repo

rts(c

) U

N a

genc

y re

ports

(d)

Ann

ual J

oint

R

evie

w R

epor

t(e

) D

isea

se

Con

trol

Prog

ram

me

repo

rts

(a)

Gui

delin

es fo

r HIV

, TB

and

Mal

aria

de

velo

ped

(b)

No

natio

nal T

B

infe

ctio

n co

ntro

l po

licy

(c)

No

natio

nal g

uide

lines

fo

rm m

anag

emen

t of

non-

com

mun

icab

le

dise

ases

(d)

Onl

y a

limite

d nu

mbe

r of

TB

and

mal

aria

pr

ogra

mm

es st

aff

train

ed in

pro

gram

me

man

agem

ent a

nd

supe

rvis

ion

(e)

No

com

preh

ensi

ve

exte

rnal

pro

gram

me

revi

ew c

ondu

cted

(a)

Gui

delin

es fo

r HIV

/TB

co

llabo

rativ

e ac

tiviti

es a

nd

MD

R-T

B re

view

ed b

y 20

13(b

) N

atio

nal T

B a

nd in

fect

ion

cont

rol p

olic

y de

velo

ped

by

2013

(c)

Nat

iona

l gui

delin

es fo

r m

anag

emen

t of n

on-

com

mun

icab

le D

isea

ses

deve

lope

d by

201

2;(d

) A

t lea

st 9

0% o

f all

rele

vant

D

isea

se C

ontro

l Pro

gram

me

Ssaf

f tra

ined

in p

rogr

amm

e m

anag

emen

t and

Sup

ervi

sion

by

201

5(e

) A

t lea

st th

ree

com

preh

ensi

ve

exte

rnal

pro

gram

me

eval

uatio

ns

supp

orte

d by

201

5

61


3.1

.6

Epi

dem

ic

prep

ared

ness

and

re

spon

se c

apac

ity

of th

e H

ealth

sect

or

stre

ngth

ened

1.

Avai

labi

lity

of e

mer

genc

y pr

epar

edne

ss a

nd re

spon

se

guid

elin

es2.

Pr

opor

tion

of h

ealth

pr

ofes

sion

als t

rain

ed in

ep

idem

ic p

repa

redn

ess a

nd

resp

onse

3.

Prop

ortio

n of

epi

dem

ic

epis

odes

that

rece

ives

tim

ely

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

and

logi

stic

al su

ppor

t fro

m th

e U

N

(a)

Min

istry

of H

ealth

(b

) H

MIS

repo

rts(c

) U

N a

genc

y re

ports

(a)

No

emer

genc

y pr

epar

edne

ss a

nd

resp

onse

gui

delin

es(b

) Pl

ans a

nd g

uide

lines

fo

r im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e In

tern

atio

nal

Hea

lth R

egul

atio

ns

(IH

R) n

ot e

stab

lishe

d(c

) In

adeq

uate

hea

lth

prof

essi

onal

s tra

ined

in e

pide

mic

pr

epar

edne

ss a

nd

resp

onse

(d)

100%

of e

pide

mic

ep

isod

es a

re c

urre

ntly

be

ing

supp

orte

d

(a)

Emer

genc

y pr

epar

edne

ss

and

resp

onse

gui

delin

es

prep

ared

by

2011

(b)

Tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

prov

ided

for

esta

blis

hmen

t of

stru

ctur

es a

nd p

lans

for

impl

emen

tatio

n of

IHR

by

201

3(c

) 80

% o

f rel

evan

t hea

lth

pers

onne

l tra

ined

in

epid

emic

pre

pare

dnes

s an

d re

spon

se b

y 20

15(d

) TA

supp

orte

d in

100

%

of e

pide

mic

epi

sode

s th

roug

hout

the

UN

DA

F pe

riod

Out

com

e 3.

2 B

asic

soci

al se

rvic

es to

vul

nera

ble

grou

ps, i

nclu

ding

wom

en a

nd c

hild

ren,

equ

itabl

y ac

cess

ed3.

2.1

Acc

ess t

o qu

ality

m

ater

nal a

nd

child

hea

lth a

nd

nutr

ition

serv

ices

to

vul

nera

ble

popu

latio

ns

incr

ease

d

1.

% d

eliv

erie

s am

ong

vuln

erab

le p

opul

atio

ns

cond

ucte

d by

skill

ed

atte

ndan

ts2.

Pr

opor

tion

of in

fant

s in

rura

l ar

eas t

hat h

ave

rece

ived

full

cour

se o

f im

mun

izat

ion

3.

# or

% o

f MC

H se

rvic

e de

liver

y si

tes s

uppo

rted

with

ess

entia

l hea

lth a

nd

nutri

tion

equ

ipm

ent ,

co

mm

oditi

es a

nd su

pplie

s4.

#

or %

of r

elev

ant h

ealth

pr

ofes

sion

als t

rain

ed in

m

ater

nal a

nd c

hild

hea

lth

and

nutri

tion

serv

ices

5.

# of

gui

delin

es a

nd st

rate

gy

docu

men

ts d

evel

oped

or

revi

ewed

(a)

Min

istry

of H

ealth

re

ports

(b)

HM

IS R

epor

ts(c

) U

N a

genc

y re

ports

(d)

Ann

ual J

oint

R

evie

w R

epor

t(e

) Sw

azila

nd D

HS

(f)

MIC

S(g

) Se

rvic

e Av

aila

bilit

y M

appi

ng (S

AM

)

(a)

MC

H se

rvic

e de

liver

y si

tes s

uppo

rted

with

es

sent

ial h

ealth

and

nu

tritio

n e

quip

men

t an

d su

pplie

s(b

) M

CH

com

mun

ity-

base

d se

rvic

e de

liver

y st

ruct

ure

supp

orte

d in

15

con

stitu

enci

es

(c)

Rel

evan

t Hea

lth

prof

essi

onal

s tra

ined

in

mat

erna

l and

chi

ld

heal

th a

nd n

utrit

ion

serv

ices

(a)

43 M

CH

serv

ice

deliv

ery

site

s sup

porte

d w

ith e

ssen

tial h

ealth

an

d nu

tritio

n e

quip

men

t an

d su

pplie

s(b

) M

CH

com

mun

ity-

base

d se

rvic

e de

liver

y st

ruct

ure

supp

orte

d in

55

con

stitu

enci

es

(c)

215

(five

per

faci

lity)

re

leva

nt H

ealth

pr

ofes

sion

als t

rain

ed

in m

ater

nal a

nd c

hild

he

alth

and

nut

ritio

n se

rvic

es

62


3.2.

2 A

cces

s to

qual

ity

basi

c ed

ucat

ion

to v

ulne

rabl

e po

pula

tions

in

crea

sed

1.

Num

ber o

r % o

f sch

ools

su

ppor

ted

with

ess

entia

l to

ols t

o pr

ovid

e qu

ality

bas

ic

educ

atio

n to

vul

nera

ble

popu

latio

ns2.

N

umbe

r or %

of s

choo

ls th

at

rece

ived

cap

acity

bui

ldin

g fo

r te

achi

ng st

aff o

n li

fesk

ills

trai

ning

(a)

Min

istry

of E

duca

tion

Prog

ress

repo

rts(b

) U

.N a

genc

y an

nual

re

ports

(a)

100

scho

ols h

ave

Scho

ols a

s Cen

tres

of C

are

and

Supp

ort

(b)

583

scho

ols h

ave

rece

ived

trai

ning

on

lifes

kills

(a)

At l

east

80%

of

rele

vant

serv

ice

deliv

ery

inst

itutio

ns

supp

orte

d by

201

5(b

) A

t lea

st 8

0% o

f sc

hool

s cap

acita

ted

by 2

015

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Ade

quat

e fin

anci

al

reso

urce

s o

Polit

ical

will

Risk

s:o

Lack

of p

oliti

cal

will

3.2.

3 A

cces

s to

pota

ble

wat

er a

nd b

asic

sa

nita

tion

by

vuln

erab

le

popu

latio

ns

incr

ease

d

1.

% o

f tar

gete

d ru

ral

popu

latio

ns p

rovi

ded

with

po

tabl

e w

ater

2.

% o

f tar

gete

d ru

ral

popu

latio

ns su

ppor

ted

with

ba

sic

sani

tatio

n in

terv

entio

ns

sche

mes

(a)

Min

istry

of N

atur

al

reso

urce

s and

ene

rgy

repo

rts

(b)

MO

H re

ports

(c)

UN

Age

ncie

s rep

orts

(d)

Ann

ual J

oint

Rev

iew

R

epor

t

(a)

56%

of r

ural

po

pula

tion

usin

g an

im

prov

ed so

urce

of

wat

er

(b)

10%

of s

choo

ls in

ru

ral a

reas

supp

orte

d w

ith sa

nita

tion

sche

me

(a)

65%

of t

arge

ted

rura

l po

pula

tion

usi

ng a

n im

prov

ed so

urce

of

wat

er(b

) 50

% o

f sch

ools

in

rura

l are

as su

ppor

ted

with

sani

tatio

n

3.2.

4 R

elev

ant

stak

ehol

ders

su

ppor

ted

to

mob

ilise

vul

nera

ble

grou

ps to

acc

ess

basi

c so

cial

serv

ices

1.

# of

stak

ehol

ders

supp

orte

d to

co

nduc

t soc

ial m

obili

zatio

n ca

mpa

igns

2.

# o

f com

mun

icat

ion

and

so

cial

mob

ilisa

tion

cam

paig

n co

nduc

ted

(a)

UN

age

ncy

repo

rts(b

) Jo

int a

nnua

l rev

iew

stak

ehol

der r

epor

ts

(a)

Eigh

t of s

take

hold

ers

curr

ently

supp

orte

d(b

) Si

x ca

mpa

igns

cu

rren

tly u

nder

take

n an

nual

ly

(a)

15 st

akeh

olde

rs

supp

orte

d by

201

2(b

) 10

soci

al

mob

ilisa

tion

and

com

mun

icat

ion

cam

paig

ns

unde

rtake

n an

nual

ly

63


Pil

lar

4:

Gov

ern

an

ce

Out

com

e 4.

1 Su

ppor

tive

polic

y an

d le

gal f

ram

ewor

k fo

r im

prov

ed g

over

nanc

e in

pla

ce4.

1.1

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

Con

stitu

tiona

l pr

ovis

ions

and

en

actm

ent o

f law

s th

at p

rom

ote

righ

ts

enha

nced

1.

# of

pie

ces o

f leg

isla

tion

oper

atio

nalis

ing

key

pr

ovis

ions

of t

he

Con

stitu

tion

supp

orte

d by

th

e U

N S

yste

m2.

#

of c

apac

ity b

uild

ing

initi

ativ

es c

ondu

cted

for t

he

Atto

rney

Gen

eral

’s O

ffice

in

law

mak

ing

(a)

Parli

amen

t rep

orts

(b)

Nat

iona

l rep

orts

(c)

UN

HC

HR

repo

rts(d

) M

inis

try o

f Jus

tice

repo

rts

(a)

Thre

e bi

lls w

ere

gaze

tted

and

four

Act

s re

view

ed in

200

8 (b

) W

eak

capa

city

of

the

Atto

rney

Gen

eral

’s

Offi

ce -

2009

(c)

Lim

ited

stak

ehol

der

enga

gem

ent i

n th

e pr

oces

ses,

lead

ing

to

the

dom

estic

atio

n of

gl

obal

and

regi

onal

in

stru

men

ts -

200

9

(a)

At l

east

two

new

bi

lls su

ppor

ted

by

2012

(b)

Supp

ort

capa

city

bu

ildin

g in

itiat

ives

un

der t

he A

ttorn

ey

Gen

eral

’s O

ffice

th

roug

hout

the

UN

DA

F pe

riod

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Stro

ng p

oliti

cal

will

to im

plem

ent

all t

he p

rovi

sion

s of

the

new

co

nstit

utio

ns,

parti

cula

rly th

ose

perta

inin

g to

fu

ndam

enta

l rig

hts

Risk

s:o

Lack

of p

oliti

cal

will

o La

ck o

f cap

acity

4.1.

2

Cap

acity

of

Gov

ernm

ent t

o ad

here

to g

loba

l an

d re

gion

al

repo

rtin

g re

quir

emen

ts o

n co

nven

tions

and

tr

eatie

s enh

ance

d

1.

# of

stak

ehol

der e

ngag

emen

t in

supp

ort o

f dom

estic

atio

n of

glo

bal a

nd re

gion

al

inst

rum

ents

(CR

C,C

EDAW

an

d U

NFC

C)

2.

# of

Gov

ernm

ent

min

istri

es a

nd c

ivil

soci

ety

orga

niza

tions

trai

ned

in st

ate

party

repo

rting

3.

# of

sign

ed in

tern

atio

nal

hum

an ri

ghts

# o

f st

ate

party

re

ports

on

impl

emen

tatio

n of

hum

an ri

ghts

inst

rum

ents

su

ppor

ted

(a)

Parli

amen

t rep

orts

(b)

Nat

iona

l rep

orts

(c)

UN

HC

HR

repo

rts(d

) M

inis

try o

f Jus

tice

and

Dep

uty

Prim

e M

inis

ter’s

Offi

ce

repo

rts

(a)

Seve

n ke

y hu

man

rig

hts i

nstru

men

ts a

re

curr

ently

aw

aitin

g ra

tifica

tion

- 200

9(b

) O

ne d

omes

ticat

ing

Act

has

bee

n en

acte

d an

d fo

ur a

re p

endi

ng -

2009

(c)

Last

CR

C re

port

subm

itted

in 2

006

(a)

At l

east

2 h

uman

rig

hts i

nstru

men

ts

ratifi

ed b

y 20

15(b

) A

t lea

st tw

o, st

ate

party

repo

rts to

tre

aty

bodi

es

subm

itted

by

2015

(c)

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

tw

o C

onve

ntio

ns

/trea

ties p

er

year

supp

orte

d th

roug

hout

the

UN

DA

F pe

riod

64


4.1.

3

Cap

acity

for

publ

ic

sect

or m

anag

emen

t en

hanc

ed

1.

# of

Gov

ernm

ent o

ffice

rs

train

ed in

inte

grity

and

pub

lic

acco

unta

bilit

y sy

stem

s2.

#

of te

chni

cal s

taff

of th

e A

nti C

orru

ptio

n C

omm

issi

on

(AC

C) t

rain

ed a

nd/o

r eq

uipp

ed in

inve

stig

atio

ns,

prev

entiv

e

m

easu

res a

nd p

rose

cutio

n of

co

rrup

tion

case

s3.

#

of p

ublic

edu

catio

n an

d aw

aren

ess-

rais

ing

cam

paig

ns

on a

nti-c

orru

ptio

n

(a)

AC

C a

nnua

l rep

orts

(b)

Prog

ram

me

repo

rts(c

) Tr

aini

ng re

ports

(d)

CSO

repo

rts(e

) Pe

riodi

c co

untry

re

ports

(f)

Tech

nica

l

a

sses

smen

ts o

n in

tegr

ity a

nd

c

apac

ity(g

) A

CC

ann

ual r

epor

ts(h

) Pr

ogra

mm

e re

ports

(i)

Trai

ning

repo

rts(j)

C

SO re

ports

(k)

Perio

dic

coun

try

repo

rts(l)

Te

chni

cal

ass

essm

ents

on

inte

grity

and

c

apac

ity

(a)

no c

orru

ptio

n ca

ses p

rose

cute

d th

us fa

r- 20

09(b

) Th

ere

are

no c

ivil

serv

ants

with

in

tegr

ity tr

aini

ng

– 20

09(c

) N

o A

nti

Cor

rupt

ion

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

ign

cond

ucte

d - 2

009

(d)

Publ

ic F

inan

ce

Man

agem

ent

Act

that

defi

nes

econ

omic

crim

e en

acte

d- 2

009

(a)

At l

east

two

case

s su

cces

sful

ly

pros

ecut

ed a

nnua

lly

by 2

015

(b)

100

civi

l ser

vant

s tra

ined

ann

ually

in

inte

grity

issu

es

durin

g th

e U

ND

AF

perio

d (c

) Tw

o an

ti-co

rrup

tion

cam

paig

ns

unde

rtake

n an

nual

ly

betw

een

2011

-201

5

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Polit

ical

will

to

impr

ove

publ

ic se

rvic

e pe

rfor

man

ceo

Exis

tenc

e of

a

p

ro-c

hang

e Pa

rliam

ent

o Ex

iste

nce

of st

rong

lo

bby

from

civ

il so

ciet

y ca

lling

for

acco

unta

ble

and

trans

pare

nt p

ublic

se

rvic

e

Risk

s:o

Lack

of p

oliti

cal

will

4.1.

4 Pa

rlia

men

t sup

port

ed

to p

erfo

rm it

s ov

ersi

ght

func

tion

1.

Exis

tenc

e of

a st

rate

gic

fram

ewor

k to

gui

de th

e w

ork

of P

arlia

men

t in

plac

e# o

f M

Ps a

nd st

aff t

rain

ed in

dr

aftin

g an

d pi

lotin

g of

bill

s2.

In

tern

ship

Res

earc

h A

ssis

tant

s Pr

ogra

mm

e fo

r Pa

rliam

ent i

n pl

ace

3.

# of

Mem

bers

of P

arlia

men

t un

ders

tand

ing

the

Parli

amen

t C

omm

ittee

syst

ems a

nd th

eir

role

s in

each

com

mitt

ee

(a)

Ann

ual r

epor

ts o

f

P

arlia

men

t(b

) U

N a

genc

ys re

ports

(c)

Mon

itorin

g re

ports

(d)

Trai

ning

repo

rts

(a)

No

stra

tegi

c fr

amew

ork

in

exis

tenc

e -

2009

(b)

No

MPs

hav

e le

gisl

ativ

e tra

inin

g (c

) N

o st

aff o

r re

liabl

e IC

T

supp

ort f

or

rese

arch

for

Parli

amen

t -20

09(d

) Li

mite

d un

ders

tand

ing

by M

Ps o

n th

eir

role

in P

arlia

men

t co

mm

ittee

(a)

Stra

tegi

c pl

an o

f Pa

rliam

ent i

n pl

ace

by 2

012

(b)

All

95 M

Ps, S

enat

ors

and

staf

f tra

ined

in

legi

slat

ive

mat

ters

by

end

of 2

013

(c)

Inte

rnsh

ip R

esea

rch

Ass

ista

nts

Prog

ram

me

oper

atio

nal a

nd 2

0 in

tern

s rec

ruite

d ea

ch y

ear b

etw

een

2011

-201

5(d

) IC

T su

ppor

t cen

tre in

pl

ace

by e

nd o

f 201

1

65


4.1.

3

Cap

acity

for

publ

ic

sect

or m

anag

emen

t en

hanc

ed

1.

# of

Gov

ernm

ent o

ffice

rs

train

ed in

inte

grity

and

pub

lic

acco

unta

bilit

y sy

stem

s2.

#

of te

chni

cal s

taff

of th

e A

nti C

orru

ptio

n C

omm

issi

on

(AC

C) t

rain

ed a

nd/o

r eq

uipp

ed in

inve

stig

atio

ns,

prev

entiv

e

m

easu

res a

nd p

rose

cutio

n of

co

rrup

tion

case

s3.

#

of p

ublic

edu

catio

n an

d aw

aren

ess-

rais

ing

cam

paig

ns

on a

nti-c

orru

ptio

n

(a)

AC

C a

nnua

l rep

orts

(b)

Prog

ram

me

repo

rts(c

) Tr

aini

ng re

ports

(d)

CSO

repo

rts(e

) Pe

riodi

c co

untry

re

ports

(f)

Tech

nica

l

a

sses

smen

ts o

n in

tegr

ity a

nd

c

apac

ity(g

) A

CC

ann

ual r

epor

ts(h

) Pr

ogra

mm

e re

ports

(i)

Trai

ning

repo

rts(j)

C

SO re

ports

(k)

Perio

dic

coun

try

repo

rts(l)

Te

chni

cal

ass

essm

ents

on

inte

grity

and

c

apac

ity

(a)

no c

orru

ptio

n ca

ses p

rose

cute

d th

us fa

r- 20

09(b

) Th

ere

are

no c

ivil

serv

ants

with

in

tegr

ity tr

aini

ng

– 20

09(c

) N

o A

nti

Cor

rupt

ion

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

ign

cond

ucte

d - 2

009

(d)

Publ

ic F

inan

ce

Man

agem

ent

Act

that

defi

nes

econ

omic

crim

e en

acte

d- 2

009

(a)

At l

east

two

case

s su

cces

sful

ly

pros

ecut

ed a

nnua

lly

by 2

015

(b)

100

civi

l ser

vant

s tra

ined

ann

ually

in

inte

grity

issu

es

durin

g th

e U

ND

AF

perio

d (c

) Tw

o an

ti-co

rrup

tion

cam

paig

ns

unde

rtake

n an

nual

ly

betw

een

2011

-201

5

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Polit

ical

will

to

impr

ove

publ

ic se

rvic

e pe

rfor

man

ceo

Exis

tenc

e of

a

p

ro-c

hang

e Pa

rliam

ent

o Ex

iste

nce

of st

rong

lo

bby

from

civ

il so

ciet

y ca

lling

for

acco

unta

ble

and

trans

pare

nt p

ublic

se

rvic

e

Risk

s:o

Lack

of p

oliti

cal

will

4.1.

4 Pa

rlia

men

t sup

port

ed

to p

erfo

rm it

s ov

ersi

ght

func

tion

1.

Exis

tenc

e of

a st

rate

gic

fram

ewor

k to

gui

de th

e w

ork

of P

arlia

men

t in

plac

e# o

f M

Ps a

nd st

aff t

rain

ed in

dr

aftin

g an

d pi

lotin

g of

bill

s2.

In

tern

ship

Res

earc

h A

ssis

tant

s Pr

ogra

mm

e fo

r Pa

rliam

ent i

n pl

ace

3.

# of

Mem

bers

of P

arlia

men

t un

ders

tand

ing

the

Parli

amen

t C

omm

ittee

syst

ems a

nd th

eir

role

s in

each

com

mitt

ee

(a)

Ann

ual r

epor

ts o

f

P

arlia

men

t(b

) U

N a

genc

ys re

ports

(c)

Mon

itorin

g re

ports

(d)

Trai

ning

repo

rts

(a)

No

stra

tegi

c fr

amew

ork

in

exis

tenc

e -

2009

(b)

No

MPs

hav

e le

gisl

ativ

e tra

inin

g (c

) N

o st

aff o

r re

liabl

e IC

T

supp

ort f

or

rese

arch

for

Parli

amen

t -20

09(d

) Li

mite

d un

ders

tand

ing

by M

Ps o

n th

eir

role

in P

arlia

men

t co

mm

ittee

(a)

Stra

tegi

c pl

an o

f Pa

rliam

ent i

n pl

ace

by 2

012

(b)

All

95 M

Ps, S

enat

ors

and

staf

f tra

ined

in

legi

slat

ive

mat

ters

by

end

of 2

013

(c)

Inte

rnsh

ip R

esea

rch

Ass

ista

nts

Prog

ram

me

oper

atio

nal a

nd 2

0 in

tern

s rec

ruite

d ea

ch y

ear b

etw

een

2011

-201

5(d

) IC

T su

ppor

t cen

tre in

pl

ace

by e

nd o

f 201

1

Out

com

e 4.

2 K

now

ledg

e of

rig

hts b

y th

e pe

ople

incr

ease

d

4.2.

1 C

ivil

soci

ety

advo

cacy

on

hum

an r

ight

s is

sues

, par

ticul

arly

th

ose

rela

ted

to

wom

en a

nd

child

ren’

s rig

hts

stre

ngth

ened

1.

# of

civ

il so

ciet

ies w

ith

tech

nica

l cap

acity

to

advo

cate

, mon

itor a

nd re

port

on h

uman

righ

ts2.

#

of H

RPA

C st

aff w

ith sk

ills

and

tool

s to

mon

itor a

nd

repo

rt on

impl

emen

tatio

n of

hu

man

righ

ts3.

C

ivil

Soci

ety

Adv

isor

y co

mm

ittee

equ

ippe

d w

ith

skill

s and

kno

wle

dge

to

addr

ess i

ssue

s of

hum

an

right

s

(a)

CSO

repo

rts(b

) Pr

ogra

mm

e re

ports

(c)

Med

ia re

ports

(d)

Ann

ual r

epor

t of t

he

HR

PAC

(e)

UN

age

ncy

annu

al

repo

rts

(a)

Wea

k ad

voca

cy,

mon

itorin

g an

d re

porti

ng

on h

uman

righ

ts b

y no

n-st

ate

acto

rs -

200

9 (b

) H

RPA

C n

ot o

pera

tiona

l an

d no

staf

f rec

ruite

d-20

09(c

) A

dvis

ory

com

mitt

ee

esta

blis

hed

in 2

009

(a)

At l

east

five

NG

Os

supp

orte

d by

201

5(b

) H

RPA

C fu

lly

oper

atio

nal

by e

nd

2011

(c)

All

mem

bers

trai

ned

in h

uman

righ

ts a

nd

advo

cacy

skill

s

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Impr

oved

ca

paci

ty o

f ci

vil s

ocie

ty

orga

nisa

tions

to

adv

ocat

e ef

fect

ivel

y on

hu

man

righ

ts

issu

esRi

sks:

o W

eak

capa

city

of

hum

an ri

ghts

gr

oups

in c

ivil

soci

ety

Out

com

e 4.

3 G

ende

r eq

ualit

y en

hanc

ed4.

3.1

Supp

ort t

owar

ds

the

enac

tmen

t and

im

plem

enta

tion

of g

ende

r eq

ualit

y

law

s and

pol

icie

s pr

ovid

ed

1.

# of

new

and

revi

sed

law

s th

at p

rom

ote

and

prot

ect

wom

en’s

and

chi

ldre

n’s

right

s 2.

#

of c

ivil

soci

ety

grou

ps w

ith

capa

city

to a

dvoc

ate

for a

nd

mon

itor t

he im

plem

enta

tion

of g

ende

r pol

icie

s

3.

# of

civ

ic e

duca

tion

and

sens

itiza

tion

cam

paig

ns

on e

lect

ions

con

duct

ed fo

r w

omen

to a

ttain

the

30%

th

resh

old

man

date

d by

C

onst

itutio

n.4.

#

of w

omen

stan

ding

for

elec

tions

at T

inku

ndla

and

B

ucop

ho le

vels

(a)

Gen

der u

nit r

epor

ts(b

) C

SO re

ports

(c)

Med

ia re

ports

(d)

Elec

tion

mon

itorin

g re

ports

(e)

Prog

ram

me

repo

rts(f

) U

NIF

EM re

ports

(g)

CED

AW(h

) C

ourt

repo

rts

(a)

Gen

der p

olic

y no

t ap

prov

ed(b

) D

raft

CED

AW R

epor

t in

plac

e - 2

008

(c)

Hum

an T

raffi

ckin

g an

d Pe

ople

Sm

uggl

ing

Act

has

be

en e

nact

ed -

2009

(d)

Sexu

al O

ffenc

es a

nd

Dom

estic

Vio

lenc

e bi

ll ha

s be

en g

azet

ted

- 200

9(e

) C

hild

ren’

s Pro

tect

ion

and

Wel

fare

bill

is a

lread

y in

C

abin

et -

2009

(a)

Com

preh

ensi

ve

repo

rt on

the

stat

e of

w

omen

in S

waz

iland

pr

oduc

ed a

nnua

lly

betw

een

2011

-201

5(b

) A

men

dmen

t of

Adm

inis

tratio

n of

Est

ates

Act

, M

arria

ge A

ct, D

eeds

R

egis

try A

ct a

nd

Ban

king

Law

revi

ew

done

by

2014

(c)

Enac

tmen

t of t

he

pend

ing

bills

by

2015

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Rec

eptiv

e po

litic

al

envi

ronm

ent

for g

ende

r ad

voca

cyo

Pres

ence

of

capa

city

o W

illin

gnes

s of

civi

l soc

iety

to

parti

cipa

te fu

lly

in e

lect

ions

66


5.

# of

inst

itutio

ns su

ppor

ted

to p

rovi

de c

ompr

ehen

sive

su

ppor

t to

surv

ivor

s of

gend

er b

ased

vio

lenc

e

(f)

Thre

e ge

nder

-rel

ated

A

cts a

re c

urre

ntly

un

der r

evie

w -

2009

(g)

Onl

y se

ven

w

omen

ele

cted

to

Parli

amen

t out

of 5

5 m

embe

rs in

200

8 el

ectio

ns –

200

8(h

) O

nly

57 w

omen

out

of

334

Buc

opho

s el

ecte

d in

200

8

(d)

At l

east

five

civ

il so

ciet

y gr

oups

em

pow

ered

to

advo

cate

for

and

mon

itor

impl

emen

tatio

n of

ge

nder

-sen

sitiv

e an

d ch

ild-f

riend

ly

polic

ies

(e)

At l

east

a 1

00%

in

crea

se in

wom

en

elec

ted

to P

arlia

men

t in

201

3

Risk

s:o

Ris

ks in

here

nt in

the

No-

Party

Tin

kund

la

syst

em o

f ele

ctio

nso

Vote

r apa

thy

will

ingn

ess o

f civ

il so

ciet

y to

par

ticip

ate

fully

in e

lect

ions

o W

eak

civi

l soc

iety

ad

voca

cy in

gen

der

issu

eso

Uns

uppo

rtive

cu

ltura

l bel

ief s

yste

m

Out

com

e 4.

4: A

cces

s to

just

ice

for

all i

mpr

oved

4.4.

1 C

apac

ities

for

the

adm

inis

trat

ion

of

just

ice

deliv

ery

syst

ems

for

all

enha

nced

1.

# of

law

enf

orce

men

t and

ju

dici

al o

ffice

rs tr

aine

d in

hum

an ri

ghts

and

ad

min

istra

tion

of ju

stic

e2.

#

of v

ulne

rabl

e gr

oups

ac

cess

ing

lega

l ser

vice

s3.

#

of n

on st

ate

acto

rs

supp

ortin

g vu

lner

able

gr

oups

to a

cces

s jus

tice

(a)

Law

repo

rts(b

) M

inis

try o

f Jus

tice

repo

rts(c

) H

igh

cour

t rep

orts

(d)

UN

age

ncy

repo

rts(e

) C

apac

ity a

sses

smen

t re

ports

(a)

Lim

ited

capa

city

of

law

enf

orce

men

t an

d ju

dici

al o

ffici

als

to d

eliv

er ju

stic

e -

2009

(a)

Thre

e tra

inin

g m

odul

es fo

r law

en

forc

emen

t offi

cers

de

velo

ped

and

im

plem

ente

d by

20

12(b

) A

t lea

st 8

0% o

f la

w e

nfor

cem

ent

and

judi

cial

offi

cers

tra

ined

in h

uman

rig

hts a

nd ju

stic

e ad

min

istra

tion

by

2012

Assu

mpt

ions

:o

Rec

eptiv

e po

litic

al

envi

ronm

ent f

or

gend

er a

dvoc

acy

Risk

s:

o N

one

67


4.4.

2 Pr

oced

ures

for

case

man

agem

ent,

judi

cial

trai

ning

and

le

gal a

id se

rvic

es fo

r th

e po

or im

prov

ed

1.

Exis

tenc

e of

dat

abas

e sy

stem

to su

ppor

t cas

e flo

w

man

agem

ent

2.

# of

nat

iona

l cou

rt pr

esid

ents

and

judi

ciar

y st

aff t

rain

ed

3.

Dra

ft fr

amew

ork

polic

y on

le

gal a

id se

rvic

es fo

r the

po

or

4.

Law

to e

nabl

e no

n-pr

actic

ing

atto

rney

s to

repr

esen

t poo

r and

vu

lner

able

clie

nts i

n co

urt

(a)

Law

repo

rts(b

) M

inis

try o

f Jus

tice

repo

rts(c

) H

igh

cour

t rep

orts

(d)

UN

age

ncy

repo

rts(e

) C

apac

ity a

sses

smen

t re

ports

(a)

No

ICT

syst

em in

pl

ace

to su

ppor

t cas

e flo

w m

anag

emen

t(b

) Fe

w la

w

enfo

rcem

ent a

nd

judi

cial

offi

cers

tra

ined

in h

uman

rig

hts a

nd ju

stic

e ad

min

istra

tion

(c)

No

train

ing

mod

ules

fo

r man

agem

ent

of c

ases

and

cou

rts

data

bas

es

(d)

No

lega

l aid

serv

ices

(a)

Dat

a ba

se sy

stem

to su

ppor

t cas

e flo

w in

pla

ce

by 2

013

(b)

All

natio

nal c

ourt

pres

iden

ts a

nd ju

dici

ary

staf

f tra

ined

in c

ase

man

agem

ent b

y 20

15(c

) D

raft

fram

ewor

k po

licy

on le

gal a

id se

rvic

es

final

ised

for a

dopt

ion

by

the

end

of 2

011

68


An

nex

3: M

on

ito

rin

g a

nd

Eva

luat

ion

(M

&E

) C

alen

dar

Yea

rQ

uar

ter

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

41

23

41

23

41

23

41

23

41

23

4

I. M

on

ito

rin

g A

ctiv

itie

s1.

Cont

inuo

us a

ctiv

itie

s m

onit

ori

ng (

wit

h qu

arte

rly P

rogr

ess

Rep

orts

to

UN

CT

)

2.M

eeti

ng o

f T

hem

atic

Wor

king

Gro

ups

(Mont

hly)

3.M

eeti

ngs

of

the

M&

E S

ub-C

om

mit

tees

for

each

UN

DA

F P

illa

r (Q

uart

erly

: M

arch

, Jun

e,

Sep

tem

ber,

Dec

embe

r)4.

Mee

ting

s of

the

Mon

itor

ing

and E

valu

atio

n C

omm

itte

e (Q

uart

erly

: M

arch

, Jun

e, S

epte

mbe

r,

Dec

embe

r)

II. E

valu

atio

ns

5.Jo

int A

nnua

l P

rogr

ess

Rep

orts

of

UN

DA

F P

illa

rs –

Nov

embe

r

6.M

id-T

erm

Eval

uati

on o

f th

e S

waz

i U

ND

AF

(ex

tern

al)

7.E

nd-o

f-C

ycle

Eva

luat

ion

of U

ND

AF

(ex

tern

al)

III. R

evie

ws

8.Jo

int A

nnua

l R

evie

ws

of U

ND

AF

(al

l U

N A

gen

cies

and

mai

nst

akeh

olde

rs)

–N

ovem

ber

9.M

eeti

ngs

of

Join

t P

rogr

amm

e M

anag

emen

t an

d C

oord

inat

ion

Tea

m t

o re

view

pro

gres

s (Q

uart

erly

: M

arch

, June

, Sep

tem

ber,

Dec

embe

r)10

.R

evie

w m

eeti

ng o

f T

hem

atic

Work

ing

Gro

ups

(Ann

uall

y: S

epte

mbe

r ye

ar)

IV. P

lan

nin

g P

roce

sses

11.

Ann

ual

Work

Pla

ns a

nd

Bud

gets

(A

WP

Bs)

-ap

prov

ed a

t en

d of

yea

r fo

r th

e fo

llo

win

g ye

ar

12.

For

mat

ion

of T

hem

atic

Wor

king

Gro

ups

(for

each

UN

DA

F P

illa

r)

13.

For

mat

ion

of U

ND

AF

Mon

itori

ng

and

Eva

luat

ion

Co

mm

itte

e (U

ME

C)

14.

For

mat

ion

of M

&E

Sub

-Com

mit

tees

for

each

UN

DA

F P

illa

r (a

nsw

erab

le t

o U

ME

C)

15.

Pre

para

tion

and

appr

oval

of

ToR

for

Mid

-ter

m E

valu

atio

n (M

TR

) of

UN

DA

F

16.

App

oint

men

t of

ext

erna

l co

nsult

ant(

s) f

or

the

MT

R

17.

Pre

para

tion

and

appr

oval

of

ToR

for

End

-of-

Cyc

le E

valu

atio

n of

UN

DA

F18

.A

ppoi

ntm

ent

of e

xter

nal

cons

ult

ant(

s) f

or

End

-of-

Cyc

le E

valu

atio

n of

UN

DA

F

Documents

© UNCT, Swaziland UNDAF: 2011-2015 - Home page | UNICEF · 2015-06-02 · 4 © UNCT, Swaziland UNDAF: 2011-2015 We, the United Nations Country Team in Swaziland, while respecting