Upload
ngokiet
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
US Rt. 12/20/45 at US Rt. 20
<Westbound and Southbound>
Village of Stone Park, I l l inois
R L R F o l l o w - U p E v a l u a t i o n R e p o r t
Reference No: 016-43280
December 2010
Reference No: 016-43280 US Rt . 12/20/45 (Mannheim Rd) at US Rt . 20 (Lake St)
Table of Contents
I. RLR Camera Location, Implementation Date, System Manufacturer and Contractors
II. RLR Crash Data and Analysis
III. Traffic Volume
IV. Summary of Adjudication
V. Summary
Reference No: 016-43280 US Rt . 12/20/45 (Mannheim Rd) at US Rt . 20 (Lake St)
I. RLR Camera Location,
Implementation Date, System Manufacturer and
Contractors
Reference No: 016-43280 US Rt . 12/20/45 (Mannheim Rd) at US Rt . 20 (Lake St)
The Village of Stone Park received approval from IDOT to install a RLR camera on Westbound and Southbound US RT. 12/20/45 (Mannheim Rd) at the intersection of US RT 20 (Lake St).
Date of RLR camera implementation on Westbound Lake St at Mannheim Rd: 6/4/2009
Date of RLR camera implementation on Southbound Mannheim Rd at Lake St: 9/25/2009
Signal timing and other settings stayed the same before and after RLR Camera installation
RLR Camera System Manufacturer
SafeSpeed, LLC, 150 North Wacker Drive 8th Floor Chicago, IL 60606 Phone: (877) 237-2331 Fax: (877) 237-2302 Email: [email protected] Web: safespeedllc.com FEIN: 26-0416154 Key Contacts: Mr. Ryan Kim Phone: (312) 924-7248 Email: [email protected]
Traffic Signal Design Consultant
Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 9575 West Higgins Road Suite 600 Rosemont, IL 60018 Phone: (847) 823-0500 Fax: (847) 823-0520 Email: [email protected] Web: cbbel.com Key Contacts: Mr. Mike Ziegler Phone: (847) 823-0500 Email: [email protected]
Reference No: 016-43280 US Rt . 12/20/45 (Mannheim Rd) at US Rt . 20 (Lake St)
Electrical Contractor
Meade Electric Company 9550 West 55 Street McCook, IL 60525 Phone: (708) 588-2500 Fax: (708) 588-2501 Email: [email protected] Web: meadeelectric.com Key Contacts: Mr. Michael Knutson Phone: (708) 588-2500 Email: [email protected]
Reference No: 016-43280 US Rt . 12/20/45 (Mannheim Rd) at US Rt . 20 (Lake St)
II. RLR Crash Data and Analysis
Reference No: 016-43280 US Rt . 12/20/45 (Mannheim Rd) at US Rt . 20 (Lake St)
The table and chart below show the summary of Crash data at the intersection of Lake St and Mannheim Rd including 3 years (2006 – 2008) prior to RLR camera installation as well as one year post period crash data (2009).
US Rt. 12/20/45 & US Rt. 20 (Stone Park)
Head On Angle
Rear End
Other Object
Pedal cyclist Pedestrian
Sideswipe Same direction
Parked Motor Vehicle Turning Total
2006 0 2 13 0 2 0 4 0 8 29
2007 0 3 20 1 0 0 6 1 13 44
2008 0 1 23 0 0 0 6 1 2 33
2009 0 2 15 0 0 0 1 0 0 18
The results showed Total accidents were dropped by 45.45% from year 2008 to year 2009.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
US Rt. 12/20/45 & US Rt. 20 (Stone Park)
2006
2007
2008
2009
Reference No: 016-43280 US Rt . 12/20/45 (Mannheim Rd) at US Rt . 20 (Lake St)
The table and chart below indicate precise statistics immediately before the RLR Camera at Westbound Lake St at Mannheim Rd was implemented on June 4, 2009, and one year after installation. Please remember that the second camera on the southbound Mannheim Rd was implemented on September 25, 2009
US Rt. 12/20/45 & US Rt. 20 (Stone Park)
Angle Turning Rear End Others Total
2008 (6/4 - 12/31) 1 0 13 4 18
2009 (6/4 - 12/31) 1 0 12 0 13
The results showed that the number of Total accidents was decreased from 18 in 2008 (June 4th to December 31st) to 13 in 2009 (June 4th to December 31st). Total accidents were reduced by 27.78% at this intersection. In following pages, you will find the crash data from 2006 to 2009 that we acquired from IDOT itself.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Angle Turning Rear End Others Total
Series1
Series2
Reference No: 016-43280 US Rt . 12/20/45 (Mannheim Rd) at US Rt . 20 (Lake St)
September 2008 This information was obtained via the Illinois Department of Transportation website per the RLR Guideline document published by IDOT. Only ADT values were available, peak numbers were not provided. US Route 12/20/45 ADT
North of US Route 20 is 39,800
South of US Route 20 is 38,900
US Route 20 ADT
East of Route 12/20/45 is 21,000
West of Route 12/20/45 is 22,500
Reference No: 016-43280 US Rt . 12/20/45 (Mannheim Rd) at US Rt . 20 (Lake St)
December 2010 This information was obtained via the Illinois Department of Transportation website per the RLR Guideline document published by IDOT. Only ADT values were available, peak numbers were not provided. US Route 12/20/45 ADT
North of US Route 20 is 39,500
South of US Route 20 is 36,000
US Route 20 ADT
East of Route 12/20/45 is 21,000
West of Route 12/20/45 is 26,600 ( +4000 )
Reference No: 016-43280 US Rt . 12/20/45 (Mannheim Rd) at US Rt . 20 (Lake St)
IV. Summary of Adjudication
Reference No: 016-43280 US Rt . 12/20/45 (Mannheim Rd) at US Rt . 20 (Lake St)
Below are the summaries of contested tickets in person and by mail at the Westbound Lake St and Mannheim Rd during one year period from July ’09 to June ’10. In court contest
Date Total Ticket in Court Dismissed Found Guilty Dismiss ratio
Jul-09 2 0 2 0.00%
Aug-09 18 3 15 16.67%
Sep-09 0 0 0 n/a
Oct-09 0 0 0 n/a
Nov-09 24 1 23 4.17%
Dec-09 27 11 16 40.74%
Jan-10 27 10 17 37.04%
Feb-10 34 13 21 38.24%
Mar-10 18 4 14 22.22%
Apr-10 5 1 4 20.00%
May-10 25 1 24 4.00%
Jun-10 13 0 13 0.00%
Total 193 44 149 22.80%
As you can see from the table above, there were 193 contested tickets that the court had to review during this period. The court dismissed 44 of them showing 22.80% dismissal rate in total. By Mail Contest
Date Total Ticket Dismissed Found Guilty Dismiss Ratio
Jul-09 37 5 32 Aug-09 10 2 8 Sep-09 0 0 0 Oct-09 0 0 0 Nov-09 25 0 25 Dec-09 9 0 9 Jan-10 26 0 26 Feb-10 25 0 25 Mar-10 25 0 25 Apr-10 14 0 14 May-10 15 0 15 Jun-10 14 0 14 Total 200 7 193 3.50%
Reference No: 016-43280 US Rt . 12/20/45 (Mannheim Rd) at US Rt . 20 (Lake St)
Below are the summaries of contested tickets in person and by mail at the Southbound Mannheim Rd and Lake Ave during one year period from November ’09 to September ’10. In court contest
Date Total Ticket in Court Dismissed Found Guilty Dismiss Ratio
Nov-09 9 5 4 55.56%
Dec-09 34 17 17 50.00%
Jan-10 18 2 16 11.11%
Feb-10 16 5 11 31.25%
Mar-10 6 2 4 33.33%
Apr-10 29 8 21 27.59%
May-10 24 7 17 29.17%
Jun-10 20 6 14 30.00%
Jul-10 12 3 9 25.00%
Aug-10 11 5 6 45.45%
Sep-10 15 0 15 0.00%
Total 194 60 134 30.93%
As you can see from the table above, there were 194 contested tickets that the court had to review during this period. The court dismissed 60 of them showing 30.93% dismissal rate in total. By Mail Contest
Date Total Ticket Dismissed Found Guilty Dismiss Ratio
Nov-09 13 0 13 Dec-09 6 0 6 Jan-10 16 0 16 Feb-10 10 0 10 Mar-10 4 0 4 Apr-10 15 0 15 May-10 27 0 27 Jun-10 35 0 35 Jul-10 25 0 25 Aug-10 8 0 8 Sep-10 7 0 7 Total 166 0 166 0.00%
Reference No: 016-43280 US Rt . 12/20/45 (Mannheim Rd) at US Rt . 20 (Lake St)
In 2007 almost 900 people were killed and an estimated 153,000 were injured in
crashes that involved red light running in the US. About half of the deaths in red light running crashes are pedestrians and occupants in other vehicles who are hit by red light runners. Studies have reported that red light cameras reduce angle and turning crashes. Because the types of crashes prevented by red light cameras tend to be more severe than rear-end crashes, research has shown there is also a reduction in the severity of crashes.
The Village of Stone Park’s Red Light Camera Enforcement Safety Program uses state-of-the-art digital camera and detection systems, provided by SafeSpeed, LLC, installed at some of the City’s most dangerous intersections for the purpose of decreasing the number of red light runners and reducing collisions.
The Village of Stone Park received approval to install RLR cameras on US Rt. 12/20/45 (Mannheim Rd) at the intersection of US Rt. 20 (Lake St) and they went live on below dates.
Date of RLR camera implementation on Westbound Lake St at Mannheim Rd: 4/7/2009
Date of RLR camera implementation on Southbound Mannheim Rd at Lake St: 9/25/2009
There have been no Signal timing (or any other settings of Traffic Controller) changes.
According to the Average Daily Traffic (ADT), volume from IDOT, the volume of the Westbound of this intersection increased from 22,500 in September of 2008 to 26,600 in December of 2010. (See Tab III) Despite the increases in traffic volume, the crash data from 2008 to 2009 shows “Total” accidents were reduced by 45.45% at this red-light camera intersection. (See Tab II)
Numerous studies from the US, as well as the experience of many other cities, indicate decreases in red light running violations and collisions after cameras were installed and Mannheim Rd at Lake St was not an exception. Other intersections not monitored by automated enforcement may also experience a decrease in violations and accidents as a result of the presence of this automated enforcement system changing driving behaviors.
Because enhanced traffic safety is the principal aim of RLR Camera enforcement programs, we, SafeSpeed, LLC, strongly recommend that we should remain an integral part of a traffic systems process that incorporates public education, enforcement and engineering at this location.
Reference No: 016-43280 US Rt . 12/20/45 (Mannheim Rd) at US Rt . 20 (Lake St)
The results showed Total accidents were reduced by 75% at this intersection and Total accidents were dropped by 45.45% from year 2008 to year 2009. Oregon Law requires that cities provide a public information campaign to inform local drivers about
the use of RLR Cameras before citations are actually issued. Educating the public is a critical step in
reducing red light running. In order to effectively change poor driving habits, drivers must be made
aware that RLR Cameras are in use. It is recommended that cities hold well-publicized kickoff events
and issue periodic press releases about the effectiveness of RLR Camera enforcement within their
jurisdictions. Oregon law also requires that signs be posted, so far as practicable, on all major routes entering the
jurisdiction indicating that compliance with traffic control devices is enforced through cameras. The
law further requires that signs indicating that a camera may be in operation be posted near each
intersection where a camera is installed