Upload
magnus-campbell
View
232
Download
9
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
銀河団における超高エネルギー物理過程
w. Felix Aharonian (MPIK), 杉山直 ( 国立天文台 ) 井上 進 ( 国立天文台 )
w. Günter Sigl, Eric Armengaud (IAP)Francesco Miniati (ETH)
ZeV
GeV
TeV
100keV
HESS Auger
GLASTSuzaku
UHE proton inducedhard X-rays & -raysUHE cosmic ray nuclei
cluster accretion shocks
accretion(minor merger)
(major) merger
Ryu et al. 03
strong (high M) shock-> high injection, hard spectra
weak (low M) shock-> low injection, soft spectra
crucial for nonthermal high energy phenomena
UHECRs from cluster accretion shocks?
Norman, Achterberg & Melrose ‘95Kang, Ryu & Jones 96Kang, Rachen & Biermann 97
GRB
AGN jet
clusters
energetic requirements
Lcluster~1046 erg/sncluster~10-6 Mpc-3
Pcluster~~1040 erg s-1Mpc-3
UHECR@1020 eVuCR ~10-20 erg cm-3
CR ~0.3(1) Gyr for p (Fe)PCR ~3x1037 erg s-1Mpc-3
massive clusters (~1015 M)
energetically plausible, butproton Emax insufficient
11
10
9
8
720.520.019.519.018.518.017.5
log E [eV]
UHE proton-induced pair emission from cluster accretion shocks
accel. vs CMB losses, lifetime
photopion
lifetimeescape accel.
Bs=0.1 G
photopair
accel.Bs=1 G
Rs~3.2 MpcVs~2200 km/s
e.g. Coma-like clusterM=2x1015 M(T=8.3 keV)WMAP cosmo. parameters
Bs,eq~ 6 G
Emax~1018-1019 eVphotopair important
tacc=(20/3) rgc/Vs2
shock radius, velocity, etc.
Bohm limit shock accel.
SNR observations ~1e.g. Völk et al. 05
shock lifetimets~2 Gyr < tadiab~6 Gyr
max p energy
Inoue, Aharonian & Sugiyama 2005 ApJ 628, L9
emitted flux & detectability Coma-like cluster at D=100 Mpcsensitivities for 1 deg2 extended source
- large radiative efficiency from protons- hard (~-1.5) spectrum + rollover- sensitive to B
<-> primary IC, pp 0
(~-2)
> TeV absorption by IRB, CMB
• Inoue, Gabici, Aharonian & Rowell, HESS proposal, accepted
HESS
QuickTime˛ Ç∆ǻǵ êLí£ÉvÉçÉOÉâÉÄ
ǙDZÇÃÉsÉNÉ`ÉÉÇ å©ÇÈÇ…ÇÕïKóvÇ≈Ç∑ÅB
coming very soon!!!
Suzaku
X
X
TeV -ray and hard X-ray observations of clusters
• Inoue, Nakazawa, Fukazawa et al., Suzaku proposal, submitted
also expectingcontributions fromCANGAROO III
nuclei from cluster accretion shocks as UHECRs
107
108
109
1010
1011
1018
2 3 4 5 6
1019
2 3 4 5 6
1020
2 3 4 5 6
1021
log E [eV]
56Fephotopair+photopion CMBphotodisint FIRB+CMB
photodisint
photopair
Bs=0.1 G
Bs=1 GBs~1 G Johnston-Hollitt & Ekers ‘05
maximum E for heavy nuclei
if Bs~1 GEFe, max>~1020 eVphotopair important
Inoue, Sigl, Armengaud & Miniati, in prep.
UHE nuclei propagation calculations - realistic IGB models based on cosmological simulations- source density ~10-6 Mpc-3 ∝ baryon density- Emax(Z) from tacc vs. tloss, tlife- Galactic CR-like source composition (nFe/np~0.05)- interactions in CMB+FIRB, deflections in IGB including all secondary nuclei
56Fe
lifetimeescape
UHE nuclei from clusters: results
with IGB no IGB
spectra composition
anisotropyspectra, anisotropy, composition• consistent with current HiRes but not AGASA…• predictions: - “GZK” cutoff >1020 eV - heavy dominant >1019 eV - one or few extended source(s) >4x1019eV
UHE nuclei induced pairs
107
108
109
1010
1011
1018
2 3 4 5 6
1019
2 3 4 5 6
1020
2 3 4 5 6
1021
log E [eV]
56Fe
photodisint
photopair
Bs=0.1 G
Bs=1 G
107
108
109
1010
1011
1018
2 3 4 5 6
1019
2 3 4 5 6
1020
2 3 4 5 6
1021
log E [eV]
16O 56Fe16O
lifetimeescape
photopair importantadditional hard X-ray and -ray emission, broader spectradirect proof of nuclei acceleration in cluster accretion shocks
summary
• acceleration to E~1018-1019eV• efficient secondary pair emission -> hard X sync. Suzaku, NeXT (imaging), … -> TeV IC HESS, CANG.III, other current IACTs• important probe of UHE p acceleration, B in cluster outskirts, …
UHE p-induced emission
stay tuned for upcoming HESS & Suzaku observations!
UHECR nuclei
• Fe acceleration to E~1020eV plausible if B~1 G• UHECR flux and spectra consistent if nFe/np~0.05 at source• predictions for Auger, TA, EUSO: - spectra: cutoff >~1020 eV - composition: p dominant ~<1019 eV, Fe dominant >~1020 eV - anisotropy: a few extended sources >~4x1019 eV• additional hard X/TeV from pairs HESS, Suzaku, …
UHE processes in cluster accretion shocks
proton injection luminosity in accretion shocks
accretion rate & luminosityM(M,z)=fgasfaccVs
3/GLacc(M,z)=fgasfaccGMM/Rs
~2.7x1046 (fgas/0.16) (facc/0.1) (M/ 2x1015 M)5/3 erg/sproton luminosity & spectrumLp(M,z)=fpLacc(M,z) fp=0.1Fp(E,M,z) ∝ E-2 exp(-E/Emax)
secondary production and emission processesp+CMB→ p+ e+e-
Ep~1018eV E+-~+-Ep~1015eV, L+-~t+-/tinj f(E>1017.7eV) Lp
→ e+e-+B(~G)→ syn. E~keV-MeV e+e-+CMB→ IC E~TeV-PeV
Aharonian 02 code solve proton & pair kinetic eq.
..
model vs Coma data
- hard X? need large p luminosity- radio something else
sensitivities for 1 deg2 extended source
-15
-14
-13
-12
-11
-10
1050-5
log E [eV]
Lp=9x1045
erg/sTinj=4 Gyr, Rs=3.2 MpcBs=0.7 (G Emax=6.3 10x 18 )eV
=10n -6 cm-3
=100 D Mpc
EUVERXTE
EGRET
GLASTHESS
HXDNeXTHXI
NeXTSGD
e+e- syn e+e- IC
pp0
BSAX
hard X data <1 deg
UHECRs: energy losses during propagation
QuickTime˛ Ç∆ǻǵ êLí£ÉvÉçÉOÉâÉÄ
ǙDZÇÃÉsÉNÉ`ÉÉÇ å©ÇÈÇ…ÇÕïKóvÇ≈Ç∑ÅB
p+CMB→ p+ e+e- Ep>~5x1017eVp+CMB→ p+ Ep>~7x1019eV
Dp, 20eV <~100 Mpc
A+FIRB→ A+ e+e-
A+FIRB→ A-iN +iN
intergalactic B fields models based oncosmological simulations
Sigl, Miniati& Ensslin 03,04
1. shock generation 2. uniform seed
normalized to cluster magnetic fields
source distributionNs=10-6 Mpc-3, ∝ baryon densityrandomly distribute, many realizations
source composition
Sigl & Armengaud 05
observed Galactic CR at low Eheavy elements enhanced, Fe/p~0.1
observed Galactic CR at high Efurther enhanced? Fe/p~1/4 @1015eV
Hoerandel 05
“Galactic CR-like”
observed metallicityat cluster outskirts~0.1 solar
Finoguenov et al 03
current data on UHE composition Watson astro-ph/0408110
- E>2x1019 eV: no data at all! (too low statistics)- E<2x1019 eV: much greater uncertainties than often advertised
With field:Isotropy consistentwith current statistics
Without field: probablytoo anisotropic due tolow source density
No anisotropy for ~100 eventsabove 4x1019 eV.
Significant anisotropy shouldappear for > 1000 eventsabove 4x1019 eV.
for 1 particular realizationresults: sky map