Upload
camilla-may
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
+Week 2 Seminar
State and Local Homeland Security Capabilities
Lance Oakland
+How did you feel about week 1?
Any
Questions,
Comments,
Complaints
about Week #1..??
+ Unit 2 Power Point Analysis Create a PowerPoint presentation consisting of 8-10 slides (excluding the
title slide, table of contents slide, and references slide) that meets the following requirements:
Identify 2 specific terrorist groups One (1) domestic terrorist group One (1) transnational terrorist group
Assess the similarities and differences between the two groups, in the following 5 specific areas: Underlying ideology of the group Specific goals the group is trying to achieve or grievances it is trying to
redress Kinds of targets preferred by the group Specific terrorist tactics the group prefers to employ in furtherance of its
goals The rationale used by the group to justify its terrorist acts, and to
explain why it thinks these acts will facilitate achievement of its stated end-goals
Submit your project to the Dropbox by the end of Unit 2 in the basked titled Unit 2: PowerPoint Analysis
+
Any Questions
about the
Unit 2
Power Point
Analysis Project?
Recognizing that casualties are inevitable in a terrorist attack, that the efforts of authorities were extraordinary and heroic on September 11th, 2001, and the benefits of looking back in retrospect, what steps might have been taken prior to the event to improve the overall response?
+What advantages did the responders have in Arlington, Virginia (the Pentagon attack) over those responding to the
World Trade Center attack?
+
What are the
actual goals of
terrorism?
+ Page 44 of the text states that a study revealed that approximately half of Americans feel that in order to “curb terrorism” they believe it will be necessary to “give up some of their civil liberties.”
Do you agree?
If so, which civil liberties do you feel might need to be surrendered to some degree?
If not, why do you feel this way?
+ The “era of homeland security” as a policing concept is
described on pages 47- 48.
Where do our contemporary police agencies currently
need the most development
to meet the needs of this era
(where do they fall short)?
+When considering Greene’s
five models of policing listed on page 49, do you feel that
any police agency fits a particular model completely,
or are police departments a mixture
of all of the models?
Explain your answer.
+Seminar - #2
Homeland Security Presidential Directives
National Response Goals
Universal Task List
Target Capabilities
+Homeland Security Presidential
Directives
Homeland Security Presidential Directives are issued by the President on matters pertaining to Homeland Security.
Homeland Security Presidential Directives
“Elevated Threat”: Warns of a credible terrorist threat against the United States
“Imminent Threat”: Warns of a credible, specific, and impending terrorist threat against the United States
+Homeland Security Presidential
Directives HSPD - 5: Management of Domestic Incidents
HSPD - 7 Critical Infrastructure Identification, Prioritization, and Protection
HSPD - 8: National Preparedness
+Homeland Security Presidential Directives - #5 Management of Domestic Incidents
Enhances the ability of the United States to manage domestic incidents by establishing a single, comprehensive National Incident Management System (NIMS).
+HSPD #7: Critical Infrastructure Identification, Prioritization, and Protection
Establishes a national policy
for federal departments and
agencies to identify and
prioritize United States critical
infrastructure and key resources
and to protect them from
terrorist attacks.
HSPD – 8: National Preparedness Identifies steps for
improved coordination in response to incidents. This directive describes the way federal departments and agencies will prepare for such a response, including prevention activities during the early stages of a terrorism incident. This directive is a companion to HSPD-5.
+Homeland Security Presidential Directives - 8 (cont)
National Preparedness Goal -
“Achieve and
sustain capabilities
to prevent . . .
and . . .
respond. . . “
+National Preparedness System
Encompasses 7 documents - 1. National Preparedness Goal2. National Planning Scenarios3. Universal Task List 4. Target Capabilities List5. National Response Framework6. National Incident Management System7. National Infrastructure Protection Plan
+ National Planning Scenarios Scenario 1: Nuclear Detonation – 10-Kiloton Improvised Nuclear Device
Scenario 2: Biological Attack – Aerosol Anthrax
Scenario 3: Biological Disease Outbreak – Pandemic Influenza
Scenario 4: Biological Attack – Plague
Scenario 5: Chemical Attack – Blister Agent
Scenario 6: Chemical Attack – Toxic Industrial Chemicals
Scenario 7: Chemical Attack – Nerve Agent
Scenario 8: Chemical Attack – Chlorine Tank Explosion
Scenario 9: Natural Disaster – Major Earthquake
Scenario 10: Natural Disaster – Major Hurricane
Scenario 11: Radiological Attack – Radiological Dispersal Devices
Scenario 12: Explosives Attack – Bombing Using Improvised Explosive Devices
Scenario 13: Biological Attack – Food Contamination
Scenario 14: Biological Attack – Foreign Animal Disease (Foot and Mouth Disease)
Scenario 15: Cyber Attack
+ Universal Task List (UTL)
Developed from the National Preparedness System
Provides a comprehensive menu of essential tasks for major events
Over 3,000 tasks
Incident Phases
Awareness Level Actions
Recovery PhaseLast Living Victim Removed Restoration Phase
Contamination Survey Completed
Response PhaseScene Control Begins
Notification PhaseIncident Recognized
+Target Capabilities ListTCL identifies 37 target capabilities
Common capabilities Prevention Protection Response Immediate recovery
Planning tool for preparing the Nation for all-hazard events including those in the NPS.
+ Target Capabilities List – Common Capabilities
Planning
Communications
Risk Management
Community Preparedness & Participation
Intelligence, Information Sharing & Dissemination
+ Target Capabilities List – Prevention
Information Gathering and Recognition of Indicators and Warnings
Intelligence Analysis and Production
Counterterrorism and LE
CBRNE Detection
+ Target Capabilities List – Protection
Critical Infrastructure Protection
Food and Agricultural Safety and Defense
Epidemiological Surveillance and Investigation
Lab Testing
+ Target Capabilities List – Respond
On-site Mgmt
EOC Mgmt
Critical resources distribution
Volunteers
Responder health and safety
Public security and safety
Animal Disease support
Environmental health
Explosive device response
Fire response support
HAZMAT response and decontamination
Citizen evacuation (reverse)
Isolation and quarantine
Search and rescue
Public info and warning
Emergency triage
Medical Surge
Medical Supplies
Mass prophylaxis
Mass Care (shelter, food)
Fatality Management
+ Target Capabilities List – Recovery
Structural Damage Assessment
Restoration of Lifelines
Economic and community recovery
+ Target Capabilities List
Uncommon emergencies Large scale disasters
Pandemic health emergencies
Other major incidents
+ Target Capabilities List
Designed to be enhanced and refined over time.
New lessons learned
+HSEEP
“HSEEP”
Homeland Security
Exercise And Evaluation
Program
Building Block Approach
Full ScaleFull Scale
FunctionalFunctional
DrillDrill
Corrective Corrective ActionAction
Table TopTable Top
Plan ReviewPlan Review
SeminarSeminar
Tabletop Exercises
A tabletop exercise is a facilitated analysis of an emergency situation in an informal, stress-free environment. It is designed to elicit active, constructive discussion as participants examine and resolve problems based on existing operational plans and identify where those plans need to be refined.
NIPSTA can assist agencies in the development of Incident Action Plan (IAP templates to be used to address various scenarios.
+Functional Exercises
A Functional Exercise simulates an emergency in the most realistic manner possible, short of moving real people and equipment to an actual site.
Functional Exercises are normally conducted in the Emergency Operations Center.
Full Scale Exercises
The Full Scale Exercise is used to evaluate the operational capabilities of systems, functional interfacing, and interaction during an extended period. It involves testing a major portion of operations plans and overall organization under field conditions.
+ Summary
Establishing- PlansProceduresSystemsInteragency relationshipsTrainingExercise programsMutual aid agreements
+ Interview Analysis – Unit #3aFor this assessment, please interview at least 2 (or
more) friends, relatives, colleagues, etc. to ascertain answers to the following questions
1) What impact did the events of 9/11 had on their sense of security/vulnerability?
2) Do they agree or disagree with the U.S. response to the attacks? Which aspects of the U.S. response do they feel have
been most successful and effective? Which aspects of the U.S. response do they feel have
been least effective or even counter-productive? Do they feel safer now than they did after 9/11? Why
or why not? What areas of vulnerability do they think have not
been addressed that should be?
+ Interview Analysis – Unit #3b Be sure to ask detailed follow-up questions. Here are
some suggestions to get you started.
Do they agree or disagree with the term “War on Terrorism?” Do they think the “war” will ever be “won”, and all terrorist threats completely eliminated? If they disagree on the term, what would they suggest as an alternative?
Do they feel civil liberties, including privacy rights, have been curtailed significantly in the wake of the U.S. response? If so, in what way? Is some curtailment of some civil liberties for some individuals a necessary step, even if not ideal? Do they agree with the government’s justifications for wiretapping, etc?
Do they agree with holding captured suspects indefinitely, without charge? Or do they think suspects should enjoy due process and be tried in civilian courts?
+ Interview Analysis – Unit #3c What are their thoughts on secret prisons,
extraordinary rendition, and the Enemy Combatants at Guantanamo Bay?
Do they agree with the rationale behind the invasion of either Afghanistan or Iraq or both?
Are citizens of other countries at all justified in their negative view of America’s stand in the World?
Write a 3 - 5 page paper identifying the specific questions on which your interview subjects differ, and articulate the interviewee’s reasoning behind those answers.
Share your opinion on the same questions, and on the subjects’ answers. Did any of their answers change your mind, or cause you to rethink your own opinion? If so, how? If not, why not?
+ Next Week’s Seminar
Federal and Local Interaction
The Unit #3 Seminar will focus on the:
• Structure of Homeland Security (including Federal and Local interaction);
• Civilian / Community Involvement;
• Terrorism vs. Disaster Scenes;
&
• The Homeland Security Act of 2002.
+
Have a
GREAT
Week.!!