2011 14 June 25, pp165-182
- 165 -
-
A Study of Relationship between High-Performance Work System and Employee AttitudeThe Mediating Effect of Organizational Climate
Yi-Ju Chen1 Min-Shi Liu2
(Arthur, 1994)
1 2(100 56 02-23111531 3696E-mail: [email protected])
2011 14
- 166 -
(Takeuchi et al., 2009)(Takeuchi et al., 2007)(Whitener, 2001)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
(Evans & Davis, 2005)(Duncan & Hoffman, 1981)
(Guthrie, 2001)(Arthur, 1994)(High-Performance Work Systems, HPWS)
(Delery & Doty, 1996)(Guthrie et al., 2002(Guthrie et al., 2002)(Guthrie et al., 2002)(Guthrie et al., 2002)(Guthrie et al., 2002)(Delery & Doty, 1996)(Delery & Doty, 1996)(Delery & Doty, 1996)
-
- 167 -
Delery & Doty(1996)
Litwin & Stringer(1968)
Owens(1987)
(1975)(2002)
Schnieder & Bartlett(1970) 6 Litwin & Stringer (1968) 9
(2002)
(job satisfaction)(Hoppock, 1935)Locke(1976)(1990)
Eahore & Taber(1975)
1.
2.
Locke(1976)
2011 14
- 168 -
Judge et al. (1999)
(organizational commitment)Porter et al. (1974)
(Goffin R.D & Gellatly I . E, 2001)
(Salancik, 1977)
Mathieu & Zajac (1990)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Allen & Meyer (1996) 3
1.
2.
3.
(Meyer et al., 1989)
Allen & Meyer (1996) Meyer et al. (1993)
-
- 169 -
(Zohar, 2000)
(shared mental models)()(homogeneity)(Borucki & Burke, 1999)
1
1a
1b
1c
1d
(Litwin & Stringer, 1968)Altmann(2000)Karasick & Kirk(1968)
Prichard & Karasick(1973)
2
2a
2b
2c
2d
(Meyer & Herscovitch, 2001)(19962005)(1995)(2005)
2011 14
- 170 -
3
3a
3b
3c
3d
Litwin & Stringer(1968)
(Freeman et al., 2000)Altmann(2000)Prichard & Karasick(1973)Hickman(1987)
4
4a
4b
4c
4d
(Vandenberg et al., 1999)Meyer & Smith(2000)
Boxall & Macky(2009) 13
-
- 171 -
(1995)(2005)
5
5a
5b
5c
5d
2009 104 100 25 950 635 72 563 53.62%
()
Delery & Doty(1996) 7 23
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
2011 14
- 172 -
55.35%0.52-0.90 0.5Cronbachs 0.89
()
(2002) 4 20
1.
2.
3.
4.
58.89%0.50-0.85 0.5 Cronbachs 3-2 0.89
()
Locke(1976) Judge et al. (1999) 0.86
()
Allen & Meyer (1996) Meyer et al. (1993) 0.83
1(r=0.79p
-
- 173 -
(r= -0.13p
2011 14
- 174 -
(B=0.03, p
-
- 175 -
(B=0.58, p
2011 14
- 176 -
4
3 3a 3b 3c 3d
Beta t Beta t Beta t Beta t Beta t
0.00 0.09 0.01 0.19 -0.01 -0.23 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.21
0.03 1.07 0.03 0.99 0.04 1.68 0.04 1.41 0.02 0.68
-0.03 -0.92 -0.03 -1.06 -0.04 -1.08 -0.04 -1.37 -0.01 -0.26
0.04 1.33 0.05 1.45 0.02 0.49 0.03 0.79 0.06 1.74
0.68 6.7*** - - - - - - - -
- - 0.43 5.75*** - - - - - -
- - - - 0.55 4.65*** - - - -
- - - - - - 0.68 5.84*** - -
- - - - - - - - 0.60 6.50***
F 12.61*** 10.19*** 7.83*** 10.40*** 12.07***
R-Squre 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.09 0.10
R-Squre 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.08 0.09
*p
-
- 177 -
(0.56)(0.84) 4c 7 (B=0.71, p
2011 14
- 178 -
5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H4 H4a H4b H4c H4d
Beta t Beta t Beta t Beta t Beta t Beta t Beta t
0.00 0.10 -0.01 -0.28 -0.01 -0.29 -0.01 -0.25 -0.02 -0.38 -0.02 -0.37 -0.01 -0.25
-0.01 -1.62 0.00 -0.21 0.00 -0.05 0.00 -0.16 0.00 -0.06 0.00 0.20 -0.01 -0.26
0.01 1.65 0.05 1.64 0.04 1.48 0.04 1.52 0.05 1.62 0.03 1.13 0.05 1.78
0.03 3.46** 0.05 1.81 0.04 1.46 0.05 1.69 0.05 1.57 0.03 1.05 0.05 1.79
0.71 30.58*** 0.84 10.28*** 0.59 4.46*** 0.71 5.39*** 0.80 9.41*** 0.56 5.21*** 0.71 5.96***
- - - - 0.34 2.33** - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - 0.13 1.2 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - 0.15 1.39 - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - 0.53 3.85*** - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - 0.15 1.5
F 188.4*** 21.63*** 19.07*** 18.28*** 18.38*** 20.94*** 18.44***
R-Squre 0.63 0.16 0.17 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.17
R-Squre 0.63 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.18 0.16
*p
-
- 179 -
6
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
H5 H5a H5b H5c H5d
Beta t Beta t Beta t Beta t Beta t Beta t Beta t
0.00 0.10 0.01 0.12 0.01 0.11 0.01 0.10 0.00 -0.07 0.01 0.10 0.01 0.14
-0.01 -1.62 0.01 0.50 0.01 0.55 0.01 0.47 0.02 0.77 0.02 0.59 0.01 0.46
0.01 1.65 -0.01 -0.37 -0.01 -0.42 -0.01 -0.30 -0.01 -0.41 -0.02 -0.49 -0.01 -0.26
0.03 3.46** 0.08 2.41 0.07 2.27 0.08 2.46 0.06 1.99 0.07 2.19 0.08 2.39
0.71 30.58*** 0.72 8.02*** 0.63 4.30*** 0.80 5.47*** 0.65 6.93*** 0.65 5.40*** 0.61 4.67***
- - - - 0.12 0.75 - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -0.08 -0.67 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - 0.31 2.57 - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - 0.13 0.87 - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - 0.13 1.14
F 188.4*** 16.62*** 13.93*** 13.91*** 15.08*** 13.97*** 14.07***
R-Squre 0.63 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.13 0.13
R-Squre 0.63 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.12
*p
2011 14
- 180 -
()
()
() 25
( )(cross-sectional)(longitudinal)
()
()
(1996)
(1975)-35pp.13-56
-
- 181 -
(1990)
(2002)- C
(2005)
(2006)23(6)pp.649-675
Arthur, J. B. (1994), Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover, Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), pp.670-687.
Altmann, R.(2000), Forecasting your organizational climate. Journal of Property Management, 65(4), pp.62- 65.
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996), Affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, pp.252-276.
Boxall, P., & Macky, K. (2009), Research and Theory on High-Performance Work Systems: Progressing the High Involvement Stream, Human Management Resource Management Journal, 19(1), pp. 3-23.
Delery, J. E. & Doty, D. H. (1996), Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions, Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), pp. 802-835.
Duncan, G., and S. D. Hoffman (1981), The incidence and wage effects of overeducation, Economics of Education Review, 1(1), pp.75 - 86.
Evans, W. R. & Davis, W. D. (2005), High Performance Work Systems and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role Of Internal Social Structure, Journal of Management, 31(5), pp.758-775.
Freeman R.B., Kleiner, M.M., & Ostroff, C.(2000), The anatomy of employee involvement and its effects on firms and workers, Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research Inc.
Goffin RD, Gellatly I. E. (2001), A multi-rater Assessment of Organizational Commitment: Are Self-Report Measures Biased,Organizational Behavior, 22, pp.437-451.
Guthrie (2001), High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity Evidence from New Zealand, Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), pp.180-190.
Guthrie, J.P., Spell, C. S, & Nyamori, R. O. (2002), Correlates and consequences of High Involvement Work PracticesThe Role of Competitive Strategy.
Hickman, J.S. (1987), A Comparison of the Relationship of Faculty Perceptions of Organizational Climate to Expressed Job Satisfaction in Baccalaureate Degree nursing Programs, Dissertation Abstracts International, NoAAD8711384.
Hoppock, R. (1935), Job Satisfaction. New York: Happer & Row.
Judge.T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J. & Barrick, M.R. (1999), The big five personal traits, general mental ability, and career success the life span, Personnel Psychology, 2(3), pp.621-652.
Karasick, E. & Kirk, R. (1968),Managerial climate, work groups, and organizational
2011 14
- 182 -
performance, Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, pp.252-271.
Litwin, G. H. & Stringer, R. A. (1968), Motivation and organizational climate. BostonHarvard University Graduates School of Business Administration, Division of Research.
Locke, E. A. (1976),The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction. in M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, pp.1297-1349. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Mathieu, J. E. & D. M. Zajac (1990), A Review and Meta-analysis of the Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences of Organizational Commitment, Psychological Bulletin, 108, pp.171-194.
Meyer, J.P., & Herscovitch, L. (2001), Commitment in the workplace: Toward a General Model, Human Resource Management Review, 11(3), pp.299-326
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N.J., Smith, C.A. (1993), Commitment to organization and occupationsExtension and test of a three-component conceptualiz
