36
1 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

1

Ascendient

The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System

September 30, 2015

Page 2: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

2

www.nchastrategicpartners.org

AscendientWebinar Instructions

Webinar will begin shortly All attendees muted, in listen-only mode Submit questions through question box If a disconnection occurs, please log back in using

the access code emailed to you We are recording this webinar and will share a link

to the recorded presentation via email

Page 3: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

October 8, 2015 Webinar

The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System

Page 4: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

4

Guide for Today’s Discussion

Introductions

History of Maryland Model

Current Model Structure

Initial Progress & Lessons Learned

Implications & Near-term Considerations for NC

Page 5: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

5

Our Firm:Health and Healthcare Focus

Page 6: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

6

Our Firm:Locations

National HarborMaryland

Quadrangle Office ParkChapel Hill

Page 7: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

7

Today’s Presenters

Brian Ackerman, MHA

Principal

National Harbor Office

Daniel Carter, MBA

Principal

Chapel Hill Office

Page 8: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

History of the Maryland Model

Page 9: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

9

History...the Old Model

• Maryland - Only state where hospitals (and insurers) don’t decide how much to charge for care

• Health Services Cost Review Commission – Establishes hospital rates...all payors must pay the same rate

• 26 Percent – The amount Maryland hospitals were above the national average cost per discharge in 1976

• Medicare waiver – Maryland hospitals “waived” from Federal Medicare payment models

• Criteria – Waiver to remain in place as long as: The system remains “all-payor” Inpatient payments per Medicare discharge grow

at a rate less than the nation

Page 10: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

10

The Old Model...Results

Source: Maryland HSCRC

Page 11: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

11

The Old Model...Results

Source: Maryland HSCRC

Page 12: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

12

The Old Model...Limitations for a Future Delivery System

Inpatient Only

Medicare Only

Cost per Unit/ Hospital Stay

Page 13: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

Current Model Structure

Page 14: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

14

Current Waiver...Why it Should Matter to You

Page 15: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

15

Current Waiver...Shifting Focus

Old ModelWaiver

Modernization

Inpatient Only

Care Focus All Hospital Care

Payor FocusMedicare Only All payers

Metric FocusCost per Unit/ Hospital Stay

Total Cost of Hospital Care

& Quality

Page 16: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

16

Waiver Modernization: What it Means for Maryland Hospitals

Global Payment Model linked to total hospital revenue received

from all payors

Ceiling (and floor) placed on a hospital’s total revenue based on recent top-line performance

E.g. If your total revenue was $200M last year, it will be

$200M next year...with some slight adjustments

More volume does not create more revenue...only increased expenses and lower margins

Page 17: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

17

Waiver Modernization:How Hospital Revenue is Calculated

Base Year Revenue

X Adjustments

Allowed Revenue

Global Payment Model

• Population growth

• Quality scores

• Shift to unregulated setting

• Service level changes (e.g. program closure)

• Market share changes

Page 18: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

18

Waiver Modernization:Terms of Agreement with Medicare

• Must achieve $330M Medicare savings over five years

• Maryland’s all-payer per capita total hospital cost growth limited to 3.58%...10-year CAGR for per capita GDP

• Limit total Medicare spending in Maryland to no more than national growth

• Reduce Maryland readmission rate to national average within five years...currently ranked 49 of 51 in the U.S.

• Reduce hospital-acquired conditions by 30 percent within five years

• If Maryland fails during five-year performance period, hospitals will transition to national Medicare payment systems

Page 19: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

Initial Progress & Lessons Learned

Page 20: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

20

Waiver Modernization:Recent Performance Dashboard

Source: www.mhaonline.org

Medicare savings to-date: Estimated at ~$100M

Page 21: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

21

Waiver Modernization:Additional Performance Measures

Operating profits

$71M or 15%

Operating margin 1%

# of Hospitals w/ Losses

10 to 7

Hospital Admission

s

4.1%

Potentially Avoidable Admission

s

6.0%ED Visits Flat

Page 22: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

22

What’s Changed

Increased use & availability of:

• Health coaches

• In-home post-discharge visits

• Social workers in the ED

• Transportation to primary care appts.

• Nurse hotlines

• Bedside prescription delivery

• Subsidized medicationsPriority on partnerships:

• Strengthened collaboration and coordination with primary care and SNFs

• Meaningful health coalitions

• Physician education

• Increased data sharing

Population health focus:

• Additional wellness initiatives

• Expansion of mental health & substance abuse clinics

• Use of predictive analytics

• Additional mobile clinics

Page 23: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

23

What’s Changed:Focus on Chronic Disease Management

Understanding of most at risk/costly patients In-home visits after discharge, to connect people with

needed support and resources Free or reduced-cost clinics for underserved patients with

chronic diseases (including mental health and substance abuse)

Tele-health monitoring for chronic disease management Increased community health education

Page 24: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

24

What’s Next for Maryland?

Waiver expansion...to physicians,

unregulated settings, post-acute providers

Page 25: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

Implications and Near-Term Considerationsfor North Carolina

Page 26: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

26

So...What Does it All Mean?

Page 27: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

27

Reset Your Expectations...Discharges will Continue to Decline

Current Discharges

Population Change

ACSAs PSAs Misc. Conditions Medicare Readmissions

2025 Discharges0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

Dis

cha

rge

s in

Avg

. N

C M

ark

et

Growth in discharges Decline in discharges

Source: Ascendient “Healthytown” predictive modeling based on DRG-specific data from Truven

20%-

25%

Page 28: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

28

Reset Your Expectations:Healthytown 2025

A complete copy of the report can be found at:

http://ascendient.com/2015/08/healthytown-usa/

Healthytown, USATransformation of Healthcare Delivery in a Statistically Average American Community

35%ED Visits

86%Primary Care Utilization

46%

Primary Care Physician Demand

Page 29: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

29

Rethink How/Where You Will Grow

Although uncertainty around future payment methods still remains, we are clearly moving away from a system that rewards volume:

Reduced Re-admissions

Bundled Payment

ACOs or “ACO-like”

organizations

What it Looks Like

Volume Based

Outcome BasedPayment

Method

Key Implication: Most of today’s revenue centers will be tomorrow’s cost

centers

Fee-for-service

Page 30: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

30

Redefine Traditional Definitions

LEAN within our departments

LEAN-mindset across the community

Efficiency

A nice thought A requirementCollabor-

ation

Of patients/volume

Of covered livesMarket Share

As a consideration As a priorityFlexibility

Past Future

Page 31: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

31

Learn to Accept Greater Risk...Quickly!

Hospitals & Health Systems

Commercial Payors,Federal & State Payors

Risk

Where to start?1. Begin where you’re already at risk...employees, self-pay2. Leverage pilot programs, where appropriate

Page 32: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

32

Learn to Accept Greater Risk...CMS Comprehensive Care for Joint

Replacement (CCJR)

• Medicare’s first mandatory bundled payment model• Applies to hip and knee replacement patients• Will hold hospitals accountable for the quality and cost of care

through 90 days post-discharge• Applies to hospitals within 18 NC counties• At conclusion of transition period payment will be regionally

based: Within the South Atlantic, 69% of CCJR hospitals have episode

spending above the regional average*

Sources: *ww.avalere.com; ^Excerpt from Ascendient work plan

Assess Data/ Know Where you Stand

Assess Your Alternatives

Develop Your Narrow Network

Implement & Monitor

Phases of Preparation^

Page 33: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

33

So...What Should We Be Doing Today?

1. Enhance and expand collaborative efforts across the continuum

2. Know who your most at-risk patients are...establish proactive processes for intervention, follow-up, and monitoring

3. Build flexibility into new provider contracts

4. Start managing the health of those populations for which you are already at risk

5. Build your IT infrastructure:a) Can you track the cost/utilization of a patient across

your system?

b) Can you track the cost/utilization of a patient across your community?

c) Are you collecting information necessary to support future predictive analytics efforts?

Page 34: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

34

What Hospitals in NC Are Already Doing

• Developing profiles of all providers/facilities within the community and prioritizing those for collaboration

• Establishing structure to develop physician leaders... particularly within primary care

• Developing processes and structure to most fully leverage advanced care practitioners

• Piloting population health management initiatives on employees

• Centralizing services and/or reducing unnecessary duplication across the system

• Developing “Gap” assessment related to the competencies necessary for participation in a clinically integrated network

Page 35: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

35

And in Conclusion...Always Remember

Page 36: 0 Ascendient The Maryland Model – Strategic Considerations for a Fixed Payment System September 30, 2015

36

Thank You!

Brian Ackerman

[email protected]

240.776.4752

Daniel Carter

[email protected]

919.403.3300