Upload
agus-purwanto
View
227
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
1/36
1
JAWABAN TUGAS MATA KULIAH
DESAIN DAN ANALISIS EKSPERIMENDosen: Dr. Suparman I.A., M.Sc.
Soal 3.4
Sebuah eksperimen dilakukan untuk menentukan apakah temperatur pembakaran mempengaruhikepadatan batu bata. Hasil eksperimen tersebut adalah:
Pertanyaan:a. Dengan menggunakan = 0,05, apakah temperatur pembakaran mempengaruhi kepadatan batu
bata?
b. Apakah cocok menggunakan Uji Duncan dalam eksperimen ini?c. Apakah asumsinya terpenuhi?
d. Gambarkan grafiknya!
Jawaban 3.4
Hasil Analisis Varians dengan menggunkan SPSS adalah sebagai berikut:
Descriptives
Density/Kepadatan
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Minimum MaximumLower Bound Upper Bound
100 5 21.740 .1140 .0510 21.598 21.882 21.6 21.9
125 4 21.500 .1414 .0707 21.275 21.725 21.4 21.7
150 5 21.720 .1643 .0735 21.516 21.924 21.5 21.9
175 4 21.700 .2160 .1080 21.356 22.044 21.4 21.9
Total 18 21.672 .1742 .0411 21.586 21.759 21.4 21.9
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
2/36
2
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Density
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
.544 3 14 .660
ANOVA
Density
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups .156 3 .052 2.024 .157
Within Groups .360 14 .026
Total .516 17
Post Hoc Tests
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable:Density
(I)Temperatur
(J)Temperatur
Mean Difference(I-J) Std. Error Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Tukey HSD 100 125 .2400 .1076 .163 -.073 .553
150 .0200 .1014 .997 -.275 .315
175 .0400 .1076 .982 -.273 .353
125 100 -.2400 .1076 .163 -.553 .073
150 -.2200 .1076 .219 -.533 .093
175 -.2000 .1134 .330 -.530 .130
150 100 -.0200 .1014 .997 -.315 .275
125 .2200 .1076 .219 -.093 .533
175 .0200 .1076 .998 -.293 .333
175 100 -.0400 .1076 .982 -.353 .273
125 .2000 .1134 .330 -.130 .530
150 -.0200 .1076 .998 -.333 .293
Homogeneous Subsets
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
3/36
3
Density
Temperatur N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1
Tukey HSDa 125 4 21.500
175 4 21.700
150 5 21.720
100 5 21.740
Sig. .163
dinDuncana 125 4 21.500
175 4 21.700
150 5 21.720
100 5 21.740
Sig. .057
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 4.444.
Berdasarkan hasil Analisis Varians dapat dikemukakan bahwa
a. Temperatur pembakaran tidak berpengaruh nyata terhadap density/kepadatan batu bata. Hal ini
ditunjukkan oleh Statistik F = 2,024 signifikan pada = 0,157 yang lebih besar dari 0,05sebagaimana ditetapkan.
Dalam uji lanjut (Post Hoc Tests) juga terbukti seluruh perbedaan rata-rata kepadatan batu bata
tidak berbeda nyata pada = 0,05.
b. Uji Duncan tidak cocok digunakan pada eksperimen ini karena jumlah data sampel kepadatanbatu bata pada setiap temperature tidak sama.
c. Asumsi Uji Duncan tidak terpenuhi.d. Grafinya sebagai berikut:
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
4/36
4
Jawaban 3.6
Hasil eksperimen untuk membuktikan pengaruh Tipe Coating terhadap konduktiitas tabung padapabrik televise adalah sebagai berikut:
Hasil Analisis Varians dengan SPSS adalah sebagai berikut:
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
5/36
5
Descriptives
Conductivity
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Minimum MaximumLower Bound Upper Bound
Tipe1 4 145.00 3.916 1.958 138.77 151.23 141 150
Tipe2 4 145.25 6.652 3.326 134.67 155.83 137 152
Tipe3 4 132.25 3.862 1.931 126.10 138.40 127 136
Tipe4 4 129.25 2.062 1.031 125.97 132.53 127 132
Total 16 137.94 8.489 2.122 133.41 142.46 127 152
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Conductivity
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
2.370 3 12 .122
ANOVA
Conductivity
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 844.688 3 281.562 14.302 .000
Within Groups 236.250 12 19.688
Total 1080.938 15
Homogeneous Subsets
Conductivity
Coating N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2
Tukey HSDa Tipe4 4 129.25
Tipe3 4 132.25
Tipe1 4 145.00
Tipe2 4 145.25
Sig. .776 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 4.000.
(a) Dengan menggunakan = 0,05, hasil ANOVA membuktikan bahwa tipe Coating memberikan
pengaruh yang berbeda terhadap kondutivitas tabung.(b) Hasil uji lanjut terhadap rata-rata semua perlakuan adalah sebagai berikut:
Post Hoc Tests
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
6/36
6
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable:Conductivity
(I)Coating
(J)Coating
Mean Difference(I-J) Std. Error Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Tukey HSD Tipe1 Tipe2 -.250 3.137 1.000 -9.56 9.06
Tipe3 12.750* 3.137 .007 3.44 22.06
Tipe4 15.750* 3.137 .001 6.44 25.06
Tipe2 Tipe1 .250 3.137 1.000 -9.06 9.56
Tipe3 13.000* 3.137 .006 3.69 22.31
Tipe4 16.000* 3.137 .001 6.69 25.31
Tipe3 Tipe1 -12.750* 3.137 .007 -22.06 -3.44
Tipe2 -13.000* 3.137 .006 -22.31 -3.69
Tipe4 3.000 3.137 .776 -6.31 12.31
Tipe4 Tipe1 -15.750* 3.137 .001 -25.06 -6.44
Tipe2 -16.000* 3.137 .001 -25.31 -6.69
Tipe3 -3.000 3.137 .776 -12.31 6.31
LSD Tipe1 Tipe2 -.250 3.137 .938 -7.09 6.59
Tipe3 12.750* 3.137 .002 5.91 19.59
Tipe4 15.750* 3.137 .000 8.91 22.59
Tipe2 Tipe1 .250 3.137 .938 -6.59 7.09
Tipe3 13.000* 3.137 .001 6.16 19.84
Tipe4 16.000* 3.137 .000 9.16 22.84
Tipe3 Tipe1 -12.750* 3.137 .002 -19.59 -5.91
Tipe2 -13.000* 3.137 .001 -19.84 -6.16
Tipe4 3.000 3.137 .358 -3.84 9.84
Tipe4 Tipe1 -15.750*
3.137 .000 -22.59 -8.91Tipe2 -16.000* 3.137 .000 -22.84 -9.16
Tipe3 -3.000 3.137 .358 -9.84 3.84
Bonferroni Tipe1 Tipe2 -.250 3.137 1.000 -10.14 9.64
Tipe3 12.750* 3.137 .009 2.86 22.64
Tipe4 15.750* 3.137 .002 5.86 25.64
Tipe2 Tipe1 .250 3.137 1.000 -9.64 10.14
Tipe3 13.000* 3.137 .008 3.11 22.89
Tipe4 16.000* 3.137 .002 6.11 25.89
Tipe3 Tipe1 -12.750* 3.137 .009 -22.64 -2.86
Tipe2 -13.000* 3.137 .008 -22.89 -3.11
Tipe4 3.000 3.137 1.000 -6.89 12.89
Tipe4 Tipe1 -15.750* 3.137 .002 -25.64 -5.86
Tipe2 -16.000* 3.137 .002 -25.89 -6.11
Tipe3 -3.000 3.137 1.000 -12.89 6.89
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
(c) Perhitungan dengan interval kepercayaan 95% menghasilkan rata-rata konduktivitas Tipe
Coating 4 sebesar 129,25 dengan konduktivitas minimum 127 dan maksimum 132.
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
7/36
7
Perhitungan dengan interval kepercayaan 99% menghasilkan perbedaan rata-ratakonduktivitas Tipe Coating 1 dan 4 sebagai berikut:
Multiple Comparisons
ConductivityLSD
(I)Coating
(J)Coating
Mean Difference(I-J) Std. Error Sig.
99% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Tipe1 Tipe2 -.250 3.137 .938 -9.83 9.33
Tipe3 12.750* 3.137 .002 3.17 22.33
Tipe4 15.750* 3.137 .000 6.17 25.33
Tipe2 Tipe1 .250 3.137 .938 -9.33 9.83
Tipe3 13.000* 3.137 .001 3.42 22.58
Tipe4 16.000* 3.137 .000 6.42 25.58
Tipe3 Tipe1 -12.750* 3.137 .002 -22.33 -3.17
Tipe2 -13.000* 3.137 .001 -22.58 -3.42
Tipe4 3.000 3.137 .358 -6.58 12.58Tipe4 Tipe1 -15.750* 3.137 .000 -25.33 -6.17
Tipe2 -16.000* 3.137 .000 -25.58 -6.42
Tipe3 -3.000 3.137 .358 -12.58 6.58
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.01 level.
Hasil uji LSD Pada tabel di atas menunjukkan bahwa Tipe Coating 1 secara nyata memilikikonduktivitas yang lebih tinggi (15,750) dari Tipe Coating 4.
(d) Hasil uji LSD dapat dilihat pada jawaban butir b, yaitu Tipe Coating 2 secara nyatamenghasilkan konduktivitas yang lebih tinggi dari Tipe Coating3 dan 4, tetapi tidak berbeda
nyata dengan Tipe Coating1.
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
8/36
8
(e) Dengan menggunakan grafik dapat dilihat bahwa Tipe Coating2 menghasilkan konduktivitas
yang paling tinggi. Hal ini juga dibuktikan dengan uji lanjut (Post Hoc Tests) yangmenunjukkan bahwa Tipe Coating 2 secara nyata menghasilkan konduktivitas yang lebih
tinggi dari Tipe Coating3 dan 4.
(f) Rekomendasi yang disampaikan adalah tetap menggunakan Tipe Coating 4 karena memiliki
konduktivitas paling rendah.
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
9/36
9
Jawaban 3.8
Descriptives
Strength
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Minimum MaximumLower Bound Upper Bound
10 3 1500.00 51.962 30.000 1370.92 1629.08 1440 1530
15 3 1586.67 77.675 44.845 1393.71 1779.62 1500 1650
20 3 1606.67 107.858 62.272 1338.73 1874.60 1530 1730
25 3 1500.00 10.000 5.774 1475.16 1524.84 1490 1510
Total 12 1548.33 79.525 22.957 1497.81 1598.86 1440 1730
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Strength
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
4.253 3 8 .045
ANOVA
Strength
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 28633.333 3 9544.444 1.865 .214
Within Groups 40933.333 8 5116.667
Total 69566.667 11
Post Hoc Tests
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
10/36
10
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable:Strength
(I)Rodding
(J)Rodding
Mean Difference(I-J) Std. Error Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Tukey HSD 10 15 -86.667 58.405 .488 -273.70 100.37
20 -106.667 58.405 .329 -293.70 80.37
25 .000 58.405 1.000 -187.03 187.03
15 10 86.667 58.405 .488 -100.37 273.70
20 -20.000 58.405 .985 -207.03 167.03
25 86.667 58.405 .488 -100.37 273.70
20 10 106.667 58.405 .329 -80.37 293.70
15 20.000 58.405 .985 -167.03 207.03
25 106.667 58.405 .329 -80.37 293.70
25 10 .000 58.405 1.000 -187.03 187.03
15 -86.667 58.405 .488 -273.70 100.37
20 -106.667 58.405 .329 -293.70 80.37
LSD 10 15 -86.667 58.405 .176 -221.35 48.01
20 -106.667 58.405 .105 -241.35 28.01
25 .000 58.405 1.000 -134.68 134.68
15 10 86.667 58.405 .176 -48.01 221.35
20 -20.000 58.405 .741 -154.68 114.68
25 86.667 58.405 .176 -48.01 221.35
20 10 106.667 58.405 .105 -28.01 241.35
15 20.000 58.405 .741 -114.68 154.68
25 106.667 58.405 .105 -28.01 241.35
25 10 .000 58.405 1.000 -134.68 134.68
15 -86.667 58.405 .176 -221.35 48.01
20 -106.667 58.405 .105 -241.35 28.01
Homogeneous Subsets
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
11/36
11
Strength
Rodding N
Subset for alpha= 0.05
1
Tukey HSDa 10 3 1500.00
25 3 1500.0015 3 1586.67
20 3 1606.67
Sig. .329
Duncana 10 3 1500.00
25 3 1500.00
15 3 1586.67
20 3 1606.67
Sig. .124
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are
displayed.a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.000.
Jawaban 3.9
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
12/36
12
Descriptives
RadReleased
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Minimum MaximumLower Bound Upper Bound
0.37 4 82.75 2.062 1.031 79.47 86.03 80 85
0.51 4 77.00 2.309 1.155 73.33 80.67 75 79
0.71 4 75.00 1.826 .913 72.09 77.91 73 77
1.02 4 71.75 3.304 1.652 66.49 77.01 67 74
1.40 4 65.00 3.559 1.780 59.34 70.66 62 69
1.99 4 62.75 2.754 1.377 58.37 67.13 60 66
Total 24 72.38 7.418 1.514 69.24 75.51 60 85
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
RadReleased
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
1.243 5 18 .330
Post Hoc Tests
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
13/36
13
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable:RadReleased
(I)OrifDiameter
(J)OrifDiameter
Mean Difference(I-J) Std. Error Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Tukey HSD 0.37 0.51 5.750 1.917 .071 -.34 11.84
0.71 7.750* 1.917 .008 1.66 13.84
1.02 11.000* 1.917 .000 4.91 17.09
1.40 17.750* 1.917 .000 11.66 23.84
1.99 20.000* 1.917 .000 13.91 26.09
0.51 0.37 -5.750 1.917 .071 -11.84 .34
0.71 2.000 1.917 .897 -4.09 8.09
1.02 5.250 1.917 .115 -.84 11.34
1.40 12.000* 1.917 .000 5.91 18.09
1.99 14.250* 1.917 .000 8.16 20.34
0.71 0.37 -7.750* 1.917 .008 -13.84 -1.66
0.51 -2.000 1.917 .897 -8.09 4.09
1.02 3.250 1.917 .551 -2.84 9.34
1.40 10.000* 1.917 .001 3.91 16.09
1.99 12.250* 1.917 .000 6.16 18.34
1.02 0.37 -11.000* 1.917 .000 -17.09 -4.91
0.51 -5.250 1.917 .115 -11.34 .84
0.71 -3.250 1.917 .551 -9.34 2.84
1.40 6.750* 1.917 .025 .66 12.84
1.99 9.000* 1.917 .002 2.91 15.09
1.40 0.37 -17.750* 1.917 .000 -23.84 -11.66
0.51 -12.000* 1.917 .000 -18.09 -5.91
0.71 -10.000* 1.917 .001 -16.09 -3.91
1.02 -6.750* 1.917 .025 -12.84 -.66
1.99 2.250 1.917 .843 -3.84 8.34
1.99 0.37 -20.000* 1.917 .000 -26.09 -13.91
0.51 -14.250* 1.917 .000 -20.34 -8.16
0.71 -12.250* 1.917 .000 -18.34 -6.16
1.02 -9.000* 1.917 .002 -15.09 -2.91
1.40 -2.250 1.917 .843 -8.34 3.84
LSD 0.37 0.51 5.750* 1.917 .008 1.72 9.78
0.71 7.750* 1.917 .001 3.72 11.78
1.02 11.000* 1.917 .000 6.97 15.03
1.40 17.750* 1.917 .000 13.72 21.78
1.99 20.000* 1.917 .000 15.97 24.03
0.51 0.37 -5.750* 1.917 .008 -9.78 -1.72
0.71 2.000 1.917 .311 -2.03 6.03
1.02 5.250* 1.917 .013 1.22 9.28
1.40 12.000* 1.917 .000 7.97 16.03
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
14/36
14
Homogeneous Subsets
RadReleased
OrifDiameter N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2 3 4
Tukey HSDa 1.99 4 62.75
1.40 4 65.00
1.02 4 71.75
0.71 4 75.00
0.51 4 77.00 77.00
0.37 4 82.75
Sig. .843 .115 .071
Duncana 1.99 4 62.75
1.40 4 65.00
1.02 4 71.75
0.71 4 75.00 75.00
0.51 4 77.00
0.37 4 82.75
Sig. .256 .107 .311 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 4.000.
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
15/36
15
Jawaban 3.10
Descriptives
ResponTime
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Minimum MaximumLower Bound Upper Bound
Satu 5 10.80 2.775 1.241 7.35 14.25 8 15
Dua 5 22.20 4.868 2.177 16.16 28.24 17 30
Tiga 5 8.40 4.393 1.965 2.95 13.85 5 16
Total 15 13.80 7.302 1.885 9.76 17.84 5 30
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
ResponTime
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
.347 2 12 .714
ANOVA
ResponTime
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 543.600 2 271.800 16.083 .000
Within Groups 202.800 12 16.900
Total 746.400 14
Post Hoc Tests
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable:ResponTime
(I)CircuitType
(J)CircuitType
Mean Difference(I-J) Std. Error Sig.
99% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Tukey HSD Satu Dua -11.400* 2.600 .002 -20.68 -2.12
Tiga 2.400 2.600 .637 -6.88 11.68
Dua Satu 11.400* 2.600 .002 2.12 20.68
Tiga 13.800* 2.600 .001 4.52 23.08
Tiga Satu -2.400 2.600 .637 -11.68 6.88
Dua -13.800* 2.600 .001 -23.08 -4.52
LSD Satu Dua -11.400* 2.600 .001 -19.34 -3.46
Tiga 2.400 2.600 .374 -5.54 10.34
Dua Satu 11.400* 2.600 .001 3.46 19.34
Tiga 13.800* 2.600 .000 5.86 21.74
Tiga Satu -2.400 2.600 .374 -10.34 5.54
Dua -13.800* 2.600 .000 -21.74 -5.86
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.01 level.
Homogeneous Subsets
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
16/36
16
ResponTime
CircuitType N
Subset for alpha = 0.01
1 2
Tukey HSDa Tiga 5 8.40
Satu 5 10.80
Dua 5 22.20
Sig. .637 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 5.000.
Jawaban 3.11
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
17/36
17
Descriptives
Lifeat35kV
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Minimum MaximumLower Bound Upper Bound
Satu 6 18.650 1.9522 .7970 16.601 20.699 16.3 21.6
Dua 6 17.950 1.8545 .7571 16.004 19.896 15.3 20.3
Tiga 6 20.950 1.8791 .7671 18.978 22.922 18.5 23.6
Empat 6 18.817 1.5549 .6348 17.185 20.448 16.9 21.1
Total 24 19.092 2.0447 .4174 18.228 19.955 15.3 23.6
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Lifeat35kV
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
.146 3 20 .931
ANOVALifeat35kV
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 30.165 3 10.055 3.047 .052
Within Groups 65.993 20 3.300
Total 96.158 23
Post Hoc Tests
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
18/36
18
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable:Lifeat35kV
(I)FluidType
(J)FluidType
Mean Difference(I-J) Std. Error Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Tukey HSD Satu Dua .7000 1.0488 .908 -2.235 3.635
Tiga -2.3000 1.0488 .159 -5.235 .635
Empat -.1667 1.0488 .999 -3.102 2.769
Dua Satu -.7000 1.0488 .908 -3.635 2.235
Tiga -3.0000* 1.0488 .044 -5.935 -.065
Empat -.8667 1.0488 .841 -3.802 2.069
Tiga Satu 2.3000 1.0488 .159 -.635 5.235
Dua 3.0000* 1.0488 .044 .065 5.935
Empat 2.1333 1.0488 .209 -.802 5.069
Empat Satu .1667 1.0488 .999 -2.769 3.102
Dua .8667 1.0488 .841 -2.069 3.802
Tiga -2.1333 1.0488 .209 -5.069 .802
Bonferroni Satu Dua .7000 1.0488 1.000 -2.370 3.770
Tiga -2.3000 1.0488 .242 -5.370 .770
Empat -.1667 1.0488 1.000 -3.237 2.903
Dua Satu -.7000 1.0488 1.000 -3.770 2.370
Tiga -3.0000 1.0488 .058 -6.070 .070
Empat -.8667 1.0488 1.000 -3.937 2.203
Tiga Satu 2.3000 1.0488 .242 -.770 5.370
Dua 3.0000 1.0488 .058 -.070 6.070
Empat 2.1333 1.0488 .332 -.937 5.203
Empat Satu .1667 1.0488 1.000 -2.903 3.237
Dua .8667 1.0488 1.000 -2.203 3.937
Tiga -2.1333 1.0488 .332 -5.203 .937
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Homogeneous Subsets
Lifeat35kV
FluidTyp
e N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2Tukey HSDa Dua 6 17.950
Satu 6 18.650 18.650
Empat 6 18.817 18.817
Tiga 6 20.950
Sig. .841 .159
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
19/36
19
Jawaban 3.12
Descriptives
Noise
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Minimum MaximumLower Bound Upper Bound
Satu 5 19.20 7.791 3.484 9.53 28.87 8 30
Dua 5 70.00 11.023 4.930 56.31 83.69 56 80
Tiga 5 36.60 11.589 5.183 22.21 50.99 25 50
Empat 5 79.80 20.511 9.173 54.33 105.27 46 97
Total 20 51.40 28.089 6.281 38.25 64.55 8 97
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Noise
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
1.294 3 16 .311
ANOVA
Noise
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 12042.000 3 4014.000 21.780 .000
Within Groups 2948.800 16 184.300
Total 14990.800 19
Post Hoc Tests
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
20/36
20
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable:Noise
(I)CircuitDesign
(J)CircuitDesign
Mean Difference(I-J) Std. Error Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Tukey HSD Satu Dua -50.800* 8.586 .000 -75.36 -26.24
Tiga -17.400 8.586 .219 -41.96 7.16
Empat -60.600* 8.586 .000 -85.16 -36.04
Dua Satu 50.800* 8.586 .000 26.24 75.36
Tiga 33.400* 8.586 .006 8.84 57.96
Empat -9.800 8.586 .670 -34.36 14.76
Tiga Satu 17.400 8.586 .219 -7.16 41.96
Dua -33.400* 8.586 .006 -57.96 -8.84
Empat -43.200* 8.586 .001 -67.76 -18.64
Empat Satu 60.600* 8.586 .000 36.04 85.16
Dua 9.800 8.586 .670 -14.76 34.36
Tiga 43.200* 8.586 .001 18.64 67.76
Bonferroni Satu Dua -50.800* 8.586 .000 -76.63 -24.97
Tiga -17.400 8.586 .358 -43.23 8.43
Empat -60.600* 8.586 .000 -86.43 -34.77
Dua Satu 50.800* 8.586 .000 24.97 76.63
Tiga 33.400* 8.586 .008 7.57 59.23
Empat -9.800 8.586 1.000 -35.63 16.03
Tiga Satu 17.400 8.586 .358 -8.43 43.23
Dua -33.400* 8.586 .008 -59.23 -7.57
Empat -43.200* 8.586 .001 -69.03 -17.37
Empat Satu 60.600* 8.586 .000 34.77 86.43
Dua 9.800 8.586 1.000 -16.03 35.63
Tiga 43.200* 8.586 .001 17.37 69.03
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Homogeneous Subsets
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
21/36
21
Noise
CircuitDesign N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2
Tukey HSDa Satu 5 19.20
Tiga 5 36.60
Dua 5 70.00
Empat 5 79.80
Sig. .219 .670
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 5.000.
Jawaban 3.13
Descriptives
MethAlcohol
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Minimum MaximumLower Bound Upper Bound
Satu 3 84.4700 .48135 .27791 83.2743 85.6657 84.04 84.99
Dua 3 85.0533 .15044 .08686 84.6796 85.4271 84.88 85.15
Tiga 3 84.7867 .34487 .19911 83.9300 85.6434 84.48 85.16
Empat 3 84.2833 .23629 .13642 83.6964 84.8703 84.10 84.55
Total 12 84.6483 .41591 .12006 84.3841 84.9126 84.04 85.16
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
MethAlcoholLevene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
1.336 3 8 .329
ANOVA
MethAlcohol
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 1.045 3 .348 3.246 .081
Within Groups .858 8 .107
Total 1.903 11
Post Hoc Tests
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
22/36
22
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable:MethAlcohol
(I)Chemist
(J)Chemist
Mean Difference(I-J) Std. Error Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Tukey HSD Satu Dua -.58333 .26743 .208 -1.4397 .2731
Tiga -.31667 .26743 .653 -1.1731 .5397
Empat .18667 .26743 .895 -.6697 1.0431
Dua Satu .58333 .26743 .208 -.2731 1.4397
Tiga .26667 .26743 .755 -.5897 1.1231
Empat .77000 .26743 .079 -.0864 1.6264
Tiga Satu .31667 .26743 .653 -.5397 1.1731
Dua -.26667 .26743 .755 -1.1231 .5897
Empat .50333 .26743 .307 -.3531 1.3597
Empat Satu -.18667 .26743 .895 -1.0431 .6697
Dua -.77000 .26743 .079 -1.6264 .0864
Tiga -.50333 .26743 .307 -1.3597 .3531
Bonferroni Satu Dua -.58333 .26743 .364 -1.5137 .3470
Tiga -.31667 .26743 1.000 -1.2470 .6137
Empat .18667 .26743 1.000 -.7437 1.1170
Dua Satu .58333 .26743 .364 -.3470 1.5137
Tiga .26667 .26743 1.000 -.6637 1.1970
Empat .77000 .26743 .123 -.1603 1.7003
Tiga Satu .31667 .26743 1.000 -.6137 1.2470
Dua -.26667 .26743 1.000 -1.1970 .6637
Empat .50333 .26743 .580 -.4270 1.4337
Empat Satu -.18667 .26743 1.000 -1.1170 .7437
Dua -.77000 .26743 .123 -1.7003 .1603
Tiga -.50333 .26743 .580 -1.4337 .4270
Homogeneous Subsets
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
23/36
23
MethAlcohol
Chemist N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1
Tukey HSDa Empat 3 84.2833
Satu 3 84.4700
Tiga 3 84.7867
Dua 3 85.0533
Sig. .079
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.000.
Jawaban 3.14
Descriptives
Weekslife
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Minimum MaximumLower Bound Upper Bound
Brand1 5 95.20 3.347 1.497 91.04 99.36 92 100
Brand2 5 79.40 3.847 1.720 74.62 84.18 75 84
Brand3 5 100.40 4.561 2.040 94.74 106.06 96 108
Total 15 91.67 9.940 2.567 86.16 97.17 75 108
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Weekslife
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
.092 2 12 .912
ANOVA
Weekslife
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 1196.133 2 598.067 38.338 .000
Within Groups 187.200 12 15.600
Total 1383.333 14
Post Hoc Tests
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
24/36
24
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable:Weekslife
(I) Brand (J) BrandMean Difference
(I-J) Std. Error Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Tukey HSD Brand1 Brand2 15.800* 2.498 .000 9.14 22.46
Brand3 -5.200 2.498 .136 -11.86 1.46
Brand2 Brand1 -15.800* 2.498 .000 -22.46 -9.14
Brand3 -21.000* 2.498 .000 -27.66 -14.34
Brand3 Brand1 5.200 2.498 .136 -1.46 11.86
Brand2 21.000* 2.498 .000 14.34 27.66
Bonferroni Brand1 Brand2 15.800* 2.498 .000 8.86 22.74
Brand3 -5.200 2.498 .178 -12.14 1.74
Brand2 Brand1 -15.800* 2.498 .000 -22.74 -8.86
Brand3 -21.000* 2.498 .000 -27.94 -14.06
Brand3 Brand1 5.200 2.498 .178 -1.74 12.14
Brand2 21.000* 2.498 .000 14.06 27.94
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Homogeneous Subsets
Weekslife
Brand N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2
Tukey HSDa Brand2 5 79.40
Brand1 5 95.20
Brand3 5 100.40
Sig. 1.000 .136
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 5.000.
Interval Kepercayaan 99%
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
25/36
25
Descriptives
Weekslife
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Minimum MaximumLower Bound Upper Bound
Brand1 5 95.20 3.347 1.497 91.04 99.36 92 100
Brand2 5 79.40 3.847 1.720 74.62 84.18 75 84
Brand3 5 100.40 4.561 2.040 94.74 106.06 96 108
Total 15 91.67 9.940 2.567 86.16 97.17 75 108
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Weekslife
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
.092 2 12 .912
ANOVAWeekslife
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 1196.133 2 598.067 38.338 .000
Within Groups 187.200 12 15.600
Total 1383.333 14
Post Hoc Tests
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable:Weekslife
(I) Brand (J) BrandMean Difference
(I-J) Std. Error Sig.
99% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Tukey HSD Brand1 Brand2 15.800* 2.498 .000 6.89 24.71
Brand3 -5.200 2.498 .136 -14.11 3.71
Brand2 Brand1 -15.800* 2.498 .000 -24.71 -6.89
Brand3 -21.000* 2.498 .000 -29.91 -12.09
Brand3 Brand1 5.200 2.498 .136 -3.71 14.11
Brand2 21.000* 2.498 .000 12.09 29.91
Bonferroni Brand1 Brand2 15.800* 2.498 .000 6.69 24.91
Brand3 -5.200 2.498 .178 -14.31 3.91
Brand2 Brand1 -15.800* 2.498 .000 -24.91 -6.69
Brand3 -21.000* 2.498 .000 -30.11 -11.89
Brand3 Brand1 5.200 2.498 .178 -3.91 14.31
Brand2 21.000* 2.498 .000 11.89 30.11
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.01 level.
Homogeneous Subsets
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
26/36
26
Weekslife
Brand N
Subset for alpha = 0.01
1 2
Tukey HSDa Brand2 5 79.40
Brand1 5 95.20
Brand3 5 100.40
Sig. 1.000 .136
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 5.000.
Jawaban 3.15
Descriptives
Effect
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Minimum MaximumLower Bound Upper Bound
Catalyst1 5 56.900 1.5199 .6797 55.013 58.787 54.9 58.4
Catalyst2 4 55.775 1.0996 .5498 54.025 57.525 54.5 57.0
Catalyst3 3 53.233 2.7791 1.6045 46.330 60.137 50.1 55.4
Catalyst4 4 51.125 1.4431 .7215 48.829 53.421 49.9 52.9
Total 16 54.488 2.8312 .7078 52.979 55.996 49.9 58.4
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Effect
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
2.054 3 12 .160
ANOVA
Effect
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 85.676 3 28.559 9.916 .001
Within Groups 34.562 12 2.880
Total 120.237 15
Post Hoc Tests
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
27/36
27
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable:Effect
(I) Catalyst (J) CatalystMean Difference
(I-J) Std. Error Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Tukey HSD Catalyst1 Catalyst2 1.1250 1.1384 .759 -2.255 4.505
Catalyst3 3.6667 1.2394 .051 -.013 7.346
Catalyst4 5.7750* 1.1384 .001 2.395 9.155
Catalyst2 Catalyst1 -1.1250 1.1384 .759 -4.505 2.255
Catalyst3 2.5417 1.2962 .255 -1.307 6.390
Catalyst4 4.6500* 1.2000 .010 1.087 8.213
Catalyst3 Catalyst1 -3.6667 1.2394 .051 -7.346 .013
Catalyst2 -2.5417 1.2962 .255 -6.390 1.307
Catalyst4 2.1083 1.2962 .401 -1.740 5.957
Catalyst4 Catalyst1 -5.7750* 1.1384 .001 -9.155 -2.395
Catalyst2 -4.6500* 1.2000 .010 -8.213 -1.087
Catalyst3 -2.1083 1.2962 .401 -5.957 1.740
Bonferroni Catalyst1 Catalyst2 1.1250 1.1384 1.000 -2.464 4.714
Catalyst3 3.6667 1.2394 .072 -.241 7.574
Catalyst4 5.7750* 1.1384 .002 2.186 9.364
Catalyst2 Catalyst1 -1.1250 1.1384 1.000 -4.714 2.464
Catalyst3 2.5417 1.2962 .441 -1.545 6.628
Catalyst4 4.6500* 1.2000 .013 .867 8.433
Catalyst3 Catalyst1 -3.6667 1.2394 .072 -7.574 .241
Catalyst2 -2.5417 1.2962 .441 -6.628 1.545
Catalyst4 2.1083 1.2962 .779 -1.978 6.195
Catalyst4 Catalyst1 -5.7750* 1.1384 .002 -9.364 -2.186
Catalyst2 -4.6500* 1.2000 .013 -8.433 -.867
Catalyst3 -2.1083 1.2962 .779 -6.195 1.978
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Homogeneous Subsets
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
28/36
28
Effect
Catalyst N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2 3
Tukey HSDa Catalyst4 4 51.125
Catalyst3 3 53.233 53.233
Catalyst2 4 55.775 55.775
Catalyst1 5 56.900
Sig. .352 .213 .794
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.871.
Interval Kepercayaan 99%
Descriptives
Effect
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Minimum MaximumLower Bound Upper Bound
Catalyst1 5 56.900 1.5199 .6797 55.013 58.787 54.9 58.4
Catalyst2 4 55.775 1.0996 .5498 54.025 57.525 54.5 57.0
Catalyst3 3 53.233 2.7791 1.6045 46.330 60.137 50.1 55.4
Catalyst4 4 51.125 1.4431 .7215 48.829 53.421 49.9 52.9
Total 16 54.488 2.8312 .7078 52.979 55.996 49.9 58.4
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Effect
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
2.054 3 12 .160
ANOVA
Effect
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 85.676 3 28.559 9.916 .001
Within Groups 34.562 12 2.880
Total 120.237 15
Post Hoc Tests
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
29/36
29
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable:Effect
(I) Catalyst (J) CatalystMean Difference
(I-J) Std. Error Sig.
99% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Tukey HSD Catalyst1 Catalyst2 1.1250 1.1384 .759 -3.304 5.554
Catalyst3 3.6667 1.2394 .051 -1.155 8.488
Catalyst4 5.7750* 1.1384 .001 1.346 10.204
Catalyst2 Catalyst1 -1.1250 1.1384 .759 -5.554 3.304
Catalyst3 2.5417 1.2962 .255 -2.501 7.584
Catalyst4 4.6500 1.2000 .010 -.018 9.318
Catalyst3 Catalyst1 -3.6667 1.2394 .051 -8.488 1.155
Catalyst2 -2.5417 1.2962 .255 -7.584 2.501
Catalyst4 2.1083 1.2962 .401 -2.934 7.151
Catalyst4 Catalyst1 -5.7750* 1.1384 .001 -10.204 -1.346
Catalyst2 -4.6500 1.2000 .010 -9.318 .018
Catalyst3 -2.1083 1.2962 .401 -7.151 2.934
Bonferroni Catalyst1 Catalyst2 1.1250 1.1384 1.000 -3.464 5.714
Catalyst3 3.6667 1.2394 .072 -1.329 8.662
Catalyst4 5.7750* 1.1384 .002 1.186 10.364
Catalyst2 Catalyst1 -1.1250 1.1384 1.000 -5.714 3.464
Catalyst3 2.5417 1.2962 .441 -2.683 7.766
Catalyst4 4.6500 1.2000 .013 -.187 9.487
Catalyst3 Catalyst1 -3.6667 1.2394 .072 -8.662 1.329
Catalyst2 -2.5417 1.2962 .441 -7.766 2.683
Catalyst4 2.1083 1.2962 .779 -3.116 7.333
Catalyst4 Catalyst1 -5.7750* 1.1384 .002 -10.364 -1.186
Catalyst2 -4.6500 1.2000 .013 -9.487 .187
Catalyst3 -2.1083 1.2962 .779 -7.333 3.116
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.01 level.
Homogeneous Subsets
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
30/36
30
Effect
Catalyst N
Subset for alpha = 0.01
1 2
Tukey HSDa Catalyst4 4 51.125
Catalyst3 3 53.233 53.233
Catalyst2 4 55.775 55.775
Catalyst1 5 56.900
Sig. .011 .047
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.871.
Jawaban 3.16
Descriptives
FailureTime
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Minimum MaximumLower Bound Upper Bound
Material1 4 159.75 36.463 18.232 101.73 217.77 110 194
Material2 4 6.25 7.932 3.966 -6.37 18.87 1 18
Material3 4 2941.75 2201.406 1100.703 -561.18 6444.68 880 5276
Material4 4 5723.00 3998.435 1999.218 -639.40 12085.40 495 10050
Material5 4 10.75 12.339 6.169 -8.88 30.38 2 29
Total 20 1768.30 2953.117 660.337 386.20 3150.40 1 10050
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
FailureTime
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
6.313 4 15 .003
ANOVA
FailureTime
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 1.032E8 4 2.580E7 6.191 .004Within Groups 6.251E7 15 4167043.800
Total 1.657E8 19
Post Hoc Tests
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
31/36
31
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable:FailureTime
(I) Material (J) MaterialMean Difference
(I-J) Std. Error Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Tukey HSD Material1 Material2 153.500 1443.441 1.000 -4303.74 4610.74
Material3 -2782.000 1443.441 .345 -7239.24 1675.24
Material4 -5563.250* 1443.441 .012 -10020.49 -1106.01
Material5 149.000 1443.441 1.000 -4308.24 4606.24
Material2 Material1 -153.500 1443.441 1.000 -4610.74 4303.74
Material3 -2935.500 1443.441 .297 -7392.74 1521.74
Material4 -5716.750* 1443.441 .009 -10173.99 -1259.51
Material5 -4.500 1443.441 1.000 -4461.74 4452.74
Material3 Material1 2782.000 1443.441 .345 -1675.24 7239.24
Material2 2935.500 1443.441 .297 -1521.74 7392.74
Material4 -2781.250 1443.441 .346 -7238.49 1675.99
Material5 2931.000 1443.441 .299 -1526.24 7388.24
Material4 Material1 5563.250* 1443.441 .012 1106.01 10020.49
Material2 5716.750* 1443.441 .009 1259.51 10173.99
Material3 2781.250 1443.441 .346 -1675.99 7238.49
Material5 5712.250* 1443.441 .009 1255.01 10169.49
Material5 Material1 -149.000 1443.441 1.000 -4606.24 4308.24
Material2 4.500 1443.441 1.000 -4452.74 4461.74
Material3 -2931.000 1443.441 .299 -7388.24 1526.24
Material4 -5712.250* 1443.441 .009 -10169.49 -1255.01
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Homogeneous Subsets
FailureTime
Material N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2
Tukey HSDa Material2 4 6.25
Material5 4 10.75
Material1 4 159.75
Material3 4 2941.75 2941.75
Material4 4 5723.00
Sig. .297 .346
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 4.000.
Jawaban 3.17
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
32/36
32
Descriptives
ParticleCount
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Minimum MaximumLower Bound Upper Bound
Method1 5 13.40 12.462 5.573 -2.07 28.87 1 3
Method2 5 38.20 14.567 6.515 20.11 56.29 24 6
Method3 5 73.00 36.490 16.319 27.69 118.31 27 12
Total 15 41.53 33.551 8.663 22.95 60.11 1 12
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
ParticleCount
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
3.844 2 12 .051
ANOVA
ParticleCountSum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 8963.733 2 4481.867 7.914 .006
Within Groups 6796.000 12 566.333
Total 15759.733 14
Post Hoc Tests
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable:ParticleCount
(I) Method (J) MethodMean Difference
(I-J) Std. Error Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Tukey HSD Method1 Method2 -24.800 15.051 .264 -64.95 15.35
Method3 -59.600* 15.051 .005 -99.75 -19.45
Method2 Method1 24.800 15.051 .264 -15.35 64.95
Method3 -34.800 15.051 .092 -74.95 5.35
Method3 Method1 59.600* 15.051 .005 19.45 99.75
Method2 34.800 15.051 .092 -5.35 74.95
Bonferroni Method1 Method2 -24.800 15.051 .376 -66.63 17.03
Method3 -59.600* 15.051 .006 -101.43 -17.77
Method2 Method1 24.800 15.051 .376 -17.03 66.63
Method3 -34.800 15.051 .118 -76.63 7.03
Method3 Method1 59.600* 15.051 .006 17.77 101.43
Method2 34.800 15.051 .118 -7.03 76.63
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Homogeneous Subsets
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
33/36
33
ParticleCount
Method N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2
Tukey HSDa Method1 5 13.40
Method2 5 38.20 38.20
Method3 5 73.00
Sig. .264 .092
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 5.000.
Jawaban 3.30
Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N
FeedRate 1 FeedRate10 5
2 FeedRate12 5
3 FeedRate14 5
4 FeedRate16 5
ProductionRun 1 ProductionRun1 4
2 ProductionRun2 4
3 ProductionRun3 4
4 ProductionRun4 4
5 ProductionRun5 4
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Dependent Variable:Dimension
SourceType III Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model .008a 2 .004 2.862 .085
Intercept .011 1 .011 7.736 .013
FeedRate .007 1 .007 5.148 .037
ProductionRun .001 1 .001 .577 .458
FeedRate * ProductionRun .011 12 .001 . .
Error .024 17 .001
Total .250 20Corrected Total .032 19
a. R Squared = .252 (Adjusted R Squared = .164)
Jawaban 4.13
Univariate Analysis of Variance
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
34/36
34
Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N
Distance 1 Distance4 5
2 Distance6 5
3 Distance8 5
4 Distance10 5
Subject 1 Subject1 4
2 Subject2 4
3 Subject3 4
4 Subject4 4
5 Subject5 4
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Dependent Variable:FocusTime
SourceType III Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model 42.490a 2 21.245 8.587 .003
Intercept 164.743 1 164.743 66.587 .000
Distance 28.090 1 28.090 11.354 .004
Subject 14.400 1 14.400 5.820 .027
Distance * Subject 15.300 12 1.275 . .
Error 42.060 17 2.474
Total 555.000 20
Corrected Total 84.550 19
a. R Squared = 1.000 (Adjusted R Squared = .)
Jawaban 4.14
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
35/36
35
Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N
Batch 1 Batch1 5
2 Batch2 5
3 Batch3 5
4 Batch4 5
5 Batch5 5
Day 1 Day1 5
2 Day2 5
3 Day3 5
4 Day4 5
5 Day5 5
Ingredient 1 IngredientA 5
2 IngredientB 5
3 IngredientC 5
4 IngredientD 5
5 IngredientE 5
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Dependent Variable:ReactionTime
SourceType III Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model 79.580a 3 26.527 4.384 .015
Intercept 156.917 1 156.917 25.935 .000
Batch .180 1 .180 .030 .865
Day .020 1 .020 .003 .955
Ingredient 79.380 1 79.380 13.120 .002
Batch * Day .000 0 . . .
Batch * Ingredient .000 0 . . .
Day * Ingredient .000 0 . . .
Batch * Day * Ingredient .000 0 . . .
Error 127.060 21 6.050
Total 1071.000 25
Corrected Total 206.640 24
a. R Squared = .385 (Adjusted R Squared = .297)
7/28/2019 00-Jawaban Desain Dan Analisis Eksperimen 3.4 - 3.30
36/36
36
JAWABAN LATIHAN CHAPTER 3 DAN 4
TUGAS MATA KULIAHDESAIN DAN ANALISIS EKSPERIMEN
Dosen: Dr. Suparman I.A., M.Sc.
Oleh:
Vera AsdayantiNPM 20127270104
PROGRAM STUDI MATEMATIKA DAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN ALAMPROGRAM PASCASARJANA
UNIVERSITAS INDRAPRASTA PGRI2013