Upload
sanjeev
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/21/2019 01 Initial Patient Assessment.pdf
1/13
KEY
POIN
TS
Open questions rather than
closed ones should be used
to encourage each patient to
provide as much information
as possible
All aspects of the subjective
and objective questioning
and examination should be
conducted with a clear idea
of how the information will
either assist in the choice
of lens or help in the future
monitoring of the contact
lens wearer
Throughout the examination,
the patent should be kept
informed of the proceduresbeing conducted and the
reasons for any decisions.
An informed patient is a
better patient
KEY POINTS
1
Public awareness of the benefits of contact
lens correction is arguably higher today than at
any time in history, thanks largely to advertising
and public relations. And significant advanc-
es in contact lens technology, materials and
design mean that more patients can comfortably
wear contact lenses. Yet despite these factors,
the number of contact lens wearers in Europe
remains significantly less than in the US, Japan
or much of the Pacific Rim. There are two main
factors keeping this penetration to the low levels.
Firstly, there is a lack of proactive recommendation
by eye care practitioners and, secondly, there
is a high incidence of contact lens drop-outs.
Correct patient selection and pre-screening is a
key element in addressing both these issues.
InitialPatient
Assessment
Essential Contact Lens Practice
8/21/2019 01 Initial Patient Assessment.pdf
2/13
E N V I R O N M E N T L E N S T Y P E
S O F T H A R D
Metal splinters ++ -
Burning grit particle s ++ -
Particl e contamination, moderate + -
Particl e contamination, heavy - -
Strong infra-re d radiation - ?
Underwa ter, splashes +- +-
Dry environments +- +-
Extreme cold + +
Solvents, gases, short exposure ++ ++
Solvent s, gases, long exposur e ? ?
Acids, strong, splashes ++ ++
Acids, weaker, splashes ++ ++Alkalis, strong, splashes +- ?
Alkalis, weaker, splashes +- ++
T
ABLE
1
Influence of contact lenses in different environments5
Initial Patient Assessment
2
he initial patient selection for contact lenses must bemade in conjunction with the patient in the contextof explaining to them that contact lenses could be a
viable vision correction option. Several studies conrm that
proactive contact lens prescribing introduces contact lens wearto patients who previously assumed they were unsuitable. 1,2
Market research continues to show the number one concernof most patients is the perceived discomfort/fear of having alens on the eye. The challenge facing practitioners is to matchthese physiological and emotional needs to products.
Although ocular topography is rarely a barrier to moderncontact lenses, ocular anomalies, pathology and patientmotivation remain signicant factors restricting the numberof contact lens wearers. Many of the factors should, and can, be
screened for at the initial tting. Beyond the desire to increasethe number of patients successfully wearing contact lenses,the practitioner has ethical and legal obligations. Patientsmust be oered the most suitable and safe correction for theirneeds and practitioners must ensure their records clearly notepre-assessment and assessmentbaseline measurements of thecontact lens wearer. The need to communicate with the patientis heightened with the increasing choice in materials, designsand replacement frequencies available. The practitioner hasan ethical obligation to inform patients of any new material,
modality or lens design that could improve their wearingsuccess. Failure to do so could result in legal issues shouldthe patient later have problems with their lenses. It alsoensures that practitioners are seen to be up to date with newdevelopments.
T
++ certain protection
+ makes no differ ence+- possibly unfavourable
- unfavourabl e
? not fully studied
8/21/2019 01 Initial Patient Assessment.pdf
3/13
3
Essential Contact Lens Practice
Aftercare begins before the rst contact lens is even placed onthe eye. Patient selection and pre-screening thus become partof the aftercare process.
InstrumentationPre-screening contact lens wearers requires three basictechniques: observation, measurement and communication.The key instruments the slit lamp and the keratometer are discussed in detail in other articles in this series. However, afew pertinent points relating to pre-assessment are mentionedhere.
Ideally, the slit lamp should be tted with an eyepiecegraticule, or at least have an adjustable slit height to assist in
recording both the size of lesions in the anterior segment andmeasurements of horizontal visible iris diameter (HVID) andpupil size. Measurement using the graticule is ideal as it iseasy and accurate. The crude technique of using a hand-heldruler is not to be recommended. Problems of parallax, vertexdistance and lack of divisions on the millimetre scale reduceaccuracy and reliability.
Baseline measurements and initial assessment of ocular tissueappearance can be more accurate and repeatable by using
grading scales such as the IER (Figure 1), or Efron grading
scale.3
The increased accessibility of digital photographyshould also be considered in taking base line measurements.Use of a photographic slit lamp enables the practitionerto photograph any pre-existing lesion so that this can becompared with any subsequent changes. Consideration mustalso be given to the keratometer as more than an instrumentsolely for measuring corneal radius. The keratometer can beused to measure non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT) of thetear lm, well established as a more accurate record of tearlm stability than the use of uorescein.
TechniquesAs in refraction, it is important that a standard routine isfollowed during the contact lens screening examination.Developing a routine ensures a full procedure is carried outeciently. While there are no hard and fast rules as to theorder of a routine, it is customary to start with the patientdiscussion before moving on to the preliminary examination.
Patient discussion
Initial discussions with the patient are arguably the singlemost important aspect of a preliminary examination. Acorrect understanding of the patients working environmentand lifestyle is important, as well as an understanding of thepatients vision requirements and expectations.
FIGURE 1 Institute for Eye Research(IER) photographic scales
FIGURE 2Corneal desiccationsecondary to incomplete blinking
8/21/2019 01 Initial Patient Assessment.pdf
4/13
Initial Patient Assessment
4
With presbyopic vision correction any option will have itslimitations, so an informal discussion about the patientsneeds will assist in choosing the most suitable option. Forexample, the benets of gaze independent vision oered by
simultaneous vision contact lenses may outweigh any smallreduction in vision clarity. Establishing this before tting
will save both practitioner and patient considerable time andmoney. Each piece of information gathered at this stage shouldbe collected with a purpose and should help the practitionerdecide which contact lens is best for the patient.
Before considering individual aspects of the history andsymptoms, it is worth underlining the importance ofquestioning technique. Questions can be dened as openor closed. A closed question for example, Is your general
health good? is less likely to get a comprehensive responsethan an open question such as: Tell me about your generalhealth. The second question invites the patient to divulgeinformation, whereas a negative answer to the rst requiresmore probing by the practitioner.
An even better approach would be: How would you describeyour general health? This is important to help me decidewhich lenses are most suitable for your eyes. This explainswhy the practitioner needs the information and is more likelyto prompt a full answer.
Eective communication also relies on responsive listeningand appropriate body language on the part of the practitioner.It is critical that the practitioner looks interested in hearing
what the patient has to say. Studies have shown that, onaverage, it takes a patient 90 seconds to fully explain whythey are visiting a surgeon. On average, the surgeon interruptsafter just 18.4 The practitioner should maintain eye contact
whenever possible. Notes should be made in a deliberate andconsidered manner, and if there is ambiguity about a pointthen the practitioner needs to stop the patient and make surethat the point is understood by both parties.
In a medical environment patients remember just 30 per centof what they hear. The practitioner must make sure that allimportant and salient points are understood by the patient.
The main areas for consideration in patient discussions areas follows.
Occupation
In some occupations contact lens wear is not permitted, inothers it may be contraindicated. Occupational requirementscan be found from various organisations and the prospectivecontact lens wearer should be made aware of any occupationalrestrictions. Contact lenses may be contraindicated for
8/21/2019 01 Initial Patient Assessment.pdf
5/13
5
Essential Contact Lens Practice
patients working in dusty environments or environments inwhich toxic fumes are present. Consideration should also begiven to patients working long hours at computer screens.Studies have shown the blink rate reduces during computer
use, which can lead to corneal desiccation. The increase inair-conditioned oces is a further exacerbating element incontact lens dryness often associated with long term computerscreen work.
While computer use is usually not a contraindication forlens wear, the practitioner will want to ensure this doesnot become a problem by alerting users to the importanceof blinking. Many patients will put up with the discomfortassociated with oce work in the belief that there is littlethat can be done to remedy the situation. Traditionally the
options to the practitioner were largely limited to re-wettingdrops, but today the increase in choice of materials, some of
which include wetting agents, means that there are multipleways to manage contact lens dryness. Signicant dierence inpatient comfort exist when dierent lens types are used forcomputer activities.6
Recreational activities
The desire to wear contact lenses for playing sport may be animportant motivation for the potential contact lens wearer.
There are certain simple points which should be taken intoconsideration when tting a patient who wants to wear lensesfor sport.
Soft lenses are usually the rst choice for most sports andcontact sports in particular. However, while all contactlenses have some protective eect on the eye, they are not asecient as protective eyewear for some high-risk sports, suchas squash.
For water sports, the patient must be made aware of the
need for high levels of hygiene due to the potential for theincreased risk of infection. Swimming in contact lensesmay carry a higher risk of microbial keratitis and the risk ofAcanthameobakeratitis is highly associated with swimming incontact lenses. In both cases the accommodation of microbeson the lens surface during swimming is a likely cause of theinfection.7 Patients must be warned about the increasedrisk when swimming and should be advised, if they still
wish to swim in lenses, to wear tight tting goggles and payparticular attention to their lens cleaning regime or advisedaily disposable lens wear. The onus is on the practitionerto provide the patient with the information required andall patients should be informed that swimming pools, andjacuzzis in particular are higher risk environments. Contactlenses have been successfully worn for sub-aqua pursuits.8
8/21/2019 01 Initial Patient Assessment.pdf
6/13
TABLE
2O C C U L A R C H A N G E S V I S U A L P E R F O M A N C E
Decreased tonus of upper
and lower eyelids
Reduced palpebral aperture
Decreased lacrimal secretion
Reduced tear stability
Corneal changes
- decreased sensitivity
- increased fragility
Ocular media changes
Decreased pupil diameter
Effects of increased intake
of systemic drugs
Increased incidence of corneal
age-related disorders
The effects of ageing on the eye (adapted from Woods9,10)
Decrease in visual acuity (reduction
greater for low contrast targe ts andunder low luminance)
Reduction in contrast sensitivity
for higher spatial and temporal
frequencies
Potential reduction in stereo acuity
Increased glare sensitivity
Initial Patient Assessment
6
There is increasing evidence to suggest that UV radiationcan be harmful to ocular tissues. UV-blocking contactlenses help provide additional protection to the cornea,lens and retina, especially against entry of UV light at the
temporal l imbus. However, in pursuits involving exposure tohigh concentrations of ultraviolet light, such as skiing, thepatient should be advised to wear wrap-around sunglasses or
goggles to oer glare protection and to prevent damage to theconjunctiva, lid margins and surrounding skin.
Patients ageWhile there is no maximum age, or indeed minimum age, at
which a patient can wear contact lenses, the practitioner has toappreciate the changes that take place in the ageing eye. The
physiological changes that occur with ageing are summarised inTable 2. The presbyopic patient will require special management.However, the practitioner should also consider the eect changingfrom spectacles to contact lenses would have on all contact lens
wearers. Most myopes of more than 4.00D will notice theincreased accommodation and convergence needed for close
work with contact lenses and should be forewarned of this.
Fitting contact lenses to children can be especially rewarding,and most commonly considered from the age of eight upwards.When considering tting children with contact lenses the
practitioner needs to assess the maturity and ability of thechild to look after the lenses. This discussion needs to takeplace with the childs parents. Patient dexterity also needs to beconsidered, but deciencies can often be overcome by greaterattention to the teaching of patient handling techniques.
8/21/2019 01 Initial Patient Assessment.pdf
7/13
7
Essential Contact Lens Practice
Complexion
Patients with auburn hair and freckled skin have increasedcorneal sensitivity. Blue-eyed and fair-skinned patients alsohave relatively sensitive corneas and are more likely to have
problems adapting to lenses, especially rigid lenses.
Motivation
Assessment of a patients needs and degree of motivation forcontact lenses must be made. Nelson and West11 concludedfrom a small study that stable, well-adjusted extroverted people
were more likely to adapt to contact lenses without dicultythan anxious, introverted and less stable personalities.
Patients who are highly motivated and comply with instructions
have an increased probability of success. Discussions should takeplace to allow the practitioner to assess the expectations of thepatient with regard to contact lens wear. Part of the discussionshould also include the opportunity to discuss refractive surgery.Many patients who have had problems with contact lenses inthe past might register an interest in surgery without realisinghow much contact lenses have changed. It is important that thepatient be given a balanced and objective perspective of all the
vision correction options that are open to them.
Unrealistic expectations need to be discussed and the
limitations of any chosen lens type and wear modalityexplained. Patient expectations are a key factor in the successor failure of contact lens wear.
Financial considerations
Practitioners should not pre-judge a patients ability to pay.The main focus should be on the prospective wearers visualneeds. The practitioner should present the most suitable lensto the patient, but it is the patient who should make a decision
with regard to the nancial commitment.
Never assume nancial status. Patients must be made awareof the ongoing costs of contact lens wear and care.
Smoking
Studies show that smokers are more likely than non-smokersto develop microbial keratitis.12Patients who smoke should be
warned of this.
Ocular pathology
Contact lens tting is indicated in the management of severalocular conditions keratoconus and monocular aphakia, forexample. Fitting in the presence of active pathology should neverbe undertaken without the prior approval of an ophthalmologist.
8/21/2019 01 Initial Patient Assessment.pdf
8/13
TAB
LE
3
Possible effects of systemic medications and general health status on contact lens wear
C O N D I T I O N P O T E N T I A L P R O B L E M M E D I C AT I O N P O T E N T I A L P RO B L E M A D V I C E
Allergies Preservative reactions
Atopic reactionto deposit build-up
Antihistamines Atopic conjunctivitis
Contact lens associatedpapillary conjunctivitis
Reduced contactlens tolerance
One-day disposable
contact lenseor non-preservedsystems with frequentreplacements lenses
Monitor check fordry eyes
Skin condition(eg eczema)
Excessive deposits
Lid irritationsBlepharitis
Punctate keratitis
One-day disposableor frequentreplacement lens
Thin edge design
Avoid contact lenswear until clear
Monitor do not fitif clinically significant
Diabetes Reduced epithelialhealing
Close monitoring
Thyroid dysfunction Tear deficiencyand poor blinking
Avoid contactlens wear
Vitamin A deficiency Mucus deficiencydeposit build up
Monitor possible softfrequent replacement
Systemichypertension
-blockers,diuretics
Dry eye Monitor
Psychosis Contact lens adaptation Psychotics Dry eye Monitor contactlens wear possiblycontraindicated
Hormone changeseg birth control,pregnancy,menopause
Dry eyeCorneal contour changesChanges in cornealsensitivity
Oralcontraception
Dry eye Monitor
Initial Patient Assessment
8
Previous contact lens wearThe high number of contact lens dropouts in Europe means ahigh likelihood of previous contact lens wearers presenting tothe practitioner. In many cases these patients will not broach the
subject of contact lens wear as they will feel that, having failedonce, they are not suitable. It is important for the practitionerto probe the reasons why the lens wear was discontinued andsee if, assuming that these reasons could be overcome, thepatient would be interested in resuming lens wear. The mostcommon reasons for contact lens drop-out include discomfort,dryness and poor vision. In many cases these conditions can beaddressed with new materials, for example, silicone hydrogel,or updated replacement frequencies, such as daily disposables,or modern toric lens designs.13
8/21/2019 01 Initial Patient Assessment.pdf
9/13
9
Essential Contact Lens Practice
Dry eyes
Possibly one of the most common reasons for failure to wearcontact lenses is dry eye. Much debate remains as to the best
way to assess the dry eye. The use of specic questionnaires hasreceived some validation in the literature and is recommendedas a way of screening for potential dry-eyed patients. TheMcMonnies14questionnaire and the Dry Eye15questionnaire areexamples widely used in dry eye research. Key areas to exploreare the frequency of the symptom, the presence of discomfortand whether the patients lifestyle is aected.
Overall health and medication
As well as considering general health and the eects of systemicmedications on overall ocular performance, practitioners
should be aware of conditions and medications which mayhave a direct impact on a patients ability to wear contactlenses. Table 3 outlines some of these conditions and suggestsmanagement options.
Allergies
Approximately 25 per cent of the population suer allergies atsome time in their life. This number varies as a function of theclimate and will also be complicated seasonally with around 10per cent who report they suer from hay fever. It is important
for the practitioner to understand the atopic history of thepatient as this can impact lens and care product selection.Daily disposable lenses should be the rst choice for patients
who have ocular symptoms associated with allergies.16
Ocular history
Full consideration should be given to a patients ocularhistory as well as to pathology, dry eye and motivation giventhe degree of ametropia. Potential problems due to muscleimbalance should be considered, given the lack of prismatic
eect (assisting or not) in contact lens correction. Any previouscontact lens-wearing history should be fully explored, andany reasons for past failures noted. Details of any previousrefractive surgery should be investigated.
8/21/2019 01 Initial Patient Assessment.pdf
10/13
-5.00/-2.00x180 @ 10 mm
transposes to:
-5.00x90/-7.00x180 @ 10 mm
which from vertex correc tion
tables becomes:
-4.76x90/-6.54x180
and then
-4.75/-1.75x180
FOR EXAMPLE:
FIGURE
3 A method of recording the position ofthe lids with respect to the limbus
x
y
Initial Patient Assessment
10
Patient examinationBefore examining the anterior segment, the practitioner mustobtain a baseline refraction, perform a binocular assessmentand undertake an ophthalmological examination of thepatients eye. Refraction must be recorded as the ocularrefraction, taken as the spectacle refraction with compensationfor back vertex distance. It is important that in an astigmaticcorrection both meridians are treated independently in crosscylinder form (see example at left).
This becomes particularly important in the ordering of softtoric lenses and calculation of tear lm powers in rigid gas-permeable (RGP) lenses.
Anterior segment measurementsThe improved accuracy of measurements with the slit-lamp graticule has already been discussed. The followingmeasurements should be recorded.
Horizontal visible iris diameter (HVID)The horizontal visible iris diameter underestimates thehorizontal cornea by just under 1mm. Its value lies only inensuring that a soft lens total diameter is sucient to maintainfull corneal coverage.
Vertical palpebral apertureThe measurement of palpebral aperture is of questionablevalue in contact lens tting other than in the monitoring ofits size longitudinally. Of more relevance, especially for RGPand bifocal lens tting, is the position of the lids with respectto the limbus. This can be recorded as shown in Figure 3.
Superior x mm
Inferior y mm
Corneal coverage =
-ve, corneal exposure +ve
8/21/2019 01 Initial Patient Assessment.pdf
11/13
FIGUR
E
4
Preliminary contact lens examination
P A T I E N T D I S C U S S I O N
Personal details
Name, address
Age
Dexterity
Complexion
Occupation, recreation
Contact Lens specific
Expectations
Motivation
General History
Systemic disease history
Familial disorders
Motivation
Ocular history
Refraction correction past
Ocular disease history
Ocular symptoms
P A T I E N T E X A M I N A T I O N
Full eye examination
Vision
Refraction
Binocular assessment
Ophthalmoscopy
Measurements
Corneal curvature
Corneal diameter
Pupil size
Palpebral aperture
Examination of anterior
segment
Lids and lashes
Conjunctiva
Tears
Cornea
epithelium
stroma
endothelium
A S S E S S M E N T O F S U I T A B I L I T Y
11
Essential Contact Lens Practice
Pupil size
Pupil size measurement allows the practitioner to predict,and manage, any likely are from a misalignment of the pupildiameter with the back optic zone diameter of a rigid lens. Itis also an important variable in predicting rigid bifocal contactlens success. An estimation of maximum pupil diameter may bemade by viewing with the Burton lamp in a darkened room.
Tear prism height
The height of the inferior tear meniscus gives a useful guideto the volume of tears on the eye. The slit-lamp graticule orslit height can be used to judge the height of the tear meniscusformed at the margin of the lower lid. A normal value wouldbe around 0.4mm.
Keratometry
While keratometry values have no correlation to soft lenstting performance, it is nevertheless important that theseshould be recorded, whatever the type of lens to be tted.K-readings should be monitored on a regular basis throughoutthe aftercare. They should be compared to baseline values takenat the initial tting. As well as the values, the clarity of themires must also be recorded. This gives an indication of cornealclarity and is a sensitive monitor of early corneal distortion.
8/21/2019 01 Initial Patient Assessment.pdf
12/13
TABLE
4
Variations from the norm that need to be considered in the initial slit-lamp examination
S T R U C T U R E VA R I AT I O N F R O M T H E N O R M M A N A G E M E N T O P T I O N S
Eyelashes Blepharitis
Stye
Resolve condition before fitting,be aware of atopic reactions
Usually limiting wait until cleared up
Eyelid margin Meibomian gland dysfunction
Meibomian gland cyst
Treat with hot compress before fitting
Refer for removal before fitting
Palpebral conjunctiva Hyperaemia
Follicle and/or papillae
Ascertain cause prior to fitting
Depending on severity fit with RGP lens withintensive cleaning or soft one-day disposable orfrequent replacement and nonpreserved care system
Bulbar conjunctiva Hyperaemia
Pinguecula/pterygium
Ascertain cause prior to fitting
Ensure minimum mechanical stimulus on area
Limbus Vascularisation Record for baseline, if physiological loops
fit as normal if neovascularisation fit higher Dk/tmaterial and monitor closely
Cornea Staining
Opacities
Oedema
Ascertain cause prior to fitting
Ascertain cause, record for baseline information
Fit high-Dk RGP lenses or high Dk/t siliconehydrogel lenses
Initial Patient Assessment
12
Non-invasive break-up time(NIBUT)/tear thinning time (TT T)
As well as its use in measuring corneal radius and assessingcorneal contour, keratometry may also be used to measuretear lm stability. The technique involves recording the timetaken for the reected mire image (the rst catoptric image) todistort (TTT) and/or break up after a blink (NIBUT). Tolerantcontact lens wearers average a NIBUT of around 20 seconds.
The advantages of this technique, as opposed to uorescein, areits accuracy and repeatability. Instillation of uorescein into theeye causes disruption of the lipid layer and, as well as stimulatingreex tearing, decreases the stability of the tear lm.
Anterior segment examinationThe slit-lamp examination is probably the most importantprocedure in both preassessment and aftercare of the contactlens wearer. It is sucient to stress here that a full slit-lampexamination should be conducted and the results recorded infull. Use of a grading scheme will enable the practitioner toquantify the results and should be routinely used. Table 4 liststhe main structures to be examined. The table also suggestshow variations from the norm may be considered to help thepractitioner identify the most suitable lens.
8/21/2019 01 Initial Patient Assessment.pdf
13/13
Essential Contact Lens Practice
R E F E R E N C E S
1. Jones L, Jones, D, Langley C andHoulford M. Reactive or proactivecontact lens fitting does it make adifference?JBCLA, 1996; 19: 2 4143.
2. Morgan SL and Efron, NE Thebenefits of a proactive approach tocontact lens fitting.JBCLA, 1996; 19: 397101.
3. Efron, N. (2000) Efron GradingScale for Contact Lens Complications.Millennium Edition, January 1, 2000.Biocompatibles Hydron
4. Panting G. Cited in Euro Times,February, 2000.
5. Nilsson SEG Contact lenses and thework environment.In: Ruben M, Guillon M, eds. ContactLens Practice. Chapman & Hall Medical,1994; 917-930.
6. Ruston D, Meyler J. A newsilicone hydrogel lens for contact
lens-related dryness. Subjectiveclinical performance. Optician, 2005October 7th.
7. Choo J, Vuu K, Bergenske P BurnhamK Smythe, J, Caroline P. Bacterialpopulations on silicone hydrogeland hydrogel contact lenses afterswimming in a chlorinated pool. Optom& Vis Science, 2005; 82:2 134-137.
8. Josephson JE and Caffery BC Contactlens considerations in surface andsubsurface aqueous environments.
Optom & Vis Science, 1991; 68:1 211.
9. Woods RL. The ageing eye andcontact lenses a review of ocularcharacteristics.JBCLA, 1991; 14:3115127.
10. Woods RL. The ageing eye andcontact lenses a review of visualperformance.JBCLA, 1992; 15:1 3143.
11. Nelson DM. and West L. Adapting tolenses: the personality of success andfailure.JBCLA, 1987; 10:1 3637.
12. Stapleton F. Contact lensRelatedMicrobial Keratitis: What canepidemiologic studies tell us? Eye &Contact Lens, 2003; 29(15): 585-589
13. Young G. Veys J. Pritchard N.Coleman S. A multi-centre study oflapsed contact lens wearers. OpthalPhys Opt, 2002; 22: 516-527.
14. McMonnies CW. Key questions ina dry eye history.J Am Optom Assoc,2006; 57:7 512517.
15. Begley Cet al. Use of the dry eyequestionnaire to measure symptomsof ocular irritation in patients withaqueous tear deficient dry eye. Cornea.2002; 21: 664-70
16. Hayes VY. Schnider CM. Veys J. Anevaluation of 1-day dipsosable contactlens wear in a population of allergysufferers. Contact Lens & Anterior Eye,2003; 28: 85-93
Patient informationOnce the decision as to the type of contact lens has beenmade, the practitioner must take responsibility for explainingthe reasons. The discussion should include information onthe benets and risks of the particular wear modality andtype of contact lens chosen, as well as advice on the likelyongoing maintenance costs, the importance of regularaftercare, emergency procedures and the need for patientself-monitoring. This is made easier by the use of a patientinstruction book and acknowledgement form.
SummaryContact lens aftercare begins with the preassessment of theprospective wearer. By considering patient requirements,motivation, history and symptoms, and the physiological stateof the eye as parts of a jigsaw, the practitioner can compile apicture of the best management option for an individual patient.
Time spent at this stage helps avoid unnecessary failures. Figure4 is a ow chart, showing how objective and subjective ndingsare considered in turn to reach the nal decision.
The Vision Care Instituteis a trademark of Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd. Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd. 2008
Jane VeysMSc MCOptomFBCLA FAAO, Education Director,
The Vision Care InstituteJohnson & Johnson Vision Care,Europe, Middle East & Africa.Formerly in contact lens research,optometric education andindependent practice.
John MeylerBSc FCOptomDipCLP Senior DirectorProfessional Affairs, Johnson& Johnson Vision Care, Europe,Middle East & Africa. Formerly inindependent optometric practice.
Ian DaviesBSc MCOptom DipCLP
FAAO, Vice President, TheVision Care Institute Johnson& Johnson Vision Care, Europe,Middle East & Africa. Formerlyin contact lens research andindependent optometric practice.
AUTHORS