02 December 2014 _ Insights

5/2/2015 Insights Daily Current Events, 02 December 2014 | INSIGHTS

http://www.insightsonindia.com/2014/12/02/insightsdailycurrentevents02december2014/ 1/6

insightsonindia.com http://www.insightsonindia.com/2014/12/02/insightsdailycurrentevents02december2014/

By INSIGHTS

INSIGHTS Simplifying UPSC IAS Exam Preparation

Insights Daily Current Events, 02 December 2014

Insights Daily Current Events, 02 December 2014

Hornbill festival

It is the biggest indigenous festival and the annual tourism promotional event of the Nagaland government. It isorganized by the Government of Nagaland. It is celebrated every year in the first week of December.

Why?

To encourage intertribal interaction and to promote cultural heritage of Nagaland.

More details:

The Festival is named after the hornbill, the globally respected bird and which is displayed in folklore inmost of the state’s tribes.

The program unites all the people of Nagaland and showcases different traditional arts which includepaintings, sculptures and wood carvings.

It is the coming together of all the elements that make up the total Nagaland. The Hornbill festival is acollaborative celebration of all Naga tribes at one venue and has been coined as “Festival of Festivals”.

The Festival is a tribute to the great “Hornbill” which is the most admired and revered bird for the Nagas,for its qualities of alertness and grandeur. The Majestic bird is closely identified with the social andcultural life of the Nagas, as reflected in various tribal folklores, dances and songs. The awe andadmiration for the bird is symbolically displayed on almost all tribal traditional headgears worn during thefestival and is indicative of the commonness of the Nagas.

The Hornbill Festival of Nagaland is a cultural extravaganza to revive, protect and preserve the richnessand uniqueness of the Naga heritage, while for the visitors to this event, it is a means for comprehensiveunderstanding of the Naga People, their land and culture.

Since 2007, International cultural troupes have been taking part in it and it is slowly turning out to be aninternational event.

Sources: PIB, Wiki, hornbillfestival.com.



Universal Account Number

The Universal Account Number (UAN) has been designed to be an umbrella number of a member for all hisemployment with different establishments in organized sector.

Why was it introduced?

To provide one number to the Employees’ Provident Fund member for all his employments with differentemployers.

How will this help?

Earlier, whenever Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) member changed his job, he had totransfer his Provident Fund accumulations to his new Provident Fund number. With the introduction ofUAN number, now, member has to give his UAN number to his present employer for linking his previousProvident Fund accounts with his present Provident Fund membership.

This would benefit the members initially in the following ways:

The member can get this updated Provident Fund balance through Universal Account Number (UAN)based member portal.

The system would enable portability of Provident Fund accumulations when the details of bank account,Aadhar and PAN seeded in UAN database of member are verified by employer on change of job.

The member would get message on his mobile number about the receipt of his PF contribution if he hasregistered his mobile number on Universal Account Number (UAN) based member portal.

Sources: PIB.

Bill sought to ratify boundary pact

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on External Affairs has tabled its report, recommending a Constitutionamendment Bill to enable the swapping of enclaves and end a 67yearold dispute between the two countries.

Why the swapping is being done?

Land swapping will be done for a permanent solution to the problem of infiltration.

About the land swap deal:

The swap will involve handing over 17,000 acres of land to Bangladesh in return for 7,000 acres in 111enclaves in West Bengal, Assam, Tripura and Meghalaya, and was first decided under the 1974 LandBoundary Agreement (LBA) between India and Bangladesh, but never ratified by Parliament.

It will require an amendment to the Constitution (the 119th amendment) ratified by both Houses ofParliament with a twothirds majority.

The deal relates to demarcation of boundary under the Land Boundary Agreement between the twocountries. India and Bangladesh have been negotiating the land swap for years to resolve a longrunningborder conflict.

How will affect the existing citizens:

The number of people to be involved in the whole swap is approximately 52,000, of which about 15,000



are on the Indian side of the border.

Under this intended agreement, the enclave residents could continue to reside at their present location ormove to the country of their choice.

A number of Indian nationals living in Indian enclaves in Bangladesh territory are going to be adverselyaffected as they would lose their claim to Indian citizenship.

Now, it becomes the responsibilities of the governments of India and Bangladesh to ensure that there is no“discrimination” against them.

Opposition:

Some people have been opposing the deal on the ground that Assam will stand to lose more territory ascompared to Bangladesh in the exchange of enclaves.

Sources: The Hindu.

TS plea on Krishna water disputes

The Supreme Court, recently, observed that it cannot “close its doors” on newlyformed Telangana’s plea for afresh look at the interState sharing of Krishna river water, even as Karnataka, one of the beneficiary States,strongly objected to the reopening of the fivedecadeold dispute.

What is the issue now?

Telangana has filed a fresh petition in the Supreme Court, contending that its interests were notrepresented before the Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal – II.

It sought total reconsideration of the Tribunal’s final award in December 2010 as it concerned onlyKarnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra.

Telangana petition says that it faced the grim prospect of hardly any water reaching its borders from anyone of the three arms of the river, namely Bhima, Tungabhadra or the main Krishna.

It is said that Telangana, which came into existence only on June 2 this year, did not get an opportunity toraise its “independent grievances”.

In August this year, the Supreme Court had prima facie recognised Telangana’s status as an “affected” Statewith a voice of its own.



Opposition to Telangana’s Plea:

It is being said that “Telangana was never heard before the Krishna Tribunals” was factually wrong. Theterritories, which later became Telangana after bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh, were earlier representedby the undivided State. Hence it is being said that the award of the Tribunal, binding on the erstwhileState, is now binding on the successor State.

The InterState Water Disputes Act of 1956 says the award of the Tribunal is final. Now, reopening theTribunal award would require statutory amendment.

It is also being said that the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act already provided for the bifurcation andhas extended the tenure of the Krishna Water Tribunal – II to look into the problems of Telangana. So,when the tribunal is already considering the issue there was no need for Telangana to come before thecourt.

As per the final award passed on December 2010, Andhra Pradesh is entitled to get 1,001 tmcft of water,Karnataka will get 907 tmcft and Maharashtra’s share is 666 tmcft. This award is binding till 2050.

About Krishna river water dispute:

The dispute is between the states of Karnataka, Maharashtra, and Andhra Pradesh over sharing of



Krishna river water.

Central government had set up a tribunal in 1969 under the state water disputes act 1956 to resolve thedispute. The tribunal was headed by Justice R.S. Bachawat.

The tribunal gave its award in 1973. While the Tribunal had in its earlier report detailed two schemes,Scheme A and Scheme B, the final award only included Scheme A and Scheme B was left out. SchemeA pertained to the division of the available waters based on 75% dependability, while Scheme Brecommended ways to share the surplus waters.

The KWDT in its award outlined the exact share of each state. The award contended based on 75%dependability that the total quantum of water available for distribution was 2060TMC. This was dividedbetween the three states in the following manner.

Maharashtra 560 TMC

Karnataka 700 TMC

Andhra Pradesh 800 TMC

Review of the Award:

The KWDT1 provided for a review of its award after 31 May 2000. However no such review was takenup for more than 3 years after that.

In April 2004, the second KWDT, was constituted by the Government of India following requests by allthree states.

The second Krishna Water Dispute Tribunal gave its draft verdict on 31 December 2010. The allocationof available water was done according to 65% dependability, considering the records of flow of water forpast 47 years. According to KWDT II, Andhra Pradesh got 1001 TMC of water, Karnataka 907 TMC andMaharashtra 666 TMC. Next review of water allocations will be after the year 2050.

The Krishna River is the second biggest river in peninsular India. It originates near Mahabaleshwar inMaharashtra from the statue of a cow in a temple. It then runs for a distance of 303 km in Maharashtra, 480km through the breadth of North Karnataka and the rest of its 1300 km journey in Andhra Pradesh beforeit empties into the Bay of Bengal.

The river basin is 257,000 km², and the States of Maharastra, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh contributes68,800 km² (26.8%), 112,600 sq.k.m. (43.8%) and 75,600 km² (29.4%) respectively.

Sources: The Hindu, Wiki.



INSIGHTS © 2015. All Rights Reserved.

Documents

02 December 2014 _ Insights