Upload
abhik-biswas
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 0207xx embu-project-gap-analysis-rev2-ME.xls
1/1
EMBU Project Priority Matrix
Jul-02
What are we doing
Why are we doing it
FY03 Planning EDNM
Device Management
V 2.0 Jul 29 02
Detailed Project Listing Primary
Drive r of theProject
Other critical
factors drivingproject
Competitive
SituationAnalysis
Market Share
Position
Deals close w/o it Would
start-upfund it
Impact of a de lay till
FY04
Impact of cancel Impact of
Accel
Projected# of
Units
Staffed for
Success?
Direct
RevenueFY03
FTE's
Req'dfor
Can be
combined w/
Project
Assesment
Sustaining - includes necessary
ongoing bug fixes and minor feature
enhancements to current shipping
products. These projects have
been concept commited and are
slated for EC and FCS FHFY03
Customer,
Field Sales,
TAC, Hardware
BU, EMBU
Revenue
Quality,
Customer
Satisfaction,
PERS,
Transition to NG
Needed to
maintain
competitive
advantage -
others are
catching up
especially in
"niche - element"
arena
Needed to ensure
and maintain
current market
position
No future
hardware sales at
many enterprise
accounts (Disney,
WFB, Travelers,
Oracle, Hancock
etc.) depend on our
ability to fix defects
and deliver
incremental
NA Customer
dissatisfaction mainly
with device support and
bug fixes. Implications
of future hardware
sales, we've seen
examples of this in the
past (Bogueyse
Telecom, State of Cal,
WFB, etc)
Severe impact on
customer sat and
revenue
implications to BU
and future
hardware sales.
(Not an option for
sustaining)
No impact Drop in FY03
forecast for
LMS/RWAN etc.
Project
details below
12 to 30 M
in direct
revenue
see
below
NO Sustaining
needs to be
done to
address bug
fixes and
support
obligations.
GO
CiscoView 5.x -no major changesslated, bug fix only Customer,TAC, Hardware
BU
Quality,Customer
Satisfaction,
other BU
bundles
Added competitivepressure in
element mgmnt
area and
especially in
regards to
embedded mgmnt
see future projects
below.
Needed to ensureand maintain
current market
position, most
popular and
widely used Cisco
product offering.
Deals can be heldup if CV support is
not there. AT&T for
Manhatten for
example.
NA Bug fix only, minorimpact overall NA No impact LMS, RWAN,SNMS, CWW,
CW4MW, CWM,
CEMF, Cable
bundles (approx
11,000 units of
CV)
Mkt = YES NA Dev = 1Tst =? Already ispart of
overall CV
project(s)
slated for
FY03
Minimalresource
required, roll
into LMS 2.2
bundle
refresh
GO
RME 3.5 -minor feature release
(OTP support for Netconfig, Syslog
history, VLAN.dat files in archive)
with bug fixes to maintain product
Customer, TAC Product Quality Needed to ensure
and maintain
current market
position
Device support in
RME is essential to
closing hardware
deals.
NA Needed as stop gap
and holdover to
transition to next gen
RME
Impact on
sustaining EMBU
revenues and
commitment to
LMS/RWAN/SNMS
/VMS bundles
(approx 12k units
FY03)
Mkt = YES NA part of
LMS, VMS,
RWAN,
SNMS
Dev =
26
Yes, RME
NG
Project CC,
EC 8/02,
FCS 12/02
GO
Campus Manager 3.3- minor
feature release including SSL
support, moving ANI from CMF to
CM, performance improvements and
PERs requests to UT, Path Trace
and Topo Services
Customer,
TAC, Field
Sales
EMBU Eng.
Move ANI from
CMF and SSL
support for
coexistence with
RME
OV and others are
starting to nip at
the edges with
more L2
capabilities
Helps with overall
market share in
regards to L2
campus
functionality
(VLAN, UT areas)
Campus is being
used more in
enterprise
production
networks, Fidelity,
Travelers, Hancock,
Oracle rely heavily
on Topo services
and UT applications
now for day-to-day
NA Product has been
"stale" since 3.x
release, no new
features have been
addressed in over 24
months, customers are
concerned with viability
of the product moving
forward.
Impact on
sustaining EMBU
revenues and
commitment to
large enterprise
customers such as;
Disney, Oracle,
Fidelity..
little or no
impact,
customer
commits
LMS bundle
(approx 5k units
FY03)
Mkt = YES NA part of
LMS
Dev = 6 NO Project CC,
EC 8/02,
FCS 12/02
GO
CWW 6.x -minor refresh to include
WUG 8.0 to stay current with
Ipswitch product offering.
Customer Stay current with
Ipswitch WUG
version only
A lot of low end
products are
gaining share in
this area ie. Solar
Popular with low
end SMB and
channel
Yes NA Minimal impact Approx 5M annual
revenue stream
none 2-3k units per
year
Mkt = YES 5M Dev = 1
Tst =?
SNMS Targeted
FCS
Q3FY03
Delay
Incremental Device Updates 1.x -quarterly device updates and bug
fixes posted to CCO
Customer,TAC, Hardware
BU
Address overalldevice support
backlog for
RME, Campus,
DFM
Required to helpstay current with
new devices
NA No, several largedeals require
knowledge
availability and
commitment to
device support,
NA IDUs are quarterlyupdates and are TIME
driven releases, they
cannot be delayed
Severe impact onhardware sales and
BU commits
NA, timebased
Unknown Mkt = YES NA Dev =11
NO Quarterlyupdates
GO
CiscoView Dev ice Packages-
ongoing support for new CiscoView
device packages
Customer,
TAC, Hardware
BU
New feature set
management BU
driven (ie
Emblade)
Required to help
stay current with
new devices
Huge insta lled
base
Helps sell and
showcase device
features in
competitive
No Device, BU driven,
delay could impact
potential sales
Severe impact on
hardware sales and
BU commits
NA, time
based
LMS, RWAN,
SNMS, CWW,
CW4MW, CWM,
CEMF, Cable
Mkt = YES NA Dev =
35
NO As needed GO
LMS 2.2 - bundle refresh that
serves as delivery vehicles for all of
the sustaining projects listed aboveplus RTM and DFM , Target FCS
12/02
Customer,
Field Sales,
TAC, HardwareBU, EMBU
Revenue
Buys time for
transition to NG
product,necessary
security features
for CM
Treading water. Large installed
base.
No, see product
commitments above.
NA Customer satisfaction
quality, prolongs
transition if delayed
Severe impact on
hardware sales and
overall satisfaction
Could
improve
overallschedules to
deliver next
gen if
FY03 = 6000
(includes UPG, P1
and UPTs)
Mktng = YES 40 - 50 M NO FCS Dec 02,
needed to
maintainLMS rev
stream
GO
SNMS 1.1- bundle refresh to
include RME 3.5 and CV 6.0 and
CMF 2.2, Target FCS 2/03
Customer,
Field Sales,
TAC, Hardware
BU, EMBU
Revenue
Puts SNMS on
same version
release of
current shipping
RME
Provides overall
competitive
diffentiator at low
end especially
against Hua-Wei
New product
gaining
momentum with
Channels.
Yes, but provides
unparalleled
capabilities for SMB
customers.
NA Causes more issues
with EMBU eng, as we
would need to support
two version of RME in
the field.
Additional support
costs, far outweigh
the effort of rolling
the bundle.
600 to 1000 Mkt = YES 5 M NO FCS 3/03 GO
RME for Cable - New cable
management functionality for RME
including, Netconfig, Configlets and
Netshow reports. Target FCS 8/02
Customers,
Hardware BU
Enables
competitive
advantage for
provisioning inCable Mgmnt
This allows Cisco
cable devices to
be configured
more easilyimproving overall
Yes and no. Greatly
improves chances of
selling Cisco Cable
solutions in Tier 1MSOs.
Unknown Time to market is one
reason RME was
chosen for the cable
config functionality
unknown none Mktn = YES
(Cable team)
Dev = 1 NO No EMBU
resources
required
GO
RME CEMF Integration P1- basic
integration including device import
and launch facilities. Concept
committed 6/02, EC 7/02, FCS
SP Customers INSMBU commit Provides key
functionality to
CEMF OSS
Strategy
Yes No Mktn = YES
in conjunction
with INSMBU
Dev = 1 GO
RME for Andiamo - basic device
support for new storage
management device. Concept
Committed,has this been EC'd
Customers,
Hardware BU
BU commitment Helps provide
needed mgmnt
functionality to be
competitive
New product Don't know. Unknown commitment at BU level unknown GO
New Projects- includes all newprojects that are under investigation
or that will be concept committed,
execution committed and or FCS in
FY03
Customer,Field Sales,
TAC, Hardware
BU, EMBU
Revenue
New revenueopportunities,
enablement of
hardware sales,
improved
customer
see individualprojects below
Mgmnt Intranet II,new UI and
security features
will enhance and
improve overall
messaging and
see individualprojects below
see individual projectsbelow
see individualprojects below
GO
CiscoView 6.x - improved
usability, performance and
lightweight client (removal of
required plugin). Concept
Committed, EC 9/02, FCS Q3FY03
Customer
(performance,
usability), Field
Sales,
Hardware BU
Next Gen UI,
security and
coexistence with
other NG
products. CIDS
enabled, impacts
other Cisco
bundles.
Raises the bar on
the competition in
regards to robust
element mgmnt
functionality.
Merges best of
embedded and
non-embedded
Gain market
share in new
features and
intranet II
messaging.
Yes, initially
customers can use
5.x until full
transition to NG 6.0
is completed approx
12 months
No Pushes out the NG
strategy and delivery of
new capabilities. Will
have impact on
customer satisfaction
and other NG
programs.
Serious impact on
new messaging and
will impact BU ability
to generate new
revenue.
Targeted for
Q3FY03
accel would
not help as it
depends on
availability of
RME 3.5
program for
SNMS, LMS,
RWAN, CW4MW,
CWM, Cable
(approx 5k units)
Mktng = Yes NA Dev = 1 Yes, CV
5.x, and
embedded
Concept
Commit 5/02,
EC 9/02,
FCS 4/03
GO
CiscoView Embedded - platform
for building embedded management
functionality for new Cisco devices
and modules. This is needed to
bring consistency across new
services being added to Cisco
switches. Initial CC with evolution
from Brinks project.
Field Sales,
Hardware BU
Catalyst 6k
service blade
requirements,
Brinks project for
security
Many of our
competitors in
VPN/Security and
other L2/L3
services are
providing fairly
robust embedded
management
functionality. It is
imperative to
showcase the
competitive
features via an
"HTTP" session
Depends upon
the specific
funtional area.
This should help
improve overall
market share.
Yes, but it will
should help to
accelerate sales. In
the low end SMB
market it might
actually defer sales.
No Puts more pressure on
Bus to develop their
own embedded
management apps if not
delivered this year with
initial platform targeted
towards the Brinks
project.
Business Units will
fund their own
embedded
development,
consistency across
platforms will be
lost.
minimal Tied to hardware
sales of Cat6k
and service
blades
Mktng = Yes None Dev = 5 Yes, CV
NG team
will work
on this.
Concept
Commit 8/02
w/Brinks
team?
GO
RME (4.0) Next Gen- majorfeature release including new UI,
long awaited security features,
integration w/ACS, performance
improvements, scalability
improvements, basic APIs and
enables new packaging for large
enterprise SP market segments. CC
Q1FY03, EC Q1FY03, FCS Q4FY03
Customer,Field Sales,
EMBU
Revenue
Large Enterpriseand SP
customer
satisfaction
issues.
Conitnued delay
in delivery of key
functions in
secured views
will have impact
on EMBU
credibility.
Foundry IronView(INM) provides
extensive
role/group, config
and change
management and
SNMPv3 support.http:/ /www.foundry networks
.com/products/networkman/i
ronview/datasheet. html
RME NG will allowCisco to maintain
and revitalize
market share
through new
Management
Intranet 2
messaging
including common
management
data.
Yes, howevercontinuing to push
out high priority
requirements
addressed by NG
will have impact on
future hardware
sales at large
enterprise
customers including:
USPS, AT&T, Sprint,
Chase, WFB,
Boeing, Intel,
Oracle, Fidelity etc.
No Serious customersatisfaction issues will
arise as well as field
sales confidence in the
BU ability to provide
timely enhancements to
critical feature sets.
Many of the proposed
features ie. secured
views have been put off
for over 2 years
already!!!
Severe customerdissatisfaction,
possible delay in
hardware
purchases and
revenue to Cisco,
EMBU engineering
retention issues
Would havepositive
impact on
overall
messaging
but
dependent
upon RME
3.x
maintenance
train.
LMS, RWAN,SNMS, VMS and
new LE bundle
(approx. 1k units
if ship in 6/03)
Mktng = Yes Approx1.5M if
ship in
Q4FY03.
Dev =23
GO
RME NorthBound API's -provides a suite of NB APIs with
appropriate documentation and
support to allow both internal BUs
and external third parties and
customers to leverage RME
backend services via NB APIs. . This
will help us differentiate a Cisco
Network in SP's by allowing better
integration with NMS/OSS. CC
Q2FY03, EC Q3FY03, FCS FHFY04
ServiceProvider,
Large
Enterprise
Third Party ISVs,Managed
Service
Providers
(Verizon, AT&T)
Could gainsignificant market
share in large
enterprise,
service provider
and managed
provider market
segments.
Yes, but will addsignificant value in
situations where the
customer wants to
integrate our
solution into a home
grown app or an
NMS/OSS solution.
No Customer's in the LEand SP space will have
to invest in building
and maintaining their
own scripts to meet
basic mgmnt needs.
Loss of opportunityin the SP space.
Also will result in a
lot of overlapping
functionality bein
developed in
different parts of
the BU and Cisco.
Mktng = No Delay
Advanced Management
Services- best of Campus, VLAN
config, User Tracking, improved
Topo based upon NG UI, securityservices, CMD. Concept Commit
Q4FY03, FCS Q2FY04.
Customer,
Field Sales
Will help offset
other L2
momentum from
HP and others
(iManage HauWei)
Maintain current
market share at a
minimum may
increase with MI2
messaging.
Yes Topo
only
maybe.
minimal Impact on abilty to
provide important
customer used
capabilities, would
severely impact
overall customer
none FY04 = 2,400 M - No 4.8 M CC FY03,
FCS 04Delay
SNMS 2.0 - new version of SNMS
targeted at SMB and channel
market segment. Cooperative effort
between DSBU, PCG and EMBU.
Includes CMF, CV 6.x, RME 4.x and
WUG with improved "my Ciscoworks"
UI for novice users. CC Q2FY03,
EC Q2FY03, FCS Q4FY03 w/new
17xx router platforms.
Customer,
Field Sales,
Hardware BU
SMB, DSBU,
Comercial
Solar Winds, Hua
Wei. This will
provide clear
differentiation at
low end for Cisco.
Gain market
share in new
features and
intranet II
messaging.
Yes, but will help
accelerate sales for
low end switches
and routers.
Unknown Miss opportunity to
cooperatively market
with new router platform
launch.
none FY03 = 200
FY04 = 5000
Mktng = Yes GO
Performance Mgmnt - investigate
delivery of new basic performance
management functionality for WAN.
Many customers have requested
Cisco to provide a set of baseline
performance monitoring and
reporting capabilities.
Field Sales,
EMBU
Revenue
Strong competition
from products like
Lucent'sVitalSuite. The
lack of cisco
offerings in this
area allows Lucent
to enter Cisco
accounts.
Improve market
share and full
FCAPsfunctionality for
the enterprise.
Field bids with non
Cisco products.
Run into competitiveissues with other
vendors like
Netscout.
Yes None, since we do not
have an offering in this
space.
NA Greater
barriers to
entry forcompetition.
More
complete
solution from
Cisco should
improve
customer
FY04 = 2,400 NO Approx.
10M in
FY04
possibly
with NAMDelay
Branch Office Agent- The BOA
provides us a solution to providing a
decentralized, store and forward
kind of solution for managing very
distributed environments. An
example would be a department
store like Walmart which has acentral office and thousands of
Customer,
Field Sales
Large Retail,
WalMart, Home
Depot, State
Farm etc.
M - No Delay
Multicast- Configuration,
monitoring and troubleshooting of
multicast environments are getting
to be more important with the
Customer,
Field Sales
Fidelity No competitive
pressure.
Opportunity to
lead with a quality
N - Mktg, N -
DevDelay
Asset Mgmnt Customer N - Mktg, N - Delay
Tools Program- This is a program
which will help provide a way to
provide scripts, utilities, tools which
add value to the CiscoWorks
products. These may be developed
in the field, by our Dev teams or 3rdparty. By providing this to our field
and channel we will help them
provide a better value to customers
at the same time not adding to our
dev or support costs.
M - No Delay
N - Mktg, N -
DevDelay
N - Mktg, N - Delay