0207xx embu-project-gap-analysis-rev2-ME.xls

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 0207xx embu-project-gap-analysis-rev2-ME.xls

    1/1

    EMBU Project Priority Matrix

    Jul-02

    What are we doing

    Why are we doing it

    FY03 Planning EDNM

    Device Management

    V 2.0 Jul 29 02

    Detailed Project Listing Primary

    Drive r of theProject

    Other critical

    factors drivingproject

    Competitive

    SituationAnalysis

    Market Share

    Position

    Deals close w/o it Would

    start-upfund it

    Impact of a de lay till

    FY04

    Impact of cancel Impact of

    Accel

    Projected# of

    Units

    Staffed for

    Success?

    Direct

    RevenueFY03

    FTE's

    Req'dfor

    Can be

    combined w/

    Project

    Assesment

    Sustaining - includes necessary

    ongoing bug fixes and minor feature

    enhancements to current shipping

    products. These projects have

    been concept commited and are

    slated for EC and FCS FHFY03

    Customer,

    Field Sales,

    TAC, Hardware

    BU, EMBU

    Revenue

    Quality,

    Customer

    Satisfaction,

    PERS,

    Transition to NG

    Needed to

    maintain

    competitive

    advantage -

    others are

    catching up

    especially in

    "niche - element"

    arena

    Needed to ensure

    and maintain

    current market

    position

    No future

    hardware sales at

    many enterprise

    accounts (Disney,

    WFB, Travelers,

    Oracle, Hancock

    etc.) depend on our

    ability to fix defects

    and deliver

    incremental

    NA Customer

    dissatisfaction mainly

    with device support and

    bug fixes. Implications

    of future hardware

    sales, we've seen

    examples of this in the

    past (Bogueyse

    Telecom, State of Cal,

    WFB, etc)

    Severe impact on

    customer sat and

    revenue

    implications to BU

    and future

    hardware sales.

    (Not an option for

    sustaining)

    No impact Drop in FY03

    forecast for

    LMS/RWAN etc.

    Project

    details below

    12 to 30 M

    in direct

    revenue

    see

    below

    NO Sustaining

    needs to be

    done to

    address bug

    fixes and

    support

    obligations.

    GO

    CiscoView 5.x -no major changesslated, bug fix only Customer,TAC, Hardware

    BU

    Quality,Customer

    Satisfaction,

    other BU

    bundles

    Added competitivepressure in

    element mgmnt

    area and

    especially in

    regards to

    embedded mgmnt

    see future projects

    below.

    Needed to ensureand maintain

    current market

    position, most

    popular and

    widely used Cisco

    product offering.

    Deals can be heldup if CV support is

    not there. AT&T for

    Manhatten for

    example.

    NA Bug fix only, minorimpact overall NA No impact LMS, RWAN,SNMS, CWW,

    CW4MW, CWM,

    CEMF, Cable

    bundles (approx

    11,000 units of

    CV)

    Mkt = YES NA Dev = 1Tst =? Already ispart of

    overall CV

    project(s)

    slated for

    FY03

    Minimalresource

    required, roll

    into LMS 2.2

    bundle

    refresh

    GO

    RME 3.5 -minor feature release

    (OTP support for Netconfig, Syslog

    history, VLAN.dat files in archive)

    with bug fixes to maintain product

    Customer, TAC Product Quality Needed to ensure

    and maintain

    current market

    position

    Device support in

    RME is essential to

    closing hardware

    deals.

    NA Needed as stop gap

    and holdover to

    transition to next gen

    RME

    Impact on

    sustaining EMBU

    revenues and

    commitment to

    LMS/RWAN/SNMS

    /VMS bundles

    (approx 12k units

    FY03)

    Mkt = YES NA part of

    LMS, VMS,

    RWAN,

    SNMS

    Dev =

    26

    Yes, RME

    NG

    Project CC,

    EC 8/02,

    FCS 12/02

    GO

    Campus Manager 3.3- minor

    feature release including SSL

    support, moving ANI from CMF to

    CM, performance improvements and

    PERs requests to UT, Path Trace

    and Topo Services

    Customer,

    TAC, Field

    Sales

    EMBU Eng.

    Move ANI from

    CMF and SSL

    support for

    coexistence with

    RME

    OV and others are

    starting to nip at

    the edges with

    more L2

    capabilities

    Helps with overall

    market share in

    regards to L2

    campus

    functionality

    (VLAN, UT areas)

    Campus is being

    used more in

    enterprise

    production

    networks, Fidelity,

    Travelers, Hancock,

    Oracle rely heavily

    on Topo services

    and UT applications

    now for day-to-day

    NA Product has been

    "stale" since 3.x

    release, no new

    features have been

    addressed in over 24

    months, customers are

    concerned with viability

    of the product moving

    forward.

    Impact on

    sustaining EMBU

    revenues and

    commitment to

    large enterprise

    customers such as;

    Disney, Oracle,

    Fidelity..

    little or no

    impact,

    customer

    commits

    LMS bundle

    (approx 5k units

    FY03)

    Mkt = YES NA part of

    LMS

    Dev = 6 NO Project CC,

    EC 8/02,

    FCS 12/02

    GO

    CWW 6.x -minor refresh to include

    WUG 8.0 to stay current with

    Ipswitch product offering.

    Customer Stay current with

    Ipswitch WUG

    version only

    A lot of low end

    products are

    gaining share in

    this area ie. Solar

    Popular with low

    end SMB and

    channel

    Yes NA Minimal impact Approx 5M annual

    revenue stream

    none 2-3k units per

    year

    Mkt = YES 5M Dev = 1

    Tst =?

    SNMS Targeted

    FCS

    Q3FY03

    Delay

    Incremental Device Updates 1.x -quarterly device updates and bug

    fixes posted to CCO

    Customer,TAC, Hardware

    BU

    Address overalldevice support

    backlog for

    RME, Campus,

    DFM

    Required to helpstay current with

    new devices

    NA No, several largedeals require

    knowledge

    availability and

    commitment to

    device support,

    NA IDUs are quarterlyupdates and are TIME

    driven releases, they

    cannot be delayed

    Severe impact onhardware sales and

    BU commits

    NA, timebased

    Unknown Mkt = YES NA Dev =11

    NO Quarterlyupdates

    GO

    CiscoView Dev ice Packages-

    ongoing support for new CiscoView

    device packages

    Customer,

    TAC, Hardware

    BU

    New feature set

    management BU

    driven (ie

    Emblade)

    Required to help

    stay current with

    new devices

    Huge insta lled

    base

    Helps sell and

    showcase device

    features in

    competitive

    No Device, BU driven,

    delay could impact

    potential sales

    Severe impact on

    hardware sales and

    BU commits

    NA, time

    based

    LMS, RWAN,

    SNMS, CWW,

    CW4MW, CWM,

    CEMF, Cable

    Mkt = YES NA Dev =

    35

    NO As needed GO

    LMS 2.2 - bundle refresh that

    serves as delivery vehicles for all of

    the sustaining projects listed aboveplus RTM and DFM , Target FCS

    12/02

    Customer,

    Field Sales,

    TAC, HardwareBU, EMBU

    Revenue

    Buys time for

    transition to NG

    product,necessary

    security features

    for CM

    Treading water. Large installed

    base.

    No, see product

    commitments above.

    NA Customer satisfaction

    quality, prolongs

    transition if delayed

    Severe impact on

    hardware sales and

    overall satisfaction

    Could

    improve

    overallschedules to

    deliver next

    gen if

    FY03 = 6000

    (includes UPG, P1

    and UPTs)

    Mktng = YES 40 - 50 M NO FCS Dec 02,

    needed to

    maintainLMS rev

    stream

    GO

    SNMS 1.1- bundle refresh to

    include RME 3.5 and CV 6.0 and

    CMF 2.2, Target FCS 2/03

    Customer,

    Field Sales,

    TAC, Hardware

    BU, EMBU

    Revenue

    Puts SNMS on

    same version

    release of

    current shipping

    RME

    Provides overall

    competitive

    diffentiator at low

    end especially

    against Hua-Wei

    New product

    gaining

    momentum with

    Channels.

    Yes, but provides

    unparalleled

    capabilities for SMB

    customers.

    NA Causes more issues

    with EMBU eng, as we

    would need to support

    two version of RME in

    the field.

    Additional support

    costs, far outweigh

    the effort of rolling

    the bundle.

    600 to 1000 Mkt = YES 5 M NO FCS 3/03 GO

    RME for Cable - New cable

    management functionality for RME

    including, Netconfig, Configlets and

    Netshow reports. Target FCS 8/02

    Customers,

    Hardware BU

    Enables

    competitive

    advantage for

    provisioning inCable Mgmnt

    This allows Cisco

    cable devices to

    be configured

    more easilyimproving overall

    Yes and no. Greatly

    improves chances of

    selling Cisco Cable

    solutions in Tier 1MSOs.

    Unknown Time to market is one

    reason RME was

    chosen for the cable

    config functionality

    unknown none Mktn = YES

    (Cable team)

    Dev = 1 NO No EMBU

    resources

    required

    GO

    RME CEMF Integration P1- basic

    integration including device import

    and launch facilities. Concept

    committed 6/02, EC 7/02, FCS

    SP Customers INSMBU commit Provides key

    functionality to

    CEMF OSS

    Strategy

    Yes No Mktn = YES

    in conjunction

    with INSMBU

    Dev = 1 GO

    RME for Andiamo - basic device

    support for new storage

    management device. Concept

    Committed,has this been EC'd

    Customers,

    Hardware BU

    BU commitment Helps provide

    needed mgmnt

    functionality to be

    competitive

    New product Don't know. Unknown commitment at BU level unknown GO

    New Projects- includes all newprojects that are under investigation

    or that will be concept committed,

    execution committed and or FCS in

    FY03

    Customer,Field Sales,

    TAC, Hardware

    BU, EMBU

    Revenue

    New revenueopportunities,

    enablement of

    hardware sales,

    improved

    customer

    see individualprojects below

    Mgmnt Intranet II,new UI and

    security features

    will enhance and

    improve overall

    messaging and

    see individualprojects below

    see individual projectsbelow

    see individualprojects below

    GO

    CiscoView 6.x - improved

    usability, performance and

    lightweight client (removal of

    required plugin). Concept

    Committed, EC 9/02, FCS Q3FY03

    Customer

    (performance,

    usability), Field

    Sales,

    Hardware BU

    Next Gen UI,

    security and

    coexistence with

    other NG

    products. CIDS

    enabled, impacts

    other Cisco

    bundles.

    Raises the bar on

    the competition in

    regards to robust

    element mgmnt

    functionality.

    Merges best of

    embedded and

    non-embedded

    Gain market

    share in new

    features and

    intranet II

    messaging.

    Yes, initially

    customers can use

    5.x until full

    transition to NG 6.0

    is completed approx

    12 months

    No Pushes out the NG

    strategy and delivery of

    new capabilities. Will

    have impact on

    customer satisfaction

    and other NG

    programs.

    Serious impact on

    new messaging and

    will impact BU ability

    to generate new

    revenue.

    Targeted for

    Q3FY03

    accel would

    not help as it

    depends on

    availability of

    RME 3.5

    program for

    SNMS, LMS,

    RWAN, CW4MW,

    CWM, Cable

    (approx 5k units)

    Mktng = Yes NA Dev = 1 Yes, CV

    5.x, and

    embedded

    Concept

    Commit 5/02,

    EC 9/02,

    FCS 4/03

    GO

    CiscoView Embedded - platform

    for building embedded management

    functionality for new Cisco devices

    and modules. This is needed to

    bring consistency across new

    services being added to Cisco

    switches. Initial CC with evolution

    from Brinks project.

    Field Sales,

    Hardware BU

    Catalyst 6k

    service blade

    requirements,

    Brinks project for

    security

    Many of our

    competitors in

    VPN/Security and

    other L2/L3

    services are

    providing fairly

    robust embedded

    management

    functionality. It is

    imperative to

    showcase the

    competitive

    features via an

    "HTTP" session

    Depends upon

    the specific

    funtional area.

    This should help

    improve overall

    market share.

    Yes, but it will

    should help to

    accelerate sales. In

    the low end SMB

    market it might

    actually defer sales.

    No Puts more pressure on

    Bus to develop their

    own embedded

    management apps if not

    delivered this year with

    initial platform targeted

    towards the Brinks

    project.

    Business Units will

    fund their own

    embedded

    development,

    consistency across

    platforms will be

    lost.

    minimal Tied to hardware

    sales of Cat6k

    and service

    blades

    Mktng = Yes None Dev = 5 Yes, CV

    NG team

    will work

    on this.

    Concept

    Commit 8/02

    w/Brinks

    team?

    GO

    RME (4.0) Next Gen- majorfeature release including new UI,

    long awaited security features,

    integration w/ACS, performance

    improvements, scalability

    improvements, basic APIs and

    enables new packaging for large

    enterprise SP market segments. CC

    Q1FY03, EC Q1FY03, FCS Q4FY03

    Customer,Field Sales,

    EMBU

    Revenue

    Large Enterpriseand SP

    customer

    satisfaction

    issues.

    Conitnued delay

    in delivery of key

    functions in

    secured views

    will have impact

    on EMBU

    credibility.

    Foundry IronView(INM) provides

    extensive

    role/group, config

    and change

    management and

    SNMPv3 support.http:/ /www.foundry networks

    .com/products/networkman/i

    ronview/datasheet. html

    RME NG will allowCisco to maintain

    and revitalize

    market share

    through new

    Management

    Intranet 2

    messaging

    including common

    management

    data.

    Yes, howevercontinuing to push

    out high priority

    requirements

    addressed by NG

    will have impact on

    future hardware

    sales at large

    enterprise

    customers including:

    USPS, AT&T, Sprint,

    Chase, WFB,

    Boeing, Intel,

    Oracle, Fidelity etc.

    No Serious customersatisfaction issues will

    arise as well as field

    sales confidence in the

    BU ability to provide

    timely enhancements to

    critical feature sets.

    Many of the proposed

    features ie. secured

    views have been put off

    for over 2 years

    already!!!

    Severe customerdissatisfaction,

    possible delay in

    hardware

    purchases and

    revenue to Cisco,

    EMBU engineering

    retention issues

    Would havepositive

    impact on

    overall

    messaging

    but

    dependent

    upon RME

    3.x

    maintenance

    train.

    LMS, RWAN,SNMS, VMS and

    new LE bundle

    (approx. 1k units

    if ship in 6/03)

    Mktng = Yes Approx1.5M if

    ship in

    Q4FY03.

    Dev =23

    GO

    RME NorthBound API's -provides a suite of NB APIs with

    appropriate documentation and

    support to allow both internal BUs

    and external third parties and

    customers to leverage RME

    backend services via NB APIs. . This

    will help us differentiate a Cisco

    Network in SP's by allowing better

    integration with NMS/OSS. CC

    Q2FY03, EC Q3FY03, FCS FHFY04

    ServiceProvider,

    Large

    Enterprise

    Third Party ISVs,Managed

    Service

    Providers

    (Verizon, AT&T)

    Could gainsignificant market

    share in large

    enterprise,

    service provider

    and managed

    provider market

    segments.

    Yes, but will addsignificant value in

    situations where the

    customer wants to

    integrate our

    solution into a home

    grown app or an

    NMS/OSS solution.

    No Customer's in the LEand SP space will have

    to invest in building

    and maintaining their

    own scripts to meet

    basic mgmnt needs.

    Loss of opportunityin the SP space.

    Also will result in a

    lot of overlapping

    functionality bein

    developed in

    different parts of

    the BU and Cisco.

    Mktng = No Delay

    Advanced Management

    Services- best of Campus, VLAN

    config, User Tracking, improved

    Topo based upon NG UI, securityservices, CMD. Concept Commit

    Q4FY03, FCS Q2FY04.

    Customer,

    Field Sales

    Will help offset

    other L2

    momentum from

    HP and others

    (iManage HauWei)

    Maintain current

    market share at a

    minimum may

    increase with MI2

    messaging.

    Yes Topo

    only

    maybe.

    minimal Impact on abilty to

    provide important

    customer used

    capabilities, would

    severely impact

    overall customer

    none FY04 = 2,400 M - No 4.8 M CC FY03,

    FCS 04Delay

    SNMS 2.0 - new version of SNMS

    targeted at SMB and channel

    market segment. Cooperative effort

    between DSBU, PCG and EMBU.

    Includes CMF, CV 6.x, RME 4.x and

    WUG with improved "my Ciscoworks"

    UI for novice users. CC Q2FY03,

    EC Q2FY03, FCS Q4FY03 w/new

    17xx router platforms.

    Customer,

    Field Sales,

    Hardware BU

    SMB, DSBU,

    Comercial

    Solar Winds, Hua

    Wei. This will

    provide clear

    differentiation at

    low end for Cisco.

    Gain market

    share in new

    features and

    intranet II

    messaging.

    Yes, but will help

    accelerate sales for

    low end switches

    and routers.

    Unknown Miss opportunity to

    cooperatively market

    with new router platform

    launch.

    none FY03 = 200

    FY04 = 5000

    Mktng = Yes GO

    Performance Mgmnt - investigate

    delivery of new basic performance

    management functionality for WAN.

    Many customers have requested

    Cisco to provide a set of baseline

    performance monitoring and

    reporting capabilities.

    Field Sales,

    EMBU

    Revenue

    Strong competition

    from products like

    Lucent'sVitalSuite. The

    lack of cisco

    offerings in this

    area allows Lucent

    to enter Cisco

    accounts.

    Improve market

    share and full

    FCAPsfunctionality for

    the enterprise.

    Field bids with non

    Cisco products.

    Run into competitiveissues with other

    vendors like

    Netscout.

    Yes None, since we do not

    have an offering in this

    space.

    NA Greater

    barriers to

    entry forcompetition.

    More

    complete

    solution from

    Cisco should

    improve

    customer

    FY04 = 2,400 NO Approx.

    10M in

    FY04

    possibly

    with NAMDelay

    Branch Office Agent- The BOA

    provides us a solution to providing a

    decentralized, store and forward

    kind of solution for managing very

    distributed environments. An

    example would be a department

    store like Walmart which has acentral office and thousands of

    Customer,

    Field Sales

    Large Retail,

    WalMart, Home

    Depot, State

    Farm etc.

    M - No Delay

    Multicast- Configuration,

    monitoring and troubleshooting of

    multicast environments are getting

    to be more important with the

    Customer,

    Field Sales

    Fidelity No competitive

    pressure.

    Opportunity to

    lead with a quality

    N - Mktg, N -

    DevDelay

    Asset Mgmnt Customer N - Mktg, N - Delay

    Tools Program- This is a program

    which will help provide a way to

    provide scripts, utilities, tools which

    add value to the CiscoWorks

    products. These may be developed

    in the field, by our Dev teams or 3rdparty. By providing this to our field

    and channel we will help them

    provide a better value to customers

    at the same time not adding to our

    dev or support costs.

    M - No Delay

    N - Mktg, N -

    DevDelay

    N - Mktg, N - Delay