06-14-16 PC Final Packet Items 1-34

8/15/2019 06-14-16 PC Final Packet Items 1-34

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/06-14-16-pc-final-packet-items-1-34 1/694

Planning Commission June 14, 2016 - Page 1

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

COUNCIL CHAMBERS · 495 SOUTH MAIN STREET · PHONE 229-6011

CITY OF LAS VEGAS INTERNET ADDRESS: www.lasvegasnevada.gov

LAS VEGAS CITY COUNCIL

Mayor Carolyn G. Goodman, (At-Large)

Mayor Pro-Tem Steven D. Ross, (Ward 6)

Councilwoman Lois Tarkanian, (Ward 1)

Councilman Ricki Y. Barlow (Ward 5)

Councilman Stavros S. Anthony, (Ward 4)

Councilman Bob Coffin, (Ward 3)

Councilman Bob Beers, (Ward 2)

City Manager Elizabeth N. Fretwell

COMMISSIONERS

Todd L. Moody, Chair

Trinity Haven Schlottman, Vice Chair

Vicki Quinn

Gus W. Flangas

Glen Trowbridge

Cedric Crear

Sam Cherry

Facilities are provided throughout City Hall for convenience of persons with disabilities. For meetings held in the

Council Chambers, sound equipment is available for persons with hearing impairments. Reasonable efforts will be

made to assist and accommodate persons with disabilities or impairments. If you need an accommodation toattend and participate in this meeting, please call the DEPARTMENT DESIGNEE at 702-229-6301 and

advise of your need at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Dial 7-1-1 for Relay Nevada.

June 14, 20166:00 PM

ITEMS MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF THE ORDER PRESENTED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIRPERSON. TWO OR

MORE AGENDA ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION MAY BE COMBINED; AND ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA MAY BE

REMOVED OR RELATED DISCUSSION MAY BE DELAYED AT ANY TIME. BACKUP MATERIAL FOR THIS AGENDA

MAY BE OBTAINED FROM CHRYSTAL JACOBS, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, 333 NORTH RANCHO DRIVE, 3RD

FLOOR, (702)-229-6301 OR ON THE CITY’S WEBPAGE AT www.lasvegasnevada.gov.

NOTICE: This meeting has been properly noticed and posted at the following locations:

City Hall, 495 South Main Street, 1st Floor

Clark County Government Center, 500 South Grand Central Parkway

Grant Sawyer Building, 555 East Washington Avenue

City of Las Vegas Development Services Center, 333 North Rancho Drive

ACTIONS: ALL ACTIONS EXCEPT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS, REZONINGS AND RELATED CASES

THERETO ARE FINAL UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED BY THE APPLICANT OR AN

AGGRIEVED PERSON, OR A REVIEW IS REQUESTED BY A MEMBER OF THE CITY

COUNCIL WITHIN TEN DAYS AND PAYMENT OF THOSE COSTS SHALL BE MADE UPON

FILING OF THE APPLICATION.

ANY ITEM LISTED IN THIS AGENDA MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF ORDER IF SO REQUESTED

BY THE APPLICANT, STAFF, OR A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND

AGREED TO BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY

IMPOSE TIME LIMITATIONS, AS NECESSARY, ON THOSE PERSONS WISHING TO BE

HEARD ON ANY AGENDAED ITEM.




PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RULES OF CONDUCT:

1. Staff will present each item to the Commission in order as shown on the agenda, along with a recommendation and

suggested conditions of approval, if appropriate.

2.

The applicant is asked to be at the public microphone during the staff presentation. When the staff presentation is

complete, the applicant should state his name and address, and indicate whether or not he accepts staff’s conditions of

approval.

3.

If areas of concern are known in advance, or if the applicant does not accept staff’s condition, the applicant or his

representative is invited to make a brief presentation of his item with emphasis on any items of concern.

4. Persons other than the applicant who support the request are invited to make brief statements after the applicant. If

more than one supporter is present, comments should not be repetitive. A representative is welcome to speak and

indicate that he speaks for others in the audience who share his view.

5. Objectors to the item will be heard after the applicant and any other supporters. All who wish to speak will be heard,

but in the interest of time it is suggested that representatives be selected who can summarize the views of any groups

of interested parties.

6.

After all objectors’ input has been received; the applicant will be invited to respond to any new issues raised.

7.

Following the applicant’s response, the public hearing will be closed; Commissioners will discuss the item amongst

themselves, ask any questions they feel are appropriate, and proceed to a motion and decision on the matter.

8.

Letters, petitions, photographs and other submissions to the Commission will be retained for the record. Large maps,

models and other materials may be displayed to the Commission from the microphone area, but need not be handed in

for the record unless requested by the Commission.

As a courtesy, we would ask those not speaking to be seated and not interrupt the speaker or the Commission. We appreciate

your courtesy and hope you will help us make your visit with the Commission a good and fair experience.

BUSINESS ITEMS:

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW

3. ROLL CALL

4. PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO MATTERS ON THE

AGENDA FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR

THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE

SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

5. FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING

OF MAY 10, 2016.

6. FOR POSSIBLE ACTION - Any Items from the Planning Commission, staff and/or the applicant wish to be stricken or

held in abeyance to a future meeting may be brought forward and acted upon at this time.

CONSENT ITEMS:

CONSENT ITEMS ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND MAY BE ENACTED BY ONE

MOTION. HOWEVER, ANY ITEM MAY BE DISCUSSED IF A COMMISSION MEMBER OR APPLICANT SO DESIRES.




7. EOT-64112 - EXTENSION OF TIME - APPLICANT/OWNER: HOP, LLC - For possible action on a request for an

Extension of Time of an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-53471) FOR A PROPOSED 17,321 SQUARE-FOOT

URBAN LOUNGE USE WITH 970 SQUARE FEET OF OUTSIDE SEATING AREA at 1310 South 3rd Street (APN

162-03-105-004), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin). Staff recommends APPROVAL.

8. TMP-64418 - TENTATIVE MAP - SUMMERLIN VILLAGE 26 - REVERENCE PHASE 2 -

APPLICANT/OWNER: PN II, INC. - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A 148-LOT SINGLE-

FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 46.09 acres on the west side of Clark County 215, approximately 1,200 feet

north of Lake Mead Boulevard (portions of APNs 137-14-501-005 and 137-14-601-002), P-C (Planned Community)Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-64391]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

9. TMP-64433 - TENTATIVE MAP - DURANGO/GRAND TETON SHOPPING CENTER - APPLICANT: FIRST

STREET DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: SSB PROPCO, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map

FOR A ONE-LOT COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION on 1.93 acres at the southwest corner of Ackerman Avenue and

Durango Drive (APN 125-08-806-003), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64085]. Staff recommends

APPROVAL.

10. TMP-64465 - TENTATIVE MAP - SANTA ROSA TOWNHOMES - SUMMERLIN VILLAGE 23B PARCEL AA

- APPLICANT: RYLAND HOMES NEVADA, LLC - OWNER: THE HOWARD HUGHES COMPANY, LLC -

For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A 202-LOT SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL

SUBDIVISION on 18.56 acres at the southeast corner of Fox Hills Drive and Far Hills Avenue (APN 137-27-717-001), P-

C (Planned Community) Zone [MF2 (Medium Density Multi-Family) Summerlin Special Land Use Designation], Ward 2

(Beers) [PRJ-64262]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

ONE MOTION - ONE VOTE

THE FOLLOWING ARE ITEMS THAT MAY BE CONSIDERED IN ONE MOTION/ONE VOTE. THEY ARE CONSIDERED

ROUTINE NON-PUBLIC AND PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS AND NON-PUBLIC HEARINGS

WILL BE OPENED AT ONE TIME. ANY PERSON REPRESENTING AN APPLICATION OR A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC

OR A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH THE CONDITIONS AND ALL

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR THE APPLICATION RECOMMENDED BY STAFF, SHOULD REQUEST TO HAVE

THAT ITEM REMOVED FROM THIS PART OF THE AGENDA.

11. SCD-64471 - MAJOR DEVIATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CALIDA RESIDENTIAL, LLC -OWNER: HINES INTERESTS LP, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Major Deviation of the Summerlin

Development Standards TO ALLOW 218 PARKING SPACES WHERE 261 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED

FOR A PROPOSED SPECIAL CARE FACILITY AND ASSISTED LIVING APARTMENTS on 11.01 acres at the north

corner of Desert Crossing Court and Center Crossing Road (APNs 138-19-419-006 and a portion of 138-30-113-011), P-C

(Planned Community) Zone [EC (Employment Center) Summerlin North Special Land Use Designation], Ward 2 (Beers)

[PRJ-64230]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

12. SUP-64268 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: THE BUTCHER BLOCK -

OWNER: MONACO PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A

PROPOSED BEER/WINE/COOLER ON AND OFF-SALE ESTABLISHMENT USE WITHIN AN EXISTING 3,241

SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT AND GENERAL RETAIL STORE at 6440 North Durango Drive, Suite #125 (APN

125-20-801-002), T-C (Town Center) Zone [SC (Service Commercial - Town Center) Town Center Special Land Use

Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64241]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

13. SUP-64491 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: GLEN RUBIN - OWNER:DOUGLAS B. KAYS, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 9,450

SQUARE-FOOT MOTORCYCLE/MOTOR SCOOTER SALES USE WITHIN AN EXISTING SWAP MEET at 1717

South Decatur Boulevard (APN 162-06-301-002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-64362].

Staff recommends APPROVAL.

14. SDR-64218 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS

VEGAS ICE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendment of an approved Site Development Plan

Review (SDR-41601) FOR A WAIVER OF THE DOWNTOWN CENTENNIAL PLAN STREETSCAPE STANDARDS

TO REMOVE REQUIRED PALM TREES AND REPLACE WITH SHRUBS OR SHADE TREES AT AN APPROVED

OFFICE DEVELOPMENT on 1.01 acres at 501 South Las Vegas Boulevard (APN 139-34-301-011), Ward 3 (Coffin)





15. VAC-64120 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - For possible

action on a request for a Petition to Vacate a portion of Moonlight Drive north of Charleston Boulevard, Ward 3 (Coffin)


16. VAC-64290 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: PRECEDENT

PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate a three-foot wide fire hydrant,

sewer line, street lighting and appurtenances easement generally located on the south side of Donald Road, west of

Decatur Boulevard, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64277]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

17. VAC-64394 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: WILLIAM LYON HOMES, INC. - For

possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate a 60-foot wide public drainage easement generally located west of

Coke Street, south of Alder Glen Avenue (Multiple APNs), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64393]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

18. ABEYANCE - GPA-63571 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:

JOHN M. BAILEY - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: DR (DESERT RURAL

DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) on 1.05 acres at 5455 North Rainbow Boulevard

(APN 125-35-101-005), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-63423]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

19. ABEYANCE - ZON-63573 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-63571 - PUBLIC HEARING -

APPLICANT/OWNER: JOHN M. BAILEY - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-E

(RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) on 1.05 acres at 5455 North Rainbow Boulevard (APN

125-35-101-005), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-63423]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

20. ABEYANCE - VAR-63817 - VARIANCE RELATED TO GPA-63571 AND ZON-63573 - PUBLIC HEARING -APPLICANT/OWNER: JOHN M. BAILEY - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 13-FOOT

REAR YARD SETBACK WHERE 20 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING BUILDING AND TO ALLOW A

FIVE-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK ON THE NORTH PERIMETER WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR A

PROPOSED CARPORT on 1.05 acres at 5455 North Rainbow Boulevard (APN 125-35-101-005), R-E (Residence

Estates) [PROPOSED: C-2 (General Commercial)] Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-63423]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

21. ABEYANCE - VAR-63891 - VARIANCE RELATED TO GPA-63571, ZON-63573 AND VAR-63817 - PUBLIC

HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JOHN M. BAILEY - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO

ALLOW A 17-FOOT RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY SETBACK WHERE 60 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR ANEXISTING BUILDING on 1.05 acres at 5455 North Rainbow Boulevard (APN 125-35-101-005), R-E (Residence Estates)

[PROPOSED: C-2 (General Commercial)] Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-63423]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

22. ABEYANCE - SUP-63574 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO GPA-63571, ZON-63573, VAR-63817 AND

VAR-63891 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JOHN M. BAILEY - For possible action on a request

for a Special Use Permit FOR DELIVERY AND SERVICE VEHICLE STORAGE USE at 5455 North Rainbow

Boulevard (APN 125-35-101-005), R-E (Residence Estates) [PROPOSED: C-2 (General Commercial)] Zone, Ward 4

(Anthony) [PRJ-63423]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

23. SUP-64653 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO GPA-63571, ZON-63573, VAR-63817, VAR-63891 AND

SDR-63575 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JOHN M. BAILEY - For possible action on a request for

a Special Use Permit FOR A BUILDING MAINTENANCE SERVICE AND SALES USE WITH OUTSIDE STORAGE

at 5455 North Rainbow Boulevard (APN 125-35-101-005), R-E (Residence Estates) [PROPOSED: C-2 (GeneralCommercial)] Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-63423]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

24. ABEYANCE - SDR-63575 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-63571, ZON-63573,

VAR-63817, VAR-63891 AND SUP-63574 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JOHN M. BAILEY -

For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 3,933 SQUARE-FOOT

OFFICE AND SERVICE VEHICLE USE WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE

BUFFER ALONG A PORTION OF THE NORTH PERIMETER AND A FIVE-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER

ALONG A PORTION OF THE SOUTH PERIMETER, WHERE MINIMUM EIGHT-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE

BUFFERS ARE REQUIRED on 1.05 acres at 5455 North Rainbow Boulevard (APN 125-35-101-005), R-E (Residence

Estates) [PROPOSED: C-2 (General Commercial)] Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-63423]. Staff recommends DENIAL.




25. ABEYANCE - VAR-63584 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: R M H

TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A CONNECTIVITY RATIO OF 1.0 WHERE 1.3

IS REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW NO AMENITY ZONE WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED

RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 1.90 acres at the northwest corner of Dorrell Lane and Decatur Boulevard (APN 125-

24-503-020), R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-63482]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

26. ABEYANCE - WVR-63585 - WAIVER RELATED TO VAR-63584 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR

HORTON - OWNER: R M H TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Waiver TO ALLOW A 187-FOOTEXTERNAL INTERSECTION OFFSET WHERE 220 FEET IS THE MINIMUM DISTANCE SEPARATION

REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW NO INTERIOR STREETLIGHTS WHERE SUCH ARE REQUIRED FOR A

PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 1.90 acres at the northwest corner of Dorrell Lane and Decatur

Boulevard (APN 125-24-503-020), R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-63482]. Staff recommends

DENIAL.

27. ABEYANCE - TMP-63586 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO VAR-63584 AND WVR-63585 - DECATUR &

DONALD II - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: R M H TRUST - For possible action

on a request for a Tentative Map FOR AN EIGHT-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 1.90

acres at the northwest corner of Dorrell Lane and Decatur Boulevard (APN 125-24-503-020), R-1 (Single Family

Residential) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-63482]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

28. ABEYANCE - VAR-63577 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER:

LEXINGTON PARTNERS LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW NO AMENITYZONE WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 11.86 acres adjacent to

the north side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 425 feet west of Decatur Boulevard (APNs Multiple), R-1 (Single Family



HORTON - OWNER: LEXINGTON PARTNERS LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Waiver TO

ALLOW A 154-FOOT EXTERNAL INTERSECTION OFFSET WHERE 220 FEET IS THE MINIMUM DISTANCE

SEPARATION REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW NO INTERIOR STREETLIGHTS WHERE SUCH ARE REQUIRED

FOR A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 11.86 acres adjacent to the north side of Dorrell Lane,

approximately 425 feet west of Decatur Boulevard (APNs Multiple), R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross)

[PRJ-63479]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

30. ABEYANCE - TMP-63580 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO VAR-63577 AND WVR-63579 - DECATUR &DONALD I - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: LEXINGTON PARTNERS LLC, ET

AL - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A 57-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

SUBDIVISION on 11.86 acres adjacent to the north side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 425 feet west of Decatur

Boulevard (APNs Multiple), R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-63479]. Staff recommends

DENIAL.

31. ABEYANCE - VAR-63587 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER:PRECEDENT PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A CONNECTIVITY

RATIO OF 1.0 WHERE 1.3 IS REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW NO AMENITY ZONE WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED

FOR A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 2.10 acres at the southeast corner of Dorrell Lane and Unicorn

Street (APN 125-24-602-001), R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-63483]. Staff recommends

DENIAL.


HORTON - OWNER: PRECEDENT PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Waiver TO

ALLOW A 183-FOOT EXTERNAL INTERSECTION OFFSET WHERE 220 FEET IS THE MINIMUM DISTANCE

SEPARATION REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW NO INTERIOR STREETLIGHTS WHERE SUCH ARE REQUIRED

FOR A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 2.10 acres at the southeast corner of Dorrell Lane and Unicorn

Street (APN 125-24-602-001), R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-63483]. Staff recommends

DENIAL.




33. ABEYANCE - TMP-63589 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO VAR-63587 AND WVR-63588 - DECATUR &

DONALD III - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: PRECEDENT PROPERTIES,LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR AN EIGHT-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

SUBDIVISION on 2.10 acres at the southeast corner of Dorrell Lane and Unicorn Street (APN 125-24-602-001), R-1

(Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-63483]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

34. ABEYANCE - SUP-63935 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/ OWNER: YIZHAQ

ROZOLYO - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED SHORT-TERMRESIDENTIAL RENTAL USE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 560-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A

SIMILAR USE WHERE 660 FEET IS REQUIRED at 557 Canosa Avenue (APN 162-03-314-023), R-1 (Single Family

Residential) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-63934]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

35. GPA-64013 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: OLYMPIA COMPANIES

- OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - For possible action on a request to Amend the Master Plan of Streets and

Highways TO REALIGN SHEEP MOUNTAIN PARKWAY BETWEEN GRAND TETON DRIVE AND KYLE

CANYON ROAD , REDUCE NORTH SKYE CANYON PARK DRIVE FROM A PARKWAY ARTERIAL (120') TO A

PRIMARY ARTERIAL (100') NORTH OF IRON MOUNTAIN ROAD, AND TO MODIFY THE GRAND CANYON-

IRON MOUNTAIN ROAD ALIGNMENT TO A MAJOR COLLECTOR (80') FROM WEST SKYE CANYON PARK

DRIVE TO PULI ROAD WITHIN THE SKYE CANYON MASTER PLAN AREA, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-63928]. Staff

recommends APPROVAL.

36. VAR-63963 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: OLYMPIA COMPANIES - OWNER: MFLAND, LLC. - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW NATURAL WASHES WHERE LOW

FLOW CONCRETE CHANNNELS ARE REQUIRED within the Skye Canyon Master Planned Community (APN's:

Multiple), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-63928]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

37. DIR-63962 - DIRECTOR'S BUSINESS - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: OLYMPIA COMPANIES -

OWNER: MF LAND, LLC - For possible action on a request to amend the Development Agreement for the Skye

Canyon Development on approximately 1,664 acres at the southwest corner of Fort Apache Road and Moccasin Road

(APNs Multiple), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-63928]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

38. MOD-63387 - MAJOR MODIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JIM MARSH

AMERICAN CORPORATION - For possible action on a request for a Major Modification of the Town Center Land

Use Plan FROM: SX-TC (SUBURBAN MIXED USE - TOWN CENTER) TO: GC-TC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL -

TOWN CENTER) on 4.88 acres at the southwest corner of Centennial Parkway and Riley Street (APN 125-29-502-002),Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-63386]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

39. VAC-63563 - VACATION RELATED TO MOD-63387 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JIM

MARSH AMERICAN CORPORATION - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate Riley Street between

Centennial Parkway and Regena Avenue and Regena Avenue west of Riley Street, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-63386]. Staff

recommends DENIAL.

40. VAC-64265 - VACATION RELATED TO MOD-63387 AND VAC-63563 - PUBLIC HEARING -

APPLICANT/OWNER: JIM MARSH AMERICAN CORPORATION - For possible action on a request for a Petition

to Vacate U.S. Government Patent Easements on property located at the southwest corner of Centennial Parkway and

Riley Street (APN 125-29-502-002), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-63386]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

41. SDR-63389 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO MOD-63387, VAC-63563 AND VAC-64265- PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JIM MARSH AMERICAN CORPORATION - For possible action

on a request for a Major Amendment to an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-40077) TO ADD 219,081

SQUARE FEET TO AN APPROVED MOTOR VEHICLE SALES (NEW) USE WITH A WAIVER OF ALL THE

TOWN CENTER PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS AND A WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT

WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE SOUTH PERIMETER WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED on 4.88 acres at

the southwest corner of Centennial Parkway and Riley Street (APN 125-29-502-002), T-C (Town Center) Zone [SX-TC

(Suburban Mixed Use - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation] [PROPOSED: GC-TC (General Commercial -

Town Center) Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-63386]. Staff recommends DENIAL.






50. VAR-64481 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: MESQUITEWOOD, LLC - For possible

action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW ZERO ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES WHERE 36 ADDITIONAL

PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR A BANQUET FACILITY AT A PARKING-IMPAIRED DEVELOPMENT

on 0.56 acres at 418 West Mesquite Avenue (APN 139-27-401-023), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-64470].

Staff recommends DENIAL.

51. VAR-64650 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-64481 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:

MESQUITEWOOD, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW AN EIGHT-FOOT TALLFRONT YARD FENCE WHERE FIVE FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.56 acres at 418 West Mesquite Avenue (APN 139-27-

401-023), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-64470]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

52. VAR-64031 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: NEVILLE C EMERTON AND JULIA

E MORRE - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A THREE-FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK

AND A FIVE-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING 160 SQUARE-

FOOT ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (CLASS II) [POOL EQUIPMENT SHED] on 0.47 acres at 7521 Cedargulf Avenue

(APN 125-15-412-025), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-62335]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

53. VAR-64304 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - OWNER/APPLICANT: CHARLES WRIDGE BENNION SR.

AND TIFFANY LYNN DENSLEY - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A FOUR-FOOT SIDE

YARD SETBACK FOR AN EXISTING TWO-STORY ADDITION WHERE FIVE FEET IS REQUIRED at 4900

Sunbrite Avenue (APN 138-12-515-012), R-PD4 (Residential Planned Development - 4 Units Per Acre) Zone, Ward 5

(Barlow) [PRJ-64229]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

54. VAR-64311 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: PN II, INC. - For possible action on a

request for a Variance TO ALLOW THE STREET NAME "REVERENCE" TO COEXIST WITH THE EXISTING

STREET NAME "REFERENCE" WHERE STREET NAMES THAT SOUND ALIKE CANNOT BE USED on 285.06

acres at the northwest corner of Clark County 215 and Lake Mead Boulevard (APNs 137-13-101-007; 137-14-501-005

and 137-14-601-002), P-C (Planned Community) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-64232]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

55. VAR-64454 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: VICENTE SAN JUAN - For possible

action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A TEN-FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK WHERE 15 FEET IS

REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING 589 SQUARE-FOOT SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ADDITION AND TO ALLOW

AN EXISTING 276 SQUARE-FOOT ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (CLASS II) [CARPORT] AT THREE FEET FROM

THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE WHERE SIX FEET IS REQUIRED; A TWO-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE

THREE FEET IS REQUIRED; A FIFTEEN-FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK WHERE 20 FEET IS REQUIRED ANDTO BE LOCATED IN THE FRONT YARD, WHERE SUCH IS NOT ALLOWED at 1029 North Tonopah Drive (APN

139-29-611-034), R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-64132]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

56. VAR-64466 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TEN 15 HUNTRIDGE, LLC - For

possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 60-FOOT TALL FREESTANDING SIGN WHERE 40 FEET

IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED AND TO ALLOW 1,032 SQUARE FEET OF SIGNAGE AREA WHERE 898

SQUARE FEET IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED on 4.3 acres located at the southwest corner of Charleston Boulevard

and Maryland Parkway (APN 162-03-513-008), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-64274]. Staff

recommends DENIAL.

57. SUP-64430 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CHARTER SCHOOLS

DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - OWNER: C K W Y VEGAS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a

Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED PUBLIC OR PRIVATE SCHOOL, PRIMARY USE at 900 North LambBoulevard (APN 140-30-601-016), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-64384]. Staff recommends

DENIAL.

58. SDR-64431 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-64430 - PUBLIC HEARING -

APPLICANT: CHARTER SCHOOLS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - OWNER: C K W Y VEGAS, LLC -

For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING 48,280

SQUARE-FOOT SHOPPING CENTER TO A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE SCHOOL, PRIMARY USE on 3.96 acres at 900

North Lamb Boulevard (APN 140-30-601-016), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-64384]. Staff

recommends DENIAL.




59. SUP-64351 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SOUTHWESTCO WIRELESS LP,

DBA VERIZON WIRELESS - OWNER: TONOPAH PARTNERS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a

Special Use Permit FOR PROPOSED 77-FOOT TALL CELLULAR COMMUNICATION FACILITIES (TOWER) at

2100 West Charleston Boulevard (APN 139-32-804-013), PD (Planned Development) Zone [SC (Service Commercial)

Las Vegas Medical District Special Land Use Designation], Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-64309]. Staff recommends

DENIAL.

60. SUP-64408 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: MASSAGE 1 - OWNER: MONACO

PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 1,664 SQUARE-FOOT MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A DISTANCE SEPARATION OF 141 FEET

FROM A SIMILAR USE WHERE 1,000 FEET IS REQUIRED AND A WAIVER TO ALLOW A DISTANCE

SEPARATION OF 108 FEET FROM A RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE 400 FEET IS REQUIRED at 6446 North

Durango Drive, Suite #130 (APN 125-20-801-002), T-C (Town Center) Zone [SC-TC (Service Commercial - Town

Center) Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64165]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

61. SUP-64443 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: COMPASSIONATE TEAM OF LAS

VEGAS, LLC - OWNER: 2006 ROBERT SCOTT CARL LIVING TRUST - For possible action on a request for a

Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 10,920 SQUARE-FOOT MEDICAL MARIJUANA CULTIVATION FACILITY

at 2603, 2605 and 2607 Highland Drive (APN 162-09-110-016), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-64303].

Staff recommends APPROVAL.

62. SUP-64458 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: PLATINUM MANAGEMENTGROUP 2, LLC - OWNER: FARID MAHBOBIAN-FARD, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Special

Use Permit FOR A BEER/WINE/COOLER OFF-SALE ESTABLISHMENT WITHIN A PROPOSED 2,700 SQUARE-

FOOT GENERAL RETAIL STORE, OTHER THAN LISTED at 1958 East Charleston Boulevard (APN 162-02-512-

007), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-64392]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

63. SUP-64482 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BOULEVARD MEDICAL, LLC -

OWNER: FLORESTA INC. - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 11,040

SQUARE-FOOT MEDICAL MARIJUANA CULTIVATION FACILITY WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW THE

MEDICAL MARIJUANA CULTIVATION USE UNDER THE SAME ROOF AS ANOTHER USE at 3070 Sirius

Avenue, Suite #103 (APN 162-08-303-032), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-64426]. Staff recommends

APPROVAL.

64. SUP-64483 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BOULEVARD MEDICAL, LLC -

OWNER: FLORESTA INC. - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 1,960SQUARE-FOOT MEDICAL MARIJUANA PRODUCTION FACILITY WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW THE

MEDICAL MARIJUANA PRODUCTION USE UNDER THE SAME ROOF AS ANOTHER USE at 3070 Sirius

Avenue, Suite #103 (APN 162-08-303-032), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-64427]. Staff recommends

APPROVAL.

65. SDR-64467 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BUFFALO

ACQUISITION PARTNERS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A 230

SPACE PARKING LOT on 2.17 acres on the north side of Trinity Peak Avenue, 219 feet east of Buffalo Drive (APN

138-15-310-056), C-PB (Planned Business Park) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-64383]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

66. SDR-64479 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: OPPORTUNITY

VILLAGE - OWNER: STATE OF NEVADA DIVISION OF LANDS - For possible action on a request for a Site

Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 22,720 SQUARE-FOOT EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING SOCIALSERVICE PROVIDER, REVISED BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS, WITH A

WAIVER TO ALLOW A FOUR-FOOT PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG PORTIONS OF THE SOUTH

PROPERTY LINE WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED on 6.94 acres at 6300 West Oakey Boulevard (APN 163-02-601-

005), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-64414]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

67. SDR-64484 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:

OMNINET 3300 SAHARA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A

PROPOSED PARKING LOT EXPANSION AND RECONFIGURATION WITH WAIVERS OF THE PERIMETER

LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO ALLOW 10 FEET TO THE SOUTH AND FIVE FEET TO THE EAST WHERE 15 FEET

IS REQUIRED on 9.42 acres at the northwest corner of Spanish Oaks Drive and Sahara Avenue (APNs 162-05-402-010

and -011), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-64412]. Staff recommends DENIAL.




DIRECTOR'S BUSINESS:

68. TXT-64667 - TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - For

possible action on a request to amend LVMC 19.12.070 related to the Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use to amend the

conditions under which a waiver of the distance separation requirement may be requested, and to provide for other related

matters. Staff has NO RECOMMENDATION.

CITIZENS PARTICIPATION:

69. CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE

LIMITED TO MATTERS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. NO SUBJECT MAY

BE ACTED UPON BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION UNLESS THAT SUBJECT IS ON THE AGENDA AND IS

SCHEDULED FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME

FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION ON ANY SINGLE SUBJECT, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT

OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED



Agenda Item No.: 1.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: JUNE 14, 2016

DEPARTMENT: PLANNING

DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO

SUBJECT:

CALL TO ORDER



Agenda Item No.: 2.





SUBJECT:

ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW



Agenda Item No.: 3.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: JUNE 14, 2016



SUBJECT:

ROLL CALL



Agenda Item No.: 4.





SUBJECT:

PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO

MATTERS ON THE AGENDA FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO

THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF

DISCUSSION, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS

ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED



Agenda Item No.: 5.





SUBJECT:

FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING

COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 10, 2016.



Agenda Item No.: 6.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: JUNE 14, 2016


DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:

FOR POSSIBLE ACTION - Any items from the Planning Commission, staff and/or the

applicant wish to be stricken or held in abeyance to a future meeting may be brought forward andacted upon at this time.



Agenda Item No.: 7.





SUBJECT:EOT-64112 - EXTENSION OF TIME - APPLICANT/OWNER: HOP, LLC - For possible

action on a request for an Extension of Time of an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-53471)

FOR A PROPOSED 17,321 SQUARE-FOOT URBAN LOUNGE USE WITH 970 SQUAREFEET OF OUTSIDE SEATING AREA at 1310 South 3rd Street (APN 162-03-105-004), C-2

(General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin). Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 7/20/2016

OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location and Aerial Maps2. Conditions and Staff Report

3. Supporting Documentation4. Photo(s)5. Justification Letter

6. Action Letter for SUP-53471







EOT-64112

JB

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: JUNE 14, 2016


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: HOP, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE

NUMBERRECOMMENDATION

REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

EOT-64112 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 5

NOTICES MAILED N/A

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

** CONDITIONS **

EOT-64112 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. This Special Use Permit (SUP-53471) shall expire on May 13, 2018 unless anotherExtension of Time is approved by the City Council.

2. Conformance to the conditions of approval of the Special Use Permit (SUP-53471) and allother site related actions as required by the Department of Planning and Department of

Public Works.



EOT-64112

JB

Staff Report Page One

June 14, 2016 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for an Extension of Time for approved Special Use Permit (SUP-53471) for a

proposed 17,321 square-foot Urban Lounge use with 970 square feet of outside seating area at

1310 South 3rd Street.

ISSUES

This is the first request for an Extension of Time for Special Use Permit (SUP-53471). The Urban Lounge use is permitted in the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district with the

approval of a Special Use Permit).

ANALYSIS

On May 13, 2014 the Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-53471) for a proposed Urban Lounge use at 1310 South 3rd Street. Per Condition #3 of the approved Special

Use Permit (SUP-53471) the entitlement was set to expire on May 13, 2016.

Title 19.16.110 of the Unified Development Code deems a Special Use Permit exercised uponthe issuance of a business license; as none have been issued the Special Use Permit is set to

expire. The applicant is requesting an Extension of Time to ensure the Special Use Permit does

not expire and has cited in the submitted justification letter that the project was delayed becausethe originally planned tenant decided not to occupy the tenant space. The applicant has indicated

that additional time is needed to find a new tenant for the proposed Urban Lounge. Staff supports

this request, as the Urban Lounge use can still actively contribute to the pedestrian interestsought after in the Downtown Centennial Plan.

FINDINGS (EOT-64112)

The Special Use Permit (SUP-53471) has not been exercised in accordance with the

requirements of Title 19.16, as a business license has not been issued for the Urban Lounge use.Staff is recommending approval of this Extension of Time request with a two-year time limit, as

the Urban Lounge use and proposed commercial development can still actively contribute to the

pedestrian interest sought after in the Downtown Centennial Plan.



EOT-64112

JB

Staff Report Page Two


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant Ci ty Actions by P&D, F ir e, Bldg., etc

01/18/95The City Council denied request for a Variance (V-0169-94) for aSecondhand Store at 1310 South 3

rd Street. The Planning Commission

recommended approval and staff recommended denial.

05/13/14

The Planning Commission approved a request for a Special Use Permit SUP-

53471) for a proposed 17,321 square-foot Urban Lounge use with 970 squarefeet of outside seating area at 1310 South 3rd Street. Staff recommended

approval of the request.

12/08/15

The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map (TMP-

61533) for a one-lot commercial subdivision on the west side of 3rd Street,

100 feet south of Colorado Avenue. Staff recommended approval of the

request. The Final Map has not yet recorded.

Most Recent Change of Ownershi p

06/25/14 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business L icenses

02/19/14

A business license (P62-00030) for an Urban Lounge (Tenaya Creek) at 1310South 3

rd Street was applied for. The license was withdrawn on 03/16/14.

A business license (G62-02319) for General Sales (Tenaya Creek) at 1310South 3rd

Street was applied for. The license was withdrawn on 03/16/14.

09/15/15A building permit (#284891) was issued on-sites with landscaping (HOP

Remodel) located at 1310 South 3rd

Street. The permit has not been finalized.

Pre-Application Meeting

A pre-application meeting is not required, nor was one held.

Neighborhood Meeting

A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.

F ield Check

05/05/16

During a routine site visit staff noted that the subject is currently under

construction and surrounded by chain link construction fencing. There was

graffiti located on the construction company’s sign located on the east

perimeter of the site.



EOT-64112

JB

Staff Report Page Three


Details of Appli cation Request

Site Area

Net Acres 0.48

Surrounding

Property

Ex isting Land Use

Per Ti tle 19.12

Planned or Special

Land Use DesignationExi sting Zoning Distri ct

Subject Property Vacant MXU (Mixed Use)C-2 (General

Commercial)

North General Retail MXU (Mixed Use)C-1 (Limited

Commercial)

SouthMulti-FamilyResidential

MXU (Mixed Use)C-2 (GeneralCommercial)

East Motel C (Commercial)C-2 (General

Commercial)

West

Laboratory, Medical

or DentalMXU (Mixed Use)

C-2 (General

Commercial)

UndevelopedR-4 (High Density

Residential)

Master Plan Areas Compliance

Downtown Centennial Plan Y

Special Pur pose and Over lay Di str icts Compli anceDowntown Centennial Plan Overlay District – Downtown South District Y

Live/Work Overlay District Y

Other Plans or Special Requi rements Compliance

Trails N/A

Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A

Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification Assessment) N/A

Project of Regional Significance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Street Name

Functional

Classif ication of

Street(s)

Govern ing Document

Actual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliance

with Street

Section

3rd

StreetSecondary

Collector

Master Plan of Streets

and Highways 80 Y



EOT-64112

JB

Staff Report Page Four


Parki ng Requi rement - Downtown

UseGross F loor

Area or Number

of Uni ts

Base Parki ng Requirement Provided Compliance

Parking Ratio Parking Parking

RegularHandi-

cappedRegular

Handi-

capped

Urban

Lounge

5,770 S F ofseating and

waiting area;

12,521 SF

remaining area

1 space per 50

SF of seating

and waitingarea

116

Plus 1 per 200

SF of

remaining

area

63

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 179 7 Y *

Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 173 6 6 1 Y *

*Projects located within the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan area are not subject to the

automatic application of parking requirements. However, the above table should be used to illustrate

the requirements of an analogous project in another location in the City.

















E O T - 6 4 1 1 2 - E X T E N S I O N O F T I M E - A P P L I C A N T / O W N E R : H O P , L L C

1 3 1 0 S O U T H 3 R D S T R E E T

0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6









Agenda Item No.: 8.





SUBJECT:TMP-64418 - TENTATIVE MAP - SUMMERLIN VILLAGE 26 - REVERENCE PHASE 2 -

APPLICANT/OWNER: PN II, INC. - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR

A 148-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 46.09 acres on the west sideof Clark County 215, approximately 1,200 feet north of Lake Mead Boulevard (portions of APNs

137-14-501-005 and 137-14-601-002), P-C (Planned Community) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony)







RECOMMENDATION:Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location and Aerial Maps

2. Conditions and Staff Report3. Supporting Documentation4. Photo(s)

5. Justification Letter

6. Approval Letter from the Howard Hughes Corporation







TMP-64418 [PRJ-64391]

SS




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: PN II, INC.


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

TMP-64418 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **


NOTICES MAILED N/A

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



TMP-64418 [PRJ-64391]

SS

Conditions Page One


** CONDITIONS **

TMP-64418 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of the Tentative Map shall be for no more than four (4) years. If a Final Map isnot recorded on all or a portion of the area embraced by the Tentative Map within four (4)

years of the approval of the Tentative Map, this action is void.

2. All development shall conform to the Summerlin Village 10, 11, 12 and 26 DevelopmentAgreement and the Summerlin Development Standards, 2004 Revision, as applicable.

3. Street names must be provided in accordance with the City’s Street Naming Regulations. Ifthe submitted Variance (VAR-64311) is denied, “Reverence Parkway” cannot be used on

any final map associated with this site.

4. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants and

water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of any

combustible structures.

5. All development is subject to the conditions of City Departments and State SubdivisionStatutes.

Public Works

6. The Final Map for Summerlin Village 26 – Reverence Phase 1 shall record prior torecordation of this Final Map to provide legal access.

7. Private streets must be granted and labeled on the Final Map for this site as Public Utility

Easements (P.U.E.), Public Sewer Easements, and Public Drainage Easements with private

maintenance by the Homeowner’s Association.

8. Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section of the Department of Fire Services to

discuss fire requirements for this Site Plan Prior to submittal of construction drawings forthis site.

9. Coordinate maintenance access to the manhole in Regenerate Lane between Lots 83 and 84with the Sanitary Sewer Connection Section of the Department of Public Works.



TMP-64418 [PRJ-64391]

SS

Conditions Page Two


10. All landscaping shall be situated and maintained so as to not create sight visibility

obstructions for vehicular traffic at all development access drives and abutting street

intersections.

11. Prior to the release of a Final Map for recordation on this site, the property owner must

contact the Special Improvement District Section of the Department of Public Works (702-229-2136) and sign a notarized affidavit acknowledging and agreeing to a per lot

assessment of all lots that will be created through a Final Map for this site. The City shall

prepare an apportionment report following recordation of the Final Map and this

apportionment report must be signed by the property owner prior to the release of any building permits for this site.

12. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by the

Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits,submittal of any construction drawings or the submittal of a Map subdividing this site,

whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the

approved drainage plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to constructsuch neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended by the

City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study

concurrent with development of this site.

13. Site development to comply with all applicable conditions of approval for Summerlin

Village 23B, SV-0018-01, Z-0119-96 and all other applicable site-related actions.

14. The approval of all Public Works related improvements shown on this Tentative Map is inconcept only. Specific design and construction details relating to size, type and/or

alignment of improvements, including but not limited to street, sewer and drainageimprovements, shall be resolved prior to approval of the construction plans by the City. No

deviations from adopted City Standards shall be allowed unless specific written approval

for such is received from the City Engineer prior to the recordation of a Final Map or the

approval of subdivision related construction plans, whichever may occur first. Approval ofthis Tentative Map does not constitute approval of any deviations. If such approval cannot

be obtained, a revised Tentative Map must be submitted showing elimination of such

deviations.





TMP-64418 [PRJ-64391]

SS



This is the second phase of the Reverence (Summerlin Village 26) development. The Phase 1

tentative map included the entire site, but only depicted single-family lots on parcels alreadyowned by the applicant, leaving the remaining parcels to include common area or large pod lots

for future development. The applicant has now acquired the entire area. Lots on this proposed

Phase 2 map are not contiguous; they would remap portions of Phase 1. Before a final map can be accepted for Phase 2, the matching portions of Phase 1 must record. At this time, a final map

covering all or part of Phase 1 has not been submitted. A condition of approval addresses this

issue.

Access to this phase would be from Lake Mead Boulevard and from portions of Phase 1, namely

the proposed Desert Hope Drive, Reverence Parkway (both public streets) and Oceanic Bliss

Drive (private). Residential streets are primarily 41-foot private streets, with gated entries up to

60 feet to accommodate turnaround traffic. Reverence Parkway, the major collector road for thecommunity, reaches 81 feet in width. Lot sizes range from 4,275 square feet to 18,641 square

feet.

There are two north-south cross sections submitted and both depict a maximum natural grade

greater than 2% across this site. Per the Summerlin Development Standards, all development is

allowed a maximum exposure of 10 feet. No retaining walls are shown.

The submitted east-west cross sections depict a maximum natural grade less than 2% across this

site. Per the Summerlin Development Standards, all development is allowed a maximum

exposure of 10 feet. There are no retaining walls shown.

The Clark County School District projects that approximately 64 additional primary and

secondary school students will be generated by the proposed development on this site. All threelevels of schools serving the area (Lummis Elementary School, Becker Middle School and Palo

Verde High School) are near or over capacity for the 2015-2016 school year. In particular, Palo

Verde High School is at 101 percent of program capacity.

FINDINGS (TMP-64418)

The map as proposed is in conformance with Title 19 and NRS requirements for tentative maps.

Staff recommends approval with the understanding that Phase 2 will tie together streets thatdead-end at the phase lines. The development is in conformance with requirements of the

Village 10, 11, 12 and 26 Development Agreement, Summerlin Development Standards and any private requirements from the Master Developer. Before acceptance of a final map for Phase 2, a

Final Map for the areas of Phase 1 that correspond to the subdivision boundaries in Phase 2 must

be recorded.



TMP-64418 [PRJ-64391]

SS




Related Relevant Ci ty Actions by P&D, F ir e, Bldg., etc.

02/16/94

The City Council approved a Development Agreement (DA-0002-93)

between The Howard Hughes Corporation and the City of Las Vegas for

Summerlin Villages 10, 11, 12 and 26 on 2695 acres (166 acres of which were

already within city boundaries). The Development Agreement becameeffective 03/15/94.

The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0135-93) from N-U (Non-Urban)

to P-C (Planned Community) of 2,528.70 acres located west of Hualapai Way

between Cheyenne Avenue and Charleston Boulevard. The PlanningCommission and staff recommended approval.

02/14/96A four-lot Parcel Map (PM-0041-95) on a portion of the annexation area(2082.89 acres) located west of Hualapai Way between Cheyenne Avenue

and Charleston Boulevard was recorded as Parcel Map File 84 Page 70.

09/15/04The City Council approved a revised Summerlin Development Standardsdocument (DIR-3934), which is still in effect.

11/18/15

The City Council approved a Summerlin Major Modification (MOD-61039)of an approved Development Plan for Village 26 on 300.16 acres at the

northwest corner of Lake Mead Boulevard and Clark County 215. The

Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.

The City Council approved a Tentative Map (TMP-60968) for a master planned village (Summerlin Village 26 – Reverence Phase 1) containing 323

single-family residential lots, one multi-family residential lot and 14 large podlots on 300.16 acres at the northwest corner of Lake mead Boulevard andClark County 215. The Planning Commission and staff recommended

approval. The approval expires 10/13/19.

12/29/15A Parcel Map (PMP-61340) for four parcels at the northwest corner of Lake

Mead Boulevard and Clark County 215 was recorded.

06/14/16

The Planning Commission will consider a request for a Variance (VAR-

64311) to allow the street name “Reverence” to coexist with the existingstreet name “Reference” where sound-alike names cannot be used on 285.06

acres at the northwest corner of Clark County 215 and Lake Mead Boulevard.


03/17/16 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership on APN 137-14-501-005.

12/01/06 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership on APN 137-14-601-002.



TMP-64418 [PRJ-64391]

SS




04/26/07

An early grading permit (21523) was issued for mass grading of the Village

26 site in conjunction with submitted civil plans (19506) [Reference Drawing Number 107Y4950-RM].

08/23/07A stockpile permit (L-CIVIL-23791) was issued for movement of 1.5 acres ofdirt at the southwest corner of Cheyenne Avenue and Clark County 215.

Final approval was granted 08/22/07.

04/18/13

A Civil Improvement Plan permit (L-CIVIL-48293) was issued for an interim

berm at the southwest corner of Lake Mead Boulevard and Clark County 215.

Final approval was granted 09/17/15.

04/20/16Application was made for Civil Improvement Permit (L-CIVIL-64315) on300.16 acres at the northwest corner of Lake Mead Boulevard and Clark

County 215. A permit has not been issued.


04/25/16A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss submittal

requirements for a Tentative Map. There were no major concerns.


A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

F ield Check

05/05/16

The site is undeveloped and partially graded with an access road running

parallel to Clark County 215 and an improved drainage channel. The terrain

is steep and varied in places and contains a low area for stormwater retention.


Site Area

Net Acres 46.09

Lot Analysis

Phase 1(approved)

323

Phase 2(proposed)

148

Remaining

allowed lots2,314



TMP-64418 [PRJ-64391]

SS

Staff Report Page Five


Surrounding

Property

Ex isting Land Use

Per Ti tle 19.12

Planned or Special

Land Use Designation Exi sting Zoning Distri ctSubject Property Undeveloped Summerlin P-C (Planned Community)

North Undeveloped

PF (Schools, Churches,Public Facilities) –

Clark County

Designation

R-U (Rural Open Land) –

Clark County Designation

South Undeveloped Summerlin P-C (Planned Community)

East East Clark County 215 ROW (Right-of-Way)

West Undeveloped Summerlin P-C (Planned Community)


Summerlin Y

Special Pur pose and Over lay Di str icts Compli ance

P-C (Planned Community) District Y


Trails (Private) Y





Development of the site encompassed by the proposed tentative map will be according to theVillage 26 Development Plan, Summerlin Development Standards and private agreements

between the owner and developers.

Open Space – Summerl in Vil lage 26

Total

Acreage

Units Requi red Provided Compli ance

Ratio Percent Ar ea Percent Area

300.16 acres 2,785 330 SF per unit

N/A 21.1 ac 21.6% 64.9 ac Y

This number reflects the maximum number of units in the village. It does not include

undevelopable, mountainous areas or detention basins.





ｘㄦ゜ｘธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡɱ

TMP-64418





Ｃ ǲ Ћ ǲ Ձ Ḷ О ǲ Ő

ǲ Ќ Ḛ ● Ќ ǲ ǲ Ő

Ⓢ ╗ ● Ձ ● ╗ Ɔ ǲ Ő Ћ ● ǲ Ɔ

Ḷ Û Ќ ǲ Ő

Ќ Ḷ ╗

╗ Ḷ

Ɔ A Ձ ǲ

Ձ ǲ Ḛ

ǲ Ќ Ｃ

Ҝ О

A Ա Ա Ő ǲ Ћ ● A ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

A Ա Ա Ő ǲ Ћ ● A ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

Ձ ǲ Ḛ A Ձ Ｃ ǲ

Ɔ Ő ● О ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

Ɔ ● ╗ ǲ Ｃ A ╗ A

Ќ Ḷ ╗ ╗ Ḷ

Ɔ A Ձ ǲ

╗

╗

╗ О ● A Ձ Ɔ ǲ ╗ Ա A

A Ձ Ɔ

A

ｘㄦ゜ ฎ ゜ ″

О Ő İ ″ ㅡ ɱ

T M P - 6 4

4 1 8 - R E V I S E D



Ҝ

A ╗ Ġ Ձ ● Ќ ǲ

Ɔ ǲ ǲ

Ɔ Ġ ǲ ǲ ╗

╗ Ҝ

╗

╗

Ќ Ḷ ╗ ╗ Ḷ

Ɔ A Ձ ǲ

ｘㄦ゜ｘ ธ ゜ ″

О Ő İ ″ ㅡ ɱ

T

M P 6 4 4 1 8



╗

╗

Ҝ A ╗ Ġ Ձ ● Ќ ǲ

Ɔ ǲ ǲ

Ɔ Ġ ǲ ǲ ╗

╗ Ҝ ㅡ

Ҝ A ╗ Ġ Ձ ● Ќ ǲ

Ɔ ǲ ǲ

Ɔ Ġ ǲ ǲ ╗

╗ Ҝ ธ

Ќ Ḷ ╗ ╗ Ḷ

Ɔ A Ձ ǲ


О Ő İ ″ ㅡ ɱ

T M

P 6 4 4 1 8



Ҝ A ╗ Ġ Ձ ● Ќ ǲ Ɔ ǲ ǲ Ɔ Ġ ǲ ǲ ╗ ╗ Ҝ

╗

╗

Ќ Ḷ ╗ ╗ Ḷ

Ɔ A Ձ ǲ

Ҝ A ╗ Ġ


О Ő İ ″ ㅡ ɱ

T M P - 6 4 4 1 8



A

ӧ

Ա

ㅡ

ฎ

ӧ

Ｃ

ㄦ

ǲ

╗

╗

╗

╗

Ġ

╗

Ḛ

╗


О Ő İ ″ ㅡ ɱ

T M

P 6 4 4 1 8







╗

╗


О Ő İ ″ ㅡ ɱ

T

M P 6 4 4 1 8



T M P - 6 4 4 1 8 [ P R J - 6 4 3

9 1 ] - T E N T A T I V E M A P - A P P L I C

A N T / O W N E R : P N I I , I N C .

W E S T S I D E O F C L A R

K C O U N T Y 2 1 5 , A P P R O X I M A T E L

Y 1 , 2 0 0 F E E T N O R T H O F L A K E M E A D B O U L E V A R D

0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6



T M P - 6 4 4 1 8 [ P R J - 6 4 3

9 1 ] - T E N T A T I V E M A P - A P P L I C

A N T / O W N E R : P N I I , I N C .

W E S T S I D E O F C L A R

K C O U N T Y 2 1 5 , A P P R O X I M A T E L

Y 1 , 2 0 0 F E E T N O R T H O F L A K E M E A D B O U L E V A R D

0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6



╗γ ĠਙʉŴผ₡ Ġ γ ਙผऑਙผŴשħਙ Ɔここ ผкħ ｘฎｘ Û㈠ γŴผк שਙ Աਙк ٹŴผ₡ⓒ Ɔħש ｘｘ

ՁŴ Ћ فŴⓒ Ќ ٹŴ₡Ŵ ฎɱ ㄦ

╗ ՙｘธ㈠ՙɱ ㈠ㅡｘｘｘ

Aऑผħк ธ″ⓒ ธｘ

″

Ợħ㌱

ǲ₡ʉŴผ₡Ｃħผ

㌱ש

ਙผ

ਙ⑾

ՁŴ₡

Ｃٹ

кਙऑこ

ש

Окש

Ġਙこ

ฎㅡㄦ

Û㈠

Ɔש

ŐਙŴ₡

ՁŴ Ћف

Ŵⓒ ЌЋ ฎɱ

Őǲ ƆＣŐ ╗ Ŵ ħٹ ҜŴऑ ОγŴ ธ ਙ₡ħ ħਙŴк AऑऑผਙٹŴк Окש Ġਙこ

ⓒ

ОγŴ

ⓒ

Ɔここ

ผкħ

ЋħккŴف

ธ″ ӧŐٹ

ผ

㌱

ỏ

Ｃ

Ŵผ Ợħ㌱

╗γ

Ɔここ

ผкħ Ｃ

ħف

Őٹ

ħ

ʉ ਙここħשש

ӧƆＣŐỏ γŴ ผٹ

ħ

ʉ

₡ Ŵ₡ Ŵऑऑผਙٹ

₡ ਙผ ╗

ש

Ŵש

ħٹ

ҜŴऑ ⑾ਙผ

Őٹ

ผ

㌱

ⓒ

ОγŴ

ธ㈠

●ש

γŴ

⇡

Ŵऑऑผਙٹ

₡

ʉħש

γ

ש

γ

㌱ਙ₡ħש

ħਙ

ש

γŴש

Окש

㌱ਙש

ħ

ש

ਙ

ʉਙผ

ʉħש

γ

ĠਙʉŴผ₡

Ġف

γ

ש

γผਙف

γש

γ

₡ٹ

кਙऑこ

ש

ऑผਙ㌱

㈠

Ок

Ŵ

㌱ਙש

Ŵ㌱ ש

ħ⑾

ਙ

γŴٹ

Ŵ׀

ש

ħਙ㈠

Ɔħ㌱

ผ

кⓒ

Ա ש ਙผħٹ Ɔγש

Ɔ

ħਙผ

Ｃ

ħف

ҜŴŴف

ผ

ƆЌＣŐ

ｘㄦ゜ｘธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡɱ

TMP-64418











TMP-64433 [PRJ-64085]

JB

Conditions Page One


** CONDITIONS **


Planning

1. Approval of the Tentative Map shall be for no more than four (4) years. If a Final Map is

not recorded on all or a portion of the area embraced by the Tentative Map within four (4)years of the approval of the Tentative Map, this action is void.

2. A note shall be added to the final map to provide irrevocable, perpetual common access

and parking to all driveways, drive aisles and parking spaces for all sites located within the boundaries of the commercial subdivision.


water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of anycombustible structures.

4. The Final Map shall contain a note granting perpetual common access and parking acrossthe entire subdivision.

5. All development is subject to the conditions of City Departments and State Subdivision

Statutes.

Publi c Works

6. The onsite sewer shall be private and per Title 19.16.060.W. 2, sewer service for this

commercial subdivision shall be shown in accordance with one of the following three

alternatives, and the appropriate note shall appear on the face of the recorded Final Map:a. Onsite sewers, 8-inches in diameter or larger, are public sewers where located within

20 foot wide dedicated public sewer easements.

b. Onsite sewers are a common element privately owned and maintained per the

Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) of this commercial subdivision.c. Onsite sewers are a common element privately owned and maintained per the Joint

Use Agreement of this commercial subdivision.

7. Per Title 19.16.060.W.1, provide a note on the Final Map that states “All parcels createdthrough this map shall have perpetual unobstructed access to all driveways servicing the

overall subdivision unless incompatible uses can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the

City Engineer.”



TMP-64433 [PRJ-64085]

JB

Conditions Page Two


8. Per Title 19.16.060.W.3, provide a note on the Final Map that states “All subdivided lots

within this Final Map shall provide perpetual inter-lot drainage rights across all existing

and future parcel limits.”

9. Site development to comply with all applicable conditions of approval for SDR-10071 and

all other applicable site-related actions.

10. The approval of all Public Works related improvements shown on this Tentative Map is in

concept only. Specific design and construction details relating to size, type and/or


additional deviations from adopted City Standards shall be allowed unless specific written

approval for such is received from the City Engineer prior to the recordation of a Final Map

or the approval of subdivision related construction plans, whichever may occur first.Approval of this Tentative Map does not constitute approval of any deviations. If such

approval cannot be obtained, a revised Tentative Map must be submitted showing

elimination of such deviations.



TMP-64433 [PRJ-64085]

JB



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant requests approval of a Tentative Map for a one-lot commercial subdivision on 1.93acres at the southwest corner of Ackerman Avenue and Durango Drive.

ISSUES

The subject site is developed; there are no proposed changes or additions to the site.

The applicant has stated within the submitted justification letter that it intends to create a

one-lot commercial subdivision so that a record of survey can be done at a later date to createa separate ownership parcel for the building pad on the southern perimeter of the site.

ANALYSIS

There is an existing 13,722 square-foot commercial development constructed in 2008 on the

subject site. All existing structures on the site meet the Title 19 requirements for the C-1(Limited Commercial) zoning district.

Access to the site is provided from one driveway off of Durango Drive. As the site is developed,

all grading and drainage has already taken place and will not be an issue. Site circulation islogical throughout the site and will be unaffected by mapping. Parking and access is intended to

be allowed across the site. A condition of approval will require that common perpetual access

and parking will be granted across the entire proposed commercial subdivision.

Staff notes that north/south and east/west cross sections are not shown with this Tentative Map

submittal. However, since this property and all surrounding property is developed or graded, noretaining walls are shown or anticipated as no changes are proposed.

The map meets and complies with the Title 19 and NRS 278 requirements for a Tentative Map;

therefore, staff recommends approval with conditions. If denied, the existing parcel would

remain.


All Title 19 zoning and NRS 278 and technical requirements regarding tentative maps are

satisfied. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the subject tentative map with conditions.



TMP-64433 [PRJ-64085]

JB





02/05/03

The City Council approved a request for Annexation (A-0038-02) to annexundeveloped property located in various parts of the city under the provisions

of NRS 268.597 No. 1(b), containing approximately 495 acres. The Planning

Commission recommended approval of the request.

01/24/06A code enforcement case (#37811) was processed for a large dump truckrepeatedly parking on the vacant lot.

04/05/06

The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-10071)for a proposed 13,722 square-foot commercial development on 2.12 acres at

the southwest corner of Ackerman Avenue and Durango Drive. The Planning

Commission recommended approval of the request.

05/10/07

The Planning Commission denied a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-20814) for a proposed Auto Title Loan with a Waiver to allow no distance

separation from a residential property where 200 feet is required and a Waiver

to allow a 1,288 square-foot establishment where 1,500 is the minimumsquare footage required on property located on the southwest corner of

Durango Drive and Ackerman Avenue.

10/07/09

The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-35224)

for an Accessory Package Liquor Off-Sale use within an existing 2,150

square-foot General Retail Store, Other than Listed (Convenience Store) at8053 North Durango Drive, Suite #160. The Planning Commission and staff

recommended approval.

12/02/09

The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-36130)for a 1,355 square-foot Secondhand Dealer (Wearing Apparel) at 8053 NorthDurango Drive, Suite #130. The Planning Commission and staff





04/03/08

A building permit (#105096) was issued for a restaurant shell building (TacoBell) located at 8033 North Durango Drive. The permit was finalized on

04/13/09.

A building permit (#105098) was issued for onsite hardscape (Taco Bell)

located at 8033 North Durango Drive. The permit has not been finalized.



TMP-64433 [PRJ-64085]

JB



Related Bui lding Permits/Business L icenses

04/02/09

A building permit (#7003137) was issued for a retail shell building (Durango

Grand Teton Commercial Center) located at 8043 North Durango Drive. The permit was finalized on 09/10/09.

12/30/14A building permit (#7002791) was issued for a retail shell building (DurangoGrand Teton Commercial Center) located at 8053 North Durango Drive. The

permit was finalized on 12/30/14.


04/05/16A pre-application conference was held with the applicant to discuss the

Tentative Map submittal requirements for a one-lot commercial subdivision.


A neighborhood meeting was not held, nor was one required.

F ield Check

05/05/16Staff conducted a routine field check and found the subject site to be a well

maintained commercial development.

Details of Appli cation RequestSite Area

Net Acres 1.93

Surrounding

Property

Ex isting Land Use

Per Ti tle 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject Property

Office, Other than

ListedPCD (Planned

Community

Development)

C-1 (LimitedCommercial)General Retail

Stores

NorthSingle Family,

Detached

PCD (PlannedCommunity

Development)

R-PD6 (ResidentialPlanned Development – 6

Units per Acre)

SouthCommercialDevelopment

PCD (Planned

CommunityDevelopment)

C-1 (LimitedCommercial)



TMP-64433 [PRJ-64085]

JB



Surrounding

Property

Ex isting Land Use

Per Ti tle 19.12

Planned or Special


EastSingle Family,

Detached

PCD (PlannedCommunity

Development)


Units per Acre)

WestSingle Family,

Detached

PCD (Planned

Community

Development)

R-PD7 (Residential

Planned Development – 7

Units per Acre)


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A


No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A


Trails Y





Street NameFunctional

Classif ication of

Street(s)

Govern ing DocumentActual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliancewith Street

Section

Durango Drive Primary ArterialMaster Plan of Streets

and Highways100 Y



ｘㅡ゜ธՙ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡｘฎㄦ

TMP-64433





ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ՙ ゜ ″

О Ő İ ″ ㅡ ｘ ฎ ㄦ

T M P 6 4 4 3 3



ｘㅡ゜ธՙ゜

″


TMP-64433



ｘㅡ゜ธՙ゜

″


TMP-64433



T M P - 6 4 4 3 3 [ P R J - 6 4 0

8 5 ] - T E N T A T I V E M A P - A P P L

I C A N T : F I R S T

S T R E E T

D E V E L O

P M E N T

- O W N E R :

S S B P R O P C O , L L C

S O U T H W E S T C O R N E R O F A C K E R M A N A V E N U E A N D D

U R A N G O D R I V E

0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6



T M P - 6 4 4 3 3 [ P R J - 6 4 0



S T R E E T

D E V E L O

P M E N T

- O W N E R :




0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6



T M P - 6 4 4 3 3 [ P R J - 6 4 0



S T R E E T

D E V E L O

P M E N T

- O W N E R :




0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6



ҜǲҜḶ ｘ

Оผਙ㈾㌱ ЌŴこＣผŴ ਙ゜ḚผŴ₡ ╗ שਙ Ɔγਙऑऑħ ש ผ Оผਙ㈾㌱ｘ㈠ｘｘں″ｘںＣŴ ںں ҜŴں ″ ╗ħこ ㅡธ ОҜں Ա İĠ

ОŴف ں⑾ ਙں

╗ऑ ਙ⑾ ผ ㌱ ╗ к ㌱ਙ⑾ ผ ㌱ Ő Ŵผ㌱γŐ ऑਙผ ש Ḷשγ ผ ﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝

Ｃħשผħ⇡שħਙ Ɔ ⑾⑾Ŵש

ＣŴ ש ●ħ ħŴкש

Ɔħ ₡ ⇡

﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝ ﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝ ﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝ ﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝ ﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝ ﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝ ﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝ ЌŴこ ккħ ĠŴкऑħ﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝ ﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝ ﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝ ╗ħשк A ㌱ Оผਙ㌱ ਙผ

﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝ ﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝ ﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝ ՁŴש ऑผħש ₡ ㄦ゜ ″ں゜ธｘںں ㅡธｘｘ ОҜں

ҜŴħк Ок Ŵ ผ ऑк Ő ٹħ ʉ ₡ Ա ﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝

ĠŴ₡ Ｃ кħٹ ผ ₡ Ќਙ Ő ऑк Ќ ㌱ Ŵผ Оผਙ㈾㌱ש ħк Ġ㈠Ő㈠Ҝ㈠ ħк

Ŵゥ ₡ Ⓢк ǲゥ㌱ ऑשħਙ ╗Ŵ A㌱㌱ਙש ħк Ḷשγ ผ ﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝

⇓ธｘ ⇓ｘㅡɱש″ Оผਙ㈾㌱ں ธں⇓γ ＣผŴ ਙש ｘ㈠ｘｘ ╗AḶ ԱǲՁՁ ㌀ ฎｘㅡธ Ќਙผں″ｘں ОγŴ ″⇓Ҝ こਙ ｘں ผ ٹں㈠₡ਙ㌱ゥ

ਙऑผħ γש ⊕ ธｘｘں ОƆҜⓒ ●㌱㈠

AОЌ ธㄦ

ｘฎ

ฎｘ″

ｘｘ

Ő׀ ש ╗γ ผ ׀ ש ħ ⑾ਙผ Ŵ ╗ שŴשħٹ ҜŴऑ ⑾ਙผ Ŵ Ḷ

Ձਙש ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк Ɔ⇡₡ħٹħħਙ ⑾ਙผ AОЌ ธㄦｘฎں ฎｘ″ ｘｘ

Оผਙ㈾㌱ש

ЌŴこＣผŴ ਙ゜ḚผŴ₡ ╗ שਙ Ɔγਙऑऑħ ש ผ ╗ שŴשħٹ ҜŴऑ

Оผਙ㈾㌱ש Ｃ㌱ผħऑשħਙ ╗γ ⇡㈾㌱ש ऑผਙऑ ผ שⓒ AОЌ ธㄦں ｘฎ ฎｘ″ ｘｘⓒ ħ ŴऑऑผਙゥħこŴש к ₡㈠ɱ Ŵ㌱ผ Ŵںкਙ㌱Ŵש ₡ Ŵש שγ Ќਙผ שγ Û ש ㌱ਙผ ผ ਙ⑾ Ќ ＣผŴ ਙ Ｃผħٹ Ŵ₡ ḚผŴ₡ ╗ שਙ Ｃผħٹ ㈠ ╗γ ħש ħ Ŵ ⑾Ŵש ⑾ਙਙ₡ผ שŴผŴש Ŵ₡ ਙʉ ₡ ⇡ ƆƆԱ Оผਙऑ㌱ਙⓒ ՁՁ㈠ ╗γ ╗Ŵ㌱ਙ Ա кк Ő שŴผŴש ħ кਙ㌱Ŵש ₡ Ŵש שγ ਙשγ ₡ਙ⑾ γש ऑŴผ㌱ к㈠

╗γ ⇡㈾㌱ש ऑŴผ㌱ к γŴ Ŵкผ Ŵ₡ ⇡ ㌱ਙこऑк ש к ㌱ਙשผ㌱ש ₡ⓒ ʉħשγ ਙ ⑾שผ ⇡ħк₡ħ ऑкŴ ₡㈠ ╗γ ऑผऑਙ ਙ⑾ ਙ Ŵккਙʉ Ŵ ਙש ħשγħ ऑผਙ㈾㌱ש

кਙש ㌱ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк ⇡₡ħٹħħਙ こŴऑⓒ ਙ γש ╗Ŵ㌱ਙ Ա кк ㌱Ŵ ⇡ ऑŴผŴש ₡ ⑾ผਙこ γש ਙשγ ผ ゥħשħ ⇡ħк₡ħ ਙ γħ ऑŴผ㌱ кש ٹ ħŴ Ő ㌱ਙผ₡ ਙ⑾ Ɔผٹ ㈠ Aкк ⇡ħк₡ħ ਙ γħשħש Ŵผ Ŵкผ Ŵ₡ ⇡ħкשⓒ ʉħשγ ਙ ⑾ผ שγ ผ ㌱γŴ ਙผ ㌱ਙשผ㌱שħਙ ऑкŴ ₡㈠ Aкк ⇡ħ ਙ שγħ ħשʉħкк こŴħשŴħ שŴש שγ ħผ ㌱ผผ ש ਙ⑾ ⇡ħ ⓒ ʉħשγ ਙ ऑผਙऑਙ ₡ ㌱γŴ ㈠ ਙผ γש ħש ऑкŴⓒ ʉ γŴٹŴששŴ㌱γ ₡ γש γਙผħ▷ਙשŴк ㌱ਙשผਙк γ γש ⑾ผਙこש Ŵऑऑผਙٹ ₡ ㌱ħٹħк שⓒ Ŵ ʉ кк Ŵ Ŵ Ŵผ Ŵ こŴऑ γħ γкħ γשħ γש ऑŴผ㌱ к㈠ A ゥγħ⇡ħש ₡ ħ γש ผ ⑾ ผ ㌱ ₡ ₡ผŴʉħ ⓒ Ŵкк ħこऑผਙٹ こ ש Ŵ₡ ਙ⑾⑾ ħש Ŵผ ħ ऑкŴ㌱㈠

╗γ ऑผਙ㈾㌱ש Ŵש שγħ ħこש ħ ਙש ผ ׀ שħ Ŵ ▷ਙ ㌱γŴ ⓒ ਙผ ħ⇡кשŴผħŴ㌱ Ŵ₡ ħ ㌱ਙこऑŴٹ ʉħשγŴ₡㈾Ŵ㌱ ש ₡ ٹ кਙऑこ ש㈠ ╗γ ऑผਙऑਙ ₡ ʉਙผ ħ Ŵкਙ ㌱ਙħש ש ʉħשγ γש Ḛ ผŴк ऑкŴⓒ ՁЋ שŴ₡Ŵผ₡Ŵ₡ ╗ħשк ɱ㈠ں

ｘㄦ゜ں

ธ゜ں

″


TMP-64433 - REVISED



Agenda Item No.: 10.





SUBJECT:TMP-64465 - TENTATIVE MAP - SANTA ROSA TOWNHOMES - SUMMERLIN VILLAGE

23B PARCEL AA - APPLICANT: RYLAND HOMES NEVADA, LLC - OWNER: THE

HOWARD HUGHES COMPANY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative MapFOR A 202-LOT SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 18.56

acres at the southeast corner of Fox Hills Drive and Far Hills Avenue (APN 137-27-717-001), P-

C (Planned Community) Zone [MF2 (Medium Density Multi-Family) Summerlin Special Land

Use Designation], Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-64262]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.






RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:

1. Location and Aerial Maps2. Conditions and Staff Report3. Supporting Documentation

4. Photo(s)

5. Justification Letter6. Approval Letter from the Howard Hughes Corporation







TMP-64465 [PRJ-64262]

JB




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: RYLAND HOMES NEVADA, LLC - OWNER:

THE HOWARD HUGHES COMPANY, LLC


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

TMP-64465 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **


NOTICES MAILED N/A

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



TMP-64465 [PRJ-64262]

JB

Conditions Page One


** CONDITIONS **


Planning


not recorded on all or a portion of the area embraced by the Tentative Map with four (4)


2. All development shall conform to the Conditions of Approval of Rezoning (Z-0119-96),

the Summerlin West Development Agreement and the Summerlin Development Standards.

3. Street names must be provided in accordance with the City of Las Vegas Street Naming

and Address Assignment Regulations, 2009 Edition.




5. In conjunction with creation, declaration and recordation of the subject common-interestcommunity, and prior to recordation of the Covenants, Codes and Restrictions (“CC&R”),

or conveyance of any unit within the community, the Developer is required to record aDeclaration of Private Maintenance Requirements (“DPMR”) as a covenant on all

associated properties, and on behalf of all current and future property owners. The DPMR

is to include a listing of all privately owned and/or maintained infrastructure improvements,along with assignment of maintenance responsibility for each to the common interest

community or the respective individual property owners, and is to provide a brief

description of the required level of maintenance for privately maintained components. The

DPMR must be reviewed and approved by the City of Las Vegas Department of FieldOperations prior to recordation, and must include a statement that all properties within the

community are subject to assessment for all associated costs should private maintenanceobligations not be met, and the City of Las Vegas be required to provide for said

maintenance. Also, the CC&R are to include a statement of obligation of compliance withthe DPMR. Following recordation, the Developer is to submit copies of the recorded

DPMR and CC&R documents to the City of Las Vegas Department of Field Operations.


Statutes.



TMP-64465 [PRJ-64262]

JB

Conditions Page Two


Publi c Works

7. Private streets must be granted and labeled on the Final Map for this site as Public UtilityEasements (P.U.E.), Public Sewer Easements, and Public Drainage Easements with private

maintenance by the Homeowner’s Association.

8. Appropriate public easements (Sewer, Drainage, Emergency Access, etc.) over the adjacent

Common Lots 4 and 5 of the Amended Summerlin Village 23B Unit No. 3 Final Map

(Book 147 Page 12), over the adjacent Common Open Space COS-3 of the Summerlin

Village 23B Unit 3 Final Map (Book 145 Page 95) and Common lot 26 of the SummerlinVillage 23B Unit No. 2 Final Map (Book 145 Page 83) shall be granted to the City of Las

Vegas by separate document as determined by the Department of Public Works prior to the

recordation of a Final Map for this site requiring these easements. These easements are

outside the boundary of this Tentative Map and are to be privately maintained.

9. Remove all references to the Clark County Water Reclamation District.

10. Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section of the Department of Fire Services to

discuss fire requirements for this Site Plan Prior to submittal of construction drawings for

this site.

11. All landscaping shall be situated and maintained so as to not create sight visibility

obstructions for vehicular traffic at all development access drives and abutting street

intersections.

12. Prior to the release of a Final Map for recordation on this site, the property owner must

contact the Special Improvement District Section of the Department of Public Works (702-229-2136) and sign a notarized affidavit acknowledging and agreeing to a per lot

assessment of all lots that will be created through a Final Map for this site. The City shall

prepare an apportionment report following recordation of the Final Map and this

apportionment report must be signed by the property owner prior to the release of any building permits for this site.


Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits,

submittal of any construction drawings or the submittal of a Map subdividing this site,whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the

approved drainage plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to constructsuch neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended by the

City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study


14. Site development to comply with all applicable conditions of approval for Summerlin

Village 23B, SV-0018-01, Z-0119-96 and all other applicable site-related actions.



TMP-64465 [PRJ-64262]

JB

Conditions Page Three






for such is received from the City Engineer prior to the recordation of a Final Map or theapproval of subdivision-related construction plans, whichever may occur first. Approval of

this Tentative Map does not constitute approval of any deviations. If such approval cannot


deviations.



TMP-64465 [PRJ-64262]

JB



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is proposing a 202-lot single-family attached townhome subdivision on a 18.56-

acre undeveloped site on the southeast corner of Fox Hill Avenue and Far Hills Avenue, located

within Village 23B of Summerlin West. The map has been reviewed and approved by the

Summerlin Design Review Committee and conforms to the Summerlin Development Standards,applicable NRS statutes and Title 19 requirements; therefore, staff recommends approval with

conditions. If denied, a final map subdividing the subject property cannot be accepted or

approved.

ISSUES

Access to the subdivision will be from Antelope Ridge Drive.

ANALYSIS

The subject property is part of Summerlin West, which is governed by a Development

Agreement between the Master Developer and the City of Las Vegas, as well as the Summerlin

Development Standards. The proposed tentative map was reviewed and conditionally approved by the Summerlin Design Review Committee on 04/27/16, prior to submittal to the City for

review.

The Summerlin Development Land Use Plan designates the subject property as MF2 (Medium

Density Multi-Family), which allows up to 21 residential units per gross acre. The proposed

density of 10.88 dwelling units per net acre falls well within the maximum allowed. As this siteis part of a master plan with its own improvement standards, it is not subject to Title 19.04 street

section requirements. Although it is not subject to Title 19 connectivity requirements, the design

of the subdivision has a Connectivity Score of 0.76, which is below the preferred ratio of 1.30.

The proposed homes range in size from 1,400 square feet to 2,200 square feet. Site access is proposed from Antelope Ridge Drive by way of a 44-foot public street that will serve this site.

Interior circulation is provided by 39-foot, 35-foot and 25-foot wide private streets with L-curbsand roll-curbs on-site. No required trails are adjacent to the site. No neighborhood parks are

proposed.



TMP-64465 [PRJ-64262]

JB



The submitted east/west cross section depicts maximum natural grade greater than 2% across this

site. Per the Summerlin Development Standards, all development is allowed a maximum

exposure of 10 feet. Although not labeled, there appears to be one retaining wall along thenorthern boundary approximately three feet in height.

The submitted north/south cross sections depict maximum natural grade less than 2% across thissite. Per the Summerlin Development Standards, all development is allowed a maximum

exposure of 10 feet. There are two retaining walls shown at the western boundary, one is 2.5 feet

in height and the other one is four feet in height. There is a four-foot retaining wall along the

eastern boundary and an internal retaining wall 6.7 feet in height. The walls are designed inaccordance with Summerlin Village 23B requirements (enforced by Summerlin), with mortar

washed slump stone fascia and decorative capped stucco exterior pilasters.

The Clark County School District projects that approximately 87 primary and secondary schoolstudents would be generated by the proposed development on this site. Of the three schools

serving the area (Givens Elementary School, Sig Rogich Middle School and Palo Verde High

School), the District notes that all three schools are over capacity for the 2015-16 school year,and no new schools are planned in this area at this time.


The proposed Tentative Map conforms to Nevada Revised Statutes, Title 19 and the Summerlin

Development Standards, and has been approved by the Summerlin Design Review Committee.

Therefore, staff recommends approval with conditions.



12/11/02

The City Referral Group approved a request for a Summerlin Site

Development Plan Review (CRG-1302) for an Aggregate and Asphalt Planton property located west of the intersection of Summerlin Parkway and I-215.

04/30/03The City Referral Group approved a request for a Summerlin SiteDevelopment Plan Review (CRG-2243) for Community, Village and

Neighborhood Entry Monumentation located in Villages 23A and 23B.

12/04/03

The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map (TMP-3280) for a 11-lot residential development on 439 acres located at the

northwest corner of Alta Drive and Desert Foothills Drive. Staff

recommended approval of the request.



TMP-64465 [PRJ-64262]

JB




03/25/04

The Department of Planning approved a request for a Extension of Time

(EOT-3886) for an approved Tentative Map of Summerlin Village 23A (TM-0006-02) for 20 lots on 389.4 acres adjacent to the northwest corner ofCharleston Boulevard and Desert Foothills Drive.

05/05/04

The City Council approved a request for Master Development Plan Review

(MDR-3867) for a Summerlin Development Plan Review for Summerlin

Village 24 on 502.2 acres adjacent to the west side of Sky Vista Drive, between Alta Drive and Charleston Boulevard. Staff recommended approval

of the request.

05/13/04


4175) for a 20-lot Mixed-Use Subdivision on 502.2 acres adjacent to the west

side of Sky Vista Drive, between Alta Drive and Charleston Boulevard. Staff


06/10/04


4365) for a 246-lot Single-Family Residential Subdivision on 40.05 acres

adjacent to the northwest corner of Charleston Boulevard and Sky VistaDrive. Staff recommended approval of the request.

01/13/05

The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map (TMP-5712) for a 105-lot Single Family Residential Subdivision on 35.8 acres

adjacent to the southwest corner of Charleston Boulevard and Sky Vista

Drive. Staff recommended approval of the request.

05/26/05

The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map (TMP-6375) for a one lot subdivision on 3.14 acres adjacent to the north side of Far

Hills Avenue, approximately 1,500 feet west of Carriage Hills Drive. Staffrecommended approval of the request.

07/13/06

The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map (TMP-13892) for a 246-lot Single Family Residential Subdivision on 40.1 acres at

the intersection of Charleston Boulevard and Sky Vista Drive. Staff


08/10/06

The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map (TMP-14767) for a nine lot Residential Subdivision on 493 acres adjacent to the

northwest corner of Alta Drive and Vista Run Drive. Staff recommended


08/24/06


15017) for a 458-lot Single Family Residential Subdivision on 177.80 acres at

the northwest corner of Alta Drive and Desert Foothills Drive. Staffrecommended approval of the request.

09/11/12


46270) for a 20-pod Single and Multi-Family Residential Subdivision on

439.9 acres at the northwest corner of Desert Foothills Drive and Alta Drive.Staff recommended approval of the request.



TMP-64465 [PRJ-64262]

JB




08/13/13


50099) for a 175-lot Single Family Residential Subdivision on 40.90 acres onthe east side of Fox Hill Drive, approximately 1,360 feet north of Alta Drive.Staff recommended approval of the request.




There are no building permits or business licenses relevant to the subject proposal.


04/14/16A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss submittal

requirements for a Tentative Map.



F ield Check

05/05/16The subject site is currently undeveloped with several single-family

residential developments under construction to the south, west and east.


Site Area

Net Acres 18.56

Surrounding

Property

Ex isting Land Use

Per Ti tle 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject PropertyProposed Multi-

Family Residential

MF2 (Medium Density

Multi-Family)P-C (Planned Community)

NorthLas Vegas Valley

Water District Pump

Station

PF (Public Facility) P-C (Planned Community)



TMP-64465 [PRJ-64262]

JB



Surrounding

Property

Ex isting Land Use

Per Ti tle 19.12

Planned or Special

Land Use Designation Exi sting Zoning Distri ctSouth Undeveloped P (Parks/Recreation) P-C (Planned Community)

EastProposed Single-

Family ResidentialSF3 (Single Family

Detached)P-C (Planned Community)

West Undeveloped P (Parks/Recreation) P-C (Planned Community)


Summerlin Y




Trails N/A





Pursuant to the Summerli n Development Standards, the foll owing standards apply:

Ex isting Zoning Permit ted Density Units Al lowed Units ProvidedP-C [MF2] 21 du/ac 389 202

Standard Required/Al lowed Provided Compliance

Min. Setbacks:

Exterior property

lines of the

development

20 Feet 20 Feet Y

Distance between

Buildings

10 Feet 10 Feet Y



TMP-64465 [PRJ-64262]

JB

Staff Report Page Six


Street Name

Functional

Classif ication of

Street(s)

Govern ing Document

Actual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliance

with Street

SectionAntelope Ridge

DriveLocal Street

Planned Streets and

Highways Map 44 N/A

19.04.040 Connectivi ty

Transportati on Network Element # L inks # Nodes

Internal Street 16

Intersection – Internal 12

Cul-de-sac Terminus 9

Intersection – External Street or Stub Terminus 0

Intersection – Stub Terminus w/ Temporary Turn AroundEasements

0 0

Non-Vehicular Path - Unrestricted 0

Total 16 21

Required Provided

Connectivity Ratio (L inks / Nodes): N/A 0.76

Pursuant to Titl e 19.08 and 19.12, the foll owing parking standards apply:

Parki ng Requi rement

UseGross F loorArea or

Number of

Units

Requi red Provided Compli ance

Parking Ratio

Parking Parking

Regul

ar

Handi-

cappedRegular

Handi-

capped

Single-FamilyAttached

Townhomes

202 du2 spaces per

du404

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 404 527 Y

Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 404 0 527 0 Y



ｘㅡ゜ธฎ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ″ธ

TMP-64465



ｘㅡ゜ธฎ゜

″


TMP-64465



ｘㅡ゜ธฎ゜

″


TMP-64465



ｘㅡ゜ธฎ゜

″


TMP-64465



Ɔ ● ╗ ǲ О Ձ A Ќ

Ｃ ● Ɔ Ձ A ● Ҝ ǲ Ő Ќ Ḷ ╗ ǲ

Ձ ǲ Ḛ ǲ Ќ Ｃ

Ձ ǲ Ḛ A Ձ Ｃ ǲ Ɔ Ő ● О ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

Ɔ Ġ ǲ ǲ ╗ ● Ќ Ｃ ǲ Ṳ

A Ќ ╗ ǲ Ձ Ḷ

О ǲ Ő ● Ｃ

Ḛ ǲ Ｃ Ő ● Ћ

ǲ

ㅡ

О

A Ő Ġ ● Ձ Ձ Ɔ A Ћ ǲ Ќ Ⓢ ǲ

Ḷ Ṳ Ġ ● Ձ Ձ Ｃ Ő ● Ћ ǲ

ฎ

О

Ő

Ա A Ɔ ● Ɔ Ḷ Ա ǲ A Ő ● Ќ Ḛ Ɔ

Ա ǲ Ќ Ġ Ҝ A Ő

Ḛ ǲ Ќ ǲ Ő A Ձ Ќ Ḷ ╗ ǲ Ɔ

╗ ǲ Ќ ╗ A ╗ ● Ћ ǲ Ҝ A О Ḷ Ő

Ɔ A Ќ ╗

A Ő Ḷ Ɔ A ╗ Ḷ Û Ќ Ġ Ḷ Ҝ

ǲ Ɔ

● ╗ Ḷ Ձ A Ɔ Ћ ǲ Ḛ A Ɔ ⓒ Ќ ǲ Ћ A Ｃ A

Ա Ő Ձ A Ќ Ｃ Ġ Ḷ Ҝ ǲ Ɔ

ฎ ㈠ㄦ

″ ો ゜ A Ő ǲ Ɔ

A О Ќ

ՙ ธ ՙ ՙ ՙ ｘｘ

A ╗ Ḷ Û Ќ Ġ

Ḷ Ҝ ǲ Ő ǲ Ɔ ● Ｃ ǲ Ќ ╗ ● A Ձ Ɔ Ⓢ Ա Ｃ

● Ћ ● Ɔ ● Ḷ Ќ

Ɔ Ⓢ Ҝ

Ҝ ǲ Ő Ձ ● Ќ Ћ ● Ձ Ձ A Ḛ ǲ ธ Ա О A Ő ǲ Ձ A

A

ں

О

Ġ

Ձ A Ќ Ｃ Ⓢ Ɔ ǲ ● Ќ

Ḷ Ő Ҝ A ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

Ћ ● ● Ќ ● ╗ Ҝ A О

ㅡ ธ ㄦＣ Ŵ Ҝ Ŵ ผ ħ Ｃ ผ ħ ⓒ Ɔ ħ ｘｘ ⓒ Ձ Ŵ Ћ Ŵ ⓒ Ќ Ћ ฎ ɱ ｘ О Ġ ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ ㅡ ㄦ㈠ｘ ฎ ｘｘ A Ṳ ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ ㅡ ㄦ㈠ｘ ฎ ｘ

Ќ Ｃ ǲ Ṳ ｘ

ㄦ゜ ธ ゜ ″

О Ő İ ″ ㅡ ธ ″ ธ

T M P

6 4 4 6 5 R E

V I S E D





ธ ฎ Ɔ ਙ γ Ġ ħ γ к Ŵ ₡ Ｃ ผ ħ ⓒ Ɔ ħ ฎ ｘ ⓒ Ձ Ŵ Ћ Ŵ ⓒ Ќ Ћ ฎ ɱ ｘ ɱ О Ġ ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ ㅡ ㄦ㈠ｘ ฎ ｘｘ A Ṳ ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ ㅡ ㄦ㈠ｘ ฎ ｘ

ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ ″


T M P 6 4 4 6 5



О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ Ḷ Ҝ Ҝ Ⓢ Ќ ● ╗ ǲ Ќ ╗ Ő Ő Ḷ A Ｃ

Ḷ Ќ Ɔ ● ╗ ǲ О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ ƥ Ɔ ╗ Ő ǲ ǲ ╗

Ḷ Ќ Ɔ ● ╗ ǲ О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ ƥ Ɔ ╗ Ő ǲ ǲ ╗

A Ő Ġ ● Ձ Ձ Ɔ

A Ћ ǲ ㈠ ǲ Ｃ Ḛ ǲ Ḷ Ќ Ｃ ● ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

ธ ฎ Ɔ ਙ γ Ġ ħ γ к Ŵ ₡ Ｃ ผ ħ ⓒ Ɔ ħ ฎ ｘ ⓒ Ձ Ŵ Ћ Ŵ ⓒ Ќ Ћ ฎ ɱ ｘ ɱ О Ġ ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ ㅡ ㄦ㈠ｘ ฎ ｘｘ A Ṳ ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ ㅡ ㄦ㈠ｘ ฎ ｘ

Ћ ● Ձ Ձ A Ḛ ǲ Û A Ձ Ձ Ｃ ǲ ╗ A ● Ձ

ㅡ

″

Ḷ Ќ Ɔ ● ╗ ǲ О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ ธ ㄦ ƥ Ɔ ╗ Ő ǲ ǲ ╗

ㄦ

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ Ḷ Ҝ Ҝ Ⓢ Ќ ● ╗ ǲ Ќ ╗ Ő Ő Ḷ A Ｃ

ธ

Ḷ Ṳ Ġ ● Ձ Ձ Ｃ Ő ● Ћ ǲ ǲ Ｃ Ḛ ǲ Ḷ Ќ Ｃ ● ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

ՙ

A Ќ ╗ ǲ Ձ Ḷ О ǲ Ő ● Ｃ Ḛ ǲ

Ｃ Ő ● Ћ ǲ ǲ Ｃ Ḛ ǲ Ḷ Ќ Ｃ ● ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

ฎ

A Ќ ╗ ǲ Ձ Ḷ О ǲ Ő ● Ｃ Ḛ ǲ Ｃ Ő ● Ћ ǲ ǲ Ｃ Ḛ ǲ Ḷ Ќ Ｃ ● ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

ɱ

Ḷ Ќ Ɔ ● ╗ ǲ

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ ธ ㄦ ƥ Ɔ ╗ Ő ǲ ǲ ╗

ｘ

ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ ″








ｘㅡ゜ธฎ゜

″


TMP-64465



ｘㅡ゜ธฎ゜

″


TMP-64465





T M P -

6 4 4 6 5 [ P R J -

6 4 2

6 2 ] -

T E N T A T I V E M A P -

A P P L

I C A N T : R Y L A N D

H O M E S N E V A D A ,

L L C -

O W N E R :

T H E H O W A R D H U G H E S C O M P A N Y ,

L L C

S O U T H E A S T C O R N E R

O F F O X H I L L S D R I V E A N D F A R H I L L S A V E N U E

0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6



T M P -

6 4 4 6 5 [ P R J -

6 4 2

6 2 ] -

T E N T A T I V E M A P -

A P P L

I C A N T : R Y L A N D

H O M E S N E V A D A ,

L L C -

O W N E R :

T H E H O W A R D H U G H E S C O M P A N Y ,

L L C


O F F O X H I L L S D R I V E A N D F A R H I L L S A V E N U E

0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6



ｘㄦ゜

ՙ゜

″


TMP-64465 - REVISED



ｘㄦ゜

ՙ゜

″


TMP-64465 - REVISED



ｘㅡ゜ธฎ゜

″


TMP-64465








SUBJECT:SCD-64471 - MAJOR DEVIATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CALIDA

RESIDENTIAL, LLC - OWNER: HINES INTERESTS LP, ET AL - For possible action on a

request for a Major Deviation of the Summerlin Development Standards TO ALLOW 218PARKING SPACES WHERE 261 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED

SPECIAL CARE FACILITY AND ASSISTED LIVING APARTMENTS on 11.01 acres at the

north corner of Desert Crossing Court and Center Crossing Road (APNs 138-19-419-006 and a

portion of 138-30-113-011), P-C (Planned Community) Zone [EC (Employment Center)Summerlin North Special Land Use Designation], Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-64230]. Staff









2. Conditions and Staff Report

3. Supporting Documentation4. Photo(s)


6. Approval Letter from the Howard Hughes Corporation







SCD-64471 [PRJ-64230]

YK




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: CALIDA RESIDENTIAL, LLC - OWNER: HINES

INTERESTS LP, ET AL


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

SCD-64471 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **


NOTICES MAILED 877

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0

** CONDITIONS **

SCD-64471 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to a future City Referral Group application for this site.

2. This approval shall be void one year from the date of final approval, unless a building

permit has been issued for the principal building on the site. An Extension of Time may befiled for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.



SCD-64471 [PRJ-64230]

YK



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting a Major Deviation from the Summerlin Development DesignStandards to allow a 17 percent reduction of the required parking. The request would allow 218

parking spaces where 261 are required for a proposed two-building, 214,722 square-foot Special

Care Facility and Assisted Living Apartments at the north end of Desert Crossing Court and

Center Crossing Road.

ISSUES

A Major Deviation from the Summerlin Design Standards for parking is similar to a

Variance when related to parking requirements not being met. Staff supports the request.

ANALYSIS

The applicant hired a local Engineering firm to conduct a parking study to determine the parking

that could be expected from the development. This study was dated April 4, 2016 and consisted

of observing four similar facilities in the area of the proposed Summerlin development. This

study determined that the suggested number of parking spaces required would be 218 spaces and

the applicant is providing 218 spaces. The study was reviewed by staff who concurred with thefindings. An approval letter from the Master Developer of the Summerlin Community, Howard

Hughes, via the Summerlin Non-Residential Design Review Committee also supports thefindings. As a result, staff recommends approval of the request.

A Major Deviation within the Summerlin Master Planned Community requires the application bereferred to the Planning Commission for review and decision. If approved, a Certificate of

Deviation shall be issued to the requesting party. Said certificate shall state the name and

address of the owner, legal description of the property, and a reasonably detailed description of

the deviation granted. All deviations must be exercised within one year from the date ofapproval, or the deviation shall be null and void.

FINDINGS (SCD-64471)

The proposed project must still be reviewed and approved through the City Referral Group

process, which will be conducted if the requested deviation is approved. A condition of approvalhas been added for this requirement.



SCD-64471 [PRJ-64230]

YK



Evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the applicant has

presented a parking analysis that supports the applicants proposed number of parking spaces. Inview of this report, it is concluded that the applicant’s hardship is not preferential in nature and

will not negatively impact the surrounding adjacent uses. Staff recommends approval.



06/03/93The City Council approved a Development Agreement for SummerloinVillage 8, which includes the subject site. The Planning Commission and

staff recommended approval.

02/16/94

The City Council approved a Development Agreement for Summerloin

Villages 10, 11, 12 and 26, which includes the subject site. The PlanningCommission and staff recommended approval.

02/28/97

The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0119-96) from N-U (Non-Urban)to P-C (Planned Community) on 8,318 acres along the west side of Clark

County 215, between Charleston Boulevard and Lake Mead Boulevard. The

Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.


08/13/15 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.*

The applicant is in escrow to purchase a small section of APN #138-30-113-011 and has

an approved application signed by the owner for this project.


No related permits are on file for this project.


04/12/16

Staff met with the applicant and reviewed a proposed two-building Special

Care Facility and Assisted Living Apartment project located in the Summerlin

Overlay area of the city. Staff determined that the project does not meet the parking requirements for the proposed uses and is deficient 43 spaces.

Although Summerlin has approved the deficiency, it still requires a publichearing before the City Council for a Major Deviation from the SummerlinDesign Standards as a SCD application. This is similar to a Variance

application.

It was also determined that the project would require a City Referral Group

application. The applicant chose to not submit this application until after the

SCD application is heard and approved.



SCD-64471 [PRJ-64230]

YK





F ield Check

05/05/16Staff visited the site and found a trash-free undeveloped parcel with desert

vegetation throughout. No issues were noted.


Site Area

Net Acres 11.01

Surrounding

Property

Ex isting Land Use

Per Ti tle 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject Property UndevelopedEC (Employment

Center)P-C (Planned Community)

NorthSummerlin Parkway

Right-of-WaySummerlin Parkway

Right-of-WaySummerlin Parkway

Right-of-Way

South OfficeEC (Employment


East Undeveloped EC (EmploymentCenter)

P-C (Planned Community)

WestStorage EC (Employment


Parking Lot


Summerlin N*




Trails N/A




*A Summerlin Community Development (SCD) major application will be applied for afterreview/approval of this application.



SCD-64471 [PRJ-64230]

YK




Street Name

Functional

Classif ication of

Street(s)

Govern ing Document

Actual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliance

with Street

Section

Center CrossingRoad

Private Drive

N/A

50 N/A

Desert Crossing

CourtPrivate Drive 50 N/A

Summerlin Parkway FreewayPlanned Streets and

Highways Map350 Y



Use

Gross F loor

Area or

Number of

Units


Parking

Ratio

Parking Parking

RegularHandi-capped

RegularHandi-capped

Special Care

Facility

180 beds, plus45 employees

on largestshift

1 space

per bed,

plus 1

space peremployee

on largest

shift

225

AssistedLiving

Apartments

106 residents

1 space per every

three

residents

36

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 261 218 N


Percent Deviation 17%



ОŐİ ″ㅡธｘ

ｘㅡ゜ธฎ゜

″

ОŐİ

″ㅡธｘ

SCD-64471



ｘㅡ゜ธฎ゜

″

ОŐİ

″ㅡธｘ

SCD-64471





ɱ㈠″ Ŵ㌱ผ ӧㅡ ՙⓒｘㄦｘ ⑾ỏ

ธㅡธⓒธㄦㄦ ⑾ ㈠ՙ

ธㅡㅡ Ⓢħש ธㄦ㈠ㅡ Ⓢħש Ŵ㌱ผ

ｘㅡ゜ธฎ゜

″

ОŐİ

″ㅡธｘ

SCD-64471



ｘㅡ゜ธฎ゜

″

ОŐİ

″ㅡธｘ

SCD-64471






ｘㅡ゜ธฎ゜

″

ОŐİ

″ㅡธｘ

SCD-64471



ｘㅡ゜ธฎ゜

″

ОŐİ

″ㅡธｘ

SCD-64471



ｘㅡ゜ธฎ゜

″

ОŐİ

″ㅡธｘ

SCD-64471



ｘㅡ゜ธฎ゜

″

ОŐİ

″ㅡธｘ

SCD-64471






ｘㅡ゜ธฎ゜

″

ОŐİ

″ㅡธｘ

SCD-64471











Ḛ Ő A О Ġ ●

Ɔ A Ձ ǲ

ӧ फ ए ㅡ ｘ ƥ ｘ फ ỏ

ｘ ƥ

ธ ㄦ ƥ

ｘｘ ƥ

ㄦｘ ƥ

ผ ਙ ħ

Ŵ ผ

Ŵ こ ऑ

Ձ Ŵ ₡ ㌱ Ŵ ऑ

О к Ŵ

Ձ О ｘｘ

Ќ ਙ ผ γ ʉ

㌱ ਙ ผ

ผ ਙ ⑾ Ｃ

ผ

ผ ਙ ħ

ਙ ผ

Ŵ ₡

ผ ผ ਙ ħ

Ő ਙ Ŵ ₡

Ɔ

ここ

ผ к ħ

Ћ ħ к к Ŵ

ฎ

Ձ Ŵ Ћ

ف

Ŵ

ⓒ Ќ

Ŵ ₡ Ŵ

ฎ ɱ ㅡ ㅡ

ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ ″

О Ő İ ″ ㅡ ธ ｘ















ｘｘ ″

ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ ″


S C

D

6 4 4 7 1



ｘｘ ՙ

ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ ″


S C

D

6 4 4 7 1



ｘｘ ฎ

ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ ″






ｘ ㅡ ㈠ ธ ㄦ㈠ ธ ｘ ″

Ձ A Ɔ Ћ ǲ Ḛ A Ɔ ⓒ

Ќ Ћ

Ɔ Ⓢ Ҝ Ҝ ǲ Ő Ձ ● Ќ

Ћ ● Ձ Ձ A Ḛ ǲ ฎ

Ő Ḷ Ɔ Ɔ ● Ќ Ḛ Ɔ A Ő ǲ A Ҝ О Ⓢ Ɔ

╗ Ḛ ธ

ｘㄦｘｘ ㅡ

╗ γ

Ŵ к ħ ₡ Ŵ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ

ｘ ՙ ՙ ՙ Û

㈠ ╗ ʉ Ŵ

ħ A

㈠ Ɔ

ħ

ㄦ

Ձ Ŵ

Ћ

Ŵ ⓒ

Ќ Ћ ฎ ɱ ㄦ

ՙ ｘ ธ

㈠ ɱ ㅡ ՙ

㈠ ธ ｘｘｘ

╗

Ḛ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ ⓒ

● ㌱㈠

A ผ ㌱ γ ħ

㌱ ผ ો О к Ŵ ħ

ธ

ㄦㄦㄦ Û

İ ⑾ ⑾ ผ ਙ

Ա кٹ ₡

㈠ ⓒ

Ɔ

ħ

ｘｘ

Ձ ਙ

A

к ⓒ

A

ɱ ｘｘ ″ ″

ｘ㈠

ɱ ㅡ

㈠ ธ ″ ธ

㌱

ਙ こ

О ǲ Ő Ɔ О ǲ ╗ ● Ћ ǲ Ћ ● ǲ Û

ǲ Ћ ｘ ″

Ա Ⓢ ● Ձ Ｃ

● Ќ Ḛ A

Ɔ О ǲ ● A Ձ A Ő ǲ A ● Ձ ● ╗

ｘｘ

к к к к к к к к кٹ

ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ ″


S C D

6 4 4 7 1



ｘ ㅡ ㈠ ธ ㄦ㈠ ธ ｘ ″


Ќ Ћ




╗ Ḛ ธ

ｘㄦｘｘ ㅡ

╗ γ

Ŵ к ħ ₡ Ŵ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ

ｘ ՙ ՙ ՙ Û

㈠ ╗ ʉ Ŵ

ħ A

㈠ Ɔ

ħ

ㄦ

Ձ Ŵ

Ћ

Ŵ ⓒ

Ќ Ћ ฎ ɱ ㄦ

ՙ ｘ ธ

㈠ ɱ ㅡ ՙ

㈠ ธ ｘｘｘ

╗

Ḛ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ ⓒ

● ㌱㈠

A ผ ㌱ γ ħ


ธ

ㄦㄦㄦ Û

İ ⑾ ⑾ ผ ਙ

Ա кٹ ₡

㈠ ⓒ

Ɔ

ħ

ｘｘ

Ձ ਙ

A

к ⓒ

A

ɱ ｘｘ ″ ″

ｘ㈠

ɱ ㅡ

㈠ ธ ″ ธ

㌱

ਙ こ


ǲ Ћ ｘ ՙ

Ա Ⓢ ● Ձ Ｃ

● Ќ Ḛ A

Ɔ О ǲ ● A Ձ A Ő ǲ A ● Ձ ● ╗

ｘ


ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ ″


S C D

6 4 4 7 1



ｘ ㅡ ㈠ ธ ㄦ㈠ ธ ｘ ″


Ќ Ћ




╗ Ḛ ธ

ｘㄦｘｘ ㅡ

╗ γ

Ŵ к ħ ₡ Ŵ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ

ｘ ՙ ՙ ՙ Û

㈠ ╗ ʉ Ŵ

ħ A

㈠ Ɔ

ħ

ㄦ

Ձ Ŵ

Ћ

Ŵ ⓒ

Ќ Ћ ฎ ɱ ㄦ

ՙ ｘ ธ

㈠ ɱ ㅡ ՙ

㈠ ธ ｘｘｘ

╗

Ḛ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ ⓒ

● ㌱㈠

A ผ ㌱ γ ħ


ธ

ㄦㄦㄦ Û

İ ⑾ ⑾ ผ ਙ

Ա кٹ ₡

㈠ ⓒ

Ɔ

ħ

ｘｘ

Ձ ਙ

A

к ⓒ

A

ɱ ｘｘ ″ ″

ｘ㈠

ɱ ㅡ

㈠ ธ ″ ธ

㌱

ਙ こ


ǲ Ћ ｘ ฎ

Ա Ⓢ ● Ձ Ｃ

● Ќ Ḛ A

Ɔ О ǲ ● A Ձ A Ő ǲ A ● Ձ ● ╗

ｘ ธ


ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ ″


S C D

6 4 4 7 1









ｘ

″

ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ ″




ｘ ㅡ ㈠ ธ ㄦ㈠ ธ ｘ ″


Ќ Ћ




╗ Ḛ ธ

ｘㄦｘｘ ㅡ

╗ γ

Ŵ к ħ ₡ Ŵ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ

ｘ ՙ ՙ ՙ Û

㈠ ╗ ʉ Ŵ

ħ A

㈠ Ɔ

ħ

ㄦ

Ձ Ŵ

Ћ

Ŵ ⓒ

Ќ Ћ ฎ ɱ ㄦ

ՙ ｘ ธ

㈠ ɱ ㅡ ՙ

㈠ ธ ｘｘｘ

╗

Ḛ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ ⓒ

● ㌱㈠

A ผ ㌱ γ ħ

㌱ ผ

ો О к Ŵ ħ

ธ

ㄦㄦㄦ Û

İ ⑾ ⑾ ผ ਙ

Ա кٹ ₡

㈠ ⓒ

Ɔ

ħ

ｘｘ

Ձ ਙ

A

к ⓒ

A

ɱ ｘｘ ″ ″

ｘ㈠

ɱ ㅡ

㈠ ธ ″ ธ

㌱

ਙ こ


ǲ Ћ ธ ｘ

Ա Ⓢ ● Ձ Ｃ

● Ќ Ḛ Ա

A Ɔ Ɔ ● Ɔ ╗ ǲ Ｃ

Ձ ● Ћ ● Ќ Ḛ

A Ќ Ｃ Ҝ ǲ Ҝ Ḷ

Ő

A Ő ǲ

ｘ ՙ

к к к к к к к к кٹ ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ ″


S C

D

6 4 4 7 1



ｘ ㅡ ㈠ ธ ㄦ㈠ ธ ｘ ″

Ձ A Ɔ Ћ ǲ Ḛ A Ɔ ⓒ Ќ Ћ




╗ Ḛ ธ ｘㄦｘｘ ㅡ

╗ γ

Ŵ к ħ ₡ Ŵ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ

ｘ ՙ ՙ ՙ Û

㈠ ╗ ʉ Ŵ

ħ A

㈠ Ɔ

ħ

ㄦ

Ձ Ŵ

Ћ

Ŵ ⓒ

Ќ Ћ ฎ ɱ ㄦ

ՙ ｘ ธ

㈠ ɱ ㅡ ՙ

㈠ ธ ｘｘｘ

╗

Ḛ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ ⓒ

● ㌱㈠

A ผ ㌱ γ ħ

㌱ ผ

ો О к Ŵ ħ

ธ

ㄦㄦㄦ Û

İ ⑾ ⑾ ผ ਙ

Ա кٹ ₡

㈠ ⓒ

Ɔ

ħ

ｘｘ

Ձ ਙ

A

к ⓒ

A

ɱ ｘｘ ″ ″

ｘ㈠

ɱ ㅡ

㈠ ธ ″ ธ

㌱

ਙ こ


ǲ Ћ ธ ｘ ㅡ

Ա Ⓢ ● Ձ Ｃ

● Ќ Ḛ Ա

A Ɔ Ɔ ● Ɔ ╗ ǲ Ｃ Ձ ● Ћ ● Ќ Ḛ


Ő A Ő ǲ

ｘ ฎ

к к к к к к к к кٹ ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ ″








Ɔ О ǲ ● A Ձ A Ő ǲ A ● Ձ ● ╗

ǲ Ќ ╗ ǲ Ő ǲ Ќ ╗ Ő

Ġ ● Ḛ Ġ A Ⓢ ● ╗

Ҝ ǲ Ҝ Ḷ Ő A Ő ǲ

ǲ Ќ ╗ Ő

Ɔ ǲ Ő Ћ ● ǲ

ǲ Ќ ╗ Ő

A Ｃ Ҝ ● Ќ ゜ ╗ Ġ ǲ Ő A О

● ╗ Ġ ǲ Ќ

Ձ ● Ћ ● Ќ Ḛ

Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ

Ɔ О ǲ ● A Ձ A Ő ǲ A ● Ձ ● ╗

Ḷ Ⓢ Ő ╗ A Ő Ｃ

Ġ ● Ḛ Ġ A Ⓢ ● ╗



Ա Ḷ Ġ ゜ Ɔ ǲ Ő Ћ ● ǲ A Ő ǲ A

ӧ ● ╗ Ġ ǲ Ќ

ⓒ Ձ A Ⓢ Ќ Ｃ Ő

ⓒ

Ɔ ╗ Ḷ Ő A Ḛ ǲ

ⓒ ǲ ╗ ỏ

Ḛ Ő ǲ A ╗ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ

Ɔ О ǲ ● A Ձ A Ő ǲ A ● Ձ ● ╗


● ╗ Ġ

ǲ Ќ

Ｃ ● Ќ ● Ќ Ḛ

ӧ ㄤｘ Ŵ

ỏ

Ձ ● Ћ ● Ќ Ḛ

Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ

Ќ Ⓢ Ő Ɔ ǲ

Ɔ ╗ A ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

Ձ ● Ћ ● Ќ Ḛ

Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ

Ḷ ● ǲ

Ｃ ● Ќ ● Ќ Ḛ

ӧ ㄤㄦ Ɔ ǲ A ╗ Ɔ ỏ

A ╗ ● Ћ ● ╗

Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ

Ɔ ǲ Ő Ћ ● ǲ

Ɔ ╗ A Ձ Ḷ

Ⓢ Ќ Ḛ ǲ

● ╗ Ġ ǲ Ќ

Ｃ ● Ќ ● Ќ Ḛ

ӧ ㄤ ㅡ ㄦ

Ŵ

ỏ

Ḷ ● ǲ

Ɔ ╗ Ḷ Ő A Ḛ ǲ

Ќ Ɔ

Ձ ● Ћ ● Ќ Ḛ

Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ

A ╗ ● Ћ ● ╗

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ Ｃ ● Ќ

● Ќ Ḛ

Ձ ● Ћ ● Ќ

Ḛ

Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ

Ɔ ㈠ Ձ ㈠

A ╗ ● Ћ ● ╗ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ Ｃ ● Ќ ● Ќ Ḛ

Ձ ● Ћ ● Ќ Ḛ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ

Ќ Ɔ

㈠ Ձ ㈠

A ╗

● Ћ ● ╗

Ő Ḷ

Ḷ Ҝ

İ

Ɔ ╗

㈠

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ

Ｃ ● Ќ ● Ќ Ḛ

ӧ ㄤㄦ

Ŵ

ỏ

Ḷ ● ǲ

Ɔ ╗

㈠

İ

Ḷ

● ǲ

Ɔ ǲ Ő Ћ ● ǲ

Ɔ ǲ ǲ Ɔ Ġ ǲ ǲ ╗ О ｘｘ ธ

ฎ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ㅡ ƥ ｘ फ

ɱ

ƥ ｘ फ

Ő ｘ ƥ ｘ

फ

Ő ｘ ƥ ｘ फ

Ő ｘ ƥ ｘ फ

Ő ธ ฎ

ƥ ｘ फ

ｘ ƥ ｘ फ

ㄦ ธ ƥ ｘ फ

″ ㄦ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ″ ƥ ㅡ फ ฎ ƥ ｘ फ ｘ ƥ ฎ फ

ɱ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ｘ ƥ ㄦ ธ ՙ ゜ ″ ㅡ फ ｘㄦ ƥ ｘ ɱ ゜ ธ ㄦ ″ फ ″ ƥ फ

ㅡ ƥ ธ ɱ ɱ ゜ ธ ㄦ ″ फ

ฎ ƥ फ

ՙ ″ ƥ ｘ फ

ｘ ƥ ㄦ फ

ธ ɱ ㄦ ƥ ㄦ फ

ɱ

ƥ ㄦ फ

ƥ ″ फ

ㄦ ฎ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ธ ƥ ธ फ

ธ ㅡ ƥ ՙ फ

ㅡ ｘ ƥ ″ फ

″ ɱ ƥ ″ फ

ǲ Ќ ╗ ǲ Ő

Ɔ ǲ ǲ Ɔ Ġ ǲ ǲ ╗ О ｘｘ ธ

ｘ ㅡ ㈠ ธ ㄦ㈠ ธ ｘ ″


Ќ Ћ




╗ Ḛ ธ

ｘㄦｘｘ ㅡ

╗ γ

Ŵ к ħ ₡ Ŵ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ

ｘ ՙ ՙ ՙ Û

㈠ ╗ ʉ Ŵ

ħ A

㈠ Ɔ

ħ

ㄦ

Ձ Ŵ

Ћ

Ŵ ⓒ

Ќ Ћ ฎ ɱ ㄦ

ՙ ｘ ธ

㈠ ɱ ㅡ ՙ

㈠ ธ ｘｘｘ

╗

Ḛ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ ⓒ

● ㌱㈠

A ผ ㌱ γ ħ


ธ

ㄦㄦㄦ Û

İ ⑾ ⑾ ผ ਙ

Ա кٹ ₡

㈠ ⓒ

Ɔ

ħ

ｘｘ

Ձ ਙ

A

к ⓒ

A

ɱ ｘｘ ″ ″

ｘ㈠

ɱ ㅡ

㈠ ธ ″ ธ

㌱

ਙ こ

Ḛ Ő Ḷ Ⓢ Ќ

Ｃ

Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő О Ձ A Ќ О A Ő ╗ ● A Ձ

О ｘｘ

ฎ

ں

゜ ″ फ ए

ƥ ｘ फ

㌀

ｘ Ṳ

ㅡ ธ

Ա Ⓢ ● Ձ

Ｃ

● Ќ Ḛ A

Ɔ О ǲ ● A Ձ A Ő ǲ

A ● Ձ ● ╗

ǲ О Ձ A Ќ Ќ

㈠ ╗ ㈠ Ɔ ㈠


ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ ″


S C

D

6 4 4 7 1





к

к

Ŵ⑾

к

к

к

к

Ɔ О ǲ ● A Ձ A Ő ǲ A ● Ձ ● ╗

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ Ɔ ╗ Ⓢ Ｃ ● Ḷ ╗ О ǲ A

ㄦ ″ Ɔ

Ɔ О ǲ ● A Ձ A Ő ǲ A ● Ձ ● ╗

Ɔ ǲ Ҝ ● О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ Ɔ Ⓢ ● ╗ ǲ ╗ О ǲ A

ㄦ ㅡ ธ Ɔ

Ɔ О ǲ ● A Ձ A Ő ǲ A ● Ձ ● ╗

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ Ɔ ╗ Ⓢ Ｃ ● Ḷ ╗ О ǲ Ա

″ ｘ Ɔ

Ɔ О ǲ ● A Ձ A Ő ǲ A ● Ձ ● ╗

Ɔ ǲ Ҝ ● О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ Ɔ Ⓢ ● ╗ ǲ ╗ О ǲ Ա

ㄦ ɱ Ɔ

Ɔ О ǲ ● A Ձ A Ő ǲ A ● Ձ ● ╗

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ Ɔ ╗ Ⓢ Ｃ ● Ḷ ╗ О ǲ

ฎ ｘ Ɔ

ㅡ ƥ ″ फ

ธ ㄦ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ㅡ ƥ ″ फ

ՙ ƥ ｘ फ ՙ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ㄦ ƥ ｘ फ

ㅡ ƥ ″ फ

ƥ ″ फ

ธ ″ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ｘ ƥ ｘ फ

″ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ㄦ ƥ ｘ फ

″ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ㄦ ƥ ｘ फ

ƥ ｘ फ

ㄦ ƥ ｘ फ

ㅡ ƥ ″ फ

ｘ ㅡ ㈠ ธ ㄦ㈠ ธ ｘ ″






╗ γ

Ŵ к ħ ₡ Ŵ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ

ｘ ՙ ՙ ՙ Û

㈠ ╗ ʉ Ŵ

ħ A

㈠ Ɔ

ħ

ㄦ

Ձ Ŵ

Ћ

Ŵ ⓒ

Ќ Ћ ฎ ɱ ㄦ

ՙ ｘ ธ

㈠ ɱ ㅡ ՙ

㈠ ธ ｘｘｘ

╗

Ḛ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ ⓒ

● ㌱㈠

A ผ ㌱ γ ħ


ธ

ㄦㄦㄦ Û

İ ⑾ ⑾ ผ ਙ

Ա кٹ ₡

㈠ ⓒ

Ɔ

ħ

ｘｘ

Ձ ਙ

A

к ⓒ

A

ɱ ｘｘ ″ ″

ｘ㈠

ɱ ㅡ

㈠ ธ ″ ธ

㌱

ਙ こ

Ⓢ Ќ ● ╗ О Ձ A Ќ Ɔ

О ｘｘ

ธ

ㅡ

ฎ

ں

゜ ㅡ फ ए

ƥ ｘ फ

㌀

ｘ Ṳ

ㅡ ธ

Ա Ⓢ ● Ձ Ｃ

● Ќ Ḛ

A

Ɔ О ǲ ● A Ձ A Ő ǲ A ● Ձ ● ╗


ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ ″


S C

D

6 4 4 7 1





Ő ㈠ Ձ ㈠

İ

Ҝ ǲ Ｃ

Û Ḷ Ő

Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ

Ő ㈠ Ձ ㈠

İ

Ҝ ǲ

Ｃ

Û Ḷ Ő

Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ

Ɔ Ձ

Ձ

╗ Ő A Ɔ Ġ

Ḷ О ǲ Ќ ╗ Ḷ

Ա ǲ Ձ Ḷ Û

ӧ ″ ƥ Ṳ ธ ｘ ƥ ỏ

Ձ ● Ա Ő A Ő

ӧ ″ Ɔ ỏ

A Ő ╗

Ő A ╗ Ɔ

Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ

ӧ ㅡ ㄦ ″ Ɔ ỏ

Ɔ ǲ Ő Ћ ● ǲ

ｘ ㅡ ㈠ ธ

ㄦ㈠ ธ

ｘ ″


Ќ Ћ

Ɔ Ⓢ Ҝ Ҝ ǲ Ő Ձ ● Ќ Ћ ● Ձ Ձ A Ḛ ǲ ฎ


╗ Ḛ

ธ ｘㄦｘｘ ㅡ

╗ γ

Ŵ к ħ ₡ Ŵ Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ

ｘ ՙ ՙ ՙ Û

㈠ ╗ ʉ Ŵ

ħ A

㈠ Ɔ

ħ

ㄦ

Ձ Ŵ

Ћ

Ŵ ⓒ

Ќ Ћ ฎ ɱ ㄦ

ՙ ｘ ธ

㈠ ɱ ㅡ ՙ

㈠ ธ ｘｘｘ

╗ Ḛ Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ ⓒ

● ㌱㈠

A ผ ㌱ γ ħ


ธ

ㄦㄦㄦ Û

İ ⑾ ⑾ ผ ਙ

Ա кٹ ₡

㈠ ⓒ

Ɔ

ħ

ｘｘ

Ձ ਙ

A

к ⓒ

A

ɱ ｘｘ ″ ″

ｘ㈠

ɱ ㅡ

㈠ ธ ″ ธ

㌱

ਙ こ

Ɔ ǲ Ḷ Ќ Ｃ

Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő

О Ձ A Ќ

О ｘｘㄦ

ฎ

ں

゜ ″ फ ए

ƥ ｘ फ ㌀

ｘ Ṳ

ㅡ ธ

Ա Ⓢ ● Ձ Ｃ

● Ќ Ḛ

Ա

A Ɔ Ɔ ● Ɔ ╗ ǲ Ｃ

Ձ ● Ћ ● Ќ Ḛ

A Ќ Ｃ

Ҝ ǲ Ҝ Ḷ

Ő

A Ő ǲ


ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ ″


S C D

6 4 4 7 1



A Ɔ Ⓢ A Ձ Ｃ ● Ќ ● Ќ Ḛ

ӧ ɱ ㄦｘ Ɔ ỏ

A О О Ő Ḷ Ṳ

㈠ㄦｘ Ɔ ǲ A ╗ Ɔ

Ḷ Ⓢ ╗ Ｃ Ḷ Ḷ Ő

О A ╗ ● Ḷ

ӧ

ฎ ㄦ Ɔ ỏ

Ő ㈠ Ձ ㈠

İ

Ҝ ǲ

Ｃ

Û Ḷ Ő

Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ

Ő ㈠ Ձ ㈠

İ

Ҝ ǲ Ｃ

Û Ḷ Ő

Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ

● Ｃ Ɔ О Ձ A Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ

ӧ ″ ㅡ ㄦ Ɔ ỏ

A ╗ ● Ћ ● ╗ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ

ӧ ╗ Ћ ゜ Ḛ A Ҝ ǲ ỏ

ӧ ㅡ ″ ธ Ɔ ỏ

● ╗ Ġ ǲ Ќ

Ɔ ǲ Ő Ћ ǲ Ő

Ձ

İ

Ḷ Ⓢ ╗ Ｃ Ḷ Ḷ Ő Ｃ ǲ

ӧ ″ ฎ

Ɔ ỏ

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ Ｃ ● Ќ ● Ќ Ḛ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ

ӧ ฎ ฎ ｘ Ɔ ỏ

A О О Ő Ḷ Ṳ

㈠ ธ ｘ Ɔ ǲ A ╗ Ɔ

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ Ｃ ● Ќ ● Ќ Ḛ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ

ӧ ธ ฎ ″ Ɔ ỏ

A О О Ő Ḷ Ṳ

㈠ㄦｘ Ɔ ǲ A ╗ Ɔ

Ձ

Ɔ Ձ

╗ Ő A Ɔ Ġ

ｘ ㅡ ㈠ ธ ㄦ㈠ ธ ｘ ″


Ќ Ћ



╗ Ḛ ธ

ｘㄦｘｘ ㅡ

╗ γ

Ŵ к ħ ₡ Ŵ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ

ｘ ՙ ՙ ՙ Û

㈠ ╗ ʉ Ŵ

ħ A

㈠ Ɔ

ħ

ㄦ

Ձ Ŵ

Ћ

Ŵ ⓒ

Ќ Ћ ฎ ɱ ㄦ

ՙ ｘ ธ

㈠ ɱ ㅡ ՙ

㈠ ธ ｘｘｘ

╗

Ḛ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ ⓒ

● ㌱㈠

A ผ ㌱ γ ħ


ธ

ㄦㄦㄦ Û

İ ⑾ ⑾ ผ ਙ

Ա кٹ ₡

㈠ ⓒ

Ɔ

ħ

ｘｘ

Ձ ਙ

A

к ⓒ

A

ɱ ｘｘ ″ ″

ｘ㈠

ɱ ㅡ

㈠ ธ ″ ธ

㌱

ਙ こ

╗ Ġ ● Ő Ｃ Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő О Ձ A Ќ

О ธ ｘ

ฎ

ں

゜ ″ फ ए

ƥ ｘ फ

㌀

ｘ Ṳ

ㅡ ธ

Ա Ⓢ ● Ձ Ｃ

● Ќ Ḛ Ա

A Ɔ Ɔ ● Ɔ ╗ ǲ Ｃ Ձ ● Ћ ● Ќ Ḛ A Ќ Ｃ Ҝ ǲ Ҝ Ḷ

Ő

A Ő ǲ

ｘｘ ″


ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ ″




к

к

к

к

к

к

к

к

A Ɔ Ɔ ● Ɔ ╗ ǲ Ｃ Ձ ● Ћ ● Ќ Ḛ

Ɔ ╗ Ⓢ Ｃ ● Ḷ ╗ О ǲ A

ㅡ ՙ ㅡ Ɔ

A Ɔ Ɔ ● Ɔ ╗ ǲ Ｃ Ձ ● Ћ ● Ќ Ḛ

Ա ǲ Ｃ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ ╗ О ǲ A

ㄦ ɱ ｘ Ɔ

A Ɔ Ɔ ● Ɔ ╗ ǲ Ｃ Ձ ● Ћ ● Ќ Ḛ

Ա ǲ Ｃ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ ╗ О ǲ Ա

″ ｘｘ Ɔ

A Ɔ Ɔ ● Ɔ ╗ ǲ Ｃ Ձ ● Ћ ● Ќ Ḛ

ธ Ա ǲ Ｃ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ ╗ О ǲ A

ฎ ฎ ｘ Ɔ

A Ɔ Ɔ ● Ɔ ╗ ǲ Ｃ Ձ ● Ћ ● Ќ Ḛ

Ɔ ╗ Ⓢ Ｃ ● Ḷ

╗ О ǲ Ա

ㅡ ฎ ｘ Ɔ

A Ɔ Ɔ ● Ɔ ╗ ǲ Ｃ Ձ ● Ћ ● Ќ Ḛ

Ɔ ╗ Ⓢ Ｃ ● Ḷ ╗ О ǲ

ฎ ธ Ɔ

ɱ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ㄦ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ｘ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ㅡ ƥ ″ फ

ㄦ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ″ ƥ ″ फ

ธ ㄦ ƥ ｘ फ

ՙ ƥ ธ फ ՙ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ㄦ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ㄦ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ƥ ธ फ ՙ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ɱ ƥ ｘ फ

ƥ फ

ธ ธ ƥ ″ फ ธ ƥ ″ फ

ธ ″ ƥ ″ फ

ธ ƥ ｘ फ

ƥ फ

ƥ ″ फ

ｘ ㅡ ㈠ ธ ㄦ㈠ ธ ｘ ″






╗ γ

Ŵ к ħ ₡ Ŵ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ

ｘ ՙ ՙ ՙ Û

㈠ ╗ ʉ Ŵ

ħ A

㈠ Ɔ

ħ

ㄦ

Ձ Ŵ

Ћ

Ŵ ⓒ

Ќ Ћ ฎ ɱ ㄦ

ՙ ｘ ธ

㈠ ɱ ㅡ ՙ

㈠ ธ ｘｘｘ

╗

Ḛ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ ⓒ

● ㌱㈠

A ผ ㌱ γ ħ


ธ

ㄦㄦㄦ Û

İ ⑾ ⑾ ผ ਙ

Ա кٹ ₡

㈠ ⓒ

Ɔ

ħ

ｘｘ

Ձ ਙ

A

к ⓒ

A

ɱ ｘｘ ″ ″

ｘ㈠

ɱ ㅡ

㈠ ธ ″ ธ

㌱

ਙ こ

A Ɔ Ɔ ● Ɔ ╗ ǲ

Ｃ Ձ ● Ћ ● Ќ Ḛ

Ⓢ Ќ ● ╗ О Ձ A Ќ Ɔ

О ｘｘ ՙ

ธ

ㅡ

ฎ

ں

゜ ㅡ फ ए

ƥ ｘ फ

㌀

ｘ Ṳ

ㅡ ธ

Ա Ⓢ ● Ձ

Ｃ

● Ќ Ḛ

Ա

A Ɔ Ɔ ● Ɔ ╗ ǲ

Ｃ Ձ ● Ћ ● Ќ Ḛ

A Ќ

Ｃ Ҝ ǲ Ҝ Ḷ

Ő A Ő ǲ


ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ ″


S C D

6 4 4 7 1



к

к

к

к

к

к


Ɔ ╗ Ⓢ Ｃ ● Ḷ A

ㅡ ՙ

Ɔ


ธ Ա ǲ Ｃ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ A

″ ㅡ ″ Ɔ

Ҝ ǲ Ҝ Ḷ

Ő A Ő ǲ

ธ Ա ǲ Ｃ

Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ Ա

″ ՙ ㅡ Ɔ

Ҝ ǲ Ҝ Ḷ

Ő A Ő ǲ

Ɔ ╗ Ⓢ Ｃ

● Ḷ Ա

″ ฎ Ɔ

ɱ ƥ ｘ

फ

ธ ㅡ ƥ ｘ फ

ㄦ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ㄦ ƥ ″ फ

ธ ㄦ ƥ ｘ फ

ՙ ƥ ″ फ

ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ฎ ƥ ″ फ

ธ ฎ ƥ ″ फ

ธ ㅡ ƥ ｘ फ

″ ƥ ″ फ ″ ƥ ″ फ

ｘ ㅡ

㈠ ธ ㄦ

㈠ ธ ｘ

″





╗ Ḛ ธ

ｘ

ㄦ

ｘｘ ㅡ

╗ γ

Ŵ к ħ ₡ Ŵ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ

ｘ ՙ ՙ ՙ Û

㈠ ╗ ʉ Ŵ

ħ A

㈠ Ɔ

ħ

ㄦ

Ձ Ŵ

Ћ

Ŵ ⓒ

Ќ Ћ ฎ ɱ ㄦ

ՙ ｘ ธ

㈠ ɱ ㅡ ՙ

㈠ ธ ｘｘｘ

╗

Ḛ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ ⓒ

● ㌱㈠

A ผ ㌱ γ ħ


ธ

ㄦㄦㄦ Û

İ ⑾ ⑾ ผ ਙ

Ա кٹ ₡

㈠ ⓒ

Ɔ

ħ

ｘｘ

Ձ ਙ

A

к ⓒ

A

ɱ ｘｘ ″ ″

ｘ㈠

ɱ ㅡ

㈠ ธ ″ ธ

㌱

ਙ こ

Ҝ ǲ Ҝ Ḷ Ő A Ő ǲ Ⓢ Ќ ● ╗ О Ձ A Ќ Ɔ

О

ｘｘ ฎ

ธ

ㅡ

ฎ

ں

゜ ㅡ फ ए

ƥ ｘ फ

㌀

ｘ Ṳ

ㅡ ธ

Ա Ⓢ ● Ձ Ｃ

● Ќ Ḛ Ա

A Ɔ Ɔ ● Ɔ ╗ ǲ Ｃ Ձ ● Ћ ● Ќ Ḛ


Ő A Ő ǲ


ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ ″


S C D

6 4 4 7 1



ｘ ㅡ ㈠ ธ ㄦ㈠ ธ ｘ

″


Ќ Ћ


Ћ ● Ձ Ձ A Ḛ ǲ

ฎ


╗ Ḛ ธ

ｘ

ㄦｘｘ ㅡ

╗ γ

Ŵ к ħ ₡ Ŵ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ

ｘ ՙ ՙ ՙ Û ㈠

╗ ʉ Ŵ ħ A

㈠ Ɔ ħ

ㄦ

Ձ Ŵ Ћ

ف

Ŵ ⓒ

Ќ Ћ ฎ ɱ ㄦ

ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ ɱ

ㅡ ՙ ㈠ ธ

ｘｘｘ

╗

Ḛ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ ⓒ

● ㌱㈠

A ผ ㌱ γ ħ

㌱ ผ

ો О к Ŵ ħ

ธ

ㄦㄦㄦ Û

İ ⑾ ⑾ ผ ਙ Ա к ₡ ㈠ ⓒ

Ɔ ħ

ｘｘ

Ձ ਙ

A

к ⓒ

A

ɱ ｘｘ

″ ″

ｘ㈠

ɱ ㅡ ㈠ ธ

″ ธ

㌱

ਙ こ

Ҝ A ╗ ǲ Ő ● A Ձ Ա Ḷ A Ő Ｃ

Ҝ Ա

ｘ

Ա Ⓢ ● Ձ Ｃ

● Ќ Ḛ

A

Ɔ О ǲ ● A Ձ A Ő ǲ A ● Ձ ● ╗

ｘｘ

к к к к к к к к к

ⓒ ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ ″


S C D

6 4 4 7 1



ｘ ㅡ ㈠ ธ ㄦ㈠ ธ ｘ ″


Ќ Ћ



╗ Ḛ

ธ ｘㄦｘｘ ㅡ

╗ γ

Ŵ к ħ ₡ Ŵ Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ

ｘ ՙ ՙ ՙ Û ㈠

╗ ʉ Ŵ ħ A

㈠ Ɔ ħ

ㄦ

Ձ Ŵ Ћ

ف

Ŵ ⓒ

Ќ Ћ ฎ ɱ ㄦ

ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ ɱ

ㅡ ՙ ㈠ ธ

ｘｘｘ

╗ Ḛ

Ḛ ผ ਙ ऑ ⓒ

● ㌱㈠

A ผ ㌱ γ ħ

㌱ ผ

ો О к Ŵ ħ

ธ

ㄦㄦㄦ Û

İ ⑾ ⑾ ผ ਙ Ա к ₡ ㈠ ⓒ

Ɔ ħ

ｘｘ

Ձ ਙ

A

к ⓒ

A

ɱ ｘｘ ″ ″

ｘ㈠

ɱ ㅡ ㈠ ธ

″ ธ

㌱ ਙ こ

Ҝ A ╗ ǲ Ő ● A Ձ Ա Ḷ A Ő Ｃ

Ҝ Ա ธ ｘ

Ա Ⓢ ● Ձ Ｃ

● Ќ Ḛ Ա

A Ɔ Ɔ ● Ɔ ╗ ǲ Ｃ Ձ ● Ћ ● Ќ Ḛ A Ќ Ｃ Ҝ ǲ Ҝ Ḷ

Ő

A Ő ǲ

ｘｘ ธ

к к к к к к к к к ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ ″


S C D - 6 4 4 7 1





S C D -

6 4 4 7 1

[ P R J - 6 4

2 3 0 ]

-

M A J O R

D E V I A T I O N

-

S U M M E R L I N

D E V E L O P M E N

T

S T A N D A R D S

-

A P P L I C A N T : C A L I D A

R E S I D E N T I A L ,

L L C -

O W N E R : H

I N E S I N T E R E S T S L P ,

E T A L

N O R T H C O R N E R O F D

E S E R T C R O S S I N G C O U R T A N D

C E N T E R C R O S S I N G R O A D

0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6



S C D -

6 4 4 7 1

[ P R J - 6 4

2 3 0 ]

-

M A J O R

D E V I A T I O N

-

S U M M E R L I N

D E V E L O P M E N

T

S T A N D A R D S

-



L L C -

O W N E R : H


E T A L




0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6



S C D -

6 4 4 7 1

[ P R J - 6 4

2 3 0 ]

-

M A J O R

D E V I A T I O N

-

S U M M E R L I N

D E V E L O P M E N

T

S T A N D A R D S

-



L L C -

O W N E R : H


E T A L




0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6



ｘㄦ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธｘ

SCD-64471 - REVISED



ｘㄦ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธｘ

SCD-64471 - REVISED









ｘㄦ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธｘ

SCD-64471 - REVISED



ｘㄦ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธｘ

SCD-64471 - REVISED



ｘㄦ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธｘ

SCD-64471 - REVISED



ｘㄦ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธｘ

SCD-64471 - REVISED



Aऑผħк ธՙⓒ ธｘ

″

╗γਙこŴ İผ⇡ŴкŴ

╗γ

Ŵкħ₡Ŵ Ḛผਙऑ

ｘՙՙՙ Û㈠ ╗ʉŴħⓒ Ɔħש ㄦ

ՁŴ Ћ فŴⓒ ЌЋ ฎɱ ㄦ

Ő ƆЌŐＣŐ ผਙħ Ŵผ Ŵこऑ Ｃ

ผש

ผਙħف

ਙผש

ש

ผ ผਙħف

ŐਙŴ₡ⓒ Ɔここ

ผкħ

ЋħккŴف ฎ ӧ╗γ ผਙħفỏ

Ｃ

Ŵผ Ҝผ㈠ İผ⇡ŴкŴⓒ

╗γ Ɔここ ผкħ Ќਙ Ő ħ₡ שħŴк Ｃ ħف Ő ٹħ ʉ ਙここħשש ӧƆЌŐＣŐỏ γŴ ผ ٹħ ʉ ₡ γש ㌱γ こŴשħ㌱ ₡ ħف

㌱ਙ㌱

ऑש

⑾ਙผש

γ

ผਙħف

Ŵผ

Ŵこऑ ħ ╗γ

ผਙħف

ЋħккŴف

Ŵש

Ɔここ

ผкħ㈠ ╗γ

㌱ਙここħשש

γŴ

Ŵऑऑผਙٹ

₡ש

γ

ผਙħف

Ŵผ

Ŵこऑ

⑾ਙผש

γ

ऑŴผ㌱

к㈠ ╗γ

ŴŴкħ ऑผਙٹ

ħ₡

₡ ⇡ Ձਙ㌱γŴ ǲف

ħ

ผħف

ผف

Ŵผ₡ħف

ש

γ

ผ׀

ש

₡ ऑŴผħف

ʉŴħٹ

ผ ħ Ŵ㌱㌱

ऑש

Ŵ⇡к ש

ਙש

γħ ㌱ਙここħשש

㈠

Ок Ŵ Ŵ₡₡ผ γש ㌱ਙ₡ħשħਙ ਙשкħ ₡ ħ ਙผ ㌱γ こŴשħ㌱ ₡ ħف ผ ٹħ ʉ к שש ผ ħ ਙผ Оผ кħこħŴผ Ｃ ħف

Ő ٹħ ʉ ⇡こħששŴк㈠

Őف

Ŵผ₡ⓒ

Aผש

γผ ǲккħਙשש

ⓒ A●A

ƆＣŐ ਙкשħف Aผ㌱γħש ㌱ש

ｘㅡ゜ธฎ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธｘ

SCD-64471








SUBJECT:SUP-64268 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: THE BUTCHER

BLOCK - OWNER: MONACO PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a

Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED BEER/WINE/COOLER ON AND OFF-SALEESTABLISHMENT USE WITHIN AN EXISTING 3,241 SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT

AND GENERAL RETAIL STORE at 6440 North Durango Drive, Suite #125 (APN 125-20-

801-002), T-C (Town Center) Zone [SC (Service Commercial - Town Center) Town Center

Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64241]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.






RECOMMENDATION:



1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps2. Conditions and Staff Report3. Supporting Documentation

4. Photo(s)










SUP-64268 [PRJ-64241]

RG




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: THE BUTCHER BLOCK - OWNER: MONACO

PROPERTIES, LLC


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

SUP-64268 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: N/A

** NOTIFICATION **


NOTICES MAILED 196

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



SUP-64268 [PRJ-64241]

RG

Conditions Page One


** CONDITIONS **

SUP-64268 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for aBeer/Wine/Cooler On and Off-Sale Establishment use.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless exercised

pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time may be filed forconsideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be completed incompliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department of Building and

Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set submitted

for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license application.

5. Minors shall only be permitted in such areas wherein spirituous, malt or fermented liquors

or wines are served only in conjunction with regular meals and where dining tables or booths are provided separate from the bar in conformance with Title 6.50.

6. Approval of this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval of a liquor license.

7. This business shall operate in conformance to Chapter 6.50 of the City of Las VegasMunicipal Code.

8. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be satisfied,

except as modified herein.



SUP-64268 [PRJ-64241]

RG



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The is a request for a Special Use Permit to allow a Beer/Wine/Cooler On and Off-Sale use

within an existing 3,241 square-foot Restaurant and General Retail Store located at 6440 North

Durango Drive, Suite #125.

ISSUES

A Beer/Wine/Cooler On and Off-Sale use is permitted in the SC-TC (Service Commercial – Town Center) Town Center Special Land Use Designation with a Special Use Permit.

ANALYSIS

This is a request for a Special Use Permit for Beer/Wine/Cooler On and Off-Sale Establishmentuse. The subject suite is currently operating as a Restaurant and a General Retail Store. The

subject property is within the SC-TC (Service Commercial – Town Center) Special Land Use

Designation and the proposed use is permitted with an approved Special Use Permit. There are

no protected uses within 400 feet of the subject property. The subject property is within the 500

feet of the jurisdictional boundary of Clark County and a Project of Regional Significance wassubmitted. There is no response from the affected agency regarding the proposed use.

The Beer/Wine/Cooler On and Off-Sale use is defined as “An establishment: 1. Whose license

to sell alcoholic beverages is limited to: a. The sale of beer, wine and coolers for consumption in

connection with a meal on the premises where the business is conducted; and b. The sale of

beer, wine and coolers to consumers only and not for resale, in original sealed or corkedcontainers, for consumption off the premises where the business is conducted; and 2. Is operated

in connection with a restaurant, general grocery store, general retail store or convenience store in

which 30 or more people may be served with meals at any one time at tables or stools.” The

proposed use meets the definition it will be located in an existing Restaurant without drive

through and General Retail Store.

The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use include:

1. Except as otherwise provided, no Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment (hereinafter

“establishment”) shall be located within 400 feet of any Church/House of Worship,

School, Individual Care Center licensed for more than 12 children, or City Park.



SUP-64268 [PRJ-64241]

RG



There are no Churches/Houses of Worship, School, Individual Care Centers licensed for

more than 12 children or City Parks within 400 feet of the subject site.

*2. Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances referred to in

Requirement 1 shall be determined with reference to the shortest distance between two

property lines, one being the property line of the proposed establishment which is closest

to the existing use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the property

line of that existing use which is closest to the proposed establishment. The distance

shall be measured in a straight line without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes

of measurement, the term “property line” refers to property lines of fee interest parcels

and does not include the property line of:

a. Any leasehold parcel; or b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area for on site

parking and which has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation

described in Requirement 1.



*3. In the case of an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel of at least 80 acres in

size, the minimum distances referred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured in a straight

line:

a. From the nearest property line of the existing use to the nearest portion of the

structure in which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening

obstacles; or

b. In the case of a proposed establishment which will be located within a shopping

center or other multiple tenant structure, from the nearest property line of the

existing use to the nearest property line of a leasehold or occupancy parcel in

which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening obstacles.

Not applicable, the subject site is not located on a parcel of at least 80 acres of size, the

Clark County Assessor’s Office l ist the subject property at 3.5 acres.

4. When considering a Special Use Permit application for an establishment which also

requires a waiver of the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning Commission

shall take into consideration the distance policy and shall, as part of its recommendation

to the City Council, state whether the distance requirement should be waived and the

reasons in support of the decision.



SUP-64268 [PRJ-64241]

RG





5. The minimum distance requirements in Requirement 1 do not apply to:

a. An establishment which has a nonrestricted gaming license in connection with a

hotel having 200 or more guest rooms on or before July 1, 1992 or in connection

with a resort hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms after July 1, 1992; or

b. A proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square feet of retail floor

space.

This condition is not applicable as the subject site is not located within an establishment

which has a non-restricted gaming license in connection with a hotel having 200 or more

guest rooms.

*6. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conform to the provisions of LVMC

Chapter 6.50

The proposed use will be subject to all business licensing requirements outlined in LVMC

Chapter 6.50 if approved.

7. The minimum distance requirements set forth in Requirement 1, which are otherwise

nonwaivable under the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C), may be waived:

a.

In accordance with the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C) for any establishment

which is proposed to be located on a parcel within the Downtown Casino Overlay

District;

b. In accordance with the applicable provisions of the “Town Center Development

Standards Manual” for any establishment which is proposed to be located within

the T-C (Town Center) Zoning District and which is designated MS-TC (Main

Street Mixed Use) in the Town Center Land Use Plan;

c. In connection with a proposed establishment having between 20,000 square feet

and 50,000 square feet of retail floor space, if no more than 10 percent of the

retail floor space is regularly devoted to the display or merchandising of alcoholic beverages; or

d. In connection with a retail establishment having less than 20,000 square feet of

retail floor space, if the area to be used for the sale, display or merchandising of

alcoholic beverages and each use to be protected are separated by a highway or a

right of way with a width of at least 100 feet.



SUP-64268 [PRJ-64241]

RG



There are no Church/Houses of Worship, School, Individual Care Center licensed for


8. Except for a grocery store or drugstore as defined by LVMC 6.50.020 that contains not

less than twelve thousand square feet of gross internal floor area, no establishment shall

be permitted on or adjacent to the Pedestrian Mall, as defined in LVMC Chapter 11.68.

This requirement does not apply as the site is not adjacent to the Pedestrian Mall.

The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On and Off-Sale Establishment use will be located within theexisting Shopping Center. The proposed use will be located within an existing Restaurant

without drive through and General Retail Store. The proposed use can be conducted in a manner

that is harmonious and compatible with existing surrounding uses as the property is situatedwithin a Shopping Center; therefore, staff recommends approval. If this request is denied, the proposed use cannot be conducted on site.

FINDINGS (SUP-64268)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning

Commission and City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and

compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding landuses as projected by the General Plan.

The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On and Off-Sale use will be ancillary to the existing

Restaurant without drive through and General Retail Store use at the subject site. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses and can be conducted in a

manner that is harmonious with surrounding land uses.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.

The subject site is an established Shopping Center; therefore, the site is physically suitable

for the type and intensity of the proposed land use.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in

size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

Site access is provided from Durango Drive, a 120-foot Town Center Parkway Arterial

and Centennial Parkway, a 90-foot Town Center Frontage Road. Both roadways are ofsufficient size to accommodate the needs of the proposed Massage Establishment use

located within an existing Shopping Center.





SUP-64268 [PRJ-64241]

RG




02/07/07

The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan Review

(SDR-17735) for a 42,790 square-foot retail shopping center with Waivers ofthe Build-to-Line requirement and to allow 15 feet of Perimeter LandscapeBuffer adjacent to a Drive-Through Aisle where 25 feet is required at the

northeast corner of West Centennial Parkway and North Durango Drive. The

Planning Commission recommended approval.

07/16/08

The City Council approved a requests for Special Use Permit (SUP-27947)for a Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment within a proposed

Convenience Store; and a Special Use Permit (SUP-27945) for a Gaming

Establishment, Restricted License use within a proposed Convenience Store

with a Waiver to allow a distance separation of 115 feet from a single-familydwelling where 330 feet is required at 6410 North Durango Drive, Suite #105.

The Planning Commission recommended approval.

11/03/15

The Planning Commission approved a request for Special Use Permit (SUP-

61031) for a restaurant with drive-through use at 6408-6446 North DurangoDrive. Staff recommended approval.

The Planning Commission approved a request for a Site Development Plan

Review (SDR-61034) for major amendment to a previously approved Site

Development Plan Review (SDR-17735) for a 2,795 square-foot expansion to

an approved 45,447 square-foot shopping center at 6408-6446 North DurangoDrive. Staff recommended approval.




02/22/09A building permit (#7002767) was issued for a building shell at 6440 North

Durango Drive. The permit was finalized on 04/10/09.

02/15/12A building permit (#203451) was issued for a 1,400 square-foot Restaurant at6440 North Durango Drive, Suite #126. The permit was finalized on

04/09/13

10/26/15 A building permit (#271010) was issued for a tenant improvement for aRestaurant 1,051 square-foot expansion to the adjacent suite at 6440 North

Durango Drive, Suite #125. The permit was finalized on 03/15/16.

03/26/13A business license (F50-00421) was issued for a Butcher Shop at 6440 NorthDurango Drive, Suite #125. The license is active.

03/30/16A business license (G64-01873) was issued for a Restaurant at 6440 Durango

Drive, Suite #125. The license is active.





SUP-64268 [PRJ-64241]

RG

Staff Report Page Eight



03/26/13

A business license (F50-00421) was issued for a Butcher Shop at 6440 North

Durango Drive, Suite #125. The license is active.

03/30/16A business license (G64-01873) was issued for a Restaurant at 6440 Durango

Drive, Suite #125. The license is active.


Town Center Master Plan Y


T-C (Town Center) District Y


Trails N/ALas Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A

Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification Assessment) Y



Street Name Functional

Classif ication of

Street(s)

Govern ing Document Actual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliance

with Street

Section

Durango Drive Town CenterParkway Arterial

Town CenterDevelopment Standards

Manual

120 Y

Centennial Parkway Frontage Loop Town Center

Development Standards

Manual

90 Y



Use

Gross F loor

Area orNumber of

Units


Parking

Ratio

Parking Parking

RegularHandi-

cappedRegular

Handi-

capped

Shopping

Center48,242 SF 1:250 SF 193





ｘㄦ゜ｘ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธㅡ

SUP-64268







ｘㄦ゜ ธ ゜ ″

О Ő İ ″ ㅡ ธ ㅡ



ｘㄦ゜ｘ゜ ″

О Ő İ ″ ㅡ ธ ㅡ

S U P 6 4 2 6 8





╗AՁḶŐ ḶƆⓈՁ╗●Ḛ ḚŐḶⓈОⓒ ՁՁḚਙ

ผこ

ש

A⑾⑾Ŵħผ ՁŴ₡ Ⓢ

ਙкש

Ŵש

Ձħ׀ਙผ ḚŴこħف Ձħ㌱ ħف

О㈠Ḷ㈠ Աਙゥㄦｘㄦธ ՁŴ Ћ فŴⓒ ЌЋ ฎɱ ″ Оγਙ ՙｘธ㈠ธฎｘ㈠″ ՙㄦʉʉʉ㈠שγ שŴкਙผ㌱ਙкשħففผਙऑ㈠㌱ਙこ

ҜŴผ㌱γ ธㅡⓒ ธｘ ″

ħ ਙ⑾ ՁŴ Ћف Ŵ ОкŴħف ＣऑŴผ こ Ќ㈠ ŐŴ㌱γਙՁŴ Ћف Ŵⓒ Ќٹ Ŵ₡Ŵ ฎɱ ｘ″

Ő Ɔऑ ㌱ħŴк Ⓢ Оผこħ

╗γ Ա ㌱γ ผ Աкਙ㌱

╗ਙ Ûγਙこ ●

ҜŴ ਙ㌱ ผ

╗γ Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħ ผ׀ ħف Ŵ ऑ㌱ħŴк ऑผこħ ਙ Ŵккਙʉ ⑾ਙผ γ ਙŴк Ŵ₡ ਙ⑾⑾Ŵк ਙ⑾ ⇡ ผ゜ʉħ Ŵ γħ Ա ㌱γ ผ Ɔγਙऑ Ŵ⇡кħγこ㈠ ╗γ ⇡ħ ħ кਙ㌱Ŵ

₡ Ŵ ″ㅡㅡｘ Ќ㈠ＣผŴفਙⓒ Ɔħ

ธㄦⓒ ՁЋⓒ ЌЋ ฎɱ ㅡɱ㈠ ╗γ Ա ㌱γ ผ Ɔγਙऑ Ŵкਙ γŴ Ŵ ผ ŴผŴ Ŵ ऑŴผ ਙ⑾γ ⇡ħ ਙऑ ผŴ ħਙ⊿ ʉγ ผ ऑŴ ผਙ ㌱Ŵ ऑผ㌱γŴ Ŵ Ŵк㌱ਙγਙкħ㌱ ⇡ٹ ผŴف ħ ㌱ਙ㈾㌱ ħਙ

ʉħ γ γ ħผ こ Ŵк㈠

╗γ ⇡ħ ħ кਙ㌱Ŵ

₡ ħ Ŵ ผ Ŵħк γਙऑऑħف ㌱

ผ Ŵ γ ㌱ਙผผ ਙ⑾ Ќ㈠ＣผŴفਙ Ŵ₡

ħŴк Ｃผħٹ ㈠ ╗γħ ऑผਙ㈾㌱ γŴ Ŵ₡׀ Ŵ

ऑŴผħف Ŵ₡ ผŴ⑾⑾ħ㌱ Ŵ㌱㌱ħ⇡ħкħ ㈠ ● ਙ ʉŴ₡ਙ γħ ऑผਙ㈾㌱㌱ਙこऑผਙこħ γ ऑ⇡кħ㌱ γŴк γⓒ Ŵ⑾ ⓒ Ŵ₡ ʉ к⑾Ŵผ ਙ⑾ γ ਙ⇡㈾㌱ ħٹ ਙ⑾γ Ḛ ผŴк ОкŴ㈠

● ऑħف ʉħ γ γ ਙŴк ਙ⑾ ╗ħ кف ɱ㈠ธｘⓒ ਙผ ऑผਙ㈾㌱こ゜ऑऑਙผ γ ħ ħ ผف кŴ ħਙ Ŵ ħ ऑ ผ Ŵħ ਙ ₡ٹ кਙऑこ㌱ਙこऑŴ ħ⇡ħкħ ㈠ ╗γ Ա ㌱γ ผ Աкਙ㌱ γŴ ⇡ Ŵ

ʉ к㌱ਙこ ₡ Ŵ₡₡ħ ħਙ ਙ

ħŴк Ġħкк Ŵผ Ŵⓒ Ŵ₡ ʉħкк ผٹ Ŵ Ŵਙ γ ผ Ŵٹ ⑾ਙผγਙऑऑ ผⓒ ħفγ⇡ਙผħف ผħ₡ ⓒ Ŵ₡ こऑкਙ ਙ⑾ γ ㌱

ผ ਙ ㈾ਙفผ Ŵ ⑾ਙਙ₡ⓒ ʉħ ⓒŴ₡ γਙऑħ Ŵкħ ㈠ Û ผऑ ㌱ ⑾кк ผ׀ γŴ ħ Ɔ Ŵ⑾⑾ Ŵ₡ ОкŴħف ਙここħħਙŴऑऑผਙٹ ਙผ ผ׀ ⑾ਙผ γħ ऑ ㌱ħŴк ऑผこħ ㈠

Ő ऑ ㌱ ⑾кк ⓒ

ЌŴ

γŴħ

к ╗Ŵ кਙผ

ЌŴ γŴħ к ╗Ŵ кਙผОผ ħ₡

″ ՙㄦｘㄦ゜ｘ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธㅡ

SUP-64268








SUBJECT:SUP-64491 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: GLEN RUBIN -

OWNER: DOUGLAS B. KAYS, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Special Use

Permit FOR A PROPOSED 9,450 SQUARE-FOOT MOTORCYCLE/MOTOR SCOOTERSALES USE WITHIN AN EXISTING SWAP MEET at 1717 South Decatur Boulevard (APN

162-06-301-002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-64362]. Staff


MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON









6. Support Postcard







SUP-64491 [PRJ-64362]

RG




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: GLEN RUBIN - OWNER: DOUGLAS B. KAYS,

ET AL


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

SUP-64491 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: N/A

** NOTIFICATION **


NOTICES MAILED 485

APPROVALS 1

PROTESTS 0





SUP-64491 [PRJ-64362]

RG



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a Special Use Permit for a proposed 9,450 square-foot Motor Scooter Salesuse within an existing Swap Meet use. This is a C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoned property

located at 1717 South Decatur Boulevard.

ISSUES

A Motor Scooter Sales use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district with

the approval of a Special Use Permit. Staff supports the request.

ANALYSIS

The existing Swap Meet use has been licensed since 11/21/1991 at 1717 South Decatur

Boulevard and is a legal non-conforming use per Title 19.16, as this use began operating prior tothe requirement for a Special Use Permit. The proposed 9,450 square-foot Motorcycle/Motor

Scooter Sales use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district with an approval

of a Special Use Permit. The proposed use consists of a showroom and an inventory

storage/service area located within the Swap Meet and no Waivers of the minimum Special Use

Permit requirements are part of this application; therefore, the proposed use meets the minimumSpecial Use Permit requirements of Title 19.12.

The Motorcycle/Motor Scooter Sales use is defined as “A facility or area for the display and sale

of motorcycles and motor scooters, whether new or used, but excluding mopeds. This use

includes service bays which are incidental and accessory to the sales use. The term

“motorcycle/motor scooter sales” is used for the sole purpose of all owing the use by means ofSpecial Use Permit in the C-1 District. For all other purposes, the use described here shall be

treated under the appropriate category of motor vehicle sales.” The proposed use meets the

definition as the applicant’s justification letter date stamped 05/02/16, states the applicant intends

to sell electric and gas powered scooters. The subject property is in the C-1 District and the

Motorcycle/Motor Scooter Sales use is allowed with an approved Special Use Permit.


1. All display and sales shall take place in an enclosed building.

The proposed use meets this requirement as the showroom and inventory storage will be

inside the Swap Meet.



SUP-64491 [PRJ-64362]

RG



2. The minimum gross floor area of the building (or tenant space) that is dedicated to this

use shall be 7000 square feet.

The proposed use meets this requirement as the submitted floor plan, date stamped on

05/02/16 contains 3,000 square-foot of showroom space and the submitted floor plan,

date stamped 05/12/16 contains 6,450 square feet of inventory/service area.

The property is surrounded by commercial uses and the proposed use can be conducted in a

manner that is harmonious and compatible with existing surrounding land uses; therefore, staff

recommends approval of this request. If this request is denied, the proposed use will not be permitted.


In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the PlanningCommission and City Council must affirm the following:


compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land

uses as projected by the General Plan.

The proposed 9,450 square-foot Motorcycle/Motor Scooter Sales use will be locatedwithin the interior of the building which contains a Swap Meet use; therefore, the proposed

use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with existing

surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land uses as projected by the General

Plan.


There are no proposed changes for the existing structure housing the Swap Meet use; the

proposed Motorcycle/Motor Scooter Sales use will be located within the interior of the

building as part of the Swap Meet use.



Access to the site is provided by Decatur Boulevard, a 100-foot Primary Arterial, and

Oakey Boulevard, an 80-foot Major Collector. These streets provide adequate traffic flow

for the proposed Motorcycle/Motor Scooter Sales use.



SUP-64491 [PRJ-64362]

RG



4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with

or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of theGeneral Plan.

Approval of the Special Use Permit for a Motorcycle/Motor Scooter Sales use at thislocation will not compromise the public health, safety and welfare or the primary

objectives of the General Plan, as the use will be subject to regular inspections and

licensing requirements.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The proposed use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.



12/06/67

The Board of Zoning Adjustment approved a Rezoning (Z-0018-67) from R-1

(Single Family Residential and R-3 (Medium Density Residential) to C-1

(Limited Commercial) for a Shopping Center at 1717 South Decatur

Boulevard.


11/21/91A business license (#G50-05312) was issued for an Indoor Swap Meet at1717 South Decatur Boulevard. This license is still active.




04/11/16

A pre-application meeting with the applicant took place. The issue of the proposed Motorcycle/Motor Scooter Sales use floor plan shall demonstratethat the use will meet Title 19.12 minimum Special Use Permit requirements

number 1 “The minimum gross floor area of the building (or tenant space)

that is dedicated to this use shall be 7,000 square feet.” If the floor plancannot meet that condition, a Waiver of the minimum Special Use

Requirement will be part of the application. Per Fire Department staff, the

proposed use within the Swap Meet must meet Fire and Building Codes.





SUP-64491 [PRJ-64362]

RG




A-O (Airport Overlay) District (200 feet) Y

Other Plans or Special Requi rements Compliance Trails N/A





Street Name

Functional

Classif ication of

Street(s)

Govern ing Document

Actual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliance

with Street

Section

Decatur Boulevard Primary ArterialPlanned Streets and

Highways100 Y

Oakey Boulevard Major CollectorPlanned Streets and

Highways80 Y

Pursuant to Ti tle 19.12, the fol lowing parking standards apply:


Use

Gross F loor

Area orNumber of

Units


Parking

Ratio Parking Parking

RegularHandi-

cappedRegular

Handi-

capped

Swap Meet25,000 SF

1/175 SF

for thefirst

25,000 SF

143

109,881 SF 1/250 SF 440

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 583 1,252 Y

Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 571 12 1,229 23 Y



㌱

кƥこ ⇡㌱ผฌ

Ɔ╗A╗ǲҜ ǲЌ╗

Ḷ

●Ќ AЌ ●AՁ

●Ќ ╗ǲŐ ǲƆ ╗ฌ

㏂ОЌ ⓒⓒฌ

″

ՙ

ｘ″

ｘ゜

ਙ ฌ

Ќ ผ㌱

ਙ⑾Оผਙऑ㌱ผ

ผफผƥف

⒕ਙ

⑾

ਙ

ՙ

ⓒฌ

кⓒ׀゜

₡ ਙ ฌ

Ɔ⇡㌱ผħ⇡ ₡

₡

ผٹਙผ

⇡㌱⑾⇡ผ

こ ฌ

γħ

ⓒ﹒

ਙ⒕ƥ

ਙผ

⟨ ⑾ฎ⁸

㈠▷ਙ

″ฌ

Ќ ผผผ㌱

ਙ⑾

Aऑऑкħ㌱ ฌ

ǲ㏂ ⓒ

ฌ

ՁผⓈ ฌ

Ќ こ㌱

ਙ⑾● ㌱ऑผ ㌱ ħٹ ฌ

ƥкƥਙ

γ

⇡㌱

ਙںƥ ਙผ

ਙผٹк㌱₡ف ㈠

₡ਙ㌱

γ㌱

Ҝ ਙผ

ਙผ

ผ ผผ⇡㌱ผਙ⑾ γ㌱ ħ ਙ㌱ħкਙผฌ

Ок ħف

ਙこ ħħਙผ

γ ㌱ٹ

⑾ħ ㌱ħ к

ħ ผ㌱

ħ γħ

ਙผ

ਙ γ ผ

ऑผਙऑ ผ

ผٹħ γ

γ ฌ

ऑผਙऑ㌱ผ

ਙ⇓⇓㌱ผ㈠

ऑऑкħ㌱㈠

γ

ऑผਙऑ ผ

ਙкٹ ผ

ਙк

ऑऑкħ㌱ ƥ

ف ผ к

ਙผ

кħผħ ₡

ऑ ผ ผ㈠

ਙผฌ

ਙ⑾кħ㌱㌱ผ

ਙ⑾ γ ħผ

㌱ਙผऑਙผ ħਙ

ਙผкħこ ħ ₡кħ ⇡ħкħ

㌱ਙこ ऑ ﹒ฌ

●

ฌ

Ṳ㏂ฌ

●⑾

ƥ㌱㈠ں

ऑк㌱ƥ

ħผผ₡ħ㌱㌱

γ㌱

こ㌱こ ⇡ ผ

ਙ⑾

γ㌱

ħ ਙ㌱ħкਙผ

Ок ħف ਙこ ผħħਙ

ⓒγਙħฌ

ħٹਙкٹ ₡

₡

кħ

γ こ㌱ӧỏ

ਙ⑾ƥ γ㌱

ऑ㌱ผਙ

ਙผ

ऑ ผਙ

ผٹħ γ

ผٹγਙこ γ

ħ

Ḷ ⑾⑾ħ㌱ħ кγਙк₡ฌ

ħк ㌱ ƥ㌱к㈠

Aкਙ

кħ

γ

A㌱ਙผफ

О ผ㌱㌱кЌ こ ⇡ ผ

ħ⑾

γ

ऑผਙऑ ผ ⓒħผٹγħ㌱γ

γ㌱ħ ผ

ħฌ

γ㌱к₡

ħ

₡ħк⑾㌱к

⑾ħਙผ

γ

㌱㌱

ऑ ผ㌱ к㈠ฌ

ħผ Ḷ ⑾кħ㌱ħ кฌ

О ผк㌱ผӧỏ

ฌ

AО Ќฌ

ħف ผ

ਙबƥ ỏผਙऑ ผ

ਙผٹ㌱ผ

ธ

㈠

ƥ ㅡ ฌ

ऑผħผ Ќ ผผฌ

﹒ⓒฌں

ⓒफฌ

ƥ

ⓒԱ

кħƥкผкⓒฌ

Ќ ਙ ผ

кỏ⇡кħ㌱

ħ

₡

кਙผ

ħ₡

ਙ

₡

Ɔ ฌ

●к㌱ ħ⊿₡

●ħ к㈠к ｘｘ

кƥ

⇓㌱㈠ħ㌱ऑਙ ⇓ผ⇓ऑऑкผ㌱ผ ħਙ

О㈠ħ㌱㌱к⇓Ɔ ㌱ ਙ⑾

●㈾ħ㌱ħ к

● ㌱ผ㌱

İħฌ

ｘㄦ゜ｘธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡ″ธ

SUP-64491



AО●ƥՁ● Aƥ╗●Ḷ Ќ

О●২●ƥ●╗●Ḷ Ќ

Ḷ ╗╗Ќ ⓒ●ฌ

Aऑऑкħ㌱ ħਙ ●ⓒ ħ ħਙ

ਙผ㈠ฌ

ऑผਙ㈾㌱㌱

A₡ ผ

ӧผⓒਙ㌱ ผħਙ⊿

﹒

﹒﹝ں

⑾㌱ਙ⑾ħ ﹝Աब ㈠

㌀ ોΎ ﹝﹝ฌ

Оผਙħ ㌱㈠ƥⓒⓒⓒผ⟨

Ձਙⓒİ ผ

㌀ ਙ к ﹝ ﹝

●ƥผऑਙ ₡

кผफฌں

ਙ゜ ผผผผħⓒ

A ਙผƥऑħผผ㌱

ӧħ﹝

″ธ﹝ Ḷ Ḛ

ƆA

ਙՁฌ

кЋ ผ₡

ħ

﹝Ɔ﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝ฌ

Ḛ ㌱ผ к

●ƥк

ゥħħħผفฌ

⟨ ऑผਙऑਙ ₡

╗ਙħف

㌱ผħ ħفฌ

ऑผਙऑਙ㌱㌱ผฌ

㌱ਙผ ㌱ผ㌱ħħผк

׀ผผ ผ

ผкਙਙ ف㌱

⟨

ħ

ਙਙ ธ

ǲ﹝﹝﹝кਙਙผ

Aผ㌱ кк ħਙ

﹝

Ձ İ﹝ف

⑾ฌ

㌱ħㅡⓒ

⑾

फผ

ՙ

ฌ

●ħ ผ

ħк

A₡

ผ

Ћ к׀ Ɔ

㌀ ﹝

﹒ ਙՙ

ผӧ ฌ

ՙ ⓒ

ｹ㏂ฌ

⇓ƥ㈠

㈠㈠

㈠⇓

ƥ㈠ƥฌ

●ỏผħผผк

⇓

﹒ਙкผк

फฌ

Ɔ Ձผ⇡㌱ผħ⇡㌱ ħ

ħħผк

ⓒਙผ

⇡ ħħผผ㌱ฌ

к⇓ӧỏħ㈠ผ㈾⇓

кỏħ㈾ккк⊿ผผ

ħ⊿⊿㈠ к

ħħ ผ

⊿㈠ ⓒผฌ

ħ⁸ผⓒħ㈠ⓒ ħ⁸

ħ

ब ﹒ՙⓒħⓒ

㈠ฌ

ħ

Ɔ ผ ㌱ฌ

к

⑾ฌ

●╗

●

О●㈠●Ⓢ Ɔ｜ⓒ

Ќ ╗ƥAƥ●

●Ћ

㈠ⓒ

㈾

बف ⑾

ਙ

ħฌ

A₡₡ผ㌱ฌ

Ок ਙ㌱

кफ ผฌ

ħ ผฌ

Ɔ ㌱ฌ

﹝

Ύħк ฌ

●ħ ผ ħк

A ⊿ผкผ㌱ฌ

ƥⓒ㈠

㈠

㈠㈾㈠㈠㈠

㈠

к ผںⓒ㈠

ⓒ

㈠

㈠㈠ⓒ

㈠ⓒ к

㈠ⓒħ

ผ⊿ ⓒ

⊿ผฌ

ħⓒ㈠ⓒⓒⓒħ㈠

ผ

к㈠ผ

ỏ㈠

㈾

İħ㈠㈠㈠ħħ⁸ں

ħ㈠ผ⇓ħƥ㈠㈠ผк㈠ผ ħ২ ⓒฌ

●кผਙİк ผ кⓒ

Ḷ ⓒ㌱ผںں

Ɔħف

ผ㈠ ƥฌ

㌱

ккฌ

●к ħ●к ㌱ฌ

ƥħ

ħ ㈠İ

ผƥ㈠

㈠ฌ

Ｃ㌱●к㌱㌱ ħٹ㌱ ⁸

ƥՁฌ

●ब ㌱㌱ħٹ ₡Ա ฌ

Û ●ՁՁ●AҜ

╗㈠

A Ｃ A Ҝ Ɔ ฌ

㌱ਙħผħผ㈠

ⓒธںںㅡՙㄦฌ

кผਙ Ő

ОⓈ кк

ผ㌱

㈠ਙA Ⓢ ӧкŐ ● кฌ

ЋǲЌ╗ⓈŐA ḶⓈЌ╗ฌ

ਙここ㈠ǲゥਙ㈠İⓈՁ ｘ㈠ ธｘںɱฌ

ธｘ

кฌ

ｘㄦ゜ｘธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡ″ธ

SUP-64491



ｘㄦ゜ธㄦ゜ ″

ОŐİ ″ㅡ″ธ

S U P 6

4 4 9 1

R E V I S E D



゜

゜

゜

к

к

к

₡

ผ

ब

﹒

ો

ƥ

ผ

⊿

ħ

Ő

ħ

㌱

ٹ

㈠

Ձ

ｹ

फ

⟨

⇓

ƥ

फ

ՙ

⟨

●

●

●

●

Ɔ

⑾

●

●

●

ں

●

●

●

ں

﹝

ㅡ

ƥ

⟨

২

Ձ

ｘ

Őਙ

●

㏂

ӧ

к

॥

●

●

ħ

●

ƥ

⟨

फ

⊿

⊿

⊿

ผ

㏂


О Ő İ ″ ㅡ ″ ธ

S U P

6 4 4 9 1









S U P - 6 4 4 9 1 [ P R J - 6 4 3

6 2 ] - S P E C I A L U S E P E R M I T -

A P P L I C A N T : G L E N

R U B I N

- O W

N E R : D O U G L A S B .

K A Y S , E T A L

1 7 1 7 S O U T H D E C A T U

R B O U L E V A R D

0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6



S U P - 6 4 4 9 1 [ P R J - 6 4 3

6 2 ] - S P E C I A L U S E P E R M I T -

A P P L I C A N T : G L E N

R U B I N

- O W

N E R : D O U G L A S B .

K A Y S , E T A L

1 7 1 7 S O U T H D E C A T U

R B O U L E V A R D

0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6



ħ⑾ħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ

Ձ ผฌ

Ｃ ऑŴผ こ

ਙ⑾

ОкŴħفฌ

ħ

ਙ⑾ՁŴЋ فŴฌ

Ő Ќ Ŵこ

ਙ⑾Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ฌ

Ɔऑ ㌱ħŴк

Ⓢ

ऑ ผこ ħ Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙฌ

Ձՙ●ՙ

Ɔ㈠

Ｃ㌱Ŵ ผ

Աкٹ₡㈠ⓒ

ՁŴЋ فŴⓒ

Ќ ฌ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ

Ќ こ ⇡ ผ

ऑŐ ″ㅡ″ธฌ

Ｃ ऑŴผ こ

ਙ⑾

ОкŴħف⊿ฌ

╗γħ

ħ⑾ħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ

Ձ ผ

ħ

ħ

ऑऑਙผ

ਙ⑾

γ

Ŵ⇡ਙٹ

ผ ⑾ ผ ㌱ ₡

Ɔऑ ㌱ħŴк

Ⓢ

ऑ ผこ ħ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ㈠ฌ

Оผਙħ ㌱

Ｃ㌱ผħऑ ħਙ

╗γħ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ

ħ

ਙ

ਙऑ ผŴ

Ŵ

ผ Ŵħк

γਙʉ ผਙਙこ

ккħف

к ㌱ ผħ㌱

Ŵ₡

Ŵف

ऑਙʉ ผ ₡ฌ

㌱ਙਙ ผ

Ŵ₡

ऑ ผਙŴк

ผ ㌱ผ Ŵ ħਙŴк

ٹ γħ㌱к

Ŵ₡

ऑŴผ

Ŵ₡Ŵ㌱㌱ ਙผħ ⊿

Ŵ

ผٹħ㌱

₡ ऑŴผ こ

ผٹħ㌱ħفฌ

γ

ऑ

ਙ⑾ħ こ

ਙк₡⊿

Ŵ₡

Ŵħٹ ਙผ

ਙผŴف

⑾Ŵ㌱ħкħ Ŵ

Ŵ Ŵ ħ㌱

к₡ਙਙผ

ƆʉŴऑ

Ҝ ⓒ

к

Ɔ㈠

Ｃ㌱Ŵ ผฌ

Աкٹ₡㈠

╗γ

γਙʉ ผਙਙこ

ʉ ਙ к₡

⇡ Ŵऑऑผਙゥħこ Ŵ к

ⓒｘｘｘ Ŵผ ׀

⑾

ħ

γ

ਙผ γʉ ผ

こ ਙ

㌱ਙผ ผ

ਙ⑾ γ ฌ

ゥħ ħف

⇡ ħк₡ħف㈠

╗γ

ผٹħ㌱

⑾Ŵ㌱ħкħ

Ŵ₡

ħٹ ਙผ

ਙผŴف

Ŵผ Ŵ

ʉ ਙ к₡⇡ ħ

γ

ゥħ ħف

″ⓒｘｘｘ

ો゜

׀ Ŵผ

⑾ਙਙ

こ Ŵк

⇡ ħк₡ħف

γŴ

ħ

Ŵ ゥ ₡

ਙ

γ

こ Ŵħ

⇡ ħк₡ħف

ਙ γ Ќ ਙผ γ

ħ₡

ਙ⑾

γ

ऑผਙऑ ผ ㈠ฌ

Ｃ Ŵٹ Ġ ਙ ผ

ਙ⑾Ḷ ऑ ผŴ ħਙ

╗γ

⇡ ħ

ʉ ਙ к₡

⇡ ਙऑ

ٹ

ӧ ỏ

₡Ŵ

ऑ ผ

ʉ ⓒ

⑾ผਙこ

ｘں

ｘｘ

AҜ

ħкฌ

ՙ

ｘｘ

ОҜ

Ҝ ਙ₡Ŵ ƆŴ ผ₡Ŵ

Ŵ₡

⑾ผਙこ

ｘں

ｘｘ

AҜ

ħк

ㄦ

ｘｘ ОҜ

ਙ

Ɔ ₡Ŵ㈠

╗γ

ऑŴ㌱

γŴ

Ŵ

A Ｃ A ฌ

Ŵ㌱㌱ ħ⇡к

ħ ゥ

ผ ผਙਙこ㈠

╗γ

γਙऑ

ħ

ħ׀

Ŵ₡ħŴ

к Ŵ

ㄦｘｘ

⑾

⑾ผਙこ

ผ ħ₡ ħŴк

ħ ㈠

╗γ

ऑผਙ㈾㌱ ฌ

ħħħ₡

Ŵ

㌱ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

⇡ ħк₡ħف

ħ

Ŵ

㌱ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк▷ਙ ㈠ฌ

Ġ Ŵ▷Ŵผ₡ਙ

Ҝ Ŵ ผħŴкف

╗γ

ħ こ

ผٹħ㌱ ₡

Ŵ

こ ħħこ Ŵк

Ŵこ ਙ

ਙ⑾ਙħкŴ₡

ਙ γ ผ

к ⇡ผħ㌱Ŵ

Ŵ₡ฌ

㌱к Ŵ ผ㈠

Aкк

⑾ ₡ ผŴкⓒ

Ŵ

Ŵ₡

㌱ħ

Ŵ₡Ŵผ₡

ਙ⑾ਙऑ ผŴ ħਙ

⑾ਙผ

Ŵ₡ ਙผ ف

ਙ⑾

γਙ こ Ŵ ผħŴк

ʉ ਙ к₡ฌ

⇡ Ŵ₡γ ผ ₡

ਙ

Ŵ

Ŵкк

ħこ㈠ฌ

ОŴผħف

╗γ

ऑŴผħف

ผ ׀ ħผ こ

ħ⇡Ŵ ₡

ऑਙŴ Ŵ ħ㌱ƥ

ਙ⑾

γ

ऑผਙऑ ผ

Ŵ₡

γ

ऑผਙ㈾㌱

ħ

ਙٹ ผ

ऑŴผ ₡㈠

Ŵ Ŵ ħ㌱ƥ

ผ ׀ ħผ

ՙՙฎ

ऑŴผħف

ऑŴ㌱

Ŵ₡

γ

ゥħ ħف

ऑŴผħف

⑾ħ к₡

ऑऑਙผ

Ձⓒںｘｘોฌ

ऑŴผħف

ऑŴ㌱㈠ฌ

Ɔ ผٹħ㌱

ਙ γ

Aผ Ŵ

╗γħ

ผٹħ㌱

ħ

₡ ₡

ħ

γ Ŵผ Ŵ㈠Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ

ਙʉ

ਙ⑾

ਙ㌱ਙਙ ผผ Ŵħк

γਙʉ ผਙਙこ ฌ

ਙผ ผٹħ㌱

⑾Ŵ㌱ħкħ ħ

ʉ ħ γħ

ʉ ਙ

ӧธỏ

こ ħк

ਙ⑾

γ

ऑผਙ㈾㌱

ਙ㌱Ŵ ħਙⓒ

Ŵ₡

Ŵ こ ਙ Ŵкк

ਙ⑾

γ

Ŵผ Ŵ

㌱ਙこ ऑ ħ ਙผฌ

Ŵผ кਙ㌱Ŵ ₡

Ŵ

ਙ⑾кں ㄦ㈠ฌ

╗ผŴОਙผ Ŵ ħਙ

Aк ผŴ ħٹ

Ɔ㌱ਙਙ ผ

⑾ħ

ਙ

ਙผ

ʉ ਙ

ऑ ਙऑк ㈠

╗γ

Ŵผ

Ŵħ ゥऑ ħٹ

Ŵ₡㌱ਙ

⑾⑾ ㌱ ħٹ ⓒฌ

ऑਙкк ħਙ

ผ ₡ ㌱ħفⓒ

ผŴ⑾⑾ħ㌱

Ŵ₡

ऑŴผħف

こ ħ ħفŴ ħف

Ŵк ผŴ ħٹ

ਙ

Ŵ ਙこ ਙ⇡ħк

ผŴऑਙผ Ŵ ħਙ㈠ฌ

Ő ⓒऑ ㌱ ⑾ ف

●

к ׀

₡ⓒฌ

⑾⑾ħ⊿ƥ

ⓒ⒕

ฌ

ｹएƥฌ

⇓﹝ฌ

ｘㄦ゜ｘธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡ″ธ

SUP-64491










SUBJECT:SDR-64218 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING -

APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS ICE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major

Amendment of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-41601) FOR A WAIVER OFTHE DOWNTOWN CENTENNIAL PLAN STREETSCAPE STANDARDS TO REMOVE

REQUIRED PALM TREES AND REPLACE WITH SHRUBS OR SHADE TREES AT AN

APPROVED OFFICE DEVELOPMENT on 1.01 acres at 501 South Las Vegas Boulevard (APN

139-34-301-011), Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-63847]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 7/20/2016








6. Action Letter for SDR-416017. Action Letter for SDR-42977

8. Action Letter for SDR-43975

9. Action Letter for SDR-45955









SDR-64218 [PRJ-63847]

SS

Conditions Page One


** CONDITIONS **

SDR-64218 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time may be filed for

consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

2. All development shall be in conformance with the site and landscape plan, date stamped04/12/16, except as amended by conditions herein.

3. A Waiver from the Downtown Centennial Plan Section VII.A.4 (Office Core StreetscapeStandards) is hereby approved, to allow no palm trees along Las Vegas Boulevard wherefour 25-foot tall Deglet-Noor date palm trees are required.


Safety.

5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set submittedfor building permit.

6. A revised technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, LandscapeArchitect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at the same

time application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground sprinkler system

is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility

of any traffic control device.

7. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be satisfied,except as modified herein.

Publi c Works

8. Contact the City Engineer’s Office at 702-229-6272 to coordinate the development of this

project with the “Las Vegas Boulevard Beautification – Stewart Avenue to Sahara Avenue”

capital improvement project, and any other public improvement projects adjacent to thissite. Comply with the recommendations of the City Engineer.

9. Site development to comply with all applicable conditions of approval for SDR-55201 andall other applicable site-related actions.







SDR-64218 [PRJ-63847]

SS





02/15/56

The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0008-56) from R-3 (LimitedMultiple Residence) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on the southeast corner of

Clark Avenue and 5th Street (now Las Vegas Boulevard) as part of a larger

request. The Planning Commission recommended approval.

08/03/11

The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-41606) from C-1 (LimitedCommercial) to C-2 (General Commercial) on 0.47 acres at the southwest

corner of Clark Avenue and Las Vegas Boulevard. The Planning

Commission and staff recommended approval.

The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-41661) a portion of a

public alley south of Clark Avenue, between Las Vegas Boulevard and 6th

Street. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-41601)

with three Waivers of the Downtown Centennial Plan for a proposed 62,000

square-foot, five-story office building with an attached five-level parkinggarage on 0.92 acres at the southeast corner of Las Vegas Boulevard and

Clark Avenue. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.

08/31/11

Department of Planning staff approved a Minor Amendment (SDR-42977) of

an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-41601) for a proposed

63,828 square-foot office building and five-story parking garage on 1.03 acresat the southeast corner of Clark Avenue and Las Vegas Boulevard.

01/10/12

The Planning Commission approved a Major Amendment (SDR-43975) of a

previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-41601) for a proposed 10-story, 131,228 square-foot office building and an eight-story parking garage on the southeast corner of Las Vegas Boulevard and Clark

Avenue. Staff recommended approval.

08/14/12

The Planning Commission approved Site Development Plan Review

(SDR-45955) for a Major Amendment to an approved Site Development PlanReview (SDR-41601) to increase the height of an approved 10-floor, 131,228

square-foot building to 11 floors and 143,498 square feet at the southeast

corner of Las Vegas Boulevard and Clark Avenue. Staff recommended

approval.

06/17/13

A Final Map (FMP-41988) for Reversion to Acreage of approximately 1.00

acre at the southeast corner of Las Vegas Boulevard and Clark Avenue wasrecorded.

07/24/14

Department of Planning staff approved a Minor Amendment (SDR-55054) of

an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-41601) for a proposed

1,200 square-foot addition to an existing office building and a four-leveladdition to an existing six-level parking garage on 1.01 acres at 501 South Las

Vegas Boulevard.



SDR-64218 [PRJ-63847]

SS






05/17/12

Civil improvement plans (42943) were approved for a proposed 62,000

square-foot office building and parking garage development at the southeast

corner of Clark Avenue and Las Vegas Boulevard.

06/19/12

A Building Permit (#202340) was issued for a 10-story shell building at 501

South Las Vegas Boulevard. A final inspection has not been approved.

A Building Permit (#202341) was issued for onsite improvements for a 10-story shell building at 501 South Las Vegas Boulevard. A final inspection has

not been approved.

06/12/13A Building Permit (#238154) was issued for Tenant Improvements at 501South Las Vegas Boulevard.

A Building Permit (#238157) was issued for Tenant Improvements at 501

South Las Vegas Boulevard.

10/02/14A building permit (223573) was issued for a building foundation only at 501

South Las Vegas Boulevard. A final inspection has not been approved.

10/06/14

A Building Permit (#238149) was issued for an office tenant improvement

buildout (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) at 501 South Las Vegas

Boulevard. A final inspection has not been approved.

A Building Permit (#238151) was issued for an office tenant improvement buildout (U.S. District Attorney) at 501 South Las Vegas Boulevard. A final

inspection was approved 02/17/16.A Building Permit (#238154) was issued for an office tenant improvement

buildout (Federal Protective Service) at 501 South Las Vegas Boulevard. Afinal inspection has not been approved.

A Building Permit (#238157) was issued for an office tenant improvement

buildout (Department of Labor) at 501 South Las Vegas Boulevard. A final

inspection has not been approved.

12/17/14A building permit (267988) was issued for a parking garage(foundation/structural) only at 501 South Las Vegas Boulevard. A final

inspection has not been approved.

01/28/16A building permit (286939) was issued for a parking garage at 501 South Las

Vegas Boulevard. A final inspection has not been approved.


03/16/16

A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss submittalrequirements for a Site Development Plan Review. A Waiver of the

Downtown Centennial Plan Streetscape Standards will be necessary to deviate

from



SDR-64218 [PRJ-63847]

SS





F ield Check

05/05/16

A field check revealed that the frontages adjacent to the building at 501 South

Las Vegas Boulevard were complete, but the landscape planter/amenity zone

on the Las Vegas Boulevard frontage is devoid of plants.


Site Area

Net Acres 1.01

Surrounding

Property

Ex isting Land Use

Per Ti tle 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject Property Parking Lot C (Commercial)C-2 (General

Commercial)

North Government Facility PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)

South

Office

C (Commercial)

C-1 (LimitedCommercial)

RestaurantC-2 (General

Commercial)

East Office C (Commercial)P-R (Professional Office

and Parking)

West Undeveloped C (Commercial)C-2 (GeneralCommercial)


Downtown Centennial Plan Y


Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District (Office Core District) N

Live/Work Overlay District N/ALas Vegas Boulevard Scenic Byway Overlay District Y


Trails (Scenic Byway Trail) Y

Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y





SDR-64218 [PRJ-63847]

SS




Street Name

Functional

Classif ication of

Street(s)

Govern ing Document

Actual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliance

with Street

Section

Las VegasBoulevard

Primary ArterialMaster Plan of Streets

and Highways Map84 N

Clark Avenue Major CollectorMaster Plan of Streets

and Highways Map80 Y

Pursuant to the Downtown Centennial Plan, the fol lowing streetscape standards apply:

Streetscape Standards Requi red Provided Compli ance

Las Vegas Boulevard(North-south major street)

5’ amenity zone 5’ amenity zone Y

10’ sidewalk 10’ sidewalk Y

25’ tall Deglet-Noor date palm trees on center in

30’ increments

(4 trees along Las Vegas

Blvd)

Zero palm trees

5-gallon Deer Grass,Santa Cruz Pyracantha,

Bluebells

N

Waivers

Requi rement Request Staff Recommendati on

25’ tall Deglet-Noor date palm

trees on center in 30’

increments(4 trees along Las Vegas Blvd)

To allow zero palm trees, 5-gallon DeerGrass, Santa Cruz Pyracantha,

Bluebells

Approval



ｘㅡ゜ ธ゜ ″

ОŐİ ″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218



ｘㅡ゜ ธ゜ ″

ОŐİ ″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218





Ɔ Ġ ǲ ǲ ╗ Ќ Ⓢ Ҝ Ա ǲ Ő

Ɔ ǲ A Ձ

Ő ǲ Ћ ● Ɔ ● Ḷ Ќ Ɔ О Ő Ḷ İ ǲ ╗ ╗ ● ╗ Ձ ǲ

₡ ผ Ŵ к İ ħ ㌱ ╗ ਙ ʉ ผ О Ő Ḷ İ ǲ ╗ A ＣＣ Ő ǲ Ɔ Ɔ

ㄦｘ Ɔ ㈠ Ձ Ŵ Ћ Ŵ Ա ਙ к Ŵ ผ ₡ Ձ Ŵ Ћ Ŵ ⓒ Ќ Ћ ฎ ɱ ｘ

Ｃ ǲ Ɔ Ő ● О ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ Ｃ A ╗ ǲ

Ｃ A ╗ ǲ

● Ɔ Ɔ Ⓢ ǲ Ｃ Ḷ Ő

О Ő Ḷ İ ǲ ╗ Ќ Ⓢ Ҝ Ա ǲ Ő

Ɔ ● Ձ Ћ İ ╗ ｘ ՙ ՙ ㄦ Ձ Ћ

ں

ธ ゜ ㅡ ゜ ธ ｘㄦ

Ɔ Ġ ǲ ǲ ╗ ╗ ● ╗ Ձ ǲ

Ġ ǲ ǲ Ｃ Ա İ

Ｃ Ő A Û Ќ Ա ǲ Ｃ

ਙ ผ Ŵ ㌱ ਙ ผ γ Ŵ к кٹ

ผ ħ ⑾ Ŵ к к ㌱ ਙ ₡ ħ ħ ਙ Ŵ ₡ こ

Ŵ

ผ こ

ħ ⑾ ħ

к ₡ ㈠ ਙ ผ Ŵ ㌱ ਙ ผ こ

ਙ ħ ⑾ Ձ Ŵ ₡ ㌱ Ŵ ऑ

A ผ ㌱ γ ħ

㌱ ਙ ⑾ Ŵ ₡ ħ ㌱ ผ ऑ Ŵ ㌱ ħ

⑾ ਙ ₡ ऑ ผ ħ ਙ ผ ਙ ㌱ ਙ ここ

㌱ ħ

ʉ ਙ ผ ㈠

О Ő ǲ О A Ő ǲ Ｃ Ḷ Ő

Ձ A Ɔ Ћ ǲ Ḛ A Ɔ ● ǲ ⓒ Ձ Ձ ゜ Ḷ Ɔ Ｃ A ⓒ ● Ќ ㈠

ㄦ ″ ㄦㄦ Ɔ Ḷ Ⓢ ╗ Ġ Ḷ Ɔ ǲ Ҝ ● ╗ ǲ Ɔ ╗ Ő ǲ ǲ ╗ ⓒ Ɔ ╗ ǲ ㈠ｘ

Ḛ Ő ǲ ǲ Ќ Û Ḷ Ḷ Ｃ Ћ ● Ձ Ձ A Ḛ ǲ ⓒ Ḷ ฎ ｘ

О Ġ ㈠ ӧ ｘ ỏ ธ ธ ｘｘㄦｘｘ ǲ Ṳ ╗ ㈠ ธ ｘ ɱ

ں

ธ ゜ ㅡ ゜ㄦ

Ő ǲ Ћ ● ǲ Û ゜ Ḷ Ќ Ɔ ╗ Ő Ⓢ ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ Ɔ ǲ ╗

ｘ ″ ゜ｘ゜ ″

ㄦ Ő こ ਙ ₡ Ｃ Ŵ О Ŵ к こ ╗ ผ ธ ゜ ㅡ ゜ㄦ Ձ

㈠ ธ

● ผ ผ ħف

Ŵ ħ ਙ О к Ŵ

Ḛ Ő A О Ġ ● Ɔ A Ձ ǲ

ӧ फ ए ธ ｘ ƥ ｘ फ ỏ

ｘ ƥ

ㄦ ƥ

ں

ｘ ƥ

ธ ｘ ƥ

Ɔ Ġ ǲ ╗ Ќ Ⓢ

A ╗ ǲ

● Ɔ Ɔ Ⓢ ǲ Ｃ

ں

ธ

Ġ ǲ ǲ Ｃ

Ő A Û Ќ Ա

ผ Ŵ ㌱ ਙ ผ

㌱ ħف

ʉ ਙ ผ

ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ゜ ″

О Ő İ ″ ฎ ㅡ ՙ

S D

R

6 4 2 1 8



ｘㅡ゜ ธ゜ ″

ОŐİ ″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218



ｘㅡ゜ ธ゜ ″

ОŐİ ″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218



S D R - 6 4 2 1 8 [ P R J - 6 3 8

4 7 ] - S I T E D E V E L O P M E N T P L A N

R E V I E W - A P P L I C A N T / O W N E R : L A S V E G A S I C E ,

L L C 5 0 1 S O U T H L A S V E G A S B O U L E V A R D

0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6



S D R - 6 4 2 1 8 [ P R J - 6 3 8




0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6



S D R - 6 4 2 1 8 [ P R J - 6 3 8




0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6



S D R - 6 4 2 1 8 [ P R J - 6 3 8




0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6





ｘㅡ゜ ธ゜ ″

ОŐİ ″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218





Ḛħ こ Ŵ ㌱Ŵкк к שɸ Ŵкש ՙｘธ ธ″ ｘㄦธ

Ҝ Ձ Őਙ⇡ħਙ

Ⓢħٹ ผħש ਙ⑾ Ќٹ Ŵ₡Ŵ ਙਙऑ ǲゥש

Ɔऑ ㌱ħŴкħש゜Aਙ㌱ħŴש Оผਙ⑾ ਙผ

ÛŴש ผ゜ǲٹħผਙこ שŴк Ġਙผ שħ㌱кשผ

ՙｘธ ธㄦՙ ㄦㄦธɱ

Ŵゥ ՙｘธ ธธธ ｘｘ

ǲこŴħк ผਙ⇡ħਙこк㌀ผ㈠ ₡

ฎｘㄦｘ ОŴผŴ₡ħ Ő₡

ՁŴ Ћف Ŵ ЌЋ ฎɱ ธ

ผਙこ

İŴこ

γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ ∵こŴħкש

ਙ ㈾Ŵこ

㌱γŴ₡₡ħ㌱㌀ف

こŴħк㈠㌱ਙこべ

Ɔ

╗γผ₡Ŵⓒ

⇡ผŴผ ⓒ ธｘ

″ ธｘㅡ ОҜ

╗ਙ ҜŴผħ㌱

Ձ Őਙ⇡ħਙ ｹผਙ⇡ħਙこ㌀㌱

㈠ผ㈠

₡⒕

Ɔ⇡㈾㌱ ОŴкこ Ợ שħਙ

Ġħ ҜՁ⁸

Ġਙʉ Ŵผ ਙ﹒

● γŴٹ

Ŵ ऑŴкこ׀

ħਙ ⑾ਙผ ਙ⁸ ● γŴٹ

Ŵ ħ

Ŵ

ħਙ ʉγ ผ ● γŴٹ

ਙ ㌱ผ Ŵ

Ŵ ऑਙ

ħŴк ऑкŴ

ผ ⑾ਙผ Ŵ

こħħここ ธㅡफ Ա╗Ġ Оγਙ ħゥ ₡Ŵ㌱ кħ⑾ ผŴ㈠ ╗γħ ऑкŴ ผ こ γਙк₡ Ŵкк γ ⑾ккفผਙʉ ऑŴкこƥ ʉ ħفγ ⓒ ऑк ਙħк こ ₡ħŴ Ŵ₡゜ਙผ ЌḶ╗ Ŵккਙʉ ผਙਙ ऑ ผŴ ħਙ ⇡ кਙʉ ħ ⊿ ⑾ਙผ ħ ħ ف ਙħف ਙٹ ผ Ŵ ㄦｘો Ŵผ ਙк₡

ผผŴ ㌱ਙ

Ŵ ㌱ਙ₡ħ

㈠

ｘㅡ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ

″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218



ÛγŴ

ʉਙк₡ ⇡ ਙผ ゥऑ ผ

ਙऑħħਙ ਙ γ こħħここ ₡ħこħਙ ӧ₡ ऑ

γ Ṳ ʉħ₡

γỏ ⑾ਙผ γħ ऑкŴ

ผ

ਙ γਙк₡ Ŵ ⑾кк ผਙʉ ऑŴкこⓒ ਙ ऑऑਙผف Ŵ γ Ŵк γ ผਙਙ こ Ŵ₡ ਙ γŴٹ ħ ㌱ਙਙ ħ ਙผ ゥ ผ こ γ Ŵ ﹒ ԱŴħ㌱Ŵккⓒ ● Ŵこ㌱ਙħ₡ผħف ₡ħفħف Ŵ फऑਙ फ こ ਙ ⇡ ऑкŴ㌱₡ ਙٹ ผ γħ ㌱ਙ₡ħ ㈠

╗γŴ ħ Ŵ₡ٹŴ㌱ Ŵ₡ ● γਙऑ Ŵкк ħ ʉкк㈠

Ա ⓒ

İħこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱⊿ ҜՁAⓒ ЌЋ ŐՁA ՙㄦ ⓒ ՁAŐԱ ″ธ ⓒ AƆՁAⓒ Aккħ ₡ A●A

İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ Aਙ㌱ħŴ ⓒ ՁՁ

ՙｘธ ㅡɱɱ ｘՙㄦธ ╗

ՙｘธ ɱ″ ՙɱｘ″

ʉʉʉ㈠㈾㌱ŴкŴ㈠㌱ਙこ∵㈾㌱ŴкŴ㈠㌱ਙこべ

ʉʉʉ㈠ γ こ ਙ⑾ فŴこħف㈠㌱ਙこ∵ γ こ ਙ⑾ فŴこħف㈠㌱ਙこべ

Ок Ŵ Ќਙ

╗γ ผŴこħ

Ŵкⓒ Ŵ

Ŵ㌱γこ

ӧỏ Ŵ₡ ₡ ħف

ʉਙผ ħ㌱к₡ ₡ γ ผ ħ Ŵผ ㌱ਙऑผħف

γ

ਙ⑾ İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ Aਙ㌱ħŴ

ⓒ ՁՁ㈠ Ⓢк ਙ

γ ผʉħ

ħ₡ħ㌱Ŵ ₡ ਙผ ਙ⇡ٹħਙ ⑾ผਙこ ħ Ŵ ผ ⓒ γ ħ⑾ਙผこŴ ħਙ ħ γħ ผŴこħ Ŵк ħ ㌱ਙ⑾ħ₡ ħŴк Ŵ₡ ħ ħ ₡ ₡ ਙк к ⑾ਙผ γ ਙ⑾ γ ħ₡ħٹħ₡Ŵкӧỏ Ŵこ ₡ Ŵ⇡ਙٹ ㈠ ●⑾

ਙⓒ γ ผ Ŵ₡ ผ ਙ⑾ γħ こ Ŵف Ŵผ ਙ γ ħ ₡ ₡ ผ ㌱ħऑħ ⓒ ਙ Ŵผ γผ ⇡ ਙ ħ⑾ħ ₡ γŴ Ŵ ₡ħ こħŴ ħਙⓒ ₡ħ ผħ⇡ ħਙⓒ ㌱ਙऑħف ਙผ ⑾ਙผʉŴผ₡ħف ਙ⑾ γħผŴこħ

Ŵк ħ

ผħ㌱

к ऑผਙγħ⇡ħ

₡㈠ ●⑾ ਙ γŴٹ

ผ ㌱ ħٹ

₡ γħ ผŴこħ

Ŵк ħ ผผਙผⓒ ऑк Ŵ Ŵ₡ٹ

ħ γ ₡ ผ ħここ ₡ħŴ

к Ŵ₡ ₡

ผਙ γ Ŵ㌱㌱ਙこऑŴħف

ผŴこħ

Ŵк㈠ ╗γŴ ਙ㈠


İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ Aਙ㌱ħŴ ⓒ ՁՁՙｘธ ㅡɱɱ ｘՙㄦธ ╗ՙｘธ ɱ″ ՙɱｘ″ ʉʉʉ㈠㈾㌱ŴкŴ㈠㌱ਙこ∵㈾㌱ŴкŴ㈠㌱ਙこべʉʉʉ㈠ γ こ ਙ⑾ فŴこħف㈠㌱ਙこ∵ γ こ ਙ⑾ فŴこħف㈠㌱ਙこべ

Ок Ŵ Ќਙ

╗γ ผŴこħ

Ŵкⓒ Ŵ

Ŵ㌱γこ

ӧỏ Ŵ₡ ₡ ħف

ʉਙผ ħ㌱к₡ ₡ γ ผ ħ Ŵผ ㌱ਙऑผħف

γ



γ ผʉħ

ħ₡ħ㌱Ŵ

₡ ਙผ ਙ⇡ٹ

ħਙ ⑾ผਙこ ħ

Ŵ

ผ ⓒ γ ħ⑾ਙผこŴ

ħਙ ħ γħ ผŴこħ

Ŵк ħ ㌱ਙ⑾ħ₡

ħŴк Ŵ₡ ħ ħ

₡ ₡ ਙк к ⑾ਙผ γ ਙ⑾ γ ħ₡ħٹ

ħ₡Ŵкӧỏ Ŵこ ₡ Ŵ⇡ਙٹ

㈠ ●⑾

ਙⓒ γ ผ Ŵ₡ ผ ਙ⑾ γħ こ Ŵف Ŵผ ਙ γ ħ ₡ ₡ ผ ㌱ħऑħ ⓒ ਙ Ŵผ γผ ⇡ ਙ ħ⑾ħ ₡ γŴ Ŵ ₡ħ こħŴ ħਙⓒ ₡ħ ผħ⇡ ħਙⓒ ㌱ਙऑħف ਙผ ⑾ਙผʉŴผ₡ħف ਙ⑾ γħผŴこħ

Ŵк ħ

ผħ㌱

к ऑผਙγħ⇡ħ

₡㈠ ●⑾ ਙ γŴٹ

ผ ㌱ ħٹ

₡ γħ ผŴこħ

Ŵк ħ ผผਙผⓒ ऑк Ŵ Ŵ₡ٹ

ħ γ ₡ ผ ħここ ₡ħŴ

к Ŵ₡ ₡

ผਙ γ Ŵ㌱㌱ਙこऑŴħف

ผŴこħ

Ŵк㈠ ╗γŴ ਙ㈠ ผਙ

Ŵ㌱㌱ਙこऑŴ ف

ｘㅡ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ

″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218



İħこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱⊿ ҜՁAⓒ ЌЋ ŐՁA ՙㄦ ⓒ ՁAŐԱ ″ธ ⓒ AƆՁAⓒ Aккħ ₡ A●AİŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ Aਙ㌱ħŴ

ⓒ ՁՁՙｘธ ㅡɱɱ ｘՙㄦธ ╗ՙｘธ ɱ″ ՙɱｘ″

ʉʉʉ㈠㈾㌱ŴкŴ㈠㌱ਙこ

ʉʉʉ㈠ γ こ ਙ⑾ فŴこħف㈠㌱ਙこ

Ок Ŵ Ќਙ ╗γ ผŴこħ Ŵкⓒ Ŵ Ŵ㌱γこ ӧỏ Ŵ₡ ₡ ħف ʉਙผ ħ㌱к₡ ₡ γ ผ ħ Ŵผ ㌱ਙऑผħفγ ਙ⑾ İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ Aਙ㌱ħŴ ⓒ ՁՁ㈠ Ⓢк ਙ γ ผʉħ

ħ₡ħ㌱Ŵ ₡ ਙผ ਙ⇡ٹħਙ ⑾ผਙこ ħ Ŵ ผ ⓒ γ ħ⑾ਙผこŴ ħਙ ħ γħ ผŴこħ Ŵк ħ ㌱ਙ⑾ħ₡ ħŴк Ŵ₡ ħ ħ ₡ ₡ ਙк к ⑾ਙผ γ ਙ⑾ γ ħ₡ħٹħ₡Ŵкӧỏ Ŵこ ₡ Ŵ⇡ਙٹ ㈠ ●⑾

ਙⓒ γ ผ Ŵ₡ ผ ਙ⑾ γħ こ Ŵف Ŵผ ਙ γ ħ ₡ ₡ ผ ㌱ħऑħ ⓒ ਙ Ŵผ γผ ⇡ ਙ ħ⑾ħ ₡ γŴ Ŵ ₡ħ こħŴ ħਙⓒ ₡ħ ผħ⇡ ħਙⓒ ㌱ਙऑħف ਙผ ⑾ਙผʉŴผ₡ħف ਙ⑾ γħ

ผŴこħ Ŵк ħ ผħ㌱ к ऑผਙγħ⇡ħ ₡㈠ ●⑾ ਙ γŴٹ ผ ㌱ ħٹ ₡ γħ ผŴこħ Ŵк ħ ผผਙผⓒ ऑк Ŵ Ŵ₡ٹħ γ ₡ ผ ħここ ₡ħŴ к Ŵ₡ ₡ ผਙ γ Ŵ㌱㌱ਙこऑŴħف

ผŴこħ Ŵк㈠ ╗γŴ ਙ㈠

ｘㅡ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ

″ฎㅡՙSDR-64218



゜ธ ゜ ″ⓒ ธ ธこŴħк ₡ ผŴк İשħ㌱ ╗ਙʉผ⊿ ｘՙٹㄦ″ฎฎ⊿ О ผこħש ㅡธɱㅡ⊿ ОŴкこ ╗ผ ʉħשγ ŐŴħ ₡ ОкŴש ผ

ОŴف שऑ゜゜こŴħк㈠ кفਙਙف ㈠㌱ਙこ゜こŴħк゜﹒ħएธ ħएฎ⑾㌱⑾ฎ ｘɱ″ٹ ħ ʉएऑש ㌱Ŵ एİこкए ㄦ ՙש ɱŴ″ՙｘՙฎฎฎ ՙ ħこкए ㄦ ฎฎŴɱ㌱ㅡ″ŴŴ㌱ՙฎ ħこкए ㄦ ฎฎ⇡ฎฎ ㄦㄦ″ㄦ⑾ㅡ

İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ｹ㈾Ŵこ㌱γŴ₡₡ħ㌱㌀こŴħк㈠㌱ਙこ

₡ ผŴк İשħ㌱ ╗ਙʉ ผ⊿ ㅡธɱㅡ⊿ ОŴкこ ╗ผשㄦ″ฎฎ⊿ О ผこħٹｘՙں ʉħשγ ŐŴħ ₡ ОкŴש ผㄦこ Ŵ

İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ｹ㈾Ŵこ

㌱γŴ₡₡ħ㌱㌀

こŴħк㈠㌱ਙこ⒕ Ҝਙⓒ Ｃ

㌱ ⓒ ธｘں

ㄦ Ŵש

ںں

ㄦں

╗ਙ AĠںՙɱฎ㌀Ŵשש㈠㌱ਙこ㌱

ОŴ㌱ਙ Ġਙผ

ש

Ŵ ｹऑŴ㌱ਙγ㌀ħкٹ

ผкŴ₡ħ㌱㈠㌱ਙこ⒕ⓒ ǲผħ㌱

кк ｹ

ผħ㌱㌀ħкٹ

ผкŴ₡ħ㌱㈠㌱ਙこ⒕ⓒ こŴ

ŴŴ㌀ผ⇡ħкש

Ŵ㈠㌱ਙこⓒＣ

こש

ผħ㌀кਙ㌱γŴ㈠㌱ਙこ

Ġħ Aкк ⓒ

● Ŵこ γש ऑ ผٹħħ ՁŴ₡㌱Ŵऑ Aผ㌱γħש ㌱ש ⑾ਙผשγ ₡ ผŴк İשħ㌱ ╗ਙʉ ผ ऑผਙ㈾㌱ש㈠

╗γŴ ⑾ਙผ Ŵħש γש ħこש こש ਙ кש ਙʉ ਙผ ਙऑħħਙ Ŵ₡ שŴש ㌱ਙ₡ħשħਙ ਙ⑾ ਙผ ㌱ਙここħ㌱Ŵשħਙ ħ⑾ผŴשผ㌱שผ ⑾ਙ₡ ⇡ кਙʉ γש ħ₡ ʉŴк Ŵש ՁŴ Ћ Ŵ Աਙк ٹŴผ₡㈠ ԱŴ ₡ ਙ ʉγŴש ਙ γŴٹ שਙк₡ ここ ₡ ผשŴ₡ħ ħ ਙʉ γħש

ں

㈠ ╗γħ ㌱ਙ₡ħש

ש

こש

γŴש

㌱Ŵผผħ

A╗ ╗ɸ ㌱ਙここħ㌱Ŵש

ħਙ ש

こ ħ ⑾ਙ₡ Ŵ₡ Ŵ ŴऑऑผਙゥħこŴש

₡

ऑש

γ ਙ⑾ ɸ㈠

ธ㈠ ש ħ Ŵש● ผผŴ ㌱ਙששŴ ㌱ਙ₡ħש ħשŴкк ₡ ħ γש кŴש ںɱㄦｘ ਙש ɱ″ｘ㈠ں

㈠ ผ Ձħⓒ Ћ ผħ▷ਙשħਙ ⑾ਙผ שγ ผ ㌱ਙここħ㌱Ŵש Ŵкਙ ਙש ਙผ кħ ⓒ ⇡ש ㈾ש ㌱Ŵผผħ ਙש● ㌱㈠ש

ㅡ㈠ Ҝ ऑผਙऑਙ

₡ ऑŴкこש

ผ

ऑкŴש

ħ

ʉħкк ⇡

ऑкŴ㌱

₡ ₡ħผ

㌱ש

к Ŵ⇡ਙש ٹ

γħ ħ⑾ผŴש

ผ㌱ש

ผ

㈠

● γŴٹ ⇡ ₡ħผ ㌱ש ₡ ⇡ こ㌱кħ שӧỏ שỏ Ҝ ₡㈾ਙਙк ＣŴשผ γ ħ γש ⑾ਙผ ธㄦɸ ӧ⇡ผਙʉשਙ ऑкŴש ОŴкこ㉬Оγਙ ħゥ ₡Ŵ㌱ кħ⑾ ผŴҜ ₡㈾ਙਙкɸⓒ Ŵ

ש

ｘɸ ऑŴ㌱ħ

ⓒ Ŵкਙ

ՁŴ Ћ

Ŵ Աਙкٹ

Ŵผ₡ Ŵ⇡ਙש ٹ

γħ ħ⑾ผŴש

ผ㌱ש

ผ

㈠ A ש

ħש

ŴккŴש

ħਙⓒש

γ

ʉħкк ʉ

ħ

γ ɱⓒｘｘｘऑਙ₡ⓒ ऑк ਙħк こ ₡ħŴ Ŵש ںⓒｘｘｘ ऑਙ₡ ŴऑऑผਙゥħこŴש к㈠ ╗γ ʉħкк ⇡ ऑкŴ㌱ ₡ ħ Ŵ⇡ਙٹ ħ₡ ʉŴк ผŴ₡ ऑผਙऑਙ ₡ ऑкŴש ਙ⑾ ŴऑऑผਙゥħこŴ

ש

кں

ฎ㈚ש

ਙ ธɸ γ

ħ

γש

Ŵ₡ ʉħש

γ Ŵ ऑкŴש

ħ

Ŵผ

Ŵ ʉ

кк ʉħ₡ש

γ ਙ⑾ ㅡɸ ธ㈚㈠

╗γ ₡Ŵש ऑŴкこ㌱Ŵ Ŵ㌱γħ ٹ Ŵ こŴשผ γ ħ γש ਙ⑾ ऑʉŴผ₡שਙ ฎｘɸⓒ ʉγħ㌱γ こ Ŵ γ ʉħкк ਙкש ٹħ ผ ਙٹ γ Ŵש ผ ħこש ਙשธฎⓒｘｘｘો ऑਙ₡ⓒ Ŵкשγਙ γ γħ ʉħккש Ŵש ₡ ㌱Ŵ₡ ٹ ਙ Ŵ㌱γħש ㈠ ӧ שħこŴש ㄦｘો Ŵผỏ

Û ㌱Ŵ ₡ ħ Ŵ こਙผ γ Ŵٹħк ħ ผ ₡ ऑкŴש ผ ⇡ਙゥ ש こⓒ ⇡ ₡ ʉਙкשγŴש こ㌱γ γħ γ ผ Ŵ⇡ਙٹ שγ ħ₡ ʉŴк ผŴ₡ ⓒ

γ ש ש こŴ ħγħ⇡ħש ਙผ Ŵ⇡ħкħש ħ㌱ٹਙ ผש γ ש ㌱ਙここħ㌱Ŵשħਙ кħ ⓒ Ŵש שγ ⑾ਙผ ऑਙħש ਙ⑾ ऑкŴשħ ⓒ ऑผਙٹ ㌱ਙש ऑผਙγħ⇡ħשħٹ ⑾ਙผ γש ㌱кħ ש Ŵ₡ Ŵऑऑ Ŵкħ ਙש γש ऑкŴ ผ Ŵש ħש ਙ⑾ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵ㈠ ОŴкこ ผש ผٹħٹŴк ʉħשγħ ㌱γ Ŵкк ผשऑкŴש ผ ⇡Ŵ ₡ ਙ γש ʉħ₡שγ ㌱к ŴผŴ㌱ Ŵ₡ Ŵऑ ㌱ש ਙ⑾ кਙ㌱Ŵשħਙ ● ผŴש Ŵ ऑਙਙผ ₡ שਙ γ Ŵש Ŵħ ऑਙשγ ผਙਙש ש こ㈠

ԱŴ ₡ ਙ ਙผ ㌱ਙٹ ผŴשħਙ Ŵ₡ γש ħ⑾ਙผこŴשħਙ ħ γħ こŴħкⓒ ● ʉਙк₡ кħש ਙผ ਙऑħħਙ ਙ⑾ ⇡ ש ऑผŴ㌱שħ㌱ ⑾ਙผ ħਙשŴשγħ ħשA₡₡ħשħਙŴккⓒ Ŵ ㌱ਙשŴ㌱ש ħ⑾ਙผこŴשħਙ ਙ ㌱ਙк₡ ऑผਙٹħ₡ ਙ γש ਙשγ ผ ㌱ਙここħ㌱Ŵשħਙ ㌱ਙこऑŴħ ٹ γŴשγŴש кħ ħ γħשγŴผ ₡ ㌱ਙ₡ħש Ŵ ⇡ ש Ŵ ਙ ㌱Ŵ ₡ħ㌱ਙٹ ผ ʉਙк₡ ⇡ こਙש Ŵऑऑผ ㌱ħŴש ₡㈠

ฎ ħこкए ㄦ ฎฎ⇡ฎฎ ㄦㄦ″

⇡ ש ऑผŴ㌱שħ㌱ ⑾ਙผ שਙこऑŴ ħ שγŴש γŴٹ

ｘㅡ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ

″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218





Ɔħ㌱ ผ к ਙผⓒ

İħこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱⊿ ҜՁAⓒ ЌЋ ŐՁA ՙㄦں

ⓒ AƆՁAⓒ Aккħ

₡ A●Aⓒ ՁAŐԱİŴこ

γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ Aਙ㌱ħŴש

ⓒ ՁՁՙｘธ ㅡɱɱ ｘՙㄦธ ╗

ՙｘธ ɱ″ ՙɱｘ″ ʉʉʉ㈠㈾㌱ŴкŴ㈠㌱ਙこʉʉʉ㈠שγ こ ਙ⑾ Ŵこħ ㈠㌱ਙこ

Ок Ŵ Ќਙש ╗γ ӧỏ Ŵ₡ ₡ ħ ʉਙผ ħ㌱к₡ ₡ γ ผ ħ ŴผשŴ㌱γこ ששŴкⓒ ŴששผŴこħש ㌱ਙऑผħ γש ਙ⑾ İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ Aਙ㌱ħŴש ⓒ ՁՁ㈠ Ⓢк ਙשγ ผʉħ

ħ₡ħ㌱Ŵש ₡ ਙผ ਙ⇡ٹħਙ ⑾ผਙこ ħש Ŵשผ ⓒ γש ħ⑾ਙผこŴשħਙ ħ γħש שħŴк Ŵ₡ ħ ħשŴк ħ ㌱ਙ⑾ħ₡ ששผŴこħש ₡ ₡ ਙк к ⑾ਙผ γש ਙ⑾ γש ħ₡ħٹħ₡Ŵкӧỏ Ŵこ ₡ Ŵ⇡ਙٹ ㈠ ●⑾

ਙⓒ γש ผ Ŵ₡ ผ ਙ⑾ γħ こ Ŵש Ŵผ ਙש שγ ħש ₡ ₡ ผ ㌱ħऑħ שⓒ ਙ Ŵผ γ ผ ⇡ ਙשħ⑾ħ ₡ ħਙⓒ ㌱ਙऑħשผħ⇡שħਙⓒ ₡ħש Ŵ ₡ħ こħŴשγŴש ਙผ ⑾ਙผʉŴผ₡ħ ਙ⑾ γħש

שк ऑผਙγħ⇡ħשผħ㌱שŴк ħ ששผŴこħש ₡㈠ ●⑾ ਙ γŴٹ ผ ㌱ ħٹ ₡ γħש Ŵк ħ ผผਙผⓒ ऑк ŴששผŴこħש Ŵ₡ٹħ γש ₡ ผ ħここ ₡ħŴש к Ŵ₡ ₡ שผਙ γש Ŵ㌱㌱ਙこऑŴħ

ש

ผŴこħשש


ĠǲЌＣǲŐƆḶЌⓒ AՁՁǲЌ ｹŴγںՙɱฎ㌀Ŵשש㈠㌱ਙこ⒕ Ҝਙⓒ Ｃ㌱ ⓒ ธｘںㄦ Ŵש ธㅡｘ ╗ਙ İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ｹ㈾Ŵこ㌱γŴ₡₡ħ㌱㌀こŴħк㈠㌱ਙこ⒕

㌱ फĠǲՁŐ●Ġⓒ ՁǲÛ●Ɔ Ҝफ ｹкγธㄦ㈠㌱ਙこ⒕ששㅡ㌀Ŵں

İħこ

О ผ ਙผ ㌱ਙ ผŴשħਙ Ŵ⇡ਙש שγ ऑŴкこ ⑾ਙผ γש ₡ ผŴк İשħ㌱ ╗ਙʉ ผ ਙ ՁŴ Ћ فŴ Աк㈠ ● γħفγк Ŵ₡ ħ ŴفŴħש

ऑששħف שγŴש Ŵこਙ ਙ⑾ ʉש ħفγש ਙ ਙऑ ਙ⑾ Ŵש ש ผผŴ㌱ਙששŴ ₡㌱ ⇡Ŵⓒ A╗ ╗ γŴ Ŵ γħفγ ऑผਙңк ң⇡ ผ ผŴこħħਙ кħש

ผħف ⇡ ʉש ՁŴ Ћ فŴ Ŵ₡ ƆŴкש ՁŴ ħש ʉħשγ ⑾ ₡ ผŴкⓒ שŴש ⓒ Ŵ₡ кਙ㌱Ŵк ऑк ਙשผŴ⑾ң㌱ ਙ ħש γ ऑผਙңкفγ ผ γħש

₡Ŵש

Ŵש

γŴש

㌱ਙ

㌱ש

ʉħש

γ ਙש

γ

ผ кਙ㌱Ŵש

ħਙש

γผ ਙש

ש

γ

Ⓢħש

₡ Ɔש

Ŵש

Ŵ₡ש

γ

ผ

ש

ਙ⑾ש

γ

ʉਙผк₡㈠ ╗γħ ң⇡

ผ ħ

㌱ਙħ₡ ผ ₡ Ŵ שŴк ң⇡ ผ ผਙשħ שผŴ㌱ਙש ħ㌱ ħש ㌱ਙ ㌱ש こкשħऑк שŴש γ ผ ⑾ਙผש فਙש γש ऑผऑਙ ਙ⑾

㌱ਙここħ㌱Ŵשħਙⓒ ħש ħ ħ Ŵкש ₡ŴこŴשγŴש ف ⇡ Ŵ ਙħ₡ ₡ ਙผ Ŵ ਙשਙ ħש γ ผ кħ ħש ₡㌱ ⇡ŴשγŴש ऑผਙשγŴש ħ₡ ㌱ਙここħ㌱Ŵשħਙ ਙש γש ՁŴ Ћ فŴ Ŵкк Ŵ₡ ⇡ ਙ₡㈠

╗γŴ ਙ

Aкк Ġ ₡ ผਙ

ՙｘธ ՙ″ฎں ฎɱ

ผਙこ İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ ∵こŴħкשਙ ㈾Ŵこ㌱γŴ₡₡ħ㌱㌀こŴħк㈠㌱ਙこべ

Ɔ

Ҝਙ₡Ŵⓒ Ｃ㌱こ⇡ ผ ｘՙⓒ ธｘںㄦㄦธ AҜںں

╗ਙ ĠǲЌＣǲŐƆḶЌⓒ AՁՁǲЌ

㌱ ОŴ㌱ਙ Ġਙผ ⊿Ŵ⊿ ǲผħ㌱ ккש こŴ ŴŴ㌀ผ⇡ħкש Ŵ㈠㌱ਙこ⊿ Ｃこ שผħ㌀кਙ㌱γŴ㈠㌱ਙこ

Ɔ⇡㈾㌱ ₡ ผŴк İשħ㌱ ╗ਙʉ ผ⊿ ㅡธɱㅡ⊿ ОŴкこ ╗ผשｘՙ ㄦ″ฎฎ⊿ О ผこħں ʉħשγ ŐŴħ ₡ ОкŴש ผ

∵Ợਙש ₡ ש ゥש γħ₡₡ べ

ฎ ħこкए ㄦ ฎฎ⇡ฎฎ ㄦㄦ″

ש

ｘㅡ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ

″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218





İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ｹ㈾Ŵこ㌱γŴ₡₡ħ㌱㌀こŴħк㈠㌱ਙこ⒕ Ҝਙⓒ Ｃ㌱ ⓒ ธｘںㄦ Ŵש ธㄦㄦ ╗ਙ ОŴ㌱ਙ ĠਙผשŴ ｹऑŴ㌱ਙγ㌀ħкٹ ผкŴ₡ħ㌱㈠㌱ਙこ⒕ⓒ ǲผħ㌱ кк ｹ ผħ㌱㌀ħкٹ ผкŴ₡ħ㌱㈠㌱ਙこ⒕ⓒ Ɔ㌱ਙשש кਙ γผħ₡ ｹкਙ γผħ₡ ㌀ผ⇡ħкש Ŵ㈠㌱ਙこ⒕ⓒ Ｃこ שผħ㌀кਙ㌱γŴ㈠㌱ਙこ

Ġħ Ḛ שⓒĠ ผ ƥ ʉγŴש ● ผ ㌱ ħٹ ₡ ⑾ผਙこ γש ⑾ਙк Ŵש A╗╗㈠ ● ʉħк к ⑾ਙккਙʉ ऑ ʉħשγ γש שผՁħ Ŵ₡ Ћ ผħ▷ਙ ⑾ਙк Ŵ ʉ ккⓒ ⇡ש ●שγħʉ

γŴٹ

ਙผ Ŵʉ

ผ㈠Ա שⓒİħこ


İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ｹ㈾Ŵこ㌱γŴ₡₡ħ㌱㌀こŴħк㈠㌱ਙこ⒕ Û ₡ⓒ Ｃ㌱ ɱⓒ ธｘںㄦ Ŵש ں ОҜ╗ਙ फĠǲЌＣǲŐƆḶЌⓒ AՁՁǲЌफ ｹŴγ

ں

ՙɱฎ㌀Ŵשש

㈠㌱ਙこ⒕

Ġħ Aкк

ⓒ● Ŵこ ऑผ ऑŴผħ Ŵ ผ ऑਙ к שש ผ ⑾ਙผ γש ħש ਙ⑾ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵ ОкŴħ ㈠ÛγŴ

ש

ħ ਙผ ㈾ਙ⇡ ऑਙħש

ħਙש

ħש

к

Ŵש

A╗╗ ⑾ਙผ こ ผ

㌱ਙผ₡ Ŵ₡ ผ

⑾

ผ

㌱ ﹒

╗γŴ ħ Ŵ₡

ٹ

Ŵ㌱

ⓒİħこ∵Ợਙש ₡ ש ゥש γħ₡₡ べ

ĠǲЌＣǲŐƆḶЌⓒ AՁՁǲЌ ｹŴγںՙɱฎ㌀Ŵשש㈠㌱ਙこ⒕ Û ₡ⓒ Ｃ㌱ ɱⓒ ธｘںㄦ Ŵש ںㅡɱ О╗ਙ İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ｹ㈾Ŵこ㌱γŴ₡₡ħ㌱㌀こŴħк㈠㌱ਙこ⒕

İŴこ ⓒ

●ɸこ Ŵ ਙこ⇡ਙ ╗

㌱γ ʉħש

γ A╗ ╗ ħ⇡

ผ ╗ผŴこħħਙⓒ こ㈾ਙ⇡ ħש

ਙ ऑผਙש

㌱ש

ש

γ

кਙف

γŴк ң⇡

ผ ⇡Ŵ㌱⇡ਙ

ש

ʉਙผ

⑾ผਙこ ₡ŴこŴف

㈠ Ɔਙש

γ

ผ Ќ

Ŵ₡Ŵ ħ ここŴħ кਙ㌱Ŵש

ħਙ ⇡ש

● Ŵкਙ ʉħкк γ

кऑ ਙש

ʉħש

γ ऑŴผש

ਙ⑾ Aผħ▷ਙŴ Ŵ₡ Ŵкħ⑾ਙผħŴ

Ŵ ₡ ₡㈠

Aкк Ġ ₡ ผਙ

ՙｘธ ՙ″ฎں ฎɱ

A╗ ╗ ħ⇡ ผ ╗ผŴこħħਙ

ผਙこ İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ ∵こŴħкשਙ ㈾Ŵこ㌱γŴ₡₡ħ㌱㌀こŴħк㈠㌱ਙこべ

Ɔ

Û ₡ ₡Ŵⓒ Ｃ㌱こ⇡ ผ ｘɱⓒ ธｘںㄦ ОҜں

╗ਙ ĠǲЌＣǲŐƆḶЌⓒ AՁՁǲЌƆ⇡㈾

㌱ Ő ₡ ผŴк İשħ㌱ ╗ਙʉ ผ⊿ ㅡธɱㅡ⊿ ОŴкこ ╗ผשｘՙ ㄦ″ฎฎ⊿ О ผこħں ʉħשγ ŐŴħ ₡ ОкŴש ผ


ฎ ħこкए ㄦ ฎฎ⇡ฎฎ ㄦㄦ″ｘㅡ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ

″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218



゜ธ

゜

″ⓒ ธ ｘこŴħк ОŴкこ Ợ

ħਙש

ОŴفשऑ ゜゜こŴħк㈠فਙਙк ㈠㌱ਙこ゜こŴħк゜﹒ħएธف ħएฎ⑾㌱⑾ฎ

ｘɱ″שħ ʉएऑٹ ㌱Ŵשएİこкए ㄦธ₡

ՙ㌱ ŴŴ ｘｘ⇡ՙ ħこкए ㄦｘɱ⑾ Ŵ ⇡″⑾⑾ㄦㅡ⇡ ħこкए ㄦｘ Ŵฎｘฎ₡ธ₡″ธ

₡

İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ｹ㈾Ŵこ㌱γŴ₡₡ħ㌱㌀こŴħк㈠㌱ਙこ

ОŴкこ Ợ ħਙ ㄦこ Ŵ

İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ｹ㈾Ŵこ

㌱γŴ₡₡ħ㌱㌀

こŴħк㈠㌱ਙこ⒕ ╗γⓒ

⇡ ⓒ ธｘ

″ Ŵ

ธ ｘ О╗ਙ ОŴкこ ธｘｹผਙ⇡ħਙこ㌀㌱㈠ผ㈠ ₡⒕

Ġħ ҜՁ⁸Ġਙʉ Ŵผ

ਙ﹒

● γŴٹ Ŵ ऑŴкこ ٹ ħਙ ⑾ਙผ ਙ⁸ ● γŴ׀ Ŵ ħ Ŵ ħਙ ʉγ ผ ● γŴٹ ਙ ㌱ผ Ŵ Ŵ ऑਙ ħŴк ऑкŴ ผ ⑾ਙผ Ŵ こħħここ ธㅡफ Ա╗Ġ Оγਙ ħゥ ₡Ŵ㌱ кħ⑾ ผŴ㈠ ╗γħ ऑкŴ ผ こ γਙк₡ Ŵкк γ ⑾кк ผਙʉ ऑŴкこƥ ʉ ħ γ ⓒ ऑк ਙħк こ ₡ħŴ Ŵ₡゜ਙผ ЌḶ╗ Ŵккਙʉ ผਙਙ ऑ ผŴ ħਙ ⇡ кਙʉ ħ ⊿ ⑾ਙผ ħ ħ ਙħ ਙٹ ผ Ŵ ㄦｘો Ŵผ ਙк₡ ผผŴ ㌱ਙ Ŵ ㌱ਙ₡ħ ㈠

ÛγŴ ʉਙк₡ ⇡ ਙผ ゥऑ ผ ਙऑħħਙ ਙ γ こħħここ ₡ħこ ħਙ ӧ₡ ऑ γ Ṳ ʉħ₡ γỏ ⑾ਙผ γħऑкŴ ผ ਙ γਙк₡ Ŵ⑾кк ผਙʉ ऑŴкこⓒ ਙ ऑऑਙผ Ŵ γ Ŵк γ ผਙਙ こ Ŵ₡ ਙ γŴٹ ħ ㌱ਙਙ ħ ਙผ ゥ ผ こ γ Ŵ ﹒ ԱŴħ㌱Ŵкк ⓒ ● Ŵこ㌱ਙħ₡ ผħ ₡ ħ ħ Ŵ फऑਙ

फ

こ ਙ ⇡

ऑкŴ㌱

₡ ਙ ٹ

ผ γħ ㌱ਙ₡ħ

㈠

╗γŴ ħ Ŵ₡ٹŴ㌱ Ŵ₡ ● γਙऑ Ŵкк ħ ʉ кк㈠Ա

ⓒ

İħこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱⊿ ҜՁAⓒ ЌЋ ŐՁA ՙㄦ ⓒ ՁAŐԱ ″ธ ⓒ AƆՁAⓒ Aккħ ₡ A●A İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ Aਙ㌱ħŴ ⓒ ՁՁ ՙｘธ ㅡɱɱ ｘՙㄦธ ╗ ՙｘธ ɱ″ ՙɱｘ″ ʉʉʉ㈠㈾㌱ŴкŴ㈠㌱ਙこʉʉʉ㈠

γ

こ

ਙ⑾

Ŵこħ

㈠㌱ਙこ

Ок Ŵ Ќਙ

╗γ ผŴこħ

Ŵкⓒ Ŵ

Ŵ㌱γこ

ӧỏ Ŵ₡ ₡ ħ ʉਙผ ħ㌱к₡ ₡ γ ผ ħ Ŵผ ㌱ਙऑผħ γ



γ ผʉħ ħ₡ħ㌱Ŵ ₡ ਙผ ਙ⇡ٹħਙ ⑾ผਙこ ħ Ŵ ผ ⓒ γ ħ⑾ਙผこŴ ħਙ ħ γħผŴこħ Ŵк ħ ㌱ਙ⑾ħ₡ ħŴк Ŵ₡ ħ ħ ₡ ₡ ਙк к ⑾ਙผ γ ਙ⑾ γ ħ₡ħٹħ₡Ŵкӧỏ Ŵこ ₡ Ŵ⇡ਙٹ ㈠ ●⑾

ਙⓒ γ ผ Ŵ₡ ผ ਙ⑾ γħ こ Ŵ Ŵผ ਙ γ ħ ₡ ₡ ผ ㌱ħऑħ ⓒ ਙ Ŵผ γ ผ ⇡ ਙ ħ⑾ħ ₡ γŴ Ŵ ₡ħ こħŴ ħਙⓒ ₡ħ ผħ⇡ ħਙⓒ ㌱ਙऑ ħ ਙผ ⑾ਙผʉŴผ₡ħ ਙ⑾ γħ

ผŴこħ Ŵк ħ ผħ㌱ к ऑผਙγħ⇡ħ ₡㈠ ●⑾ ਙ γŴٹ ผ ㌱ ħٹ ₡ γħ ผŴこħ Ŵк ħ ผผਙผⓒ ऑк Ŵ Ŵ₡ٹħ γ ₡ ผ ħここ ₡ħŴ к Ŵ₡ ₡ ผਙ γ Ŵ㌱㌱ਙこऑŴħ


ҜŴผħ㌱ Ձ Őਙ⇡ħਙ ｹผਙ⇡ħਙこ㌀㌱㈠ผ㈠ ₡⒕ Ɔⓒ ⇡ ㅡⓒ ธｘ ″ Ŵ ″

ɱ О╗ਙ İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ｹ㈾Ŵこ㌱γŴ₡₡ħ㌱㌀こŴħк㈠㌱ਙこ⒕

Ḛħ こ Ŵ ㌱Ŵкк к שɸ Ŵкש ՙｘธ ธ″ ｘㄦธ

Ҝ Ձ Őਙ⇡ħਙ

Ⓢħٹ ผħ ਙ⑾ Ќ ٹŴ₡Ŵ ਙਙऑ ǲゥ

Ɔऑ

㌱ħŴкħ

゜Aਙ㌱ħŴ

Оผਙ⑾

ਙผ

ÛŴ

ผ゜ǲٹ

ħผਙこ

Ŵк Ġਙผ

ħ㌱к

ผ

⇡ ħこкए ㄦｘ ฎｘฎ₡ธ₡″ธｘㅡ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ

″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218



゜ธ

゜


ħਙש

ОŴفשऑ ゜゜こŴħк㈠فਙਙк ㈠㌱ਙこ゜こŴħк゜﹒ħएธف ħएฎ⑾㌱⑾ฎ



₡

ՙｘธ ธㄦՙ ㄦㄦธɱ

Ŵゥｘธ ธธธ ｘｘ

ǲこŴħк ผਙ⇡ħਙこк㌀ผ㈠

₡

ฎｘㄦｘ ОŴผŴ₡ħ Ő₡

ՁŴ Ћ Ŵ ЌЋ ฎɱ ธ

ผਙこ

İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ ∵こŴħкשਙ ㈾Ŵこ㌱γŴ₡₡ħ㌱㌀こŴħк㈠㌱ਙこべƆ ╗γผ₡Ŵⓒ ⇡ผŴผ ںں ⓒ ธｘں″ ں ธｘㅡ ОҜ╗ਙ ҜŴผħ㌱ Ձ Őਙ⇡ħਙ ｹผਙ⇡ħਙこ㌀㌱㈠ผ㈠ ₡⒕Ɔ⇡㈾㌱ ОŴкこ Ợ שħਙ

Ġħ ҜՁ⁸

Ġਙʉ Ŵผ ਙ﹒

● γŴٹ Ŵ ऑŴкこ ٹ ħਙ ⑾ਙผ ਙ⁸ ● γŴ׀ Ŵ ħ Ŵ ħਙ ʉγ ผ ● γŴٹ ਙ ㌱ผ Ŵ Ŵ ऑਙ ħŴк ऑкŴ ผ ⑾ਙผ Ŵ こħħここ ธㅡफ Ա╗Ġ Оγਙ ħゥ ₡Ŵ㌱ кħ⑾ ผŴ㈠ ╗γħ ऑкŴ ผ こ γਙк₡ Ŵкк γ ⑾кк ผਙʉ ऑŴкこƥ ʉ ħ γ ⓒ ऑк ਙħк こ ₡ħŴ Ŵ₡゜ਙผ ЌḶ╗ Ŵккਙʉ ผਙਙ

ऑ

ผŴ

ħਙ ⇡

кਙʉ ħ

⊿ ⑾ਙผ ħ ħ

ਙħ

ਙ ٹ

ผ Ŵ ㄦｘો

Ŵผ ਙк₡ ผผŴ ㌱ਙ

Ŵ ㌱ਙ₡ħ

㈠

ÛγŴ ʉਙк₡ ⇡ ਙผ ゥऑ ผ ਙऑħħਙ ਙ γ こħħここ ₡ħこ ħਙ ӧ₡ ऑ γ Ṳ ʉħ₡ γỏ ⑾ਙผ γħऑкŴ ผ ਙ γਙк₡ Ŵ⑾кк ผਙʉ ऑŴкこⓒ ਙ ऑऑਙผ Ŵ γ Ŵк γ ผਙਙ こ Ŵ₡ ਙ γŴٹ ħ ㌱ਙਙ ħ ਙผ ゥ ผ こ γ Ŵ ﹒ ԱŴħ㌱Ŵкк ⓒ ● Ŵこ㌱ਙħ₡ ผħ ₡ ħ ħ

Ŵ फऑਙ फ こ ਙ ⇡ ऑкŴ㌱ ₡ ਙٹ ผ γħ ㌱ਙ₡ħ ㈠

╗γŴ ħ Ŵ₡ٹŴ㌱ Ŵ₡ ● γਙऑ Ŵкк ħ ʉ кк㈠

Ա ⓒ


İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ Aਙ㌱ħŴ ⓒ ՁՁ

ՙｘธ ㅡɱɱ ｘՙㄦธ ╗

ՙｘธ ɱ″ ՙɱｘ″

ʉʉʉ㈠㈾㌱ŴкŴ㈠㌱ਙこ∵ ㈾㌱ŴкŴ㈠㌱ਙこべ

ʉʉʉ㈠

γ

こ

ਙ⑾

Ŵこħ

㈠㌱ਙこ∵

γ

こ

ਙ⑾

Ŵこħ

㈠㌱ਙこべ


ธ゜

″

ОŐİ

″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218



゜ธ

゜


ħਙש

ОŴف שऑ ゜゜こŴħк㈠فਙਙк ㈠㌱ਙこ゜こŴħк゜﹒ħएธف ħएฎ⑾㌱⑾ฎ



₡

Ок Ŵ Ќਙ ╗γ ผŴこħ Ŵкⓒ Ŵ Ŵ㌱γこ ӧỏ Ŵ₡ ₡ ħ ʉਙผ ħ㌱к₡ ₡ γ ผ ħ Ŵผ ㌱ਙऑผħ γ ਙ⑾ İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ Aਙ㌱ħŴ ⓒ ՁՁ㈠ Ⓢк ਙ γ ผʉħ

ħ₡ħ㌱Ŵ

₡ ਙผ ਙ⇡ٹ


Ŵ

ผ

ⓒ γ

ħ⑾ਙผこŴ

ħਙ ħ γħผŴこħ


ħŴк Ŵ₡ ħ ħ

₡

₡ ਙк

к ⑾ਙผ γ

ਙ⑾ γ

ħ₡ħٹ

ħ₡Ŵкӧỏ Ŵこ

₡ Ŵ⇡ਙ ٹ

㈠ ●⑾



ผŴこħ


İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ｹ㈾Ŵこ㌱γŴ₡₡ħ㌱㌀こŴħк㈠㌱ਙこ⒕ ผħⓒ ⇡ ɱⓒ ธｘ ″ Ŵ ㅡ A

╗ਙ ҜŴผħ㌱ Ձ Őਙ⇡ħਙ ｹผਙ⇡ħਙこ㌀㌱㈠ผ㈠ ₡⒕

Ġħ ҜՁⓒ ╗γŴ ⑾ਙผ Ŵħ

γ

ħこ

Ŵ₡ ㌱γŴ

ħ

ʉħ

γ こ

Ŵผкħ

ผ γħʉ

㈠

● ㈾

ʉŴ

㌱ਙ⑾ħผこ ʉħ

γ ਙ Ŵ₡ ผ

Ŵ

γ

⑾ਙккਙʉħ

⑾ผਙこ ਙผ ऑγਙ

₡ħ㌱ħਙ Ŵ⇡ਙ

ऑкŴ

ħ

Оγਙ ħゥ ₡Ŵ㌱ кħ⑾ ผŴफҜ

₡㈾ਙਙкफ ऑŴкこ ħ ŴऑкŴ

ผ ħ

Ŵ

ħਙ㈠Ｃ γ ऑŴкこ кਙ㌱Ŵ ħਙӧỏ Ŵкħ こ ʉħ γ ₡ħผ ㌱ ʉ ผ ਙкŴผ ゥऑਙผ ⓒ ħ ħ ผ ㌱ਙここ ₡ γŴ γ こħħここ ऑкŴ ผ

ħ▷ ⇡ ㄦƥ ʉħ₡ γ ⇡ ㅡफ ㄦƥ ₡ ऑ γ㈠ธ㈠ ╗γ ʉ ħ γ ਙ⑾ γ ऑŴкこ Ŵ こŴ ผħ ʉħкк ⇡ ਙٹ ผ ธｘⓒｘｘｘ к⇡㈠

㈠ Ŵ₡ Ŵк γਙ γ ਙ

ผŴкк ㌱ਙħ₡ ผ ₡ ਙ ⇡ γŴٹħ Ŵ ħٹŴħٹ ผਙਙ こⓒ γ ผਙਙ ħ こ ਙ⑾ γ ऑŴкこ ʉħкк

ਙ Ŵħผ Ŵऑ ħ γ ਙħк こŴ ผħゥ Ŵ₡ Ŵผ кħ к ਙऑ ผŴ Ŵ ผผŴ ㌱ਙ Ŵ ㌱ਙ₡ħ こ γŴ ʉਙк₡ кŴ ₡ħผ ㌱ к ⇡ кਙʉγ こ㈠

╗γŴ Ŵ ŴкʉŴⓒ Ŵ₡ ● кਙਙ ⑾ਙผʉŴผ₡ ਙ ħ Ŵ Ŵ AƆՁA к㌱γ ਙ ʉγ ● ㌱Ŵ ゥ ⑾ħ₡ γ ħこ㈠Ա ⓒ İħこ∵Ợਙ ₡ ゥ γħ₡₡ べ

∵Ợਙ ₡ ゥ γħ₡₡ べ


ʉʉʉ㈠ γ こ ਙ⑾ Ŵこħ ㈠㌱ਙこ


ħ₡ħ㌱Ŵ

₡ ਙผ ਙ⇡ٹ


Ŵ

ผ

ⓒ γ

ħ⑾ਙผこŴ



ħŴк Ŵ₡ ħ ħ

₡

₡ ਙк

к ⑾ਙผ γ

ਙ⑾ γ

ħ₡ħٹ


₡ Ŵ⇡ਙ ٹ

㈠ ●⑾

ਙⓒ γ

ผ

Ŵ₡

ผ ਙ⑾ γħ こ

Ŵ

Ŵผ

ਙ

γ

ħ

₡

₡ ผ

㌱ħऑħ

ⓒ ਙ Ŵผ

γ

ผ

⇡ ਙ

ħ⑾ħ

₡ γŴ

Ŵ ₡ħ

こħŴ

ħਙⓒ ₡ħ

ผħ⇡

ħਙⓒ ㌱ਙऑ ħ

ਙผ ⑾ਙผʉŴผ₡ħ

ਙ⑾ γħ



ҜŴผħ㌱ Ձ Őਙ⇡ħਙ ｹผਙ⇡ħਙこ㌀㌱㈠ผ㈠ ₡⒕ Ҝਙⓒ ⇡ ธธⓒ ธｘ ″ Ŵ ɱ ㅡ A╗ਙ İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ｹ㈾Ŵこ㌱γŴ₡₡ħ㌱㌀こŴħк㈠㌱ਙこ⒕

ਙ γŴٹ ħ ㌱ਙผผ ㌱ ҜՁ

ผਙここ A₡ผਙħ₡ ऑγਙ ਙ ╗ Ҝਙ⇡ħк ㈠ ╗γ ⑾ħผ Ŵ ħਙʉħ₡ ㅡḚ ʉਙผ㈠


İŴこ γŴ₡₡ħ㌱ｹ㈾Ŵこ㌱γŴ₡₡ħ㌱㌀こŴħк㈠㌱ਙこ⒕ Ҝਙⓒ ⇡ ธธⓒ ธｘ

″ Ŵ

ㅡ

A╗ਙ ǲผħ㌱ кк ｹ ผħ㌱㌀ħкٹ ผкŴ₡ħ㌱㈠㌱ਙこ⒕

Ġħ ǲผħ㌱ⓒ ÛγŴ ħ γ ऑ₡Ŵ ਙ⑾ γ İ╗ƥ ऑŴкこ ŴผħŴ㌱㈠ٹ ĠŴٹ ਙ γ Ŵผ₡ Ŵ γħ ﹒ ÛγŴ Ŵ㌱ ħਙ γਙк₡ ʉ Ŵ ﹒ A ਙ ㌱Ŵ ҜՁ ㌱ਙ⑾ħผここ ਙऑħħਙ Ŵ₡ ● к Ŵผ ₡ ਙこ γħ ʉ⊿ ऑŴкこ ผਙਙ ʉħкк ਙ Ŵħผ Ŵऑⓒ ਙ γਙ ㌱ਙ₡ħ ʉħкк ⇡ ħ ㈾ ਙऑŴผ₡⁸İħこ∵Ợਙ ₡ ゥ γħ₡₡ べ

∵Ợਙ

₡ ゥ

γħ₡₡

べ


ธ゜

″

ОŐİ

″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218



゜ธ

゜


ħਙש

ОŴف ㅡשऑ ゜゜こŴħк㈠فਙਙ

к ㈠㌱ਙこ゜こŴħк゜﹒ħएธف ħएฎ⑾㌱⑾ฎ



₡


ʉʉʉ㈠ γ こ ਙ⑾ Ŵこħ ㈠㌱ਙこ


ħ₡ħ㌱Ŵ

₡ ਙผ ਙ⇡ٹ


Ŵ

ผ

ⓒ γ

ħ⑾ਙผこŴ



ħŴк Ŵ₡ ħ ħ

₡

₡ ਙк

к ⑾ਙผ γ

ਙ⑾ γ

ħ₡ħٹ


₡ Ŵ⇡ਙ ٹ

㈠ ●⑾





ธ゜

″

ОŐİ

″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218





ｘㅡ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218



ｘㅡ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218



ｘㅡ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218



ｘㅡ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218



ｘㅡ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218



ｘㅡ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218



ｘㅡ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218



ｘㅡ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218



ｘㅡ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ฎㅡՙ

SDR-64218



ｘㅡ゜

ธ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ฎㅡՙSDR-64218








SUBJECT:VAC-64120 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS

VEGAS - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate a portion of Moonlight Drive

north of Charleston Boulevard, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-64109]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 7/20/2016






2. Conditions and Staff Report

3. Supporting Documentation

4. Photo(s)5. Justification Letter







VAC-64120 [PRJ-64109]

SS




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

VAC-64120 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **


NOTICES MAILED 1

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0





VAC-64120 [PRJ-64109]

SS



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The City is petitioning to vacate an eight-foot wide portion of Moonlight Drive north of

Charleston Boulevard on behalf of the adjacent property owner, who would lose a portion of

frontage as a result of the city’s plans to widen Charleston Boulevard. If approved, the

additional eight feet that would accrue to the adjacent owner would offset the loss of propertyalong Charleston Boulevard.

ISSUES

The City must acquire portions of private property for intersection widening at CharlestonBoulevard and Lamb Boulevard. The widening will affect the subject property.

If approved, the east side of the Moonlight Drive right-of-way would be reduced to 17.5 feet;however, it would allow the adjacent property owner to gain property to compensate for the

loss of frontage along Charleston Boulevard.

ANALYSIS

As a result of the requested vacation, the east half of Moonlight Drive would be reduced from25.5 feet to 17.5 feet adjacent to APN 140-31-803-001. The area to be vacated includes a five-

foot sidewalk, a streetlight and three feet of curbing and pavement. Moonlight Drive is a minor

residential street that would not be affected by the loss of width. There would be no loss ofaccess to any parcel along Moonlight Drive. By vacating this portion of the street, both the City

and the adjacent property owner would benefit, since the owner will have the opportunity to

create additional parking spaces near the street frontage while the City will be able to improveCharleston Boulevard without causing significant loss of value to the adjacent property.

Currently, the existing uses on the adjacent site require 18 parking spaces; 19 spaces are being

provided. The additional property that would accrue to the owner as a result of the vacation

could possibly provide enough spaces for a drive aisle and an additional row of angled parking.

FINDINGS

We present the following information concerning this request to vacate certain public street ROW:



VAC-64120 [PRJ-64109]

SS



A. Does this vacation request result in uniform or non-uniform right-of-way widths? It

will result in a non-uniform right-of-way width, as the width of Moonlight Drive will be

reduced to 41 feet adjacent to APN 140-31-803-001.

B. From a traffic handling viewpoint will this vacation request result in a reduced

traffic handling capability? No, since it is a residential street and the area of right-of-way that will be affected will only be approximately 108.25 feet.

C. Does it appear that the vacation request involves only excess right-of-way? No it is

to “reimburse” the adjacent land owner for the loss of land that will be bought for aCity of Las Vegas capital improvement project.

D. Does this vacation request coincide with development plans of the adjacent parcels?

Yes, the Charleston Boulevard/Lamb Boulevard project.

E. Does this vacation request eliminate public street access to any abutting parcel? No.

F. Does this vacation request result in a conflict with any existing City requirements?

No.

G. Does the Department of Public Works have an objection to this vacation request?

No.



05/22/63

The Board of Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0083-63) from R-1

(Single Family Residential) to R-3 (Multiple Family Residence) on theadjacent site as part of a larger request. The Planning Commission and staff


07/21/76

The Board of Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0034-76) from R-3

(Multiple Family Residence) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on the adjacent

site as part of a larger request. The request included a plot plan for a retailcenter and gas station. The Planning Commission and staff recommended

approval.

05/27/81

A four-lot Parcel Map at the northwest corner of Charleston Boulevard andLamb Boulevard was recorded. This map identified the east half of

Moonlight Drive as 25.5 feet wide and the north half of Charleston Boulevard

as 50 feet wide.



VAC-64120 [PRJ-64109]

SS




There are no relevant building permits or business licenses.





F ield Check

05/05/16

The east side of Moonlight Drive is fully improved with a sidewalk and

streetlight standard. The adjacent corner lot contains a Financial Institution,Specified and General Retail Store. There are no parking spaces currently

striped that face the Charleston Boulevard frontage.



ｘㅡ゜

゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡ ｘɱ

VAC-64120



ｘㅡ゜

゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡ ｘɱ

VAC-64120



ｘㅡ゜

゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡ ｘɱ

VAC-64120



V A C - 6 4 1 2 0 [ P R J - 6 4 1 0 9 ] - V A C A T I O N - A P P L I C A N T / O W N E R : C I T Y O F L A S V E G A S

O N M O O N L I G H T D R I

V E N O R T H O F C H A R L E S T O N B O

U L E V A R D

0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6



ｘㅡ゜

゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡ ｘɱ

VAC-64120








SUBJECT:VAC-64290 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER:

PRECEDENT PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Petition to

Vacate a three-foot wide fire hydrant, sewer line, street lighting and appurtenances easementgenerally located on the south side of Donald Road, west of Decatur Boulevard, Ward 6 (Ross)








BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location and Aerial Maps2. Conditions and Staff Report

3. Supporting Documentation4. Photo(s)5. Justification Letter







VAC-64290 [PRJ-64277]

SS




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: PRECEDENT

PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL


** NOTIFICATION **


NOTICES MAILED 4

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



VAC-64290 [PRJ-64277]

SS

Conditions Page One


** CONDITIONS **

VAC-64290 CONDITIONS

1. The limits of this Petition of Vacation shall be the fire hydrant, sewer line, street lighting

and appurtenances easement granted by OR:952:764251, OR:952:764252 and

OR:952:764254.


Department of Public Works prior to the recordation of the Order of Vacation for this

application. Appropriate drainage easements shall be reserved if recommended by theapproved Drainage Plan/Study. The drainage study required by TMP-63580 may be used

to satisfy this requirement provided that it addresses the area to be vacated.

3. All public improvements, if any, adjacent to and in conflict with this vacation application

are to be modified, as necessary, at the applicant's expense prior to the recordation of an

Order of Vacation.

4. All development shall be in conformance with code requirements and design standards of

all City Departments.

5. The Order of Vacation shall not be recorded until all of the conditions of approval have been met provided, however, the conditions requiring modification of public improvements

may be fulfilled for purposes of recordation by providing sufficient security for the performance thereof in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Las

Vegas. City Staff is empowered to modify this application if necessary because of

technical concerns or because of other related review actions as long as current City right-of-way requirements are still complied with and the intent of the vacation application is not

changed. If applicable, a five foot wide easement for public streetlight and fire hydrant

purposes shall be retained on all vacation actions abutting public street corridors that will

remain dedicated and available for public use. Also, if applicable and where needed, publiceasement corridors and sight visibility or other easements that would/should cross any

right-of-way being vacated must be retained.

6. If the Order of Vacation is not recorded within one (1) year after approval by the City ofLas Vegas or an Extension of Time is not granted by the Planning Director, then approval

will terminate and a new petition must be submitted.



VAC-64290 [PRJ-64277]

SS



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is petitioning to vacate a three-foot wide fire hydrant, sewer line, street lighting

and appurtenances easement on the south side of Donald Road, west of Decatur Boulevard.

ANALYSIS

The parcels on which the easement is located are undeveloped; a tentative map has been

approved for a 31-lot single-family residential development in this area, but no lots have beenrecorded. A new single-family residential development with 57 lots has been proposed, but has

not yet been approved. Once developed, the easement would no longer be needed in thislocation. This Vacation request should be sent to all the utilities; however, as no right-of-way is

proposed to be vacated, and thus no franchise rights are involved, it is not necessary to wait for

responses from any of the public utilities.

FINDINGS

The Department of Public Works has no objection to the vacation application request to vacate a

fire hydrant, sewer line, street lighting and appurtenances easement generally located on thesouth side of Donald Road, west of Decatur Boulevard.


Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, F ir e, Bldg., etc.

06/07/06

The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA-

12234) to change the land use designation from ML (Medium Low Density

Residential) to L (Low Density Residential) on 12.9 acres adjacent to the

north side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 450 feet west of Decatur

Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-12235) from R-E

(Residence Estates) and R-E under Resolution of Intent to R-PD3 (Residential

Planned Development – 3 Units per Acre) to R-1 (Single Family Residential)on 12.9 acres adjacent to the north side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 450

feet west of Decatur Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff




VAC-64290 [PRJ-64277]

SS





for Private Streets in conjunction with a proposed 64-lot single familyresidential development adjacent to the north side of Dorrell Lane,approximately 450 feet west of Decatur Boulevard. The Planning

Commission and staff recommended approval.

07/27/06


14244) for a 64-lot single family residential subdivision on 12.90 acresadjacent to the north side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 450 feet west of

Decatur Boulevard. Staff recommended approval. The map expired 07/27/08.

06/04/08

The City Council approved approved a request for an Extension of Time

(EOT-27873) for the for the previously approved Special Use Permit (SUP-

12705) for private streets in conjunction with a proposed 64-lot single family

residential development adjacent to the north side of Dorrell Lane,approximately 450 feet west of Decatur Boulevard. Staff recommended

approval of the request. The approval expired 06/07/10.

The City Council approved approved a request for an Extension of Time(EOT-27874) for the previously approved Rezoning (ZON-12235) from R-E

(Residence Estates) to R-1 (Single Family Residential) on 12.9 acres adjacent

to the north side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 450 feet west of Decatur

Boulevard. Staff recommended approval of the request. The subject parcelswere hard zoned to R-1 (Single Family Residential) through Ordinance 6046

on 07/01/09.

06/26/08


28062) for a proposed 64-lot single-family residential subdivision on 12.90acres adjacent to the north side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 450 feet westof Decatur Boulevard. Staff recommended approval of the request. The

approval expired 06/26/12.

03/12/13

The Planning Commission struck from the agenda a request for a Variance(VAR-48169) to allow a minimum lot width of 60 feet where 65 feet isrequired, to allow a 10-foot front yard setback on Lots 1, 10 and 11 where 20

feet is required and to allow a 10-foot corner side yard setback on Lots 1, 24,

25 and 31 where 15 feet is required on 7.40 acres adjacent to the north side of

Dorrell Lane, approximately 420 feet west of Decatur Boulevard. Staffrecommended denial of the request.

The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map (TMP-48166) for a 31-lot single family residential subdivision on 7.40 acres

adjacent to the north side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 420 feet west ofDecatur Boulevard. Staff recommended denial of the request. The approval

expires 03/12/17.



VAC-64290 [PRJ-64277]

SS




04/12/16

The Planning Commission voted to abey to the 05/10/16 Planning

Commission Meeting at the applicant’s request a request for a Variance(VAR-63577) to allow no amenity zone where such is required for a proposed

subdivision on 11.86 acres adjacent to the north side of Dorrell Lane,approximately 425 feet west of Decatur Boulevard. Staff recommended

denial.

The Planning Commission voted to abey to the 05/10/16 Planning

Commission Meeting at the applicant’s request a request for a Waiver (WVR-

63579) to allow a 154-foot external intersection offset where 220 feet is theminimum distance separation required and to allow no interior streetlights

where such are required for a proposed residential subdivision on 11.86 acres

adjacent to the north side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 425 feet west of

Decatur Boulevard. Staff recommended denial.The Planning Commission voted to abey to the 05/10/16 Planning

Commission Meeting at the applicant’s request a request for a Tentative Map

(TMP-63580) for a 57-lot single family residential subdivision on 11.86 acres

adjacent to the north side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 425 feet west ofDecatur Boulevard. Staff recommended denial.

05/10/16

The Planning Commission voted to abey VAR-63577, WVR-63579 and

TMP-63580 to the 06/14/16 Planning Commission meeting at the applicant’s

request.

Related Building Permits/Business L icensesThere are no related building permits or business licenses.




A neighborhood meeting is not required for this request, nor was one held. However, a meeting

was organized and held by the applicant regarding the related single-family residential

subdivision on 05/03/16. The property owners and citizens in attendance strongly opposed the proposed residential development on the basis of density, traffic safety and preservation of rural

neighborhoods.

F ield Check

05/05/16 The south side of Donald Road west of Decatur Boulevard is undeveloped.



ｘㅡ゜

ฎ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธՙՙ

VAC-64290



ｘㅡ゜

ฎ゜

″


VAC-64290



ｘㅡ゜

ฎ゜

″


VAC-64290



ｘㅡ゜

ฎ゜

″


VAC-64290



ｘㅡ゜

ฎ゜

″


VAC-64290





ｘ ㅡ ゜ ฎ ゜ ″

О Ő İ ″ ㅡ ธ ՙ ՙ

V A C

6 4 2 9 0



ｘ ㅡ ゜

ฎ ゜

″

О Ő İ ″ ㅡ ธ ՙ ՙ



V A C -

6 4 2 9 0 [ P R J -

6 4 2

7 7 ] -

V A C A T I O N

- A P P L I C A N T : D R H O R T O N

- O W N E R : P R E C E

D E N T P R O P E R T I E S ,

L L C ,

E T A L

S O U T H S I D E O F D O N

A L D R O A D ,

W E S T O F D E C A T U R

B O U L E V A R D

0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6



ｘㅡ゜

ฎ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธՙՙVAC-64290








SUBJECT:VAC-64394 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: WILLIAM LYON

HOMES, INC. - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate a 60-foot wide public

drainage easement generally located west of Coke Street, south of Alder Glen Avenue (MultipleAPNs), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64393]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.






RECOMMENDATION:



2. Conditions and Staff Report3. Supporting Documentation

4. Photo(s)5. Justification Letter







VAC-64394 [PRJ-64393]

SS




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: WILLIAM LYON HOMES, INC.


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL


** NOTIFICATION **


NOTICES MAILED 1

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



VAC-64394 [PRJ-64393]

SS

Conditions Page One


** CONDITIONS **

VAC-64394 CONDITIONS

1. The limits of this Petition of Vacation shall be the Public Drainage Easement granted by

Document #900423:0504.

2. All public improvements, if any, adjacent to and in conflict with this vacation application

are to be modified, as necessary, at the applicant's expense prior to the recordation of an

Order of Vacation.

3. All development shall be in conformance with code requirements and design standards of

all City Departments.

4. If the Order of Vacation is not recorded within one (1) year after approval by the City of

Las Vegas or an Extension of Time is not granted by the Planning Director, then approval

will terminate and a new petition must be submitted.

5. The Order of Vacation shall not be recorded until all of the conditions of approval have

been met provided, however, the conditions requiring modification of public improvements

may be fulfilled for purposes of recordation by providing sufficient security for the

performance thereof in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of LasVegas. City Staff is empowered to modify this application if necessary because of

technical concerns or because of other related review actions as long as current City right-of-way requirements are still complied with and the intent of the vacation application is not

changed. If applicable, a five foot wide easement for public streetlight and fire hydrant

purposes shall be retained on all vacation actions abutting public street corridors that willremain dedicated and available for public use. Also, if applicable and where needed, public

easement corridors and sight visibility or other easements that would/should cross any

right-of-way being vacated must be retained.



VAC-64394 [PRJ-64393]

SS



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is petitioning to vacate a 60-foot wide public drainage easement on parcels located

west of Coke Street and south of Alder Glen Avenue.

ISSUES

The existing easement was granted to Clark County prior to annexation of the underlying property. The rights to this easement have been transferred to the City of Las Vegas.

Two building permits have been issued for single-family dwellings over a portion of the areato be vacated.

ANALYSIS

Following annexation, a single-family residential development and subdivision were approved

over the subject parcels. Construction of homes has begun, and the easement cannot remain

underneath private development. Lots 8, 9, 11, 12, 21, 22 and 36 of the existing subdivision are

affected. New easements were granted with recordation of the Horse and Coke Final Map on06/19/15. The existing public drainage easement is therefore no longer needed in this location.

This Vacation request should be sent to all the utilities; however, as no right of way is proposedto be vacated, and thus no franchise rights are involved, it is not necessary to wait for responses

from any of the public utilities.

FINDINGS

The Department of Public Works has no objection to the vacation application request to vacate a

public drainage easement generally located north of Racel Street, west of Coke Street.



VAC-64394 [PRJ-64393]

SS





01/21/04The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (ANX-3103) 4.80 acres at thesouthwest corner of Horse Drive and Coke Street. The annexation became

effective 01/30/04.

02/09/06

The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (ANX-11001) 15.99 acres on

the west side of Coke Street, north of Racel Street. The annexation becameeffective 04/28/06.

04/18/07The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-13850) public rights-of-way generally located west of the intersection of Horse Drive and Coke

Street. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.

08/01/07

The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-13854) from U (Undeveloped)

[RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation) General Plan Designation] underResolution of Intent to R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development – 2 Units

per Acre) to (Residential Planned Development – 2 Units per Acre) on 24.80

acres at the southwest corner of Horse Drive and Coke Street. The PlanningCommission recommended approval; staff recommended denial.

The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-13853) to allow zero squarefeet of open space where 35,293 square feet are required for a proposed 49-lot

residential subdivision on 24.80 acres at the southwest corner of Horse Drive

and Coke Street. The Planning Commission recommended approval; staffrecommended denial.

The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-13852)

for a 49-lot single family residential development on 24.80 acres at thesouthwest corner of Horse Drive and Coke Street. The Planning Commissionrecommended approval; staff recommended denial.

08/19/09

The City Council approved an Extension of Time (EOT-35064) of an

approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-13852) for a 49-lot single

family residential development on 24.80 acres at the southwest corner ofHorse Drive and Coke Street. Staff recommended approval.

04/06/11



family residential development on 24.80 acres at the southwest corner of

Horse Drive and Coke Street. Staff recommended approval.

07/12/11

The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-41623) for a 49-

lot single family residential subdivision on 24.80 acres at the southwest cornerof Horse Drive and Coke Street. Staff recommended approval.

10/02/13



family residential development on 24.80 acres at the southwest corner ofHorse Drive and Coke Street. Staff recommended denial.



VAC-64394 [PRJ-64393]

SS




01/15/14

Department of Planning staff administratively approved a Minor Amendment

(SDR-52465) of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-13852) toadd eight floor plans, increase the perimeter landscape buffers along theentrance area and the east perimeter, add architectural enhancements to

building elevations, to change the perimeter wall design, to decrease the

drainage and emergency access easement west of Painted Pony Avenue from

30 feet to 25 feet in width and for minor lot size adjustments on Lots 21through 37 and Lots 43 through 49 on 24.80 acres at the southwest corner of

Horse Drive and Coke Street.

06/19/15

A Final Map (FMP-55886) for a 49-lot single family residential subdivision

on 23.88 acres on the west side of Coke Street, approximately 215 feet northof Racel Street, was recorded.

09/08/15

The Planning Commission approved a Major Amendment (SDR-60341) of anapproved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-13852) to add three model

home floor plans with elevations and establish development standards forAccessory Structures (Class II) on 24.80 acres on the west side of Coke

Street, approximately 210 feet north of Racel Street. Staff recommended

approval.


12/02/15

A building permit (305161) was issued for a single-family residential

dwelling at 8350 Agave Bloom Street. A final inspection has not been

completed.

A building permit (305162) was issued for a single-family residentialdwelling at 8342 Agave Bloom Street. A final inspection has not been

completed.



Neighborhood MeetingA neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.

F ield Check

05/05/16The area to be vacated is located between two residential dwellings underconstruction.



ｘㅡ゜ธՙ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡɱ

VAC-64394



ｘㅡ゜ธՙ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡɱ

VAC-64394



ｘㅡ゜ธՙ゜ ″

ОŐİ ″ㅡɱ

VAC-64394



ｘㅡ゜ธՙ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡɱ

VAC-64394



ｘㅡ゜ธՙ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡɱ

VAC-64394



ｘㅡ゜ธՙ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡɱ

VAC-64394



ｘㅡ゜ธՙ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡɱ

VAC-64394



V A C - 6 4 3 9 4 [ P R J - 6 4 3 9 3 ] - V A C A T I O N - A P P L I C A N T / O W N E R : W I L L I A M

L Y O N H O M E S , I N C .

W E S T O F C O K E S T R E

E T , S O U T H O F A L D E R G L E N A V

E N U E

0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6



V A C - 6 4 3 9 4 [ P R J - 6 4 3 9 3 ] - V A C A T I O N - A P P L I C A N T / O W N E R : W I L L I A M

L Y O N H O M E S , I N C .

W E S T O F C O K E S T R E

E T , S O U T H O F A L D E R G L E N A V

E N U E

0 5 / 0 5 / 1 6



ｘㅡ゜ธՙ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡɱ

VAC-64394








SUBJECT:ABEYANCE - GPA-63571 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING -

APPLICANT/OWNER: JOHN M. BAILEY - For possible action on a request for a General Plan

Amendment FROM: DR (DESERT RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: GC (GENERALCOMMERCIAL) on 1.05 acres at 5455 North Rainbow Boulevard (APN 125-35-101-005),

Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-63423]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 7/20/2016




RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends DENIAL


2. Conditions and Staff Report - GPA-63571, ZON-63573, VAR-63817, VAR-63891, SUP-63574 and SDR-63575 [PRJ-63423]

3. Supporting Documentation - GPA-63571, ZON-63573, VAR-63817, VAR-63891, SUP-63574 and SDR-63575 [PRJ-63423]4. Photo(s) - GPA-63571, ZON-63573, VAR-63817, VAR-63891, SUP-63574, SUP-64653 and

SDR-63575 [PRJ-63423]

5. Justification Letter - GPA-63571, ZON-63573, VAR-63817, VAR-63891, SUP-63574 andSDR-63575 [PRJ-63423]

6. Protest/Support Postcards for GPA-63571 and ZON-63573 [PRJ-63423]

7. Support Letters for GPA-63571, ZON-63573, VAR-63817, VAR-63891, SUP-63574 and

SDR-63575 [PRJ-63423]







GPA-63571, ZON-63573, VAR-63817, VAR-63891, SUP-63574, SUP-64653 and SDR-63575

[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: JOHN M. BAILEY


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

GPA-63571 Staff recommends DENIAL.

ZON-63573 Staff recommends DENIAL. GPA-63571

VAR-63817 Staff recommends DENIAL. GPA-63571

ZON-63573

VAR-63891 Staff recommends DENIAL. GPA-63571

ZON-63573

VAR-63817

SUP-63574 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to

conditions:GPA-63571

ZON-63573

VAR-63817

VAR-63891


conditions:GPA-63571

ZON-63573

VAR-63817

VAR-63891

SDR-63575 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject toconditions:

GPA-63571

ZON-63573

VAR-63817

VAR-63891

SUP-63574 or

SUP-64653

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 28 - GPA-63571, ZON-63573,

VAR-63817, SUP-63574, SUP-64653

and SDR-63575

34 - VAR-63891




[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG

Conditions Page Two


NOTICES MAILED 325 - GPA-63571 and ZON-63573

325 - VAR-63817 and VAR-63891

325 - SUP-63574 and SDR-63575325 - SUP-64653

APPROVALS 3 - GPA-63571 and ZON-63573

4 - VAR-63817 and VAR-63891

4 - SUP-63574 and SDR-63575

0 - SUP-64653

PROTESTS 6 - GPA-63571 and ZON-63573

6 - VAR-63817 and VAR-638916 - SUP-63574 and SDR-63575

0 - SUP-64653

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-63817 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval, if any, for General Plan

Amendment (GPA-63571), Rezoning (ZON-63573), Special Use Permit (SUP-63574) and

Site Development Plan Review (SDR-63575) shall be required, if approved.



3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be completed in

compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department of Building andSafety.


for building permit.






[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG




Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval, if any, for General PlanAmendment (GPA-63571), Rezoning (ZON-63573), Special Use Permit (SUP-63574) and

Site Development Plan Review (SDR-63575) shall be required, if approved.










Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Delivery and

Service Vehicle Storage use.

2. Approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA-63571) and Rezoning (ZON-63573) shall be

required.

3. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-63817),

Variance (VAR-63891) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-63575) shall be

required.




[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG

Conditions Page Four



pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time may be filed for









Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Building

Maintenance Service and Sales use.

2. Approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA-63571) and Rezoning (ZON-63573) shall berequired.

3. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-63817),Variance (VAR-63891) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-63575) shall be

required.


pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time may be filed for



Safety.



7. The on-site service, maintenance or clean-out of the street sweepers is prohibited.




[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG

Conditions Page Five




SDR-63575 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA-63571) and Rezoning (ZON-63573) shall berequired.

2. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-63817),Variance (VAR-63891) and Special Use Permit (SUP-63574) shall be required.



4. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan and landscape plan, datestamped 05/16/16, except as amended by conditions herein.

5. A Waiver from Title 19.08.080 Table 4 is hereby approved, to allow a five-foot wide

landscape buffer along the north perimeter and a portion of the south perimeter, whereminimum eight-foot wide landscape buffer is required.

6. An Exception from Title 19.08.110 C.12 is hereby approved, to allow zero trees in the parking lot where eight trees are required.


Safety.



9. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, LandscapeArchitect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at the same

time application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground sprinkler system

is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory manner; the landscape

plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed landscaping shall not impede visibilityof any traffic control device.




[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG

Conditions Page Six




11. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be satisfied,except as modified herein.

Publi c Works

12. Correct all American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies accessing this site on

Rainbow Boulevard in accordance with code requirements of Title 13.56.040 to the

satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with development of this site. “Pan” style

driveways may be used as long as current ADA requirements are met and appropriatePublic Pedestrian Access Easements are granted. All existing paving damaged or removed

by this development shall be restored at its original location and to its original width


13. Abandon the existing temporary Individual Septic Disposal System (ISDS) per Southern

Nevada Health District (SNHD) regulations and connect to the public sewer systemconcurrent with development of this site.

14. All landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and

maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at all

development access drives and abutting street intersections.

15. Meet with the Flood Control Section of the Department of Public Works for assistance withestablishing finished floor elevations and drainage paths for this site prior to submittal of

construction plans, the issuance of any building or grading permits, whichever may occur

first. Provide and improve all drainage ways as recommended.




[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting to convert an existing R-E (Residence Estates) zoned property within

the R-PO (Rural Preservation Overlay) into a General Commercial property to allow a Delivery

and Service Vehicle Storage Use located at 5455 North Rainbow Boulevard. The property to thenorth was recently rezoned to a C-1 (Limited Commercial) zone and is located on the southeast

corner of Rainbow Boulevard and Ann Road. This is also a less intense commercial use than

what is being proposed. The property to the south of the request is zoned R-E (Residence

Estates) and is also located within the R-PO (Rural Preservation Overlay). The properties to theeast and west of the subject site are single-family detached zoned properties. This is an

inappropriate request that if approved, would change the development pattern along RainbowBoulevard from a residential pattern to a commercial pattern. Staff does not support these

applications and recommends denial. If denied, the property would remain as a single-family,

detached property.

At the direction of the Planning Commission at the June 14, 2016 meeting, the Department

accepted an alternate Special Use Permit (SUP-64653) for consideration requesting a Building

Maintenance Service and Sales use. The applicant suggests that it is a more appropriatedescription of the proposed use and that the sweeper vehicles to be stored at the site should be

considered to be outside storage. As such, the General Plan Amendment and Rezoning neededwould be less intense than what is needed for the Delivery and Service Vehicle Storage use, with

the requests being changed to SC (Service Commercial) and C-1 (Limited Commercial),respectively. The requested Variances and Waiver would remain unchanged. Although the

changed General Plan Amendment and Rezoning requests are more appropriate for the area, staff

determined that the Delivery and Service Vehicle Storage use was the most appropriate usedescription and does not support the new application for Special Use Permit (SUP-64653).

ISSUES

A Variance is required to allow a 13-foot rear yard setback where 20 feet is required foran existing building and to allow a five-foot side yard setback where 10 feet is required

for a proposed carport. Staff does not support this request.

A Variance is required to allow a 17-foot Residential Adjacency setback for an existing

building where 65 feet is required. Staff does not support this request.

A Special Use Permit is required to allow a Delivery and Service Vehicle Storage Use.

Staff does not support this request. Alternatively, a Special Use Permit is required to

allow a Building Maintenance Service and Sales Use. Staff does not support this request.




[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG



A Waiver is required for a five-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer along the north and

a portion of south perimeters. Staff does not support this request.

An Exception is required to provide zero parking lot landscape trees, where eight trees

are required. Staff does not support this request.

ANALYSIS

This project consists of six application requests: General Plan Amendment, Rezoning, two

Variances, Special Use Permit and a Site Development Plan Review with Waivers andExceptions. This property is currently a single-family residence in an R-E (Residence Estates)

zone parcel within the R-PO (Rural Preservation Overlay). This request would remove this

parcel from the overlay and allow the parcel to be utilized as an intense commercial property

under the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district. As a result of the increased intensity of theuse proposed and the need for the Variances, Waivers and Exceptions required, staff does not

support this project.

The applicant is requesting to change the General Plan from DR (Desert Rural Density

Residential) to: GC (General Commercial). This is not an appropriate land use for this location.

The property to the north, located at the southeast corner of Rainbow Boulevard and Ann Road,

was recently changed from DR (Desert Rural Density Residential) to SC (Service Commercial).This is a less intense commercial land use than what is being proposed with this project. There

are residential zoned properties on the east, south and west of the site, making the requested

intensity of the proposed commercial land use less desirable. This section of RainbowBoulevard has an overall development pattern of residential uses and to change one parcel in the

middle of the block to GC (General Commercial) would allow for the creation of spot zoning

that goes against basic planning principles for community development. Staff does not support

this land use reclassification request.

The Zoning request from R-E (Residence Estates) to C-2 (General Commercial) would create a

spot zoning situation. In addition, it would allow the most intense commercial development permitted by the City of Las Vegas in the middle of a primarily residential block. This is not

appropriate and would change the future development pattern of this section of Rainbow

Boulevard into a commercial corridor, which was not planned. In addition, there are currently

undeveloped commercially zoned properties located in the northwest portion of the City that

would meet the needs of this applicant. Staff does not support this rezoning request.

The proposal is to convert an existing single family, detached residence into a commercial property for a Delivery and Service Vehicle Storage Use for a street/parking lot sweeper

business. The applicant has provided photographs of the size and type of commercial vehicles

proposed to be stored on the site that can be found in the supporting back-up information. TheDelivery and Service Vehicle Storage Use is defined as; “The use of an area or facility for the

parking and storage of commercial fleet vehicles that are used primarily in connection with the




[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG



delivery of goods and services to the surrounding community.” The proposed use meets the

definition as reflected in the justification letter provided.


1. All areas used for the parking and storage of vehicles shall be paved, and shall be

effectively screened so as not to be visible from adjoining properties or public rights-of-

way.

The proposed use meets this requirement as the vehicles will be parked in the covered

parking areas provide in the rear of the property and screened by a six-foot high solid

wall.

2. Lighting shall be shielded from adjacent properties.

The proposed use meets this requirement as no new lighting is being proposed.

3.

The use shall not occupy or interfere with any parking spaces that are required for any

other existing or proposed areas for which required parking is or will be provided on the

site.

The proposed use meets this requirement as no other use is proposed on the site

4. No repair or servicing of vehicles or storage or warehousing of goods or merchandise is

allowed.

The applicant indicates that no repair or servicing of vehicles will take place and no storage or warehousing of goods or merchandise is being proposed. The applicant has

also indicated that they contract the servicing of the vehicles to an outside company

located off-site.

A Special Use Permit is required to allow the Delivery and Service Vehicle Storage Use on the

property and is not supported by staff. This use would be more appropriate located away from

single family zoned property and certainly not directly adjacent to an R-E (Residence Estates)zoned property within the R-PO (Rural Preservation Overlay) area.

At the direction of the Planning Commission at the June 14, 2016 meeting, the Department

accepted an alternate Special Use Permit (SUP-64653) for consideration requesting a BuildingMaintenance Service and Sales use. The applicant suggests that it is a more appropriate

description of the proposed use and that the sweeper vehicles to be stored at the site should be

considered to be equipment, and therefore outside storage, which could be approved in the C-1




[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG



zoning district via the Special Use Permit. As such, the General Plan Amendment and Rezoning

needed would be less intense than what is needed for the Delivery and Service Vehicle Storage

use, with the requests being changed to SC (Service Commercial) and C-1 (LimitedCommercial), respectively. The requested Variances and Waiver would remain unchanged.

Although the changed General Plan Amendment and Rezoning requests are more appropriate for

the area, staff determined that the Delivery and Service Vehicle Storage use was the mostappropriate use description for the on-site retention of the street sweeper vehicles, as it is defined

as “the use of an area or facility for the parking and storage of commercial fleet vehicles that are

used primarily in connection with the delivery of goods and services to the surrounding

community.” The street sweepers are commercial fleet vehicles that are dispatched to providethe service of sweeping and cleaning parking lots, meeting the definition. Staff does not support

the new application for Special Use Permit (SUP-64653). If approved, the use would be subject

to the restrictions of the use as denoted in Title 19.12, including the requirements for outdoor

storage and the limitation of no more than 10% of total lot area used for storage. In addition, acondition has been added to prohibit the on-site service, maintenance or clean-out of the street

sweepers.

A Variance is required to allow an existing building to not meet the rear yard setback

requirements and a proposed carport to not meet the side yard setback requirements of the

proposed C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district. Although an argument could be made thatthe first part of this request is an existing condition and therefore not a self-created hardship, this

argument cannot be made for the proposed carport. The proposed carport is clearly a self-created

hardship and therefore does not meet the standard for allowing the Variance. Staff does not

support this request.

A second Variance is required to allow an existing building to not meet the Residential

Adjacency Standards for a proposed commercial property that is located next to an R-E(Residence Estates) zoned property. The purpose of this requirement is to protect adjacent single

family zoned properties from commercial development. The conversion of this single family

dwelling into a commercial property requires the building to meet the Residential Adjacency

Standards of a three to one setback; which in this case requires a 65-foot setback where only 17feet is being provided. Staff does not support this request.

The applicant is planning on maintaining the property’s residential appearance as much as

possible. The exterior of the house will remain unchanged, as well as the storage building on the

northeast section of the parcel. It is worth highlighting the fact that these buildings are notaesthetically compatible. While the house has a wood and stucco appearance, the rear building

has a metal appearance. The color pallet does not match either, with the primary structure being painted a light tan with a blue-grey roof and the storage building being painted green with white

trim. Nor would it prevent the owner from tearing down these structures in the future and

building a modern commercial building.




[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG



Landscape along the perimeters will be enhanced to screen the proposed commercial property

from the adjacent residential properties. The northern most driveway of the three existingdriveways, off Rainbow Boulevard, will be removed. The two remaining driveways will be

brought up to current code required widths and be paved. The paving will continue throughout

the new parking lot along the north and rear of the property. Two new carport structures will beadded, one along the north perimeter and the other just east of the existing house, in the rear yard

area of the property. Two accessible parking spaces will be located in front of the house. The

existing pool will be removed in order to enlarge the parking area.

The applicant is requesting a Waiver for this project. It would allow a five-foot wide landscape

buffer along the north perimeter and portions of the south perimeter. The south perimeter is

adjacent to an existing R-E (Residence Estates) property. Tthese requests are self-created by the

applicant, as there is ample room on the site for these requirements to be met. Staff does notsupport the requests.

The applicant has also requested an Exception for parking lot landscape requirements. A treeand five shrubs are required at the end of each row of uncovered parking spaces. The applicant

is not providing any new landscaping in the parking lot where eight trees are required. Staff does

not support this request.

Although the Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD) does not govern properties with wells

permitted by the state, they have offered the following: “it is important to point out that this

property's well is for domestic use only and the property owner must obtain approval from the

State Engineer's Office before using the well for commercial purposes.”

Commercial property is required to use the City of Las Vegas sewer system. A condition has been added by Public Works Department staff to abandon the existing septic system on the

property and connect to the sewer system as a condition if the request is approved. The applicant

has been informed of this requirement.

FINDINGS (GPA-63571)

Section 19.16.030(I) of the Las Vegas Zoning Code requires that the following conditions be met

in order to justify a General Plan Amendment:

1. The density and intensity of the proposed General Plan Amendment is compatible

with the existing adjacent land use designations,

The planned GC (General Commercial) land use designation will not be compatible withthe single-family residential uses located adjacent to and near the subject site.




[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG



2. The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment will be compatible with

the existing adjacent land uses or zoning districts,

A C-2 (General Commercial) zoning designation would not be an appropriate land use for

the subject site. The surrounding area is predominantly single-family residences.According to Title 19.08.080, the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district should be

located away from low and medium density residential development or along commercial

corridors. The subject site is in the middle of a residential neighborhood street block.

3. There are adequate transportation, recreation, utility, and other facilities to

accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General Plan

Amendment; and

Rainbow Boulevard is designed as a Primary Arterial Street and may be adequate to

handle the proposed commercial development permitted by this General Plan Amendment.

4. The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and policies

that include approved neighborhood plans.

Other than the R-PO (Rural Preservation Overlay), no other plans cover this location.

FINDINGS (ZON-63573)

In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the PlanningCommission or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposal conforms to the General Plan.

The accompanying General Plan Amendment (GPA-63571) is proposing to designate the

site to the GC (General Commercial) land use category, which allows for development of

more intense retail and personal service uses. The requested zoning change to the C-2

(General Commercial) zoning district conforms to the proposed GC (General Commercial)

land use designation.

2. The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the rezoning

will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning districts.

The permitted commercial uses in a C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district wouldallow the most intense commercial uses and would be incompatible with the surrounding

residential neighborhood.




[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG

Staff Report Page Seven


3. Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or

appropriateness of the rezoning.

No evidence of the need for commercial development in this area has been provided. The

proposed intensity of the commercial uses that would be allowed with a C-2 (GeneralCommercial) zoning district are not compatible with the existing single-family residential

neighborhoods adjacent to the proposal.


size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.

The subject site has direct access to Rainbow Boulevard, a 100-foot Primary Arterial

Street as designated by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. The street providesadequate capacity to accommodate the proposal; however, the proposed commercial uses

are not compatible with the area.

FINDINGS (VAR-63817)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City Council,

in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;

2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:

“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific piece of

property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of exceptional

topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition ofthe piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation would result in

peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and undue hardships

upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict application may be granted so

as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial

detriment to the public good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resourcesand without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or

resolution.”

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the applicant

has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing to change a residential property into acommercial property that does not meet the minimum code standards. In view of the absence of




[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG



any hardships imposed by the site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant’s

hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 forgranting of Variances.





2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;

3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”


“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific piece of

property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of exceptionaltopographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition of

the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation would result in

peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and undue hardshipsupon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict application may be granted so


detriment to the public good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources

and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or

resolution.”

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the applicanthas created a self-imposed hardship by proposing to change a residential property into a

commercial property that does not meet the minimum code standards. In view of the absence of

any hardships imposed by the site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant’s

hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 forgranting of Variances.


In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning

Commission and City Council must affirm the following:







[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG

Staff Report Page Nine


This use is not appropriate at this location due to the proximity of the single family,

detached homes located adjacent to the project.


The site is large enough to handle the intensity of the land use being proposed.




Street as designated by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. The street provides

adequate capacity to accommodate the proposal; however, the proposed commercial usesare not compatible with the area.


or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the

General Plan.

With the approval of the related General Plan Amendment and Rezoning applications, this

project will be consistent with the General Plan.


The project is meeting all conditions for the proposed use.






The proposed land use is not the appropriate use of land as defined in Title 19.12. TheDelivery and Service Vehicle Storage use is the most appropriate land use designation

pursuant to Title 19.12.





[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG

Staff Report Page Ten


The site is large enough to handle the intensity of the land use being proposed.




Street as designated by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. The street provides

adequate capacity to accommodate the proposal; however, the proposed commercial uses

are not compatible with the area.



General Plan.

With the approval of the related General Plan Amendment and Rezoning applications, this

project will be consistent with the General Plan.


The project is meeting all conditions for the proposed use.

FINDINGS (SDR-63575)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the

Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and

development in the area;

This project is not compatible with adjacent residential developments. The use is intended

to be located away from single family zoned properties.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the Design

Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

This project is not consistent with current design codes as evidence by the requested two

Variances, Waiver and Exception required for this development.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or

neighborhood traffic;




[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG

Staff Report Page Eleven


Rainbow Boulevard is a 100-foot wide Primary Arterial roadway as designated by the

Master Plan of Streets and Highways and is adequate in size to handle the traffic thatwould be generated by the C-2 (General Commercial) zoned uses proposed.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

The buildings are existing structures and will not change with this project. However, the

landscaping will be greatly enhanced throughout the property and will match the existing

landscaping.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic

features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an

orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and compatiblewith development in the area;

The property is proposed to maintain the existing residential characteristics found on thesite and surrounding properties.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health, safety and

general welfare.

The applicant is required to obtain all necessary building permits and inspections and

licenses for the proposed project as required by the City of Las Vegas to ensure the public

health, safety and general welfare are secured.



05/12/64The City Council approved an Annexation (A-0003-64) that included this site

as part of a larger request.




02/24/06A building permit (#60324) was issued for Excavation only at 5455 North

Rainbow Boulevard. The permit was final on 02/28/06.

03/10/06A building permit (#60325) was issued for a pool/spa at 5455 North Rainbow

Boulevard. The permit was final on 07/21/06.




[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG

Staff Report Page Twelve



02/08/16

Staff met with the applicant and reviewed options for the applicant to convertan existing residential property into a commercial property at 5455 N.Rainbow Boulevard. The applicant is requesting a very intense commercial

development that is not appropriate at this location. It was noted that the

property is also within the Rural Preservation Overlay established to protect

the residential nature of the neighborhood.


03/22/16

Start: 6:05 End: 6:25

Attendance: 4 - Applicants,3 - City Staff,

4 – Members of the Public

The applicant made a presentation and informed the public that two Variances

have been added to the project since the notices were mailed. There were nocomments on the project from the public.

F ield Check

03/03/16Staff visited the site and found a residential property. No issues were noted atthe time of the visit.


Site Area

Net Acres 1.05

Surrounding

Property

Exi sting Land Use

Per Ti tle 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject Property Single Family,Detached

DR (Desert RuralDensity Residential)

R-E (Residence Estates)

North VacantSC (Service

Commercial)

C-1 (Limited

Commercial)

South VacantDR (Desert Rural

Density Residential)R-E (Residence Estates)




[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG

Staff Report Page Thirteen


Surrounding

Property

Ex isting Land Use

Per Ti tle 19.12

Planned or Special

Land Use Designation Exi sting Zoning Distri ct

EastSingle Family,

Detached

L (Low Density

Residential)

R-PD4 (ResidentialPlanned Development –

Four Units per Acre)

WestSingle Family,

Detached

ML (Medium Low

Density Residential)

R-1 (Single-Family

Residential)




Rural Preservation Overlay District Y


Trails Y





Pursuant to Ti tle 19.08.080, the foll owing standards apply: Standard Required/Al lowed Provided Compliance

Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 174 Feet Y

Min. Setbacks

Front

Side

Corner

Rear

10 Feet10 Feet

10 Feet

20 Feet

81 Feet5 Feet

N/A

13 Feet

Y N*

N/A

N*

Max. Lot Coverage 50 % 8.6 % Y

Trash EnclosureScreened, Gated, w/ a

Roof or TrellisScreened, Gated, w/

a Roof or TrellisY

Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y*Variance (VAR-63817) has been requested.

Residential Adjacency Standards Requi red/All owed Provided Compli ance

3:1 proximity slope 65 Feet 17 Feet N*

Adjacent development matching setback N/A N/A N/A

Trash Enclosure 50 Feet 156 Feet Y

*Variance (VAR-63891) has been requested.




[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG

Staff Report Page Fourteen


Pursuant to Ti tle 19.08, the fol lowing standards apply:

Landscaping and Open Space Standards

Standards Required Provided Compliance

Ratio Trees

Buffer Trees:

North

South

East

West

1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet




9 Trees

14 Trees

9 Trees

4 Trees

25 Trees

24 Trees

16 Trees

7 Trees

Y

Y

Y

Y

TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 36 Trees 72 Trees Y

Parking Area Trees

1 Tree / 6 Uncovered

Spaces, plus 1 tree at theend of each row of spaces 8 Trees 0 Trees N*

LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS

Min. Zone Width

North

South

East

West

8 Feet

8 Feet

8 Feet15 Feet

5 Feet

5 Feet

13 Feet18 Feet

N**

N**

YY

Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential 6 Feet Y

*An Exception has been requested. ** A Waiver has been requested.

Street Name

Functional

Classif ication of

Street(s)

Govern ing Document

Actual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliance

with Street

Section

Rainbow Boulevard Primary ArterialPlanned Streets and

Highways Map100 Y

Streetscape

Standards


Title 19.04.180

Provide a three-foot wide

amenity area at back of curband a five-foot wide sidewalk.

A five-foot wide sidewalk at back of curb. Y *

*Public Works has approved a deviation from the Complete Streets Standards as a result of

existing conditions.




[PRJ-63423]

YK/SG

Staff Report Page Fifteen


Pursuant to Titl e 19.08 and 19.12, the foll owing parking standards apply:Parki ng Requi rement

Use

Gross F loor

Area or

Number of

Units


Parking

Ratio

Parking Parking

RegularHandi-capped

RegularHandi-capped

Delivery and

ServiceVehicle

Storage

Number of

Employees of

largest shift: 7

.75 spaces

per

employee

6

Number of

Service

Vehicles onsite: 12

One space

pervehicle

12



Waivers


To Provide an eight-

foot wide perimeter

landscape buffer oninterior property lines.

To provide a five-foot wide perimeterlandscape buffer on the north and a

portion of the south perimeters.

Denial

Exceptions


To provide eight parking lot

landscape trees.

To provide zero parking lot

landscaping treesDenial



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ

GPA-63571



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ

GPA-63571



Ő ǲ Ա ǲ

A Ő Ｃ

Ḛ ● Ձ

Ա ǲ

Ő ╗

Ձ Ќ

Ա A Ձ Ɔ A Ҝ Ɔ

╗

Ḛ Ḷ Ձ

Ｃ Ա

Ő Ⓢ Ɔ Ġ

Ɔ ╗

Ձ

Ḷ Ő A Ɔ О

Ő A Ɔ ╗

Ő Ḷ Ɔ ǲ ╗ Ġ ●

ǲ ╗ Ɔ ╗

ÛĠ●╗ǲ ՁAǲƆ A Ћǲ

ŐḶƆǲ Оǲ╗AՁ A Ћǲ

Ձ Ⓢ

Ɔ ● ╗ A Ќ

Ḷ

Ɔ ╗

ŐⓈ●╗ ՁḶÛǲŐ AЋǲ

A

Ő Ќ

A ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

Ҝ ǲ A Ｃ Ḷ Û

Ɔ ╗

О Ḷ

Ő Ⓢ

О ● Ќ ǲ

Ő ● Ҝ

Ɔ ╗

Ա ● Ɔ Ġ

Ḷ О Ձ

Ḷ Û ǲ Ő

Ɔ Ɔ ╗

Ḛ Ő A İ Ⓢ Ќ ● Оǲ Ő AЋǲ

ՁḶ A● AЋǲ

ƆAŐՁǲ╗ Ɔ╗AŐ AЋǲ

Ɔ AЌ Ｃ Աǲ Ќ Ġ AЋǲ

Ḛ ǲ Ҝ ● Ќ ● Ա

Ő ● Ｃ

Ḛ ǲ Ɔ

Ɔ ╗

Ҝ AЌ Ύ AЌ ● ╗ A Ḛ Ձǲ Ќ AЋǲ

ԱŐ●AŐÛḶḶＣ ԱǲЌＣ A Ћǲ

A ╗ Ⓢ Ɔ Ġ Ḷ Ձ Ձ

Ɔ ╗

Û AЌ Ќ ŐＣ

Ќ Ő A ● Ќ Ա

Ḷ Û

Ա Ձ

Ћ Ｃ

Û Ġ AҜ Ҝ ǲ Ő ՁЌ

ḚОA ″ㄦՙ

ƆⓈԱİǲ╗

ОŐḶОǲŐ╗

㌫ŐḶҜ ＣŐ ╗Ḷ Ḛ

ＣŴ ╗γผ₡Ŵⓒ ҜŴผ㌱γ ｘں

Ḛ●Ɔ こŴऑ Ŵผ ਙผこŴкк ऑผਙ₡

ਙк ਙ こ

γ

₡ ਙ⑾ γ

Ｃ

ਙ ㌱ਙ

ħਙ ₡ٹ

кਙऑこ

γħ こŴऑ ħ ⑾ਙผ ผ

⑾

ผ

㌱

ਙ

Ḛ ਙ ผŴऑγħ㌱ ●⑾ਙผこŴשħਙ Ɔ

ОкŴħ Ｃف ٹ кਙऑこＣ

ՙｘธ ธธ ɱ ″ｘ ں

ħ Ձħこħ

ｘｘｘ⑾ Ա⑾⑾ ผں

Ɔ⇡㈾㌱ Оผਙऑ ผ

Ḛ ผŴк ОкŴ Aこ ₡こ ש

Ḷ Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱

Ɔ Ɔ ผٹħ㌱ ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

Ḛ Ḛ ผŴк ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

Ҝ Ҝ ₡ħこ

Ġ Ġħفγ

ҜՁA Ҝ ₡ħこ Ձਙʉ A Ŵ㌱γ ₡

Ձ● Ő Ձħفγ ●₡ ผħŴк Ő Ŵผ㌱γ

ОＣ ОкŴ ₡ ਙここħ Ｃ ٹ кਙऑこ

ОŐ ḶƆ ОŴผ Ő ㌱ผ Ŵ ħਙ゜Ḷऑ ƆऑŴ㌱

О О⇡кħ㌱ Ŵ㌱ħкħ

ՁЋҜＣ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵ Ҝ ₡ħ㌱ŴкفＣħ ผħ㌱

Ḛ╗ ╗ਙผħ ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

╗ ╗ਙʉ ผ

Ő Ő ਙผ㌱ ਙ ผٹŴ ħਙ

Ｃਙʉ ਙʉ ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

ҜṲⓈ Ｃਙʉ ਙʉ Ҝħゥ ₡ Ⓢ

╗ЌＣ ╗ผŴ₡ ħਙŴк Ќ ħفγ⇡ਙผγਙਙ₡

Ｃ ٹ кਙऑこ

О О⇡кħ㌱ Ŵ㌱ħкħ кŴผ ਙ

ŐЌО ŐผŴк Ќ ħفγ⇡ਙผγਙਙ₡Оผ ผٹŴ ħਙ

Őǲ ŐผŴк ǲ Ŵ

ＣŐ Ｃ ผ ŐผŴк

Ő ŐผŴк

Ձ Ձਙʉ

ҜՁ Ҝ ₡ħこ Ձਙʉ

A

Ձ● Ő

Ձħفγ ● ₡ ħŴк Ő Ŵ ㌱γ

О Ｃ

Ок こ ħ Ｃ ٹ кਙऑこ

О О ゜ ħ ゜Ḷऑ ऑŴ

О

О ⇡кħ ħ кħ

ف ħħħħħħħħ ккккккккＣħ ผħ㌱

╗ ╗ਙผħ ここ㌱ħŴк

╗ ╗ ʉ

Ő Ő ਙ ผ

Ｃਙʉ ਙʉ

ҜṲⓈ

Ｃ ʉ ਙ

╗ЌＣ

₡ħ к

Ｃ ٹ кਙ こ

О О ⇡кħ ккккккк

ｘ゜ ″゜ ″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ



Ձ A Ќ Ｃ Ɔ A О ǲ О Ձ A Ќ Ձ

㈠ｘ

Ɔ

⟨ О Ġ ㈠ ӧ ՙ ｘ ธ ỏ ″ ｘ ՙ ՙ ธ ⟨ A Ṳ ӧ ՙ ｘ ธ ỏ ㅡ ㄦｘｘㄦㄦ ⟨

ǲ Ɔ ● Ḛ Ќ ╗ Ⓢ Ｃ ● Ḷ Ｃ Ɔ ธ

⟨ ธ ธ ㄦ О ǲ Ɔ A Ő A ╗ ㈠ ⓒ Ձ A Ɔ Ћ ǲ Ḛ A Ɔ ⓒ Ќ Ћ ฎ ɱ ธ ⟨

ՙ ｘ ธ

ธ ธ ɱ

″ ″

Ŵ к к

⇡

⑾ ਙ ผ

ਙ

Ⓢ ₡

ผ Ḛ ผ ਙ ₡

ՙ ｘ ธ

ㅡ ㄦㄦ

ՙ ㄦ

Ŵ к к

⇡

⑾ ਙ ผ

ਙ

Ｃ ● Ḛ

ฎ ｘｘ

ธ ธ ՙ

ธ ″ ｘｘ

ՙ ｘ ธ

ㅡ ㄦㄦ

ՙ ㄦ ㅡ ｘ

⟨ Û Û Û ㈠ Ɔ ธ Ｃ ǲ Ɔ ● Ḛ Ќ Ɔ ╗ Ⓢ Ｃ ● Ḷ ㈠ Ḷ Ҝ ⟨

Ɔ О Ő Ḷ ǲ Ɔ Ɔ ● Ḷ Ќ A Ձ Ձ A Ќ Ｃ Ɔ A О ǲ Ｃ ǲ Ɔ ● Ḛ Ќ


Ｃ Ɔ ธ

Ġ Ћ A

ｘㄦ゜ ″ ゜ ″

О Ő İ ″ ㅡ ธ

G

P A - 6 3 5 7 1 , Z O N

- 6 3 5 7 3 , V A R 6 3 8

1 7 , V A R - 6 3 8 9 1 ,

S U P - 6 3 5 7 4 , S U

P - 6 4 6 5 3

a n d




㈠ｘ

Ɔ




ՙ ｘ ธ

ธ ธ ɱ

″ ″

Ŵ к к

⇡

⑾ ਙ ผ

ਙ

Ⓢ ₡

ผ Ḛ ผ ਙ ₡

ՙ ｘ ธ

ㅡ ㄦㄦ

ՙ ㄦ

Ŵ к к

⇡

⑾ ਙ ผ

ਙ

Ｃ ● Ḛ

ฎ ｘｘ

ธ ธ ՙ

ธ ″ ｘｘ

ՙ ｘ ธ

ㅡ ㄦㄦ

ՙ ㄦ ㅡ ｘ




Ｃ Ɔ ธ

Ġ Ћ A

ｘㄦ゜ ″ ゜ ″


G

P A - 6 3 5 7 1 , Z O N - 6 3 5 7 3 , V A R 6 3 8

1 7 , V A R - 6 3 8 9 1 ,

S U P - 6 3 5 7 4 , S U P - 6 4 6 5 3

a n d




㈠ｘ

Ɔ




ՙ ｘ ธ

ธ ธ ɱ

″ ″

Ŵ к к

⇡

⑾ ਙ ผ

ਙ

Ⓢ ₡

ผ Ḛ ผ ਙ ₡

ՙ ｘ ธ

ㅡ ㄦㄦ

ՙ ㄦ

Ŵ к к

⇡

⑾ ਙ ผ

ਙ

Ｃ ● Ḛ

ฎ ｘｘ

ธ ธ ՙ

ธ ″ ｘｘ

ՙ ｘ ธ

ㅡ ㄦㄦ

ՙ ㄦ ㅡ ｘ




Ｃ Ɔ ธ

Ġ Ћ A

ｘㄦ゜ ″ ゜ ″


G

P A - 6 3 5 7 1 , Z O N

- 6 3 5 7 3 , V A R 6 3 8

1 7 , V A R - 6 3 8 9 1 ,

S U P - 6 3 5 7 4 , S U

P - 6 4 6 5 3

a n d




㈠ｘ

Ɔ




ՙ ｘ ธ

ธ ธ ɱ

″ ″

Ŵ к к

⇡

⑾ ਙ ผ

ਙ

Ⓢ ₡

ผ Ḛ ผ ਙ ₡

ՙ ｘ ธ

ㅡ ㄦㄦ

ՙ ㄦ

Ŵ к к

⇡

⑾ ਙ ผ

ਙ

Ｃ ● Ḛ

ฎ ｘｘ

ธ ธ ՙ

ธ ″ ｘｘ

ՙ ｘ ธ

ㅡ ㄦㄦ

ՙ ㄦ ㅡ ｘ




Ｃ Ɔ ธ

Ġ Ћ A

ｘㄦ゜ ″ ゜ ″


G

P A - 6 3 5 7 1 , Z O N

- 6 3 5 7 3 , V A R 6 3 8

1 7 , V A R - 6 3 8 9 1 ,

S U P - 6 3 5 7 4 , S U

P - 6 4 6 5 3

a n d



A О к Ŵ ħ

Ｃ

к ਙ ऑ こ

Ɔ

ผ ħ ㌱

ਙ ผ ऑ ਙ ผ Ŵ ħ ਙ

⇡ ผ Ŵ ผ ธ ｘ

″

Ա Ŵ ħ к

Ɔ

ผ

Ɔ ʉ

ऑ

ผ

A

Ő Ŵ ħ ⇡ ਙ ʉ

ǲ к

Ŵ ħ ਙ ǲ ゥ γ ħ ⇡ ħ

ӧ Ġ ਙ

ỏ

Û

ǲ

к Ŵ ħ ਙ

ǲ Ŵ

ǲ к Ŵ ħ ਙ

Ќ ਙ ผ γ ǲ к

ٹ

Ŵ ħ ਙ

Ɔ ਙ γ

ǲ к

ٹ

Ŵ ħ ਙ

Ŵ

к Ŵ ਙ

ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


G P A - 6 3 5 7 1 , Z O N

- 6 3 5 7 3 , V A R - 6 3

8 7 1 , V A R - 6 3 8 9 1

, S U P - 6 3 5 7 4

a n

d

S D R - 6 3 5 7 5



A О к Ŵ ħ

Ｃ

к ਙ ऑ こ

Ɔ

ผ ħ ㌱


⇡ ผ Ŵ ผ ธ ｘ

″

Ա Ŵ ħ к

Ɔ ผ

Ɔ ʉ

ऑ ผ

A

Ő Ŵ ħ ⇡

ਙ ʉ

ǲ к Ŵ ħ ਙ ǲ ゥ γ ħ ⇡ ħ

ӧ Ḛ Ŵ ผ Ŵ

ỏ

Û

ǲ

к Ŵ ħ ਙ

Ɔ ਙ γ ǲ Ŵ

ǲ к Ŵ ħ ਙ

ǲ Ŵ

ǲ к Ŵ ħ ਙ

Ќ ਙ ผ γ ǲ Ŵ

ǲ к Ŵ ħ ਙ

γ ǲ Ŵ ǲ к Ŵ ħ ਙ

ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


G

P A - 6 3 5 7 1 , Z O N

- 6 3 5 7 3 , V A R - 6 3

8 7 1 , V A R - 6 3 8 9 1

, S U P - 6 3 5 7 4

a n

d

S D R - 6 3 5 7 5



A О к Ŵ ħ

Ｃ

к ਙ ऑ こ

Ɔ

ผ ħ ㌱


İ Ŵ

Ŵ ผ

ธ ｘ

″

A

Ő Ŵ ħ ⇡ ਙ ʉ Ɔ

ʉ

ऑ

ผ

╗ ผ

㌱ О γ ਙ ਙ ǲ ゥ γ ħ ⇡ ħ

ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


G P A - 6 3 5 7 1 , Z O N

- 6 3 5 7 3 , V A R - 6 3

8 7 1 , V A R - 6 3 8 9 1

, S U P - 6 3 5 7 4

a n

d

S D R - 6 3 5 7 5



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


G

P A 6 3 5 7 1

Z O N

6 3 5 7 3

V A R 6 3

8 7 1

V A R 6 3 8 9 1

S U P 6 3 5 7 4

d

S D R 6 3 5 7 5



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


G

P A 6 3 5 7 1

Z O N

6 3 5 7 3

V A R 6 3

8 7 1

V A R 6 3 8 9 1

S U P 6 3 5 7 4

a n d

S D R 6 3 5 7 5



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


G

P A 6 3 5 7 1

Z O N

6 3 5 7 3

V A R 6 3

8 7 1

V A R 6 3 8 9 1

S U P 6 3 5 7 4

d

S D R 6 3 5 7 5





╗ผ㌱ㄦ

ธｘｘ″ ●▷ ЌОŐ ՙ ≠ɸՁ ゥ ɸÛ ゥ ɸ ≠Ġ

Ћ●Ќ İAՁԱㅡԱ

″ㅡ″ՙｘธธㄦธ

╗ผ㌱ ″

ธｘｘ″ ●▷ ЌОŐ ՙ ≠ɸՁ ゥ ɸÛ ゥ ≠ɸĠ

Ћ●Ќ İAՁԱㅡԱ

″ՙ″ՙｘธｘฎㅡｘ

ｘ゜

″゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ

GPA-63571, ZON-63573, VAR-63871, VAR-63891, SUP-63574 and SDR-63



╗ผ㌱ ɱ

ธｘｘฎ ḚҜ ĠＣธㄦｘｘ ՙɸՁ ゥ ɸÛ ゥ ″ ≠ɸĠ

Ћ●Ќ ḚԱĠธㅡธฎǲธ

ㅡฎ″

╗ผ㌱ ธｘ

ธｘｘՙ ḚҜ Ûㅡㄦｘｘ ฎɸՁ ゥ ɸÛ ゥ ฎɸĠ

Ћ●Ќ İฎＣㅡԱ

″″ՙՙｘｘɱｘฎฎ

ｘ゜

″゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ




╗ผ㌱ ธ ธｘ ธ ●▷ ЌОŐ ฎɸՁ ゥ ɸÛ ゥ ฎɸĠ

Ћ●Ќ ㄦㅡＣԱㅡÛ

ԱՙƆฎｘㅡ

ㄦㅡ

╗ผ㌱ ธธ ธｘ

ㅡ ●▷ ЌỢ ธｘɸՁ ゥ ≠ɸ Û ゥ ฎɸĠ

Ћ●Ќ ḚԱΎḚɱǲ

ㄦ

ธฎ

ｘ゜

″゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ




╗ผ㌱ ธ ธｘ ㅡ γ ٹผਙк ש Ɔħкٹ ผŴ₡ਙ ㄦｘｘ ″ɸՁ ゥ ɸÛ ゥ ″ ≠ɸĠ

Ћ●Ќ ḚЌОǲĠㅡΎธՙ″ㄦՙㄦ

кŴ Ŵ

ธｘ

ㅡ γٹ

Ɔħкٹ

ผŴ₡ਙ ĠＣธㄦｘｘ ธɸՁ ゥ ≠ɸÛ ゥ ฎ ≠ɸĠ

Ћ●Ќ ḚԱΎḚɱǲ

ㄦ

ธฎ

ｘ゜

″゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ




╗ผ㌱ ՙ

ธｘｘՙ ḚҜ Ûㅡㄦｘｘ ฎɸՁ ゥ ɸÛ ゥ ฎɸĠ


″Ṳՙՙｘ

ｘՙｘｘ

╗ผ㌱ ฎ ธｘｘՙ ḚҜ Ûㅡㄦｘｘ ฎɸՁ ゥ ɸÛ ゥ ฎɸĠ


″ㅡՙՙｘｘㄦㅡ″

ｘ゜

″゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ




G P A - 6 3 5 7 1 [ P R J - 6 3 4

2 3 ] - G E N E R A L P L A N

A M E N D M

E N T

R E L A T E D

T O

Z O N - 6 3 5 7 3 , V A R - 6 3 8 1 7 , V A R -

6 3 8 9 1 , S U P - 6 3 5 7 4 , S

U P - 6 4 6 5 3 A N D S D R - 6 3 5 7 5 - A P P L I C A N T / O W N E R : J O H N M . B A

I L E Y

5 4 5 5 N O R T H R A I N B O

W B

O U L E V A R D

0 3 / 0 3 / 1 6



G P A - 6 3 5 7 1 [ P R J - 6 3 4

2 3 ] - G E N E R A L P L A N

A M E N D M

E N T

R E L A T E D

T O

Z O N - 6 3 5 7 3 , V A R - 6 3 8 1 7 , V A R -

6 3 8 9 1 , S U P - 6 3 5 7 4 , S


I L E Y

5 4 5 5 N O R T H R A I N B O

W B

O U L E V A R D

0 3 / 0 3 / 1 6



G P A - 6 3 5 7 1 [ P R J - 6 3 4

2 3 ] - G E N E R A L P L A N

A M E N D M

E N T

R E L A T E D

T O

Z O N - 6 3 5 7 3 , V A R - 6 3 8 1 7 , V A R -

6 3 8 9 1 , S U P - 6 3 5 7 4 , S


I L E Y

5 4 5 5 N O R T H R A I N B O

W B

O U L E V A R D

0 3 / 0 3 / 1 6



G P A - 6 3 5 7 1 [ P R J - 6 3 4

2 3 ] - G E N E R A L P L A N

A M E N D M

E N T

R E L A T E D

T O

Z O N - 6 3 5 7 3 , V A R - 6 3 8 1 7 , V A R -

6 3 8 9 1 , S U P - 6 3 5 7 4 , S


I L E Y

5 4 5 5 N O R T H R A I N B O

W B

O U L E V A R D

0 3 / 0 3 / 1 6



G P A - 6 3 5 7 1 [ P R J - 6 3 4

2 3 ] - G E N E R A L P L A N

A M E N D M

E N T

R E L A T E D

T O

Z O N - 6 3 5 7 3 , V A R - 6 3 8 1 7 , V A R -

6 3 8 9 1 , S U P - 6 3 5 7 4 , S


I L E Y

5 4 5 5 N O R T H R A I N B O

W B

O U L E V A R D

0 3 / 0 3 / 1 6



ｘㄦ゜

″゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ

GPA-63571, ZON-63573, VAR-63817, VAR-63891,

SUP-63574, SUP-64653 and SDR-63575



ｘㄦ゜

″゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ

GPA-63571, ZON-63573, VAR-63817, VAR-63891, SUP-635

SUP-64653 and SDR-63575



ｘㄦ゜

″゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ


UP-64653 and SDR-63575



ｘㄦ゜

″゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ


SUP-64653 and SDR-63575



ｘㄦ゜

″゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ


SUP-64653 and SDR-63575



ｘㄦ゜

″゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ

PA-63571, ZON-63573, VAR6-3817, VAR-63891, SUP-6357

UP-64653 and SDR-63575



ｘㄦ゜

″゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ

GPA-63571, ZON-63573, VAR-63817, VAR-63891, SUP-635SUP-64653 and SDR-63575






































SUBJECT:ABEYANCE - ZON-63573 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-63571 - PUBLIC HEARING -

APPLICANT/OWNER: JOHN M. BAILEY - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning

FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) on 1.05 acres at5455 North Rainbow Boulevard (APN 125-35-101-005), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-63423]. Staff

recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 7/20/2016




RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends DENIAL

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Consolidated Backup

2. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-63573, VAR-63817, VAR-63891, SUP-63574, SUP-64653and SDR-63575 [PRJ-63423]




Consistent with the City’s

sustainability efforts to reduce

paper use, backup

documentation pertaining to

related items will appear as

backup under the first item. This

item includes such consolidated

backup documentation. Pleaserefer to the first related

application in the subject line of

the Agenda Summary Page.







ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ

ZON-63573



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ

ZON-63573



Ő ǲ Ա ǲ

A Ő Ｃ

Ḛ ● Ձ

Ա ǲ

Ő ╗

Ձ Ќ

Ա A Ձ Ɔ A Ҝ Ɔ

╗

Ḛ Ḷ Ձ

Ｃ Ա

Ő Ⓢ Ɔ Ġ

Ɔ ╗

Ձ

Ḷ Ő A Ɔ О

Ő A Ɔ ╗

Ő Ḷ Ɔ ǲ ╗ Ġ ●

ǲ ╗ Ɔ ╗

ÛĠ●╗ǲ ՁAǲƆ A Ћǲ

ŐḶƆǲ Оǲ╗AՁ A Ћǲ

Ձ Ⓢ

Ɔ ● ╗ A Ќ

Ḷ

Ɔ ╗

ŐⓈ●╗ ՁḶÛǲŐ AЋǲ

A

Ő Ќ

A ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

Ҝ ǲ A Ｃ Ḷ Û

Ɔ ╗

О Ḷ

Ő Ⓢ

О ● Ќ ǲ

Ő ● Ҝ

Ɔ ╗

Ա ● Ɔ Ġ

Ḷ О Ձ

Ḷ Û ǲ Ő

Ɔ Ɔ ╗

Ḛ Ő A İ Ⓢ Ќ ● Оǲ Ő AЋǲ

ՁḶ A● AЋǲ

ƆAŐՁǲ╗ Ɔ╗AŐ AЋǲ

Ɔ AЌ Ｃ Աǲ Ќ Ġ AЋǲ

Ḛ ǲ Ҝ ● Ќ ● Ա

Ő ● Ｃ

Ḛ ǲ Ɔ

Ɔ ╗

Ҝ AЌ Ύ AЌ ● ╗ A Ḛ Ձǲ Ќ AЋǲ

ԱŐ●AŐÛḶḶＣ ԱǲЌＣ A Ћǲ

A ╗ Ⓢ Ɔ Ġ Ḷ Ձ Ձ

Ɔ ╗

Û AЌ Ќ ŐＣ

Ќ Ő A ● Ќ Ա

Ḷ Û

Ա Ձ

Ћ Ｃ

Û Ġ AҜ Ҝ ǲ Ő ՁЌ

ΎḶЌ ″ㄦՙ

ƆⓈԱİǲ╗

ОŐḶОǲŐ╗

㌫ŐḶҜ Ő ǲ ╗Ḷ ธ

ＣŴ ╗γผ₡Ŵⓒ ҜŴผ㌱γ ｘں

Ḛ●Ɔ こŴऑ Ŵผ ਙผこŴкк ऑผਙ₡

ਙк ਙ こ

γ

₡ ਙ⑾ γ

Ｃ

ਙ ㌱ਙ

ħਙ ₡ٹ

кਙऑこ

γħ こŴऑ ħ ⑾ਙผ ผ

⑾

ผ

㌱

ਙ

Ḛ ਙفผŴऑγħ㌱ ●⑾ਙผこŴשħਙ Ɔ

ОкŴħ Ｃف ٹ кਙऑこＣ

ՙｘธ ธธ ɱ ″ｘ ں

ħ Ձħこħ

ｘｘｘ⑾ Ա⑾⑾ ผں

Ɔ⇡㈾㌱ Оผਙऑ ผ

Ύਙħف Ő ธ Ҝ ₡ħこ ՁਙʉＣ ħ Ő ħ₡ ħŴк

Ő Ҝ ₡ħこＣ ħ Ő ħ₡ ħŴк

Ő ㅡ Ġħفγ Ｃ ħ Ő ħ₡ ħŴк

Ő ҜĠ Ҝਙ⇡ħк ゜ҜŴ⑾Ŵ㌱ ผ ₡Ġਙこ Ő ħ₡ ㌱

Ő ㄦ AऑŴผ こ

Ő ҜĠО Ő ħ₡ ħŴк Ҝਙ⇡ħк ゜ҜŴ⑾Ŵ㌱ ผ ₡ Ġਙこ ОŴผ

О Ő Оผਙ⑾ ħਙŴк Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱ Ŵ₡ ОŴผħف

О Ḷ Оผਙ⑾ ħਙŴ к Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱

Ќ Ɔ Ќ ħفγ⇡ਙผγਙਙ₡ Ɔ ผٹħ㌱

Ḷ Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱

ＣＣ ħف ₡ ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

ں Ձħこħ ₡ ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

ธ Ḛ ผŴк ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

ОԱ ОкŴ ₡ Աħ

ОŴผ

Ҝ ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк゜●₡ ผħŴк

Ҝ ●₡ ผħŴк

Ћ ħٹħ㌱

О ОкŴ ₡ ਙここħ

╗ Ｃ ╗ผŴ₡ ħ ħਙŴк Ｃ ٹ кਙऑこ

ОＣ ОкŴ ₡ Ｃ ٹ кਙऑこ

╗ ╗ਙʉ ผ

Ő ǲ Ő ħ₡ ħŴк ǲ Ŵ

Ⓢ ӧḚОA Ｃ ħفŴ ħਙỏⓈ₡ ٹ кਙऑ ₡

Ő A ŐŴ㌱γ A㌱ผ

Ő Ｃ Ɔħف к ŴこħкŐ ħ₡ ħŴк Ő ผħ㌱ ₡

Ő ОＣ Ő ħ₡ ħŴкОкŴ ₡ Ｃ ٹ кਙऑこ

Őں Ɔħف к ŴこħкŐ ħ₡ ħŴк

Ő Ձ Ɔħفк ŴこħкਙこऑŴ㌱

Ձਙ

A

О О ħ к ħ

Ќ Ќ ħفγ⇡ γ ₡ ħٹ

⑾⑾ħ

Ｃ

Ｃ ħف ₡ ħ к

ں Ձħ ħ ₡ ผ ħŴк

ธ

Ŵк ਙ ㌱ħŴк

ОԱ

Ок ₡ Աħ

О ผ

Ҝ

ħ к゜●●●

Ҝ

● ₡ ħ к

Ћ

ħٹħ㌱

О Ок ₡

╗ Ｃ

╗ Ŵ ħ ħਙ к Ｃ

ОＣ

Ок ₡ Ｃ ٹ к

╗ ╗ ʉ

ｘ゜ ″゜ ″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ








SUBJECT:ABEYANCE - VAR-63817 - VARIANCE RELATED TO GPA-63571 AND ZON-63573 -

PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JOHN M. BAILEY - For possible action on a

request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 13-FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK WHERE 20 FEETIS REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING BUILDING AND TO ALLOW A FIVE-FOOT SIDE

YARD SETBACK ON THE NORTH PERIMETER WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR A

PROPOSED CARPORT on 1.05 acres at 5455 North Rainbow Boulevard (APN 125-35-101-

005), R-E (Residence Estates) [PROPOSED: C-2 (General Commercial)] Zone, Ward 4(Anthony) [PRJ-63423]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 7/20/2016




RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:


1. Consolidated Backup2. Supporting Documentation3. Protest/Support Postcards for VAR-63817 and VAR-63891 [PRJ-63423]





paper use, backup










ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ

VAR-63817



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ

VAR-63817
















SUBJECT:ABEYANCE - VAR-63891 - VARIANCE RELATED TO GPA-63571, ZON-63573 AND

VAR-63817 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JOHN M. BAILEY - For possible

action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 17-FOOT RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCYSETBACK WHERE 60 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING BUILDING on 1.05 acres

at 5455 North Rainbow Boulevard (APN 125-35-101-005), R-E (Residence Estates)

[PROPOSED: C-2 (General Commercial)] Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-63423]. Staff

recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 7/20/2016




RECOMMENDATION:Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:







paper use, backup










ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ

VAR-63891



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ

VAR-63891








SUBJECT:ABEYANCE - SUP-63574 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO GPA-63571, ZON-63573,

VAR-63817 AND VAR-63891 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JOHN M.

BAILEY - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR DELIVERY ANDSERVICE VEHICLE STORAGE USE at 5455 North Rainbow Boulevard (APN 125-35-101-

005), R-E (Residence Estates) [PROPOSED: C-2 (General Commercial)] Zone, Ward 4

(Anthony) [PRJ-63423]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 7/20/2016





BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Consolidated Backup2. Supporting Documentation

3. Protest/Support Postcards for SUP-63574 and SDR-63575 [PRJ-63423]





paper use, backup










ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ

SUP-63574



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ

SUP-63574
















SUBJECT:SUP-64653 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO GPA-63571, ZON-63573, VAR-63817,

VAR-63891 AND SDR-63575 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JOHN M.

BAILEY - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A BUILDINGMAINTENANCE SERVICE AND SALES USE WITH OUTSIDE STORAGE at 5455 North

Rainbow Boulevard (APN 125-35-101-005), R-E (Residence Estates) [PROPOSED: C-2

(General Commercial)] Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-63423]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 7/20/2016










paper use, backup










ｘㄦ゜

″゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ

SUP-64653



ｘㄦ゜

″゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ

SUP-64653








SUBJECT:ABEYANCE - SDR-63575 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-

63571, ZON-63573, VAR-63817, VAR-63891 AND SUP-63574 - PUBLIC HEARING -

APPLICANT/OWNER: JOHN M. BAILEY - For possible action on a request for a SiteDevelopment Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 3,933 SQUARE-FOOT OFFICE AND

SERVICE VEHICLE USE WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT WIDE

LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG A PORTION OF THE NORTH PERIMETER AND A FIVE-

FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG A PORTION OF THE SOUTH PERIMETER,WHERE MINIMUM EIGHT-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ARE REQUIRED on

1.05 acres at 5455 North Rainbow Boulevard (APN 125-35-101-005), R-E (Residence Estates)

[PROPOSED: C-2 (General Commercial)] Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-63423]. Staffrecommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 7/20/2016




RECOMMENDATION:








paper use, backup










ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ

SDR-63575



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡธ

SDR-63575





PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: MAY 10, 2016



SUBJECT:ABEYANCE - VAR-63584 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR

HORTON - OWNER: R M H TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO

ALLOW A CONNECTIVITY RATIO OF 1.0 WHERE 1.3 IS REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW NO AMENITY ZONE WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL

SUBDIVISION on 1.90 acres at the northwest corner of Dorrell Lane and Decatur Boulevard

(APN 125-24-503-020), R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-63482].


C.C.: 6/15/2016





BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-63584, WVR-63585 and TMP-63586 [PRJ-63482]

2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-63584, WVR-63585 and TMP-63586 [PRJ-63482]3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-63584, WVR-63585 and TMP-63586 [PRJ-63482]4. Photo(s) - VAR-63584, WVR-63585 and TMP-63586 [PRJ-63482]

5. Justification Letter - VAR-63584, WVR-63585 and TMP-63586 [PRJ-63482]

6. Protest/Support Postcards - VAR-63854 and WVR-63585 [PRJ-63482]7. Letter of Rebuttal for VAR-63584, WVR-63585 and TMP-63586 [PRJ-63482]

8. Letter from DR Horton - VAR-63584, WVR-63585 and TMP-63586 [PRJ-63482]







VAR-63584, WVR-63585 and TMP-63586 [PRJ-63482]

JB




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: R M H TRUST


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

VAR-63584 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to

conditions:

WVR-63585 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to

conditions:

VAR-63584

TMP-63586 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject toconditions:

VAR-63584WVR-63585

** NOTFICATION **


NOTICES MAILED 274 - VAR-63584 and WVR-63585

274 - TMP-63586

APPROVALS 1 - VAR-63584 and WVR-635851 - TMP-63586

PROTESTS 2 - VAR-63584 and WVR-63585

2 - TMP-63586




JB

Conditions Page One


** CONDITIONS **


Planning




Safety.





WVR-63585 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. This approval shall be void two (2) years from the date of final approval, unless exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time may be filed for




3. A Waiver from of Title 19.02.240 to allow no street lighting along the proposed interior

private street where such is required is approved.

4. A Waiver from of Title 19.02.140 to allow a 187-foot external intersection offset where

220 feet is the minimum distance separation required is approved.




JB

Conditions Page Two







Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-63584)and Waiver (WVR-63585) shall be required, if approved.

2. Approval of the Tentative Map shall be for no more than four (4) years. If a Final Map isnot recorded on all or a portion of the area embraced by the Tentative Map with four (4)


3. Street names must be provided in accordance with the City of Las Vegas Street Namingand Address Assignment Regulations, 2009 Edition.



5. In conjunction with creation, declaration and recordation of the subject common-interestcommunity, and prior to recordation of the Covenants, Codes and Restrictions (“CC&R”),

or conveyance of any unit within the community, the Developer is required to record a

Declaration of Private Maintenance Requirements (“DPMR”) as a covenant on allassociated properties, and on behalf of all current and future property owners. The DPMR

is to include a listing of all privately owned and/or maintained infrastructure improvements,

along with assignment of maintenance responsibility for each to the common interest


description of the required level of maintenance for privately maintained components. TheDPMR must be reviewed and approved by the City of Las Vegas Department of Field

Operations prior to recordation, and must include a statement that all properties within thecommunity are subject to assessment for all associated costs should private maintenance

obligations not be met, and the City of Las Vegas be required to provide for said

maintenance. Also, the CC&R are to include a statement of obligation of compliance with

the DPMR. Following recordation, the Developer is to submit copies of the recordedDPMR and CC&R documents to the City of Las Vegas Department of Field Operations.




JB




Statutes.

Publi c Works

7. Construct half-street improvements on Dorrell Lane and Decatur Boulevard adjacent to thissite. All existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its

original location and to its original width concurrent with development of this site.

Additionally, coordinate the construction of widened pavement adjacent to Assessor Parcel

Number #125-24-503-012 between this site and the Donald & Decatur I site (TMP-63580).

8. The private street for this site must be granted as a “Public Ut ility Easement, Public Sewer

Easement, and Public Drainage Easement with private surface maintenance by the

Homeowner’s Association” on the Final Map for this site.

9. A working sanitary sewer connection shall be in place prior to final inspection of any units

within this development. Full permanent improvements on all major access streets,including all required landscaped areas between the perimeter wall and adjacent public

street, shall be constructed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any building

permits beyond 50% of all units within this development. All off-site improvementsadjacent to this site, including all required landscaped areas between the perimeter walls

and adjacent public streets, shall be constructed and accepted prior to issuance of building

permits beyond 75%. The above thresholds notwithstanding, all required improvements

shall be constructed in accordance with Title19.02.130.D.


maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at alldevelopment access drives and abutting street intersections.


Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits orsubmittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve

all drainageways recommended in the approved drainage plan/study. The developer of this

site shall be responsible to construct such neighborhood or local drainage facility

improvements as are recommended by the City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage

Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.

12. As per Unified Development Code (UDC) 19.16.060.G, all requirements must be compliedwith or such future compliance must be guaranteed by an approved performance security

method in accordance with UDC sections 19.02.130.C and 19.02.130.E.




JB










deviations.




JB



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a Tentative Map for a proposed eight-lot single-family residential

subdivision, comprised of eight residential lots and two common lots on a 1.90-acre undeveloped

site located on the northwest corner of Dorrell Lane and Decatur Boulevard, within a R-1 (SingleFamily Residential) zoning district.

In addition, the applicant has also requested a Waiver of Title 19.02 and Variance of Title 19.04

Complete Street development standards; to allow a connectivity ratio of 1.0 where 1.3 isrequired, to allow no amenity zone where such is required along Dorrell Lane and Decatur

Boulevard, to allow a 187-foot external intersection offset where 220 feet is the minimumdistance separation required and to allow no streetlights along the interior private street where

such are required. No unique or extraordinary evidence has been presented to warrant the

requested Waiver and Variance. As such, the hardship is self-imposed and; therefore, staff

recommends denial of all associated applications with this project.

ISSUES

A Waiver is required to allow no installation of streetlights along the interior private streetrequired by Title 19.02.240 development standards.

A Waiver is required to allow a 187-foot external intersection offset where 220 feet is theminimum distance separation required by Title 19.02.140 development standards.

A Variance application is required to allow a connectivity ratio of 1.0 where 1.3 is required by Title 19.04.040 development standards.

A Variance is required to allow, no amenity zone improvements along Dorrell Lane and

Decatur Boulevard, which are required by Title 19.04 development standards.

ANALYSIS

The applicant has proposed to develop the subject site into a 10-lot single-family residential

subdivision located on the northwest corner of Dorrell Lane and Decatur Boulevard, within an R-

1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district. The subject site is 1.90-acres and is currently

undeveloped.




JB



In addition, the applicant has also requested a Waiver (WVR-63585) of Title 19.02 and Variance

(VAR-63584) of Title 19.04 Complete Street development standards; to allow a connectivity

ratio of 1.0 where 1.3 is required, to allow no amenity zone where such is required along DorrellLane and Decatur Boulevard, to allow a 187-foot external intersection offset where 220 feet is

the minimum distance separation required and to allow no streetlights along the proposed interior

private street where such are required.

The existing General Plan land use designation ML (Medium Low Density Residential) has an

allowable density of 8.49 dwelling units per gross acre, which is compatible with the eight

dwellings which are proposed. The proposed lots range in size from 7,088 square feet to 9,252square feet and exceed the 60-foot minimum lot width required by code. Site access is proposed

from Shady Chestnut Court by way of a 47-foot private street that will serve this site. The

applicant has indicated on the submitted plan that six-foot perimeter screening walls and interior

screening walls will be provided between the proposed lots and surrounding the site, which will be designed in accordance with Title 19.06.060 development standards. The submitted

north/south and east/west cross section depicts maximum natural grade less than 2% across this

site. Per the Tables in Subdivision Code 19.06.050 a development with natural slope less than2%, is allowed a maximum 4-foot retaining wall. No retaining walls are shown in the cross

sections.

The Clark County School District was provided an opportunity to comment on the proposed

development. However, no comments were received that indicated either a favorable or

unfavorable review of the proposed residential project.

The City is currently working on building complete streets throughout the City. No unique orextraordinary evidence has been presented to warrant the requested Waiver and Variance. As

such, the hardship is self-imposed and; therefore, staff recommends denial of all associatedapplications with this project.




1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;



“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of exceptional




JB



topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition of





resolution.”

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the applicanthas created a self-imposed hardship by proposing to not construct the required improvements

associated with the rights-of-way within the subject site. In view of the absence of any hardships

imposed by the site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant’s hardship is

preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting ofVariances.

FINDINGS (WVR-63585)

No substantial evidence has been presented to warrant the requested Waiver of Title 19.02 toallow no streetlights along the proposed interior private street and to allow a 187-foot external

intersection offset where 220 feet is the minimum distance separation allowed, staff recommends

denial of the request with conditions.


The proposed Tentative Map conforms to Nevada Revised Statute, however the applicant has

requested a Waiver (WVR-63584) of Title 19.02.240 and Variance (VAR-63585) of Title

19.04.220 Complete Street development standards to allow a connectivity ratio of 1.0 where 1.3

is required, to allow no amenity zone where such is required along Dorrell Lane and DecaturBoulevard, to allow a 187-foot external intersection offset where 220 feet is the minimum

distance separation required and to allow no streetlights along the proposed interior private street

where such are required. Therefore, staff recommends denial with conditions.



05/12/64

The Board of City Commissioners approved an Annexation (A-0003-64)

request of 5,000 acres generally located north of Lone Mountain Road and

west of Decatur Boulevard with an effective date of 05/20/64.




JB




01/20/16

The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-61791) from R-E

(Residence Estates) to R-1 (Single Family Residential) at the northwest cornerof Dorrell Lane and Decatur Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staffrecommended approval.

05/10/16The Planning Commission voted [4-0] to hold this item in abeyance to the

June 14, 2016 Planning Commission meeting.




There are no related Building Permits or Business Licenses associated with this property


02/23/16A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the submittalrequirements for a Waiver, Variance and Tentative Map applications; for a

proposed eight-lot residential subdivision.

Neighborhood MeetingA neighborhood meeting is not required for this type of request nor was one held.

F ield Check

03/03/16During a routine site inspection staff observed that the subject site was anundeveloped parcel of land with high weeds and shrubs.


Site Area

Net Acres 1.90

Surrounding

Property

Ex isting Land Use

Per Ti tle 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject Property UndevelopedML (Medium Low


R-1 (Single Family

Residential)




JB



Surrounding

Property

Ex isting Land Use

Per Ti tle 19.12

Planned or Special


North Single-FamilyResidential

ML (Medium LowDensity Residential)

R-E (Residence Estates)

SouthSingle-Family

Residential

ML (Medium Low



Units per Acre)

East UndevelopedPublic – North Las

Vegas

O-L (Open Land) – North

Las Vegas

West UndevelopedML (Medium Low





No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A


Trails N/A





Pur suant to Tit le 19.06.070 development standards, the foll owing standards apply:

Ex isting Zoning Permit ted Density Units Al lowed Units Provided

R-1 (Single Family

Residential)8.49 du/ac 16 8

Standard Required/Al lowed Provided ComplianceMin. Setbacks:

Front 20 Feet 20 Feet Y

Side 5 Feet 5 Feet Y

Rear 15 Feet 15 Feet Y

Corner 15 Feet 15 Feet Y

Maximum Height 35 Feet N/A N/A




JB



Street Name

Functional

Classif ication of

Street(s)

Govern ing Document

Actual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliance

with Street

SectionDecatur Boulevard Parkway Arterial

Master Plan of Streets &

Highways120 N*

Dorrell Lane Minor CollectorMaster Plan of Streets &

Highways60 N*

*See note on Streetscape Standards Table below



Internal Street 1




Intersection – Stub Terminus w/ Temporary Turn Around

Easements0


Total 1 1

Required Provided

Connectivity Ratio (L inks / Nodes): 1.30 1.00*

*The applicant has requested a Variance (VAR-63584) to allow a connectivity ratio of 1.0 where

1.3 is required by Title 19.04.040 development standards.

Pursuant to Ti tle 19.02 and 19.04, the fol lowing standards apply:


Decatur Boulevard

120-foot wide right-of-

way, including amenityzone, sidewalk and

streetlights


way with sidewalk,streetlights and no

amenity zone

N*

Dorrell Lane


way, including amenity

zone, sidewalk and

streetlights


way with sidewalk,

streetlights and no

amenity zone

N*

Shady Chestnut Court

(private street)

47-foot wide right-of-way, including amenity

zone, sidewalk and

streetlights


way, sidewalk, amenityzone and no streetlights

N*

*The applicant has a requested a Variance (VAR-63584) and Waiver (WVR-63585) to waive

Title 19.02 improvement requirements and 19.04 complete street development standards toinstall no amenity zone along Decatur Boulevard and Dorrell Lane; and no streetlights on the

proposed private drive Shady Chestnut Court which provides access to the subject site.




JB





Use

Gross F loor

Area or

Number of

Units


Parking

Ratio

Parking Parking

RegularHandi-

cappedRegular

Handi-

capped

Single-Family

Detached8 du

2 spaces

per du16





ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎธ

VAR-63584



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎธ

VAR-63584



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″

О Ő İ ″ ㅡ ฎ ธ

V A R 6 3 5 8 4

W V R 6 3 5 8 5 d

T M P 6 3 5 8 6



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


V A R 6 3 5 8 4

W V R 6 3 5 8 5

d T M P 6 3 5 8 6



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


V A R 6 3 5 8

4

W V R 6 3 5 8 5

d T M P 6 3 5 8

6



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


V A R 6 3 5 8 4

W V R 6 3 5 8 5

d T M P 6 3 5 8 6



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


V A R 6 3 5 8 4

W V R 6 3 5 8 5

d T M P 6 3 5 8 6



V A R -

6 3 5 8 4

[ P R J -

6 3 4

8 2 ] -

V A R I A N C E

R E L A T E D

T O

W V R -

6 3 5 8 5

A N D

T M P -

6 3 5 8 6

-

A P P L I C A N T : D R

H O R T O N -

O W N E R : R M

H T R U S T

N O R T H W E S T C O R N E R O F D O R R E L L L A N E A N D D E C A T U R B O U L E V A R D

0 3 / 0 3 / 1 6



V A R -

6 3 5 8 4

[ P R J -

6 3 4

8 2 ] -

V A R I A N C E

R E L A T E D

T O

W V R -

6 3 5 8 5

A N D

T M P -

6 3 5 8 6

-


H O R T O N -

O W N E R : R M

H T R U S T


0 3 / 0 3 / 1 6



V A R -

6 3 5 8 4

[ P R J -

6 3 4

8 2 ] -

V A R I A N C E

R E L A T E D

T O

W V R -

6 3 5 8 5

A N D

T M P -

6 3 5 8 6

-


H O R T O N -

O W N E R : R M

H T R U S T


0 3 / 0 3 / 1 6



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎธ

VAR-63584, WVR-63585 and TMP-6358
































SUBJECT:ABEYANCE - WVR-63585 - WAIVER RELATED TO VAR-63584 - PUBLIC HEARING -

APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: R M H TRUST - For possible action on a request for a

Waiver TO ALLOW A 187-FOOT EXTERNAL INTERSECTION OFFSET WHERE 220FEET IS THE MINIMUM DISTANCE SEPARATION REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW NO

INTERIOR STREETLIGHTS WHERE SUCH ARE REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED

RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 1.90 acres at the northwest corner of Dorrell Lane and

Decatur Boulevard (APN 125-24-503-020), R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 6(Ross) [PRJ-63482]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 7/20/2016




RECOMMENDATION:



1. Consolidated Backup2. Supporting Documentation





paper use, backup










ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎธ

WVR-63585



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎธ

WVR-63585








SUBJECT:ABEYANCE - TMP-63586 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO VAR-63584 AND WVR-

63585 - DECATUR & DONALD II - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON -

OWNER: R M H TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR ANEIGHT-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 1.90 acres at the northwest

corner of Dorrell Lane and Decatur Boulevard (APN 125-24-503-020), R-1 (Single Family


C.C.: 7/20/2016






3. Protest/Support Postcards





paper use, backup










ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎธ

TMP-63586



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎธ

TMP-63586



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″




ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″




ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


T

M P 6 3 5 8 6



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


T M P 6 3 5 8 6



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎธ

TMP-63586



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎธ

TMP-63586



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎธ

TMP-63586



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎธ

TMP-63586



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎธ

TMP-63586



TMP 63586

DR Horton

NWC Dorrell Lane & Decatur Boulevard

Proposed 8 single family unit residential development.

Proposed Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT)

SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED [DWELL] 8

9.57 77

AM Peak Hour 0.75 6

PM Peak Hour 1.01 8

Existing traffic on nearby streets:

Decatur Boulevard

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 18,067

PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 1,445

Elkhorn Road


PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 566

Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:

Adjacent Street ADT Capacity

Decatur Boulevard 34,500

Elkhorn Road 34,500

This project will add approximately 77 trips per day on Donald Rd., Dorrell Ln., Decatur Blvd. and Elkhorn Rd. Decatur iscurrently at about 52 percent of capacity and Elkhorn is at about 21 percent of capacity. After this project, Decatur isexpected to be at about 53 percent of capacity and Elkhorn unchanged. Counts are not available in this area for Donald oDorrell, but they are believed to be under capacity.

Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 8 additional cars, or about two every fifteenminutes.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

















HORTON - OWNER: LEXINGTON PARTNERS LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a

request for a Variance TO ALLOW NO AMENITY ZONE WHERE SUCH IS REQUIREDFOR A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 11.86 acres adjacent to the north side

of Dorrell Lane, approximately 425 feet west of Decatur Boulevard (APNs Multiple), R-1

(Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-63479]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 7/20/2016





BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-63577, WVR-63579 and TMP-63589 [PRJ-63483]2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-63577, WVR-63579 and TMP-63589 [PRJ-63483]

3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-63577, WVR-63579 and TMP-63589 [PRJ-63483]4. Photo(s) - VAR-63577, WVR-63579 and TMP-63589 [PRJ-63483]5. Justification Letter - VAR-63577, WVR-63579 and TMP-63589 [PRJ-63483]

6. Telephone Protest/Support Log for VAR-63577, WVR-63579 and TMP-63580 [PRJ-63479]

and Protest/Support Postcards for VAR-63577 and WVR-63579 [PRJ-63479]7. Letter from DR Horton - VAR-63577, WVR-63579 and TMP-63580 [PRJ-63479]








JB




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: LEXINGTON

PARTNERS LLC, ET AL


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

VAR-63577 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to

conditions:

WVR-63579 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to

conditions:

VAR-63577

TMP-63580 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to

conditions:

VAR-63577

WVR-63579

** NOTIFICATION **


NOTICES MAILED 414 - VAR-63577 and WVR-63579

414 - TMP-63580

APPROVALS 4 - VAR-63577 and WVR-63579

3 - TMP-63580

PROTESTS 8 - VAR-63577 and WVR-6357911 - TMP-63580




JB

Conditions Page One


** CONDITIONS **


Planning




Safety.





WVR-63579 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. This approval shall be void two (2) years from the date of final approval, unless exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time may be filed for




3. A Waiver from of Title 19.02.240 to allow no street lighting along proposed interior private

streets where such is required is approved.

4. A Waiver from of Title 19.02.140 to allow a 154-foot external intersection offset where

220 feet is the minimum distance separation required is approved.




JB

Conditions Page Two







Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-63577)

and Waiver (WVR-63579) shall be required, if approved.


not recorded on all or a portion of the area embraced by the Tentative Map with four (4)years of the approval of the Tentative Map, this action is void.






5. In conjunction with creation, declaration and recordation of the subject common-interest

community, and prior to recordation of the Covenants, Codes and Restrictions (“CC&R”),or conveyance of any unit within the community, the Developer is required to record a

Declaration of Private Maintenance Requirements (“DPMR”) as a covenant on all

associated properties, and on behalf of all current and future property owners. The DPMRis to include a listing of all privately owned and/or maintained infrastructure improvements,







the DPMR. Following recordation, the Developer is to submit copies of the recorded





JB




Statutes.

Public Works

7. Construct half-street improvements on Dorrell Lane and all incomplete half-streetimprovements on Donald Road adjacent to this site. All existing paving damaged or

removed by this development shall be restored at its original location and to its original

width concurrent with development of this site. The sidewalks along Dorrell Lane shall

meet current American with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. Additionally,coordinate the construction of widened pavement adjacent to Assessor Parcel Number

#125-24-503-012 between this site and the Donald & Decatur II site (TMP-63586).

8. The private streets for this site must be granted as a “Public Utility Easement, Public SewerEasement, and Public Drainage Easement with private surface maintenance by the

Homeowner’s Association” on the Final Map for this site.

9. A working sanitary sewer connection shall be in place prior to final inspection of any units

within this development. Full permanent improvements on all major access streets,

including all required landscaped areas between the perimeter wall and adjacent publicstreet, shall be constructed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any building

permits beyond 50% of all units within this development. All off-site improvements

adjacent to this site, including all required landscaped areas between the perimeter walls


permits beyond 75%. The above thresholds notwithstanding, all required improvementsshall be constructed in accordance with Title19.02.130.D.


maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at all



Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits or

submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve


site shall be responsible to construct such neighborhood or local drainage facilityimprovements as are recommended by the City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage

Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.

12. As per Unified Development Code (UDC) 19.16.060.G, all requirements must be complied

with or such future compliance must be guaranteed by an approved performance securitymethod in accordance with UDC sections 19.02.130.C and 19.02.130.E.




JB










deviations.




JB



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a Tentative Map for a proposed 57-lot single-family residential subdivision,comprised of 57 residential lots and five common lots on 11.86-acres undeveloped site located

on the north side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 425 feet west of Decatur Boulevard, within a R-

1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district.


Complete Street development standards to allow no amenity zone where such is required along

Dorrell Lane and Donald Road, to allow a 154-foot external intersection offset where 220 feet is

the minimum distance separation required and to allow no streetlights along the proposed interior private streets where such are required. No unique or extraordinary evidence has been presented

to warrant the requested Waiver and Variance. As such, the hardship is self-imposed and;therefore, staff recommends denial of all associated applications with this project.

ISSUES

A Waiver is required to allow no installation of streetlights along the proposed interior private streets by Title 19.02.240 development standards.

A Waiver is required to allow a 154-foot external intersection offset where 220 feet is the

minimum distance separation required by Title 19.02.140 development standards. A Variance is required to allow no amenity zone improvements and sidewalk along Dorrell

Lane and Donald Road, which are required by Title 19.04 development standards.

ANALYSIS

The applicant has proposed to develop the subject site into a 57-lot single-family residentialsubdivision located on the north side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 425 feet west of Decatur

Boulevard, within an R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district. The subject site is 11.86-

acres and is currently undeveloped.

In addition, the applicant has also requested a Waiver (WVR-63579) of Title 19.02 and Variance

(VAR-63577) of Title 19.04 Complete Street development standards; to allow no amenity zone

where such is required along Dorrell Lane and Donald Road, to allow a 154-foot externalintersection offset where 220 feet is the minimum distance separation required and to allow no

streetlights along the proposed interior private streets where such are required.




JB

ANALYSIS


subdivision located on the north side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 425 feet west of Decatur

Boulevard, within an R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district. The subject site is 11.86-acres and is currently undeveloped.

In addition, the applicant has also requested a Waiver (WVR-63579) of Title 19.02 and Variance(VAR-63577) of Title 19.04 Complete Street development standards; to allow no amenity zone

where such is required along Dorrell Lane and Donald Road, to allow a 154-foot external

intersection offset where 220 feet is the minimum distance separation required and to allow nostreetlights along the proposed interior private streets where such are required.

The existing General Plan land use designation L (Low Density Residential) has an allowable

density of 5.49 dwelling units per gross acre, which is compatible with the 57 dwellings whichare proposed. The proposed lots range in size from 6,538 square feet to 14,139 square feet and

exceed the 60-foot minimum lot width required by code. Site access is proposed from Cinder

Horse Street, Amber Robin Street and Shady Palms Street by way of 47-foot private streets that

will serve this site. The applicant has indicated on the submitted plan that six-foot perimeterscreening walls and interior screening walls will be provided between the proposed lots and

surrounding the site, which will be designed in accordance with Title 19.06.060 development

standards. The submitted north/south and east/west cross section depicts maximum natural gradeless than 2% across this site. Per the Tables in Subdivision Code 19.06.050 a development with

natural slope less than 2%, is allowed a maximum 4-foot retaining wall. No retaining walls are

shown in the cross sections.


development. However, no comments were received that indicated either a favorable or





JB



The City is currently working on building complete streets throughout the City. No unique or

extraordinary evidence has been presented to warrant the requested Waiver and Variance. As

such, the hardship is self-imposed and; therefore, staff recommends denial of all associatedapplications with this project.










the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and undue hardships




and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance orresolution.”

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the applicant

has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing to not construct the required improvements


imposed by the site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant’s hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of

Variances.


No substantial evidence has been presented to warrant the requested Waiver of Title 19.02 toallow no streetlights along the proposed interior private streets and to allow a 154-foot external

intersection offset where 220 feet is the minimum distance separation allowed, staff recommends





JB





requested a Waiver (WVR-63579) of Title 19.02 and Variance (VAR-63577) of Title 19.04

Complete Street development standards to allow no amenity zone where such is required alongDorrell Lane and Donald Road, to allow a 154-foot external intersection offset where 220 feet is

the minimum distance separation required and to allow no streetlights along the proposed interior

private streets where such are required. Therefore, staff recommends denial with conditions.

The existing General Plan land use designation L (Low Density Residential) has an allowable

density of 5.49 dwelling units per gross acre, which is compatible with the 57 dwellings which

are proposed. The proposed lots range in size from 6,538 square feet to 14,139 square feet and

exceed the 60-foot minimum lot width required by code. Site access is proposed from CinderHorse Street, Amber Robin Street and Shady Palms Street by way of 47-foot private streets that

will serve this site. The applicant has indicated on the submitted plan that six-foot perimeter

screening walls and interior screening walls will be provided between the proposed lots andsurrounding the site, which will be designed in accordance with Title 19.06.060 development

standards. The submitted north/south and east/west cross section depicts maximum natural grade

less than 2% across this site. Per the Tables in Subdivision Code 19.06.050 a development withnatural slope less than 2%, is allowed a maximum 4-foot retaining wall. No retaining walls are

shown in the cross sections.


development. However, no comments were received that indicated either a favorable orunfavorable review of the proposed residential project.



such, the hardship is self-imposed and; therefore, staff recommends denial of all associated

applications with this project.


In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City Council,in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in order to:







JB






the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and undue hardships




resolution.”



imposed by the site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant’s hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of

Variances.


No substantial evidence has been presented to warrant the requested Waiver of Title 19.02 to

allow no streetlights along the proposed interior private streets and to allow a 154-foot externalintersection offset where 220 feet is the minimum distance separation allowed, staff recommends




requested a Waiver (WVR-63579) of Title 19.02 and Variance (VAR-63577) of Title 19.04

Complete Street development standards to allow no amenity zone where such is required along

Dorrell Lane and Donald Road, to allow a 154-foot external intersection offset where 220 feet is

the minimum distance separation required and to allow no streetlights along the proposed interior private streets where such are required. Therefore, staff recommends denial with conditions.




JB





07/16/03


(Residence Estates) to R-PD3 (Residential Planned Development - 3 Units

Per Acre) on 3.36 acres adjacent to the north side of Dorrelll Lane,

approximately 1,040 feet west of Decatur Boulevard. The PlanningCommission and staff recommended approval.

The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan Review

(SDR-2313) for a proposed 10-lot Single Family Development on 3.36 acres

adjacent to the north side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 1,040 feet west ofDecatur Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff recommended

approval.

11/17/05

The Planning Commission withdrew without prejudice a request for a

Variance (VAR-9585) to allow 31,162 square feet of open space where51,750 feet is the minimum amount of open space required for a proposed

residential planned development on 12.90 acres on the north side of Dorrell

Lane, approximately 630 feet west of Decatur Boulevard.

02/15/06

The City Council denied a request for a Rezoning (ZON-9367) from R-E

(Residence Estates) and R-E (Residence Estates) under resolution of intent toR-PD3 (Residential Planned Development - 3 Units per Acre) to: R-PD5

(Residential Planned Development - 5 Units per Acre) on 12.90 acres on the


Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended approval and staffrecommended denial of the request.

The City Council denied a request for a Site Development Plan Review

(SDR-9587) for a proposed 72-lot single family residential development on

12.90 acres on the north side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 630 feet west ofDecatur Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended approval and

staff recommended denial of the request.

03/09/06

The Planning Commission pulled a request for a Tentative Map (TMP-11019)

for a 67-lot single family residential subdivision on 12.9 acres on the north

side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 630 feet west of Decatur Boulevard. The parent Site Development Plan Review (SDR-9587) was denied at City

Council on 02/15/06.

06/07/06

The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA-

12234) to change the land use designation from ML (Medium Low DensityResidential) to L (Low Density Residential) on 12.9 acres adjacent to the


Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.




JB





(Residence Estates) and R-E under Resolution of Intent to R-PD3 (ResidentialPlanned Development – 3 Units per Acre) to R-1 (Single Family Residential)

on 12.9 acres adjacent to the north side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 450

feet west of Decatur Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staffrecommended approval.


for Private Streets in conjunction with a proposed 64-lot single family

residential development adjacent to the north side of Dorrell Lane,

approximately 450 feet west of Decatur Boulevard. The PlanningCommission and staff recommended approval.

07/27/06



Decatur Boulevard. Staff recommended approval. The map expired 07/27/08.

06/04/08


(EOT-27873) for the for the previously approved Special Use Permit (SUP-

12705) for private streets in conjunction with a proposed 64-lot single familyresidential development adjacent to the north side of Dorrell Lane,

approximately 450 feet west of Decatur Boulevard. Staff recommended



(EOT-27874) for the previously approved Rezoning (ZON-12235) from R-E

(Residence Estates) to R-1 (Single Family Residential) on 12.9 acres adjacentto the north side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 450 feet west of Decatur

Boulevard. Staff recommended approval of the request.

06/26/08


28062) for a proposed 64-lot single-family residential subdivision on 12.90acres adjacent to the north side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 450 feet west

of Decatur Boulevard. Staff recommended approval of the request.

03/12/13



Decatur Boulevard. Staff recommended denial of the request.

The Planning Commission struck from the agenda a request for a Variance(VAR-48169) to allow a minimum lot width of 60 feet where 65 feet is

required, to allow a 10-foot front yard setback on lots 1, 10 and 11 where 20feet is required and to allow a 10-foot corner side yard setback on lots 1, 24,

25 and 31 where 15 feet is required on 7.40 acres adjacent to the north side of

Dorrell Lane, approximately 420 feet west of Decatur Boulevard. Staffrecommended denial of the request.






JB




07/19/13 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership. (APN 125-24-503-004)

10/30/14A deed was recorded for a change in ownership. (APN 125-24-503-011)

A deed was recorded for a change in ownership. (APN 125-24-503-017)

11/03/14A deed was recorded for a change in ownership. (APN’s 125-24-503-008 & -

009)

03/10/16A deed was recorded for a change in ownership. (APN’s 125-24-503-001 & -002)


09/28/06Code Enforcement processed a case (#46694) involving a complaint aboutweeds, trash, garbage, debris and dangerous structures on undeveloped

property at 4920 West Dorrell Lane. The case was resolved 10/18/06.


02/23/16

A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the submittal

requirements for a Waiver, Variance and Tentative Map applications; for a

proposed 57-lot residential subdivision.

Neighborhood MeetingA neighborhood meeting is not required for this type of request nor was one held.

F ield Check

03/03/16

During a routine site inspection staff observed that the subject site was an

undeveloped parcel of land with high weeds and shrubs. Also, there wereexisting concrete building pads remaining from structures that were

previously located on the site.

Details of Appli cation RequestSite Area

Net Acres 11.86




JB



Surrounding

Property

Exi sting Land Use

Per Ti tle 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject Property Undeveloped L (Low DensityResidential)

R-1 (Single FamilyResidential)

NorthSingle-Family

Residential

ML (Medium Low



Units per Acre)

South

Single-Family

Residential

ML (Medium Low


R-1 (Single Family

Residential)

Undeveloped /

Single-FamilyResidential

ML (Medium Low


Single-FamilyResidential

ML (Medium LowDensity Residential)

R-PD6 (Residential

Planned Development – 6Units per Acre)

EastSingle-Family

ResidentialML (Medium Low


WestSingle-Family

Residential

ML (Medium Low


R-1 (Single Family

Residential)



Special Pur pose and Over lay Di str icts Compli anceRural Preservation Overlay District Y


Trails N/A





Pur suant to Tit le 19.06.070 development standards, the foll owing standards apply:Ex isting Zoning Permit ted Density Units Al lowed Units Provided

R-1 (Single Family





JB




Min. Setbacks:






Street Name

Functional

Classif ication of

Street(s)

Govern ing Document

Actual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliance

with Street

Section

Donald Road Minor Collector Master Plan of Streets &Highways

60 N*


Highways60 N*




Internal Street 4


Cul-de-sac Terminus 0Intersection – External Street or Stub Terminus 0

Intersection – Stub Terminus w/ Temporary Turn AroundEasements

0


Total 4 3

Required Provided

Connectivity Ratio (L inks / Nodes): 1.30 1.33



Donald Road



zone, sidewalk and

streetlights


way with sidewalk,

streetlights and no

amenity zone

N*




JB

Staff Report Page Nine


Streetscape Standards Required Provided Compliance

Dorrell Lane


way, including amenityzone, sidewalk and

streetlights


way with sidewalk,streetlights and no

amenity zone

N*

Cinder Horse Street

(private street)



zone, sidewalk andstreetlights

47-foot wide right-of-way, sidewalk, amenity

zone and no streetlights

N*

Amber Robin Street

(private street)


zone, sidewalk andstreetlights


way, sidewalk, amenity


N*

Shady Palms Street(private street)

47-foot wide right-of-way, including amenityzone, sidewalk and

streetlights

47-foot wide right-of-way, sidewalk, amenity


N*


Title 19.02 improvement requirements and 19.04 complete street development standards to

install no amenity zone along Dorrell Lane and Donald Road; and no streetlights on the three

proposed private drives Cinder Horse Street, Amber Robin Street and Shady Palms Street which provides access to the subject site.

Pursuant to Titl e 19.08 and 19.12, the foll owing parking standards apply:Parki ng Requi rement

Use

Gross F loor

Area or

Number of

Units


Parking

Ratio

Parking Parking

RegularHandi-

cappedRegular

Handi-

capped

Single-Family

Detached57 du

2 spaces

per du114





ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

VAR-63577



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

VAR-63577



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

VAR-63577



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

VAR-63577



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

VAR-63577



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

VAR-63577



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

VAR-63577



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″

О Ő İ ″ ㅡ ՙ ɱ

V A R 6 3 5 7 7

W V R 6 3 5 8 8

d T M P 6 3 5 8 0



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


V A R 6 3 5 7 7

W V R 6 3 5 7 9 a n d T

M P 6 3 5 8 0





ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


V A R 6 3 5 7 7 W

V R 6 3 5 7 9 a n d

T M P 6 3 5 8 0



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


V A R 6 3 5 7 7

W V R 6 3 5 7 9

d T M P 6 3 5 8 0



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


V A R 6 3 5 7 7

W V R 6 3 5 7 9 a

n d T M P 6 3 5 8 0



V A R - 6 3 5 7 7

[ P R J - 6 3 4

7 9 ] -

V A R I A N C E

R E L A T E D

T O

W V R - 6 3 5 7 9

A N D

T M P - 6 3 5 8 0

-


H O R T O N - O W N E R : L E X I N G T O N P A R T N E R S L L C , E T

A L

N O R T H S I D E O F D O R

R E L L L A N E , W E S T O F D E C A T U R

B O U L E V A R D

0 3 / 0 3 / 1 6



V A R - 6 3 5 7 7

[ P R J - 6 3 4

7 9 ] -

V A R I A N C E

R E L A T E D

T O

W V R - 6 3 5 7 9

A N D

T M P - 6 3 5 8 0

-



A L



B O U L E V A R D

0 3 / 0 3 / 1 6



V A R - 6 3 5 7 7

[ P R J - 6 3 4

7 9 ] -

V A R I A N C E

R E L A T E D

T O

W V R - 6 3 5 7 9

A N D

T M P - 6 3 5 8 0

-



A L



B O U L E V A R D

0 3 / 0 3 / 1 6



V A R - 6 3 5 7 7

[ P R J - 6 3 4

7 9 ] -

V A R I A N C E

R E L A T E D

T O

W V R - 6 3 5 7 9

A N D

T M P - 6 3 5 8 0

-



A L



B O U L E V A R D

0 3 / 0 3 / 1 6





ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

VAR-63577, WVR-63579 and TMP-6358

























VAR-63577 WVR-63579 and TMP-63580









APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: LEXINGTON PARTNERS LLC, ET AL - For

possible action on a request for a Waiver TO ALLOW A 154-FOOT EXTERNALINTERSECTION OFFSET WHERE 220 FEET IS THE MINIMUM DISTANCE

SEPARATION REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW NO INTERIOR STREETLIGHTS WHERE

SUCH ARE REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 11.86 acres

adjacent to the north side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 425 feet west of Decatur Boulevard(APNs Multiple), R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-63479]. Staff

recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 7/20/2016




RECOMMENDATION:







paper use, backup










ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

WVR-63579



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

WVR-63579



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

WVR-63579



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

WVR-63579



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

WVR-63579



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

WVR-63579



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

WVR-63579









63579 - DECATUR & DONALD I - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON -

OWNER: LEXINGTON PARTNERS LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for aTentative Map FOR A 57-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 11.86

acres adjacent to the north side of Dorrell Lane, approximately 425 feet west of Decatur

Boulevard (APNs Multiple), R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-63479].


C.C.: 7/20/2016






2. Supporting Documentation3. Protest/Support Postcards





paper use, backup










ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

TMP-63580



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

TMP-63580



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

TMP-63580



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

TMP-63580



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

TMP-63580



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

TMP-63580



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

TMP-63580



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


T M P 6 3 5 8 0



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


T M P 6 3 5 8 0



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


T M

P 6 3 5 8 0



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


T M P

6 3 5 8 0



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


T M

P - 6 3 5 8 0



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

TMP-63580



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

TMP-63580



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

TMP-63580



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡՙɱ

TMP-63580



TMP 63580

DR Horton

N side of Dorrell Lane, W of Decatur Boulevard


Proposed Use



9.57 545

AM Peak Hour 0.75 43

PM Peak Hour 1.01 58


Decatur Boulevard


PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 1,445

Elkhorn Road





Decatur Boulevard 34,500

Elkhorn Road 34,500

This project will add approximately 545 trips per day on Donald Rd., Dorrell Ln., Decatur Blvd. and Elkhorn Rd. Decatur iscurrently at about 52 percent of capacity and Elkhorn is at about 21 percent of capacity. After this project, Decatur isexpected to be at about 54 percent of capacity and Elkhorn to be at about 22 percent of capacity. Counts are not availablin this area for Donald or Dorrell, but they are believed to be under capacity.

Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 58 additional cars, or about one every minute.


































HORTON - OWNER: PRECEDENT PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for

a Variance TO ALLOW A CONNECTIVITY RATIO OF 1.0 WHERE 1.3 IS REQUIRED ANDTO ALLOW NO AMENITY ZONE WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED

RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 2.10 acres at the southeast corner of Dorrell Lane and

Unicorn Street (APN 125-24-602-001), R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross)

[PRJ-63483]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 7/20/2016





BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-63587, WVR-63588 and TMP-63589 [PRJ-63483]

2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-63587, WVR-63588 and TMP-63589 [PRJ-63483]3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-63587, WVR-63588 and TMP-63589 [PRJ-63483]4. Photo(s) - VAR-63587, WVR-63588 and TMP-63589 [PRJ-63483]

5. Justification Letter - VAR-63587, WVR-63588 and TMP-63589 [PRJ-63483]

6. Telephone Protest/Support Log, Protest E-mail and Petition for VAR-63587, WVR-63588and TMP-63589 [PRJ-63483] and Protest/Support Email and Postcards for VAR-63587 and

WVR-63588 [PRJ-63483]

7. Letter from DR Horton - VAR-63587, WVR-63588 and TMP-63589 [PRJ-63483]








JB




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: PRECEDENT

PROPERTIES, LLC


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

VAR-63587 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject toconditions:

WVR-63588 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject toconditions:

VAR-63587

TMP-63589 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to

conditions:

VAR-63584

WVR-63588

** NOTIFICATION **


NOTICES MAILED 235 - VAR-63587 and WVR-63588235 - TMP-63589

APPROVALS 4 - VAR-63587 and WVR-635884 - TMP-63589

PROTESTS 40 - VAR-63587 and WVR-63588

37 - TMP-63589






JB

Conditions Page Two







Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-63587)

and Waiver (WVR-63588) shall be required, if approved.


not recorded on all or a portion of the area embraced by the Tentative Map with four (4)years of the approval of the Tentative Map, this action is void.






5. In conjunction with creation, declaration and recordation of the subject common-interest

community, and prior to recordation of the Covenants, Codes and Restrictions (“CC&R”),or conveyance of any unit within the community, the Developer is required to record a

Declaration of Private Maintenance Requirements (“DPMR”) as a covenant on all

associated properties, and on behalf of all current and future property owners. The DPMRis to include a listing of all privately owned and/or maintained infrastructure improvements,







the DPMR. Following recordation, the Developer is to submit copies of the recorded





JB




Statutes.

Publi c Works

7. Dedicate an additional 5-feet of right-of-way for a total radius of 15-feet on the southeastcorner of Dorrell Lane and Unicorn Street on the Final Map for this site.

8. Construct all half-street improvements on Dorrell Lane and Unicorn Street adjacent to this

site. All existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at itsoriginal location and to its original width concurrent with development of this site.

9. The private street for this site must be granted as a “Public Util ity Easement, Public Sewer

Easement, and Public Drainage Easement with private surface maintenance by theHomeowner’s Association” on the Final Map for this site.

10. A working sanitary sewer connection shall be in place prior to final inspection of any unitswithin this development. Full permanent improvements on all major access streets,

including all required landscaped areas between the perimeter wall and adjacent public

street, shall be constructed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any building permits beyond 50% of all units within this development. All off-site improvements

adjacent to this site, including all required landscaped areas between the perimeter walls


permits beyond 75%. The above thresholds notwithstanding, all required improvements

shall be constructed in accordance with Title19.02.130.D.

11. All landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated andmaintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at all


12. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by theDepartment of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits or

submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve


site shall be responsible to construct such neighborhood or local drainage facility

improvements as are recommended by the City of Las Vegas Neighborhood DrainageStudies and approved Drainage Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.

13. As per Unified Development Code (UDC) 19.16.060.G, all requirements must be complied

with or such future compliance must be guaranteed by an approved performance security

method in accordance with UDC sections 19.02.130.C and 19.02.130.E.




JB










deviations.




JB



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a Tentative Map for a proposed eight-lot single-family residentialsubdivision, comprised of eight residential lots and two common lots on a 2.10-acre undeveloped

site located on the southeast corner of Dorrell Lane and Unicorn Street, within a R-1 (Single

Family Residential) zoning district.


Complete Street development standards; to allow a connectivity ratio of 1.0 where 1.3 is

required, to allow no amenity zone where such is required along Dorrell Lane and Unicorn

Street, to allow a 183-foot external intersection offset where 220 feet is the minimum distanceseparation required and to allow no streetlights along the proposed interior private street where

such are required. No unique or extraordinary evidence has been presented to warrant therequested Waiver and Variance. As such, the hardship is self-imposed and; therefore, staff

recommends denial of all associated applications with this project.

ISSUES

A Waiver is required to allow no installation of streetlights along the proposed interior private street required by Title 19.02.240 development standards.

A Waiver is required to allow a 183-foot external intersection offset where 220 feet is theminimum distance separation required by Title 19.02.140 development standards.

A Variance application is required to allow a connectivity ratio of 1.0 where 1.3 is required by Title 19.04.040 development standards.

A Variance is required to allow, no amenity zone improvements and sidewalk along Dorrell

Lane and Unicorn Street, which are required by Title 19.04 development standards.

ANALYSIS


subdivision located on the southeast corner of Dorrell Lane and Unicorn Street, within an R-1(Single Family Residential) zoning district. The subject site is 2.10-acres and is currently

undeveloped.

In addition, the applicant has also requested a Waiver (WVR-63588) of Title 19.02 and Variance(VAR-63587) of Title 19.04 Complete Street development standards; to allow a connectivity

ratio of 1.0 where 1.3 is required, to allow no amenity zone where such is required along Dorrell




JB



Lane and Unicorn Street, to allow a 183-foot external intersection offset where 220 feet is the

minimum distance separation required and to allow no streetlights along the proposed interior

private street where such are required.

The existing General Plan land use designation ML (Medium Low Density Residential) has an

allowable density of 8.49 dwelling units per gross acre, which is compatible with the eightdwellings which are proposed. The proposed lots range in size from 8,268 square feet to 10,898

square feet and exceed the 60-foot minimum lot width required by code. Site access is proposed

from Cinder Crow Court by way of a 47-foot private street that will serve this site. The applicant

has indicated on the submitted plan that six-foot perimeter screening walls and interior screeningwalls will be provided between the proposed lots and surrounding the site, which will be

designed in accordance with Title 19.06.060 development standards. The submitted north/south

and east/west cross section depicts maximum natural grade less than 2% across this site. Per the

Tables in Subdivision Code 19.06.050 a development with natural slope less than 2%, is alloweda maximum 4-foot retaining wall. No retaining walls are shown in the cross sections.

The Clark County School District was provided an opportunity to comment on the proposeddevelopment. However, no comments were received that indicated either a favorable or




such, the hardship is self-imposed and; therefore, staff recommends denial of all associated

applications with this project.







Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific piece of

property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of exceptionaltopographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition of






JB





and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance orresolution.”



imposed by the site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant’s hardship is

preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting ofVariances.


No substantial evidence has been presented to warrant the requested Waiver of Title 19.02 to

allow no streetlights along the proposed interior private street and to allow a 187-foot externalintersection offset where 220 feet is the minimum distance separation allowed, staff recommends




requested a Waiver (WVR-63588) of Title 19.02 and Variance (VAR-63587) of Title 19.04Complete Street development standards to allow a connectivity ratio of 1.0 where 1.3 is required,

to allow no amenity zone where such is required along Dorrell Lane and Unicorn Street, to allowa 183-foot external intersection offset where 220 feet is the minimum distance separation

required and to allow no streetlights along the proposed interior private street where such are

required. Therefore, staff recommends denial with conditions.



06/10/04

The Planning Commission denied a request for a Rezoning (ZON-4215) fromR-E (Residence Estates) to R-2 (Medium-Low Density Residential) adjacent

to the southeast corner of Dorrell Lane and Unicorn Street. Staff

recommended denial of the request.

07/07/04

The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-4215) from R-E(Residence Estates) to R-1 (Single Family Residential) adjacent to the

southeast corner of Dorrell Lane and Unicorn Street. The Planning

Commission and staff recommended denial of the request.




JB




06/08/06

The Planning Commission approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-13209) to allow a 40-foot wide private street for a proposed eight-lot singlefamily residential development on the southeast corner of Dorrell Lane and

Unicorn Street. Staff recommended denial of the request.

07/12/06

The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-13209) to

allow a 40-foot wide private street for a proposed eight-lot single familyresidential development on the southeast corner of Dorrell Lane and Unicorn

Street. The Planning Commission recommended approval and Staff

recommended denial of the request.

07/27/06


13210) for an eight-lot single-family residential subdivision at the southeast

corner of Dorrell Lane and Unicorn Street. Staff recommended denial of therequest.

02/21/07

The City Council approved a request for a Review of Condition (ROC-19029)

Number 8 from an approved Rezoning (ZON-4215) to allow the deferral ofstreet light installation on Unicorn Street and Dorrell Lane where it was

previously required for a proposed residential development adjacent to the

southeast corner of Dorrell Lane and Unicorn Street. Staff recommended


The City Council approved a request for a Reinstatement and Extension ofTime (EOT-19030) of an approved Rezoning (ZON-4215) from R-E

(Residence Estates) to R-1 (Single Family Residential) adjacent to the

southeast corner of Dorrell Lane and Unicorn Street. Staff recommendedapproval of the request.






06/26/06A Code Enforcement case (#43769) was processed for an abandoned truck on property located at 5201 West Dorrell Lane. The case was resolved on

07/13/06.

10/14/09

A Code Enforcement case (#83083) was processed for an abandoned truck on

property located at 5201 West Dorrell Lane. The case was resolved on10/29/09.




JB




02/23/16

A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the submittal

requirements for a Waiver, Variance and Tentative Map applications; for a proposed eight-lot residential subdivision.


A neighborhood meeting is not required for this type of request nor was one held.

F ield Check

03/03/16During a routine site inspection staff observed that the subject site was anundeveloped parcel of land with high weeds and shrubs.


Site Area

Net Acres 2.10

Surrounding

Property

Exi sting Land Use

Per Ti tle 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject Property UndevelopedML (Medium Low

Density Residential)R-1 (Single Family

Residential)

NorthSingle-Family

Residential

ML (Medium Low


R-1 (Single Family

Residential)South

Single-Family

Residential

ML (Medium Low


EastSingle-Family

ResidentialML (Medium Low


West UndevelopedML (Medium Low




Special Pur pose and Over lay Di str icts Compli anceRural Preservation Overlay District Y


Trails N/A







JB




Pur suant to Tit le 19.06.070 development standards, the foll owing standards apply:Ex isting Zoning Permit ted Density Units Al lowed Units Provided

R-1 (Single Family



Min. Setbacks:






Street Name

Functional

Classif ication of

Street(s)

Govern ing Document

Actual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliance

with Street

Section

Unicorn Street Minor CollectorMaster Plan of Streets &

Highways60 N*


Highways60 N*




Internal Street 1




Intersection – Stub Terminus w/ Temporary Turn Around

Easements 0 Non-Vehicular Path - Unrestricted 0

Total 1 1

Required Provided

Connectivity Ratio (L inks / Nodes): 1.30 1.00*

*The applicant has requested a Variance (VAR-63587) to allow a connectivity ratio of 1.0 where

1.3 is required by Title 19.04.040 development standards.




JB





Unicorn Street

60-foot wide right-of-way, including amenityzone, sidewalk and

streetlights

60-foot wide right-of-way with sidewalk,streetlights and no

amenity zone

N*

Dorrell Lane



zone, sidewalk and

streetlights


way with sidewalk,

streetlights and no

amenity zone

N*

Cinder Crow Court

(private street)


zone, sidewalk and

streetlights


way, sidewalk, amenityzone and no streetlights

N*


Title 19.02 improvement requirements and 19.04 complete street development standards to

install no amenity zone along Dorrell Lane and Unicorn Street; and no streetlights on the proposed private drive Cinder Crow Court which provides access to the subject site.



Use

Gross F loor

Area or

Number ofUnits


ParkingRatio

Parking Parking

Regular Handi-capped

Regular Handi-capped

Single-Family

Detached8 du

2 spaces

per du16





ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎ

VAR-63587



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎ

VAR-63587



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″

О Ő İ ″ ㅡ ฎ



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″




ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


V A R 6 3 5 8 7

W V R 6 3 5 8 8

d T M P 6 3 5 8 9



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


V A R 6 3 5 8 7

W V R 6 3 5 8 8

d T M P 6 3 5 8 9



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


V A R 6 3

5 8 7

W V R 6 3 5

8 8 a n d T M P 6 3 5 8 9



V A R -

6 3 5 8 7

[ P R J -

6 3 4

8 3 ] -

V A R I A N C E

R E L A T E D

T O

W V R -

6 3 5 8 8

A N D

T M P -

6 3 5 8 9

-


H O R T O N -

O W N E R : P R E C E D E N T P R O P E R T I E S ,

L L C


O F D O R R E L L L A N E A N D U N I C O

R N S T R E E T

0 3 / 0 3 / 1 6





V A R -

6 3 5 8 7

[ P R J -

6 3 4

8 3 ] -

V A R I A N C E

R E L A T E D

T O

W V R -

6 3 5 8 8

A N D

T M P -

6 3 5 8 9

-


H O R T O N -

O W N E R : P R E C E D E N T P R O P E R T I E S ,

L L C


O F D O R R E L L L A N E A N D U N I C O

R N S T R E E T

0 3 / 0 3 / 1 6



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎ

VAR-63587, WVR-63588 and TMP-6358



















































VAR-63587 WVR-63588 and TMP-63589









APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: PRECEDENT PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible

action on a request for a Waiver TO ALLOW A 183-FOOT EXTERNAL INTERSECTIONOFFSET WHERE 220 FEET IS THE MINIMUM DISTANCE SEPARATION REQUIRED

AND TO ALLOW NO INTERIOR STREETLIGHTS WHERE SUCH ARE REQUIRED FOR

A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 2.10 acres at the southeast corner of Dorrell

Lane and Unicorn Street (APN 125-24-602-001), R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 6(Ross) [PRJ-63483]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 7/20/2016




RECOMMENDATION:



1. Consolidated Backup2. Supporting Documentation





paper use, backup










ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎ

WVR-63588



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎ

WVR-63588









63588 - DECATUR & DONALD III - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON -

OWNER: PRECEDENT PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a TentativeMap FOR AN EIGHT-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 2.10 acres

at the southeast corner of Dorrell Lane and Unicorn Street (APN 125-24-602-001), R-1 (Single

Family Residential) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-63483]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

C.C: 7/20/2016






3. Protest/Support Email and Postcards





paper use, backup










ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎ

TMP-63589



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎ

TMP-63589



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″




ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


T

M P 6 3 5 8 9



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


T

M P 6 3 5 8 9



ｘ ธ ゜ ธ ㄦ゜ ″


T M

P 6 3 5 8 9



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎ

TMP-63589



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎ

TMP-63589



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎ

TMP-63589



ｘธ゜ธㄦ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ㅡฎ

TMP-63589



TMP 63483

DR Horton

SEC Dorrell Lane & Unicorn Street


Proposed Use



9.57 77

AM Peak Hour 0.75 6

PM Peak Hour 1.01 8


Bradley Road



Deer Springs Way





Bradley Road 16,300

Deer Springs Way 34,500

This project will add approximately 77 trips per day on Dorrell Ln., Unicorn St., Bradley Rd. and Deer Springs Way.Bradley is currently at about 33 percent of capacity and Deer Springs is at about 8 percent of capacity. After this project,Bradley is expected to be at about 34 percent of capacity and Deer Springs unchanged. Counts are not available in thisarea for Dorrell or Unicorn, but they are believed to be under capacity.

Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 8 additional cars, or about two every fifteenminutes.











































SUBJECT:ABEYANCE - SUP-63935 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/

OWNER: YIZHAQ ROZOLYO - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR

A PROPOSED SHORT-TERM RESIDENTIAL RENTAL USE WITH A WAIVER TOALLOW A 560-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A SIMILAR USE WHERE 660

FEET IS REQUIRED at 557 Canosa Avenue (APN 162-03-314-023), R-1 (Single Family

Residential) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-63934]. Staff recommends DENIAL.







BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps



6. Protest Postcards and Telephone Log









SUP-63935 [PRJ-63934]

NE




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/ OWNER: YIZHAQ ROZOLYO


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL


conditions:

** NOTIFICATION**


NOTICES MAILED 293

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 20



SUP-63935 [PRJ-63934]

NE

Conditions Page One


** CONDITIONS**


Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Short-TermResidential Rental use.



3. A Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a 560-foot distance separationfrom a similar use, where 660 feet is required.


Safety.



6. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be satisfied,except as modified herein.



SUP-63935 [PRJ-63934]

NE



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a Special Use Permit to allow a Short-Term Residential Rental use at 557

Canosa Avenue. The applicant is also requesting a Waiver to allow this use within 560 feet of a

similar use. Staff finds locating an additional Short-Term Residential Rental within 560 feet of

another Short-Term Residential Rental to be too intense for the existing residential neighborhoodand is recommending denial of this application. If denied, the applicant will not be able to offer

the residence as a Short-Term Residential Rental; and if approved, staff request the Special Use

Permit be subject to conditions.

ISSUES

Short-Term Residential Rental is a Conditional Use in the R-1 (Single Family Residential)zoning district; however, the applicant was not able to meet Condition Number 4, which

requires a distance separation of 660 feet in between Short-Term Residential Rental uses.Another Short-Term Residential Rental exists approximately 560 feet from the subject site.

ANALYSIS

The Short-Term Residential Rental use is defined as “the commercial use, or the making

available for commercial use, of a residential dwelling unit for dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes, wherein any individual guest rents or occupies the unit for a period of less than 31

consecutive calendar days. This use does not include a “Community Residence,” “Facility for

Transitional Living for Released Offenders,” or any other facility with dwelling units that is

specifically defined in Chapter 19.18.”

The subject site meets the definition of a Short-Term Residential Rental, as the applicant has

proposed to lease the three-bedroom, detached, single family residence to the public for

dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes for less than 31 consecutive calendar days.


1. Requirement 1: The operator must obtain a business license to operate the use.

If this request for a Special Use Permit for a Short-Term Residential Rental use is

approved, the applicant will be required to obtain a business license for the commercial

use of the residence.



SUP-63935 [PRJ-63934]

NE



2. Requirement 2: The use must comply on an ongoing basis with all governmental

licensing and regulatory requirements, including the payment of applicable room taxes

and licensing fees.

If approved, once a business license is issued for a Short-Term Residential Rental use,

the license will be subject to regulatory requirements with annual compliance reviews to

ensure compliance.

3. Requirement 3: The use must comply with the City’s noise regulations as they apply to

residential uses.

If the proposed use violates the City’s noise regulations, neighbors, and/or members ofthe public are able to file a complaint with the Department of Planning’s Code

Enforcement Division. If substantiated, the violation could result in a fine, and/or loss of

business license.

4. Requirement 4: Vehicle parking associated with the use shall comply with applicable

parking regulations, and vehicles of guests and invitees shall not obstruct traffic or access

to other properties in the area.

If the parking regulations are violated, neighbors, and/or members of the public may file

a complaint with the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, or the Department of Planning’s Business License Division for non-compliance with business licensing

requirements.

5. Requirement 5: In addition to and independent of any enforcement authority or remedy

described in this Title, the failure to comply with a Minimum Special Use Permit

Requirement or other condition of approval associated with this use may be enforced as

in the case of a violation of Title 6 by means of a civil proceeding pursuant to LVMC

6.02.400 to 6.02.460, inclusive.

If approved, and a business license is issued, the subject site will be subject to an annual

review for compliance by the Department of Planning’s Business Licensing Division.

6. Requirement 6: The use may not be located closer than 660 feet to any other Short-Term

Residential Rental use (measured from property line to property line).



SUP-63935 [PRJ-63934]

NE



The subject site was unable to satisfy this condition, and a Waiver has been requested by

the applicant to allow for a 560-foot distance separation between similar uses where 660

feet is required.

7. Requirement 7: The maximum occupancy of the residential dwelling unit shall not

exceed the limits provided for in LVMC 6.75.090.

If approved, and a business license is issued, the subject site will be subject to regular

inspections by the Department of Planning’s Business Licensing Division ensuringcompliance with Short-Term Residential Rental use regulations.

Staff finds the proposed Short-Term Residential Rental use at 557 Canosa Avenue to not be

compatible with the existing residential neighborhood as there is a similar use actively licensedat 1824 Rexford Drive, approximately 560 feet away from the subject property. In addition, there

are two additional Short-Term Residential Rentals within the immediate area. 1900 Rexford

Drive is located approximately 570 feet away from the subject site and also holds an activeShort-Term Residential Rental use business license; in addition to 545 East St. Louis Avenue,

located approximately 630 feet away from the subject site. This location also holds an active

business license for a Short-Term Residential Rental use. Staff finds the immediate area withinthe 660-foot radius of the subject site to already be saturated with Short-Term Residential Rental

uses and is recommending denial of this application. If approved, subject to conditions.






The proposed land use cannot be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and

compatible with the existing surrounding land uses due to the Waiver request for a 560-

foot distance separation from a similar use. If approved, it will set precedents that wouldallow other Short-Term Residential Rental uses to proliferate and change the character of

the residential neighborhood.


The subject site is not physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed as

there is another Short-Term Residential Rental use approximately 560 feet away.



SUP-63935 [PRJ-63934]

NE





The subject site is currently accessed by Canosa Avenue, a 50-foot wide local street.



General Plan.

If approved, the Special Use Permit will be subject to conditions, and the applicant will be

required to obtain a City business license, which is also subject to inspection.


The proposed use does not meet all of the applicable conditions of approval as

demonstrated by the Waiver request to be located within 560 feet of a similar use.








No related building permits or business licenses.


03/22/16Staff conducted a pre-application meeting where the submittal requirementsfor a Special Use Permit were discussed.





SUP-63935 [PRJ-63934]

NE



F ield Check

03/31/16

Staff conducted a routine field check where a well maintained, detached,

single family residence was observed.


Site Area

Net Acres 0.19

Surrounding

Property

Ex isting Land Use

Per Ti tle 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject Property Single FamilyResidence, Detached L (Low DensityResidential) R-1 (Single FamilyResidential)

NorthSingle Family

Residence, DetachedL (Low Density

Residential)R-1 (Single Family

Residential)

SouthSingle Family

Residence, Detached

L (Low Density

Residential)

R-1 (Single Family

Residential)

EastSingle Family

Residence, Detached

L (Low Density

Residential)

R-1 (Single Family

Residential)

WestSingle Family

Residence, Detached

L (Low Density

Residential)

R-1 (Single Family

Residential)


Beverly Green / Southridge Neighborhood Plan Y


A-O (Airport Overlay) District – 200 Feet Y or N


Trails N/A





Street Name

Functional

Classif ication of

Street(s)

Govern ing Document

Actual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliance

with Street

Section

Canosa Avenue Local Title 13 50 Y



SUP-63935 [PRJ-63934]

NE





Use

Gross F loor

Area or

Number of

Units


Parking

Ratio

Parking Parking

RegularHandi-

cappedRegular

Handi-

capped

Short-Term

Residential

Rental

2,146 SF

No additional

parkingrequired

beyond that

which is

required forthe principal

use on thesite.



Waivers


The use may not be located

closer than 660 feet to any other

Short-Term Residential Rentaluse (measured from property

line to property line)

To be located 560 feetaway from another

Short-Term ResidentialRental

Denial



ｘ゜ｘ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ɱㅡ

SUP-63935





ｘ゜ｘ゜ ″

О Ő İ ″ ɱ ㅡ



ｘ゜ｘ゜ ″

О Ő İ ″ ɱ ㅡ

S U P - 6 3 9 3 5



ｘ゜ｘ゜ ″

О Ő İ ″ ɱ ㅡ

S U

P - 6 3 9 3 5



ｘ゜ｘ゜ ″

О Ő İ ″ ɱ ㅡ

S U

P - 6 3 9 3 5





S U P -

6 3 9 3 5 [ P R J -

6 3 9 3 4 ] -

S P E C I A L U S E P E R M I T -

A P P L I C A N T / O W N E R : Y I Z H A Q R O

Z O L Y O

5 5 7 C A N O S A A V E N U E

0 3 / 3 1 / 1 6



ｘ゜ｘ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ɱㅡSUP-63935



ｘ゜ｘ゜

″

ОŐİ ″ɱㅡ

SUP-63935





































Documents

06-14-16 PC Final Packet Items 1-34