077 CIM08 Abstracts

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

077 CIM08 Abstracts

Citation preview

  • Identifying Contrapuntal Modules in Palestrina's MassesFrauke Jurgensen

    University of Aberdeen, United KingdomIan Knopke

    Music Informatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.

    BACKGROUND IN MUSIC HISTORY AND THEORYTechniques of melodic repetition in Renaissance counterpoint often result in short vertical combinations of melodic segments, called modules, that are themselves repeated. These modules have been investigated recently in several important research projects. For example, Owens draws on manuscript evidence to show that composers worked with modules as part of their compositional process. Schubert shows that the types of modules identifiedby the sixteenth-century theorist Cerone appear in the motets of Palestrina's 1563 collection. Collins Judd relates contrapuntal techniques to structure in the works of Josquin, and Milsom finds repeated contrapuntal combinations in Josquin's motets for five or more voices. Lessoil-Daelman studies the use of new and borrowed modules in parody Masses by Palestrina, Lassus, and De Monte. The problem with traditional analysis-by-hand as used by these researchers is that it takes a lot of time, making it hard to arrive at convincing statistics to support hypotheses about form across whole repertories of music.

    BACKGROUND IN MUSIC INFORMATICSWhile most MIR research has been focused directly on digital audio recordings, the recent appearance of large databases of music in symbolic form, derived directly from musical scores, have made it possible to approach traditional music theory questions in a new way. This also raises various technical challenges, such as how to locate many similar (but not necessarily identical) musical fragments across large music sets. Many of the problems are similar to those found in the string matching problems used in biological sequencing applications.

    AIMSRepeated contrapuntal combinations (modules) arise from the interaction of rules of counterpoint and melodic repetition. Recent research has hypothesized that composers made deliberate use of such modules, and that these often formed the underlying framework for organizing larger musical works. Our goal with this project has been to investigate a number of musicological questions that arise from this, including: how do modules contribute to the structure of a piece as a whole? How do the restrictions imposed by writing counterpoint against a pre-existent melody affect the writing style? Are particular patterns of repetition more used at beginnings, middles, or ends of pieces? How do modules behave in pieces with different numbers of voices? Many of Palestrina's Masses are Parody Masses. What happens to the contrapuntal combinations of a motet when the motet is quoted in a Parody Mass?

    MAIN CONTRIBUTIONThe musical material we have been working with to answer these questions is the entire corpus of Palestrina's 104 Masses, made available in Humdrum format by Bret Aarden in 2004. The database is based on John Miller's 1992 electronic edition, based in turn on the Casimiri edition of Palestrina's works. Palestrina's music follows rigorously-applied rules of composition and is the largest, most consistent body of renaissance counterpoint that is easily accessible to us. Because of the large amount of music involved, we have taken a computational approach to investigating these questions, constructing musically-informed algorithms to locate ornamented modules across the entire corpus, and to do it within a reasonable amount of time.Automated ted detection of modules by computer poses several difficult problems. First, the modules can undergo transpositions and contrapuntal transformations as they are repeated, may be concealed with ornaments, or truncated. Pattern-matching algorithms specifically tailored to contrapuntal variation needed to be developed. Second, a system to generate potential modules, encode these patterns into a symbolic form suitable for computer-based queries, and search for them in several pieces becomes impossibly unwiedly when applied to a corpus this large (over a million notes). Our methodology is based on the use of a musically-

    CIM08 Abstract Proceedings, Thessaloniki, 3-6 July 2008

    86

  • adapted suffix array system, in combination with a set of database techniques. Within the entire set of 104 masses, we have identified groupings of recurring modules that appear to serve as structural elements within each mass.This work is a continuation of research previously presented at CIM04 and CIM05.

    IMPLICATIONSThe structures we identify are one piece of the puzzle that is compositional practice and style development. For the first time, we are able to study the interaction of counterpoint and form through the detailed analysis of hundreds of complete pieces by Palestrina and other major composers. Patterns of module repetition can be compared to models of parody Masses and the works of other composers, as well as the patterns found by other scholars, such as Cumming and Schubert. The method developed for this project can then be applied to other repertories, contributing to our understanding of the structural processes of the whole period. We are also working to improve our visual display of the formal elements of these masses, taking the work of Lessoil-Daelman as an example, so that we can better summarise formal elements across the entire set of pieces. An encoding project of the Masses of Lassus and others is already in progress.

    REFERENCESAssayag, G., Dubnov, S., Delerue, O. "Guessing the Composer's Mind: Applying Universal Prediction to Musical Style". Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, pp. 496-9, 1999.R. Durbin, S. Eddy, A. Krogh, and G. Mitchison. Biological Sequence Analysis : Probabilistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Cambridge University Press, 1998.D. Gusfield. Algorithms on Strings, Trees, and Sequences. Cambridge University Press, 1997.J. A. Owens. Composers at Work. Oxford University Press, 1997.P. Schubert. "Mode and Counterpoint," in Music Theory and the Exploration of the Past. Ed. C. Bernstein and D. W. Hatch. University of Chicago Press, 1994.M. Lessoil-Daelman. Une approche synoptique des motifs et des modules dans la messe parodique. PhD dissertation, McGill University, 2002.C. Collins Judd. "Josquin des Prez: Salve Regina," in Music before 1600, ed. Mark Everist. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.C. Collins Judd. "Musical Commonplace Books, Writing Theory, and `Silent Listening': The Polyphonic Examples of Glarean's Dodecachordon," Musical Quarterly 82, pp. 482--516, 1998.C. Collins Judd, ed. Tonal Structures in Early Music. Garland Publishing, 1998.

    Frauke JurgensenCurrent position: Lecturer in Music, Univerity of Aberdeen, ScotlandMain field of research: MusicologyMain research areas: Renaissance compositional practice, performance practice, performanceRelevant qualifications: B. Hons. Mus. Theory and Composition, University of Western Ontario, L. Mus. Performance, McGill University, Ph.D. Musicology at McGill University (2005)Recent work: using computers to study the distribution of accidentals in the Buxheim Organ Book and its concordances, post-doctoral fellowship with Jessie Ann Owens on Palestrina. Talk at the Center for Computer-Assisted Research in the Humanities at Stanford University.Contact: [email protected]

    Ian KnopkeCurrent Position: Research Associate, Music Informatics, Indiana UniversityMain Field of Research: Music Information Retrieval / Computer MusicRelevant Qualifications: B.Mus Composition, M.A. Music Theory, University of Alberta; Ph.D. Music Technology, McGill UniversityRecent Work: computational musicology, algorithmic composition methods, location, indexing and searching of music on the Internet, and signal processing and synthesis of recorded audioContact: [email protected]

    CIM08 Abstract Proceedings, Thessaloniki, 3-6 July 2008

    87