45
1 - 1 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Operations and Productivity PowerPoint presentation to PowerPoint presentation to accompany accompany Heizer and Render Heizer and Render Operations Management, 10e Operations Management, 10e Principles of Operations Principles of Operations Management, 8e Management, 8e PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl

1 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 1 1 Operations and Productivity PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and Render

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

11 Operations and Productivity

Operations and Productivity

PowerPoint presentation to accompany PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and Render Heizer and Render Operations Management, 10e Operations Management, 10e Principles of Operations Management, 8ePrinciples of Operations Management, 8e

PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl

1 - 2© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

The Hard Rock CafeThe Hard Rock Cafe

First opened in 1971 Now – 129 restaurants in over 40 countries

Rock music memorabilia

Creates value in the form of good food and entertainment

3,500+ custom meals per day in Orlando

How does an item get on the menu?

Role of the Operations Manager

1 - 3© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

What Is Operations What Is Operations Management?Management?

ProductionProduction is the creation of goods and services

Operations management (OM)Operations management (OM) is the set of activities that create value in the form of

goods and services by transforming inputs into

outputs

1 - 4© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Organizing to Produce Organizing to Produce Goods and ServicesGoods and Services

Essential functions:

1.1. MarketingMarketing – generates demand

2.2. Production/operationsProduction/operations – creates the product

3.3. Finance/accountingFinance/accounting – tracks how well the organization is doing, pays bills, collects the money

1 - 5© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Organizational ChartsOrganizational Charts

OperationsGround support equipmentMaintenanceGround Operations Facility maintenance Catering Flight Operations Crew scheduling Flying Communications DispatchingManagement science

Finance/ accountingAccounting Payables Receivables General LedgerFinance Cash control International exchange

Airline

Figure 1.1(B)

MarketingTraffic administration Reservations Schedules Tariffs (pricing)SalesAdvertising

1 - 6© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

MarketingSales promotionAdvertisingSalesMarket research

Organizational ChartsOrganizational Charts

OperationsFacilities Construction; maintenance

Production and inventory control Scheduling; materials control

Quality assurance and controlSupply-chain managementManufacturing Tooling; fabrication; assembly

Design Product development and design Detailed product specifications

Industrial engineering Efficient use of machines, space, and personnel

Process analysis Development and installation of production tools and equipment

Finance/ accountingDisbursements/ credits Receivables Payables General ledgerFunds Management Money market International exchangeCapital requirements Stock issue Bond issue and recall

Manufacturing

Figure 1.1(C)

1 - 7© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Why Study OM?Why Study OM?1. OM is one of three major functions of

any organization, we want to study how people organize themselves for productive enterprise

2. We want (and need) to know how goods and services are produced

3. We want to understand what operations managers do

4. OM is such a costly part of an organization

1 - 8© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Options for Increasing Options for Increasing ContributionContribution

Table 1.1

Sales $100,000 $150,000 $100,000 $100,000Cost of Goods – 80,000 – 120,000 – 80,000 – 64,000Gross Margin 20,000 30,000 20,000 36,000Finance Costs – 6,000 – 6,000 – 3,000 – 6,000Subtotal 14,000 24,000 17,000 30,000Taxes at 25% – 3,500 – 6,000 – 4,250 – 7,500Contribution $ 10,500 $ 18,000 $ 12,750 $ 22,500

Finance/Marketing Accounting OM

Option Option Option

Increase Reduce ReduceSales Finance Production

Current Revenue 50% Costs 50% Costs 20%

1 - 9© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Ten Critical DecisionsTen Critical DecisionsTen Decision Areas Chapter(s)

1. Design of goods and services 52. Managing quality 6, Supplement 63. Process and capacity 7, Supplement 7

design 4. Location strategy 85. Layout strategy 96. Human resources and 10

job design 7. Supply-chain 11, Supplement 11

management8. Inventory, MRP, JIT 12, 14, 169. Scheduling 13, 1510. Maintenance 17 Table 1.2

1 - 10© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Where are the OM Jobs?Where are the OM Jobs? Technology/methods

Facilities/space utilization

Strategic issues

Response time

People/team development

Customer service

Quality

Cost reduction

Inventory reduction

Productivity improvement

1 - 11© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

OpportunitiesOpportunities

Figure 1.2

1 - 12© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

CertificationsCertifications APICS, the American Production and

Inventory Control Society

American Society of Quality (ASQ)

Institute for Supply Management (ISM)

Project Management Institute (PMI)

Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals

Charter Institute of Purchasing and Supply (CIPS)

1 - 13© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Significant Events in OMSignificant Events in OM

Figure 1.3

1 - 14© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

The Heritage of OMThe Heritage of OM Division of labor (Adam Smith 1776;

Charles Babbage 1852)

Standardized parts (Whitney 1800)

Scientific Management (Taylor 1881)

Coordinated assembly line (Ford/ Sorenson 1913)

Gantt charts (Gantt 1916)

Motion study (Frank and Lillian Gilbreth 1922)

Quality control (Shewhart 1924; Deming 1950)

1 - 15© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

The Heritage of OMThe Heritage of OM Computer (Atanasoff 1938)

CPM/PERT (DuPont 1957, Navy 1958)

Material requirements planning (Orlicky 1960)

Computer aided design (CAD 1970)

Flexible manufacturing system (FMS 1975)

Baldrige Quality Awards (1980)

Computer integrated manufacturing (1990)

Globalization (1992)

Internet (1995)

1 - 16© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Born 1863; died 1947

In 1903, created Ford Motor Company

In 1913, first used moving assembly line to make Model TUnfinished product moved by

conveyor past work station

Paid workers very well for 1911 ($5/day!)

Henry FordHenry Ford

1 - 17© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

W. Edwards DemingW. Edwards Deming

Born 1900; died 1993

Engineer and physicist

Credited with teaching Japan quality control methods in post-WW2

Used statistics to analyze process

His methods involve workers in decisions

1 - 18© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

New Challenges in OMNew Challenges in OM

Global focus

Just-in-time

Supply-chain partnering

Rapid product development, alliances

Mass customization

Empowered employees, teams

ToToFromFrom Local or national focus

Batch shipments

Low bid purchasing

Lengthy product development

Standard products

Job specialization

1 - 19© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Characteristics of GoodsCharacteristics of Goods Tangible product

Consistent product definition

Production usually separate from consumption

Can be inventoried

Low customer interaction

1 - 20© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Characteristics of ServiceCharacteristics of Service Intangible product

Produced and consumed at same time

Often unique

High customer interaction

Inconsistent product definition

Often knowledge-based

Frequently dispersed

1 - 21© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Industry and Services as Industry and Services as Percentage of GDPPercentage of GDP

Services Manufacturing

Au

stra

lia

Can

ada

Ch

ina

Cze

ch R

ep

Fra

nce

Ger

man

y

Ho

ng

Ko

ng

Jap

an

Mex

ico

Ru

ssia

n F

ed

So

uth

Afr

ica

Sp

ain

UK

US

90 −

80 −

70 −

60 −

50 −

40 −

30 −

20 −

10 −

0 −

1 - 22© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Goods and ServicesGoods and ServicesAutomobile

Computer

Installed carpeting

Fast-food meal

Restaurant meal/auto repair

Hospital care

Advertising agency/investment management

Consulting service/teaching

Counseling

Percent of Product that is a Good Percent of Product that is a Service

100% 75 50 25 0 25 50 75 100%| | | | | | | | |

1 - 23© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

120 –

100 –

80 –

60 –

40 –

20 –

0 –| | | | | | |

1950 1970 1990 2010 (est)1960 1980 2000

Em

plo

ymen

t (m

illi

on

s)

Manufacturing and Service Manufacturing and Service EmploymentEmployment

Figure 1.4 (A)

Manufacturing

ServiceService

1 - 24© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Manufacturing Employment Manufacturing Employment and Productionand Production

Figure 1.4 (B)

40 –

30 –

20 –

10 –

0 – | | | | | | |1950 1970 1990 2010 (est)

1960 1980 2000

– 150150

– 125125

– 100100

– 7575

– 5050

– 2525

– 00

Em

plo

ymen

t (m

illi

on

s)

In

dex

: 19

97 =

100

Ind

ex:

1997

= 1

00

Manufacturingemployment

(left scale)

Industrial Industrial productionproduction

(right scale)(right scale)

1 - 25© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

New Trends in OMNew Trends in OM Ethics

Global focus

Environmentally sensitive production

Rapid product development

Environmentally sensitive production

Mass customization

Empowered employees

Supply-chain partnering

Just-in-time performance

1 - 26© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Productivity ChallengeProductivity Challenge

Productivity is the ratio of outputs (goods and services) divided by the inputs

(resources such as labor and capital)

The objective is to improve productivity!The objective is to improve productivity!

Important Note!Production is a measure of output

only and not a measure of efficiency

1 - 27© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Feedback loop

Outputs

Goods and

services

Transformation

The U.S. economic system transforms inputs to outputs

at about an annual 2.5% increase in productivity per

year. The productivity increase is the result of a

mix of capital (38% of 2.5%), labor (10% of 2.5%), and

management (52% of 2.5%).

The Economic SystemThe Economic System

Inputs

Labor,capital,

management

Figure 1.6

1 - 28© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Improving Productivity at Improving Productivity at StarbucksStarbucks

A team of 10 analysts A team of 10 analysts continually look for ways continually look for ways to shave time. Some to shave time. Some improvements:improvements:

Stop requiring signatures on credit card purchases under $25

Saved 8 seconds per transaction

Change the size of the ice scoop

Saved 14 seconds per drink

New espresso machines Saved 12 seconds per shot

1 - 29© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Improving Productivity at Improving Productivity at StarbucksStarbucks

A team of 10 analysts A team of 10 analysts continually look for ways continually look for ways to shave time. Some to shave time. Some improvements:improvements:

Stop requiring signatures on credit card purchases under $25

Saved 8 seconds per transaction

Change the size of the ice scoop

Saved 14 seconds per drink

New espresso machines Saved 12 seconds per shot

Operations improvements have helped Starbucks increase yearly revenue per outlet by $200,000 to $940,000 in six years.

Productivity has improved by 27%, or about 4.5% per year.

1 - 30© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Measure of process improvement

Represents output relative to input

Only through productivity increases can our standard of living improve

ProductivityProductivity

Productivity =Units produced

Input used

1 - 31© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Productivity CalculationsProductivity Calculations

Productivity =Units produced

Labor-hours used

= = 4 units/labor-hour1,000

250

Labor ProductivityLabor Productivity

One resource input single-factor productivity

1 - 32© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Multi-Factor Productivity Multi-Factor Productivity

OutputLabor + Material + Energy + Capital + Miscellaneous

Productivity =

Also known as total factor productivity

Output and inputs are often expressed in dollars

Multiple resource inputs multi-factor productivity

1 - 33© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Collins Title ProductivityCollins Title Productivity

Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day

Old System:Old System:

=Old labor

productivity8 titles/day

32 labor-hrs

1 - 34© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Collins Title ProductivityCollins Title Productivity

Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day

Old System:Old System:

8 titles/day

32 labor-hrs=

Old labor productivity = .25 titles/labor-hr

1 - 35© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Collins Title ProductivityCollins Title Productivity

Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day

Old System:Old System:

14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day

New System:New System:

8 titles/day

32 labor-hrs=

Old labor productivity

=New labor

productivity

= .25 titles/labor-hr

14 titles/day14 titles/day

32 labor-hrs32 labor-hrs

1 - 36© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Collins Title ProductivityCollins Title Productivity

Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day

Old System:Old System:

14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day

New System:New System:

8 titles/day

32 labor-hrs=

Old labor productivity = .25 titles/labor-hr

14 titles/day

32 labor-hrs=

New labor productivity = .4375 titles/labor-hr

1 - 37© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Collins Title ProductivityCollins Title Productivity

Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day

Old System:Old System:

14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day

New System:New System:

=Old multifactor

productivity8 titles/day

$640 + 400

1 - 38© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Collins Title ProductivityCollins Title Productivity

Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day

Old System:Old System:

14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day

New System:New System:

8 titles/day

$640 + 400=

Old multifactor productivity = .0077 titles/dollar

1 - 39© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Collins Title ProductivityCollins Title Productivity

Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day

Old System:Old System:

14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day

New System:New System:

8 titles/day

$640 + 400=

Old multifactor productivity

=New multifactor

productivity

= .0077 titles/dollar

14 titles/day14 titles/day

$640 + 800$640 + 800

1 - 40© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Collins Title ProductivityCollins Title Productivity

Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day

Old System:Old System:

14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day

New System:New System:

8 titles/day

$640 + 400

14 titles/day

$640 + 800

=Old multifactor

productivity

=New multifactor

productivity

= .0077 titles/dollar

= .0097 titles/dollar

1 - 41© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Labor SkillsLabor Skills

About half of the 17-year-olds in the U.S. cannot About half of the 17-year-olds in the U.S. cannot correctly answer questions of this typecorrectly answer questions of this type

Figure 1.7

1 - 42© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Service ProductivityService Productivity

1. Typically labor intensive

2. Frequently focused on unique individual attributes or desires

3. Often an intellectual task performed by professionals

4. Often difficult to mechanize

5. Often difficult to evaluate for quality

1 - 43© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Productivity at Taco BellProductivity at Taco Bell

Improvements:

Revised the menu

Designed meals for easy preparation

Shifted some preparation to suppliers

Efficient layout and automation

Training and employee empowerment

New water and energy saving grills

1 - 44© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Productivity at Taco BellProductivity at Taco Bell

Improvements: Revised the menu

Designed meals for easy preparation

Shifted some preparation to suppliers

Efficient layout and automation

Training and employee empowerment

New water and energy saving grills

Results: Preparation time cut to 8 seconds

Management span of control increased from 5 to 30

In-store labor cut by 15 hours/day

Stores handle twice the volume with half the labor

Conserve 300 million gallons of water and Conserve 300 million gallons of water and 200 million KwH of electricity each year 200 million KwH of electricity each year saving $17 million annuallysaving $17 million annually

1 - 45© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Ethics andEthics andSocial ResponsibilitySocial Responsibility

Challenges facing Challenges facing operations managers:operations managers:

Developing and producing safe, quality products

Maintaining a clean environment

Providing a safe workplace

Honoring stakeholder commitments