27
RESEARCH AND OVERVIEW OF EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICES FOR AUTISM 1

1. 2 Research should clearly describe The intervention How the intervention differed from the control How the intervention is supposed to affect

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

1

RESEARCH AND OVERVIEW OF EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICES FOR AUTISM

Page 2: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

2

Page 3: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

3

WHAT IS GOOD RESEARCH?

Research should clearly describe

The intervention How the intervention differed from the control How the intervention is supposed to affect outcome. What actually happened, whether it was anticipated

or not

Page 4: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

4

RESEARCH BIAS

The best research will be in professional journals

When reading – who is funding the project

Look for independent research studies Look for current studies Approach .com website information

with caution

Page 5: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

5

HIERARCHY FOR STRENGTH OF EVIDENCE

Informed by research Established environmental variables Documentation of implementation

fidelity Documentation of intended and

unintended consequences

Page 6: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

6

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

A ranking used to describe the strength of the results measured in a research study

Level 1 (likely reliable) Evidence - representing the most valid reports addressing patient-oriented outcomes. Examples include rigorous randomized trial sand systematic reviews of level 1 evidence reports.

Level 2 (mid-level) Evidence - representing reports addressing patient-oriented outcomes, and using some method of scientific investigation, yet not meeting the quality criteria to achieve level 1 evidence labeling. Examples include randomized trials with less than 80% follow-up and non-randomized comparison studies Level 2 evidence does not imply reliable evidence.

Level 3 (lacking direct) Evidence - representing reports that are not based on scientific analysis of patient-oriented outcomes. Examples include case series, case reports, and expert opinion.

Page 7: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

7

INFORMED BY RESEARCH

Rigorous research designs Randomized experimental designs

Other acceptable designs Quasi-experimental designs Single subject studies

There are others. Refer to the CEC website on

www.cec.sped.org

Page 8: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

8

RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS

Randomized experimental designs place subjects in control and experimental groups through a random selection process. The experimental group receives the treatment and the control group does not. Typically, pre and post tests are given to each group, and then statistically compared to determine the potential effect of the treatment.

Page 9: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

9

SIMPLE PRE/POST TEST RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Group 1 (experimental group)R Observation Treatment

Observation

Group 2 (control group)R Observation -------

Observation

Page 10: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

10

QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS

A quasi-experimental design is a research study in which a group of subjects receives a treatment while another group does not. The key difference between this design, and an clear experimental design is the lack of random assignment.

Page 11: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

11

SINGLE SUBJECT DESIGNS

These research designs compare a subject’s performance on a target behavior with repeated measures of that behavior over time. In these designs, the individual is his/her own control group.

Page 12: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

12

Page 13: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

13

PICO WORKSHEET

Problem Intervention Comparison Outcome

Problem: What is the situation, issue, or individual that requires attention?

Intervention: What instructional approach, strategy, intervention is needed or suggested?

Comparison: What is the main (or other) alternative to the suggested approach?

Outcome: What do the data say about the suggested approach? Supporting literature for selected approach

Page 14: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

14

PDSA CYCLES

The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is shorthand for testing a change — by planning it, trying it, observing the results, and acting on what is learned. This is the scientific method, used for action-oriented learning.

Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 2010

Page 15: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

15

ESTABLISHED ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES

Quality research should clearly describe The intervention, including who

administered it, who received it, and what it cost,

How the intervention differed from what the control group received, and

The logic of how the intervention is supposed to affect outcomes.

Page 16: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

16

DOCUMENTATION OF IMPLEMENTATION FIDELITY

Implementation fidelity refers to the degree to which the intervention was delivered per the prescribed instructions or plan. In other words, did the “teacher” deliver the instruction as he/she was supposed to ??

Page 17: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

17

DOCUMENTATION OF INTENDED AND UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES

Good research will describe what actually happened, whether it was planned (intended) or not planned (unintended).

Page 18: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

18

EVIDENCE BASED RESEARCH

Empirically-supported practicesResearch-based interventions

Science-based servicesScience-verified practices

Refers to programs or techniques that are proven to work, and produce consistent, positive results…

(Waters, 2005)

Page 19: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

19

AN OPERATIONAL DEFINITION OF EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE

“Practices that are informed by research, in which the characteristics and consequences of environmental variables are empirically established and the relationship directly informs what a practitioner can do to produce a desired outcome.”

(Dunst, Trivette, & Cutspec, 2002, p. 3)

Page 20: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

20

A CLOSER LOOK….NATIONAL STANDARDS PROJECT

Page 21: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

21

NATIONAL STANDARDS REPORT (2009) - NAC

Page 22: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

22

Page 23: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

23

THE NATIONAL AUTISM CENTER’S NATIONAL STANDARDS REPORT

Established. Sufficient evidence is available to confidently determine that a treatment produces beneficial treatment effects for individuals on the autism spectrum. That is, these treatments are established as effective.

Emerging. Although one or more studies suggest that a treatment produces beneficial treatment effects for individuals with ASD, additional high quality studies must consistently show this outcome before firm conclusions can be drawn about treatment effectiveness.

Unestablished. There is little or no evidence to allow us to draw firm conclusions about treatment effectiveness with individuals with ASD. Additional research may show the treatment to be effective, ineffective, or harmful.

Ineffective/Harmful. Sufficient evidence is available to determine that a treatment is ineffective or harmful for individuals on the autism spectrum.

http://www.nationalautismcenter.org/pdf/NAC%20Standards%20Report.pdf

Page 24: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

24

Page 25: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

25

ESTABLISHED TREATMENTS

Antecedent Package Behavioral Package Comprehensive Behavioral Treatment for Young

Children Joint Attention Intervention Modeling Naturalistic Teaching Strategies Peer Training Package Pivotal Response Treatment Schedules Self-management Story-based Intervention Package

Page 26: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

26

EMERGING TREATMENTS

Augmentative and Alternative Communication Devices (AAC)

Cognitive Behavioral Intervention Package

Developmental Relationship-based Treatment

Exercise Exposure Package Imitation-based Interaction Initiation Training Language Training (Production) Language Training (Production

& Understanding) Massage/Touch Therapy Multi-component Package

Music Therapy Peer-mediated Instructional

Arrangement Picture Exchange

Communication Systems (PECS) Reductive Package Scripting Sign Instruction Social Communication

Intervention Social Skills Package Structured Teaching Technology-based Treatment Theory of Mind Training

Page 27: 1. 2 Research should clearly describe  The intervention  How the intervention differed from the control  How the intervention is supposed to affect

27

UNESTABLISHED TREATMENTS

Academic Interventions Use traditional teaching methods to improve academic

performance, including “special education” Auditory Integration Training Facilitated Communication

Using a keyboard of words or pictures, or a typing device to communicate with the help of a facilitator

Gluten- and Casein-Free Diet Sensory Integrative Package

Using all the senses as a means of addressing overstimulation or understimulation from the environment