Upload
lora-pierce
View
214
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
A Comparison of A Comparison of Phragmites Phragmites australisaustralis Control Measures in Control Measures in Wisconsin Coastal WetlandsWisconsin Coastal Wetlands
Devany PlentovichDevany Plentovich
29 September 200829 September 2008
2
Introduction
• Phragmites australis is out-competing common and rare native plants on Lake Michigan’s beaches & coastal wetlands.
• Current herbicide control methods are expensive and can harm rare and sensitive plant species.
• Follow-up monitoring is needed. – Are control methods effective?– Which treatments are most effective?– Do ecological benefits outweigh the costs?
3
Objectives
• Do control methods eradicate Phragmites?
• Which control method is most effective?
• What species of plants are present after treatment?– Are they native wetland species?
6
Site Treatment Plots Sub-plots
Long Tail Point Control 5 10Spray Only 5 10Spray/Mow 2 10Spray/Burn 5 10
Ridges Sanctuary Control 5 10Spray Only 5 10Spray/Mow 5 10
Peshtigo Harbor Control 3 10Spray Only 4 10Spray/Mow 1 10Spray/Burn 5 10
Seagull Bar Control 5 10Spray Only 3 10Spray/Mow 5 10Spray/Burn 5 10
Total 63 630
7
Methods
• Variables– Species richness – % cover (all species)– litter depth– Phragmites height
• August 2007
8
Results
• Treatment Effectiveness
– 89% of the treatment plots contained Phragmites.
– None of the treatment techniques were effective at eradicating Phragmites after one treatment.
9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
% P
hra
gm
ites
au
stra
lis
Control
Spray
Spray/Burn
Spray/Mow
ResultsWhich control treatment was most effective at controlling Phragmites australis?
• All treatment methods significantly reduced % P. australis (ANOVA, p < 0.001)
• The three control methods were not significantly different from each other (Tukey HSD, p > 0.05)
• All sites showed the same pattern of P. australis reduction, with the exception of Ridges.
A
BB B
10
Results
0
50
100
150
200
250
Ave
rag
e P
hra
gm
ites
Hei
gh
t
Control
Herbicide
Herbicide/Burn
Herbicide/Mow
B
CB
A
Which control treatment was most effective at controlling Phragmites australis?
Herbicide/mow significantly reduced height over other treatments and control (ANOVA, p < 0.001)
11
ResultsDoes species richness differ among treatments?
Herbicide/mow had significantly higher species richness than other treatments and control (ANOVA, p < 0.001)
AA
CB
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Sp
ecie
s R
ich
nes
s
Control
Spray
Spray/Burn
Spray/Mow
AB AB
C
12
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Control Spray Spray/Mow Spray/Burn
Sp
ecie
s R
ich
nes
s
ResultsEffects of treatment on species richness
Species richness in herbicide/burn was significantly higher at Long Tail.
Treatments at this site were applied in 2005 and 2006; others were treated in 2007.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Sp
ecie
s R
ich
nes
s
Long Tail
Ridges
Peshtigo
Seagull Bar
B
A
B B
13
Results
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
% C
ov
er
of
Na
tiv
e S
pe
cie
s
Control
Herbicide
Herbicide/Burn
Herbicide/Mow
BB
C
A
Effects of treatment on Mean % Cover of Native Species
Herbicide/burn had significantly higher species richness than other treatments and control (ANOVA, p < 0.001)
14
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
% C
ov
er
of
Na
tiv
e S
pe
cie
s
Long Tail
Ridges
Peshtigo
Seagull Bar
B
C
B
A
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 1 2 3 4
% C
ov
er
of
Na
tiv
e S
pe
cie
s
C H H/B H/M
ResultsEffects of treatment on Mean % Cover of Native Species
% Cover of Native Species in herbicide/burn was significantly higher at Longtail.
All treatments show the same patterns with the exception of Peshtigo.
Herbicide/Burn showed significant higher % cover of native species. The majority of the cover was Calamagrostis canadensis.
15
Review of Results
VariableHerbicide
OnlyHerbicide/
BurnHerbicide/
Mow
% P. australis
Average P. australis height
Species Richness
% Cover of Native Species
Green – performed bestYellow – performed acceptably
16
What types of plant species were present after Phragmites treatment?
Type Number
Total Species 139*
Native 111
Introduced 15
Invasive 13
* An additional 37 were not identified to the species level
17
Campanula aparinoides (7) Carex stricta (7)
Cicuta bulbifera (7) Cirsium muticum (8)
Eleocharis flavescens (8)* Epilobium leptophyllum (8)
Equisetum variegatum (7) Liparis loeselii (7)
Lobelia kalmii (9) Lysimachia thyrsiflora (7)
Parnassia glauca (8) Picea glauca (7)
Pilea fontana (7) Thuja occidentalis (9)
Zizania palustrus (8)
Results
• Wisconsin Floristic Quality Assessment– No significant differences with Floristic Quality Index or
Coefficient of Conservation– Indicated presence of highly desirable wetland plants
What plant species will return after treatment?
* Species of concern
18
Conclusions
• Eradication is not feasible with one application of these control methods.
• Adding a secondary treatment improved effectiveness
– Herbicide/mow showed significantly higher species richness (exception Long Tail).
– Herbicide/burn showed significantly higher % cover of native species.
19
Conclusions
• Native plant species are present to re-populate treated wetlands.
• Treatment soon after invasion is critical for restoration success.
• Long-term maintenance will be required to maintain native wetland vegetation.
20
Recommendations• Monitor Herbicide/mow and
Herbicide/burn treatments for 2-3 years.
• Evaluate Habitat 7 sensitivity for wetland plants.
• Continue to prioritize P. australis treatment for critical habitat.
• Include follow-up herbicide treatment for successive years in funding requests.
21
AcknowledgementsProject funding provided by Wisconsin Dept of Agriculture from:
• Lakeshore Natural Resource Partnership• Wisconsin Coastal Management Program
Matching funding provided by:• Department of Agriculture, Trade, & Consumer Protection• University of Wisconsin-Green Bay
22
Acknowledgements• Andy Hinickle - Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources• John Huff - Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources• Steve Leonard – Ridges Sanctuary• Mark Martin - Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources• Ursula Petersen – Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade, &
Consumer Protection• Gary VanVreede - US Fish and Wildlife
• Photos by Ridges Sanctuary, Gary VanVreede, Kathryn Corio, Devany Martin