Upload
jonathan-chase
View
217
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
ASSERTIVE COMMUNITY TREATMENT
2
Assertive Community Treatment (ACT)
Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is a self-contained mental health program made up of a multidisciplinary mental health staff, including a peer specialist, who works as a team to provide majority of the treatment, rehabilitation, and support services consumers need to achieve their goals
3
Target PopulationPersons with: Severe mental illness/psychotic disorders Significant functional impairments High-users of psychiatric hospitals SMI and High risk or history of criminal
justice involvement Inability to participate in traditional services
or those who do not engage in any mental health services
Coexisting substance abuse disorder Individuals with SMI who are homeless
4
Assertive Community Treatment -Highlights-
Recognized as an Evidence-Based Practice by SAMHSA
Treatment, Rehabilitation, and support Services 24/7.
Small Staff to Consumer Ratio (1:10) Majority of services delivered in community
locations/consumers’ residences Individualized, comprehensive and flexible
treatment, support, and rehabilitation services
Team members are direct providers of services
5
Required Services Service Coordination by an assigned
service coordinator/case manager 24 Hour Crisis Assessment and
Intervention Symptom Assessment and
Management Medication Prescription,
Administration, Monitoring, and Documentation
Dual Diagnosis Substance Abuse Services
6
Required Services – cont’d Employment Services Activities of Daily Living Social/Interpersonal Relationship
and Leisure-Time Skill Training Peer Support Services Support Services Education, Support, and
Consultation to Families
7
ACT Staff Requirements
Position Urban Rural
Team Leader 1 FTE 1FTE
Psychiatrist 16 hrs for 50 consumers
16 hours for 50 consumers
RN 3 FTE 2 FTE
Peer Splst 1 FTE 1 FTE
Masters level 4 FTE 2 FTE
Other level 1-3 FTE 1.5 – 2.5 FTE
Pgm/Adm Asst
1 – 1.5 FTE 1 FTE
8
ACT Outcomes
Individuals in ACT……• Less Symptomatic• Spend significantly more time in
independent living• Earn more income from competitive
work• Better social relationships• Greater satisfaction with life
9
Comparison ACT versus TCM
ACT TCM
Multidisciplinary Team Individual CM
Primary provider of treatment, rehabilitation, and support
Provides linkage to many services
24-Hour coverage with ACT on-call
After hours on-call/crisis services
Low staff-to-consumer ratio(1:10)
High staff –to-consumer ratio(1:30)
10
Pennsylvania ACT History Community Treatment Team (CTT) was
designed in 1995 as PA’s model of ACT CTT was included in the Medicaid state
plan before it was eliminated due to lack of statewide implementation
Programs emerged in Philadelphia and the Lehigh Valley in response to SMH discharges.
11
PA ACT Background – cont’d Draft Bulletin (’95) describes CTT as
modeled after ACT and PACT Draft regulations (’95) on CTT CTT Program Standards distributed to
MCO’s as guide 34 Teams in 14 Counties in PA as of
9/06- 10 identify as ACT Serves about 2200 consumers
12
Assertive Community Treatment WHY NOW?
“A Call for Change: Toward a Recovery - Oriented Mental Health Service System for Adults” provided the philosophical framework for the transformation of the Commonwealth’s mental health service delivery system
13
ACT – Why Now? – cont’d The subsequent follow-up white paper
titled “Strategies for Promoting Recovery and Resilience and Implementing Evidence Based Practices" issued in October 2006 reinforced the state’s commitment to actively support the development of Evidence Based Practices (EBP)
14
ACT Forum – Feb 23, 2007 A meeting of about 150 individuals
including provider agencies, County MH/MR offices, Managed Care Organizations, NAMI affiliates, Consumers/Family Members.
The keynote presenter was a nationally recognized ACT consultant from Oklahoma
The goal of this forum was to provide information about developing, implementing, and monitoring ACT programs that would conform to the fidelity standards
15
ACT Forum Outcomes Outcomes included better
understanding of the following ACT-related items:
How to plan for the start-up and implementation of ACT teams
The need for fidelity to National ACT standards for improved outcomes
The need for data collection and on-going evaluation of ACT teams
16
ACT Forum Outcomes –cont’d
How to monitor and sustain ACT teams
While there are still some concerns for the providers who currently provide services similar to ACT, there was a clear willingness among most of the provider agencies to at least try to move in the direction of fidelity
Most importantly, this forum served as the launching pad for the state’s initiative to promote Assertive Community Treatment.
17
Next Steps Development and Issuance of Assertive
Community Treatment Bulletin – May 31,2007
OMHSAS Advisory Committee to identify representatives for future ACT workgroup/steering committee – June 30, 2007
Hire ACT consultant and identify TA deliverables for FY 2007/2008 – June 30, 2007
18
Next Steps – cont’d Create RFP process for developing two
new ACT teams and phase-out conversion of two CTTs in FY 2007/08
Draft RFP by July 15 Issue RFP by August 15 Projects Selection by November
15
19
Next Steps – cont’d Create an OMHSAS ACT
Workgroup/Steering Committee – August 2007
Identify full-time State ACT lead person – August 2007
Conduct a 1-day follow-up meeting with all PA ACT/CTT providers, potential developers, counties, and MCOs – August 2007 (after RFP is issued)
20
Next Steps – cont’d Begin training and TA for the four teams
selected thru the RFP process – November 2007
Consider developing a State Plan Amendment for ACT – FY 2008/2009