18
1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst [email protected] Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager [email protected]

1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst [email protected] Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst peter_j_goodwin@amat.com Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager surendra_meduri@amat.com

1

Blade WorkstationProof of Concept and Pilot

Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst [email protected]

Surendra Meduri - Technical [email protected]

Page 2: 1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst peter_j_goodwin@amat.com Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager surendra_meduri@amat.com

About Applied Materials

Company Profile

Applied Materials, Inc. (*Nasdaq: AMAT) is the global leader in nanomanufacturing technology solutions with a

broad portfolio of innovative equipment, service and software products for the fabrication of semiconductor chips,

flat panel displays, solar photovoltaic cells, flexible electronics and energy efficient glass. At Applied Materials, we

apply nanomanufacturing technology to improve the way people live.

Founded in 1967, Applied Materials creates and commercializes the nanomanufacturing technology that helps

produce virtually every semiconductor chip and flat panel displays in the world. The company recently entered the

market for equipment to produce solar arrays and energy efficient glass.

Applied Materials service products improve yield enhancement and increase nanomanufacturing productivity.

To support our customers, Applied Materials employs approximately 14,500 people throughout the world. In fiscal

year 2007, Applied Materials recorded revenues of approximately U.S. $9.73 billion.

For more information visit www.amat.com

Page 3: 1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst peter_j_goodwin@amat.com Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager surendra_meduri@amat.com

Introduction

Applied Materials has a complex multisite

implementation of TeamCenter Engineering to ensure

optimum performance for the user, but repeated

transfers between sites can sometimes cause data

integrity issues.

A number of users engaged in cross site collaboration

were spending a significant amount of time

transferring files back and forth between sites.

Page 4: 1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst peter_j_goodwin@amat.com Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager surendra_meduri@amat.com

Applied Materials Site Configuration

Multisite Architecture with sites in:

Santa Clara, CA

Austin, TX

Boise, ID

Xi’An, China

Bangalore, India

Users in Santa Clara would begin a design, then that evening a designer in Bangalore would pull the design to their local site so they could continue to

work on it, then the original designer would pull it back to Santa Clara and so on

Page 5: 1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst peter_j_goodwin@amat.com Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager surendra_meduri@amat.com

Issues

Traditional Remote Desktop solutions such as RDC

are fine for modifying structures in PSE and other non-

graphically intense actions, but lack the graphics

response required for effective CAD use.

Web based solutions such as eMeeting also lack the

graphics performance necessary for effective

collaboration.

Page 6: 1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst peter_j_goodwin@amat.com Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager surendra_meduri@amat.com

Proof of Concept Details

In the second half of 2007 Applied Materials conducted a Proof

of Concept evaluation of HP’s Blade Workstations and Remote

Graphics Software for use in the remote access of CAD data

from TeamCenter Engineering

8 Blade Workstations were installed in a Test Lab adjacent to the

main Data Center in Austin, TX which houses the TeamCenter

servers, along with a virtual server running software to manage

user access to the blades. This allowed the workstations to take

advantage of the Gigabit network within the datacenter.

Page 7: 1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst peter_j_goodwin@amat.com Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager surendra_meduri@amat.com

What are Blade Workstations?

They function as remote workstations, users log in remotely via a

custom graphics client, all applications are executed on the blade, with

the users system acting as a graphics terminal.

Page 8: 1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst peter_j_goodwin@amat.com Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager surendra_meduri@amat.com

Blade Workstation Configuration

Dual Xeon 5160 processors @ 3.0 GHz

4 GB Memory

nVidia Quadro FX 1600M Graphics

OS – Windows XP SP2

Installed applications

TeamCenter Portal 9.1.3

UG-NX 3

HP Remote Graphics Sender

Page 9: 1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst peter_j_goodwin@amat.com Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager surendra_meduri@amat.com

HP Remote Graphics Software (RGS)

RGS uses proprietary graphics algorithms in

conjunction with dedicated graphics hardware to provide

the graphics performance required for CAD

applications.

Page 10: 1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst peter_j_goodwin@amat.com Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager surendra_meduri@amat.com

Session Allocation Manager

Session Allocation Manager (SAM) is a software application run on a separate server that controls access to the Blade Workstations. Users log in thru a small client program installed on their PCs.

Page 11: 1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst peter_j_goodwin@amat.com Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager surendra_meduri@amat.com

Workstation Management

Workstations can be assigned to groups, and users assigned to that group will be routed to the next available workstation in the group. This allows the administrator to ensure availability within groups while reducing the number of workstations required.

Users can also be assigned to a specific workstation, effectively removing that workstation from the pool, but guaranteeing the user always has a workstation available.

Page 12: 1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst peter_j_goodwin@amat.com Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager surendra_meduri@amat.com

Functionality Testing

Testing performed in a lab environment in Santa Clara,

CA using 3 standard computer configurations deployed at

Applied Materials (2 desktop, 1 laptop)

Laptop also tested from an external location using VPN

Machine Specifications

Desktop – Dual 2.13 Ghz Core 2 Duo E6400, 2GB, Nvidia Quadro4 FX1400 128MB

Engineering – Dual 2.33 GHz Xeon 5140, 2GB, Nvidia Quadro 4 FX1400 128MB

Laptop – 2.0 Ghz Core 2 Duo T7200, 2 GB, ATI Mobility Fire GL V5250 128MB

Page 13: 1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst peter_j_goodwin@amat.com Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager surendra_meduri@amat.com

Measurements

Log in time

3D Model load time

Small model – 40 parts

Medium model – 344 parts

Large model – 689 parts

Page 14: 1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst peter_j_goodwin@amat.com Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager surendra_meduri@amat.com

Results

All tests results are the average of at least three tests performed on different days and at different hours of the day.

 

Santa Clarato

Santa Clara

Santa Clara to Austin

Santa Clara to

Austin Blade

Santa Clara to

Santa Clara

Santa Clara to

Austin

Santa Clara to

Austin Blade

  Desktop Laptop

Login 27s 9m46s 21s 27s 9m15s 18s

Open - Small 1m10s 8m30s 1m21s 1m35s 6m08s 1m05s

Open - Medium 4m 40m52s 3m53s 4m42s 40m53s 3m17s

Open - Large 5m55s 1h22m 4m49s 6m31s 1h27m 4m22s

  Engineering Desktop Laptop VPN

Login 18s 9m36s 26s 5m35s 3m32s 19s

Open - Small 36s 7m49s 38s 6m52s 9m13s 1m17s

Open - Medium 3m15s 40m15s 1m46s 54m01s 1h04m 2m58s

Open - Large 5m25s 1h19m 3m17s 1h40m 1h 53m 4m 17

Page 15: 1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst peter_j_goodwin@amat.com Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager surendra_meduri@amat.com

Conclusions

HP Blade Workstations provide login and model load

times as well as graphics performance equivalent to

local access for the following scenarios

Users who need to move between locations.

Users can disconnect from the blade session without

logging off, and reconnect again at their destination.

Users assigned to locations remote from the TeamCenter

server.

Users working remotely via VPN.

Page 16: 1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst peter_j_goodwin@amat.com Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager surendra_meduri@amat.com

Open Issues

UG-NX Customizations are not transferred from user to

Blade.

Printer mappings do not carry over from user to Blade.

Some USB devices are not initially recognized, and must

be disconnected and reconnected.

Older hardware requires BIOS update to fully utilize

remote capabilities.

Page 17: 1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst peter_j_goodwin@amat.com Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager surendra_meduri@amat.com

Next Steps

A Pilot involving 32 Blades is currently underway.

Initial User response has been very encouraging.

A Proof of Concept demonstrating Design Supplier

collaboration will be starting shortly.

Will allow designers to collaborate with outside experts

without exporting design information beyond the firewall.

Page 18: 1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst peter_j_goodwin@amat.com Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager surendra_meduri@amat.com

18