Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
-109-
4.キャパシティ・アセスメント調査結果
1 CA 1
1.1
1.1.1
2 2009 9 1 2010 5 2
8 C/P
a. 3R
a.1 On-site (community) project :I.1.1 I.1.12
1 1 Expert A 4 6 C/P
2 1 Expert B 2
9 I.1.10
I.1.11
I.1.10 C/P
C/P
I.1.11 1 C/P
No. of C/Prated
Ave.Rate
No. ofC/P
Ave.Rate
No. of C/Prated
Ave.Rate
No. ofC/P
Ave.Rate
I.1.1 5 per. 3.40 0 per. - 3.40 5 per. 4.00 7 per. 3.71 3.85 13.2%I.1.2 6 per. 4.00 0 per. - 4.00 5 per. 4.00 7 per. 4.43 4.21 5.3%I.1.3 6 per. 3.83 0 per. - 3.83 5 per. 4.00 7 per. 4.43 4.21 9.9%I.1.4 5 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 0 per. - 7 per. 3.71 3.71 23.7%I.1.5 5 per. 3.80 0 per. - 3.80 5 per. 4.00 7 per. 4.14 4.07 7.1%I.1.6 5 per. 3.80 0 per. - 3.80 5 per. 4.00 7 per. 3.86 3.92 3.2%I.1.7 5 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 0 per. - 7 per. 4.00 4.00 33.3%I.1.8 5 per. 3.20 0 per. - 3.20 0 per. - 7 per. 3.86 3.86 20.5%I.1.9 5 per. 2.00 0 per. - 2.00 0 per. - 7 per. 2.43 2.43 21.4%I.1.10 6 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 7 per. 2.71 0 per. - 2.71 -9.5%I.1.11 6 per. 3.33 0 per. - 3.33 2 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 -10.0%I.1.12 4 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 2 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 0.0%
Rate ofIncrease (%)
1st 2nd
Second Rating (May 2010)Rate by Expert A Rate by Expert B Combind
RateCode
First Rating (September 2009)
CombindRate
Rate by Expert A Rate by Expert B
Notes 1) “No. of C/P rated” C/P LCC NTC2)“Ave. rate” “No. of C/P rated” I.1.1 A 5 3.40 5
3)“Combined Rate” A B2009 9 A A
1
-110-
a.2 On-site (pilot project site) project :I.2.1 I.2.5
1 1 4 6 C/P
2 1
1
I.2.1 I2.4 C/P 6 2 1 7
I.2.5 JCC 2 LCC
NTC 1
No. of C/Prated
Ave.Rate
No. ofC/P
Ave.Rate
No. of C/Prated
Ave.Rate
No. ofC/P
Ave.Rate
I.2.1 6 per. 3.33 0 per. - 3.33 7 per. 3.43 0 per. - 3.43 2.9%I.2.2 6 per. 3.33 0 per. - 3.33 7 per. 3.43 0 per. - 3.43 2.9%I.2.3 6 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 7 per. 3.57 0 per. - 3.57 19.0%I.2.4 6 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 7 per. 3.86 0 per. - 3.86 28.6%I.2.5 4 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 2 per. 4.00 0 per. - 4.00 33.3%
Rate by Expert A Rate by Expert B CombindRate
Rate by Expert A Rate by Expert B CombindRate
Code
First Rating (September 2009) Second Rating (May 2010) Rate ofIncrease (%)
1st 2nd
Notes 1) “No. of C/P rated” C/P LCC NTC2)“Ave. rate” “No. of C/P rated” I.2.1 A 6 3.33 6
3)“Combined Rate” A B1 2 A A
a.3 Off-site (green waste) project :I.3.1 I.3.6
Off-site (green waste) project
2 1 C/P(LCC)
3
3R 3 Off-site (green waste) project :I.3.1 I.3.6
No. of C/Prated
Ave.Rate
No. ofC/P
Ave.Rate
No. of C/Prated
Ave.Rate
No. ofC/P
Ave.Rate
I.3.1 0 per. - 0 per. - - 1 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 -I.3.2 0 per. - 0 per. - - 1 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 -I.3.3 0 per. - 0 per. - - 1 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 -I.3.4 0 per. - 0 per. - - 1 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 -I.3.5 0 per. - 0 per. - - 1 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 -I.3.6 0 per. - 0 per. - - 1 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 -
Rate by Expert A Rate by Expert B CombindRate
Rate by Expert A Rate by Expert B CombindRate
Code
First Rating (September 2009) Second Rating (May 2010) Rate ofIncrease (%)
1st 2nd
Notes 1) “No. of C/P rated” C/P LCC NTC2)“Ave. rate” “No. of C/P rated”3)“Combined Rate” A B
A 2010 5 A
b. :I.4.1 I.4.4
1 2 1
1 C/P
-111-
2 1 C/P C/P
1
I.4.1 33.3%I.4.2 33.3%I.4.3 25.0%I.4.4 12.5%
First Rating (September 2009) Second Rating (May 2010) Rate ofIncrease(%) 1st
2nd
2 per. 5.002 per. 4.50
2 per. 4.002 per. 4.00
1 per. 4.001 per. 4.00
1 per. 3.001 per. 3.00
Rate by Expert C
No. of C/P rated Ave. Rate
Rate by Expert C
No. of C/P rated Ave. RateCode
1.1.2
LCC NTC 2009 1 2010 1
CA-2 CA-2
a. LCC
O.2
O.4
O.9 3R O.10 3R
3R
3R O.9 C/P
b. NTC
NTC Tunalia O.4
DOE
O.2
C/P O.7
CEO
3 2
LCC 3R O.9 3R
-112-
O.10 O.9 15
3R 3R
O.10
NTC JICA
C/P1 2009 1 2 2010 1
O.2 NTC 4 5 Tunalia
LCC
Vunato 2009 8
O.4
NTCTunalia
4.0haTunalia
DOE
LCC1 1 1 1
1 10 11
O.5
NTC 1 1 10
O.7 NTC Department of Health6
3 2
LCCDistrictO.9 3R
NTC 15 3R
LCCNTC
3R 23R
3R /O.10
3R
NTC 3R
1.1.3
a.
2009 9 1 2010 4 2 Field40 123 Matavolivoli
163
3
4
4 1 2
CA-3
-113-
a.1
i) Current waste management Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators
S.1.1 -In general, do you think that improper waste management causes problems?
No
S.1.2 -What kinds of problems are there?
S.1.3-Do you think that waste that your household produces contributes to these problems?
F40 1 2Yes No
S.1.4 -What do you think is the cause of these problems?
S.1.5-Does anyone in your household pick up rubbish from the sidewalk or public areas?
Yes, almost dailyNo
S.1.6-If you found a place that may need grass cutting in the sidewalk or public areas, what would you do?
Note. F40 Field 40, Mata: Matavolivoli
5 S.1.3
Field 40 1 2 Yes No
2
2
a.2
ii) Green waste collection service Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators
S.2.1 -Do you generate green waste (garden waste, off-cuts from plants and trees)?
Yes F40 Mata
S.2.2-The JICA Project has been collecting green waste at FJD 3 or 5 per 1.0 cubic meter in cooperation with Council. Did you know about this service?
Yes
S.2.3 -Have you ever paid for the green waste collection service? No
S.2.4 -How do you discharge green waste? Mata
Note. F40 Field 40, Mata: Matavolivoli
S.2.2
S.2.3 No
S.2.4 Matavolivoli
NTC 2009 1
Matavolivoli
-114-
a.3
iii) Recyclables collection service Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators
S.3.1
-Do you know the collection service of the recyclables including PET bottles, plastics, tin cans, aluminum & steel cans and spray cans, metal, paper, cardboard, grass bottles and jars, and old clothes, that are collected once a week by Council as a part of the JICA Project?
Yes
S.3.2-Have you ever used the collection service of the recyclables that are collected once a week by Council as a part of the JICA Project?
1F40
S.3.3 -Would you like to continue to support in the recyclables collection service?
Yes, very much
S.3.4 -Why would you like to continue to support in the recyclables collection service?
F40 Mata
S.3.5 -Why would you not like to continue to support in the recyclables collection service?
S.3.6 -Why do you not participate in the collection service? Mata
7Note. F40 Field 40, Mata: Matavolivoli
S.1.1
1 1
S.3.2
S.3.6 Matavolivoli
1 2
7
a.4
iv) Current status of home composting Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators
S.4.1-The JICA Project handed over a composter to the households that wanted it in five dollars. Did you get the composter from the JICA Project?
No
S.4.2 -Would you like to continue to use the composter? YesS.4.3 -Why would you like to continue to use the composter?
S.4.4 -Why would you not like to continue to use the composter?
S.4.5 -Would you like to own a composter? NoF40
Note. F40 Field 40, Mata: Matavolivoli
S.4.5 No Field 40
-115-
1.1.4
1.1.4 2009 1 2010 1
CA-4 3R
1.2
1.2.1
a. 2
2009 9 C/P
3R
CA
C/P
C/P
b.
C/P3R 2
3R LCC NTC 7LCC 3
c.
C/P 3R
CA
d.
2009 10 1 3 2011 2
4
-116-
1) On-site (community) project i) Communication and presentation in the community meetingCode Inquiry Items/ Indicators
I.1.1 -The C/P can regularly hold (plan) a community meeting or make home visits in a community for promoting the 3R activities of the Project.
I.1.2 -The C/P can speak in a clear and firm tone of voice in a community meeting or when he or she explains to community residents during a home visit.
I.1.3 -The C/P can make the meeting participants understood the purpose of a community meeting or make residents understood the purpose of home visit.
I.1.4 -The C/P can hear opinions from more participants in a community meeting or from residents through home visit.
I.1.5 -The C/P can create a relaxed atmosphere in which more participants can voice their opinions in a community meeting or in which residents can voice their opinions during the home visit by the Project team.
I.1.6 -The C/P can properly make a presentation using the materials (instructions of composting, environmental education material, etc.) in a community meeting or during a home visit.
I.1.7 -The C/P can appropriately solve the problems raised in a community meeting or during a home visit. I.1.8 -The C/P can wrap up discussions on the meeting agendas or meeting results.
I.1.9 -The C/P can take minutes of a community meeting (M/M), including attendance list or summarize the results of home visits.
ii) Preparation of the material for the community meeting Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators
I.1.10-The C/P can prepare the materials (instructions of composting, environmental education material, etc.) for the community meeting or home visit.
iii) Reporting Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators I.1.11 -The C/P can report his or her activity in the community project at weekly meetings. I.1.12 -The C/P can report their progress of the community project at JCC meetings.
2) On-site (pilot project site) project
i) Instruction Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators I.2.1 -The C/P can properly instruct the trainees to be able to work for the on-site project (pilot site project).
ii) Training arrangement Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators I.2.2 -The C/P can prepare the instruction materials for the trainees of the on-site project (pilot site project).
I.2.3 -The C/P can collect trainees and prepare necessary materials such as fuel or equipment (excepting one provided by JICA) for the on-site project (pilot site project).
iii) Reporting Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators I.2.4 -The C/P can report his or her activity in on site project (pilot site project) at weekly meetings. I.2.5 -The C/P can report their progress of on site project (pilot site project) at JCC meetings.
3) Off-site (Green Waste) project
i) Communication Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators
I.3.1 -The C/P can properly explain about the objectives of the green waste project to the external organizations which may be concerned (e.g. FSC, SPF, market, private company, and hotel).
I.3.2 -The C/P can hear opinions from more external organizations which may be concerned.
I.3.3 -The C/P can appropriately solve the issues raised in the discussion with the external organizations which may be concerned.
I.3.4 -The C/P can suggest to JET about the better way for working with the external organizations which may be concerned.
ii) Reporting Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators I.3.5 -The C/P can report his or her activity in the green waste project at weekly meetings. I.3.6 -The C/P can report their progress of the green waste project at JCC meetings.
-117-
i) Management Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators
I.4.1 -The C/P can do management for the improvement including buffer zone and divider constructions, access road rehabilitation, periphery bank and drain works to be proceeded as planned.
I.4.2 - The C/P can properly do landfill management.
ii) Reporting Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators I.4.3 -The C/P can report his or her activity in the Landfill Management Project at weekly meetings. I.4.4 -The C/P can report his or her activity in the Landfill Management Project at JCC meetings.
e.
1 5 13 5
Scale Notes5 Yes, very much well, not have to give any advice to the C/P 4 Yes, very well, but need giving a little bit of advice to the C/P 3 Feel well, but need some advice to the C/P 2 Not very well, need giving much advice to the C/P 1 Not well at all, the C/P needs much time to learn this item
1.2.2
a. 2
CA
1 3R
2
2
SWM
SWM SWM 3R 3R
Code Indicator GeneralO.1 -Population and area Technical aspect O.2 -Collection and haulage O.3 -Public area cleansing O.4 -Final disposal O.5 -Equipment and maintenance Management system for Solid Waste Management O.6 -SWM system at the National Level O.7 -SWM system at the local level O.8 -Financial status of SWM C/P side’s awareness on 3R O.9 -Dissemination of 3R experience to other local governments
O.10 -Documentation of knowledge and experience in 3R promotion
-118-
b.
LCC NTC O.1 O.10O.6 O.9 O.10 DOE
c.
2009 10 11 1 3 2009 1
1
1.2.3
a.
Field 40 Matavolivoli2009 9
286 Field 40 123 Matavolivoli 163
b.
3R
1) Social aspect i) Current waste management Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators S.1.1 -In general, do you think that improper waste management causes problems? S.1.2 -What kinds of problems are there? S.1.3 -Do you think that waste that your household produces contributes to these problems? S.1.4 -What do you think is the cause of these problems? S.1.5 -Does anyone in your household pick up rubbish from the sidewalk or public areas? S.1.6 -If you found a place that may need grass cutting in the sidewalk or public areas, what would you do? ii) Green waste collection service S.2.1 -Do you generate green waste (garden waste, off-cuts from plants and trees)?
S.2.2 -The JICA Project has been collecting green waste at FJD 3 or 5 per 1.0 cubic meter in cooperation with Council. Did you know about this service?
S.2.3 -Have you ever paid for the green waste collection service? S.2.4 -How do you discharge green waste? iii) Recyclables collection service
S.3.1-Do you know the collection service of the recyclables including PET bottles, plastics, tin cans, aluminum & steel cans and spray cans, metal, paper, cardboard, grass bottles and jars, and old clothes, that are collected once a week by Council as a part of the JICA Project?
S.3.2 -Have you ever used the collection service of the recyclables that are collected once a week by Council as a part of the JICA Project?
S.3.3 -Would you like to continue to support in the recyclables collection service? S.3.4 -Why would you like to continue to support in the recyclables collection service? S.3.5 -Why would you not like to continue to support in the recyclables collection service? S.3.6 -Why do you not participate in the collection service? iv) Current status of home composting
S.4.1 -The JICA Project handed over a composter to the households that wanted it in five dollars. Did you get the composter from the JICA Project?
S.4.2 -Would you like to continue to use the composter? S.4.3 -Why would you like to continue to use the composter?
-119-
S.4.4 -Why would you not like to continue to use the composter? S.4.5 -Would you like to own a composter?
c.
2 9 2009 9 1
3 2011 2 4
1.2.4
2009 10 11 1 3
2009 10 11 1 3 2009 1
1
i) Policy at the National Level Code Inquiry Items IS.1.1 -Statement on 3R promotion in the National Waste Management Policy
ii) Legal System on Waste Management IS.2.1 -Legal System at the National Level IS.2.2 -Legal System at the Local Level
-120-
5.ラウトカ処分場一部改善 PPの状況
-121-
6.住民啓発、環境教材
-122-
-123-
-124-
-125-
7.外部リソースとの連携
JOCV
JOCV
NGO
-126-
8.評価グリッドに沿った調査結果概要
-127-
-128-
-129-
-130-
-131-
-132-
-133-
-134-
-135-
9.質問票フォーマット
9-1 専門家用質問票
-136-
-137-
-138-
-139-
-140-
-141-
-142-
9-2 C/P用質問票Q
uest
ionn
aire
for
Coun
terp
arts
of F
iji M
id-t
erm
Rev
iew
Nam
e:
Posi
tion
Job
Resp
onsi
bilit
ies
:
Perio
d of
you
ras
sign
men
t:
QUE
STIO
NS
SUB-
QUE
STIO
NS
12
34
0RE
ASO
N(S
)/CO
MM
ENTS
0.1.
1 A
s fo
r ac
tiviti
es y
ou w
ere
enga
ged
in, d
o yo
u th
ink
that
pla
nned
act
iviti
esw
ere
carr
ied
out s
moo
thly
for
the
1st f
isca
l yea
r (O
ct. 2
008
Mar
. 200
9) ?
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Not
App
licab
le
0.1.
2 I
f the
y w
ere
not,
wha
t wer
e th
e pr
oble
ms?
0.1.
3 H
ow d
id y
ou c
ope
with
them
?
0.1.
4 A
s fo
r ac
tiviti
es y
ou w
ere
enga
ged
in, d
o yo
u th
ink
that
pla
nned
act
iviti
esw
ere
carr
ied
out s
moo
thly
for
the
2nd
fisca
l yea
r (Ap
r. 2
009
Up to
now
)?N
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soN
a
0.1.
5 I
f the
y w
ere
not,
wha
t wer
e th
e pr
oble
ms?
0.1.
6 H
ow d
id y
ou c
ope
with
them
?
0.2.
1. A
re y
ou s
atis
fied
with
the
tech
nica
l tra
nsfe
r/ad
vise
from
JICA
exp
erts
you
are
wor
king
toge
ther
, in
term
s of
its
cont
ent,
trai
ning
leng
th o
f tim
e, h
is/h
er te
achi
ngm
etho
dolo
gy, e
tc. ?
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Na
0.2.
2 To
mak
e th
e te
chni
cal t
rans
fer
mor
e ef
fect
ive,
if y
ou h
ave
any
sugg
estio
nsan
d re
ques
ts to
the
JICA
expe
rt, p
leas
e ex
plai
n.
0.3.
1 H
ave
you
cond
ucte
d th
e m
onito
ring
of p
roje
ct a
ctiv
ities
?If
you
have
con
duct
ed th
e m
onito
ring,
how
oft
en h
ave
you
done
?N
ever
Rare
ly1~
2 tim
esRe
gula
rlyN
aFr
eque
ncy:
0.3.
2 W
hen
you
cond
uct t
he m
onito
ring,
hav
e yo
u al
way
s re
ferr
ed to
the
Proj
ect
Des
ign
Mat
rix (P
DM
) of t
his
Proj
ect?
Nev
erRa
rely
1-2
times
Regu
larly
Na
0.3.
3 D
o yo
u th
ink
that
the
curr
ent m
onito
ring
syst
em is
app
ropr
iate
?N
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soN
a
0.3.
4. If
you
hav
e an
y co
mm
ents
/ s
ugge
stio
ns o
n cu
rren
t mon
itorin
g sy
stem
,pl
ease
exp
lain
.
0.4.
1.W
ho c
ould
be
the
first
per
son
to c
onta
ct w
hen
you
com
e ac
ross
the
prob
lem
in c
arry
ing
out p
roje
ct a
ctiv
ities
?
04.2
.Wha
t are
the
diff
icul
ties
you
have
exp
erie
nced
in th
e de
cisi
on m
akin
g to
car
ryou
t pro
ject
act
iviti
es?
0.4.
3 If
you
have
any
com
men
ts/s
ugge
stio
ns o
n th
e cu
rren
t dec
isio
n m
akin
gpr
oces
s, p
leas
e ex
plai
n.
0. Im
plem
enta
tion
Proc
ess
0.1
Impl
emen
tatio
nPr
oces
s.
0.4
Dec
isio
nM
akin
g Pr
oces
s
0.2.
Tec
hnic
alTr
ansf
er
0.3
Mon
itorin
g of
proj
ect
impl
emen
tatio
n
-143-
QUE
STIO
NS
SUB-
QUE
STIO
NS
12
34
0RE
ASO
N(S
)/CO
MM
ENTS
0. Im
plem
enta
tion
Proc
ess
0.5.
1. D
o yo
u th
ink
that
you
hav
e ha
d a
good
rel
atio
nshi
p (o
r m
aint
aine
d a
good
com
mun
icat
ion)
with
JICA
exp
erts
who
m y
ou a
re w
orki
ng to
geth
er?
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
good
Very
goo
dD
iffic
ult t
oju
dge
0.5.
2. If
you
wan
t to
furt
her
impr
ove
the
rela
tions
hip
with
them
, wha
t do
you
thin
kne
eds
to b
e do
ne?
0.5.
3. D
o yo
u th
ink
that
you
hav
e ha
d a
good
rel
atio
nshi
p am
ong
mem
bers
of C
Psof
Fiji
(in
DO
E, L
LC, N
TC) ?
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
good
Very
goo
dD
iffic
ult t
oju
dge
0.5.
4. If
you
wan
t to
furt
her
impr
ove
the
rela
tions
hip
amon
g th
em, w
hat d
o yo
uth
ink
need
s to
be
done
?
0.5.
5. R
elat
ed A
genc
ies
(suc
h as
Min
istr
y of
Edu
catio
n, M
inis
try
of H
ealth
etc
. )D
o yo
u th
ink
that
you
nee
d to
impr
ove
the
rela
tions
hip
with
thos
e of
rela
ted
agen
cies
(suc
h as
MO
E, M
OH
etc
.) ?
If so
, wha
t do
you
thin
k ne
eds
to b
e do
ne?
Nee
ds a
gre
atde
al o
fim
prov
emen
t
Nee
ds a
litt
leim
prov
emen
t
Curr
ent
rela
tions
hip
isO
K
Alre
ady
mai
ntai
ned
ave
ry g
ood
rela
tions
hip
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
Sugg
estio
n fo
r im
prov
emen
t:
0.5.
6. R
ecyc
le C
ompa
nies
Do
you
thin
k th
at y
ou n
eed
to im
prov
e th
e re
latio
nshi
p w
ith re
cycl
e co
mpa
nies
?If
so, w
hat d
o yo
u th
ink
need
s to
be
done
?
Nee
ds a
gre
atde
al o
fim
prov
emen
t
Nee
ds a
litt
leim
prov
emen
t
Curr
ent
rela
tions
hip
isO
K
Alre
ady
mai
ntai
ned
ave
ry g
ood
rela
tions
hip
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
Sugg
estio
n fo
r im
prov
emen
t:
0.5.
7. L
ocal
Con
sulta
nts
Do
you
thin
k th
at y
ou n
eed
to im
prov
e th
e re
latio
nshi
p w
ith lo
cal c
onsu
ltant
s?
Ifso
, wha
t do
you
thin
k ne
eds
to b
e do
ne?
Nee
ds a
gre
atde
al o
fim
prov
emen
t
Nee
ds a
litt
leim
prov
emen
t
Curr
ent
rela
tions
hip
isO
K
Alre
ady
mai
ntai
ned
ave
ry g
ood
rela
tions
hip
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
Sugg
estio
n fo
r im
prov
emen
t:
0.5.
8.Co
mm
unity
lead
ers
Do
you
thin
k th
at y
ou n
eed
to im
prov
e th
e re
latio
nshi
p w
ith c
omm
unity
lead
ers
?If
so, w
hat d
o yo
u th
ink
need
s to
be
done
?
Nee
ds a
gre
atde
al o
fim
prov
emen
t
Nee
ds a
litt
leim
prov
emen
t
Curr
ent
rela
tions
hip
isO
K
Alre
ady
mai
ntai
ned
ave
ry g
ood
rela
tions
hip
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
Sugg
estio
n fo
r im
prov
emen
t:
0.5.
9.Co
mm
unity
peo
ple
Do
you
thin
k th
at y
ou n
eed
to im
prov
e th
e re
latio
nshi
p w
ith c
omm
unity
peo
ple
?If
so, w
hat d
o yo
u th
ink
need
s to
be
done
?
Nee
ds a
gre
atde
al o
fim
prov
emen
t
Nee
ds a
litt
leim
prov
emen
t
Curr
ent
rela
tions
hip
isO
K
Alre
ady
mai
ntai
ned
ave
ry g
ood
rela
tions
hip
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
Sugg
estio
n fo
r im
prov
emen
t:
0.5.
10. N
GO
s (O
ISCA
etc
. )D
o yo
u th
ink
that
you
nee
d to
impr
ove
the
rela
tions
hip
with
NG
Os
?If
so, w
hat d
o yo
u th
ink
need
s to
be
done
?
Nee
ds a
gre
atde
al o
fim
prov
emen
t
Nee
ds a
litt
leim
prov
emen
t
Curr
ent
rela
tions
hip
isO
K
Alre
ady
mai
ntai
ned
ave
ry g
ood
rela
tions
hip
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
Sugg
estio
n fo
r im
prov
emen
t:
0.5.
11.JO
CVs
Do
you
thin
k th
at y
ou n
eed
to im
prov
e th
e re
latio
nshi
p w
ith JO
CVs
(at L
CC a
ndN
TC)?
If so
, wha
t do
you
thin
k ne
eds
to b
e do
ne?
Nee
ds a
gre
atde
al o
fim
prov
emen
t
Nee
ds a
litt
leim
prov
emen
t
Curr
ent
rela
tions
hip
isO
K
Alre
ady
mai
ntai
ned
ave
ry g
ood
rela
tions
hip
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
Sugg
estio
n fo
r im
prov
emen
t:
0.5.
12. O
ther
rel
ated
sta
keho
lder
s (fa
rmer
s, s
choo
ls, e
tc.)
Do
you
thin
k th
at y
ou n
eed
to im
prov
e th
e re
latio
nshi
p w
ith o
ther
sta
keho
lder
s ?
Ifso
, wha
t do
you
thin
k ne
eds
to b
e do
ne?
Nee
ds a
gre
atde
al o
fim
prov
emen
t
Nee
ds a
litt
leim
prov
emen
t
Curr
ent
rela
tions
hip
isO
K
Alre
ady
mai
ntai
ned
ave
ry g
ood
rela
tions
hip
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
Sugg
estio
n fo
r im
prov
emen
t:
0.6.
1. D
o yo
u th
ink
that
DO
E ha
s ta
ken
an in
itiat
ive
to p
roce
ed th
e pr
ojec
t act
iviti
es?
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
hD
iffic
ult t
oju
dge
0.6.
1. D
o yo
u th
ink
that
LCC
/ N
TC h
as ta
ken
an in
itiat
ive
to p
roce
ed th
e pr
ojec
tac
tiviti
es?
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
hD
iffic
ult t
oju
dge
0.6.
3. H
ave
you
foun
d it
diff
icul
t to
carr
y ou
t the
spe
cific
pro
ject
act
ivity
? If
so,
plea
se e
xpla
in th
e ac
tivity
and
the
reas
on w
hy?
(ex.
tim
e co
nstr
aint
, hea
vy w
orkl
oad,
etc.
)Ve
ry d
iffic
ult
Som
ewha
tdi
ffic
ult
Man
agea
ble
Not
at a
lldi
ffic
ult
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
REAS
ON
(S)
0.7.
Oth
ers
0.7.
1. If
you
hav
e ob
serv
ed a
ny o
ther
issu
es /
pro
blem
s in
the
proc
ess
of p
roje
ctim
plem
enta
tion,
ple
ase
desc
ribe.
0.6
Ow
ners
hip
ofFi
ji Si
de
0.5
Com
mun
icat
ions
amon
gst
akeh
olde
rs
-144-
QUE
STIO
NS
SUB-
QUE
STIO
NS
12
34
0RE
ASO
N(S
) / C
omm
ents
1.0.
1.H
ow d
o yo
u de
scrib
e th
e Ja
pane
se te
chni
cal a
dvan
tage
s in
the
area
of m
inim
izat
ion
/re
cycl
ing
of s
olid
was
te?
1. 0
. 2. D
o yo
u th
ink
that
tech
nica
l lev
el in
trod
uced
by
the
JICA
expe
rts
is a
ppro
pria
te fo
r th
ecu
rren
t Fiji
situ
atio
n?N
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
o ju
dge
QUE
STIO
NS
SUB-
QUE
STIO
NS
12
34
0RE
ASO
N(S
)/ C
OM
MEN
TS
2.1.
1 D
o yo
u th
ink
that
the
Proj
ect P
urpo
se.
Capa
city
of 3
R (R
educ
e, R
euse
, Rec
ycle
/Ret
urn)
of
Dep
artm
ent o
f Env
ironm
ent (
DO
E), L
auto
ka C
ity a
nd N
adi T
own
is in
crea
sed
thro
ugh
deve
lopi
ng3R
mod
el fo
r Fi
ji.w
ill b
e ac
hiev
ed b
y th
e en
d of
the
Proj
ect (
Mar
ch, 2
012)
?
For y
our r
efer
ence
, ind
icat
ors
to m
easu
re th
e ac
hiev
emen
t lev
el a
re :
1. T
otal
recy
cle
rate
to
the
Mun
icip
al S
olid
Was
te (M
SW) g
ener
atio
n am
ount
in L
auto
ka C
ity a
nd N
adi
Tow
n w
ill b
e 19
.7%
and
20.4
% re
spec
tivel
y by
the
end
of th
e Pr
ojec
t.2.
Dis
posa
l rat
e to
the
MSW
gen
erat
ion
amou
nt in
Lau
toka
City
and
Nad
i Tow
n w
ill d
ecre
ase
by 4
.4%
and
17.1
% re
spec
tivel
y fr
om 2
008’
s b
y th
e en
d of
the
Proj
ect.
3. D
OE
hold
s se
min
ars
to e
xpla
in th
e gu
idel
ines
and
man
uals
targ
etin
g m
ore
than
hal
f of t
hem
unic
ipal
ities
in F
iji w
hich
pro
vide
was
te c
olle
ctio
n se
rvic
es.
Very
diff
icul
tto
ach
ieve
som
ewha
tdi
ffic
ult t
oac
hiev
e
Mor
e or
less
will
be
achi
eved
Will
be
achi
eved
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
2.1.
2 W
hat k
ind
of c
hang
e ha
ve y
ou o
bser
ved
in D
OE
/ LC
C/ N
TC a
s an
org
aniz
atio
n si
nce
this
Proj
ect s
tart
ed?
(ex.
Wor
king
pro
cess
, dec
isio
n m
akin
g pr
oces
s, te
am e
ffor
ts, e
tc.)
2.1.
3 W
hat k
ind
of c
hang
e ha
ve y
ou e
xper
ienc
ed in
you
rsel
f sin
ce th
is P
roje
ct s
tart
ed?
2.2.
1.1
Are
you
satis
fied
with
the
curr
ent l
evel
of a
chie
vem
ent o
f Out
put 1
?N
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
satis
fied
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
2.2.
1.2
If yo
u an
swer
ed, "
mor
e or
less
" or
"ver
y m
uch"
, wha
t do
you
thin
k ha
s br
ough
t suc
hgo
od r
esul
ts?
If y
ou a
nsw
ered
, "ra
rely
" or
"not
at a
ll", w
hat a
re th
e ch
alle
nges
for
furt
her
impr
ovem
ent?
Chal
leng
es a
head
:
2.2.
2.1
Are
you
satis
fied
with
the
curr
ent l
evel
of a
chie
vem
ent o
f Out
put 2
?N
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
satis
fied
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
2.2.
2.2
If yo
u an
swer
ed, "
mor
e or
less
" or
"ver
y m
uch"
, wha
t do
you
thin
k ha
s br
ough
t suc
hgo
od r
esul
ts?
If y
ou a
nsw
ered
, "ra
rely
" or
"not
at a
ll", w
hat a
re th
e ch
alle
nges
for
furt
her
impr
ovem
ent?
Chal
leng
es a
head
:
2.2.
3.1
Are
you
satis
fied
with
the
curr
ent l
evel
of a
chie
vem
ent o
f Out
put 3
?N
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
satis
fied
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
2.2.
3.2
If yo
u an
swer
ed, "
mor
e or
less
" or
"ver
y m
uch"
, wha
t do
you
thin
k ha
s br
ough
t suc
hgo
od r
esul
ts?
If yo
u an
swer
ed, "
rare
ly" o
r "n
ot a
t all"
, wha
t are
the
chal
leng
es fo
r fu
rthe
rim
prov
emen
t?
Chal
leng
es a
head
:
2.2.
4.1
Are
you
satis
fied
with
the
curr
ent l
evel
of a
chie
vem
ent o
f Out
put 4
?N
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
satis
fied
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
2.2.
4.2
If yo
u an
swer
ed, "
mor
e or
less
" or
"ver
y m
uch"
, wha
t do
you
thin
k ha
s br
ough
t suc
hgo
od r
esul
ts?
If y
ou a
nsw
ered
, "ra
rely
" or
"not
at a
ll", w
hat a
re th
e ch
alle
nges
for
furt
her
impr
ovem
ent?
Chal
leng
es a
head
:
2. E
FFEC
TIVE
NES
S
Plea
se s
peci
fy th
e ac
tiviti
es o
f Out
puts
you
are
eng
aged
in:
2.2.
1 F
or th
ose
who
are
in O
utpu
t 1 -
"1. S
olid
Was
te M
anag
emen
t Mas
ter
Plan
s fo
cusi
ng o
n 3R
are
dev
elop
ed r
espe
ctiv
ely
in L
auto
ka C
ity a
nd N
adi T
own
resp
ectiv
ely.
."
Out
put 1
Out
put 2
2.1
Deg
ree
ofac
hiev
emen
t of p
roje
ctpu
rpos
e
Reas
ons
of g
ood
resu
lts:
Out
put 4
Reas
ons
of g
ood
resu
lts:
Reas
ons
of g
ood
resu
lts:
Reas
ons
of g
ood
resu
lts:
1. R
ELEV
ANCE
1.0
Japa
nese
tech
nica
lad
vant
ages
2.2.
12.
2.5
To w
hat e
xten
t has
eac
hO
utpu
t con
trib
uted
toth
e ac
hiev
emen
t of t
hepr
ojec
t pur
pose
?
Out
put 3
2.2.
2 F
or th
ose
who
are
in O
utpu
t 2 -
"2. L
auto
ka C
ity a
nd N
adi T
own
obta
in th
e ca
paci
ty fo
r pr
oper
Sol
id W
aste
Man
agem
ent (
SWM
) thr
ough
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
Pilo
t pro
ject
s."
2.2.
3 F
or th
ose
who
are
in O
utpu
t 3 -
"3. L
auto
ka C
ity a
nd N
adi T
own
obta
in th
e ca
paci
ty fo
r 3R
pro
mot
ion
activ
ities
at w
hole
are
a of
Lau
toka
City
and
Nad
i Tow
n."
2.2.
4 F
or th
ose
who
are
in O
utpu
t 4 -
"4. A
war
enes
s of
res
iden
ts in
Lau
toka
City
and
Nad
i Tow
n is
rai
sed
thro
ugh
impl
emen
tatio
n of
env
ironm
enta
l edu
catio
n ac
tiviti
es o
n 3R
pro
mot
ion.
"
-145-
QUE
STIO
NS
SUB-
QUE
STIO
NS
12
34
0RE
ASO
N(S
) / C
OM
MEN
TSa.
The
num
ber
of e
xper
tsN
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
o ju
dge
b. T
imel
ines
s of
dis
patc
hing
exp
erts
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
c. L
engt
h of
ass
ignm
ent o
f exp
erts
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
d.Fi
elds
of e
xper
ts (t
echn
ical
exp
ertis
e,co
mm
unic
atio
n sk
ills)
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
a. T
he n
umbe
r of
sta
ffN
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
o ju
dge
b. L
engt
h of
ass
ignm
ent o
f exp
erts
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
c. te
chni
cal e
xper
tise,
com
mun
icat
ion
skill
sN
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
o ju
dge
a. T
he n
umbe
r of
trai
nees
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
b. T
imel
ines
sN
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
o ju
dge
c.Fi
elds
of t
rain
ing
(Cou
rse
cont
ent)
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
a. Q
uant
ityN
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
o ju
dge
b. Q
ualit
yN
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
o ju
dge
c. T
imel
ines
s of
pro
visi
onN
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
o ju
dge
d. T
ype
/ ki
nds
of e
quip
men
tN
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
o ju
dge
e. C
osts
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
a. T
imel
ines
sN
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
o ju
dge
b. A
mou
nt o
f sup
port
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
a. T
he n
umbe
r of
CPs
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
b. T
imel
ines
s of
allo
catio
nN
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
o ju
dge
c. P
rofe
ssio
nal F
ield
s of
CPs
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
a. F
acili
ties
(Exp
erts
Roo
m)
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
b. E
quip
men
t and
Sup
plie
sN
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
o ju
dge
a. A
mou
ntN
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
o ju
dge
b. T
imel
ines
s of
dis
burs
emen
tN
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
o ju
dge
a. F
requ
ency
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
b. T
imel
ines
sN
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
o ju
dge
c. N
umbe
r of
par
ticip
ants
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
d. E
ffec
tiven
ess
of m
anag
emen
tN
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
o ju
dge
a. F
requ
ency
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
b. T
imel
ines
sN
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
o ju
dge
c. N
umbe
r of
par
ticip
ants
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
d. E
ffec
tiven
ess
of m
anag
emen
tN
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
o ju
dge
3.3.
3 If
you
have
any
sugg
estio
ns /
req
uest
to fu
rthe
rim
prov
e th
e pr
ojec
tm
anag
emen
t, pl
ease
exp
lain
/
3 .3.
Has
the
proj
ect s
uppo
rtsy
stem
(pro
ject
man
agem
ent)
func
tione
d w
ell?
3. E
FFIC
IEN
CY:
3.1
Has
the
Japa
nese
inpu
tbe
en a
ppro
pria
tepr
ovid
ing.
.
3.2
Has
the
Fiji
inpu
t bee
nap
prop
riate
prov
idin
g ..
3.1.
1 JI
CA e
xper
ts in
term
s of
3.1.
3 C
P tr
aini
ngs
(Tra
inin
g in
Japa
n, in
Sam
oa e
tc.)
in te
rms
of
3.1.
2 O
ther
Pro
ject
Sta
ff s
uch
aspr
ojec
t coo
rdin
ator
, loc
al s
taff
in th
e pr
ojec
t in
term
s of
3.1.
4 Eq
uipm
ent i
n te
rms
of
3.3.
2 H
as th
e w
eekl
y m
eetin
gbe
en fu
nctio
ned
wel
l in
term
s of
3.3.
1 H
as th
e Jo
int C
oord
inat
ing
Com
mitt
ee fu
nctio
ned
wel
l in
term
s of
3.1.
5 L
ocal
cos
t sup
port
inte
rms
of
3.2.
1 A
lloca
tion
of C
Ps o
f Fiji
inte
rms
of
3.2.
2 Fa
cilit
ies
/ Eq
uipm
ent i
nte
rms
of
3.2.
3 O
pera
tiona
l Cos
ts in
term
sof
-146-
QUE
STIO
NS
SUB-
QUE
STIO
NS
12
34
0RE
ASO
N(S
) / C
omm
ents
Very
diff
icul
tto
ach
ieve
som
ewha
tdi
ffic
ult t
oac
hiev
e
Mor
e or
less
will
be
achi
eved
Will
be
achi
eved
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
4.2
Posi
tive
Impa
ct4.
3.1
Are
ther
e an
y go
od, p
refe
rabl
e si
tuat
ions
pro
duce
d by
the
proj
ect,
such
as
in te
rms
of p
olic
y an
d st
rate
gy, l
ivin
gco
nditi
on fo
r th
e co
mm
unity
peo
ple,
etc
.?
4.3.
1Ar
e th
ere
any
nega
tive
situ
atio
ns p
rodu
ced
by th
epr
ojec
t, su
ch a
s in
term
s of
pol
icy
and
stra
tegy
, liv
ing
cond
ition
for
the
com
mun
ity p
eopl
e, e
tc?
4.3.
2H
ow h
ave
you
cope
d w
ith s
uch
nega
tive
situ
atio
n
QUE
STIO
NS
SUB-
QUE
STIO
NS
12
34
0RE
ASO
N(S
) / C
OM
MEN
TS5.
1.1
Is th
e G
over
nmen
t of F
iji li
kely
to s
uppo
rt th
epr
omot
ion
of 3
R?N
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
oju
dge
5.1.
2 Is
the
Gov
ernm
ent o
f Fiji
like
ly to
sup
port
DO
E /
LCC
/N
TC to
pro
mot
e 3R
to o
ther
wes
tern
div
isio
n of
Fiji
Isla
nds?
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
5.1.
3 D
o yo
u th
ink
that
DO
E /
LCC/
NTC
can
inde
pend
ently
man
age
to p
rom
ote
3R a
fter
the
Japa
nese
ass
ista
nce
iste
rmin
ated
?N
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
oju
dge
5.2
Fina
ncia
lSu
stai
nabi
lity
5.2.
1 Is
the
Gov
ernm
ent o
f Fiji
like
ly to
con
tinue
sup
port
ing
DO
E /
LCC
/ N
TC to
allo
cate
the
suff
icie
nt o
pera
tiona
lbu
dget
for
3R p
rom
otio
n?N
ot a
t all
Rare
lyM
ore
or le
ssVe
ry m
uch
soD
iffic
ult t
oju
dge
5.3.
1 Is
the
tran
sfer
red
tech
nolo
gy b
y th
e Pr
ojec
t pro
perly
mai
ntai
ned
and
utili
zed?
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e5.
3.2
Are
the
faci
litie
s an
d eq
uipm
ent w
ell m
aint
aine
d by
DO
E /
LCC/
NTC
by
them
selv
es?
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e
5.4
Soci
al F
acto
rs5.
4.1.
Do
you
thin
k th
at th
e co
mm
uniti
es w
ill c
ontin
ue to
supp
ort t
he 3
R pr
omot
ion
activ
ities
by
LCC
/ N
TC?
Not
at a
llRa
rely
Mor
e or
less
Very
muc
h so
Diff
icul
t to
judg
e5.
5.1
Wha
t will
be
the
influ
entia
l fac
tors
to s
usta
in th
epr
ojec
t im
pact
aft
er th
e te
rmin
atio
n of
the
proj
ect?
5.5.
2 W
hat w
ill b
e th
e in
fluen
tial f
acto
rs to
dim
inis
h th
epr
ojec
t im
pact
aft
er th
e te
rmin
atio
n of
the
proj
ect?
4 . IM
PACT
:
5.5
Impo
rtan
t fac
tors
influ
enci
ngsu
stai
nabi
litie
s
Ove
rall
Com
men
ts
5.SU
STAI
NAB
ILIT
Y:
5.3
Tech
nica
lSu
stai
nabi
lity
5.1
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Sust
aina
bilit
y
4.1
Achi
evem
ent o
f Ove
rall
Goa
l4.
1.1.
Do
you
thin
k th
at th
e O
vera
ll G
oal [
3R (R
educ
e, R
euse
, Rec
ycle
/Ret
urn)
ispr
ogre
ssed
in F
iji, m
ainl
y in
Wes
tern
Div
isio
n.] i
s lik
ely
to b
e ac
hiev
ed in
3 -
5 ye
ars
afte
r th
e Pr
ojec
t is
term
inat
ed (2
015
201
8)?
4.3
Neg
ativ
e Im
pact
If yo
u ha
ve a
ny a
dditi
onal
com
men
ts o
n th
e Pr
ojec
t or
com
men
ts o
n M
id-t
erm
Rev
iew
, ple
ase
feel
free
to w
rite
here
.Th
ank
you
so m
uch
for
your
coo
pera
tion.
-147-
10.参考資料リスト