Upload
rome-john-francisco
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/21/2019 1. Canning Principle
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1-canning-principle 1/5
Produced by: Fisheries and AquacultureDepartment
Title: Planning and engineering data. 2. Fish Canning... More details
1. CANNING PRINCIPLES
1.1 Introduction to Canning1.2 Selection of Thermal Processing Conditions1.3 Heat Resistance of Bacterial Spores1.4 Lethality of Heat During Heating and Cooling1.5 Calculating Fo Values
1.1 Introduction to Canning
The purpose of thermal processing during manufacture of canned fishery products is the destruction of bacteria byapplication of moist heat. Only having satisfied the safety requirements of protecting consumer health, and the commercialrequirements of preventing non-pathogenic spoilage, does the canner set about choosing a thermal process schedule thatwill optimise the sensory quality of the finished product.
Of the bacteria contaminating fishery products, some (the pathogenic bacteria) cause food poisoning while others only spoil
the food. Of particular concern to fish canners is the possibility of there being contamination by Clostridium botulinum which,if present, can form heat resistant spores capable of withstanding a mild thermal process. As this micro organism can growat the pH of fish flesh it is important that the processor ensure that all his cans have received a process that is sufficientlysevere to kill spores and vegetative forms of the bacterium. Survival of Clostridium botulinum, after the thermal process, is anextreme health risk as low-acid canned foods (pH > 4.5) support growth of the organism, and under certain conditions willalso favour formation of the neurotoxin responsible for outbreaks of botulism.
Sterilization is a heat treatment given foods capable of supporting the growth of heat resistant spore forming bacteria.Sterilization processes destroy all pathogenic contaminants and all other micro organisms capable of growing under normalstorage conditions; survivors of the process will be extremely heat resistant spores which pose no health risk and only growat elevated temperatures (= 40 ºC). Rather than make canned foods absolutely sterile, canners aim for "commercial sterility"which means that the contents are safe (as all pathogenic microorganisms have been destroyed) and shelf-stable at normalstorage temperatures. Were the thermal process designed to make all cans absolutely sterile, there would be unnecessaryloss of sensory and nutritional quality without there being any increase in the safety of the product.
The higher the temperature of sterilization the greater is the rate of thermal destruction, which is why canners process their
canned fish in steam under pressure rather than in water at atmospheric pressure. The rate of thermal destruction is alsoaffected by the nature of the product (liquids heat faster than solids) and the container size (large cans of fish packed in brinetake longer to reach lethal temperatures, than do small cans containing the same product). The total sterilization effect of athermal process can be expressed as the sum of all the sterilization effects achieved by all the time-temperaturecombinations throughout the entire thermal process. By convention, sterilizing effect is expressed in standard units of minutes at 121.1 ºC, so that. an entire processing cycle is expressed as being equivalent, to holding the product at 121.l ºCfor a given time. The unit of sterilization is the F o unit, where an Fo value of one minute is equivalent to holding the product at121.1 ºC for one minute and then cooling it instantly:
1.2 Selection of Thermal Processing Conditions
The purpose of sterilizing cans of fishery products is to rid the container and the contents of all pathogenic micro-organismsand to prevent. spoilage by non-pathogenic contaminants under normal storage conditions. Selection of processingconditions necessary to fulfill these criteria is based upon experimental studies in which the rate of heat penetration to theslowest heating point (SHP) of the container is measured during simulated retorting cycles. The data from these trials (or
from suitable reference sources) are .used by fish canning technologists to determine the processing temperatures and timesnecessary to render the canned product commercially sterile. Manufacturers of canned fish (and all low-acid canned foods)can specify their thermal processes in terms of target Fo values, where the Fo value is a measure of thermal processingseverity. Having selected an appropriate Fo value (which may be far in excess of that required to reduce to an acceptablylow level, the probability of survival of Clostridium botulinum spores -as may be the case when the process is designed tobring about bone softening) the canner then adopts a time and a temperature for the thermal process which will ensure itsdelivery at the SHP of the container.
1.3 Heat Resistance of Bacterial Spores
The heat resistance of bacterial spores is specified by the time required to kill 90 per cent of the population at constanttemperature; this enables a comparison of heat resistance of spores of many different bacteria. For most spores of importance in canned food spoilage their heat resistance is measured at 121.1 ºC (250 ºF), a common retorting temperature,and is expressed as the D value. A typical plot of the number of survivors against heating time is shown in Figure 1. It can beseen that the time to reduce the population from 1 000 000 to 100 000 is the same as that required to reduce it from 100 to
10. That is, the D value is constant for specific bacterial spores when they are subjected to heat at constant temperature. InTable 1 are summarised the D values of bacterial spores important in canned foods.
Destruction of all spores of Clostridium botulinum is the minimum safety requirement , when thermally processing low-acidcanned foods. Canners aim to reduce the probability of one spore surviving the thermal process to such a low level that, for all practical purposes, the contents of the container pose no health risk due to survival of Clostridium botulinum (spores).Experience has shown that a process equivalent in sterilising effect to twelve decimal reductions of the population of Clostridium botulinum is sufficient to protect consumer safety. Such a process is referred to as a "12 D" process and it isequivalent to holding the contents of the container at 121.1 ºC for 2.8 min (12 D= 12 x 0.23 = 2.8 min). A process as severeas this will satisfy requirements (under conditions of good manufacturing practice); however, it will be insufficient to reduce toa commercially acceptable level, the probability of survival for the extremely heat resistant spores (with D values of 2.0 to 5.0min) of non-pathogenic bacteria. This is why canned fish manufacturers select a thermal process which goes beyond thesafety requirements of destruction of Clostridium botulinum.
8/21/2019 1. Canning Principle
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1-canning-principle 2/5
Figure 1 Survivor curve for bacterial destruction at constant temperature
Although the probability of survival for spores of non-pathogenic heat resistant bacteria may be several thousand times thatfor Clostridium botulinum spores, their presence is of no great concern to canners for two reasons:
1. should they lead to spoilage, there is no associated health risk, and2. they only grow at temperatures above 40 ºC (i.e., they are thermophilic) and their optimum growth temperature is
around 55 ºC, which is above that in most warehouses ) and retail outlets .
Table 1 Decimal reduction times (D-values) of bacteria important in low acid canned foods.
Organism D value(min. at 121.1 ºC)
B. stearothermophilus 4.0 - 5.0
C. thermosaccharlyticum 3.0 - 4.0
D. nigrificans * 2.0 - 3.0
C . botulinum (A & B) 0.1 - 0.23
C. sporogenes (P.A. 3679) 0.1 - 1.5
B. coagulans 0.01 - 0.07
* Formerly C. nigrificans
1.4 Lethality of Heat During Heating and Cooling
Although by convention the sterilising effect of a process is expressed in standard units of minutes at 121.1 ºC (the symbolused is Fo). the product inside a can does not instantaneously reach processing temperature and in some cases of conduction heating, the temperature at the thermal centre of the can never reaches that of the heating medium (which neednot be at 121.1 ºC) .This paradox is resolved by making use of a relationship which shows that the rate of change in thethermal destruction of bacteria (i.e. the rate of change in their D values) is logarithmic around temperatures commonly usedin heat sterilisation. This means that the lethal rate of destruction at any temperature can be related to that at a referencetemperature. This relationship is graphically represented . in Figure 2 which shows a thermal death time curve passingthrough 1 min at 121.1 ºC. This "phantom" curve shows that relative to the lethal rate of unity at 121.1°C the lethal rates at91.1, 101.1, 111.1, 131.1, 141.1 and 151.1 ºC are 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 10, 100 and 1 000, respectively.
The sterilising effect of a thermal process (the process Fo value) can therefore be computed by integrating the combinedlethal effect of exposure at all time/temperature combinations throughout the process. This means that a process thatdelivers an Fo value of 2.8 min (the so called 12D process for Clostridium botulinum) is equivalent in . sterilising effect to
heating the contents of the can to 121.1 ºC instantly, holding it at that temperature for 2.8 min, and then cooling it instantly.Similarly, a process for solid style canned tuna packed in 84 x 46.5 mm cans may have a target F o value of 10 min, whichcan be achieved by processing for 74 min at 116 ºC or 50 min at 121.1 ºC. With each process, however, the sterilising effectis the same as, and equivalent to, holding the can of tuna at 121.1 ºC for 10 min under conditions of instantaneous heatingand cooling.
1.5 Calculating Fo Values
To be sure of commercial sterility the F o value at the SHP, the thermal centre of the container, must be sufficient to kill allClostridium botulinum and reduce survival probabilities for other more heat resistant bacteria to an acceptable level. It isassumed that bacterial spores will randomly contaminate the fish and that therefore they may be located at the SHP.
Although a pessimistic approach, this caters for the ``w orst case`` scenario on which product safety must be based.
The measure Fo value heat penetration studies are conducted for representative packs of the canned fish filled to themaximum fill weight likely to be encountered. These cans are then fitted with thermocouple probes which must be located so
as to measure the temperature at the SHP. (As can-to-can variation in the rate of heat penetration can be significant, it isrecommended that at least twelve replicates are tested before data from the slowest heating of all the test cans are used tocompute the Fo value for the process).The thermocouples are connected to digital or graphical recorders, some of whichindicate the product temperature during the thermal process, while others can be purchased which automatically compute Fo
value. Where automatic computation is not possible, the temperature-time data can be used in a number of ways to calculateFo value.
8/21/2019 1. Canning Principle
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1-canning-principle 3/5
Figure 2 Thermal death time curve passing through 1 min at 121.1 ºC.
1.5.1 The improved general method
A plot of temperature versus time is made on specially constructed lethal rate paper which has on its left-hand vertical axisproduct temperature (on a log scale) while on the other vertical axis is drawn lethal rate (on a linear scale). Thus for eachtemperature can be shown the corresponding lethal rate. Time is plotted along the horizontal axis, using a convenient scale.The area under the graph which represents the product of exposure time at all lethal rates throughout the process, is then
divided by the area equivalent to that of an Fo value of unity. This yields the total sterilising effect, or the Fo value, for theprocess. In Figure 3 is shown a hypothetical heat penetration curve for a semi-solid product processed for 40 min at 120 ºC.
Figure 3 Heat penetration lethal rate curve
The temperature profile shown is that of the slowest heating point. By counting squares or using a planimeter the area under the graph is found to be 71 cm², while the area corresponding to one unit of lethality (F o = 1) is 4 cm². Therefore the totalprocess lethality can be calculated,
8/21/2019 1. Canning Principle
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1-canning-principle 4/5
= 71/4
= 17.5 min
This means the total sterilising effect of the process is equivalent to 17.5 minutes at 121.1 ºC, assuming instantaneousheating and cooling. We have now expressed the severity of sterilisation, as experienced at the slowest heating point of thecan.
In the worked example, the retort was not operating at the reference temperature (121.1 ºC) nor did the product reach retort
temperature. It is important not to confuse the specification for the process (40 min/120 ºC) with F o for the process. Aprocess specification alone indicates little about the total process lethality. It would be possible to have a processspecification of 60 min at 121.1 ºC and Fo values of, say, 6.2 min and 11.5 min for 450-g and 225-g cans respectively, thedifferent process severity in this case reflecting can size. Similar mode of heating (convection/conduction), pack weight andfill temperature can all affect the Fo value even though retorting conditions may be constant.
TO SUMMARIZE
The improved general method takes account of the entire heating and cooling effects including any changes in heatpenetration rates caused by product gelation or liquefaction.
The thermal characteristics of the product need not be known. While this makes F o calculation simple it limits theversatility of the technique .
Theoretically the thermal centre of a conduction heating can is at the geometric centre, while that for a convectionheating product is slightly below this on the vertical axis. It is important to locate thermocouple tips at the thermalcentre for solid packs heating by conduction but less so for convection heating, as the rapid heat transfer caused byconvection currents prevents any significant heating lags.
1.5.2 The trapezoidal integration method.
A mathematical method in which the time-temperature data are used to measure changes I in lethality during heating andcooling. By using standard time intervals the lethal value: is computed in stages and the cumulative L value for the process isfound without the need for graphical representation of the heating and cooling curves.
The Fo value for the process is calculated by summing all the L values and multiplying this value by the standard time intervalbetween readings.
The trapezoidal method also allows simple calculation of the contribution to total process lethality of the heating and coolingportions of the process.
In Table 2 are shown L values and in Table 3 is shown a worked example in which temperature was recorded at 5 minuteintervals for a process of 60 minutes at 121.1 °C.
To calculate Fo for the process: Summing the L values gives 2.925 which when multiplied by 5 (the time interval betweenreadings) gives an Fo value of 14.6 min.
To calculate Fo for the heating phase: The sum of L values at time 25 and 60 min (0 and 0.776) is divided by 2 and this value(0.388) is added to the sum of L values from time 30 to 55 min. This gives 1.730 which when multiplied by 5 yields on F o of 8.6 min for the process lethality at the stage when the steam was turned off.
The Improved General Method which relies on a temperature-time plot. for the entire process is the most accurate of allmethods for calculating Fo value and for this reason is frequently quoted as the "reference method". Like the TrapezoidalMethod there are no assumptions made regarding product heating and cooling characteristics, however the benefits of accuracy have to be balanced against the lack of versatility. Data from one set of trials cannot easily be used to calculate F o
values when product temperature and/or retort temperature are (is) altered. This means that once process conditions are
altered new temperature-time data must be collected under the new experimental conditions.
Table 2 Values of L for temperature ranging from 90 ºC to 130.9 ºC in 0.1 ºC intervals
ºC 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
90 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
91 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
92 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.002
93 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
94 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
95 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003
96 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004
97 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005
98 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006
99 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.008
100 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.010
101 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.012 0.012
102 0.012 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.015 0.015
103 0.015 0.016 0.016 0.017 0.017 0.017 0.018 0.018 0.019 0.019
104 0.019 0.020 0.020 0.021 0.021 0.022 0.022 0.023 0.023 0.024
105 0.025 0.025 0.026 0.026 0.027 0.028 0.028 0.029 0.030 0.030
106 0.031 0.032 0.032 0.033 0.034 0.035 0.035 0.036 0.037 0.038
107 0.039 0.040 0.041 0.042 0.043 0.044 0.045 0.046 0.047 0.048
8/21/2019 1. Canning Principle
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1-canning-principle 5/5
108 0.049 0.050 0.051 0.052 0.054 0.055 0.056 0.058 0.059 0.060
109 0.062 0.063 0.065 0.066 0.068 0.069 0.071 0.072 0.074 0.076
110 0.078 0.079 0.081 0.083 0.085 0.087 0.089 0.091 0.093 0.095
111 0.098 0.100 0.102 0.105 0.107 0.110 0.112 0.115 0.117 0.120
112 0.123 0.126 0.129 0.132 0.135 0.138 0.141 0.145 0.148 0.151
113 0.155 0.158 0.162 0.166 0.170 0.174 0.178 0.182 0.186 0.191
114 0.195 0.200 0.204 0.209 0.214 0.219 0.224 0.229 0.234 0.240
115 0.245 0.251 0.257 0.263 0.269 0.275 0.282 0.288 0.295 0.302
116 0.309 0.316 0.324 0.331 0.339 0.347 0.355 0.363 0.372 0.380
117 0.389 0.398 0.407 0.417 0.427 0.437 0.447 0.457 0.468 0.479
118 0.490 0.501 0.513 0.525 0.537 0.550 0.562 0.575 0.589 0.603
119 0.617 0.631 0.646 0.661 0.676 0.692 0.708 0.724 0.741 0.759
120 0.776 0.794 0.813 0.832 0.851 0.871 0.891 0.912 0.933 0.955
121 0.977 1.000 1.023 1.047 1.072 1.096 1.122 1.148 1.175 1.202
122 1.230 1.259 1.288 1.318 1.349 1.380 1.413 1.445 1.479 1.514
123 1.549 1.585 1.622 1.660 1.698 1.738 1.778 1.820 1.862 1.905
124 1.950 1.995 2.042 2.089 2.138 2.188 2.239 2.291 2.344 2.399
125 2.455 2.512 2.570 2.630 2.692 2.754 2.818 2.884 2.951 3.020
126 3.090 3.162 3.236 3.311 3.388 3.467 3.548 3.631 3.715 3.802
127 3.890 3.981 4.074 4.169 4.266 4.365 4.467 4.571 4.677 4.786
128 4.898 5.012 5.129 5.248 5.370 5.495 5.623 4.754 5.888 6.026
129 6.166 6.310 6.457 6.607 6.761 6.918 7.079 7.244 7.413 7.586
130 7.762 7.943 8.128 8.318 8.511 8.710 8.913 9.120 9.333 9.550
Note:
z = 10 ºCT = product temperature
Table 3 Trapezoidal method for integration of lethal rate data to calculate Fo value
Time(min)
Temperature (ºC) L L/ t Fo(min)
0 24 0
5 24.5 0
10 34 0
15 54 0
20 72.5 0
25 87 0
30 98 0.005
35 105 0.025
40 110.5 0.087
45 114.5 0.219
50 117 0.389
55 119 0.617
60 120 0.776 1.730 8.6
* STEAM OFF
65 120 0.776
70 106 0.031
75 88 0 2.925 14.6