Upload
benjamin-oliver
View
252
Download
9
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
CHAP 4 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF BEAMS AND FRAMES
FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS AND DESIGNNam-Ho Kim
2
INTRODUCTION
• We learned Direct Stiffness Method in Chapter 2– Limited to simple elements such as 1D bars
• In Chapter 3, Galerkin Method and Principle of Minimum Potential Energy can be applied to more complex elements
• we will learn Energy Method to build beam finite element– Structure is in equilibrium when the potential energy is minimum
• Potential energy: Sum of strain energy and potential of applied loads
• Interpolation scheme:
v(x) (x) { } N q
Beam deflection
Interpolationfunction
NodalDOF
Potential of applied loads
Strain energy
U V
3
BEAM THEORY
• Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory– can carry the transverse load– slope can change along the span (x-axis)– Cross-section is symmetric w.r.t. xy-plane– The y-axis passes through the centroid– Loads are applied in xy-plane (plane of loading)
L F
x
y
F
Plane of loading
y
z
Neutral axis
A
4
BEAM THEORY cont.
• Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory cont.– Plane sections normal to the beam axis remain plane and normal to
the axis after deformation (no shear stress)– Transverse deflection (deflection curve) is function of x only: v(x)– Displacement in x-dir is function of x and y: u(x, y)
y
y(dv/dx)
q = dv/dx
v(x) L F
x
y
Neutral axis
0
dvu(x,y) u (x) y
dx
20
xx 2
duu d vy
x dx dx
dv
dxq
5
BEAM THEORY cont.
• Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory cont.– Strain along the beam axis:– Strain xx varies linearly w.r.t. y; Strain yy = 0
– Curvature:– Can assume plane stress in z-dir basically uniaxial
status
• Axial force resultant and bending moment
20
xx 2
duu d vy
x dx dx
0 0du / dx
2 2d v / dx
2
xx xx 0 2
d vE E Ey
dx
2
xx 0 2A A A
22
xx 0 2A A A
d vP dA E dA E ydA
dx
d vM y dA E ydA E y dA
dx
Moment of inertia I(x)
0
2
2
P EA
d vM EI
dx
EA: axial rigidity
EI: flexural rigidity
6
BEAM THEORY cont.
• Beam constitutive relation– We assume P = 0 (We will consider non-zero P in the frame element)– Moment-curvature relation:
• Sign convention
– Positive directions for applied loads
2
2
d vM EI
dx Moment and curvature is linearly dependent
+P +P
+M+M+Vy
+Vy
yx
p(x)
F1 F2 F3
C1 C2 C3
y
x
7
GOVERNING EQUATIONS
• Beam equilibrium equations
– Combining three equations together:– Fourth-order differential equation
yy
dVV dx
dx
dMM dx
dx
yVM
dx
p
yy y y
dVf 0 p(x)dx V dx V 0
dx
ydV
p(x)dx
y
dM dxM M dx pdx V dx 0
dx 2
4
4
d vEI p(x)
dx
y
dMV
dx
8
STRESS AND STRAIN
• Bending stress
– This is only non-zero stress component for Euler-Bernoulli beam
• Transverse shear strain
– Euler beam predicts zero shear strain (approximation)– Traditional beam theory says the transverse shear stress is– However, this shear stress is in general small compared to
the bending stress
2
xx 2
d vEy
dx
2
2
d vM EI
dx
xx
M(x)y(x,y)
I
xy
u v v v0
y x x x
0
dvu(x,y) u (x) y
dx
Bending stress
xy
VQ
Ib
9
POTENTIAL ENERGY
• Potential energy• Strain energy
– Strain energy density
– Strain energy per unit length
– Strain energy
U V
2 22 22 2
0 xx xx xx 2 2
1 1 1 d v 1 d vU E( ) E y Ey
2 2 2 dx 2 dx
2 22 22 2
L 0 2 2A A A
1 d v 1 d vU (x) U (x,y,z)dA Ey dA E y dA
2 dx 2 dx
Moment of inertia
22
L 2
1 d vU (x) EI
2 dx
22L L
L 20 0
1 d vU U (x)dx EI dx
2 dx
10
POTENTIAL ENERGY cont.
• Potential energy of applied loads
• Potential energy
– Potential energy is a function of v(x) and slope– The beam is in equilibrium when has its minimum value
CF NNL
ii i i0
i 1 i 1
dv(x )V p(x)v(x)dx Fv(x ) C
dx
CF2 NN2L L
ii i i20 0
i 1 i 1
dv(x )1 d vU V EI dx p(x)v(x)dx Fv(x ) C
2 dx dx
vv*
0v
11
RAYLEIGH-RITZ METHOD
1. Assume a deflection shape
– Unknown coefficients ci and known function fi(x)
– Deflection curve v(x) must satisfy displacement boundary conditions
2. Obtain potential energy as function of coefficients
3. Apply the principle of minimum potential energy to determine the coefficients
1 1 2 2 n nv(x) c f (x) c f (x)..... c f (x)
1 2 n(c ,c ,...c ) U V
1 2 n
0c c c
12
EXAMPLE – SIMPLY SUPPORTED BEAM
• Assumed deflection curve
• Strain energy
• Potential energy of applied loads (no reaction forces)
• Potential energy
• PMPE:
p0
E,I,L
xv(x) Csin
L
22 2 4L
2 30
1 d v C EIU EI dx
2 dx 4L
L L0
0
0 0
2p LxV p(x)v(x)dx p Csin dx C
L
4
2 03
2p LEIU V C C
4L
44
0 03 5
2p L 4p Ld EIC 0 C
dC 2L EI
13
EXAMPLE – SIMPLY SUPPORTED BEAM cont.
• Exact vs. approximate deflection at the center
• Approximate bending moment and shear force
• Exact solutions
4 40 0
approx exact
p L p LC C
76.5EI 76.8EI
22 20
2 2 3
3 30
y 3 3 2
4p Ld v x xM(x) EI EIC sin sin
dx L L L
4p Ld v x xV (x) EI EIC cos cos
dx L L L
33 40 0 0
20 0
0y 0
p L p L p1v(x) x x x
EI 24 12 24
p L pM(x) x x
2 2p L
V (x) p x2
14
EXAMPLE – SIMPLY SUPPORTED BEAM cont.
• Deflection
• Bendingmoment
• Shear force
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1xv(
x)/v
_max
v-exact
v-approx.
-0.14
-0.12
-0.10
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0.00
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
x
Ben
ding
Mom
ent M
(x)
M_exact
M_approx
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1x
She
ar F
orce
V(x
)
V_exact
V_approx
Erro
r increa
ses
15
EXAMPLE – CANTILEVERED BEAM
• Assumed deflection
• Need to satisfy BC
• Strain energy
• Potential of loads
F
C
–p0
E,I,L2 31 2v(x) a bx c x c x
v(0) 0, dv(0) / dx 0 2 31 2v(x) c x c x
L
2
1 2
0
EIU 2c 6c x dx
2
L
1 2 0
0
3 42 3 20 0
1 2
dvV c ,c p v(x)dx Fv(L) C (L)
dx
p L p Lc FL 2CL c FL 3CL
3 4
16
EXAMPLE – CANTILEVERED BEAM cont.
• Derivatives of U:
• PMPE:
• Solve for c1 and c2:
• Deflection curve:
• Exact solution:
L2
1 2 1 21 0
L2 3
1 2 1 22 0
U2EI 2c 6c x dx EI 4Lc 6L c
c
U6EI 2c 6c x xdx EI 6L c 12L c
c
1
2
0c
0c
32 20
1 2
42 3 3 20
1 2
p LEI 4Lc 6L c FL 2CL
3
p LEI 6L c 12L c FL 3CL
4
3 31 2c 23.75 10 , c 8.417 10
3 2 3v(x) 10 23.75x 8.417x
2 3 41v(x) 5400x 800x 300x
24EI
17
EXAMPLE – CANTILEVERED BEAM cont.
• Deflection
• Bendingmoment
• Shear force
Erro
r increa
ses
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1xv(
x)/v
_max
v-exact
v-approx.
-100.00
0.00
100.00
200.00
300.00
400.00
500.00
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1x
Ben
ding
Mom
ent M
(x) M_exact
M_approx
200.0
300.0
400.0
500.0
600.0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1x
She
ar F
orce
V(x
)
V_exact
V_approx
18
FINITE ELEMENT INTERPOLATION
• Rayleigh-Ritz method approximate solution in the entire beam– Difficult to find approx solution that satisfies displacement BC
• Finite element approximates solution in an element– Make it easy to satisfy displacement BC using interpolation technique
• Beam element– Divide the beam using a set of elements– Elements are connected to other elements at nodes– Concentrated forces and couples can only be applied at nodes– Consider two-node bean element– Positive directions for forces and couples– Constant or linearly
distributed loadF1
F2
C2C1
p(x)
x
19
FINITE ELEMENT INTERPOLATION cont.
• Nodal DOF of beam element– Each node has deflection v and slope q– Positive directions of DOFs– Vector of nodal DOFs
• Scaling parameter s– Length L of the beam is scaled to 1 using scaling parameter s
• Will write deflection curve v(s) in terms of s
v1v2
q2q1
Lx1
s = 0
x2
s = 1
x
T1 1 2 2{ } {v v } q qq
1x x 1s , ds dx,
L Lds 1
dx Lds,dx L
20
FINITE ELEMENT INTERPOLATION cont.
• Deflection interpolation– Interpolate the deflection v(s) in terms of four nodal DOFs– Use cubic function:– Relation to the slope:
– Apply four conditions:
– Express four coefficients in terms of nodal DOFs
2 30 1 2 3v(s) a a s a s a s
21 2 3
dv dv ds 1(a 2a s 3a s )
dx ds dx Lq
1 1 2 2
dv(0) dv(1)v(0) v v(1) v
dx dx q q
1 0
1 1
2 0 1 2 3
2 1 2 3
v v(0) a
dv 1(0) a
dx Lv v(1) a a a a
dv 1(1) (a 2a 3a )
dx L
q
q
0 1
1 1
2 1 1 2 2
3 1 1 2 2
a v
a L
a 3v 2L 3v L
a 2v L 2v L
q q q q q
21
FINITE ELEMENT INTERPOLATION cont.
• Deflection interpolation cont.
• Shape functions
– Hermite polynomials– Interpolation property
2 3 2 3 2 3 2 31 1 2 2v(s) (1 3s 2s )v L(s 2s s ) (3s 2s )v L( s s ) q q
2 31
2 32
2 33
2 34
N (s) 1 3s 2s
N (s) L(s 2s s )
N (s) 3s 2s
N (s) L( s s )
1
11 2 3 4
2
2
v
v(s) [N (s) N (s) N (s) N (s)]v
q q
v(s) { } N q
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
N1 N3
N2/L
N4/L
22
FINITE ELEMENT INTERPOLATION cont.
• Properties of interpolation– Deflection is a cubic polynomial (discuss accuracy and limitation)– Interpolation is valid within an element, not outside of the element– Adjacent elements have continuous deflection and slope
• Approximation of curvature– Curvature is second derivative and related to strain and stress
– B is linear function of s and, thus, the strain and stress– Alternative expression:
– If the given problem is linearly varying curvature, the approximation is accurate; if higher-order variation of curvature, then it is approximate
1
2 21
2 2 2 22
2
v
d v 1 d v 1[ 6 12s, L( 4 6s), 6 12s, L( 2 6s)]
vdx L ds L
q q 2
2 24 11 4
d v 1{ }
dx L
B q B: strain-displacement vector
2T T
2 24 11 4
d v 1{ }
dx L
Bq
23
FINITE ELEMENT INTERPOLATION cont.
• Approximation of bending moment and shear force
– Stress is proportional to M(s); M(s) is linear; stress is linear, too– Maximum stress always occurs at the node– Bending moment and shear force are not continuous between
adjacent elements
2
2 2
d v EIM(s) EI { }
dx L B q
3
y 3 3
dM d v EIV EI [ 12 6L 12 6L]{ }
dx dx L q
Linear
Constant
24
EXAMPLE – INTERPOLATION
• Cantilevered beam• Given nodal DOFs
• Deflection and slope at x = 0.5L• Parameter s = 0.5 at x = 0.5L• Shape functions:• Deflection at s = 0.5:
• Slope at s = 0.5:
T{ } {0, 0, 0.1, 0.2} qL
v1
v2
q 2q 1
1 1 1 11 2 3 42 2 2 2
1 L 1 LN ( ) , N ( ) , N ( ) , N ( )
2 8 2 8
1 1 1 1 11 1 2 1 3 2 4 22 2 2 2 2
2 22 2
v( ) N ( )v N ( ) N ( )v N ( )
v L1 L 1 L0 0 v 0.025
2 8 2 8 2 8
q q
q q
31 2 41 1 2 2
2 2 2 21 1 2 2
dNdN dN dNdv 1 dv 1v v
dx L ds L ds ds ds ds
1 1v ( 6s 6s ) 1 4s 3s v (6s 6s ) 2s 3s 0.1
L L
q q
q q
25
EXAMPLE
• A beam finite element with length L
• Calculate v(s)
• Bending moment
3 2
1 1 2 2
L Lv 0, 0, v ,
3EI 2EI q q
1 1 2 1 3 2 4 2v(s) N (s)v N (s) N (s)v N (s) q q
2 3 2 32 2v(s) (3s 2s )v L( s s ) q
2 2
2 22 2 2 2
3 2
2
d v EI d v EIM(s) EI (6 12s)v L( 2 6s)
dx L ds L
EI L L(6 12s) L( 2 6s)
L 3EI 2EI
L(1 s) (L x)
q
L F
Bending moment cause by unit force at the tip
26
FINITE ELEMENT EQUATION FOR BEAM
• Finite element equation using PMPE– A beam is divided by NEL elements with constant sections
• Strain energy– Sum of each element’s strain energy
– Strain energy of element (e)
p(x)
F1 F2 F3
C1 C2C3
y
x
F4 F5
C4 C5
1 2 3 45
( )11x
( ) ( )1 22 1x x= ( ) ( )2 3
2 1x x= ( ) ( )3 42 1x x= ( )4
2x
eT 2
e1
NEL NELL x eL L0 x
e 1 e 1
U U (x)dx U (x)dx U
e2
e1
2 22 2x 1e
2 3 2x 0
1 d v EI 1 d vU EI dx ds
2 dx L 2 ds
27
FE EQUATION FOR BEAM cont.
• Strain energy cont.– Approximate curvature in terms of nodal DOFs
– Approximate element strain energy in terms of nodal DOFs
• Stiffness matrix of a beam element
22 2 2 T Te e
2 2 21 4 4 14 1 1 4
d v d v d v{ } { }
ds ds ds
q B B q
e
1 Te e e e e(e) T T3 0
1 EI 1U { } ds { } { } [ ]{ }
2 L 2 q B B q q k q
1e
3 0
6 12s
L( 4 6s)EI[ ] 6 12s L( 4 6s) 6 12s L( 2 6s) ds
L 6 12s
L( 2 6s)
k
28
FE EQUATION FOR BEAM cont.
• Stiffness matrix of a beam element
• Strain energy cont.
– Assembly
2 2
e
3
2 2
12 6L 12 6L
6L 4L 6L 2LEI[ ]
L 12 6L 12 6L
6L 2L 6L 4L
k
Symmetric, positive semi-definite
Proportional to EI
Inversely proportional to L
NEL NEL
e e e(e) T
e 1 e 1
1U U { } [ ]{ }
2
q k q
Ts s s
1U { } [ ]{ }
2 Q K Q
29
EXAMPLE – ASSEMBLY
• Two elements• Global DOFs
F3F2
y
x
1 2 3
2EI EI
2L LT
s 1 1 2 2 3 3{ } {v v v } q q qQ
1 1 2 2
12 2
1 13
22 2
2
v v
3 3L 3 3L v
3L 4L 3L 2LEI[ ]
L 3 3L 3 3L v
3L 2L 3L 4L
q q
q q
k
2 2 3 3
22 2
2 23
32 2
3
v v
12 6L 12 6L v
6L 4L 6L 2LEI[ ]
L 12 6L 12 6L v
6L 2L 6L 4L
q q
q q
k
2 2
s 3 2 2 2
2 2
3 3L 3 3L 0 0
3L 4L 3L 2L 0 0
3 3L 15 3L 12 6LEI[ ]
L 3L 2L 3L 8L 6L 2L
0 0 12 6L 12 6L
0 0 6L 2L 6L 4L
K
30
FE EQUATION FOR BEAM cont.
• Potential energy of applied loads– Concentrated forces and couples
– Distributed load (Work-equivalent nodal forces)
ND
i i i ii 1
V Fv C
q
1
1T
1 1 2 ND s s2
ND
F
C
V v v ...... { } { }F
C
q q
Q F
e2
e1
NEL NELx (e)
xe 1 e 1
V p(x)v(x)dx V
e2
e1
1x(e) (e)
x0
V p(x)v(x)dx L p(s)v(s)ds
1
(e) (e)1 1 1 2 2 3 2 4
0
1 1 1 1(e) (e) (e) (e)
1 1 1 2 2 3 2 4
0 0 0 0
(e) (e) (e) (e)1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
V L p(s) v N N v N N ds
v L p(s)N ds L p(s)N ds v L p(s)N ds L p(s)N ds
v F C v F C
q q
q q
q q
31
EXAMPLE – WORK-EQUIVALENT NODAL FORCES
• Uniformly distributed load
pL/2 pL/2
pL2/12 pL2/12
p
Equivalent
1 1 2 31 10 0
pLF pL N (s)ds pL (1 3s 2s )ds
2
21 12 2 31 20 0
pLC pL N (s)ds pL (s 2s s )ds
12
1 1 2 32 30 0
pLF pL N (s)ds pL (3s 2s )ds
2
21 12 2 3
2 40 0
pLC pL N (s)ds pL ( s s )ds
12
2 2T pL pL pL pL
{ }2 12 2 12
F
32
FE EQUATION FOR BEAM cont.
• Finite element equation for beam
– One beam element has four variables
– When there is no distributed load, p = 0
– Applying boundary conditions is identical to truss element
– At each DOF, either displacement (v or q ) or force (F or C) must be
known, not both
– Use standard procedure for assembly, BC, and solution
1 12 2 2
1 13
2 22 2 2
2 2
v F12 6L 12 6L pL / 2
C6L 4L 6L 2L pL / 12EIv FL 12 6L 12 6L pL / 2
C6L 2L 6L 4L pL / 12
q q
33
PRINCIPLE OF MINIMUM POTENTIAL ENERGY
• Potential energy (quadratic form)
• PMPE– Potential energy has its minimum when
• Applying BC– The same procedure with truss elements (striking-the-rows and
striking-he-columns)
• Solve for unknown nodal DOFs {Q}
T Ts s s s s
1U V { } [ ]{ } { } { }
2 Q K Q Q F
s s s[ ]{ } { }K Q F
[ ]{ } { }K Q F
[Ks] is symmetric & PSD
[K] is symmetric & PD
34
BENDING MOMENT & SHEAR FORCE
• Bending moment
– Linearly varying along the beam span
• Shear force
– Constant– When true moment is not linear and true shear is not constant, many
elements should be used to approximate it
• Bending stress• Shear stress for rectangular section
2 2
2 2 2 2
d v EI d v EIM(s) EI { }
dx L ds L B q
1
3 31
y 3 3 3 32
2
v
dM d v EI d v EIV (s) EI [ 12 6L 12 6L]
vdx dx L ds L
q q
x
My
I
2y
xy 2
1.5V 4y(y) 1
bh h
35
EXAMPLE – CLAMPED-CLAMPED BEAM
• Determine deflection & slope at x = 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 m
• Element stiffness matricesF2 = 240 N
y
x
1 2
1 m
3
1 m
1 1 2 2
1
1(1)
2
2
v v
v12 6 12 6
6 4 6 2[ ] 1000
v12 6 12 6
6 2 6 4
q q
q q
k
2 2 3 3
2
2(2)
3
3
v v
v12 6 12 6
6 4 6 2[ ] 1000
v12 6 12 6
6 2 6 4
q q
q q
k
11
11
2
2
33
33
F12 6 12 6 0 0 v
C6 4 6 2 0 0
24012 6 24 0 12 6 v1000
06 2 0 8 6 2
F0 0 12 6 12 6 v
C0 0 6 2 6 4
q q q
36
EXAMPLE – CLAMPED-CLAMPED BEAM cont.
• Applying BC
• At x = 0.5 s = 0.5 and use element 1
• At x = 1.0 either s = 1 (element 1) or s = 0 (element 2)
2
2
v24 0 2401000
0 8 0
q
2
2
v 0.01
0.0
q
12
1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 2 2 3 2 4 32 2 2 2 2 2
3122 (1)
s
v( ) v N ( ) N ( ) v N ( ) N ( ) 0.01 N ( ) 0.005m
dN1( ) v 0.015rad
L ds
q q
q
2 3 3
32(1)
s 1
v(1) v N (1) 0.01 N (1) 0.01m
dN1(1) v 0.0rad
L ds
q
2 1 1
12(2)
s 0
v(0) v N (0) 0.01 N (0) 0.01m
dN1(0) v 0.0rad
L ds
q
Will this solution be accurate or approximate?
37
EXAMPLE – CANTILEVERED BEAM
• One beam element• No assembly required• Element stiffness
• Work-equivalent nodal forces
C = –50 N-m
p0 = 120 N/m
EI = 1000 N-m2
1
1s
2
2
v12 6 12 6
6 4 6 2[ ] 1000
v12 6 12 6
6 2 6 4
q q
K
2 31e
2 311e
0 02 302e
2 32e
F 1/ 2 601 3s 2s
C L / 12 10(s 2s s )Lp L ds p L
F 1/ 2 603s 2s
C L / 12 10( s s )L
L = 1m
38
EXAMPLE – CANTILEVERED BEAM cont.
• FE matrix equation
• Applying BC
• Deflection curve:• Exact solution:
1 1
1 1
2
2
v12 6 12 6 F 60
6 4 6 2 C 101000
v12 6 12 6 60
6 2 6 4 10 50
q q
2
2
v12 6 601000
6 4 60
q
2
2
v 0.01
0.03
q
m
rad
33 4v(s) 0.01N (s) 0.03N (s) 0.01s
4 3 2v(x) 0.005(x 4x x )
39
EXAMPLE – CANTILEVERED BEAM cont.
• Support reaction (From assembled matrix equation)
• Bending moment
• Shear force
2 2 1
2 2 1
1000 12v 6 F 60
1000 6v 2 C 10
q
q 1
1
F 120N
C 10N m
2
1 1 2 22
EIM(s) { }
LEI
( 6 12s)v L( 4 6s) (6 12s)v L( 2 6s)L1000[ 0.01(6 12s) 0.03( 2 6s)]
60s N m
q q
B q
y 1 1 2 23
EIV 12v 6L 12v 6L
L1000[ 12 ( 0.01) 6( 0.03)]
60N
q q
40
EXAMPLE – CANTILEVERED BEAM cont.
• Comparisons
-0.010
-0.008
-0.006
-0.004
-0.002
0.000
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1x
v
FEM
Exact
-0.030
-0.025
-0.020
-0.015
-0.010
-0.005
0.000
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1x
q
FEM
Exact
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1x
M
FEM
Exact
-120
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1x
Vy
FEM
Exact
Deflection Slope
Bending moment Shear force
41
PLANE FRAME ELEMENT
• Beam– Vertical deflection and slope. No axial deformation
• Frame structure– Can carry axial force, transverse shear force, and bending moment
(Beam + Truss)
• Assumption– Axial and bending effects
are uncoupled– Reasonable when deformation
is small
• 3 DOFs per node
• Need coordinate transfor-mation like plane truss
F
p
1
2 3
4
1u2u
1v 2v
1q
2q
1u
2u
1v
2v
1q
2q
1u
2u
1v
2v
1q
2q 1
2 3
i i i{u , v , }q
42
PLANE FRAME ELEMENT cont.
• Element-fixed local coordinates• Local DOFs Local forces• Transformation between local and global coord.
1
2f
x
y
Local coordinates
Global coordinates
xy
1u
2u
1v
2v
1q
2q
x y{u,v, }q x y{f , f , c}
x1 x1
y1 y1
1 1
x2 x2
y2 y2
2 2
f fcos sin 0 0 0 0f fsin cos 0 0 0 0
c c0 0 1 0 0 0
f f0 0 0 cos sin 0
f f0 0 0 sin cos 0
0 0 0 0 0 1c c
f f f f f f f f
{ } [ ]{ }f T f
{ } [ ]{ }q T q
43
PLANE FRAME ELEMENT cont.
• Axial deformation (in local coord.)
• Beam bending
• Basically, it is equivalent to overlapping a beam with a bar• A frame element has 6 DOFs
1 x1
2 x2
u f1 1EAu fL 1 1
y112 2
1 13
2 y22 2
2 2
fv12 6L 12 6L
6L 4L 6L 2L cEIvL 12 6L 12 6L f
6L 2L 6L 4L c
q q
44
PLANE FRAME ELEMENT cont.
• Element matrix equation (local coord.)
• Element matrix equation (global coord.)
• Same procedure for assembly and applying BC
x11 1 1
y12 2 2 2 12 2
2 2 2 2 1 1
1 1 2 x2
2 2 2 2 2 y22 2
2 2 2 2 2 2
fa 0 0 a 0 0 uf0 12a 6La 0 12a 6La v
0 6La 4L a 0 6La 2L a c
a 0 0 a 0 0 u f
0 12a 6La 0 12a 6La v f
0 6La 2L a 0 6La 4L a c
q
q
1
2 3
EAa
LEI
aL
[ ]{ } { }k q f
[ ][ ]{ } [ ]{ }k T q T f T[ ] [ ][ ]{ } { }T k T q f [ ]{ } { }k q f
T[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]k T k T
45
PLANE FRAME ELEMENT cont.
• Calculation of element forces– Element forces can only be calculated in the local coordinate– Extract element DOFs {q} from the global DOFs {Qs}
– Transform the element DOFs to the local coordinate– Then, use 1D bar and beam formulas for element forces
– Axial force
– Bending moment
– Shear force
• Other method:
{ } [ ]{ }q T q
2 1
AEP u u
L
2
EIM(s) { }
L B q
y 3
EIV (s) [ 12 6L 12 6L]
L q
y1 1
2 21 1
3y2 2
2 222
V v12 6L 12 6L
M 6L 4L 6L 2LEIV vL 12 6L 12 6L
6L 2L 6L 4LM
q q