Upload
gerald-mitchell
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Microsoft CFO Summit:
Looking for Trouble in all the Right Places©
Professor Thomas Z. LysKellogg School of
ManagementNorthwestern University
2
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
TopicsTopics Tax v Financial ReportingTax v Financial Reporting Conformity between financial reporting and Conformity between financial reporting and
tax filingtax filing
Reporting v Disclosure - understand what is Reporting v Disclosure - understand what is being recognized versus what is being being recognized versus what is being disclosed disclosed
Inter-temporal effects: Relation between Inter-temporal effects: Relation between asset and liabilities valuations in one period asset and liabilities valuations in one period and performance metrics in subsequent and performance metrics in subsequent periodsperiods
3
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
The basic accounting modelThe basic accounting model• Difference between the stock view of the balance Difference between the stock view of the balance
sheet and the flow perspectives in the income and sheet and the flow perspectives in the income and cash flow statementscash flow statements
• Linkages between the income and cash flow Linkages between the income and cash flow statements and successive balance sheet statements and successive balance sheet statementsstatements
Looking for problemsLooking for problems• Revenue recognitionRevenue recognition• Asset valuationAsset valuation• Liability valuationLiability valuation
4
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Tax v Financial ReportingTax v Financial Reporting There are only very few conformity There are only very few conformity
requirements between US GAAP and US tax requirements between US GAAP and US tax reporting!reporting!
As a result, companies can pursue different As a result, companies can pursue different goals for financial reporting (communication) goals for financial reporting (communication) and tax:and tax:• Often, companies try to present themselves as Often, companies try to present themselves as
favorably as possible in their financial disclosuresfavorably as possible in their financial disclosures• To minimize taxes, companies often present To minimize taxes, companies often present
themselves in the worst possible light for tax themselves in the worst possible light for tax purposes.purposes.
5
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
These differences in goals between financial These differences in goals between financial reporting and tax result in (potentially) large reporting and tax result in (potentially) large differences between the numbers reported to differences between the numbers reported to the IRS and the numbers reported to the IRS and the numbers reported to shareholdersshareholders
The differences can be eitherThe differences can be either• Timing differences (e.g., depreciation, leases, etc.) Timing differences (e.g., depreciation, leases, etc.)
which give rise to deferred taxes, orwhich give rise to deferred taxes, or• Permanent differences (amortization of non-tax Permanent differences (amortization of non-tax
goodwill) which does not give rise to deferred goodwill) which does not give rise to deferred taxestaxes
6
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Book–Tax Conformity: The Book–Tax Conformity: The Current DebateCurrent Debate Many countries have full book–tax conformityMany countries have full book–tax conformity There are voices in the US to require conformity There are voices in the US to require conformity
between book and tax, particularly in light of the between book and tax, particularly in light of the recent financial disclosure failuresrecent financial disclosure failures
Such conformity would limit companies’ Such conformity would limit companies’ communication optionscommunication options• Limiting degrees of freedom is good if you are trying to Limiting degrees of freedom is good if you are trying to
stop cheaters, but stop cheaters, but • it also constrains the communication options available it also constrains the communication options available
to honest firmsto honest firms
Imposing conformity will criminalize financial Imposing conformity will criminalize financial reporting errorsreporting errors
7
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Recognition v DisclosureRecognition v Disclosure Recognition refers to reporting the $ Recognition refers to reporting the $
amounts of a transaction in the financial amounts of a transaction in the financial statement (e.g. balance sheet).statement (e.g. balance sheet).
Disclosure refers to reporting transactions Disclosure refers to reporting transactions outside of the financial statement (e.g., outside of the financial statement (e.g., footnotes).footnotes).
Example:Example:• Salaries are recognized as expenses and reduce Salaries are recognized as expenses and reduce
net income.net income.• Executive stock options are often only disclosed Executive stock options are often only disclosed
in the footnotes and not reflected in net in the footnotes and not reflected in net income!income!
8
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
A Word of Caution!A Word of Caution!A Word of Caution!A Word of Caution!
Accounting numbers areAccounting numbers are
neither innocent neither innocent
nor objective!nor objective!
Accounting numbers areAccounting numbers are
neither innocent neither innocent
nor objective!nor objective!
9
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
The Basic Accounting ModelThe Basic Accounting Model
Balance sheet reports the stock view ofBalance sheet reports the stock view ofcorporate resourcescorporate resourcesclaims on those resourcesclaims on those resources
Balance sheet equation:Balance sheet equation:
Assets = Liabilities + Owners’ EquityAssets = Liabilities + Owners’ Equity
Balance sheet reports the stock view ofBalance sheet reports the stock view ofcorporate resourcescorporate resourcesclaims on those resourcesclaims on those resources
Balance sheet equation:Balance sheet equation:
Assets = Liabilities + Owners’ EquityAssets = Liabilities + Owners’ Equity
10
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Income statement provides flow view of the Income statement provides flow view of the CHANGES IN NET ASSETS DUE TO CHANGES IN NET ASSETS DUE TO BUSINESS ACTIVITIESBUSINESS ACTIVITIES
Acceleration of Revenue RecognitionAcceleration of Revenue Recognition• Increases current incomeIncreases current income• Increases current assetsIncreases current assets• Decreases future incomeDecreases future income
Understatement of assets increases income Understatement of assets increases income in subsequent periodsin subsequent periods• Purchase Accounting v Pooling of InterestPurchase Accounting v Pooling of Interest• In-process R&D write offIn-process R&D write off• Asset write downsAsset write downs
11
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Statement of cash flows provides a flow Statement of cash flows provides a flow view of changes in cash balances, broken view of changes in cash balances, broken down by cash provided from/used bydown by cash provided from/used by
Continuing operationsContinuing operations
Discontinued operationsDiscontinued operations
InvestingInvesting
FinancingFinancing
12
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
The Accounting Model: Revenue Recognition
Incur a cost toobtain a benefit
Future benefit or current benefit?
Future benefit can be estimated with reasonable
certainty?
Recognize as assetuntil benefits occur
Expense now
Expense when benefit occurs
Expense now
Current
Future
No
Yes
13
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
An Example: World Inc.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS Dollar amounts in
1,000,000
Years ending December 31
1999 2000 2001Revenues $35,908 $39,090 $35,179
Op
erating
expen
ses
Line costs 14,739 15,462 14,739SG&A 8,935 10,597 11,046Depreciation 4,354 4,878 5,880Other
(8) 0 0
Operating Income $7,888 $8,153 $3,514
14
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Dollar amounts in 1,000,000
Years ended December 31
1999 2000 2001
Operating Income $7,888 $8,153 $3,514Interest expense (966) (970) (1,533)Miscellaneous 242 385 412Income before taxes 7,164 7,568 2,393Provision for Taxes 2,965 3,025 927Minority interest (186) (305) 35Cumulative effect of Accounting change 0 (85) 0
Net Income $4,013 $4,153 $1,501
15
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
An Example: World Inc.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS Common Size Income
Statement
Years ending December 31
1999 2000 2001Revenues 100% 100.00% 100.00%
Op
erating
expen
ses
Line costs 41.05% 39.55% 41.90%SG&A 24.88% 27.11% 31.40%Depreciation 12.13% 12.48% 16.71%Other
-0.02% 0.00% 0.00%
Operating Income 21.97% 20.86% 9.99%
16
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Dollar amounts in 1,000,000December 31
2000 2001Current Assets $9,755 $9,205
Prop
erty &
equ
ipm
ent
Transmission 20,288 23,814Communication 8,100 7,878Furniture and other 9,342 11,263Const. in progress 6,897 5,7060Accum. depreciation
(7,204) (9,852)
Goodwill & other intangibles 46,594 50,537Other 5,131 5,363TOTAL ASSETS $98,903 $103,917
17
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Dollar amounts in 1,000,000December 31
2000 2001Current liabilities $17,673 $9,210
Lon
g-term Long-term debt 20,288 23,814
Deferred taxes 8,100 7,878Other 9,342 11,263
Total liabilities $40,104 $43,890
18
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Dollar amounts in 1,000,000December 31
2000 2001Total liabilities $40,104 $43,890Par value of common stock 29 30Add. Paid-in capital 52,877 54,297Retained earnings 3,160 4,400Unrealized holding gain on marketable securities 345 (51)Cumulative foreign currency translation (817) (562)Treasury stock (185) (185)Total shareholders’ equity 55,409 57,930TOTAL EQUITIES $98,903 $103,917
19
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Example: WorldCom On June 25, WorldCom announced that
$3.8 billion in line costs were capitalized In terms of the diagram on slide 12,
WorldCom treated the $3.8 billion as if there were to benefit future periods
Thus in 2001 and 2002• Assets were overstated by $3.8 billion
• Net income were also overstated by $3.8 billion
20
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
WorldCom Restatement of 2001 Consolidated Statements of Operations
Dollar amounts in 1,000,000 Reported Adjust Corrected
Revenues $35,179 $0 $35,179
Op
erating
expen
ses
Line costs 14,739 +3,055 17,794SG&A 11,046 0 11,046Depreciation 5,880 (382) 5,498Other
0 0 0
Operating Income $3,514 ($2,673) $841
21
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Reported Adjust CorrectedOperating Income
$3,514 ($2,673) $841
Interest expense (1,533) 0 (1,533)Miscellaneous 412 0 412Income before taxes 2,393 (2,673) (280)Provision for Taxes 927 (927) 0Minority interest 35 0 35
Net Income $1,501 ($1,746) ($245)
22
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
To Summarize: WorldCom 2001 Restatements (in $ Millions)
Line costs increased by 3,055 from $14,739 to $17,794
Depreciation decreased by $382from $5,880 to $5,498
Provisions for income taxes decreased by $927,000from $927,000 to $0
Net Income was restatedfrom $1,501 to ($245)
23
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Assessing Earnings QualityAssessing Earnings QualityAssessing Earnings QualityAssessing Earnings Quality
Earnings persistenceEarnings persistence
Cash component of earningsCash component of earnings
Earnings persistenceEarnings persistence
Cash component of earningsCash component of earnings
Earnings quality has two main Earnings quality has two main dimensions:dimensions:Earnings quality has two main Earnings quality has two main dimensions:dimensions:
24
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Organization of the Income Organization of the Income StatementStatement
Income from continuing operationsIncome from continuing operations
Income from discontinued operationsIncome from discontinued operations
Extraordinary gains or losses, net of taxExtraordinary gains or losses, net of tax
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, net of taxprinciples, net of tax
Net income, and earnings per share Net income, and earnings per share (regular and fully diluted)(regular and fully diluted)
25
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Simple Tests to Pick-up the TrailSimple Tests to Pick-up the TrailSimple Tests to Pick-up the TrailSimple Tests to Pick-up the Trail
First, determine quality of earnings: First, determine quality of earnings:
1.1. Where on the income statement is earnings Where on the income statement is earnings recognized? recognized?
2.2. Compare Operating Cash-Flows to Operating Compare Operating Cash-Flows to Operating IncomeIncome
3.3. How stringent are the accounting rules?How stringent are the accounting rules?
4.4. Are there any income-increasing accounting Are there any income-increasing accounting changes?changes?
5.5. Are there any income-increasing transactions?Are there any income-increasing transactions?
First, determine quality of earnings: First, determine quality of earnings:
1.1. Where on the income statement is earnings Where on the income statement is earnings recognized? recognized?
2.2. Compare Operating Cash-Flows to Operating Compare Operating Cash-Flows to Operating IncomeIncome
3.3. How stringent are the accounting rules?How stringent are the accounting rules?
4.4. Are there any income-increasing accounting Are there any income-increasing accounting changes?changes?
5.5. Are there any income-increasing transactions?Are there any income-increasing transactions?
26
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Second, analyze “suspect” accounts:Second, analyze “suspect” accounts: Account Receivables and related allowancesAccount Receivables and related allowances InventoriesInventories IntangiblesIntangibles Other “large accounts” (using common size Other “large accounts” (using common size
statements)statements)
Timing of balance sheet issue date.Timing of balance sheet issue date.Presence of audit report qualifications.Presence of audit report qualifications.
Second, analyze “suspect” accounts:Second, analyze “suspect” accounts: Account Receivables and related allowancesAccount Receivables and related allowances InventoriesInventories IntangiblesIntangibles Other “large accounts” (using common size Other “large accounts” (using common size
statements)statements)
Timing of balance sheet issue date.Timing of balance sheet issue date.Presence of audit report qualifications.Presence of audit report qualifications.
27
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Example: Consumer Products CoExample: Consumer Products CoExample: Consumer Products CoExample: Consumer Products Co
1986 1987 1988Net Sales $76,144 $128,234 $181,123
Cost of Goods Sold $46,213 $70,756 $94,934Selling, Distribution and Administrative $10,366 $14,621 $21,870Advertising $8,557 $26,449 $39,992Research and Development $1,182 $1,530 $2,423Total Operating Expenditures $66,318 $113,356 $159,219
Operating Income $9,826 $14,878 $21,904
Interest Expense $1,930 $1,584 $3,189Income before Income Taxes $7,896 $13,294 $18,715Tax Expense $3,807 $6,189 $7,761
Net Income $4,089 $7,105 $10,954
Years Ended June 30,Income Statement
28
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
1987 1988AssetsCash $514 $885Accounts Receivable, net $28,277 $51,502Allowance for doubtful accounts ($476) ($426)Inventories $19,577 $39,135Other $1,449 $3,015Total Current Assets $49,341 $94,111
Property Plant and Equipment at cost, less accumulated depreciation $14,788 $21,548Other Assets $1,112 $2,481Long-term Assets $15,900 $24,029
Total Assets $65,241 $118,140
June 30,
29
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
1987 1988Current Portion of Long Term Debt $900 $1,250Account Payable $15,072 $13,288Accrued Liabilities $5,468 $4,710Income Taxes Payable $2,619 $3,782Total Current Liabilities $24,059 $23,030
Industrial Revenue Bonds $13,900 $12,650Mississippi State Debt $1,975Bank Debt $5,941 $47,432Total Long-Term Debt $19,841 $62,057
Deferred Taxes $1,254 $1,881
Preferred Stock $1 $1Common Stock at Par $8,018 $8,023Additional Paid-In Capital $12,315 $23,269Cumulative Foreign Currency Translation $126Treasury Stock ($247) ($247)Total Stockholders' Equity $20,087 $31,172
Total Equities $65,241 $118,140
EquitiesJune 30,
30
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Cash Flow Statement Year ended June 30, 1988, Dollar amounts in 000
Cash Flows from OperationsNet Income $10,954Depreciation and Amortization 1,601Deferred Taxes 627Increase in Accounts Receivable (23,275)Increase in Inventories (19,556)Increase in Other Assets (1,566)Decrease in Current Liabilities (1,029)Cash from Operations ($32,246)
31
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Cash Flows from InvestingPurchase of Property Plant and Equipment ($8,148)Other Investment (1,882)Cash Flows form Investing ($9,730)
Cash Flows from FinancingSale of Common Stock $5Net Increase in Debt 42,216Cash Flows form Financing $42,221
32
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Cash Flow Statement Year ended June 30, 1988, Dollar amounts in 000
Cash from Operations ($32,246)Cash Flows form Investing ($9,730)Cash Flows form Financing $42,221
Foreign Currency Adjustments $126Total change in Cash $371
Beginning Cash Balance $514Total change in Cash $371Ending Cash Balance $885
34
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
1987 1988AssetsCash 0.79% 0.75%Accounts Receivable, net 43.34% 43.59%Allowance for doubtful accounts -0.73% -0.36%Inventories 30.01% 33.13%Other 2.22% 2.55%Total Current Assets 75.63% 79.66%
Property Plant and Equipment at cost, less accumulated depreciation 22.67% 18.24%Other Assets 1.70% 2.10%Long-term Assets 24.37% 20.34%
Total Assets 100.00% 100.00%
Common Size Balance SheetJune 30,
38
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
CorrectNet Revenue $280Purchases 225- End Inv. 25Cost of Goods Sold 200Gross Margin $ 80
Gross Margin Ratio 28.6%Ending Inventory 25Accounts Receivable 70
(40,000-5,000) ×$8.00
(45,000) ×$5.00
5,000 ×$5.00
$280,000 - $210,000
39
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Correct (2a)Net Revenue $280 320Purchases 225 225- End Inv. 25 25Cost of Goods Sold 200 200Gross Margin $ 80 $ 120
Gross Margin Ratio 28.6% 37.5%Ending Inventory 25 25Accounts Receivable 70 110
Assume now that the firm does not reduce revenues and Accounts Receivable by the 5,000 units that were returned as defective
(45,000) ×$8.00
$320,000 - $210,000
40
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Correct (2a) (2b)Net Revenue $280 320 320Purchases 225 225 225- End Inv. -25 -25 -50Cost of Goods Sold 200 200 175Gross Margin $ 80 $ 120 $145
Gross Margin Ratio 28.6% 37.5% 45.3%Ending Inventory 25 25 50Accounts Receivable70 110 110
Assume now that the firm does not reduce Revenues and Accounts Receivable by the 5,000 units that were returned as defective but at the same time, increases inventory by those 5,000 units
41
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
The CompanyChange in Accounts Receivable
% Increase in Net Sales = (181,123 - 128,234)/128,123 = 41%% Increase in A/R = (51,076 - 27,801)/27,801= 84%
1987 1988Accounts Receivable Turnover
Net Sales/Ending A/R 4.61 3.55Expressed in days 79 days 103 days
0.741
0.473
0.281 0.278
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr
Sales Growth
Can this growth from FY87 to FY 88 be attributed to a seasonal effect in the company’s sales pattern?
42
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Increases in A/R and Inventory“Normal” and “Abnormal”
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
A/R Inventory
1987 1987 + 28% 1988
Abnormal A/R (15.5)
Abnormal Inventory (14.0)
43
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
The Regina Company
44
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
Regina Company Overview
-$20
-$15
-$10
-$5
$0
$5
$10
$15
1985 1986 1987 1988
Profits
Restated Profits
LBO Favorable review, New products, Disasterwent public triple advertising
45
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
ConclusionsConclusions Accounting numbers are neither innocent Accounting numbers are neither innocent
nor objective!nor objective! You need to understand the incentives of You need to understand the incentives of
the persons producing the numbersthe persons producing the numbers You need to understand the accounting You need to understand the accounting
modelmodel If everything fails, you need ME!If everything fails, you need ME! And, If you don ‘t understand how And, If you don ‘t understand how
strategic other beings are …strategic other beings are …
46
Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Z. Lys. All rights reserved.
FINITOFINITO