36
1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression in human lymphocytes 1,2 Karin A. Sedelies 3 , Thomas J. Sayers 4 , Kirsten M. Edwards 3,9 , Weisan Chen 5 , Daniel G. Pellicci 6,8 , Dale I. Godfrey 6,8 and Joseph A. Trapani 3,7 3 Cancer Immunology Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A’Beckett Street, East Melbourne, 8006, Australia 4 Basic Research program, SAIC-Frederick Inc., NCI Frederick, MD, 21702 5 Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Austin and Repatriation Medical Center, Studley Road, Heidelberg, 3084, Australia 6 Department of Pathology and Immunology, Monash University Medical School, Melbourne, Victoria 3181, Australia. 7 address for correspondence: Dr. J. Trapani, Cancer Immunology Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Locked Bag 1, A’Beckett Street, East Melbourne, 8006, Australia. Email address: [email protected] Phone: +61-3-9656-3726; FAX: +61-3-9656-1411 8 Present address: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia 9 Present address: Department of Pathology and Harvard Centre for Cancer Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 1 JAT and KAS are supported by project grants and a research fellowship (JAT) from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. This work was also JBC Papers in Press. Published on April 6, 2004 as Manuscript M312481200 Copyright 2004 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. by guest on April 3, 2018 http://www.jbc.org/ Downloaded from

1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

  • Upload
    docong

  • View
    217

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

1

Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression in human

lymphocytes1,2

Karin A. Sedelies3, Thomas J. Sayers4, Kirsten M. Edwards3,9, Weisan Chen5, Daniel G.

Pellicci6,8, Dale I. Godfrey6,8 and Joseph A. Trapani3,7

3Cancer Immunology Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1,

A’Beckett Street, East Melbourne, 8006, Australia

4Basic Research program, SAIC-Frederick Inc., NCI Frederick, MD, 21702

5Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Austin and Repatriation Medical Center,

Studley Road, Heidelberg, 3084, Australia

6Department of Pathology and Immunology, Monash University Medical School,

Melbourne, Victoria 3181, Australia.

7address for correspondence: Dr. J. Trapani, Cancer Immunology Laboratory, Peter

MacCallum Cancer Institute, Locked Bag 1, A’Beckett Street, East Melbourne, 8006,

Australia. Email address: [email protected]

Phone: +61-3-9656-3726; FAX: +61-3-9656-1411

8Present address: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of

Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia

9Present address: Department of Pathology and Harvard Centre for Cancer Biology,

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115

1JAT and KAS are supported by project grants and a research fellowship (JAT) from the

National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. This work was also

JBC Papers in Press. Published on April 6, 2004 as Manuscript M312481200

Copyright 2004 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 2: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

2

supported in part by federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes

of Health, under Contract N01-CO-56000. The content of this publication does not

necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human

Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products or organizations imply

endorsement by the US government.

2Abbreviations used in this manuscript: gzm, granzyme; TCC, T cell clone; PBMC,

peripheral blood mononuclear cell; CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocyte; CL, cytotoxic

lymphocyte; NK, natural killer; mAb, monoclonal antibody

Running title: granzyme H regulation in blood leukocytes

Word count excluding tables, references and legends: 5,500

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 3: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

3

Summary

We analyzed the expression of granzyme H in human blood leukocytes, using a novel

mAb raised against recombinant granzyme H. 33kDa granzyme H was easily detected

in unfractionated peripheral blood mononuclear cells, due to its high constitutive

expression in CD3-CD56+ NK cells, whereas granzyme B was less abundant. The NK

lymphoma cell lines, YT and Lopez also expressed high granzyme H levels.

Unstimulated CD4+ and particularly CD8+ T cells expressed far lower levels of

granzyme H than NK cells, and various agents that classically induce T cell activation,

proliferation and enhanced granzyme B expression failed to induce granzyme H

expression in T cells. Also, granzyme H was not detected in NKT cells, monocytes or

neutrophils. There was a good correlation between mRNA and protein expression in

cells that synthesize both granzymes B and H, suggesting that gzmH gene transcription

is regulated similarly to gzmB. Overall, our data indicate that although the gzmB and

gzmH genes are tightly linked, expression of the proteins is quite discordant in T and

NK cells. The finding that granzyme H is frequently more abundant than granzyme B in

NK cells is consistent with a role for granzyme H in complementing the pro-apoptotic

function of granzyme B in human NK cells.

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 4: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

4

Introduction

Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) and natural killer (NK) cells are cytolytic lymphocytes

(CL) that are responsible for inducing rapid apoptosis of virus-infected or transformed

cells (1,2). CL utilize two pathways for killing target cells, both of which require direct

cell contact. The first pathway involves exocytosis of potent toxins from secretory

granules stored in the effector cell cytoplasm, whereas the second is triggered by

clustering of death receptors on the target cell membrane following interaction with

their respective ligands (TNF superfamily members) expressed on the killer cell (1,2).

Cytotoxic granules contain two major types of toxin that co-operatively induce target

cell apoptosis: granzymes (gzms), a family of serine proteases, and a pore-forming

protein, perforin. The precise mechanism of gzm/perforin synergy has not been

clarified, however it is likely that gzms enter the target cell by endocytosis (3,4), while

perforin enables pro-apoptotic gzms access to their substrates in the target cell cytosol

by destabilizing endosomes (5,6). The more traditionally held notion of perforin

permitting access to the cytosol through plasma membrane pores may also apply in

some circumstances (6).

Gzms are closely related to one another structurally, and their genes are clustered in

several loci on distinct chromosomes (7). In both humans and rodents, each locus

encodes proteases with a single broad type of substrate cleavage. Gzms A and K are

trypsin-like proteases (‘tryptases’) that cleave proteins at basic residues, and their genes

are linked on human chromosome 5 (8). Gzm M preferentially cleaves at residues with

long, uncharged side-chains (Met, Leu), and its gene is closely linked to the neutrophil

elastase gene on human chromosome 19 (9). The genes for gzms B and H are located on

chromosome 14, tightly linked with the gene encoding cathepsin G, another

chymotrypsin-like protease (‘chymase’) that, unlike the gzms, is expressed in cells of

the myeloid lineage, but not in lymphocytes (7,10). These three genes all map to within

60kb of one another. Gzm B cleaves its substrates adjacent to acidic residues,

particularly Asp (11), and plays a central role in eliciting death of the target cell by

perturbing mitochondria and activating caspases (12,13). Its absence from the granules

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 5: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

5

of lymphocytes from gene knockout mice slows the rate of target cell DNA damage

(14).

In the mouse, the gene for gzm B is tightly linked to at least four other granzyme genes

predicted to code for functional chymases (gzms C-F), however only one such chymase,

gzm H performs this function in humans (15). Gzm C is now known to possess an

unusual type of pro-apoptotic activity characterised by mitochondrial swelling and

disruption that does not require prior caspase activity (16). However, no such evidence

has yet come forward for human gzm H. We recently showed that recombinant gzm H

expressed in baculovirus-infected insect cells preferentially cleaves substrates with Phe

or Tyr at the P1 position (15). Despite sharing this substrate specificity with mouse

gzms C-F, gzm H has no direct structural equivalent in the mouse, and appears to be a

uniquely human protein. Gzm H has very high amino acid identity (>90%) with many

portions of the gzm B sequence, particularly near the amino-terminus of the molecule

(10), despite performing a distinct enzymic function. It has been inferred from the high

degree of sequence similarity that the gzmH gene arose by duplication of part of the 5’

end of the gzmB gene (particularly exons 3 and 4), and fusion with the 3’ end of an

another primordial serine protease gene (10).

The function of gzm H is unknown, and its study has been greatly hindered by a lack of

reagents able to distinguish it from gzm B at the protein or mRNA levels. The cellular

expression of gzm H has been reported in just one study that assessed gzm H mRNA

expression in human T cells (10). This study concluded that like gzm B, gzm H is

expressed at high levels in activated T cells. However, in another study, a portion of the

gzmH promoter was used to preferentially direct the transgenic expression of SV-40 T

antigen to the mouse lymphoid compartment. The transgene was not activated in allo-

stimulated CTL that expressed high levels of gzm B, but was highly expressed in

activated NK cells and in NK and NK/T cell tumors that arose in these animals (17).

Although the genes encoding cathepsin G and gzms B and H are very tightly linked,

cathepsin G and gzm B have markedly different cellular expression profiles, as

cathepsin G is expressed exclusively by cells of the myeloid lineage, particularly

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 6: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

6

neutrophils and monocytes (18). It is therefore quite feasible that gzms B and H may be

differentially expressed and regulated among leukocyte subsets. The availability of

correctly folded, proteolytically active gzm H enabled us to attempt raising

monospecific reagents for this protease. Having produced a novel gzm H-specific mAb,

we now demonstrate that gzm H is expressed solely in lymphocytes, but its constitutive

expression pattern is quite distinct from that of gzm B, as is its expression in response to

a variety of stimuli that strongly induce gzm B expression.

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 7: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

7

Experimental procedures

Antibodies. Antibodies used in western blotting and immunohistochemistry included

several mAbs made by our laboratory: 2C5 (anti-gzm B) (19), 4H10 (anti-gzm M) (20),

PB2 (anti-perforin) (21) and 7D8 (anti-PI-9) (22). In addition, mAb GB7 (anti-gzm B)

was purchased from Serotec.

Cell lines, tissue samples and immunohistochemistry. The human tumor cell lines

used in this study were all cultured in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% fetal

bovine serum, 2mM L-glutamine, penicillin and streptomycin in a CO2 incubator at

37oC. These included YT (human NK), HL-60 and U937 (human myeloid), Daudi and

Raji (Human B cell), Jurkat and CEM (human T cell), HeLa (cervical carcinoma), Lovo

and COLO205 (colon adenocarcinoma) and MDA-MB-435 (human breast

adenocarcinoma) tumor cell lines. Lysates of homogeneous populations of human T cell

lymphoma samples of two unrelated individuals (derived from lymph node biopsies)

were also analysed. Immunohistochemical studies were performed as described

previously (23).

Recombinant gzm expression. Recombinant human gzm B and gzm H were purified

from the culture supernatants of baculovirus-infected Sf9 cells, 3-5 days after infection,

as described (15). The poly-histidine tagged gzm proteins were purified by nickel

affinity chromatography, and dialysed against PBS. The gzms were tested for their

proteolytic activity by assaying the cleavage of tripeptide substrates Ala-Ala-Asp-S-

benzyl (for gzm B, a kind gift from Drs. Chih-Min Kam and Jim Powers, Georgia

Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.) or Phe-Leu-Phe-S-benzyl (for gzm H, purchased

from Sigma).

mAb production and screening. Five to seven week old female BALB/c mice were

immunised into the peritoneal cavity with purified, recombinant gzm H (50ug) mixed

with Freunds’ complete adjuvant. Two to four weeks later, the mice were boosted with

the same antigen mixed with incomplete adjuvant. Three days following a further

similar immunisation, a mouse was sacrificed and its spleen cells were fused with NS-1

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 8: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

8

mouse myeloma cells, using polyethylene glycol. Ten days later, hybridomas were

screened for secretion of anti-gzm H mAbs, using a solid phase ELISA assay in which

gzm H (or gzm B as a control) was coated onto the wells of a 96-well PVC plate.

Positive hybridomas were cloned by limiting dilution, and the clones expanded and

cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen.

Production of a rabbit polyclonal antiserum. Polyclonal antiserum was raised in

NZW rabbits by immunisation with purified recombinant human gzm B (200ug) mixed

with Freund’s complete adjuvant and injected into multiple sites subcutaneously in

volumes of <0.1 mL. Three booster immunisations were given intramuscularly with

incomplete adjuvant, at 3-4 week intervals.

Isolation of leukocyte subsets. For isolation of neutrophils, cell pellets collected after

Ficoll-Hypaque centrifugation were dispersed in PBS containing 3% dextran and left to

stand at ambient temperature for 30 min to rouleau the red cells. Neutrophils were then

pelleted from the supernatants and resuspended in hypotonic buffer containing 0.2%

NaCl for 1.5 to 2.0 min to lyse the remaining red cells. The tonicity was then adjusted to

0.9% NaCl and the cells were again pelleted and washed. Cells were >95% neutrophils,

by Giemsa staining. Monocytes were sorted from PBMC with anti-CD14 FITC, and

were at least 82% pure. CD3+CD56- T cells and CD3-CD56+ NK cells were purified

from PBMC by FACS sorting, and were reproducibly >96% pure. For isolation of NKT

cells, PBMC were cultured in medium containing IL-2, IL-7 and α-galactosylceramide

(generously provided by Kirin Breweries, Gunma, Japan) for 7 days. Cells that stained

positive with PE-conjugated CD1d/a-galactosylceramide tetramer (generously provided

by Drs Stephané Sidobre and Mitchell Kronenberg, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and

Immunology, CA) and CD3-FITC were collected by FACS sorting, and purity was

found to be 95%.

T and NK cell stimulation. Human PBMC and purified populations of T and NK cells

were incubated in medium supplemented with recombinant human interleukin-2 (IL-2,

100-500 U/mL; Chiron Corporation) and / or PHA (2 ug/mL) or anti-CD3 mAb HIT3A

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 9: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

9

(10ng/mL; BD-Pharmingen) for up to ten days prior to harvest and analysis for gzm

expression.

Protein immunoblotting. Cell lysates were fractionated on 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide

gels, and the proteins electroblotted onto PVDF membranes. Non-specific protein

binding was blocked by pre-incubation with 5% non-fat skim milk in PBS at 4oC for

two hours. Membranes were incubated with mAb (hybridoma culture supernatant,

typically diluted 1/5 to 1/20 in PBS) at 4oC overnight, washed, then bound Ig was

detected with goat anti-mouse Ig conjugated to horse radish peroxidase.

Generation of gzm-specific cDNA probes Northern blotting, and real-time PCR

analysis. cDNA probes specific for the 3’ untranslated regions of gzm B and H

mRNA/cDNA were produced by PCR amplification of each respective cDNA clone,

using synthetic oligonucleotide primers. The gzm B probe was amplified using the

oligonucleotides 5’-GAAACGCTACTAACTACAGG-3’ and 5’-

CCACTCAGCTAAGAGGT-3’ and was 129 nucleotides in length. The gzm H probe

was similarly amplified using the oligonucleotides 5’-AGAACAATGAAGCGCCTC-3’

and 5 '-ACACGCGGCCGCGATCCATTTATTACAGTCC-3’, and was 138 nucleotides

in length. Each probe was purified from 2% agarose gels and labelled with α32P-dATP

by nick translation or random priming with synthetic hexanucleotides. The radiolabelled

probes were used to identify gzm-specific mRNA in Northern blot experiments. Total

cellular RNA was isolated from various populations of human cells and cell lines (10

ug/lane) and separated by electrophoresis on 1% formaldehyde/agarose gels, then

transferred to nylon membranes by capillary transfer. The membrane was allowed to dry

at RT, then baked at 80oC for two hours. Prehybridisation was in buffer containing 50%

formamide, 1% SDS and 5 x SSC (pH 6.8) solution at 42oC. Following hybridisation

with pre-boiled radiolabelled cDNA probe for 16 hours, the filters were washed at low

stringency, then under high stringency conditions (0.1 x SSC, 1% SDS, 60oC for 2 x 20

min), air dried and exposed to X-Ray film (Kodak) for 1-3 days at –80oC. In some

experiments, plasmid DNA was spotted onto nylon membranes (50 ng/spot), then

denatured in NaOH. The membranes were baked at 80oC for two hours, then

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 10: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

10

prehybridised and hybridised as described above. For RT-PCR, 2ug of DNAse-treated

RNA was reverse transcribed using M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase Rnase H minus,

Point Mutant (Promega). PCR primers for each gene were designed using Primer

Express Software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), with a melting

temperature at 58-60°C and a resulting product of 75-150bp. Triplicate 20ul PCR

reactions were carried out using SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystem),

initially for 15 min at 95°C, followed by 25 cycles of 95°C for 30 seconds and 60°C for

30 seconds in the ABI Prism 7700 sequence detection system. The levels of gzm H and

B mRNA were normalised to that of ribosomal protein L32. Primer pairs were as

follows: L32 forward 5′- TTCCTGGTCCACAACGTCAAG-3′, reverse 5′-

TGTGAGCGATCTCGGCAC- 3′; gzm B forward 5′-

GCGGTGGCTTCCTGATACAAG- 3′, reverse 5′- CCCCCAAGGTGACATTTATGG-

3′; gzm H forward 5′- TGGCGGCATCCTAGTGAGAA- 3′, reverse 5′-

GCCCCCAAGGTGACATTTATG- 3′. Primer efficiency for gzms B and H was

demonstrated by the overlapping amplification profiles of equal quantities of gzm B and

H cDNA.

Granule fractionation. For cell fractionation experiments, YT human NK tumor cells

(3 x 10e8) were harvested, washed several times in PBS and lysed by nitrogen

cavitation, as described (24). The cell lysate was fractionated on a continuous Percoll

density gradient as described, and 1mL fractions were collected, starting with the dense

(bottom) end of the gradient. Following the removal of Percoll by ultracentrifugation,

aliquots of each fraction were analysed by SDS-PAGE and western blot.

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 11: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

11

Results

In order to determine the cellular and sub-cellular expression of gzm H, it was first

necessary to produce an antiserum that could distinguish it from other granzymes,

particularly its closest structural relative gzm B, with which it shares approximately

75% amino acid identity (25). We have previously expressed and purified catalytically

active gzm H secreted by baculovirus-infected insect cells (15), so this protein was used

as an immunogen for mAb production in BALB/c mice. Of 800 hybridoma culture

supernatants screened for mAb secretion in a solid phase ELISA assay, 48 were found

to secrete an Ig that bound to gzm H. All but one of these mAbs produced an equivalent

signal when tested on purified gzm B, indicating they detected an epitope common to

both granzymes (data not shown). However, the mAb produced by hybridoma 4G5

specifically recognised gzm H, and failed to react with gzm B in the ELISA assay

(Figure 1A). Conversely, mAb 2C5, which we have used extensively in studies on gzm

B (12,13,19,26,27), was specific for gzm B and failed to recognise gzm H. MAb 4G5

detected as little as 3 ng gzm H, but did not react at all with gzm B in western blots

(Figure 1B). In the reciprocal experiment, mAb 2C5 reacted strongly with gzm B in

western blots, but did not react with gzm H (data not shown). By contrast with both

mAbs, a polyclonal rabbit antiserum raised against gzm B showed strong cross-

reactivity with gzm H, once again demonstrating the close structural similarity of the

two granzymes (Figure 1B). Interestingly, mAb GB7, a commercially available reagent

purported to specifically detect gzmB, produced an equivalent signal with gzms B and

H (Figure 1C). Similar analyses using other recombinant granzymes also demonstrated

that both 4G5 and 2C5 did not react with recombinant human gzm M, a more distant

relative of gzms B and H (approximately 35% amino acid identity; data not shown) (7).

Having shown that 4G5 specifically detects gzm H, we next used the mAb in western

blotting on whole cell lysates made from a series of hemopoietic and non-hemopoietic

cells lines. The human NK leukemia cell lines YT (Figure 2) and Lopez (data not

shown) both demonstrated a 33kDa protein that co-migrated with recombinant gzmH.

The predicted molecular mass on reduced SDS-PAGE was consistent with a gzm H

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 12: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

12

polypeptide backbone of 26kDa (deduced from the cDNA sequence) and approximately

7kDa of added carbohydrate. Gzm H was not expressed by the acute T cell leukemia

lines Jurkat and CEM, the B lymphoma cell lines Daudi and Raji, the myeloid cell lines

HL-60 and U937, or cells from two lymph node biopsies excised from patients with

disseminated T cell lymphoma. Similarly, no signal was detectable in the human

carcinoma cell lines 293 (embryonal kidney), HeLa (cervical), or the adenocarcinomas

Lovo, COLO 205 and MDA-MB435. As Lopez and YT cells both contain large

numbers of cytolytic granules and also express perforin and gzms B and M (24), the co-

expression of gzm H by these cells lines was consistent with a possible role for gzm H

in cytotoxic granule-mediated cell death.

To determine the subcellular localisation of gzm H, we initially performed

immunohistochemistry on pelleted YT cells, using mAbs 2C5 (anti-gzmB) and 4H10

(anti-gzmM) as controls (Figure 3A). As was shown previously, gzms B and M were

localised to granules in the cytoplasm of YT cells (20,26). Cytoplasmic staining in YT

cells was also observed with the gzmH mAb, however the strength of the staining varied

considerably from cell to cell: some YT cells (about 50%) stained strongly, a minority

stained weakly, and the remainder (about 25%) showed no staining. The heterogeneity

of staining was not due to limiting Ig, as similar numbers of strongly and weakly

staining cells were observed over a range of antiserum concentrations (data not shown).

None of the granzyme mAbs bound to Jurkat cells, which were used as a negative

control in this experiment (see Figure 2). To definitively demonstrate gzmH localization

to cytotoxic granules, a lysate of mechanically disrupted YT cells was fractionated on a

Percoll density gradient (Figure 3B). The fractions were analysed by western blotting

with antibodies specific for gzms B and H, perforin and the serpin, PI-9 which is

localised to the cytosol of CL rather than granules (26). Gzm H was co-localized with

the granule proteins perforin and gzmB in fractions 6-8 at the dense end of the gradient

(specific gravity 1.10-1.13 g/mL, data not shown). Fractions 6-8 were free of PI-9,

which is abundant in the cytosol of YT cells (represented by the least dense fractions,

14-18), but is not a significant constituent of the granules (26).

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 13: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

13

Almost all of the human and rodent granzymes described to date are expressed

constitutively by NK cells and in an inducible manner by CD8+ (and some CD4+) T

cells, when they become activated and adopt an effector phenotype (28). The two

granzymes known to play a pivotal role in target cell apoptosis, gzm B, which is

encoded by a gene that is very tightly linked to that of gzm H, and gzm A, encoded on a

different chromosome, Chr 5 (8) are both regulated in this way. One exception to this

general “rule” is gzm M, which is constitutively expressed by NK cells but not by

human or rodent T cells when they become activated (20,23). We therefore wished to

determine which leukocyte subsets (if any) in normal human peripheral blood express

gzmH, both in their quiescent state, or following exposure to activating stimuli.

Initially, we subjected unfractionated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from

normal individuals to western blotting, either prior to, or after exposure to agents that

cause T cell activation and proliferation in vitro (Figure 4A). Surprisingly, freshly

isolated, unstimulated PBMC from unrelated donors showed strong constitutive gzm H

expression, whereas the expression of gzm B by the same cells was very low or absent

(Figure 4 A). From past studies, gzmB is known to be expressed at low levels in

unstimulated NK cells (23) and is induced from very low levels in stimulated CD4+ and

CD8+ T cells (10,29-31). Consistent with this pattern of expression, exposure of PBMC

to the T cell stimuli IL-2 and anti-CD3 mAb (Figure 4A) over 4 day time course

experiments caused a strong induction of gzmB protein. The response to IL-2/anti-CD3

had peaked within 24 h, then declined slightly from days 2 to 4. Next, we sorted fresh

PBMC into CD3+CD56- T cells and CD3-CD56+ NK cells (Figure 4B). The T cells

constitutively expressed no gzm B and low levels of gzm H, while the NK cells gave a

strong signal for gzm H, and a substantially weaker signal for gzm B. As NK cells make

up only 2-5% of PBMC, it is likely that gzm B would be undetectable in western

analysis of unfractionated PBMC in most instances (Figure 4A). Exposure of the T cells

to IL-2/PHA caused a strong and continual up-regulation of gzm B levels up till day

four. By stark contrast, the level of gzm H expression did not increase above

constitutive levels but remained constant (Figure 4B). In purified NK cells exposed to

IL-2, the levels of gzm H remained unchanged, whereas gzm B levels increased

somewhat (Figure 4B).

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 14: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

14

To further define which cell types were responsible for gzm H expression, we next

examined more highly purified PBMC subsets (Figure 5). As shown previously, gzm H

was expressed at very high levels in unstimulated CD3-CD56+ NK cells, and at far

lower levels in unstimulated CD4+/CD8+ T cells (Figure 5A). Consistent with previous

observations, the unstimulated NK cells also expressed small amounts of gzm B and far

larger quantities of gzm M (23). Purified CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were also examined

separately for granzyme expression upon in vitro stimulation with PHA and IL-2. Again

consistent with previous findings, both T cell subsets expressed large amounts of gzm

B, whereas gzm M was undetectable. Gzm H was expressed in activated CD4+ cells,

but contrary to previous reports (10) the level of expression was not increased in

comparison with unstimulated CD4+ cells. Despite expressing large quantities of gzm

B, the stimulated CD8+ T cells expressed no detectable gzmH (Figure 5A). As NK cells

expressed large quantities of gzm H, we were also interested in whether NKT cells also

expressed gzm H. As the number of NKT cells in PBMC is typically only 0.1%,

unfractionated PBMC from a healthy donor were stimulated in vitro with IL-2, IL-7 and

α-galactosylceramide for 7 days. This resulted in the proportion of cells staining with

PE-labelled CD1d/α-galactosylceramide tetramer increasing to approximately 1.5%

(data not shown). When these NKT cells were sorted to homogeneity and analysed by

protein immunoblotting (Figure 5B), they were found to lack expression of gzm H,

whereas small amounts of gzm B were expressed. Neither polymorphonuclear

leukocytes nor monocytes expressed detectable gzmH (Figure 5B). It was therefore

concluded that gzm H is expressed predominantly by NK cells and weakly by CD4+ T

cells, but not by CD8+ T cells in unstimulated human peripheral blood. A number of

stimuli that strongly induce gzm B expression had no effect on gzm H protein levels.

Absence of 4G5 reactivity with myeloid cells indicated that this mAb does not cross-

react with cathepsin G, a closely related serine protease expressed at high levels in

myeloid cells, but not at all in lymphocytes (18).

Our results were not in agreement with a previous report that indicated gzm H is

inducible upon T cell activation (10). This study was performed without the benefit of a

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 15: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

15

specific gzm H antiserum, and relied on mRNA expression studies performed with

cDNA probes. To determine whether the previous findings may have resulted from

cross-reactivity of the gzm H cDNA probe with gzm B mRNA, we generated probes

specific for gzm B and gzm H mRNAs, based on unique, gzm-specific sequences

located in the 3’ untranslated regions of both genes. Unlike the respective full-length

gzmB and gzm H cDNAs, which cross-reacted strongly, even under highly stringent

hybridisation and washing conditions (Figure 6), the 3’ untranslated region probes were

highly specific for gzms B and H (Figure 6A, bottom panel). Neither set of probes

reacted with gzm A, which has a far lower degree of sequence similarity with both gzm

H and gzm B. This result shows the importance of checking for possible cross-reactivity

of all reagents purported to specifically detect either gzm B or H.

The gzmH and gzmB genes are tightly linked to that encoding cathepsin G, and all three

proteases share considerable structural and sequence similarity. Our demonstration that

gzmH protein is not expressed in myeloid cells clearly indicates that gene sequences

regulating cell-specific expression of gzm H and Cathepsin G have not been conserved.

It is also known that myeloid cells store large quantities of cathepsin G in their

cytoplasmic granules, but produce mRNA only during the promyelocyte stage of

development, switching off gene transcription during cell maturation (32). To determine

whether mature NK cells store gzm H protein in the absence of its mRNA, we used gzm

B- and gzm H-specific primers to perform quantitative real-time PCR analysis of sorted

CD3-CD56+ peripheral blood NK cells. We were able to detect mRNA encoding both

gzms B and H (Figure 7). While gzm H protein was considerably more abundant than

gzm B in NK cells (see above), gzm B and gzm H mRNAs were about equally abundant

in freshly isolated NK cells, when compared to a control mRNA, L32. Therefore, gzmH

gene transcripts are still present in mature NK cells, unlike the case with CatG

transcripts in myeloid cells (34).

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 16: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

16

Discussion

We have produced a new mAb, 4G5 that specifically detects gzm H and used it to

compare the expression of gzms B and H in a variety of cell lines and human primary

cells. The two gzms have very similar amino acid sequences (approximately 75%

sequence identity) and are predicted to have similar three-dimensional structures, as

both are chymotrypsin-like serine proteases. It was therefore essential to firstly show

that 4G5 and the anti-gzm B mAb used in this study, 2C5, react specifically with their

respective target antigens. This was demonstrated in several ways. Firstly, the mAb

produced by hybridoma 4G5 was unique among 48 mAbs produced that recognized

recombinant gzm H in that it failed to recognise gzm B in a solid phase ELISA assay.

As we were specifically attempting to produce a gzm H-specific mAb, screening for

cross-reactivity with gzm B was included in the initial screen of hybridoma

supernatants, enabling the other 47 mAbs to be eliminated. Secondly, the specificity of

4G5 for gzm H was shown in western blot analysis using purified proteins as targets. As

recombinant proteins were used, there was no possibility that either mAb was actually

detecting small amounts of an alternative gzm present as a contaminant. Thirdly,

immunohistochemical staining of the human NK tumor cell line YT demonstrated

markedly different patterns of staining for gzms B and H. Whereas gzm B staining was

uniform and strong across all cells, gzm H staining was identified only in a subset of

cells, and the strength of staining varied considerably from cell to cell. We are currently

attempting to ascertain the factors that govern gzmH expression in individual YT cells.

This study has raised a number of unexpected results. The major finding is that the

expression of gzms B and H is quite discordant in human lymphocyte subsets, both in

unstimulated T and NK cells, and when the cells were stimulated with a variety of

agents that induce activation and proliferation. For example, gzm H is constitutively

expressed at high levels in peripheral blood NK cells, whereas gzm B is expressed at

much lower levels by the same cells. Stimuli that typically induce strong gzm B

expression also had little effect on gzm H levels in either T or NK cells exposed to

various cytokines and mitogens. Previously, Heusel and colleagues also used sensitive

nuclease protection assays to show a likely discrepancy in gzm B and H regulation in

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 17: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

17

human lymphocytes, with highest levels of gzm H mRNA identified in stimulated NK

cells, but virtually none in T cells (33). Human NK cell (large granular lymphocyte)

tumors have also been shown to express mRNA for both gzms B and H in microarray

studies that are said to have used nucleic acid probes that can distinguish between the

two gzms (34). Thus, contrary to previous belief, the principal gzms expressed by

resting NK cells are gzms H (this report), A and M (23), not gzm B. By contrast, the

expression of all gzms is elevated in both of the NK tumor cell lines (YT and Lopez)

that have been examined to date (23,31). The findings in primary NK cells raise the

important question of how NK cells achieve target cell apoptosis when they express low

levels of gzm B, which is thought to have the strongest pro-apoptotic activity of any of

the gzms. In the absence of gzm B, gzms A, M and H would all be candidates to fulfil a

pro-apoptotic function, individually or jointly. While CD3-CD56+ circulating NK cells

expressed large amounts of gzmH, the very low numbers of circulating NKT cells in

peripheral blood meant that it was not possible to determine whether unstimulated NKT

cells also express gzm H. In order to recover enough cells for analysis, we expanded the

NKT cells in IL-2 and IL-7, raising the possibility that these stimuli may have down-

regulated gzmH expression during in vitro culture.

The pattern of expression of gzm H protein was again quite distinct from that of gzm B

in peripheral blood T lymphocytes that were stimulated in various ways in relatively

short term cultures in vitro. All of the stimuli examined in this study led to very marked

induction of gzmB protein, both in CD4+ and CD8+ PBMC. However, gzm H protein

was expressed at low levels in CD4+ T cells, but was not detected in CD8+ T cells and

was not induced by mitogens and mediators of T cell activation including IL-2, PHA,

concanavalin A and anti-CD3 used alone or in various combinations. Collectively our

data clearly indicate that gzms B and H, the products of very tightly linked genes, are

nevertheless regulated in very distinct ways. Despite this, the real-time PCR data

presented in this study also indicate that regulation of the gzmH gene is dissimilar to

CatG as CatG mRNA is not found once myeloid cell maturation occurs. That is, the

regulation of all three closely-linked genes is unique.

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 18: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

18

By contrast with the monoclonal reagents used in this study, polyclonal antisera raised

against gzm B (Figure 1B) or gzm H (data not shown) were strongly reactive with both

gzms, as were 47/48 of the mAbs raised against recombinant gzmH. This indicates that

at least one epitope shared between the two closely related gzms is commonly

recognised by mice and other species. Given the close structural similarities between

human granzymes, we anticipated it might be problematic to produce monospecific

mouse antisera when we started to produce anti-gzm mAbs some years ago. Initially,

our strategy was to identify stretches of the gzm amino acid sequence that were

hydrophilic (suggesting orientation to the exterior of the protease) and polymorphic

among the gzms of that species. When we used synthetic polypeptides corresponding to

such portions of gzm sequences to immunise mice, we identified an apparent

immunodominant epitope mapping between residues 139 and 158 (using the N terminal

isoleucine residue of processed gzm B as residue 1) (35). These peptides proved useful

for producing monospecific mAbs for gzmB (2C5, used in the present study) (19) and

gzmM (20). However, peptides from the corresponding region of gzm H largely

produced mAbs (in many independent fusions) that were able to detect the immunising

peptide, but not native gzmH (data not shown). The availability of recombinant,

correctly folded gzmH produced in baculovirus-infected cells has allowed us to

successfully revisit this difficult endeavour.

As with serological reagents, the current study also shows that full-length cDNA probes

used in Northern blot analysis do not specifically detect either gzm B or H. Rather, we

propose that shorter cDNAs spanning the unique 3’ untranslated regions of both genes

are far more suitable for Northern blotting and related assays such as in situ

hybridisation. For other purposes, the use of gzm-specific primers for PCR

amplification may be a suitable alternative. As the reagents purporting to detect gzm B

are increasingly coming into use for diagnostic purposes both in inflammatory and

neoplastic diseases (36-38), we urge extreme caution when interpreting results obtained

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 19: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

19

with mAbs or DNA probes whose reactivity with other gzm family members and

cathepsin G has not been adequately excluded.

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 20: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

20

References

1. Barry, M., and Bleackley, R. C. (2002) Nat Rev Immunol 2, 401-409 2. Trapani, J. A., and Smyth, M. J. (2002) Nat Rev Immunol 2, 735-747 3. Motyka, B., Korbutt, G., Pinkoski, M. J., Heibein, J. A., Caputo, A.,

Hobman, M., Barry, M., Shostak, I., Sawchuk, T., Holmes, C. F., Gauldie, J., and Bleackley, R. C. (2000) Cell 103, 491-500

4. Trapani, J. A., Sutton, V. R., Thia, K. Y., Li, Y. Q., Froelich, C. J., Jans, D. A., Sandrin, M. S., and Browne, K. A. (2003) J Cell Biol 160, 223-233

5. Froelich, C. J., Orth, K., Turbov, J., Seth, P., Gottlieb, R., Babior, B., Shah, G. M., Bleackley, R. C., Dixit, V. M., and Hanna, W. (1996) J Biol Chem 271, 29073-29079

6. Browne, K. A., Blink, E., Sutton, V. R., Froelich, C. J., Jans, D. A., and Trapani, J. A. (1999) Mol Cell Biol 19, 8604-8615

7. Smyth, M. J., O'Connor, M. D., and Trapani, J. A. (1996) J Leukoc Biol 60, 555-562

8. Baker, E., Sayers, T. J., Sutherland, G. R., and Smyth, M. J. (1994) Immunogenetics 40, 235-237

9. Smyth, M. J., Sayers, T. J., Wiltrout, T., Powers, J. C., and Trapani, J. A. (1993) J Immunol 151, 6195-6205

10. Haddad, P., Jenne, D., Tschopp, J., Clement, M. V., Mathieu-Mahul, D., and Sasportes, M. (1991) Int Immunol 3, 57-66

11. Odake, S., Kam, C. M., Narasimhan, L., Poe, M., Blake, J. T., Krahenbuhl, O., Tschopp, J., and Powers, J. C. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 2217-2227

12. Sutton, V. R., Davis, J. E., Cancilla, M., Johnstone, R. W., Ruefli, A. A., Sedelies, K., Browne, K. A., and Trapani, J. A. (2000) J Exp Med 192, 1403-1414

13. Sutton, V. R., Wowk, M. E., Cancilla, M., and Trapani, J. A. (2003) Immunity 18, 319-329

14. Heusel, J. W., Wesselschmidt, R. L., Shresta, S., Russell, J. H., and Ley, T. J. (1994) Cell 76, 977-987

15. Edwards, K. M., Kam, C. M., Powers, J. C., and Trapani, J. A. (1999) J Biol Chem 274, 30468-30473

16. Johnson, H., Scorrano, L., Korsmeyer, S. J., and Ley, T. J. (2003) Blood 101, 3093-3101

17. MacIvor, D. M., Pham, C. T., and Ley, T. J. (1999) Blood 93, 963-973

18. Hohn, P. A., Popescu, N. C., Hanson, R. D., Salvesen, G., and Ley, T. J. (1989) J Biol Chem 264, 13412-13419

19. Trapani, J. A., Browne, K. A., Dawson, M., and Smyth, M. J. (1993) Biochem Biophys Res Commun 195, 910-920

20. Smyth, M. J., O'Connor, M. D., Kelly, J. M., Ganesvaran, P., Thia, K. Y., and Trapani, J. A. (1995) Biochem Biophys Res Commun 217, 675-683

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 21: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

21

21. Geisberg, M., Trapani, J. A., and Dupont, B. (1990) Tissue Antigens 35, 229-233

22. Hirst, C. E., Buzza, M. S., Sutton, V. R., Trapani, J. A., Loveland, K. L., and Bird, P. I. (2001) Mol Hum Reprod 7, 1133-1142

23. Sayers, T. J., Brooks, A. D., Ward, J. M., Hoshino, T., Bere, W. E., Wiegand, G. W., Kelly, J. M., Smyth, M. J., and Kelley, J. M. (2001) J Immunol 166, 765-771

24. Davis JE, S. V., Browne KA, Trapani JA. (2003) Journal of Immunological Methods

25. Klein, J. L., Selvakumar, A., Trapani, J. A., and Dupont, B. (1990) Tissue Antigens 35, 220-228

26. Sun, J., Bird, C. H., Sutton, V., McDonald, L., Coughlin, P. B., De Jong, T. A., Trapani, J. A., and Bird, P. I. (1996) J Biol Chem 271, 27802-27809

27. Sutton, V. R., Vaux, D. L., and Trapani, J. A. (1997) J Immunol 158, 5783-5790

28. Trapani, J. A. (1998) Int Rev Cytol 182, 111-192 29. Liu, C. C., Rafii, S., Granelli-Piperno, A., Trapani, J. A., and Young,

J. D. (1989) J Exp Med 170, 2105-2118 30. Smyth, M. J., Ortaldo, J. R., Shinkai, Y., Yagita, H., Nakata, M.,

Okumura, K., and Young, H. A. (1990) J Exp Med 171, 1269-1281 31. Trapani, J. A., Klein, J. L., White, P. C., and Dupont, B. (1988) Proc

Natl Acad Sci U S A 85, 6924-6928 32. Hanson RD, C. N., Burnett D, Campbell EJ, Senior RM, Ley TJ.

(1990) J.Biol. Chem. 265, 1524-1530 33. Heusel, J. W., Hanson, R. D., Silverman, G. A., and Ley, T. J.

(1991) J Biol Chem 266, 6152-6158 34. Kothapalli, R., Bailey, R. D., Kusmartseva, I., Mane, S., Epling-

Burnette, P. K., and Loughran, T. P., Jr. (2003) Int J Oncol 22, 33-39 35. Apostolidis, V. A., Browne, K. A., Smyth, M. J., and Trapani, J. A.

(1995) Mol Immunol 32, 909-917 36. Tak, P. P., Spaeny-Dekking, L., Kraan, M. C., Breedveld, F. C.,

Froelich, C. J., and Hack, C. E. (1999) Clin Exp Immunol 116, 366-370

37. Medema, J. P., de Jong, J., Peltenburg, L. T., Verdegaal, E. M., Gorter, A., Bres, S. A., Franken, K. L., Hahne, M., Albar, J. P., Melief, C. J., and Offringa, R. (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98, 11515-11520

38. Netto, M. V., Fonseca, B. A., Dantas, M., Saber, L. T., Castro, M. C., and Ferraz, A. S. (2002) Transplant Proc 34, 476-478

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 22: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

22

Figure Legends.

Figure 1. Specificity of anti-gzm B and H mAbs. (A) Solid-phase ELISA assay

in which serially diluted mAbs raised against human gzm B peptide (2C5, Ref. 19)

and recombinant gzm H (4G5, this study) were tested on both recombinant purified

gzms. (B) Western blot showing reactivity of 4G5 (tissue culture supernatant,

diluted 1/10) and a polyclonal rabbit antiserum raised against recombinant human

gzmB (1/1000) with various quantities of each recombinant gzm protein. (C)

Western blot showing reactivity of mAbs 4G5, 2C5 and GB7, which has been

considered to react specifically with gzmB, with recombinant gzms B and H.

Figure 2. Expression of gzmH in human tumor cell lines. Western blot analysis

of whole cell lysates derived from a variety of hemopoietic and non-hemopoietic

tumor cell lines and two primary T cell lymphomas, as described in Materials and

Methods. The same panel of lysates was also probed with a mAb detecting tubulin,

as a loading control. Rc gzm H = recombinant gzm H, which was run as a positive

control. The numerals at left indicate the migration of molecular size markers in

kDa.

Figure 3. Expression of gzms B, H and M in YT NK leukemia cells. (A)

Immunohistochemical analysis of YT and Jurkat (human T cell leukemia) cells,

probed with mAbs specifically detecting gzms B, H and M (see Materials and

Methods). (B) Western blot analysis of alternate Percoll density gradient fractions

of a cytoplasmic lysate of YT cells. The numerals indicate fraction numbers,

collected from the bottom (dense) end of the gradient (see Materials and Methods).

The fractions were probed with mAbs specific for gzmH (4G5), the known granule

proteins gzmB (2C5) and perforin (PB2), and PI-9 (7D8), which is absent from

granules, but located in the cytosol.

Figure 4. Expression of gzms B and H in activated human PBMC. (A) Western

blot analysis with mAbs 4G5 (anti-gzm H) and 2C5 (anti-gzm B) of whole cell

lysates of unstimulated PBMC (day 0; 5x10e6 cells per lane) and of similar

numbers of cells cultured in medium supplemented with IL-2 and anti-CD3 mAb

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 23: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

23

for the number of days indicated. (B) Western blot analysis of whole cell lysates of

unstimulated CD3+CD56- T and CD3-CD56+ NK cells (day 0; 5x10e6 cells per

lane) and of similar numbers of cells cultured in medium supplemented with

PHA/IL-2 (T cells) or 100 U/mL IL-2 (NK cells) for the number of days indicated.

Figure 5. Expression of gzms B, H and M in human lymphocyte subsets. (A)

Western blot analysis of whole cell lysates of unstimulated human CD3-CD56+

NK cells, unstimulated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (CD4/CD8) and CD4+ or CD8+ T

cells cultured with PHA and IL-2 for 5 days. The expression of tubulin was used as

a loading control. (B) Western blot analysis of whole cell lysates of peripheral

blood NKT cells expanded in culture medium supplemented with IL-2 and IL-7 for

seven days, unstimulated CD3-CD56+ NK cells, and freshly isolated

polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) and monocytes. Staining with an anti-serpin

antibody that detects the serpin PAI-2 was used as a loading control.

Figure 6. Expression of gzm B and H mRNA in YT cells and human PBMC.

DNA dot blot analysis in which full length cDNAs encoding human gzms A, B and

H cloned into the plasmid vector, pBLUESCRIPT KS+ were spotted onto nylon

filters (50ng/spot). cDNA encoding the human non-granzyme protein IFI 16 was

used as negative control. Replicate filters were probed and washed under high

stringency conditions with 32P-dATP-labelled, full-length, purified cDNA inserts

encoding gzm B (B) or gzmH (H), or with plasmid DNA (KS+). Lower panel:

Similar filters spotted with cDNAs encoding gzms A, B or H were probed and

washed under high stringency conditions with 32P-dATP-labelled, purified PCR-

generated DNA probes specific for the 3’ untranslated sequences of human gzmB

(3’B) or gzmH (3’H) cDNA (see Materials and Methods).

Figure 7. mRNAs encoding gzms B and H are both expressed in unstimulated

CD3-CD56+ NK cells. Real-time PCR amplification of RNA extracted from

freshly isolated, purified CD3-CD56+ peripheral blood NK cells and unfractionated

PBMC of a normal donor. The result is expressed as the mean expression level ±

standard deviation of triplicate assays, relative to L32 mRNA. The data shown are

representative of four experiments carried out with RNA from two unrelated

donors.

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 24: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 25: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 26: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 27: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 28: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 29: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 30: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 31: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 32: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 33: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 34: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 35: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 36: 1 Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression

Dale I. Godfrey and Joseph A. TrapaniKarin A. Sedelies, Thomas J. Sayers, Kirsten M. Edwards, Weisan Chen, Daniel G. Pellicci,

lymphocytesDiscordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression in human

published online April 6, 2004J. Biol. Chem. 

  10.1074/jbc.M312481200Access the most updated version of this article at doi:

 Alerts:

  When a correction for this article is posted• 

When this article is cited• 

to choose from all of JBC's e-mail alertsClick here

by guest on April 3, 2018

http://ww

w.jbc.org/

Dow

nloaded from