Upload
james-webb
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Discussion Item: New Satellite SystemDo we need (new) standards?
NexSAT Steering Group9th March 2006, Toulouse
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
2
Developments
INMARSAT SwiftBroadband Consideration for ATS
IRIDIUM Started the ICAO process
MTSAT AMSS + ?
Navisat
SGB
ESA plans
ICAO New generic AMSR(S) SARPS New approach: performance based
New concept of operations
OperatioTechnological Developments AFCDG / FCI investigations SESAR
EUROCAE / RTCA / AEEC / ?
3
ECTL FCI:A scenario for 2020
NewTerrestrialSystem(s)
SatelliteSystem A
SatelliteSystem B
VHF
VHF
4
SwiftBroadband Feasibility Study:WP2 - Competitive Issues
The report maintains that competition is necessary and good. however where competition exists…
Interoperability is essential! Means to ensure interoperability
Acceptability Criteria AMS(R)S SARPS Technical Manual
The pragmatic approach…..
ANSPs should make that the job of their service provider!
5
Discussion Thoughts - Points
Interoperability – Internetworking
What are the means to ensure interoperability?
What is the emerging common vision (assuming there is one)?
Can we envisage (in the future) different satellite payload operated/owned by different entities (commercial and/or public) supporting transparent to the user global coverage?
Are the new generic SARPs sufficient? Do we need something else?
Minimum boxes?
Who pays for the development of a standard?