12
1 EEC’s Proposed Regulations: Overview and Update A New Approach to Group, School-Age and Family Child Care Regulations

1 EECs Proposed Regulations: Overview and Update A New Approach to Group, School-Age and Family Child Care Regulations

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Health and Safety Oral Health Including Tooth Brushing Background:  Original draft: children >1 year old who get 2 meals/day must have opportunity to brush.  Informal comment: 54% liked idea but many raised implementation and sanitation concerns.  EEC’s Board stressed importance for overall good health and that many programs already brush. Considerations:  1 in 4 MA kindergartners have dental decay; 50% of which goes untreated.  Low income children are disproportionately affected (almost 2X).  Early tooth loss is linked to failure to thrive, impaired speech development, poor concentration, and reduced self-esteem.  CDC is unaware of adverse health effects directly related to tooth brushing.  Training materials to help programs implement tooth brushing are readily available.  Storage may be an issue for some programs.  Some school age programs serve large numbers of children and have limited program time.  Materials and training costs.

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 EECs Proposed Regulations: Overview and Update A New Approach to Group, School-Age and Family Child Care Regulations

1

EEC’s Proposed Regulations: Overview and Update

A New Approach to Group, School-Age and Family Child Care Regulations

Page 2: 1 EECs Proposed Regulations: Overview and Update A New Approach to Group, School-Age and Family Child Care Regulations

2

EEC’s Proposed Regulations

Background: EEC Board was updated on the proposed regulations at its March 10,

2009 meeting. The Board had questions in three specific areas:

• tooth brushing, • fall zones in family child care, and • percent of required professional development that should address

diverse learners. Small workgroups from the Regulation Review Team revisited each of

these issues with the Board’s questions in mind. Their work was presented to the Board’s Programs and Policy Committee

on March 30, 2009. The Programs and Policy Committee made recommendations to the

Board on these issues.

Page 3: 1 EECs Proposed Regulations: Overview and Update A New Approach to Group, School-Age and Family Child Care Regulations

3

7.11 Health and Safety Oral Health Including Tooth Brushing

Background: Original draft: children >1 year old who get 2 meals/day must have

opportunity to brush. Informal comment: 54% liked idea but many raised implementation and

sanitation concerns. EEC’s Board stressed importance for overall good health and that many

programs already brush.

Considerations: 1 in 4 MA kindergartners have dental decay; 50% of which goes untreated. Low income children are disproportionately affected (almost 2X). Early tooth loss is linked to failure to thrive, impaired speech development, poor concentration, and reduced self-esteem. CDC is unaware of adverse health effects directly related to tooth brushing. Training materials to help programs implement tooth brushing are readily available. Storage may be an issue for some programs. Some school age programs serve large numbers of children and have limited program time. Materials and training costs.

Page 4: 1 EECs Proposed Regulations: Overview and Update A New Approach to Group, School-Age and Family Child Care Regulations

4

7.11 Health and Safety Oral Health Including Tooth Brushing

Options discussed:Don’t require; address with technical assistance and resources (current proposal).Require for children who get snacks or meals in all programs.Require for children in family child care homes and group child care centers. Programs that are only school age must give children an opportunity to brush.

Recommendations by the Committee for the Board:1.Revise the regulations to require tooth brushing in all programs that children attend for more than 4 hours or include a meal.2.Make technical assistance and resources available to all programs whether or not they are required to brush teeth.

Page 5: 1 EECs Proposed Regulations: Overview and Update A New Approach to Group, School-Age and Family Child Care Regulations

5

Inches of

Loose-fillmaterial

Protects to fall height

9 Shredded/recycled rubber

10 feet

9 Sand 4 feet

9 Pea gravel 5 feet

9 Wood mulch 7 feet

9 Wood chips 10 feet

7.07 Physical Facility Requirements Fall Zones (Use Zones) for Outdoor Play

Use Zone -The surface under and around a piece of equipment onto which a child falling from or exiting from the equipment would be expected to land. These areas are also designated for unrestricted circulation around the equipment. (CPSC definition)

Swing set: top view

Page 6: 1 EECs Proposed Regulations: Overview and Update A New Approach to Group, School-Age and Family Child Care Regulations

6

Background: Fall zones under swings, slides, and structures have been required since 1998 in group child care programs. Proposed regulations also required fall zones in family child care and school age programs. In response to much testimony about cost and installation concerns, this was deleted for FCC. EEC’s Board discussed this as an important safety issue.

7.07 Physical Facility Requirements Fall Zones (Use Zones) for Outdoor Play

Considerations: Playground injuries(CPSC):

83% occur to children between ages 2 and 9; 79% are caused by falls; 76% occur on public playgrounds; 23% occur on home or residential playgrounds but result in 70% of related deaths.

EEC data indicate few serious injuries in licensed FCC homes. Fall zones can be costly to install and require frequent maintenance.Technical assistance is available: CPSC Playground Safety Handbook http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/pubs/playpubs.html

Page 7: 1 EECs Proposed Regulations: Overview and Update A New Approach to Group, School-Age and Family Child Care Regulations

7

7.07 Physical Facility Requirements Fall Zones (Use Zones) for Outdoor Play

Options discussed:Don’t require; address with technical assistance (current proposal).Immediately require fall zones in all settings including family child care. Prohibit the use of playground equipment without fall zones and provide alternatives for large muscle development.Require fall zones at future date (2012); to provide family child care programs with time to comply.Use QRIS standards as an incentive (points for fall zones).Advocate for resources to offset the installation cost.Convene study group to research before requiring in regulations.

Page 8: 1 EECs Proposed Regulations: Overview and Update A New Approach to Group, School-Age and Family Child Care Regulations

8

7.07 Physical Facility Requirements Fall Zones (Use Zones) for Outdoor Play

Recommendations by the Committee for the Board:

1.Require fall zones by 2012 to give FCC programs time to retrofit existing equipment.2.Revise the regulations to require fall zones for all new equipment installed after the effective date of the regulations.3.Provide technical assistance on large muscle activities/gross motor play that do not require playground equipment. 4.Explore options for offsetting the installation costs of fall zones.

Page 9: 1 EECs Proposed Regulations: Overview and Update A New Approach to Group, School-Age and Family Child Care Regulations

9

7.09 Staff Qualifications and DevelopmentDiverse Learners

Background: Current center-based regulations require that 25% professional development hours address special needs Proposed regulations broaden this 25% to include diverse learners and to apply to family child care Public comment: concerns about availability of training EEC Board questioned if 25% was sufficient to address this broader category

Considerations: All licensed programs are required to accept application from families whose children have special needs Anecdotally, programs report more children enrolling with diverse learning needs Limited data available on current offerings/needs

July-Dec. 2008, EEC’s PD Calendar listed 48 professional development offerings related to special needs (based on review of titles and descriptions) 648 staff attended these offerings (not an unduplicated count). 183 identified themselves as family child care

PD Calendar updated to identify which courses address special needs Trainings are also available from other sources

“Children who have special physical, emotional, behavioral or linguistic needs or whose primary learning modality is visual, auditory, tactile or kinesthetic, who may require an adaptation in the environment, interaction or curriculum in order to succeed in their program.” (definition in proposed regulations)

Page 10: 1 EECs Proposed Regulations: Overview and Update A New Approach to Group, School-Age and Family Child Care Regulations

10

7.09 Staff Qualifications and DevelopmentDiverse Learners

Options discussed:Increase the proposed percentage to 33%? 50%?Require that diverse learners be addressed in all professional development counted towards the required in-service hours (no specific %).Require that 25% of professional development address diverse learners in its entirety and that all professional development must include them. Convene study group and/or research current offerings and needs before changing regulations

Page 11: 1 EECs Proposed Regulations: Overview and Update A New Approach to Group, School-Age and Family Child Care Regulations

11

7.09 Staff Qualifications and DevelopmentDiverse Learners

Recommendations by the Committee for the Board:

1.Revise the regulations to increase the percentage of required professional development that must address diverse learners from 25% to 33%.

2.Develop a policy, for consideration by the Board, stating that all required professional development must include diverse learners.

3.Research what existing professional development meets this requirement and what additional resources are needed.

4. Address this issue as part of EEC’s Workforce Development Plan.

Page 12: 1 EECs Proposed Regulations: Overview and Update A New Approach to Group, School-Age and Family Child Care Regulations

12

Regulation Review Process Timeline

Board provides input on alignment approach Dec.2005-Jan. 2006 EEC develops draft regulations Jan. 2006-March 2007 Intensive informal external review process May-August 2007 Revisions to draft August - October 2007 Board votes to send out for public comment November 2007 Public Hearings February 2008 Revisions to draft March-August 2008 Provide resources for the field Fall 2008 to Fall 2009 Board votes to promulgate in January April 2009 Technical assistance/training Spring 2009 and ongoing New regulations are promulgated (take effect) January 2010 Licensors evaluate compliance and offer resources Ongoing