Upload
victor-austen-obrien
View
218
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Evaluation of Ports of Entry Evaluation of Ports of Entry (POE) for the International (POE) for the International Border in the El Paso MPO Border in the El Paso MPO
Study AreaStudy Area
2
Existing and Proposed Ports of EntryExisting and Proposed Ports of Entry
New Tornillo-Guadalupe POE
3
Existing and Future ConditionsExisting and Future Conditions
– Current conditions Border Improvement Plan (BIP)
– Provides queuing statistics from last year Increased wait times at POEs Coordinating with CBP and other agencies to scientifically measure
queues to assist CBP operations and infrastructure needs Commercial POE facilities need more capacity
– Future Conditions Future commercial traffic forecasts a need for more capacity Existing Non-Commercial POEs a need for more capacity except for
Santa Teresa, NM and Tornillo (TX)-Guadalupe POE
4
AlternativesAlternatives
Incorporation of Intelligent Transportation Systems such as– Dedicated commuter lanes (DCL), – Free and Secure Trade lanes (FAST)– Other methodologies
• Maintain effective security• Decrease average inspection time
Utilizing 100% of inspection booths – before traffic peak hours – coordinate and extend inspection hours for commercial crossings
Develop long-range land use plan and incentive program– promote commercial land uses to the less congested port of entries (POEs) at Santa
Teresa and Tornillo- Guadalupe Bridge. Coordinate with Mexican Officials on improving access to northbound FAST lanes Develop new ports of entry
5
– ITS Implementations in the El Paso MPO Study Area Santa Teresa Port of Entry (POE) ITS project Bridge of the Americas (BOTA) – DCL addition Proposed Cesar Chavez (Yarbrough) ITS and HOV POE between Zaragoza and BOTA Zaragoza (POE) – Expand the POE facilities
– Develop a long-range land use plan Location of industrial sites by the Verde Group adjacent to the Santa Teresa POE County of El Paso –promotion of industrial sites between I-10 and State Highway 20
that are near to the proposed commercial Tornillo-Guadalupe POE
– New ports of entry Sunland Park, NM Non-commercial POE - Presidential Permit (PP) in process City of El Paso Cesar Chavez POE – Scope of work under development City of Socorro, TX Non-commercial POE– Scope of work under development Construction of new Tornillo- Guadalupe POE– by 2015
ImplementationsImplementations
6
Current Bridge StatisticsCurrent Bridge Statistics Year 2006 (Jan-June) Average Monthly Total of Passenger Vehicles for all POEs
in MPO Study Area = 1,336,716 vehicles Total number of registered vehicles using DCL for both
Zaragoza and Stanton = 18,225 as of 01/12/07 Percentage Distribution of Passenger Vehicles going through
each POE on a monthly basisPOE % Vehicles– DCL Zaragoza0.53 % since 03/06 7,073– DCL Stanton 6.78 % 90,484– Zaragoza 19.98 % 266,649– PDN 20.65 % 275,591– BOTA 52.22 % 696,919
777
8
Border Improvement Plan (BIP) Proposed Facility Layout for Border Improvement Plan (BIP) Proposed Facility Layout for Cesar Chavez POECesar Chavez POE
9
BIP Proposed Facility Layout for Cesar Chavez POEBIP Proposed Facility Layout for Cesar Chavez POE
10
BIP Proposed Facility Layout for Cesar Chavez POEBIP Proposed Facility Layout for Cesar Chavez POE
11
BIP Proposed Facility Layout for Cesar Chavez POEBIP Proposed Facility Layout for Cesar Chavez POE
12
Proposed Commuter POE Facility Layout – Proposed Commuter POE Facility Layout – splitting point funnelsplitting point funnel
-Propose a wider splitting point funnel to accommodate vehicles
-This scenario shows the accommodation of 161 DCL vehicles and 64 HOV vehicles
- Idea is to keep vehicles contained within the facility as much as possible to avoid spill over into Mexico
13
BIP Projected Commuter POE Statistics BIP Projected Commuter POE Statistics for DCL and HOV lanesfor DCL and HOV lanes
14
Future Projections for the Cesar Chavez Future Projections for the Cesar Chavez POEPOE
Estimated 2% passenger vehicle increase per year1
1. Fullerton, Thomas, M. Borderplex Economic Outlook: 2006-2008. University of
Texas at El Paso. Business Report SR06-2, El Paso, October 2006
Paso
15
The Presidential Permit process will examine all options and analysis from the BIP and beyond its scope to arrive at the preferred alternative
ConclusionsConclusions
16
Proposed Cesar Chavez POE Video
Concept to provide direct access to Cesar Chavez Highway (Source IMIP)
17
Proposed Cesar Chavez AnalysisProposed Cesar Chavez Analysis
Slides 16-33Slides 16-33
18
Estimated Number of DCL vehicles anticipated the same as for Zaragoza (starting)– 5000 Vehicles
Estimated Number of HOV vehicles (3 and above) to shift from POE to Cesar Chavez POE (monthly)– Zaragoza 0.57 X 0.27 X 266,649 = 41,037– BOTA 0.12 X 0.27 X 696,919 = 22,580– PDN 0.03 X 0.27 X 275,591 = 2,232– Total = 65,850
Total Estimated Current Number of Users– 65,850 + 5,000 = 70,850 Monthly ( about 5% of total traffic)– Daily Estimated traffic 2,362 vehicles
BIP Projected Commuter POE Statistics BIP Projected Commuter POE Statistics for DCL and HOV lanesfor DCL and HOV lanes
19
Cesar Chavez POE Queue Projections if Cesar Chavez POE Queue Projections if built in 2007built in 2007
DCL – 6 booths HOV – 3 booths
20
DCL HOV
HOV Arrival RateHOV Service RateHOV Queue – 18 vehiclesDCL Arrival RateDCL Service Rate - 7 secondsDCL Queue – 38 vehicles
HOV Max Arrival Rate – 47 vehs/15minHOV Service Rate – 30 vehs/15minsHOV Queue – 18 vehiclesDCL Max Arrival Rate – 156 vehs/15minsDCL Service Rate – 128 vehs/15minsDCL Queue – 2 vehicles
Cesar Chavez POE Queue Projections if Cesar Chavez POE Queue Projections if built in 2007built in 2007
21
Cesar Chavez POE Projections of queuing – 5 yrsCesar Chavez POE Projections of queuing – 5 yrs
DCL – 6 booths HOV – 3 booths
22
Cesar Chavez POE Projections of Queuing Cesar Chavez POE Projections of Queuing 5 yrs5 yrs
DCL HOV
HOV Arrival RateHOV Service RateHOV Queue – 18 vehiclesDCL Arrival RateDCL Service Rate - 7 secondsDCL Queue – 38 vehicles
HOV Max Arrival Rate – 51 vehs/15minsHOV Service Rate – 30 vehs/15minsHOV Queue – 19 vehiclesDCL Max Arrival Rate- 162 vehs/15minsDCL Service Rate – 128 veh/15 minsDCL Queue – 8 vehicles
23
Cesar Chavez POE Projections of Queuing Cesar Chavez POE Projections of Queuing 10 yrs10 yrs
DCL – 6 booths HOV – 3 booths
24
Cesar Chavez POE Projections of Queuing Cesar Chavez POE Projections of Queuing 10 yrs 10 yrs
DCL HOV
HOV Arrival RateHOV Service RateHOV Queue – 18 vehiclesDCL Arrival RateDCL Service Rate - 7 secondsDCL Queue – 38 vehicles
HOV Max Arrival Rate – 56 vehs/15 minsHOV Service Rate – 30 veh/15 minsHOV Queue – 23 vehiclesDCL Max Arrival Rate – 190 vehs/15 minsDCL Service Rate – 128 veh/15 minsDCL Queue – 25 vehicles
25
Cesar Chavez POE Projections of Queuing Cesar Chavez POE Projections of Queuing 15 yrs 15 yrs
DCL – 6 booths HOV – 3 booths
26
Cesar Chavez POE Projections of Queuing Cesar Chavez POE Projections of Queuing 15 yrs15 yrs
DCL HOV
HOV Arrival RateHOV Service RateHOV Queue – 18 vehiclesDCL Arrival RateDCL Service Rate - 7 secondsDCL Queue – 38 vehicles
HOV Max Arrival Rate – 60 vehs/15 minsHOV Service Rate – 30 vehs/15minsHOV Queue – 26 vehiclesDCL Max Arrival Rate – 210 vehs/15minsDCL Service Rate – 128 vehs/15minsDCL Queue – 40 vehicles
27
Cesar Chavez POE Projections of Queuing Cesar Chavez POE Projections of Queuing 30 yrs30 yrs
DCL – 6 booths HOV – 3 booths
28
Cesar Chavez POE Projections of Queuing Cesar Chavez POE Projections of Queuing
30 yrs30 yrs
DCL HOV
HOV Arrival RateHOV Service RateHOV Queue – 18 vehiclesDCL Arrival RateDCL Service Rate - 7 secondsDCL Queue – 38 vehicles
HOV Max Arrival Rate – 62 vehs/15 minsHOV Service Rate – 30 vehs/ 15 minsHOV Queue – 35 vehiclesDCL Max Arrival Rate – 283 vehs/15 minsDCL Service Rate – 128 vehs/15minsDCL Queue – 80 vehicles
29
Evaluation of Scenarios – Cesar Chavez POEEvaluation of Scenarios – Cesar Chavez POE
Stanton POE uses 2 lanes for DCL and can have queues up to 90 vehicles
30
Evaluation of Scenarios – Cesar Chavez POEEvaluation of Scenarios – Cesar Chavez POE
-Length of Option 1 = approx 1,100 feet
-Maximum Expected queue is expected to be contained near the facility
-Conclusion: bridge is too long for the maximum expected number of vehicles in queue
-The stop at the north road and arterial will create a queue that encroaches upon vehicles leaving the inspection facility
1,100 feet
31
Length of Option 2 = approx 1,200 feet
-Maximum Expected queue is expected to be contained near the facility
-Conclusion: bridge is too long for the maximum expected number of vehicles in queue
-The stop at the north road and arterial will create a queue that encroaches upon vehicles leaving the inspection facility
1,200 feet
Evaluation of Scenarios – Cesar Chavez POEEvaluation of Scenarios – Cesar Chavez POE
32
-Length of Option 3 = approximately 600 feet
-Maximum Expected queue is expected to be contained near the facility
-Conclusion: bridge is sufficiently long enough to hold the maximum expected number of vehicles in queue
-The stop at the arterial will create a queue that encroaches upon vehicles leaving the inspection facility
-Provides good access to going east and west into Border Highway and north into the lower valley
600 feet
Arterial
Evaluation of Scenarios – Cesar Chavez POEEvaluation of Scenarios – Cesar Chavez POE
33
Length of Option 4 = approximately 600 feet
-Maximum Expected queue is expected to be contained near the facility
-Conclusion: bridge is sufficiently long enough to hold the maximum expected number of vehicles in queue
- Limited access to going east on Border Highway and north into the Lower Valley
600 feet
Highway
Evaluation of Scenarios – Cesar Chavez POEEvaluation of Scenarios – Cesar Chavez POE
34
Conclusions – Cesar Chavez POEConclusions – Cesar Chavez POE
With regard to Option 3, - It can contain DCL and HOV peak hour vehicle
queuing with the construction of up to 6 DCLs and 3 HOV lanes
– The stops at the roads and arterials could potentially cause a queue of vehicles to encroach on vehicles exiting the facility
– Provides good access going east/ west into Border Highway and north into Lower Valley
35
With regard to Option 4, – It can contain DCL and HOV peak hour vehicle
queuing with the construction of up to 6 DCLs and 3 HOV lanes
– There is limited access to going east on Border Highway and north into the Lower Valley
Option 1 and 2 are too long in construction– The stops at the roads and arterials could potentially
cause a queue of vehicles to encroach on vehicles exiting the facility
Conclusions – Cesar Chavez POEConclusions – Cesar Chavez POE