Upload
lara-randolph
View
40
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Chapter 24 - Capital Investment Analysis. Objectives. 1. Explain the nature and importance of capital investment analysis. 2. Evaluate capital investment proposals, using the following methods: average rate of return, cash payback, net present value, and internal rate of return. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1. Explain the nature and importance of capital investment analysis.
2. Evaluate capital investment proposals, using the following methods: average rate of return, cash payback, net present value, and internal rate of return.
3. List and describe factors that complicate capital investment analysis.
Chapter 24 - Capital Investment AnalysisChapter 24 - Capital Investment Analysis
Objectives
Nature of Capital Investment AnalysisNature of Capital Investment AnalysisNature of Capital Investment AnalysisNature of Capital Investment Analysis
1. Management plans, evaluates, and controls investments in fixed assets.
2. Capital investments involve a long-term commitment of funds.
3. Investments must earn a reasonable rate of return.
4. The process should include a plan for encouraging and rewarding employees for submitting proposals.
Capital budgeting is the process by which management plans, evaluates, and controls long-term investments in fixed assets.
Capital budgeting is the process by which management plans, evaluates, and controls long-term investments in fixed assets.
Methods of Evaluating Methods of Evaluating Capital Investment ProposalsCapital Investment Proposals
Methods of Evaluating Methods of Evaluating Capital Investment ProposalsCapital Investment Proposals
Here’s a survey of business practices in a variety of industries. It reports the capital investment analysis methods
used by large U.S. companies.
Here’s a survey of business practices in a variety of industries. It reports the capital investment analysis methods
used by large U.S. companies.
Average rate of return
Cash payback method
Net present value method
Internal rate of return method
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
15%
53%
85%
76%
Journal of Business and Management (Winter 2002)
Easy to calculate Considers accounting income (often used to
evaluate managers)
Average Rate of Return Method
Advantages:
Ignores cash flows
Ignores the time value of money
Disadvantages:
Methods that Ignore Present ValueMethods that Ignore Present ValueMethods that Ignore Present ValueMethods that Ignore Present Value
Machine cost $500,000Expected useful life 4 yearsResidual value noneExpected total income $200,000
Assumptions:
Average Rate of Return
Estimated AverageAnnual Income
Average Investment=
Average Rate of Return MethodAverage Rate of Return MethodAverage Rate of Return MethodAverage Rate of Return Method
Average Rate of Return =
$200,000 ÷ 4 years=
($500,000 + $0) / 220%
Average annual income $ 30,000 $ 36,000Average investment $120,000 $180,000
Assumptions: Proposal A Proposal B
$30,000
$120,000= 25%
Average Rate of Return MethodAverage Rate of Return MethodAverage Rate of Return MethodAverage Rate of Return Method
Average annual income $ 30,000 $ 36,000Average investment $120,000 $180,000
Assumptions: Proposal A Proposal B
$36,000
$180,000= 20%
Average Rate of Return MethodAverage Rate of Return MethodAverage Rate of Return MethodAverage Rate of Return Method
Considers cash flows
Shows when funds are available for reinvestment
Ignores profitability (accounting income) Ignores cash flows after the payback
period
Cash Payback Method
Methods that Ignore Present ValueMethods that Ignore Present ValueMethods that Ignore Present ValueMethods that Ignore Present Value
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Cash Payback MethodCash Payback MethodCash Payback MethodCash Payback Method
Investment cost $200,000Expected useful life 8 yearsExpected annual net cash flows (equal) $40,000
Assumptions:
CashPayback Period
Total Investment
Annual NetCash Inflows
=
CashPaybackPeriod
$200,000=
$40,000= 5 years
Year 1 $ 60,000 $ 60,000Year 2 80,000 140,000Year 3 105,000 245,000Year 4 155,000 400,000Year 5 100,000 500,000Year 6 90,000 590,000
Net Cash CumulativeFlow Net Cash Flow
Cash Payback MethodCash Payback MethodCash Payback MethodCash Payback Method
If the proposed investment is $400,000, the payback period is at
the end of Year 4.
If the proposed investment is $400,000, the payback period is at
the end of Year 4.
The time value of money concept is used in many business decisions. This concept is an important consideration in capital investment analysis.
PresentValue $ ????
What is the present value of $1,000 to be received one year from today at 8% per year?
What is the present value of $1,000 to be received one year from today at 8% per year?
Present Value MethodsPresent Value MethodsPresent Value MethodsPresent Value Methods
$ 925.93 = $1,000 ÷ 1.08
How much would have to be invested on February 1, 2006 in order to receive
$1,000 on February 1, 2009 if the interest rate compounded annually is 12%?
How much would have to be invested on February 1, 2006 in order to receive
$1,000 on February 1, 2009 if the interest rate compounded annually is 12%?
Present Value MethodsPresent Value MethodsPresent Value MethodsPresent Value Methods
Refer to the partial present value table in Slide 18 to
answer the question.
Refer to the partial present value table in Slide 18 to
answer the question.
Present Value MethodsPresent Value MethodsPresent Value MethodsPresent Value Methods
$1,000, 3 years, 12%
compounded annually
Calculating Present ValuesCalculating Present ValuesCalculating Present ValuesCalculating Present Values
Present values can be determined using present value tables, mathematical formulas, a calculator or a computer.
Present Value of $1 with Compound InterestPresent Value of $1 with Compound Interest
1 0.943 0.909 0.893 0.870 0.833
2 0.890 0.826 0.797 0.756 0.694
3 0.840 0.751 0.712 0.658 0.579
4 0.792 0.683 0.636 0.572 0.482
5 0.747 0.621 0.567 0.497 0.402
6 0.705 0.564 0.507 0.432 0.335
Year 6% 10% 12% 15% 20%
$1,000 x .712 = $712$1,000 x .712 = $712
0.7120.712
Present Value of an AmountPresent Value of an AmountPresent Value of an AmountPresent Value of an Amount
If $712 is invested on February 1, 2006 at an annual rate of 12 percent, $1,000 will accumulate by February 1, 2009.
If $712 is invested on February 1, 2006 at an annual rate of 12 percent, $1,000 will accumulate by February 1, 2009.
$1,000 x .712 = $712$1,000 x .712 = $712
Present Value of an AmountPresent Value of an AmountPresent Value of an AmountPresent Value of an Amount
Feb. 1
2006 Feb. 1
2007 Feb. 1
2008 Feb. 1
2009
$712 x 1.12 $797 x 1.12 $893 x 1.12 $1,000
Present Value of an AnnuityPresent Value of an AnnuityPresent Value of an AnnuityPresent Value of an Annuity
An annuity is a series of equal net cash flows at fixed time intervals.
The present value of an annuity is the sum of the present values of each
cash flows.
An annuity is a series of equal net cash flows at fixed time intervals.
The present value of an annuity is the sum of the present values of each
cash flows.
What would be the present value of a $100 annuity for five periods at 12?
What would be the present value of a $100 annuity for five periods at 12?
Present Value of an Annuity of $1Present Value of an Annuity of $1
1 0.943 0.909 0.893 0.870 0.833
2 1.833 1.736 1.690 1.626 1.528
3 2.673 2.487 2.402 2.283 2.106
4 3.465 3.170 3.037 2.855 2.589
5 4.212 3.791 3.605 3.353 2.991
6 4.917 4.355 4.111 3.785 3.326
Year 6% 10% 12% 15% 20%
Calculating Present Values of AnnuitiesCalculating Present Values of AnnuitiesCalculating Present Values of AnnuitiesCalculating Present Values of Annuities
3.605 x $100 = $360.50
3.6053.605
Net Present Net Present Value Value
MethodMethod
Net Present Net Present Value Value
MethodMethod
The net present value method analyzes capital investment proposals by
comparing the initial cash investment with the present value of the net
cash flows.
The net present value method analyzes capital investment proposals by
comparing the initial cash investment with the present value of the net
cash flows.
Considers cash flows and the time value of money
Net Present Value MethodNet Present Value MethodNet Present Value MethodNet Present Value Method
Advantage:
Assumes that cash received can be reinvested at the rate of return
Disadvantage:
Cash Flow Present Value
At the beginning of 2006, equipment with an expected life of five years can be
purchased for $200,000. At the end of five years it is anticipated that the
equipment will have no residual value.
At the beginning of 2006, equipment with an expected life of five years can be
purchased for $200,000. At the end of five years it is anticipated that the
equipment will have no residual value.
Net Present Value MethodNet Present Value MethodNet Present Value MethodNet Present Value Method
A net cash flow of $70,000 is expected at the end of 2006. This net cash flow is expected to decline
$10,000 each year (except 2010) until the machine is retired. The firm expects a minimum rate of return
of 10%. Should the equipment be purchased?
A net cash flow of $70,000 is expected at the end of 2006. This net cash flow is expected to decline
$10,000 each year (except 2010) until the machine is retired. The firm expects a minimum rate of return
of 10%. Should the equipment be purchased?
First, we must determine which table to use… the present value of
$1 or the present value of an annuity of $1.
First, we must determine which table to use… the present value of
$1 or the present value of an annuity of $1.
Net Present Value MethodNet Present Value MethodNet Present Value MethodNet Present Value Method
Because there are multiple years of net cash flows, shouldn’t we
use the present value of an annuity of $1?
Because there are multiple years of net cash flows, shouldn’t we
use the present value of an annuity of $1?
Net Present Value MethodNet Present Value MethodNet Present Value MethodNet Present Value Method
That would be true if the net cash flows remained constant from 2006 through 2010. Note that the net cash flows are $70,000, $60,000, $50,000, $40,000,
and $40,000, respectively.
That would be true if the net cash flows remained constant from 2006 through 2010. Note that the net cash flows are $70,000, $60,000, $50,000, $40,000,
and $40,000, respectively.
Net Present Value MethodNet Present Value MethodNet Present Value MethodNet Present Value Method
So, we have to use the present value of $1 for each
of the five years.
So, we have to use the present value of $1 for each
of the five years.
$ 63,630 $70,000 x 0.909 (n = 1; i = 10%) $ 49,560 $60,000 x 0.826 (n = 2; i = 10%) $ 37,550 $50,000 x 0.751 (n = 3; i = 10%) $ 27,320 $40,000 x 0.683 (n = 4; i = 10%) $ 24,840 $40,000 x 0.621 (n = 5; i = 10%)
Jan. 1
2006 Dec. 31
2006 Dec. 31
2007 Dec. 31
2008 Dec. 31
2009 Dec. 31
2010
$<200,000> $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $40,000
Net Present Value MethodNet Present Value MethodNet Present Value MethodNet Present Value Method
$ 63,630 $ 49,560 $ 37,550 $ 27,320 $ 24,840$ 2,900
Net Present Value MethodNet Present Value MethodNet Present Value MethodNet Present Value Method
Jan. 1
2006 Dec. 31
2006 Dec. 31
2007 Dec. 31
2008 Dec. 31
2009 Dec. 31
2010
$<200,000> $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $40,000
The equipment should be purchased because the net present value is
positive.
The equipment should be purchased because the net present value is
positive.
When capital investment funds are limited and the alternative proposals
involve different amounts of investment, it is useful to prepare a ranking of the proposals using a present value index.
(a.k.a. profitability index)
When capital investment funds are limited and the alternative proposals
involve different amounts of investment, it is useful to prepare a ranking of the proposals using a present value index.
(a.k.a. profitability index)
Net Present Value MethodNet Present Value MethodNet Present Value MethodNet Present Value Method
Total present value $107,000 $86,400 $93,600Total investment 100,000 80,000 90,000Net present value $ 7,000 $ 6,400 $ 3,600
Present value index 1.07 1.08 1.04
Assumptions:Assumptions: ProposalsA B C
$107,000 ÷ $107,000 ÷ $100,000$100,000
$107,000 ÷ $107,000 ÷ $100,000$100,000
$86,400 ÷ $86,400 ÷ $80,000$80,000
$86,400 ÷ $86,400 ÷ $80,000$80,000
$93,600 ÷ $93,600 ÷ $90,000$90,000
$93,600 ÷ $93,600 ÷ $90,000$90,000
The The bestbestThe The bestbest
Net Present Value MethodNet Present Value MethodNet Present Value MethodNet Present Value Method
Considers cash flows and the time value of money
Ability to compare projects of unequal size
Advantages:
Disadvantages: Requires complex calculations
Assumes that cash can be reinvested at the internal rate of return
Internal Rate of Return MethodInternal Rate of Return MethodInternal Rate of Return MethodInternal Rate of Return Method
Internal Rate of Return MethodInternal Rate of Return MethodInternal Rate of Return MethodInternal Rate of Return Method
Assume a rate of return and calculate the present value. Modify the rate of return and calculate a new present value. Continue until the present value approximates the investment cost.
The internal rate of return method uses the net cash flows to determine the rate of return expected from the proposal. The following approaches may be used:
Trial and ErrorTrial and Error
Computer FunctionComputer Function
Use a computer function to calculate exactly the expected rate of return.
$97,360
$20,000= 4.868
Determine the table value using the present value for an annuity of $1 table.
Internal Rate of Return MethodInternal Rate of Return MethodInternal Rate of Return MethodInternal Rate of Return Method
Amount to be invested
Equal annual cash flow
Management is evaluating a proposal to acquire equipment costing $97,360. The equipment is expected to provide annual net cash flows of
$20,000 per year for seven years.
Management is evaluating a proposal to acquire equipment costing $97,360. The equipment is expected to provide annual net cash flows of
$20,000 per year for seven years.
Present Value of an Annuity of $1Present Value of an Annuity of $1Present Value of an Annuity of $1Present Value of an Annuity of $1
1 0.943 0.909 0.893 0.870
2 1.833 1.736 1.690 1.626
3 2.673 2.487 2.402 2.283
4 3.465 3.170 3.037 2.855
5 4.212 3.791 3.605 3.353
6 4.917 4.355 4.111 3.785
7 5.582 4.868 4.564 4.160
Year 6% 10% 12% 15%
4.8684.868
Internal Rate of Return MethodInternal Rate of Return MethodInternal Rate of Return MethodInternal Rate of Return Method
Find the seven year line on the table. Then, go across the 7-year line until the closest amount to 4.868 is located.
Move vertically to the top of the table to determine the interest rate
10%
Factors That Complicate Capital Factors That Complicate Capital Investment AnalysisInvestment Analysis
Factors That Complicate Capital Factors That Complicate Capital Investment AnalysisInvestment Analysis
Income tax Unequal proposal lives Lease versus capital investment Uncertainty Changes in price levels Qualitative considerations
Qualitative ConsiderationsQualitative ConsiderationsQualitative ConsiderationsQualitative Considerations
1. Improve product quality
2. Reduce defects and manufacturing cycle time
3. Increase manufacturing flexibility
4. Reduce inventories and need for inspection
5. Eliminate non-value-added activities
Improvements that increase competitiveness and quality are difficult to quantify. The following qualitative factors are important considerations.
Capital RationingCapital RationingCapital RationingCapital Rationing
1. Identify potential projects.
2. Eliminate projects that do not meet minimum cash payback or average rate of return expectations.
3. Evaluate the remaining projects, using present value methods.
4. Consider the qualitative benefits of all projects.
5. Rank the projects and allocate available funds.