Ciesielski, P. R, Kristoffersen, Y., et al., 1988Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Initial Reports, Vol. 114

1. EXPLANATORY NOTES1

Shipboard Scientific Party2

Standard procedures for both drilling operations and prelim-inary shipboard analysis of the material recovered during DeepSea Drilling Project (DSDP) and Ocean Drilling Program (ODP)drilling have been regularly amended and upgraded since drill-ing began in 1968. In this chapter, we have assembled informa-tion that will help the reader understand the basis for our pre-liminary conclusions and also help the interested investigator se-lect samples for further analysis. This information concernsonly shipboard operations and analyses described in the site re-ports in the Initial Reports, of the Leg 114 Proceedings of theOcean Drilling Program. Methods used by various investigatorsfor further shore-based analysis of Leg 114 data will be detailedin the individual scientific contributions published in the FinalReports, of this volume.

AUTHORSHIP OF SITE REPORTSAuthorship of the site reports is shared among the entire

shipboard scientific party, although the two co-chief scientistsand the staff scientist edited and rewrote part of the materialprepared by other individuals. The site chapters are organizedas follows (authors are listed in alphabetical order in parenthe-ses; no seniority is implied):

Site Data and Principal Results (Ciesielski, Kristoffersen)Background and Objectives (Ciesielski, Kristoffersen)Operations (Clement, Storms)Sedimentology (Bourrouilh, Hodell, Muller, Warnke, Wes-

tall)Basement Rocks (Bourrouilh, Hodell, Hughes, Muller, Per-

fit, Warnke, Westall)Biostratigraphy (Crux, Fenner, Katz, Ling, Nocchi, Ciesiel-

ski)Paleomagnetics (Clement, Hailwood)Inorganic Geochemistry (Froelich)Physical Properties (Mienert, Nobes)Downhole Logging (Blangy, Mwenifumbo)Seismic Stratigraphy (Kristoffersen, Ciesielski)Summary and Conclusions (Ciesielski, Kristoffersen)

Following the text of each site chapter are summary graphiclithologic and biostratigraphic logs, core descriptions ("barrelsheets"), and photographs of each core.

SURVEY AND DRILLING DATAThe survey data used for specific site selections are discussed

in each site chapter. Short surveys using a precision echo-sounderand seismic profiles were made aboard JOIDES Resolution onapproaching each site. Geophysical data collected during Leg114 are presented in the "Underway Geophysics" chapter (thisvolume).

1 Ciesielski, P. R, Kristoffersen, Y., et al., 1988. Proc. ODP, Init. Repts., 114:College Station, TX (Ocean Drilling Program).

2 Shipboard Scientific Party is as given in the list of Participants preceding thecontents.

DRILLING CHARACTERISTICSBecause water circulation down the drill hole is open, cut-

tings are lost onto the seafloor and cannot be examined. Theonly available information about stratification in uncored orunrecovered intervals, other than from seismic data or wireline-logging results, is from an examination of the behavior of thedrill string as observed and recorded on the drilling platform.Typically, the harder the layer, the slower and more difficult it isto penetrate. A number of other factors, however, determine therate of penetration, so it is not always possible to relate drillingtime directly to the hardness of the layers. Bit weight and revolu-tions per minute, recorded on the drilling recorder, also influ-ence the penetration rate.

DRILLING DEFORMATIONWhen cores are split, many show signs of significant sedi-

ment disturbance, including the downward-concave appearanceof originally horizontal bands, haphazard mixing of lumps ofdifferent lithologies (mainly at the tops of cores), and the near-fluid state of some sediments recovered from tens to hundredsof meters below the seafloor. Core deformation probably occursduring one of three different steps at which the core can sufferstresses sufficient to alter its physical characteristics: cutting, re-trieval (with accompanying changes in pressure and tempera-ture), and core handling on deck.

SHIPBOARD SCIENTIFIC PROCEDURES

Numbering of Sites, Holes, Cores, and SamplesODP drill sites are numbered consecutively from the first site

drilled by Glomar Challenger in 1968. Site numbers are slightlydifferent from hole numbers. A site number refers to one ormore holes drilled while the ship is positioned over a singleacoustic beacon. Several holes may be drilled at a single site bypulling the drill pipe above the seafloor (out of one hole), mov-ing the ship some distance from the previous hole, usually a fewtens of meters, and then drilling another hole.

For all ODP drill sites, a letter suffix distinguishes each holedrilled at the same site. For example, the first hole takes the sitenumber with suffix A, the second hole takes the site numberwith suffix B, and so forth. This procedure is different fromthat used by DSDP (Sites 1 through 624) but prevents ambiguitybetween site- and hole-number designations.

The cored interval is measured in meters below the seafloor.The depth interval of an individual core is the depth below theseafloor that the coring operation began to the depth that thecoring operation ended. Coring intervals are determined by themaximum length of a core barrel, 9.7 m. The cored intervals,however, may be shorter and may not necessarily be adjacent toeach other but may be separated by drilled intervals. In soft sed-iment, the drill string can be "washed ahead" with the core bar-rel in place but not recovering sediment by pumping water downthe pipe at high pressure to wash the sediment out of the way ofthe bit and up the space between the drill pipe and wall of thehole. The presence of thin, hard rock layers can result in "spotty"sampling of these resistant layers within the washed interval.

SHIPBOARD SCIENTIFIC PARTY

Cores taken from a hole are numbered sequentially from thetop of the hole downward. Maximum full recovery for a singlecore is 9.7 m of sediment or rock in a plastic liner (6.6-cm inter-nal diameter), plus about a 0.2-m-long sample (without a plasticliner) in a core catcher. The core catcher is a device at the bot-tom of the core barrel that prevents the core from sliding outwhen the barrel is being retrieved from the hole. The sedimentcore, which is in the plastic liner, is then cut into 1.5-m-long sec-tions that are numbered serially from the top of the sedimentcore (Fig. 1); the routine for handling hard rocks is described inthe "Basement Rocks" section (this chapter). When full recov-ery is obtained, the sections are numbered from 1 through 7, thelast section being shorter than 1.5 m. For sediments and sedi-mentary rocks, the core-catcher sample is placed below the lastsection and treated as a separate section. For igneous and meta-morphic rocks, material recovered in the core catcher is in-cluded at the bottom of the last section.

When recovery is less than 100%, whether or not the recov-ered material is contiguous, the recovered sediment is placed atthe top of the cored interval, and then 1.5-m-long sections arenumbered sequentially, starting with Section 1 at the top. Asmany sections as needed are created to accommodate the lengthof the core recovered (Fig. 1); for example, 3 m of core samplein a plastic liner will be divided into two 1.5-m-long sections.Sections are cut starting at the top of the recovered sediment,and the last section may be shorter than the normal 1.5-mlength. If, after the core has been split, fragments that are sepa-rated by a void appear to have been contiguous in situ, a note ismade in the description of the section.

Samples are designated by distance in centimeters from thetop of each section to the top and bottom of the sample intervalin that section. A full identification number for a sample con-sists of the following information: (1) leg, (2) site, (3) hole, (4)core number and type, (5) section, and (6) interval in centi-meters. For example, the sample identification number "114-

Sectionnumber

Fullrecovery

Partialrecovery

Partialrecoverywith void

Top

Sectionnumber

Core-catchersample

T?

Emptyliliner

Top

Sectionnumber

f

Top

Bottom -**Core-catcher Core-catcher

sample sample

Figure 1. Diagram showing procedure for cutting and labeling core sec-tions.

699A-2R-2, 98-100 cm" means that a sample was taken between98 and 100 cm from the top of Section 2 of rotary-drilled Core2, from the first hole drilled at Site 699 during Leg 114. A sam-ple from the core catcher of this core might be designated "114-699A-2R, CC (8-9 cm)."

The depth below the seafloor for a sample numbered, for ex-ample, "114-699A-2R-2, 8-10 cm" is the sum of the depth tothe top of the cored interval for Core 2 (in this example, 8.6 m,equivalent to the length of Core 1), plus the 1.5 m included inSection 1, plus the 8 cm below the top of Section 2. The samplein question is therefore located at 10.18 m below seafloor (rnbsf).which, in principle, is the sample subseafloor depth (however,sample requests should refer to a specific interval within a coresection rather than sub-bottom depths in meters).

All ODP core and sample identifiers indicate core type. Thefollowing abbreviations are used: R = rotary barrel; H = ad-vanced hydraulic piston core (APC); P = pressure core barrel;X = extended core barrel (XCB); B = drill-bit recovery; C =center-bit recovery; I = in-situ water sample; S = sidewall sam-ple; W = wash core recovery; N = Navidrill core; and M =miscellaneous material. Only APC, XCB, rotary, and wash coreswere drilled on ODP Leg 114.

Core HandlingAs soon as a core was retrieved on deck during Leg 114, a

sample was taken from the core catcher and given to the paleon-tological laboratory for an initial age assessment.

The core was then placed on the long horizontal rack on thecatwalk, and gas samples were taken by piercing the core linerand withdrawing gas into a vacuum-tube sampler. Voids withinthe core were sought as sites for gas sampling. Some of the gassamples were stored for shore-based study, but others were ana-lyzed immediately as part of the shipboard safety and pollution-prevention program. Next, the core was marked into sectionlengths, each section was labeled, and the core was cut into sec-tions. Interstitial-water (IW), organic geochemistry (OG), andphysical-properties (PP) whole-round samples were then taken.Each section was sealed at the top and bottom by gluing oncolor-coded plastic caps, blue to identify the top of a sectionand clear for the bottom. A red cap was placed on section endsfrom which an IW or OG sample had been taken. The caps wereattached to the liner by coating the end of the liner and the in-side rim of the end cap with acetone, and the caps were taped tothe liners.

The cores were then carried into the laboratory, where thesections were again labeled, using an engraver to mark the fulldesignation of the section. The length of core in each sectionand the core-catcher sample were measured to the nearest centi-meter; this information was logged into the shipboard core-logdata-base program.

The cores were then allowed to warm to room temperature(approximately 4 hr) before they were split. During this time,the whole-round sections were run through the Gamma-Ray At-tenuation Porosity Evaluator (GRAPE) for estimating bulk den-sity and porosity (see the following text; Boyce, 1976) and thepass-through magnetic susceptibility meter (see the followingtext). After the core temperature had equilibrated, thermal con-ductivity measurements were made immediately before the coreswere split.

Cores of relatively soft material were split lengthwise into"working" and "archive" halves. The softer cores were splitwith a wire or saw, depending on the degree of induration.Harder cores were split with a band saw or diamond saw. Asmany cores on Leg 114 were split with a wire from the top tobottom, younger material could possibly have been transporteddown the split face of each core section. Thus, one should be

EXPLANATORY NOTES

aware that the very near-surface part of the split core could becontaminated.

The working half was sampled for both shipboard and shore-based laboratory studies. Each extracted sample was logged intothe sampling computer program by location and the name ofthe investigator receiving the sample. Records of all removedsamples are kept by the Curator at ODP. The extracted sampleswere sealed in plastic vials or bags and labeled. Samples wereroutinely taken for shipboard analysis of sonic velocity by theHamilton Frame method, for water content by gravimetric anal-ysis, for percent calcium carbonate (carbonate bomb), and forother purposes. Many of these data are reported in the sitechapters.

The archive half was described visually. Smear slides weremade from samples taken from the archive half and were sup-plemented by thin sections taken from the working half. The ar-chive half was then measured using the pass-through cryogenicmagnetometer and photographed with both black-and-white andcolor film, a whole core at a time.

Both halves were then put into labeled plastic tubes, sealed,and transferred to cold-storage space aboard the drilling vessel.Leg 114 cores were transferred from the ship by refrigeratedvans to cold storage at the East Coast Repository at Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory, Palisades, New York.

CORE-DESCRIPTION FORMS ("BARRELSHEETS")

The core description forms (Fig. 2), or "barrel sheets," sum-marize the data obtained during shipboard analysis of eachcore. The following discussion explains the ODP conventionsused in compiling each part of the core description form andthe exceptions to these procedures adopted by Leg 114 scien-tists.

Core DesignationCores are designated using site, hole, and core number and

type as previously discussed (see "Numbering of Sites, Holes,Cores, and Samples" section). In addition, the cored interval isspecified in terms of meters below sea level (mbsl) and mbsf. OnLeg 114, these depths were based on the drill-pipe measure-ment, as reported by the SEDCO coring technician and theODP operations superintendent.

Age DataMicrofossil abundance, preservation, and zone assignment,

as determined by the shipboard paleontologists, appear on thecore description form under the heading "Biostratigraphy Zone/Fossil Character." The geologic age determined from the pale-ontological results appears in the "Time-Rock Unit" column.

On Leg 114, planktonic foraminifers, calcareous nannofos-sils, and diatoms provided most of the age determinations, al-though radiolarians and benthic foraminifers were also usefulage markers. Detailed information on the zonations and termsused report abundance and preservation appear in the "Biostra-tigraphy" section (this chapter).

Paleomagnetic, Physical-Property, and Chemical DataColumns are provided on the core description form to record

paleomagnetic results, location of physical-properties samples(density, porosity, velocity, and thermal conductivity), and chemi-cal data (percentage of CaCO3 determined using the carbonatebomb). Additional information on shipboard procedures forcollecting these types of data appears in the "Paleomagnetics,""Physical Properties," and "Inorganic Geochemistry" sections(this chapter).

Graphic Lithology ColumnThe lithological classification scheme presented here is repre-

sented graphically on the core description forms using the sym-bols illustrated in Figure 3. Modifications and additions madeto the graphic lithology representation scheme that were recom-mended by the JOIDES Sedimentary Petrology and PhysicalProperties Panel are discussed in the "Lithostratigraphy" sec-tion (this chapter).

Sediment and Sedimentary Rock CoreDescription Forms

Drilling DisturbanceRecovered rocks, particularly soft sediments, may be slightly

to extremely disturbed, and the conditions of disturbance mustbe indicated on the core description form. The symbols for thesix disturbance categories used for soft and firm sediments (Fig.4) are recorded in the "Drilling Disturbance" column on thecore description form. The disturbance categories are defined asfollows:

1. Slightly disturbed: bedding contacts are slightly bent.2. Moderately disturbed: bedding contacts have undergone

extreme bowing and firm sediment is fractured.3. Very disturbed: bedding is completely disturbed or ho-

mogenized by drilling, sometimes showing symmetrical diapirlikestructure.

4. Soupy: intervals are water-saturated and have lost all as-pects of original bedding.

5. Biscuited: sediment is firm and broken into chunks 5 to10 cm long.

6. Brecciated: indurated sediment is broken by the drillingprocess into angular fragments, perhaps along preexisting frac-tures.

Sedimentary Structures

The locations and types of sedimentary structures in a coreare shown by graphic symbols in the "Sedimentary Structures"column in the core description form (Fig. 2). Figure 4 gives thekey for these symbols. It should be noted, however, that it maybe extremely difficult to distinguish between natural structuresand structures created by the coring process.

ColorColors of the sediment were determined by comparison with

the Geological Society of America Rock-Color Chart (MunsellSoil Color Charts, 1971). Colors were determined immediatelyafter the cores were split and while they were still wet.

LithologyLithologies are recorded on the core description form by one

or more of the symbols shown in Figure 3. The symbols in agroup, such as CB1 or SB5, correspond to end-members of thesediment compositional range, such as nannofossil ooze or radi-olarite. For sediments that are mixtures of siliciclastic and bio-genic sediments, the symbol for the minor constituent is on theleft side of the column, the symbol for the major constituent ison the right side, and the abundances of the constituents ap-proximately equal the percentage of the width of the graphiccolumn that each symbol occupies. For example, the left 20%of the column may have a diatom ooze symbol (SB1), whereasthe right 80% may have a clay symbol (TI), indicating sedimentcomposed of 80% clay and 20% diatoms.

Smear slide, thin-section, and X-ray diffraction composi-tions, as well as carbonate and organic carbon contents together

SHIPBOARD SCIENTIFIC PARTY

SITE HOLE CORE CORED INTERVAL

tR

OC

K u

i»M

E-

1

J

<

1

[

BIOSTRAT. ZONE /

FOSSIL CHARACTER

IIN

IFE

RS

RA

M

0

(FO

SS

ILS

z

<

z

LA

RIA

NS

DIO

<CC

1-

Q

v>

MA

GN

ET

ICLE

OI

<

AL

PR

OP

E

I

ε

'RESERVATION:3 = GoodVI = Moderate3 = Poor

ABUNDANCE:<k = Abundant2 Common: = Frequent3 = Rare3 = Barren

isity

ΦT3

CCO

>

CΛ

ooα

•M

'o_OΦ

>

;TR

YE

MI!

o

^ ^

Φ

roc

oCO

o

zg

en

2

3

4

5

6

7

CC

TE

R

s

0.5-

1.0-

'-

-

—

_

-

-

I

--

—

-

---

-

-

-

—

-

GRAPHICLITHOLOGY

Φ

iZ<Λ

Ev>

σ>

o"ö

I ith

o

\cQ_CO

O)

o+->Φ

See

mer

NG

DIS

TU

IIL

LI

CCQ

CM

tu re

en

LL.

o

Ev>

>

Φ

w

MP

L

SS

PP

OG

IW

*

G

LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION

Lithologic description

^ Physical propertiesfull round sample

^ Organic geochemistrysample

Smear-slide summary (%):Section, depth (cm)M = minor lithology,D = dominant lithology

Interstitial watersample

< Smear slide

^ Headspace gassample

Figure 2. Core description form ("barrel sheet") used for describing sediments and sedimentary rocks.

EXPLANATORY NOTES

PELAGIC SEDIMENTS

Siliceous Biogenic SedimentsPELAGIC SILICEOUS BIOGENIC - SOFT

Diatom OozeDiatom - Rad or

Radiolarian Ooze Siliceous Ooze

SB1 SB2

PELAGIC SILICEOUS BIOGENIC - HARD

Porcellanite

Δ Δ Δ Δ ΔΔ Δ Δ Δ Δ

Δ Δ Δ Δ ΔΔ Δ Δ Δ Δ

Δ Δ Δ Δ ΔΔ Δ Δ Δ Δ

SB4 SB5 SB6

TRANSITIONAL BIOGENIC SILICEOUS SEDIMENTS

Siliceous Component < 50% Siliceous Component > 50%

\

TerrigenousSymbol

L I I ±

^ Siliceous Modifier Symbol '

Chert

A • A A AA A A A A

ΛVΛA

ΛAΛVSB7

Non-BiogenicSediments

Pelagic Clay

Calcareous Biogenic SedimentsPELAGIC BIOGENIC CALCAREOUS - SOFT

Nanno Foram or

Nannofossil Ooze Foraminiferal Ooze Foram - Nanno Ooze Calcareous Ooze

CB3

i } LJ \ 1 LD D D

13 CD CD CCD CD CD

D D D CCD C3 CD

C D

3 CD

3 CDC D

CB4CB1 CB2

PELAGIC BIOGENIC CALCAREOUS - FIRM

Nanno - Foram orNannofossil Chalk Foraminiferal Chalk Foram - Nanno Chalk Calcareous Chalk

I . I . I•l 1 f

I . I . II I I

•) 1 r -

CB7 CB8CB5 CB6

C A L C A ‰ O U S ^ H A R D T R A N S I T I 0 N A L BIOGENIC CALCAREOUS SEDIMENTS

Limestone Calcareous Component < 50% Calcareous Component > 50%1 r

I I

1i i

i i

CB9

1

11 \J

TerrigenousSymbol

^Calcareous Modifier Symbol

Gravel

SR1

Acid Igneous

SR5

EVAPORITES

Halite

E1

Concretions

SPECIAL ROCK TYPESConglomerate Breccia

SR3

Dolomite

Basic Igneous

SR6

Anhydrite

SR4

Metamorphics

SS

> //>

///fa

SR7

Gypsum

P Pyrite

drawn circle with symbol ( others may be designated )

Clay/Claystone

T9

TERRIGENOUS SEDIMENTS

Mud/Mudstone Shale (Fissile)Sandy Mud/Sandy Mudstone

T1

Silt/Siltstone

T5

Sandy Clay/Clayey Sand

1:1

:1:1

:1:

1:1

:1:1

:1:

:I:

I:I:

I:I

:I:

I:I:

I:I

T2

Sand/Sandstone

T6

wmT3

Silty Sand/Sandy Silt

> .v . .•. . : * . . v•• . :• . . •

T7

T4

Silty Clay/Clayey Silt

II

II

II

II

T8

VOLCANOGENIC SEDIMENTS

Volcanic Ash Volcanic Lapilli Volcanic Breccia

ADDITIONAL SYMBOLS

Zeolitic Glauconitic

Figure 3. Key to symbols used in "Graphic Lithology" column on the core description form shown in Figure 2.

SHIPBOARD SCIENTIFIC PARTY

DRILLING DISTURBANCESoft sediments

Slightly disturbed

Moderately disturbed

Highly disturbed

SEDIMENTARY STRUCTURES

Soupy

Hard sediments

Slightly fractured

Moderately fractured

Highly fragmented

Drilling breccia

ttm

MJ-

w w

X

-~-

••//

w

/ /

1itlit

®

6òδ>Φo

Primary structures

Interval over which primary sedimentary structu

Current ripples

Micro-cross-laminae (including climbing ripples)

Parallel laminae

Wavy bedding

Flaser bedding

Lenticular bedding

Slump blocks or slump folds

Load casts

Scour

Graded bedding (normal)

Graded bedding (reversed)

Convolute and contorted bedding

Water escape pipes

Mud cracks

Cross-stratification

Sharp contact

Scoured, sharp contact

Gradational contact

Imbrication

Fining-upward sequence

Coarsening-upward sequence

Bioturbation, minor (<30% surface area)

Bioturbation moderate (30%-60% surface area]

Bioturbation, strong (>60% surface area)

Discrete Zoophycos trace fossil

Secondary structuresConcretions

Compositional structures

Fossils, general (megafossils)

Shells (complete)

Shell fragments

Wood fragments

Dropstone

Figure 4. Standard symbols for drilling disturbance and sedimentary structures observed in sediments recov-ered during Leg 114. These symbols are used on the core description form (Fig. 2).

with the location by section and centimeter interval of all sam-ples, are listed below the core description. In addition, the loca-tions of the samples in the cores are indicated by an asterisk (*)in the "Samples" column on the core description forms.

BASEMENT-ROCK HANDLING AND COREDESCRIPTION FORMS

Igneous rocks were split, using a rock saw with a diamondblade, into archive and working halves. The archive halves weredescribed and the working halves were sampled aboard ship.Each piece of rock was numbered sequentially from the top ofeach core section, beginning with the number 1. Pieces were la-beled on the rounded, unsawed surface. Pieces that could be fit-

ted together before splitting were given the same number, butwere lettered consecutively downsection, as 1A, IB, IC, and soon. Spacers were placed between pieces with different numbersbut not between those with different letters and the same num-ber. In general, spacers are placed at interpreted drilling gaps(no recovery). The stratigraphic orientation is known for allpieces that are cylindrical in the liner and are greater in lengththan the diameter of the liner; on these pieces, arrows weredrawn pointing to the top of the core section. Care was takento ensure that correct stratigraphic orientation was preservedthrough every step of the sawing and labeling process.

Special description forms are used for igneous and metamor-phic rocks because igneous rock representation on standard sed-

EXPLANATORY NOTES

iment core description forms would be too compressed to pro-vide adequate information for potential sampling. Graphic rep-resentation of each 1.5-m core section is shown on these forms,along with summary hand-specimen and thin-section descrip-tions (Fig. 5).

LITHOLOGIC CLASSIFICATION OF SEDIMENTSAfter careful evaluation of existing schemes for classification

of oceanic sediments, the sedimentology group on Leg 114 de-cided to adopt a slight modification of the system proposed byDean et al. (1985). This system represents a refinement of the"official" JOIDES classification and is similar to the system de-scribed by Kaharoeddin et al. (1982) for use at the AntarcticMarine Geology Research Facility of Florida State University. Itis also similar to the system proposed by J. M. Mazzullo, A. W.Meyer, and R. Kidd (unpubl. data). Certain features of Maz-zullo et al.'s classification were adopted by Leg 114 scientists foruse with neritic sediments.

The system of Dean et al. is briefly described in the follow-ing paragraphs. A more detailed description of the classifica-tion can be found in the original publication (Dean et al., 1985).

The basic framework of the classification is the three-com-ponent system of calcareous-biogenic, siliceous-biogenic, andnonbiogenic components. Estimates of the percentages of thesemain components are based on smear slide analyses, using broadboundaries of 10%, 25%, and 50%. Assignment of a specificname follows a set of rules:

1. The main name of the sediment is determined from thecomponent (or group of components) that is >50% (e.g., sili-ceous ooze).

2. A component between 25% and 50% is a major modifierof the name (e.g., silty, diatom, etc.).

3. A component between 10% and 25% is a minor modifierof the name (i.e., "-bearing").

Steps in using the classification are as follows:

1. If the terrigenous components constitute more than 50%of the sediment, the sediment is a clay, silt, or whatever (see be-low for classification of terrigenous sediments). If biogenic com-ponents are more than 50%, the main name of the sediment isooze.

2. The sediment name is amended by the name(s) of thedominant biogenic component(s) (siliceous or calcareous) (e.g.,nannofossil ooze).

3. The major and minor modifiers precede the main namein order of increasing abundance. The least important compo-nent is the first modifier; the most abundant component nameis immediately before main name (e.g., diatom nannofossil ooze,clay-bearing diatom ooze).

Examples of three-component classifications with completenames (established following the preceding three steps) are shownin Figures 6A-6C.

IndurationThe main name of a sediment is modified to reflect indura-

tion. The following terms are used to indicate induration of bi-ogenous sediments:

Calcareous Siliceous

Soft: Ooze OozeFirm: Chalk Diatomite/radiolariteHard: Limestone Porcellanite (dull, porous)

Chert (lustrous, indurated)

Terrigenous SedimentsIf the sediment has more than 50% terrigenous components,

the main name is determined by use of a three-component (sand-silt-clay) classification system, as shown in Figure 7. This sys-tem is not the one used by Dean et al. (1985, fig. 6), but is a sim-plification following the practice of Leg 113 (see "ExplanatoryNotes" chapter; Barker, Kennett, et al., 1988), in order to facili-tate comparison of the results of Legs 113 and 114.

If terrigenous material is less than 50% of the sediment andmerits major- or minor-qualifier status, the same terminologyis employed as for biogenic sediments, except that the terms"muddy" or "mud-bearing" are used without qualifiers (i.e.,there are no "silty-muddy," "silty-mud-bearing," or similarterms).

Volcanogenic SedimentsVolcanogenic sediments, usually consisting of glass, feld-

spar, pyroxene, volcanic-lithic fragments, or secondary mineralssuch as palagonite or zeolites, are treated by the preceding rules.For instance:

10%-25% ash: volcanic ash-bearing26%-50% ash: volcanic ash (plus major name)>50%: volcanic ash

Lithified analogs are tuff-bearing, tuffaceous, and tuff.Other components are classified following the same proce-

dure. For example, modifiers for ferromanganese nodules are"ferromanganese-bearing" and "ferromanganic." For zeolites,the terms are "zeolite-bearing" and "zeolitic."

Sediment components that are present in amounts of < 10%,but are deemed to be particularly important, are accounted forin the sediment name (e.g., "organic-carbon-rich"). In all suchcases, however, the terms must be defined and the amountsquantified.

BIOSTRATIGRAPHY

Calcareous Nannofossils

PreservationEstimates of preservation are, by their nature, subjective and

imprecise. The following guidelines have been applied to thestudy of calcareous nannofossils from Leg 114.

Poor: severe overgrowth of discoasters and placoliths withsecondary calcite (assemblage biased in solution-resistantforms)

Moderate: some overgrowth and/or dissolution of placolithsand discoasters

Good: well preserved, with only minor signs of dissolutionand/or overgrowth

Sample PreparationSmear slide preparations of all samples were made with the

following procedure: a small piece of sediment is smeared ontoa glass slide with a drop of water using a flat toothpick. Mount-ing medium and a cover glass are then applied.

Biostratigraphic MethodsThe most widely used Cenozoic calcareous nannofossil zonal

schemes (Martini, 1971; Bukry, 1973, 1975) are only partiallyapplicable to the sedimentary sequences of the subantarctic SouthAtlantic. Progressive deterioration of the climate through the Ce-nozoic led to increased provincialism among the highly stenother-mal calcareous nannoplankton. These algae respond quickly tochanges in the thermal structure of the water masses. This is

SHIPBOARD SCIENTIFIC PARTY

CO

x>CDO

cm

0-

50

100

150

CDQ .

234

56789

10

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

2Str

O

C D

αα

o

CDαo

α

ccoen

"5

TS

TS

114-698A-24R-1

UNIT1: CHERT

Piece 1COLOR: Gray(N7).

UNIT 2: SPARSELY P LAG IOC LAS E(?) PHYRIC (FELDSPATHOID•PHYRIC?)BASALT

Pieces 2-33GROUNDMASS: Fine-grained Plagioclase and augite.PHENOCRYSTS: Feldspar or feldspathoid, 1-3 mm.COLOR: Greenish gray (5BG 6/1).VESICLES: Rare, 2-4 mm, some open, some filled with serpentinite and calcite.ALTERATION: Moderately altered and serpentinized alkali basalt.

SMEAR SLIDE SUMMARY (%):

COMPOSITION:

MicaAccessory minerals:

SpinelMagnetite

(opaques)

1, 146(Dominant lithology)

90

Tr

10

NOTE: Smear slide is from material scraped from side of barrel between Pieces 32 and 33.

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES:

(%)(g/enrn

1,93

12.263.10

Figure 5. Core description form used for the description of igneous rocks.

10

EXPLANATORY NOTES

volcanic ash

25 25%

75%

10%/ Ash λ l θ %

Calcareous

and sili-ceous-bearingvolcanic

ih A ash /careousλ /eous

bearing\ /bearingalcareousX /siliceousvolcanic \ / volcanic

aβh V βsh50% 50%

olcanic ash->and

siliceous-bearing

calcareousooze

Volcanic ash-lvolcanbearing

siliceouscalcareous

oozeSiliceous-bearing

calcareousooze

Siliceous

calcareous

ooze

Volcanic ashand

75%

bearingsiliceous

ooze

Calcareous

siliceous

ooze

Calcareous -bearingsiliceous

ooze

90%

Calcareous 10% 25% 50% 75% 90% Siliceous

Figure 6. Classification schemes used to name sediments recovered on Leg 114 (adapted from Dean et al.,1985).

seen dramatically in the subantarctic regions, where low diver-sity, endemic species, and poor preservation prevent recognitionof most of the biostratigraphic datums used to subdivide strataof low latitudes.

Where age-diagnostic species are present, they are often toorare to be used to define biostratigraphic events reliably. Theirstratigraphic ranges can be curtailed locally by changes of theclimate. In some instances, however, they may have longer strati-graphic ranges in these high latitudes than they do in low lati-tudes.

The aim of the present investigation is to relate paleoclimatic,paleogeographic, sedimentologic, and geochemical events to astandard time scale, using nannofossils. The problems outlinedabove dictate different methods for dating the strata in the sub-antarctic with nannofossils than those generally employed infossiliferous, low-latitude sequences. In the latter, most of thespecies used by Martini (1971) and Bukry (1973, 1975) are pres-ent. Their occurrences and co-occurrences are used to recognizezones in the sedimentary sequences penetrated. The first andlast occurrences of such species are used to define zonal bound-aries; direct correlation to magnetostratigraphy transforms suchbiostratigraphic events into a biochronologic datums. This pro-vides numeric ages for geologic events.

This method was applicable to only a limited number ofevents. Most of the ages assigned to the strata in this study are

derived by a different procedure. In the absence of Cenozoicmarker species, secondary or auxiliary biostratigraphic mark-ers, not included in the lower latitude zonal schemes, were used.Their stratigraphic ranges have been established in numerousdifferent studies, and those given in a recent summary (Perch-Nielsen, 1985) were adopted for the present investigation. Perch-Nielsen (1985) related these stratigraphic ranges to the Martini(1971) and Bukry (1973, 1975) zones. The occurrences and co-occurrences of these species in the samples analyzed allowedtheir assignment of a range of ages. These ages were expressedin terms of Martini's (1971) zones to allow precise correlationsto the geochronology and chronostratigraphy of Berggren et al.(1985a, 1985b).

A local zonation scheme developed for use in the subantarc-tic South Atlantic by Wise (1983) and Wise and Constans (1976)from examination of the nannofossils recovered by DSDP Legs36 and 71 was found to be applicable to the Oligocene sectionspenetrated. Application is restricted to the Oligocene sequencebecause of the incomplete stratigraphic record in the holes onwhich the zonation is based.

In the Cretaceous sections penetrated by Holes 699A and700B, the nannofossil zonation of Sissingh (1977) was applied.This scheme was developed in the mid- to high latitudes of thenorthern hemisphere but appears to be applicable to the Maes-trichtian sections of the subantarctic. Below the Maestrichtian,

11

SHIPBOARD SCIENTIFIC PARTY

Volcanic ash

10

2 5 % 25%

Clay-and x *

b iogen ic -bearingvolcanic

ashClay-earin

biogenicvolcanic

ash

ngclayey

volcanic as

olcanic ashand

biogenic-bearingclay

andclay-bearingogenic ooz

bearingbiogenic

clay

bearingclayey

biogenic ooze

Clay-bear ingbiogenic

oozeBiogenic-

bearing clayClayey

biogenic ooze

50% 50%

75% 75%

Clay 10% 25% 50%

Figure 6 (continued).

75% 90% Biogenic (Siliceous orcalcareousor mixed)

nannofossil abundances are low and preservation poor; thus, nozonation of these sequences was attempted.

Planktonic Foraminifers

Sample PreparationSamples for both planktonic and benthic foraminifers were

soaked in a hydrogen peroxide solution (3%) and washed througha 63-µm sieve with a Calgon solution. It was necessary for sev-eral samples to be boiled in sodium carbonate solution prior towet sieving. Samples were rinsed with methanol and dried underheat lamps.

Abundance and PreservationAfter the dried residue was spread twice on a 9.5 × 5.5 in.

metal tray, the abundance of planktonic foraminifer species wasestimated visually as follows:

Rare: <5 specimensFew: >5 specimens to 10%Common: 10% to 30%Abundant: >30%

Preservation was considered good when over 90% of thespecimens were not recrystallized and were without signs of dis-

solution, moderate when the tests were recrystallized and with-out signs of dissolution, fair when the tests were recrystallizedbut with less than 80% showing etched chambers as a result ofdissolution, and poor when most of the specimens were brokenor had dissolved chambers that could not be identified.

Biostratigraphic MethodsThere are several zonal schemes for Cenozoic southern hemi-

sphere planktonic foraminifers (Jenkins, 1985; McGowran, 1986),but none of these at present could be applied at the subantarcticSouth Atlantic sites drilled during Leg 114 because of the ab-sence or different ranges of the marker species. In fact, no zonalscheme has been established for the Cretaceous and Cenozoic ofthe South Atlantic-subantarctic province. Previous studies inthis area (Sliter, 1977; Krasheninnikov and Basov, 1983) did notapply or establish any zonal schemes in the stratigraphic intervalwithin the recognized time units. Only Tjalsma (1977) attrib-uted the Paleocene and early Eocene stratigraphic interval of theFalkland Plateau indirectly to Stainforth et al.'s (1975) zona-tion. He divided the Oligocene interval in P18-19/20 and P21on the basis of the last appearance datum (LAD) of Subbotinaangiporoides and chiloguembelinids.

The aim of the planktonic foraminifer study is to relate thestratigraphic intervals of the penetrated sequences to the stan-dard zonation by Berggren et al. (1985a), which is tied to the pa-

12

EXPLANATORY NOTES

Clay

25 25%

10%/ Clay X I0%

Calcareouand

siliceous-bearing

claySil iA /jaicar

ceous - \ / eous -bearing \ /bearing

caicareous\ / siliceousclay \ / clay

s/ ceous' bearing:alcareous

clay

Calcareous-bearingsiliceous

clay

Clay-andcalcareous-

bearingsiliceous

ooze

Clay-andsiliceous-bearing

calcareousooze

Clay-bear ingcalcareoussiliceous

ooze

Clay-bear ingsiliceous

calcareousooze

Siliceous-bearing

calcareousooze

Cal-careousooze

Siliceouscalcareous

ooze

Calcareoussiliceous

ooze

50% 50%

75 75%

Calcareous-\bearing \ s i Isiliceous \

ooze \

90%

Calcareous 10%

Figure 6 (continued).

25% 50% 75% 90% Siliceous

20% 20%

50% 50%

20% 20%

Figure 7. Classification scheme used to name terrigenous sediments.

leomagnetic record in such a way that it is possible to comparepaleoclimatic, paleogeographic, and sedimentologic events in bio-provinces of different latitudes. However, most of the markerspecies used by Berggren et al. (1985a) were of warm-water pref-erence and are absent in the areas investigated during Leg 114.Consequently, it is difficult or impossible to apply the standardzonation to high-latitude sequences without the use of second-ary or auxiliary markers and control from paleomagnetic dataor other fossil group events.

The temperate zonal scheme proposed by Jenkins (1985) hastentatively been used, but some of Jenkins' marker species areabsent or may have a different stratigraphic range in compari-son to New Zealand. The preliminary zonation adopted for theTertiary (when possible) incorporates elements of the zonationsof both Berggren et al. (1985a) and Jenkins (1985), the latter ofwhich is not calibrated to paleomagnetic data. For the Creta-ceous the zonal scheme based on planktonic foraminifer events(Caron, 1985) can be applied only to some intervals. In theother intervals, age assignments are linked to the identified nan-nofossil and paleomagnetic stratigraphies.

The Neogene has not been subdivided into zones becauseonly a few marker species of both the standard and Jenkins(1985) zonations were found. A local biozonation can be estab-lished by calibrating the planktonic foraminifer events with dia-toms and paleomagnetic data.

Onshore examination of core samples has allowed for a bet-ter correlation of the Paleogene stratigraphic intervals to the

13

SHIPBOARD SCIENTIFIC PARTY

standard zonation scheme. A few of the marker species used byBerggren et al. (1985a) have been found, together with alterna-tive species known to have their ranges within the standard Pzones in other southern hemisphere areas.

The ages assigned to the samples are related to the P zonesand to the calcareous nannofossil zonation of Martini (1971),based primarily on correlation of different latitude schemes re-ported by Bolli et al. (1985), McGowran (1986), and Pujol andSigal (1979). However, because several biozonal boundaries cannot be defined and some of the P zones are not recognized,short hiatuses cannot be detected.

Some events, common to every sequence, could be tied to theP zones by means of correlations between planktonic foramini-fers first and last occurrences and paleomagnetic data such asthe LAD of Planorotalites (lower part of PU) and first appear-ance datum (FAD) of Globigerinatheka index (upper part ofPU). A local biozonation for the Paleogene was constructedbased on the distribution of some phyletically related, generallydissolution-resistant endemic forms, such as Acarinina primi-tiva, Globigerinatheka senni, G. index, Subbotina linaperta, S.angiporoides, "Globigerina" labiacrassata, "Globigerina" bra-zieri, and "Globigerina" woodi woodi, listed in chronologic or-der from oldest to youngest.

The occurrence of tropical-type planktonic foraminifers in-dicates extratropical excursions and can be used to recognize"warm spikes" at high latitudes, which are isochronous andtherefore, correctable. The Morozovella crater Acme Zone, forinstance, has been identified at every site straddling the early tomiddle Eocene boundary. For the low-latitude planktonic fora-minifers, the term occurrence (O) has been used instead of ap-pearance (A) because their range at high latitudes, in mostcases, seems to be ecologically, rather than evolutionary, con-trolled.

Benthic Foraminifers

Sample Preparation

Foraminifer samples were soaked in a hydrogen peroxide so-lution (3%) and washed through a 63-µm sieve with a Calgonsolution. Several samples were boiled in sodium carbonate solu-tion prior to wet-sieving. Samples were rinsed with methanoland dried under heat lamps.

Biostratigraphic Methods

Relative abundances of benthic foraminifers were made fromthe greater than 149-µm size fraction. Paleobathymetric esti-mates were based on van Morkhoven et al. (1986) and Tjalsmaand Lohmann (1983).

Radiolarians

Sample Preparation

Leg 114 core-catcher samples were processed using a stan-dard method employed in the study of radiolarians, silicoflagel-lates, ebridians, and archaeomonads. A small (approximately15 g) sample was treated first with dilute HC1 (~ 10%) to dis-solve the calcium carbonate components of the sediment, fol-lowed by the addition of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to dissolveorganic matter. The entire treatment was made on a hot plate forabout 1 hr to accelerate these chemical reactions. After decanta-tions using deionized water were repeated two or three times, theresidues were sieved through 63-µm screen. One strewn slide wasmade from each fraction, with a 22 × 40 mm cover slip andCanada balsam as mounting medium.

Abundance and Preservation

By systematically traversing the entire smear slide of eachfraction separately with a mechanical stage, the relative abun-dances of radiolarians and silicoflagellates plus ebridians in asample were ranked as follows:

Rare: 1-10 specimensFew: 11-20 specimensCommon: 21-50 specimensAbundant: over 51 specimens

For the relative abundance of an individual taxon within anassemblage, the following ranking was used:

Rare: l%-5% of the populationFew: 6%-10% of the populationCommon: l l%-25% of the populationAbundant: over 26% of the population

Upon the complete examination of a respective smear slide,the state of microfossil preservation of the sample was expressedas follows:

Poor: noticeable number of fragments or broken specimensin the slide

Moderate: some fragments or incomplete specimensGood: most of the specimens are complete

Biostratigraphic Methods

The zonal schemes of Hays and Opdyke (1967) from theAntarctic, Chen (1975) from Leg 28 of the Pacific sector ofAntarctic, and biostratigraphic datums of Weaver (1983) fromLeg 71 in the subantarctic Atlantic were consulted as the mainreferences for analysis of Leg 114 Neogene radiolarians. A warm-water assemblage of Sanfilippo et al.'s (1985) low-latitude zona-tion was used for part of the upper Miocene section of Site 704and part of the Eocene section of Site 698. No zonation thatwas applicable to the entire subantarctic region was available atthe time of the cruise for the Paleogene and Cretaceous sec-tions.

In the case of the silicoflagellates, their biostratigraphic oc-currence was compared with the zonations of Busen and Wise(1977) from Leg 36, Shaw and Ciesielski (1983) from Leg 71 ofthe subantarctic Atlantic, and Ciesielski (1975) from Leg 28 ofthe Pacific sector of the Antarctic.

As for both ebridians and archaeomonads, because no bio-stratigraphic zonation exists for the area, the occurrence of taxawas referred to publications of Ling (1973) from the North Pa-cific and of Perch-Nielsen (1975) from Leg 29 of the Pacific sec-tor of the Antarctic.

Diatoms

Sample Preparation

Smear slides and slides of the HC1" and H2O2 insoluble resi-dues were analyzed during Leg 114 for their diatom abundancesand species. In intervals for which rare large species have beendeclared stratigraphic marker species, as for example near theEocene/Oligocene boundary {Rylandsia inaequiradiatá), the> 63-µm fraction of the HC1' and H2O2 insoluble residues wasadditionally examined.

Hyrax was used as a mounting medium. The slides were ex-amined at magnifications of 1000 × and 400 × .

14

EXPLANATORY NOTES

Abundance and Preservation

Abundances of species in the diatom assemblages were re-corded using the following categories:

Single: (<1%)Rare: (>1%)Few: (>5%)Common: (>20%)Abundant: (>50%)

Estimates of diatom preservation for this shipboard analysiscan only be very rough and subjective using the abundance ofdissolution-resistant species within the assemblages and the de-gree of fragmentation of the valves. A more precise and moreobjective classification might be achieved during the shore-basedlaboratory studies.

Biostratigraphic Methods

Two quite different diatom zonations have been proposedwithin the past 4 yr for the Oligocene and Eocene (Gombos andCiesielski, 1982; Fenner, 1984).

For the Neogene of the subantarctic region a diatom zona-tion was introduced by McCollum (1975). This zonation wasmodified by Weaver and Gombos (1981) and Ciesielski (1983).For the upper Neogene many datums have been correlatedagainst the paleomagnetic record. Following is a list of the da-tums generally found in the subantarctic region and their abso-lute age estimates by comparison with the paleomagnetic stra-tigraphy in the same holes. These are thought to be useful forplotting the age-depth curves for each site. The ages of the da-tums are taken from McCollum (1975), Burckle et al. (1978),Weaver and Gombos (1981), and Ciesielski (1983). For the earlyMiocene paleomagnetic control is missing, and the ages givenwere obtained by extrapolation (Barron, 1985).

LAD Hemidiscus karstenii 0.19 m.y.LAD Actinocyclus ingens 0.62 m.y.FAD Coscinodiscus elliptipora 1.5 m.y.LAD Rhizosolenia barboi 1.6 m.y.LAD Coscinodiscus kolbei 1.9 m.y.LAD Coscinodiscus vulnificus 2.2 m.y.LAD Cosmiodiscus insignis 2.5 m.y.LAD Nitzschia weaveri 2.64 m.y.LAD Nitzschia interfrigidaria 2.8 m.y.FAD Coscinodiscus vulnificus 3.14 m.y.FAD Nitzschia weaveri 3.88 m.y.FAD Nitzschia interfrigidaria 4.02 m.y.FAD Nitzschia angulata 4.2 m.y.LAD Denticulopsis hustedtii 4.5 m.y.LAD Denticulopsis lauta 8.5-8.7 m.y.LAD Denticulopsis dimorpha 8.7 m.y.LAD Nitzschia denticuloides 10.5-11.2 m.y.FAD Denticulopsis dimorpha ~ 12.35 m.y.LAD Nitzschia grossepunctata 14-14.5 m.y.LAD Coscinodiscus rhombicus —18.5 m.y.LAD Bogorovia veniamini —19.5 m.y.LAD Rocella gelida -21.5 m.y.

The applicability of the preceding zonal schemes and thecorrectness of the ages of the datums will be further tested bypost-cruise studies. It is hoped that Leg 114 will provide new da-tums calibrated by the paleomagnetic time scale through the Ne-ogene and Paleogene.

INORGANIC GEOCHEMISTRY

Pore WatersInterstitial-water samples were collected routinely and ana-

lyzed aboard ship for pH, alkalinity, calcium, magnesium, sul-

fate, silica, fluoride, salinity, and chloride. Splits of all sampleswere preserved for shore-based determinations of potassium,lithium, strontium, strontium isotopes, and germanium. At-tempts were made to measure potassium aboard ship withoutsuccess. All procedures follow the methods given in Gieskes andPeretsman (1986) unless stated otherwise in this chapter or theindividual site chapters (this volume).

A Metrohm 605 pH-meter was used to measure pH immedi-ately in conjunction with the alkalinity measurements. Eachsample was then titrated with 0.1 N HC1 and the end point cal-culated from a Gran plot. Alkalinities were standardized againstIAPSO (International Association of Physical Science Organi-zations) standard seawater.

Salinity was determined from refractive indices measured withan AO Scientific Instruments hand-held optical refractometerand reported in per mil (g/kg) total dissolved salts. Sulfate con-centrations were measured on highly diluted aliquots of eachsample with a Dionex 2120i Ion Chromatograph. Standardswere prepared by dilution of IAPSO standard seawater.

Chloride was determined by titration with silver nitrate to apotassium chromate end point. Standardization was againstIAPSO.

Calcium was determined by a modification of the EGTA ti-tration using GHA as an indicator. The indicator is extractedinto butanol near the end point. A titration for total divalents isperformed with EDTA to an Eriochrome Black-T end point.Both methods are standardized using IAPSO, and the calcula-tions for calcium and magnesium were performed as suggestedin Gieskes and Peretsman ("Corrected Ca and Mg"; 1986).

Dissolved silica was determined by a modification of the pro-cedure used by P. Froelich. The detailed procedure, patternedafter that used by ODP, is appended to this chapter.

Fluoride was determined by fluoride ion-specific combina-tion electrode (Orion model #96-09) by the method of Froelichet al. (1983); 0.5 mL of sample was mixed with 0.5 mL TISABIV and allowed to equilibrate for 15 min before reading. Cali-bration was against a series of fluoride-spiked IAPSO solu-tions. The slope of the response was perfectly Nernstian andwas rechecked thoroughly only at the beginning of the leg andagain at the end. Drift was compensated for by maintaining theelectrode in a large volume of IAPSO water plus TISAB andadjusting the (EMF)0 accordingly.

Several tests were performed to check for artifacts of thetemperature of squeezing. These are explained in detail in eachsite report.

ORGANIC GEOCHEMISTRY AND SEDIMENTCARBONATE CONTENTS

The following organic-geochemical measurements were per-formed during Leg 114:

Total organic carbon (TOC) and inorganic carbon (carbon-ate; IC) were determined with a Coulometrics Carbon Analyzerby difference on combustion and by direct measurement of CO2

liberated upon acidification. TOC consists of all organic carbonand inorganic carbon liberated to CO2 during heating in a pureoxygen atmosphere. CO2 is then measured by coulometry. ICwas determined by reacting samples with acid, with the CO2

again measured by coulometry. Percent calcium carbonate wascalculated from %IC. Percent organic carbon was taken as thedifference between TOC and IC. This procedure is not capableof accurately detecting organic carbon in samples containingless than 0.1% Corg.

No Rock-Eval measurements were made. Headspace deter-minations of volatile hydrocarbon gases were made routinely onalmost all cores. Even though no values in excess of backgroundlevels were encountered during the leg, the data are reported forcompleteness.

15

SHIPBOARD SCIENTIFIC PARTY

Determination of Dissolved Silica in Leg 114 PoreWaters: Modifications to Standard ODP ProceduresWe adopted several modifications to standard ODP tech-

niques for the determination of dissolved silica in pore waters.These changes result in several minor methodological improve-ments: (1) the shelf stability of the molybdate reagent is en-hanced, (2) preparation of the working solution reagents is sim-plified, (3) the necessity for salinity matching (or corrections)between standards (in deionized water) and samples (seawater)is eliminated, and (4) precision and accuracy of the procedureare improved by ensuring that the sample is added to the molyb-date, rather than vice versa.

The following modifications refer to the dissolved silica pro-cedure reported by Gieskes and Peretsman (1986; p. 37-40).This entire section on silica is reproduced here with the Leg 114modifications.

Introduction

Determination of silica in pore waters of marine sedimentsdepends upon (1) the production of a silicomolybdate complexand (2) the reduction of this complex to give a blue color. Themodified method is adapted from the work of Strickland (1952),Mullin and Riley (1955), Strickland and Parsons (1968), Parsonset al. (1984), and Fanning and Pilson (1973), plus the results ofwork in P. Froelich's lab.

Stock Reagents

All reagents are prepared with deionized, silica-free water.

1. Molybdate stock reagent: dissolve 16.0 g ammonium mo-lybdate— (NH4)6Mo7O24:4H2O—(preferably fine white crystal-line) in about 700 mL of deionized water using a 1000-mL volu-metric flask. After it has completely dissolved, dilute to 1000mL with deionized water. Store in a clear polyethylene bottleout of light, but do not refrigerate. Discard if a white precipitatedevelops in the bottom of the bottle or if the solution turnsfaintly bluish.

2. Stock HC1 reagent: measure 48 mL of concentrated HC1(12 N) into a graduated cylinder. Pour about 800 mL of deion-ized water into a 1-L volumetric flask, and add the HC1. Allowto cool and make to 1 L. Store in a polyethylene bottle. Stableindefinitely.

NOTE: Unacidified molybdate is very stable and will notprecipitate from solution for many months.

3. Stock metol-sulfite solution: dissolve 6.0 g anhydrous so-dium sulfite (Na2SO3) in about 300 mL of deionized water in a500-mL volumetric flask. Add 10 g metol (p-methylaminophenolsulfate), and then add deionized water to make to 500 mL.When the metol has dissolved, filter the solution through a No.1 Whatman filter paper into a clean, dark glass bottle with aglass-stoppered top. Store in the refrigerator. This solution dete-riorates rapidly on contact with air and must be maintained air-tight when not in use. It is normally prepared fresh at least oncea month.

4. Stock oxalic acid solution: dissolve 60 g of analytical re-agent quality oxalic acid dihydrate (COOH2:2H2O) in 1000 mLdeionized water, and store in a polyethylene bottle. The solutionwill remain stable indefinitely.

5. Stock sulfuric acid reagent: slowly pour 300 mL of con-centrated, analytical reagent quality sulfuric acid into about 500mL of deionized water in a 1-L volumetric flask. Cool to roomtemperature, make to 1 L, and store in a polyethylene bottle.The solution will remain stable indefinitely.

Working Solutions

Working solutions are prepared immediately before use.

1. Molybdate working solution: mix equal parts of dilutestock HC1 reagent and molybdate stock reagent. This solution isstable for 6-12 hr. Store in a polyethylene bottle.

2. Reducing working solution: mix equal volumes of metol-sulfite stock reagent, oxalic acid stock reagent, and sulfuric acidstock reagent, adding the sulfuric acid last. This solution is sta-ble for 4-6 hr. Do not store; prepare for immediate use. The so-lution must be allowed to come to room temperature before use(20 min).

Synthetic SeawaterDissolve 25 g sodium chloride (NaCl) and 8 g magnesium

sulfate heptahydrate (MgSO4:7H2O) in 1 L of deionized waterand store in a polyethylene bottle. The silica content of this so-lution should not exceed 1-2 µm/L.

Standards1. Primary silicate standard: sodium fluorosilicate. Place a

small quantity of Na2SiF6 in an open plastic vial in a vacuumdesiccator overnight to remove excess water. Do not heat orfuse.

Dissolve 0.9403 g Na2SiF6 in deionized water in a 1-L volu-metric flask. Dissolution is slow and cannot be rushed, so allowat least 30 min. Use low-conductivity water. The concentrationof this standard is 5000 µM. Store in two 500-mL polyethylenebottles. This standard is stable for 6-12 months. It should bekept out of light but never refrigerated.

2. Secondary standards: working standards are prepared fromthe primary standard by diluting it with synthetic seawater. Whenmaking dilutions, use synthetic seawater and store in polyethyl-ene containers. These standards are stable for several weeks. Us-ing a 50-mL volumetric flask, add the primary standard andthen bring to 50 mL with synthetic seawater so that the concen-tration of the zero standard (µM) is 100 times the volume (mL)of primary standard (e.g., 2 mL of primary standard would pro-duce 200 µM of zero standard, 4 mL of primary standard wouldproduce 400 µM of zero standard, and so on). The highest stan-dard should not exceed 2000 µM.

NOTE: These standards do not have the same salinities.However, in the following procedure, samples and standards areall diluted by 20 fold; thus, all standards, blanks, and samplesend up with salinities between 1 and 2 per mil. This small differ-ence in salinity causes a negligible salt error.

Procedure1. Have all reagents prepared. Label 5- or 10-mL plastic vi-

als and caps. Add to the vials accurately in the following order(parenthetical values are for the 5-mL vials):

2.375 mL (1.900 mL) deionized water1.000 mL (0.800 mL) molybdate working solution, swirl to

mix0.125 mL (0.100 mL) of sample standard or blank, swirl to

mix.Start the timer. After exactly 20 min (± 30 s), add 1.500 mL

(1.200 mL) of the reducing working solution. Swirl to mix; donot shake. Cap the vials.

2. After 12 hr, but before 24 hr, have elapsed read the ab-sorbance in 1-cm cells in a spectrophotometer peaked at 812mm.

NOTE: Always run several blanks. Blanks are always com-posed of the same batch of deionized water used to do the dilu-tions.

Always run the zero standard, which is not the same as theblanks. The zero standard is included in the calibration curve.The reagent blank absorbance is subtracted from the sample ab-sorbance before multiplying by the calibration factor.

16

EXPLANATORY NOTES

Do not add molybdate to the sample, but add the sample tothe molybdate (or to the diluted molybdate).

There is no temperature effect provided all solutions are atroom temperature.

Timing is critical. In batch mode with a 20-min limit for thefirst reaction, one person can react about 40 vials at a rate ofone every 30 s.

PALEOMAGNETICSThe magnetic experiments made in the shipboard paleomag-

netic laboratory can be subdivided into three complementaryparts:

1. Measurement of the natural remanent magnetization(NRM), carried out on split-core sections at 5-cm intervals usingthe three-axis pass-through cryogenic magnetometer. Thesemeasurements provided the values of declination, inclination,and magnetization intensity for the measured intervals.

2. Progressive demagnetization of pilot samples in ac fieldsup to 100 mT to remove secondary components of magnetiza-tion. The pilot samples were measured with the Molspin spinnermagnetometer, and the appropriate ac peak field value for de-magnetization was determined from inspection of magnetiza-tion intensity and vector demagnetization plots. Samples werethen demagnetized routinely at the optimum ac peak field valueand measured using a special holder placed on the core handlerof the cryogenic magnetometer (eight samples were measured inone pass through the sensing region) or using the Molspin spin-ner magnetometer.

3. Low-field magnetic susceptibility measurements using theBartington whole-core and discrete sample sensors. Whole-coremeasurements were made at 5-cm intervals at the same strati-graphic levels used for the split-core NRM measurements. Themagnetic susceptibility provides an indication of downhole vari-ations in the concentration of magnetic material.

MagnetostratigraphyTime scales are syntheses of three independently varying as-

pects: correlation, calibration, and terminology. We have cho-sen the time scale of Berggren et al. (1985a, 1985b) as our work-ing model as it is the most complete synthesis available. The cal-ibration of the Berggren et al. (1985a, 1985b) time scale is basedon an interpretation of radiometric dates tied into the magneticpolarity pattern and as such, provides reasonable estimates ofabsolute ages of biostratigraphic events. The accuracy of thedates is probably about 10%, whereas the precision of correla-tion is much better.

The terminology of the magnetic time scale has experienceddramatic changes and is still in a state of flux. The first mag-netic time scale, derived from a worldwide distribution of ba-salts, was divided into "epochs" (Cox et al., 1963), later namedBrunhes, Matuyama, and Gauss (Cox et al., 1964). Hays andOpdyke (1967) extended the epoch system, defining new timeunits based on the magnetostratigraphy of deep-sea sediments.The magnetic epochs were correlated to the magnetic anomalypattern, first used by Vine and Matthews (1963) as key evidencefor the process of seafloor spreading and then by later workers(e.g., Hays and Opdyke, 1967; Ryan et al., 1974). Because theterm epoch has a previously defined connotation in stratigra-phy, the Subcommission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature recom-mended that magnetic epochs be referred to as "chrons" (Hed-berg et al., 1979).

Unfortunately, the long-accepted correlation of Chron 9 toanomaly 5, proposed initially by Ryan et al. (1974), is now con-sidered to be in error (Miller et al., 1985; Berggren et al., 1985a,1985b). The preferred correlation is now Chron 11 to anomaly 5.Thus, the literature faces the danger of ambiguity from the use of

Miocene chron names. Following LaBrecque et al. (1983), whoproposed an anomaly-based chron terminology for the Paleo-gene, Berggren et al. (1985b) recommend the adoption of thechron structure proposed by Cox (1982) but with the addition ofa prefix letter "C." Although in their figure 6 (Neogene timescale) they use the "new-old" terminology, we will use thatwhich is recommended in the text. By adopting an entirely new,anomaly-based chron system, we hope to simplify our magneto-stratigraphic terminology.

There is a discrepancy within Berggren et al. (1985a) as tothe age assigned to the early/late Oligocene boundary. Berggrenet al. (1985a) indicate an age of 30.0 Ma in figure 5, whereas anage of 30.6 Ma is indicated in the text. We adhere to an age of30.0 Ma for the early/late Oligocene boundary.

PHYSICAL PROPERTIESPhysical-property measurements were made on whole cores

and on discrete core samples in order to determine the relation-ships between the various sediment facies recovered on Leg 114.

The Leg 114 shipboard program for physical-property sam-pling included the following measurements:

GRAPEThe Gamma Ray Attenuation Porosity Evaluator (GRAPE)

was used routinely to log the density variations in whole-coresections. The standard procedures used for calibration are de-scribed in Boyce (1976). Because of grain density variations, po-rosity cannot be reliably determined from the density measure-ments, and because of variable drilling disturbance downcore,the absolute density values should be used for qualitative pur-poses only.

The GRAPE is best used to show relative, rather than abso-lute, density changes along the core for correlation with litho-logic changes. This is illustrated by the raw GRAPE data pre-sented in Figure 8 for Cores 114-701C-4H and 114-701C-49X.

Core 114-701C-4H showed no apparent signs of disturbanceand filled the liner completely. However, the split core showedsome signs of disturbance, especially in Section 114-701C-4H-6(32.8-34.3 mbsf) and the upper portion of Section 114-701C-4H-1 (25.3-26.8 mbsf) (see core photograph following "Site701" chapter, this volume). The GRAPE record is less coherentin these sections, and GRAPE density is slightly low. The lower60 cm of Section 114-701C-4H-6 (33.7-34.3 mbsf) showed signsof flow, and the GRAPE record is flat and featureless for thatsegment. The sediments consist mostly of mud- and ash-bearingdiatom ooze. Certain discrete ash layers are apparent in theGRAPE record as well, at 60-65 cm (27.4-27.45 mbsf), 70-80cm (27.5-27.6 mbsf), and 130-150 cm (28.1-28.3 mbsf) of Sec-tion 114-701C-4H-2. These ash layers can be correlated to ashlayers in adjacent holes. Thus, the GRAPE data can be used forcross-hole lithologic correlation.

Core 114-701C-49X, on the other hand, showed outwardsigns of some biscuiting, did not fill the liner, and would notnormally have been processed using the GRAPE. However, thedisturbance in Core 114-701C-49X was uniform and apparentlyoccurred in place. Despite the disturbance, definite lithologicchanges that are readily apparent in the core show up quite no-ticeably in the GRAPE record. For example, the changes in themean GRAPE density level at 95 cm in Section 114-701C-49X-3(456.75 mbsf) and at 135 cm in Section 114-701C-49X-2 (455.65mbsf) correlate with changes in the lithology. The "staining" at40 cm (457.7 mbsf) and 59 cm (457.89 mbsf) in Section 114-701C-49X-4 correlates with an excursion in the GRAPE densityin the 40-60-cm interval. A similar zone occurs in Section 114-701C-49X-5, in the GRAPE interval from 60-90 cm (459.4-457.7 mbsf) This example illustrates the sensitivity of theGRAPE density to lithologic variations.

17

SHIPBOARD SCIENTIFIC PARTY

26 -

28 -

.Q

E30 -

Φ

Q

32 -

34 -

1 1

1 1

1 1

j , ' ; '

•' •l

1

Is:!

1

'. ii

1

• • ! '•i ' ' " . '

'i

L_

! |

. . • .

i ;•

J |

1

1

I 1

"I

11

1 1

1

452

4 5 4 -

4 5 6 -

4 5 8 -

460 -

4621.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.0 1.2

GRAPE density (g/cm3)

Figure 8. Plots of density measured using the GRAPE from Cores 114-701C-4H and 114-701C-49X.

1.4 1.6GRAPE density (g/cm3)

/MVave Logger

The .P-wave logger (PWL) is a compressional- (P-) wave whole-core logging tool operated in conjunction with the GRAPE. Theraw data were stored on diskettes and then transferred via aDEC PRO-350 personal computer to the VAX. Typical sam-pling intervals are 2 mm. The system and procedure are detailedin the Initial Reports of the Proceedings of Leg 108 (Ruddiman,Sarnthein, et al., 1988). As with the GRAPE system, the PWLvelocities are best used as indicators of lithologic change and forcross-hole correlation. The absolute velocities tend to be 20 to100 m/s lower than P-wave velocities obtained from HamiltonFrame measurements. This discrepancy might be due to a highercontent of gas within the liner; the gas is released upon splittingof liner. PWL data recovery was good in sediments recoveredwith the APC technique because the sediments completely filledthe liner. Diminished data recovery for the PWL (see, for exam-ple, Fig. 19, "Site 703" chapter, this volume) occurs in XCBcores, where biscuiting of sediments and unfilled liners lead tosevere disturbance of measurements. The GRAPE and PWL arebest used together as qualitative lithologic correlation tools.

Hamilton Frame Velocity

Compressional-wave velocity measurements were also madeon split cores within the liner and on discrete, indurated sampleswithout the liner. The calibrating and operating procedure wasconducted in a manner similar to that described in Boyce (1976).No correction factor was applied to the velocities; the calibra-tion velocities agreed with accepted values within the errors esti-mated for the procedure, ± 50 m/s, after removal of time delays

caused by the liner, if present, and the cable. Tests indicated thatmeasurements were generally repeatable to within ±20 m/s,and in one case to within ±5 m/s (Samples 114-703A-40X-3,88-90 cm, and 114-703A-40X-3, 90-92 cm).

Index Properties

Index properties include the gravimetric parameters of po-rosity, water content, bulk density (both wet and dry), and graindensity. Samples of 5 to 10 cm3 in precalibrated aluminum con-tainers were taken routinely from each section of the freshlysplit cores from the first hole of each site and from every othersection in the subsequent holes for cross-hole correlation. Wetand dry weights were determined aboard ship using a Scitechelectronic balance to a precision of ± 0.01 g, repeatable to within± 0.04 g. Sample volumes were determined for both wet and drysamples using the Penta Pycnometer to a precision of I0'4 cm3,repeatable to within 0.05 cm3. The samples were oven dried at100°C for 24 hr. The index properties, including porosity, werethen computed from the weights and volumes as outlined byBoyce (1976). For Site 701 and subsequent sites, the porositywas computed using the equation given by Hamilton (1971).Samples taken for other purposes will also be analyzed for wa-ter content, and the data sets will be merged.

Water content is the wet water content, with a maximumvalue of 100%. Thus, we have a logical pair composed of theporosity and the water content, each of which expresses thefluid fraction as a percent of the total volume, in the case of po-rosity, or the total weight, in the case of water content. The drywater content, on the other hand, expresses the fluid weight as a

18

EXPLANATORY NOTES

percent of the dry weight, and should logically be paired withthe void ratio that expresses the fluid volume as a fraction of thedry volume.

Vane Shear Measurements

Vane-shear-strength measurements were made using the hand-held Torvane apparatus for Site 698. Measurements for subse-quent Sites 699 through 704 were made using the motorizedvane shear system using a procedure similar to that outlined byBoyce (1977).

Thermal Conductivity

Needle-probe measurements of thermal conductivity (VonHerzen and Maxwell, 1959) were made at least once per coreand more frequently, if possible, on whole-core sections. Mea-surements were controlled by the Thermcon unit. Cores were al-lowed to equilibrate for at least 3 hr in the core laboratory. Mea-surement time was 4 min. Acceptable results were achieved fromthe calibration runs, which were performed when possible. Ther-mal conductivity values are expressed in standard S1 units ofwatts/meter/kelvin (W/m/K).

DOWNHOLE MEASUREMENTS

Downhole logging measurements determine directly changesin in-situ physical and chemical properties of the formation alongthe length of the borehole. Three different Schlumberger log-ging tool strings were available on Leg 114: the seismic-strati-graphic combination (sonic velocity, resistivity, gamma-ray, andcaliper; SDT/DIPH/GR/CALI), the geochemical combination(induced gamma-ray spectroscopy, aluminum clay tool, and natu-ral gamma-ray spectrometry; GST/ACT/NGT), and the litho-porosity combination (lithodensity, neutron porosity, naturalgamma-ray spectrometry, and caliper; LDT/CNL/NGT/CALI). Not all of the three tool strings were used at each of thethree sites logged. A detailed description of the physical princi-ples and properties of these parameters are given in a number ofpublications (e.g., Schlumberger, 1972; Lamont-Doherty Bore-hole Research, 1985; Serra, 1984). The following is a summarydescription of the parameters measured.

Sonic

The Schlumberger borehole-compensated (BHC) sonic toolused on Leg 114 is a dual-transmitter, dual-receiver short-spac-ing tool providing measurements of interval traveltimes and fullwaveform recordings at 3- and 5-ft (0.91- and 1.52-m) spacingsfrom the transmitter. The transmitter/receiver pairs are geome-trically arranged to compensate for tool tilt and borehole sizevariations. The full waveform train is recorded at each receiverand the P-wave arrival is then detected by a threshold/expectedarrival time algorithm. An interval transit time is calculated forthe difference in arrival time between the two receivers, 2 ft(0.61 m) apart. One automatic compressional-wave arrival pickis recorded. Compressional-wave velocities are computed frominterval traveltime and constitute measurements of the in-situvelocities. The full waveform data has not yet been analyzed.

Natural Gamma Ray

Two natural gamma-ray logs are usually recorded; the natu-ral gamma spectrometry (NGT) and gamma-ray (GR) logs. TheGR log is a total count gamma-ray log that monitors the overallamount of natural gamma radiation emitted from the three ma-jor radioactive elements that commonly occur in the formation:potassium (^K), uranium (U decay series), and thorium (Th de-cay series). The NGT tool uses gamma spectrometry techniquefor quantitative determination of potassium, uranium, and tho-rium in formations encountered in a borehole. Four logs are ac-quired with this tool: the total count (spectral) gamma-ray (SGR,

same as the GR log) log that monitors the total radioactivityfrom the three radioactive elements, the potassium log (wt% K),the uranium log (equivalent uranium in ppm), and the thoriumlog (equivalent thorium in ppm). Concentrations of these radio-active elements are characteristic of specific environments, andtheir recognition can contribute significantly to reconstructionof depositional environment. For instance, uranium concentra-tions in carbonates may indicate horizons enriched in phos-phates and/or organic material. Reducing environments, whichfavor uranium enrichment, are often associated with calm waterconditions. Uranium also tends to accumulate in faults or frac-tures; thus, uranium concentration can indicate fracture zonesor calm depositional environment conditions. The main appli-cation of the NGT logs is lithologic identification. Thorium andpotassium concentrations and their ratios can indicate the pres-ence of micaceous clay minerals, which can provide an estimateof the clay content in carbonate sediments. Th and K logs mayalso may be used in determining the type of clays mineralspresent in the formation.

Resistivity

Resistivity tools used on Leg 114 were a new, digital phasor,dual induction (DIPH) tool and an analog dual induction (DIL)tool. The DIPH is essentially an improvement on the DIL; itmeasures higher resistivities than those normally recorded bythe DIL and has better borehole compensation. Both the DIPHand the DIL provide three resistivity logs, each with a differentdepth of investigation. The spherically focused log (SFL) has ashallow depth of penetration into the formation (10-13 cm), themedium induction log (IMPH or ILM) penetrates about 60-120cm, and the deep induction log (IDPH or ILD) has a depth ofpenetration between 3 and 3.6 m. Resistivity variations withincarbonate sediments are mainly a function of temperature, po-rosity, and salinity of the pore fluids because the conductingmedium is mainly pore water. The presence of clay minerals,however, decreases the resistivity of the formation. Because re-sistivities primarily reflect porosity changes in the formation,apparent porosities can be determined from the resistivity logsusing Archie's (1942) law. The porosities are only approximatebecause variations in borehole diameter and clay content affectthe apparent resistivities. In the Leg 114 site chapters, the resis-tivities were not corrected for the borehole diameter effects orchanges in the salinity of the formation. However, the caliperlog was used to qualitatively monitor the effects of changes inborehole diameter on the resistivities. Conductivities are com-puted as the reciprocal of resistivity and are presented in the sitechapters.

Induced Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy

The induced gamma-ray spectroscopy (GST) tool is a neu-tron-activation tool. A pulsed neutron accelerator bombards theadjacent formation with high-energy neutrons and then mea-sures the time-varying energy spectrum of the gamma rays pro-duced by the bombardment. Each element has a "characteris-tic" spectral response to the neutron bombardment. The pres-ence of six elements is inferred from the GST: silicon (Si),calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), chlorine (Cl), hydrogen (H), and sulfur(S). This tool does not provide a quantitative elemental compo-sition but rather the relative proportions of the six elements(Ca, Cl, Si, Fe, H, and S), which sum to equal one. The rawcount rates for each element (elemental yields) therefore providea qualitative variation in elemental composition along the bore-hole. Research is currently underway to quantify these measure-ments. Interpretation of the GST data consists mainly of usingratios of the relative elemental proportions for lithologic identi-fication, porosity estimates, and determinations of the salinityof the formation fluid. Four elemental-yield ratios were rou-

19

SHIPBOARD SCIENTIFIC PARTY

tinely determined and used in the interpretation of the Leg 114GST data. The lithology indicator ratio (LIR), the ratio ofcounts of silicon to the sum of silicon plus calcium, was used asa semiquantitative indicator of the relative abundance of quartzand biogenic silica to calcite. The presence of clay minerals,however, complicates the interpretation of the LIR ratio. Theiron indicator ratio (HR), the ratio of iron counts to the summedsilicon plus calcium counts, can be a good measure of the totaliron concentration along the borehole, provided that there areno significant variations in aluminum in the clays. The porosityindicator ratio (PIR) is the ratio of hydrogen counts to the sumof silicon plus calcium counts. The PIR measures indirectly thetotal amount of free water (pore spaces) plus bound water (inclay minerals) by detecting hydrogen abundance. The salinityindicator ratio (SIR), the ratio of chlorine counts to hydrogencounts, is essentially a chlorinity indicator ratio. Because boundwater in clays contains hydrogen and may contain a significantand variable amount of chlorine, the SIR ratio should be usedwith caution. The best application is in formations lacking clayminerals.

A major advantage of the GST tool is that it works throughdrill pipe. When logging through pipe, however, the iron countswill be affected by the varying thickness and/or varying ironcontent of the pipe, and careful data reduction is required if oneis to interpret the IIR ratio with confidence. A major disadvan-tage of the GST is that multiple passes at a slow logging speed(150-200 m/hr) generally are required to accurately characterizethe energy spectrum. On Leg 114, the GST was run throughopen hole and through pipe. Because of time constraints, onlysingle passes were run in combination with the aluminum claytool (ACT) and the NGT, this affected the statistics built intothe interpretation. The ACT has a Californium (Cf) source thatprimarily activates aluminum (Al) and manganese (Mn). Theconcentrations of Al and Mn are determined from the measuredinduced gamma-ray activity. If properly calibrated, absolute ele-mental concentrations of Al (wt%) and relative variations inMn are determined. The combination of Al, Fe, and K may beused to determine the percentage of clay minerals in sediment.

DensityThe lithodensity tool (LDT, also known as gamma-gamma

density) uses two detectors. The short-spacing detector is muchmore sensitive to the density of the material immediately adja-cent to the face of the probe. The density computed from thenear detector is used to correct, or to "compensate," the densitycomputed from the far detector for effects of tool standoff re-sulting from mud cake or borehole rugosity. The LDT tool mea-sures the back-scattered gamma rays emitted by a Cesium (137C)source, and two energy windows (low and high) are analyzed forthe far detector. Gamma rays with energies less than 1.01 MeVinteract with atoms in the formation mainly by Compton scat-tering and through photoelectric effect. Gamma rays with ener-gies of 150 keV and higher are used in the density computationbecause they are subject mainly to the Compton scattering pro-cess, on which the density computation is based. The bulk den-sity of the formation is determined from the Compton scatteredgamma rays, which are a function of the electron density of therock and its matrix. The low-energy gamma rays (below 0.06MeV) are subject to photoelectric absorption. Therefore, thelow-energy window is used to monitor photoelectric effects. TheLDT log uses the ratio of the low- to high-energy windows tocompute the photoelectric index (Pe). Because photoelectric ab-sorption is mainly a function of the atomic number Z, Pe isused as a lithology indicator. The depth of investigation of theLDT is usually less than 10 cm.

Neutron PorosityThe neutron tool (CNL) uses a chemical radioactive source

to excite the formation with neutrons. Neutrons with both ther-mal and epithermal energies are captured by the nuclei in theformation, and each capture is accompanied by gamma-rayemission with energy dependent on the atom. The CNL mea-sures the hydrogen index of the formation by determining theamount of neutrons by hydrogen atoms. Porosity is then in-ferred from the hydrogen index assuming 100% water satura-tion. The CNL tool used on Leg 114 has two detectors, nearand far, again to compensate for variations in borehole size. As-suming water saturation in a hydrocarbon-free environment, theCNL measures the total water content of the formation, includ-ing pore water and bound water in clay minerals. "True" forma-tion porosity can be determined from the CNL if clay mineralsare lacking in the formation. The depth of investigation of thetool is less than 30 cm.

Caliper and Tension LogsOther auxiliary parameters measured include measurements

of the hole diameter and cable tension during a logging run.The hole diameter is measured with a caliper (MCD or CALI)consisting of a three-arm bowspring device. Caliper measure-ments are primarily used for correcting log responses that aresensitive to hole size. The tension measurements also monitorthe hole conditions and the performance of the heave compen-sation device.

Log ProcessingDuring logging, incoming data were monitored in real time

on an oscilloscope and simultaneously recorded digitally ontape in the Schlumberger logging unit. The Schlumberger tapeformat records data at 800 bpi and cannot be directly read onthe 1600-bpi tape drive used with the Masscomp computer sys-tem in the shipboard downhole logging laboratory. Therefore,after logging, the Schlumberger tape was copied from 800- to1600-bpi tape, and then read by the Masscomp and reformattedto Terralog log-interpretation format. The Terralog log-interpre-tation package is an interactive system with various log process-ing, interpretation, and display options. Preliminary log inter-pretations were carried out aboard the JOIDES Resolution, andmore detailed analyses will be done at the Borehole ResearchLaboratory of Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory and bythe Borehole Geophysics Research Group of the Geological Sur-vey of Canada.

REFERENCES

Archie, G. E., 1942. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determin-ing some reservoir characteristics. Trans. Am. Inst. Min., Metall.Pet. Eng., 146:54-67.

Barker, P. E, Kennett, J. P., et al., 1988. Proc. ODP, Init. Repts., 113:College Station, TX (Ocean Drilling Program).

Barron, J. A., 1985. Miocene to Holocene planktic diatoms. In Bolli,H. M., Saunders, J. B., and Perch-Nielsen, K. (Eds.), PlanktonStratigraphy: Cambridge (Cambridge Univ. Press), 763-809.

Berggren, W. A., Kent, D. V., and Flynn, J. J., 1985. Paleogene geo-chronology and chronostratigraphy. In Snelling, N. J. (Ed.), TheChronology of the Geological Record: Geol. Soc. London Mem.,10:141-195.

Berggren, W. A., Kent, D. V., and Van Couvering, J. A., 1985. Neogenegeochronology and chronostratigraphy. In Snelling, N. J. (Ed.), TheChronology of the Geological Record: Geol. Soc. London Mem.,10:211-260.

Bolli, H. M., Saunders, J. B., and Perch-Nielsen, K., 1985. Introduc-tion to foraminiferal chapters. In Bolli, H. M., Saunders, J. B., andPerch-Nielsen, K. (Eds.), Plankton Stratigraphy: Cambridge (Cam-bridge Univ. Press), 11-16.

20

EXPLANATORY NOTES

Borehole Research Group, 1985. Wireline Logging Manual, OceanDrilling Program: New York (Lamont-Doherty Geological Observa-tory).

Boyce, R. E., 1976. Appendix I: Definitions and laboratory techniquesof compressional sound velocity parameters and wet-water content,wet-bulk density and porosity parameters by gravimetric andgamma-ray attenuation techniques. In Schlanger S. O., Jackson,E. D., et al., Init. Repts. DSDP, 33: Washington (U.S. Govt. Print-ing Office), 931-958.

, 1977. Deep Sea Drilling Project procedures for shearstrength measurement of clayey sediment using modified WykehamFarrance laboratory vane apparatus. In Barker, P., Dalziel, I.W.D.,et al., Init. Repts. DSDP, 36: Washington (U.S. Govt. Printing Of-fice), 1059-1068.

Bukry, D., 1973. Low-latitude coccolith biostratigraphic zonation. InEdgar, N. T., Saunders, J. B., et al., Init. Repts. DSDP, 15: Wash-ington (U.S. Govt. Printing Office), 685-703.

, 1975. Coccolith and silicoflagellate stratigraphy, northwest-ern Pacific Ocean, Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 32. In Larson,R. L., Moberly, R., et al., Init. Repts. DSDP, 32: Washington (U.S.Govt. Printing Office), 677-701.

Burckle, L. H., Clarke, D. B., and Shackleton, N. J., 1978. Isochro-nous last-abundant-appearance datum (LAAD) of the diatom He-midiscus karstenii in the sub-Antarctic. Geology, 6:243-246.

Busen, K. E., and Wise, S. W., Jr., 1977. Silicoflagellate stratigraphy,Deep Sea Drilling Project, Leg 36. In Barker, P., Dalziel, I.W.D., etal., Init. Repts. DSDP, 36: Washington (U.S. Govt. Printing Of-fice), 697-743.

Caron, M., 1985. Cretaceous planktic foraminifera. In Bolli, H. M.,Saunders, J. B., and Perch-Nielsen, K. (Eds.), Plankton Stratigra-phy: Cambridge (Cambridge Univ. Press), 17-86.

Chen, P. H., 1975. Antarctic radiolaria. In Hayes, D. E., Frankes, L.A., et al., Init. Repts. DSDP, 28: Washington (U.S. Govt. PrintingOffice), 437-513.

Ciesielski, P. F., 1975. Biostratigraphy and paleoecology of Neogeneand Oligocene silicoflagellates from cores recovered during Antarc-tic Leg 28. In Hayes, D. E., Frakes, L. A., et al., Init. Repts. DSDP,28: Washington (U.S. Govt. Printing Office), 625-691.

, 1983. The Neogene and Quaternary diatom biostratigraphyof subantarctic sediments, Deep Sea Drilling Leg 71. In Ludwig,W. J., Krasheninnikov, V. A., et al., Init. Repts. DSDP, 71: Wash-ington (U.S. Govt. Printing Office), 635-666.

Cox, A. V., 1982. Magnetic reversal time scale. In Harland, W. B., Cox,A. V., Llewellyn, P. G., Pickton, C.A.G., Smith, A.G., and Walters,R. (Eds.), A Geologic Timescale: Cambridge (Cambridge Univ.Press), 63-82.

Cox, A. V., Doell, R. R., and Dalrymple, G. B., 1963. Geomagnetic po-larity epochs and Pleistocene geochronometry. Nature, 198:1049-1051.

Dean, W. E., Leinen, M., and Stow, D.A.V., 1984. Classification ofdeep-sea, fine grained sediments. J. Sediment. Petrol., 55:250-256.

Fanning, K. A., and Pilson, M.E.Q., 1973. On the spectrophotometricdetermination of dissolved silica in natural water. Anal. Chern., 45:136-140.

Fenner, J. M., 1984. Eocene-Oligocene planktic diatom stratigraphy inthe low latitudes and high southern latitudes. Micropaleontology,30:319-342.

Froelich, P. N., Kim, K. K., Jahnke, R. J., Burnett, W. R., and Deakin,M., 1983. Pore water fluoride in Peru continental margin sediments:uptake from seawater. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 47:1605-1612.

Gieskes, J., and Peretsman, G., 1986. Water chemistry proceduresaboard JOIDES Resolution—some comments. Ocean Drilling Pro-gram Technical Note, 5.

Gombos, A. M., Jr., and Ciesielski, P. F , 1983. Late Eocene to earlyMiocene diatoms from the southwest Atlantic. In Ludwig, W. J.,Krasheninnikov, V. A., et al., Init. Repts. DSDP, 71: Washington(U.S. Govt. Printing Office), 583-634.

Hamilton, E. L., 1971. Elastic properties of marine sediments. J. Geo-phys. Res., 76:579-604.

Hays, J. D., and Opdyke, N. D., 1967. Antarctic radiolaria, magneticreversals, and climatic change. Science, 158:1001-1011.

Hedberg, H. D., Salvador, A., and Opdyke, N. D., 1979. Magneto-stratigraphic polarity units: a supplementary chapter of the ISSC In-ternational Stratigraphic Guide. Geology, 7:578-583.

Jenkins, J. D., 1985. Southern mid-latitude Paleocene to Holoceneplanktic foraminifera. In Bolli, H. M., Saunders, J. B., and Perch-Nielsen, K. (Eds.), Plankton Stratigraphy: Cambridge (CambridgeUniv. Press), 263-282.

Kaharoeddin, F. A., Graves, R. S., Bergen, J. A., Eggers, M. R., Har-wood, D. M., Humphreys, C. L., Goldstein, E. H., Jones, S. C ,and Watkins, D. K., 1982. ARA Mas Orcadas cruise 1678 sedimentdescriptions. Sediment. Res. Lab. Florida State Univ., Contrib., 50.

Krasheninnikov, V. A., and Basov, I. A., 1983. Stratigraphy of Creta-ceous sediments of the Falkland Plateau based on planktonic fora-minifers, Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 71. In Ludwig, W. J., Krash-eninnikov, V. A., et al., Init. Repts. DSDP, 71: Washington (U.S.Govt. Printing Office), 789-820.

LaBrecque, J. L., Hsü, K. J., Carman, M. E, Jr., Karpoff, A.-M.,McKenzie, J. A., Percival, S. E, Jr., Petersen, N. P., Piscotto, K.A., Schreiber, E., lauxe, L., Tucker, P., Weissert, H. J., and Wright,R., 1983. DSDP Leg 73: contributions to Paleogene stratigraphy innomenclature, chronology and sedimentation rates. Paleogeogr., Pa-leoclimatol., Paleoecol., 42:91-125.

Ling, H. Y., 1973. Silicoflagellates and ebridians from Leg 19. In Crea-ger, J. S., Scholl, D. W., et al., Init. Repts. DSDP, 19: Washington(U.S. Govt. Printing Office), 751-775.

Martini, E., 1971. Standard Tertiary and Quaternary calcareous nanno-plankton zonation. In Farinacci, A. (Ed.), Proc. Planktonic Conf. IIRome 1970: Rome (Technoscienze), 2:739-785.

McCollum, D. W, 1975. Diatom stratigraphy of the Southern Ocean. InHayes, D. E., Frakes, L. A., et al., Init. Repts. DSDP, 28: Washing-ton (U.S. Govt. Printing Office), 515-572.

McGowran, B., 1986. Cainozoic oceanic and climatic events: the Indo-Pacific foraminiferal biostratigraphic records. Palaegeogr., Palaeo-climatol., Palaeoecol., 55:247-265.

Miller, K. G., Aubry, M.-P., Khan, M. H., Melillo, A. J., Kent,D. V., and Berggren, W. A., 1985. Oligocene to Miocene bio-, mag-neto- and isotopic stratigraphy of the western North Atlantic. Geol-ogy, 13:257-261.

Morkhoven, F.P.C.M. van, Berggren, W. A., and Edwards, A. S., 1986.Cenozoic cosmopolitan deep-water benthic foraminifera. Mem.Cent. Rech. Explor. Prod. Elf Aquitaine, 11.

Mullin, J. B., and Riley, J. P., 1955. The colorimetric determination ofsilicate, with special reference to natural waters. Anal. Chim. Acta,12:162-176.

Munsell Soil Color Charts, 1971. Baltimore (Munsell Color).Parsons, T. R., Maita, Y., and Lalti, C , 1984. A Manual of Chemical

and Biological Methods for Seawater Analysis: New York (Perga-mon), 25-28.

Perch-Nielsen, K., 1975. Late Cretaceous to Pleistocene archaeomonads,ebridians, endoskeletal dinoflagellates, and other siliceous microfos-sils from the subantarctic Southwest Pacific, DSDP, Leg 29. In Ken-nett, J. P., Houtz, R. E., et al., Init. Repts. DSDP: Washington(U.S. Govt. Printing Office), 873-907.

, 1985. Cenozoic calcareous nannofossils. In Bolli,H. M., Saunders, J. B., and Perch-Nielsen, K. (Eds.), PlanktonStratigraphy: Cambridge (Cambridge Univ. Press), 427-554.

Pujol, C , and Sigal, J., 1979. Les Foraminiferes de Madagascar—Bio-stratigraphic (DSDP, Leg 25): Bordeaux (CNRS).

Ruddiman, W, Sarnthein, M., et al., 1988. Proc. ODP, Init. Repts.,108: College Station, TX (Ocean Drilling Program).

Ryan, W. F., Cita, M. B., Rawson, M. D., Burckle, L. H., and Saito,T, 1974. A paleomagnetic assignment of Neogene stage boundariesand the development of isochronous datum planes between the Med-iterranean, the Pacific and Indian oceans in order to investigate theresponse of the world ocean to the Mediterranean "salinity crisis."Riv. Ital. Paleont., 80:631-688.

Sanfilippo, A., Westberg-Smith, M. J., and Riedel, W. R., 1985. Ceno-zoic radiolaria. In Bolli, H. M., Saunders, J. B., and Perch-Nielsen,K. (Eds.), Plankton Stratigraphy: Cambridge (Cambridge Univ.Press), 573-630.

Schlumberger, Inc., 1972. Log Interpretation: Vol. 1, Principles: NewYork (Schlumberger).

Serra, O., 1984. Fundamentals of Well Log Interpretation: Volume 1.The Acquisition of Logging Data: Amsterdam (Elsevier).

Shaw, C. A., and Ciesielski, P. F , 1983. Silicoflagellate biostratigraphyof middle Eocene to Holocene Subantarctic sediments recovered byDeep Sea Drilling Project Leg 71. In Ludwig, W. J., Krasheninnikov,

21

SHIPBOARD SCIENTIFIC PARTY

V. A., et al., Init. Repts. DSDP, 71: Washington (U.S. Govt. Print-ing Office), 687-737.

Sissingh, W., 1977. Biostratigraphy of Cretaceous calcareous nanno-plankton. Geol. Mijnbouw, 56:335-350.

Sliter, W. V., 1977. Cretaceous foraminifers from the southern AtlanticOcean Leg 36, Deep Sea Drilling Project. In Barker, P., Dalziel,I.W.D., et al., Init. Repts. DSDP, 36: Washington (U.S. Govt.Printing Office), 519-574.

Stainforth, R. M., Lamb, J. L., Luterbacher, H., Beard, J. H., and Jef-fords, R. M., 1975. Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal zonation andcharacteristics of index forms. Univ. Kans. Paleontol. Contrib. Art.,62.

Strickland, J.D.H., 1952. The preparation and properties of silico-mo-lybdic acid. J. Am. Chern. Soc, 74:862-876.

Strickland, J.D.H., and Parsons, T. R., 1968. A practical handbook ofseawater analysis. Bull. Fish. Res. Board Can., 167:49-62.

Tjalsma, R. C , 1977. Cenozoic foraminifera from the South Atlantic,DSDP Leg 36. In Barker, P., Dalziel, I.W.D., et al., Init. Repts.DSDP, 36: Washington (U.S. Govt. Printing Office), 493-518.

Tjalsma, R. C , and Lohmann, G. P., 1983. Paleocene-Eocene bathyaland abyssal benthic foraminifera from the Atlantic Ocean. Micropa-leontology Spec. Publ., 4.

Vine, F. J., and Matthews, D. H., 1963. Magnetic anomalies over oce-anic ridges. Nature, 199:947-949.

Von Herzen, R. P., and Maxwell, A. E., 1959. The measurements ofthermal conductivity of deep-sea sediments by a needle probemethod. /. Geophys. Res., 64:1557-1563.

Weaver, F. M., 1983. Cenozoic radiolarians from the southwest Atlan-tic, Falkland Plateau region, Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 71. InLudwig, W. J., Krasheninnikov, V. A., et al., Init. Repts. DSDP, 71:Washington (U.S. Govt. Printing Office), 667-686.

Weaver, F. M., and Gombos, A. M., Jr., 1981. Southern high latitudediatom biostratigraphy. In Warme, J. E., Douglas, R. G., and Win-terer, E. L. (Eds.), The Deep Sea Drilling Project: A Decade of Pro-gress: Spec. Publ. Soc. Econ. Paleontol. Mineral., 32:445-470.

Wise, S. W., 1983. Mesozoic and Cenozoic calcareous nannofossils re-covered by Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 71 in the Falkland PlateauRegion, southwest Atlantic Ocean. In Ludwig, W. J., Krasheninni-kov, V. A., et al., Init. Repts. DSDP, 71: Washington (U.S. Govt.Printing Office), 481-550.

Wise, S. W, and Constans, R. E., 1976. Mid-Eocene planktonic cor-rleations: northern Italy-Jamaica, W. I. Trans. Gulf Coast Assoc.Geol Soc, 26:144-155.

Ms 114A-101

22