Upload
caroline-fagan
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Facilitating Restorative Group Conferences
Lesson 2: Conferencing and Restorative Justice
Minnesota Department of Correctionswith the National Institute of Corrections
2
Lesson Objectives Understand and articulate the values and
principles of restorative justice. Understand accountability within the
framework of conferencing. Identify the benefits and risks of
conferencing. Explain similarities/differences between
some face to face restorative practices. Explain the history of victim/offender
processes. Explain how conferencing relates to or fits
within the restorative justice framework.
3
When faced with harm or wrong doing:
Revenge Retribution Restoration
4
Revenge:Weaknesses include:
People take justice into their own hands - vigilantism
5
Retribution: Weaknesses include: Punitive, impersonal, state-centered Discourages offender empathy and
responsibility taking Leaves out victim and community
and does not address their needs Worsens wounds by separating
justice from healing
6
Restoration: Emphasizes harms and resulting
obligations Keeps victims’ needs/interests
central Encourages offenders to understand
and take responsibility for harm Involves dialogue and the community Promotes individual and societal
healing
7
Retributive Lens
What laws were broken? Who did it? What punishment do they deserve?
8
Restorative Lens
Who has been hurt by this event? What are their needs? Whose obligations are they?
9
Restorative Core Principle 1
Harm-focused - laws broken are lessimportant than how people were harmed Victim = central Offender = accountable to understand and
make right Repairing the harm = central Community suffered harm and is part of
obligation to repair it
10
Restorative Core Principle 2
Engagement - assumes that the offender victim, and community
must all be actively involved in the process of resolving the harm
11
Primary Stakeholders
Victim(s)
Offender(s)
Community
12
Restorative Measures Like Group Conferencing …
Allow us to: talk it through identify solutions restore order
13
Conferencing Participants: Victims and Supporters Primary victim or victims Secondary victims: adversely affected
by the harm’s aftermath Affected parties: arresting officers,
school administrators, etc. Supporters: friends, peers, siblings,
neighbors, counselors, teachers, extended family
14
Conferencing Participants: Offenders and Supporters Person or persons who caused harm Friends, peers, associates or family members
who were not actively involved but knew about the harm
Supporters: family, extended family, (including older and younger siblings), friends, teachers, counselors, neighbors, probation officers, etc.
15
Conferencing Participants: Other Community Members Community = Any group of people that share
common interest, geography or topic System and authorities: criminal justice
system and school administrators People who live in the area where the harm
happened: neighborhood, classroom, playground witnesses.
Organizations that support victims or offenders
Cultural leaders
16
Risks and Benefits Brainstorm a list of
risks and benefits for the victim who may participate in a conference.
Brainstorm a list of risks and benefits for the offender who may participate in a conference.
Brainstorm a list of risks and benefits for community members who may participate in a conference.
17
Where Conferencing Fits (CJS)
PAROLE & REENTRY
PRE-TRIAL OR PRE-
ADJUDICATION
PREVENTION & EARLY
INTERVENTION
DIVERSION
PROBATION
PRISON OR COMMITMENT
Conferencing Opportunity
18
Where Conferencing Fits (Schools)
Conferencing Opportunity
ISS OR IMMEDIATEL
Y
PRE- RETURN TO CLASS,
PROGRAM
CLASSROOM ROLEPLAYS,
TEACH RJ SKILLS
SUSPENSION
EXPULSION
RE-ENTRY TO DISTRICT
19
Participation Is Based On:
Choice – it is voluntary for victim and partly voluntary for offender
An admission of harm done A willingness to problem solve Awareness that any participant may
stop at any time Participants decide outcome
20
Zehr & Mika Signposts Focus on the harms of wrongdoing more
than the rules that have been broken Show equal concern and commitment to
victims and offenders, involving both in the process of justice
Work toward the restoration of victims, empowering them and responding to their needs as they see them
21
Support offenders while encouraging them to understand, accept and carry out their obligations
Recognize that while obligations may be difficult for offenders, they should not be intended as punishment and they must be achievable
Provide opportunities for dialogue, direct or indirect, between victims and offenders, as appropriate
22
Involve and empower the affected community through the justice process and increase its capacity to recognize and respond to community bases of crime
Encourage collaboration and reintegration rather than coercion and isolation
23
Give attention to the unintended consequences of our actions and programs
Show respect to all parties including victims, offenders, and justice colleagues
Harry Mika and
Howard Zehr, May 1997
24
Crime is a wound.
Justice should be healing.
25
Some Current Face to Face Practices Victim/offender mediation (dialogue) Family group conferencing Community conferencing Community panels Large group conferencing Peacemaking circles
Demonstrations!
26
Victim/Offender Mediation
First program: 1974, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Joint program – probation and the Mennonite Central Committee
First in U.S: 1978, Elkhart, Indiana, U.S. Operated by probation first, then transferred
to non-profit community organization Elkhart program included adult offenders,
Kitchener only juveniles Cases of severe violence take more training
and preparation
27
VICTIM/OFFENDER MEDIATION (DIALOGUE)
Facilitator
Offender
SupporterVictim
Supporter
28
Family Group Conferencing
FGC was developed in New Zealand out of Maori tribal traditions
used there for child welfare and juvenile delinquency cases
Transformative Justice Australia modified model for JD matters (Wagga Wagga Model)
Wagga Wagga Model brought to U.S. by REAL JUSTICE in 1995
29
FAMILY GROUP CONFERENCE
FACILITATOR
SUPPORTER
ON/HUMAN
SERVICES &/ORPROBATIONSERVICES
SUPPORTER
VICTIM
MEMBER OF COMMUNITY
OFFENDER
ON/SCHOOL
ADMINISTRATION OR LAW
ENFORCEMENTSERVICES
30
COMMUNITY PANEL
CommunityMember/Facilitator
OffenderSupporter
Community Panel
Member
Community Panel
Member
SupporterDirect Victim
31
OFFENDER
OFFENDERFACILITATOR
VICTIM
LARGE GROUP CONFERENCING
SUPPORTER
PARENT
VICTIM
MEMBER ORCOMMUNITY
A.F. = ASST. FACILITATOR OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO A.F. A.F. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO A.F. A.F. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO A.F. A.F. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO A.F. A.F. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO A.F. A.F. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO A.F. A.F. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
O = OTHER VICTIMS, OFFENDERS, SUPPORTERS, FAMILY MEMBERS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS
SUPPORTER
32
CIRCLES OF UNDERSTANDING
KEEPER
HUMANSERVICES
PROBATIONOFFICER
SUPPORTER
OFFENDER
COMMUNITYMEMBER
FAMILYMEMBER
COMMUNITYMEMBER
SUPPORTER
VICTIM
POLICE OFFICER
FAMILYMEMBER
COMMUNITYMEMBER
33
Evolution of Conferencing
Includes adult offenders ‘Personal’ as well as property crimes Expanded scope of what is addressed Broadened to other non-justice settings Incorporated into multi-method programs 100’s of programs in North America,
more in Europe and elsewhere
34
Cases of Severe Violence
Takes more intense training and preparation
Specialized expertise related to working with victims who have been severely traumatized
Special considerations for dealing with offenders in incarceration
Slower moving process, dealing with grief and healing
35
Goals of Restorative Group Conferencing: Offender Accountability Understanding better the harm done
and those affected Being accountable to the person
harmed Being accountable to the community Having responsibility to repair the
harm
36
Restorative Conferencing’s Goals:Community Accountability
Attending to the victim’s wounds Participating in a resolution Providing opportunities for offender’s
community service/restitution earning Identifying and addressing underlying
community conditions
37
Restorative Conferencing’s Goals:Victim Opportunities
Choice in how they want to proceed Opportunity to talk about what happened Voice in how to right the wrongs A way to feel some power, safety,
reassurance Chance to have questions answered
38
Restorative Conferencing’s Goals:Community Protection/Safety Timely response Reassertion of community expectations Stressing individual, parental, and
community responsibilities Reducing recidivism Strengthening community by building
relationships and providing opportunities for empathy between all participants
39
Restorative Conferencing’s Goals:Competency Development Direct community involvement creates
community competency and builds relationships
Offender agrees to processes that can develop competency: problem solving, empathy, communication, etc.
40
Activity
Simple, Challenging, Outrageous