23
1 資資資資 Financial Leverage and Ca pital Structure Policy

1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

1

資本結構Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

Page 2: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

2

How to decide the optional capital structure?

What’s the objective?maximize firm valuemaximize firm valueminimize WACC

A particular debt/equity ratio represents the optional capital structure if it results in the lowest possible WACC.

Page 3: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

3

Financial Leverage 財務槓桿/ Financial Risk 財務風險

Financial leverage affects the payoffs to stockholders.

An example:Panel A: Current capital structure: no debtRecession Expected ExpansionEBIT 500000 1000000 1500000interest 0 0 0net income 500000 1000000 1500000ROE 6.25% 12.50% 18.75%EPS 1.25 2.5 3.75

Page 4: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

4

Panel B: Proposed capital structure: debt = 4 million

Recession Expected ExpansionEBIT 500000 1000000 1500000interest 400000 400000 400000net income 100000 600000 1100000ROE 2.50% 15.00% 27.50%EPS 0.5 3 5.5

Page 5: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

5

EPS vs. EBIT 每股盈餘無異分析EPS with debt

Good no debt

No good

Page 6: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

6

Break-even point

EPS will be the same for both capital structures:

800000

200000

40000

400000*

EBIT

EBITEBIT

Page 7: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

7

Example

Before: 200,000 shares * $20 @ share = $4,000,000Debt 1,000,000After 3,000,000

/20

150,000 shares

360000

150000

40000

200000*

EBIT

EBITEBIT

Page 8: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

8

Conclusion

The effect of financial leverage depends on the firm’s EBIT. When EBIT is relatively high, leverage is beneficial.Shareholders are exposed to more risk under the proposed capital structure since the EPS and ROE are much more sensitive to change in EBIT.

Page 9: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

9

Question

Because of the impact that financial leverage has on both the expected return to stockholders and the riskness of the stock, capital structure is an important consideration.Answer: no.∵Shareholders can adjust the amount of financial leverage by borrowing and lending on their own. The use of personal borrowing to alter the degree of financial leverage is called homemade leverage.

Page 10: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

10

Homemade leverage

Panel A: proposed capital structure

Recession Expected ExpansionEPS 0.5 3 5.5Earnings for 100 shares 50 300 550Net cost 100*20=2000

Page 11: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

11

Panel B: original capital structure and homemade leverage

Recession Expected ExpansionEPS 1.25 2.5 3.75Earnings for 200 shares 250 500 750Less: interest on 2000 at 10% 200 200 200Net earnings 50 300 550Net cost 200*20-amount borrowed=4000-2000=2000

Page 12: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

12

Investors can always increase financial leverage themselves to create a different pattern of payoffs. It thus makes no different whether a firm restructure the capital structure.There is nothing special about corporate borrowing because investors can borrow or lend on their own. As a result, whichever capital structure a firm chooses, the stock price will be the same.

Page 13: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

13

M&M proposition I: Modigliani and Miller

The value of the firm is independent of its capital structure.Example:

• .firm value distribution: stockholders vs. debtholders.

• .whole milk: cream vs. skim milk.• .pie: more pieces, but not more pizza. The siz

e of the pizza does not depend on how it is sliced.

Page 14: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

14

M&M proposition II

A firm’s cost of equity is a positive linear function of its capital structure.

assuming no taxDEA R

V

DR

V

ERWACC

E

DRRRR DAAE

RE

RE

WACCRD

D/E

Page 15: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

15

M&M propositions with corporate tax

Properties of debttax benefit vs. bankruptcy cost

Example:Firm U: unlevered, Firm L: levered.Assuming two firms are identical on the left-hand sid

e of the balance sheet, only different on capital structure. Firm U Firm L

EBIT 1000 1000Interest 0 80Taxable income 1000 920Taxed(30%) 300 276Net income 700 644

Page 16: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

16

The interest tax shield

Cash flow to stockholders and bondholders

Cash flows from assets Firm U Firm LEBIT 1000 1000-taxes 300 276Total 700 724

Cash flow Firm U Firm Lto stockholders 700 644to bondholders 0 80Total 700 724

Page 17: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

17

$80*30%=24: This tax saving is called interest tax shieldThe value of tax shield is

present value of the interest tax shield =

M&M proposition I with tax

Suppose , which we call is as the unlevered cost of capital.

3001000*3.008.0

08.0*1000*03

08.0

24PV

DTRRDT CDDC ***

DTVV CUL *

7000

1.0

7001*

U

CU R

TEBITV

73001000*3.07000* DTVV CUL

Page 18: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

18

The analysis implies that, once we include taxes, the optimal capital structure is 100% debt.

DTVV CUL *

T c * D

V u

Page 19: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

19

M&M proposition II with tax

Without debt, the WACC is 10%, and, with debt, the WACC is 9.6%. The firm is better off with debt.

E

TDRRRR C

DUUE

1

%22.10

6300

3.01100008.01.01.0

ER

CDE TRV

DR

V

EWACC 1

%6.93.01%87300

1000%22.10

7300

6300WACC

Page 20: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

20

Example: 1.0R ,2.0R 500,D ,34.0T ,52.151 DUC EBIT

Q : W h a t i s t h e v a l u e o f e q u i t y ?W h a t i s t h e c o s t o f e q u i t y ?W h a t i s t h e W A C C ?

500

2.0

100

2.0

34.01*52.1511*

U

CU R

TEBITV

670500*34.0500* DTVV CUL

T h e v a l u e o f e q u i t y : 170500670 DVE L

F r o m M & M p r o p o s i t i o n I I , t h e c o s t o f e q u i t y :

E

TDRRRR C

DUUE

1

%4.39

170

34.015001.02.02.0

ER

T h e W A C C i s :

CDE TRV

DR

V

EWACC 1

%92.1434.01%10670

500%4.39

670

170WACC

Page 21: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

21

RE

WACCRD

D/E

Page 22: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

22

Debt has tax benefit, but also has cost, bankruptcy cost.Bankruptcy costs:Direct bankruptcy costIndirect bankruptcy cost

DTVV CUL *

b a n k r u p t c y c o s tT c * D t r u e f i r m v a l u e

V u

Page 23: 1 資本結構 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

23

RE

RuWACCRD

D/E