79
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley [email protected]

1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

1

George Mason School of Law

Contracts II

Fraud

F.H. Buckley

[email protected]

Page 2: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Fraus omnia corrumpit

I met Murder on the way – He had a mask like Castlereagh – Very smooth he looked, yet grim; Seven blood-hounds followed him:

Next came Fraud, and he had on, Like Eldon, an ermined gown;His big tears, for he wept wellTurned to mill-stones as they fell

2

Shelly, The Mask of Anarchy

Lord Eldon ordered that Shelley’s children be taken from him

Page 3: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Elements of Fraud A False Representation

Restatement § 159

3

Page 4: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Elements of Fraud A False Representation

Which the Δ knows to be false. Restatement § 162(1)(a)

4

Page 5: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Elements of Fraud A False Representation Which the Δ knows to be false.

Made with the intention to induce the Π to enter into the contract. Restatement § 162(1)

5

Page 6: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Elements of Fraud A False Representation Which the Δ knows to be false. Made with the intention to induce Π’s to

enter into the contract.

On which the Π relies. Restatement § 164

6

Page 7: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Elements of Fraud A False Representation Which the Δ knows to be false. Made with the intention to induce Π’s to

enter into the contract. On which Π relies.

And which is material Restatement §§ 164(1), 162(2)

7

Page 8: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Elements of Fraud A False Representation Which the Δ knows to be false. Made with the intention to induce Π’s to

enter into the contract. On which Π relies.

And which is material Restatement §§ 164(1), 162(2) Does § 164(1) dispense with materiality, if the

representation is fraudulent?

8

Page 9: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Elements of Fraud A False Representation Which the Δ knows to be false. Made with the intention to induce Π’s to

enter into the contract. On which Π relies.

And which is material Restatement §§ 164(1), 162(2) What does “upon which the recipient is justified in relying”

mean?

9

Page 10: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Elements of Fraud Does the Restatement water down

materiality? “the maker knows it would be likely to induce

the recipient.” § 162(2) “a fraudulent … representation … upon which

the recipient is justified in relying.” § 164

What does § 164 do to the fraud requirement? Innocent material misrepresentations

10

Page 11: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Elements of FraudBut none of this is cut-and-dried

A False Representation

Which the Δ knows to be false.

Made with the intention to induce Π’s to enter into the contract.

On which Π relies.

And which is material

11

Page 12: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Elements of FraudThe Restatement on Reliance

A False Assertion. § 159

Which the Δ knows to be false. § 162(1)(a)

Made with the intention to induce Π’s to enter into the contract. § 162(1)

On which Π relies. § 164

And which is material. §§ 164(1), 162(2)

12

Page 13: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Elements of Fraud

What is an assertion? Restatement §§ 159

13

Page 14: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Elements of Fraud

Restatement § 159: What is an assertion?What aren’t assertions?

14

Page 15: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

What is an Assertion?“It works”: You got a problem with that?

15

Page 16: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Mere puffs are not assertionsSimplex commendatio non obligat

16

Page 17: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Mere puffsSpeiss v. Brandt

17

What were the alleged representations?

Lake McFarland

Page 18: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Mere puffsSpeiss v. Brandt

18

What if the Δs had said “You can make good money out of the resort”?

Or “I believe you can make good money out of it”?

Page 19: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Mere puffsSpeiss v. Brandt

19

Qu. “We are making good money out of the resort.”

Page 20: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Mere puffsSpeiss v. Brandt

20

Qu. “We are making good money out of the resort.” What is the optimal profit to make where

there is double taxation of dividends? Cf. Gallagher’s dissent

Page 21: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Mere puffsSpeiss v. Brandt

21

“We are making good money out of the resort.” What if they had provided the financials?

Page 22: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Mere puffsSpeiss v. Brandt

22

“We are making good money out of the resort.” What if they had provided the financials? What do you conclude from the buyers’

willingness to do the deal even though the financials were not provided

Page 23: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Mere puffsSpeiss v. Brandt

23

“We are making good money out of the resort.”What if they had provided the financials?

Restatement § 172A subjective or an objective test?

Page 24: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Mere puffsSpeiss v. Brandt

24

“We are making good money out of the resort.” Suppose the seller had omitted to say

anything about past earnings?

Page 25: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Mere puffsSpeiss v. Brandt

25

“We are making good money out of the resort.” Suppose the seller had omitted to say

anything about past earnings?Fraudulent concealment? Restatement § 161?

Page 26: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

How is the reliance requirement treated in Ziff-Davis?

26

Page 27: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

How is the reliance requirement treated in Ziff-Davis?

Distinguish the action in fraud from the action for breach of warranty

Suing in tort: Punitive damages

Page 28: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

28

George Mason School of Law

Contracts II

Fraud

F.H. Buckley

[email protected]

Page 29: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Merger Clause in Danann

What is it and why did the parties agree to it?

Page 30: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Merger Clause in Danann

Absent the merger clause, what result?

Page 31: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Merger Clause in Danann

Absent the merger clause, what result? The representations would ordinarily be

excluded by the Parole Evidence Rule Here however the fraud exception to the

Parole Evidence Rule would apply.

Page 32: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Merger Clause in Danann

Absent the merger clause, what result? The representations would ordinarily be

excluded by the Parole Evidence Rule Here however the fraud exception to the

Parole Evidence Rule would apply. Did the Δs misrepresent their financials?

Page 33: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Merger Clause in Danann

Absent the merger clause, what result? The representations would ordinarily be

excluded by the Parole Evidence Rule Here however the fraud exception to the

Parole Evidence Rule would apply. Did the Δs misrepresent their financials? Does the sophistication of the parties

matter?

Page 34: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Signing a ContractMerit Music

34

Bar, 601 South Monroe St.Baltimore MD

Page 35: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Signing a ContractMerit Music

Were the terms harsh?

35

Page 36: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Signing a ContractMerit Music

Were the terms harsh?120 plays of the pinball machine @

week48 plays of the juke box @ week

36

Page 37: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Signing a ContractMerit Music

Were the terms harsh?Who was in the best position to

determine the revenue from the machines?

37

Page 38: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Signing a ContractMerit Music

Were the terms harsh?Who was in the best position to

determine the revenue from the machines?

Were the Sonneborns inexperienced?

38

Page 39: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Signing a ContractMerit Music

Were the terms harsh?Who was in the best position to

determine the revenue from the machines?

Were the Sonneborns inexperienced?Did they have any reason to think that

what they signed was not a contract?

39

Page 40: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Signing a ContractMerit Music

Have you ever signed a contract without reading it? What effect did you think the printed language had? Restatement § 211(1)

40

Page 41: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Signing a ContractMerit Music

Were the terms harsh?Does that matter?

41

Page 42: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Signing a ContractMerit Music

Were the terms harsh?Does that matter?Should Restatement § 211(3) have

been triggered?

42

Page 43: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Standard Form ContractsBirmingham TV v. Water Works

Were the terms benign?

43

Page 44: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Standard Form ContractsBirmingham TV v. Water Works

Were the terms benign? Is that irrelevant?

44

Page 45: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Standard Form ContractsBirmingham TV v. Water Works

Were the terms harsh?

How would you expect bailees to react to the decision?

45

Page 46: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Standard Form Contracts

Were the terms harsh? Does that matter?

How would you expect bailees to react to the decision?Is the world now a better place?

46

Page 47: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Thank God for proper warning signs

Page 48: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Thank God for proper warning signs

Page 49: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Thank God for proper warning signs

Page 50: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Why Employ Standard Form Contracts?

50

Page 51: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Why Employ Standard Form Contracts?

Economize on negotiations

51

Page 52: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Why Employ Standard Form Contracts?

Economize on negotiations

Police consumer fraud

52

Page 53: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Why Employ Standard Form Contracts?

Economize on negotiations

Police consumer fraud

Economize on litigation

53

Page 54: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Why Employ Standard Form Contracts?

Economize on negotiations

Police consumer fraud

Economize on litigation

Police agency costs of merchant

54

Page 55: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Why Employ Standard Form Contracts?

Suppose the consumer is illiterate or can’t speak English

55Elbonians

Page 56: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Why Employ Standard Form Contracts?

Suppose that most non-lawyers would have a hard time understanding the language? You mean we let such people enter into

contracts!?!?

56

Page 57: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Why Employ Standard Form Contracts?

Suppose that most non-lawyers would have a hard time understanding the language? Cf. Pirkle v. Gurr, 438-39

57

Page 58: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Non-disclosure

What happened in Laidlaw? P. 451

58

Treaty of Ghent

Page 59: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

59

Rational Choice: Six Assumptions

Full Information No mistakes No misrepresentations And no informational asymmetries

Page 60: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Non-disclosure

“I’ll pay $500 for the rug” [but will go as high as $1,000].

60

Page 61: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Non-disclosure

Coca-Cola sells Coke but refuses to disclose the secret formula it uses to make it.

61

Page 62: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Non-disclosureCicero, Offices III

A corn-merchant arrives at the famine-stricken city of Rhodes, before a great number of other vessels loaded with corn; and offers his corn for sale. Is he obliged to inform the buyers that there are a great number of other vessels about to arrive, laden with food?

Diogenes thought not. But Cicero thought, on the contrary, that this dissimulation was against good faith. There ought to exist among men a concord and affection which cannot permit us to prefer our private interest to the interest of our neighbor.

62

Page 63: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Non-disclosureAquinas, Summa Theologica

If one were bound to tell the faults of what one offers for sale, this would only be in order to lower the price. Now sometimes the price would be lowered for some other reason, without any defect in the thing sold: for instance, if the seller carry wheat to a place where wheat fetches a high price, knowing that many will come after him carrying wheat; because if the buyers knew this they would give a lower price. But apparently the seller need not give the buyer this information. Therefore, in like manner, neither need he tell him the faults of the goods he is selling.

ST 1.2.94.2, obj. 4

63

Page 64: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Non-disclosureAquinas, Summa Theologica

If one were bound to tell the faults of what one offers for sale, this would only be in order to lower the price. Now sometimes the price would be lowered for some other reason, without any defect in the thing sold: for instance, if the seller carry wheat to a place where wheat fetches a high price, knowing that many will come after him carrying wheat; because if the buyers knew this they would give a lower price. But apparently the seller need not give the buyer this information. Therefore, in like manner, neither need he tell him the faults of the goods he is selling.

Under which rule is the famine soonest over?

64

Page 65: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Non-disclosure

What should the buyer have concluded from the seller’s silence about changed market conditions?

65

Page 66: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Non-disclosure

Which rule better promotes efficiency in Laidlaw?

66

Page 67: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Non-disclosure

Which rule better promotes efficiency in Laidlaw? The incentive to acquire information

67

Page 68: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Non-disclosure

Which rule better promotes efficiency in Laidlaw? The incentive to acquire information Litigation over nondisclosures

68

Page 69: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Non-disclosure

An industry analyst discovers that a public firm has fraudulently inflated its profits, and shorts its stock without disclosing his find.

69

Page 70: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Non-disclosure

An industry analyst discovers that a public firm has fraudulently inflated its profits, and shorts its stock without disclosing his find. If this were illegal, what would happen to

his incentive to discover the information?

70

Page 71: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Non-disclosure

A company executive in the same firm sells his stock without making disclosure. Same result?

71

Page 72: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Non-disclosure

A company executive in the same firm sells his stock without making disclosure.Kronman: was there a cost to production

of the information?

72

Page 73: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Non-disclosure

A company executive in the same firm sells his stock without making disclosure.Kronman: was the a cost to production of

the information?Under which rule is the information

processed in the market most quickly?

73

Page 74: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Non-disclosure

Should Obde be confined to its special facts? And these were?

74Termites

Page 75: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Non-disclosure

Should Obde be confined to its special facts? Does it matter that this was an

apartment house? Does it matter that it was termites? Does it matter that the seller made the

defect harder to discover?

75

Page 76: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Non-disclosure

Should Obde be confined to its special facts? Does it matter that this was an

apartment house? Does it matter that it was termites? Does it matter that the seller made the

defect harder to discover?Restatement §§ 160, 161(b)

76

Page 77: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Restatement § 160In some states, bondo is a primary color

77

Page 78: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Reed v. King

78

O.J.’s House

Page 79: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Fraud F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

79

George Mason School of Law

Contracts II

Unconscionability

F.H. Buckley

[email protected]