LECTURE NOTES PART 1

EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS WITH LABOR LAWS

AND CBA

INTRODUCTION TO LABOR LAWS

TOPICAL GUIDE:

PART 1

1. Adam Smith and the Invisible Hand

2. Government regulation in the Philippines: PD 442

3. Classifications of labor laws

4. What labor laws encompasses

5. Foundation of labor laws: Police Power

6. Aim, reason, justification for labor laws: Social Justice

7. Constitutional basis of social justice

INTRODUCTION TO LABOR LAWS

TOPICAL GUIDE….

8. Constitutional basis of labor laws

9. Balancing the interest of the employer and the employees

10. International Labor Organization

11. Construction in favor of labor

12. Existence of Employer-Employee relations

A. Four-fold test

B. Economic Reality Test

C. Two-tiered test (Multi-factor test)

13. Kinds of Employment

14. Cases

CAPITALISM V GOVERNMENT REGULATION

Adam Smith

Historically, the U.S. government policy toward business was summed up by the French term laissez-faire -- "leave it alone." The concept came from the economic theories of Adam Smith, the 18th-century Scot whose writings greatly influenced the growth of American capitalism. Smith believed that private interests should have a free rein. As long as markets were free and competitive, he said, the actions of private individuals, motivated by self-interest, would work together for the greater good of society. Smith did favor some forms of government intervention, mainly to establish the ground rules for free enterprise. But it was his advocacy of laissez-faire practices that earned him favor in America, a country built on faith in the individual and distrust of authority.

CAPITALISM V GOVERNMENT REGULATION

Government regulation of private industry can be divided into two categories -- economic regulation and social regulation. Economic regulation seeks, primarily, to control prices. Designed in theory to protect consumers and certain companies (usually small businesses) from more powerful companies, it often is justified on the grounds that fully competitive market conditions do not exist and therefore cannot provide such protections themselves. In many cases, however, economic regulations were developed to protect companies from what they described as destructive competition with each other. Social regulation, on the other hand, promotes objectives that are not economic -- such as safer workplaces or a cleaner environment

http://economics.about.com/od/governmenttheeconomy/a/laissez_faire.htm

The “Invisible Hand”

by trying to maximize their own gains in a free market, individual ambition benefits society, even if the ambitious have no benevolent intentions

directly linked to the concept of the market: specifically that it is competition between buyers and sellers that channels the profit motive of individuals on both sides of the transaction such that improved products are produced and at lower costs.

For example, the inhabitants of a poor country will be willing to work very cheaply, so entrepreneurs can make great profits by building factories in poor countries. Because they increase the demand for labor, they will increase its price; further, because the new producers also become consumers, local businesses must hire more people to provide the things they want to consume. As this process continues, the labor prices eventually rise to the point where there is no advantage for the foreign countries doing business in the formerly poor country. Overall, this mechanism causes the local economy to function on its own.

The “Invisible Hand”

As a metaphor, Adam Smith uses it in the context of an argument against protectionism and government regulation of markets, but it is based on very broad principles developed by Bernard Mandeville, Bishop Butler, Lord Shaftesbury, and Francis Hutcheson. In general, the term "invisible hand" can apply to any individual action that has unplanned, unintended consequences, particularly those that arise from actions not orchestrated by a central command, and that have an observable, patterned effect on the community.

[Source: Wikipedia)

QUERY

If the “invisible hand” and the laissez-faire doctrine of capitalism works well to stabilize industrial relations, is there still a need for government regulation?

P.D. No. 442 THE LABOR CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES A decree instituting a Labor Code, thereby revising and

consolidating labor and social laws, promote employment and human resources development and ensure industrial

peace based on social justice.

As amended:

PRESIDENTIAL DECREE Nos.

BATAS PAMBANSA Blg.

EXECUTIVE ORDER Nos.

REPUBLIC ACT Nos.

570-A, 626, 643, 823, 819, 849, 850, 865-A, 891, 1367, 1368, 1391, 1412, 1641, 1691, 1692, 1693, 1920, 1921

32, 70, 130, 227

47, 111, 126, 179, 180, 203, 247, 251, 252, 307, 797

6640, 6657, 6715, 6725, 6727, 7641, 7655, 7700, 7730, 7796, 8042, 8188, 8558, 9177, 9256, 9347, 9481

BIRTH OF THE LABOR CODE

Blas F. Ople – (1968) then Minister of Labor and is regarded as “Father of the Labor Code.

Effectivity: November 1, 1974

CLASSIFICATIONS OF LABOR LAWS (Legislations that govern capital and labor)

LABOR STANDARD

S LAW

LABOR RELATIONS

LAW

SOCIAL / WELFARE

LEGISLATIONS

Sets out the least/basic terms, conditions and

benefits of employment that ER’s must provide while the EE is at work

Benefits provided for the well-being of a segment of society in

furtherance of social justice and provides for the EE while he cannot work by reason of

sickness or other hazard

Defines the status, right and duties as well as the institutional mechanism

governing EE-ER interactions

Ex: min wage law 8-hr work law

COLA

Ex. Creation of grievance machinery

Unions

Ex. SSS law Agrarian Reform

Law (Arts. 7 to 11 of P.D. 442; now

governed by R.A. 6657 (CARP Law of

1988)

WHAT THE LABOR LAW ENCOMPASSES

STATUTES passed by the State to promote the welfare of workers and employees and regulate their relations with their employees

JUDICIAL DECISIONS applying and interpreting the aforesaid statutes

RULES AND REGULATIONS issued by the administrative agencies, within their legal competence, to implement labor statutes

FOUNDATION OF LABOR LAWS: Police Power

State legislatures may enact laws for the prosecution of the safety and health of employees as an exercise of their police power.

The right of every person to pursue a business, occupation or profession is subject to the paramount right of the government as a part of its police power to impose such restrictions and regulations as the protection of the public may require.

LAISSEZ FAIRE (DOCTRINE OF FREE

ENTERPRISE)

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

The aim, reason and justification of labor laws is SOCIAL JUSTICE

Dr. JOSE P. LAUREL (Calalang v Willams, 70 Phil 726 [1940])

SOCIAL JUSTICE is neither communism, nor despotism, not atomism nor anarchy, but the humanization of laws and the equalization of

social and economic forces by the State so that justice in its rational and objectively secular conception may at least be approximated.

SOCIAL JUSTICE means the promotion of the welfare of all the people, the adoption of the Government of measures calculated to insure

economic stability of all the components elements of society through the maintenance of proper economic equilibrium in the interrelations

of the members of the community, constitutionally, through the adoption of measures legally justifiable, or extra-constitutionally,

through the exercise of powers underlying the existence of all governments, on the time-honored principle of salus populi est

suprema lex.

CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS OF SOCIAL JUSTICE: ART XIII

SEC. 1. The Congress shall give highest priority to the enactment of measures that protect and enhance the right of all the people to human dignity, reduce social, economic and political inequalities, and remove cultural inequalities by equitably diffusing wealth and political power for the common good.

To this end, the State shall regulate the acquisition, ownership, use and disposition property and its increments.

SEC. 2. The promotion of social justice shall include the commitment to create economic opportunities based on freedom of initiative and self-reliance.

The aim, reason and justification of labor laws is SOCIAL JUSTICE

CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS OF THE LABOR CODE

The State affirms labor as a primary social economic force. It shall protect the rights of workers and promote their welfare.

RIGHTS OF WORKERS:

A. To organize themselves and collectively bargain

B. To engage in peaceful concerted activities (strike, picket, etc.)

C. To enjoy security of tenure

D. To work under humane conditions of work

E. To receive a living wage

F. To participate in policy and decision-making processes affecting their rights and benefits as may be provided by law

Ex. Department Order No. 1 (1988) which temporarily suspended deployment of female

domestic workers abroad

A petition was filed by an association of service exporters challenging the constitutional validity of the order because “it does not apply to ALL Filipino workers but only to domestic helpers and females with similar skills” and is violative of the right to travel.

RULING: The Court denied the petition. Based on police power, the State can legislate laws that may interfere with the personal liberty or property to promote the general welfare.

Even if the order pertains to female workers only, the same is not discriminatory since it is based on valid distinctions and applicable to all those belonging in the same class.

BALANCING THE INTERESTS OF EE & ER

While the Constitutional mandates have been dubbed as pro-labor, it does not mean that capital will not be protected.

“The State recognizes the indispensable role of the private sector, encourages private enterprise, and provides incentives to needed investments.

The State shall regulate the relations between workers and employers.

While labor is entitled to a just share in the fruits of production, the enterprise is also entitled to a reasonable return on investment, expansion and growth.

The State shall promote shared responsibility between ER & EE and voluntary modes of settling disputes

International Labor Organization (ILO)

The Philippines became a member on June 15, 1948 and subscribes to the following principles:

1. Labor is not a commodity

2. Freedom of expression and of association are essential to sustained progress

3. Poverty anywhere constitutes a danger to property everywhere

4. War against want requires to be carried on with unrelenting vigor within each nation, and by continuous and concerted international effort in which the representatives of workers and employers, enjoying equal status with those of governments (tripartite), join with them in free discussion and democratic decisions with a view to the promotion of the common welfare.

TRIPARTISM

Gov’t

EE’s

ILO

ER’s

CONSTRUCTION IN FAVOR OF LABOR

Art. 4: All doubts in the implementation of the provisions of the Code, including its implementing rules and guidelines, shall be resolved in favor of labor.

Reasons:

The ER stands on a higher footing because there is more supply of labor than capital and usually, the urgency of the need of the laborer gives him less bargaining choices.

EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS: THE CONCEPT

The ER-EE relations is contractual in nature and arises from the agreement of the parties, e.g., for one to render service to another in exchange for remuneration or compensation.

Such relationship is impressed with the public interest that labor contracts must yield to the common good [Civil Code, Art 1700].

Employment contracts are subject to laws on minimum standards of wages, hours of work, right to self-organization, CB, strikes, picketing and other collective actions.

GEN RULE: LABOR CODE APPLIES WHEN THERE IS EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONSHIP

There are three test commonly used to determine the existence of employer-employee relationship, viz.:

Four-fold test

Economic reality test

Two-tiered test (or Multi-factor test)

Source: http://www.laborlaw.usc-law.org/2009/08/06/tests-of-employment-relations/

EMPLOYER/EMPLOYEE DEFINED

EMPLOYER – one for whom employees work in consideration of wages or salaries; may be natural or juridical; includes any person acting for the interest of the ER

EMPLOYEE – one who works for an ER and received salary or wages for work rendered; any person in the service of another under a contract for hire, express or implied, oral or written; always a natural person

FOUR-FOLD TEST

Right to hire or to the selection and engagement of the employee.

Payment of wages and salaries for services.

Power of dismissal or the power to impose disciplinary actions.

Power to control the employee with respect to the output and the means and methods by which the work is to be accomplished. This is known as the right-of-control test.

FOUR-FOLD TEST

THE CONTROL TEST:

The power of control is the most crucial indication of the existence of the ER-EE relationship.

The existence of the power is what is required and not necessarily the actual exercise thereof. It is not essential for the ER to actually supervise the performance of duties of the EE; it is enough that the ER has the right to wield that power.

ER-EE RELATIONS EXIST IN THE FOLLOWING CASES:

Between drivers of public utility vehicles under the “boundary” system and their operators or owners of the jeepneys as they perform jobs usually necessary to the business of the employers

Between the university professor and the university they served

Between musicians providing the background music of a moving picture and the film company

Between janitors and the commercial school, even if the janitorial services were furnished by another where it appears that the person in charge of the school supervised the janitor and had control over the manner he performed the work

Between cargadores and pahinantes working in the glass factory who were loading and unloading , piling and palleting empty bottles from the company truck and warehouse

No ER-EE relations exist in the following cases:

Between an indirect employer and the independent contractor even if personal services are involved, since the latter is not under the control of the former except as to the result of the work

Between an industrial partner and the partnership

Between a farm worker who farms the agricultural land of the owner under a share-crop arrangement but not if the farmer is employed

Volunteer workers for religious, civic and community purposes whose reporting is not compulsary or controlled

Fishermen and crew aboard a fishing vessel paid on commission basis

Caddies are not employees of the golf clubs

Special cases when ER-EE relations was considered to exist:

Hospitality girls as entertainers working in cocktail lounges, disco houses and similar establishments have been considered employees of the person or establishment they serve.

This is for the protection of the said employees in line with social justice

Economic reality test

Under economic reality test, the benchmark in analyzing whether employment relation exists between the parties is the economic dependence of the worker on his employer. That is, whether the worker is dependent on the alleged employer for his continued employment in the latter’s line of business.

Applying this test, if the putative employee is economically dependent on putative employer for his continued employment in the latter’s line of business, there is employer-employee relationship between them. Otherwise, there is none.

Two-tiered test (or Multi-factor test)

The economic reality test is not meant to replace the right of control test. Rather, these two test are often use in conjunction with each other to determine the existence of employment relation between the parties. This is known as the two-tiered test, or multi-factor test. This two-tiered test involves the following tests:

The putative employer’s power to control the employee with respect to the means and methods by which the work is to be accomplished; and

The underlying economic realities of the activity or relationship.

EXCEPTION: When Labor Code applies even if there is no ER-EE relations

LIABILITY OF A CONTRACTOR, SUBCONTRACTOR OR INDIRECT EMPLOYER

Art. 106:xxx The employer shall be jointly and severally liable with his contractor or subcontractor to such employees to the extent of the work performed under the contract, in the same manner and extent that he is liable to employees directly employed by him.xxx

Art. 107: (Indirect employer) – same liability as given in Art 106

DEPT. ORDER No. 18-02

CONTRACTING/SUBCONTRACTING is an arrangement whereby a principal agrees to put out or farm out with a contractor or subcontractor the performance or completion of a specific job, work or service within a definite or predetermined period, regardless of whether such job, work or service is to be performed or completed within or outside the premises of the principal as hereafter qualified.

TYPES OF CONTRACTING/SUBCONTRACTING

LABOR-ONLY CONTRACTING JOB-CONTRACTING

Mere recruitment; finds and supplies people; contractor is pseudo-contractor only; regarded as just an agent of the principal

Requires completion/delivery of a job, work or service within a given period

Places recruits with principal and has no right to control the performance of the work of the recruits

Employs, supervises and pays the detailed recruits

Considered wrong and prohibited because it is an attempt to evade the obligations of an employer

Registered with the DOLE

Contractor does not have substantial capital or investment relating to the job to be performed and the recruits perform jobs directly related to the main business of the principal

Substantial capital or investment referring to capital stocks in the case of a corporations, tools, equipment, implements, machineries and work premises, actually and directly used by the contractor/subcontractor in the performance or completion of the job, work or service contracted.

JOB CONTRACTING: A Trilateral Relationship: Sec 3, Dept. Order No. 18, s 2002

Principal

Contractor

or Subcontractors

JC

Laborers

KINDS OF WORKERS/EMPLOYEES: Art 280

REGULAR EMPLOYEES

those who have been "engaged to perform activities which are usually necessary or desirable in the usual business or trade of the employer

PROJECT EMPLOYEES those "whose employment has been fixed for a specific project or undertaking, the completion or termination of which has been determined at the time of the engagement of the employee

SEASONAL EMPLOYEES

seasonal employees or those who work or perform services which are seasonal in nature, and the employment is for the duration of the season

CASUAL EMPLOYEES casual employees or those who are not regular, project, or seasonal employees provided that an employee who has rendered at least one year of service, whether continuous or broken, shall be considered regular with respect to the activity in which he or she is employed and his or her employment shall continue while the activity exists.

OTHER KINDS OF EMPLOYEES

FIXED-TERM EMPLOYEE

recognized in jurisprudence is “term” or “fixed-period employment.” This is based on art. 1193 of the CC, which states that obligations with a resolutory period take effect at once, but terminate upon arrival of the day certain – understood to be a day that must necessarily come. The decisive determinant in “term employment” should not be the activities that the employee is called upon to perform, but the day certain agreed upon by the parties for the commencement and termination of the employment relationship. Stipulations in employment contracts providing for “term employment” or “fixed-period employment” are valid when the period has been agreed upon knowingly and voluntarily by the parties, without force, duress or improper pressure exerted on the employee, and when such stipulations were not designed to circumvent the laws on security of tenure.

OTHER KINDS OF EMPLOYEES

PROBATIONARY EMPLOYEE

not necessarily a category of employment in the Philippines. It pertains to a period of time in which the employee is being observed and evaluated to determine whether or not he is qualified for permanent employment. Under art. 281 of the LC, probationary employment shall not exceed six months. An employee who is allowed to work after a probationary period shall be considered a regular employee. A probationary employee is, for a given period of time, under observation and evaluation to determine whether or not he or she is qualified for permanent employment. During the probationary period, the employer is given the opportunity to observe the skills, competence and attitude of the employee while the latter seeks to prove to the employer that he or she has the qualifications to meet the reasonable standards for permanent employment

REGULAR EMPLOYMENT

Regular employees are those who are hired for activities which are necessary or desirable in the usual trade or business of the employer.

Repeated rehiring and the continuing need for the employee’s services are sufficient evidence of the necessity and indispensability of the ee’s services to the er’s business or trade.

PROJECT EMPLOYMENT

Principal test:

(a) ee’s were assigned to carry out a specific project or undertaking (b) the duration or scope was specified at the time the ee’s were engaged for that project Sec 2.2 € & (f) of DOLe Dept. Order No. 19, s 1993, gives indicators of Project Employment: 1. duration of undertaking is reasonably determinable 2. such duration is made clear to the ee at time of hiring 3. the work performed by the ee is in connection with that particular undertaking 4. the ee, while not employed, is free to offer his services to another er 5. the termination of his employment is reported to the DOLE within 30 days after separation from work 6. an undertaking in the employment contract by the er to pay completion bonus to the project ee as practiced by most construction companies

PROJECT EMPLOYMENT

POLICY INSTRUCTION No. 20 (Governing Construction Industry), recognizes two kinds of ee’s

1. Purely project EE’s hired on project to project basis

A. Not entitled to separation pay if terminated as result of completion of project or phase thereof

B. No prior clearance for termination is necessary but terminations must be reported to DOLE

1. EE’s part of the construction corporations labor pool – EE’s are not free to offer their services to another while not at work

A. Regular

B. Probationary

SEASONAL EMPLOYMENT

Seasonal workers who work for more than one season for the same work are deemed to have acquired regular employment and will be considered “on leave” during off-season ,

CASUAL EMPLOYMENT

Irregular, unpredictable, sporadic and brief in nature and outside the usual business of the ER.

An EE who has rendered at least 1 yr of service, whether such service is continuous or broken, shall be considered a regular employee with respect to the activity in which he is employed and his employment shall continue while such activity exists.

Casual EE’s dismissed before expiration of 1 –yr period cannot claim illegal dismissal.

The status of regular employment attaches to the causal EE on the day immediately after the end of his first year of service

PROBATIONARY EMPLOYEES

Those generally hired for regular employement but are placed on a probationary status for a period of 6 months. Exceptions:

A. Learnership/apprentice period*

B. 3 yrs in case of teachers

C. When agreed period is longer/different due to nature of job or when ee failed to qualify or per company policy

The ee may become regular once he qualifies based on reasonable standards made known to him at the time of hiring.

The ee is considered regular if allowed to work beyond the probationary period.

Training period plus probationary period is circumvention.

LEARNERSHIP/APPRENTICESHIP

APPRENCTICESHIP LEARNERSHIP

ART 58 & 62 LC ART 73 LC

More than 3 months EE needs special skill

Not more than 3 months No need for special skill

Wage is 75% of minimum wage Wage is 75% of the min wage

Only in highly technical industries May only be hired if there are no experienced workers available, provided that: (a) employment of learners is necessary to prevent curtailment of employment opportunities and (b) it does not create unfair competition in terms of labor costs or impair labor standards

Qualifications: at least 14 yrs old; possesses vocational aptitude and capacity for appropriate tests; and possesses ability to comprehend and follow oral and written instructions

If already worked 2 months & terminated by ER before end of agreed period with no fault of EE, deemed regular

EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION AS TO RANK

Managerial – those vested with powers or prerogatives to lay down and execute managerial policies and/or to hire, transfer, suspend, lay-off, or recall EEs. They are not entitled to benefits relating to hours of work and other conditions of employment if:

A. Their primary duty consists of management

B. They customarily/regularly direct the work of two or more EE’s therein

C. They have the authority to hire or fire EEs of lower rank or their suggestions for hiring and firing carry great weight.

EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION AS TO RANK

Officers or members of a managerial staff–They are not entitled to benefits relating to hours of work and other conditions of employment if:

A. Their primary duty consists of work directly related to management policies

B. They customarily/regularly exercise discretion and independent judgment

C. They do not devote more than 20% of their hours of worked in a workweek to activities which are not directly and closely related to the performance of job in (a) and (b).

EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION AS TO RANK

SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES – Those who, in the interest of management, effectively recommend such managerial actions if the exercise of such authority is not merely routinary or clerical in nature but requires the use of independent judgment.

Deemed a member of the managerial staff

A foreman is a supervisor as the term”foreman” implies that the employee is the representative of management over the workers and the operation of the department.

EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION AS TO RANK

***The first two classifications , more often than not, are also considered “confidential employees” for purposes of self-organization and may not join the union of the rank-and-file.

RANK-AND-FILE EMPLOYEES - All other EEs not falling within the definition of “managerial” or “supervisory” employees are considered rank-and-file

ER-EE RELATIONS

CASES: 1. The Manila Hotel Corp v NLRC, 343 SCRA 1 [2000] 2. LVN Pictures v LVN Musician’s Guild, 1 SCRA 132 3. R.P. v SSS , G.R. No. 172101, 23 Nov 2007 4. Orozco v 5th Div of CA, 562 SCRA 36 [2008] 5. SSS vs CA, 348 SCRA 1 [2000] 6. Insular Life Assurance Co. Ltd v NLRC, G.R. No.

84484 7. Manila Golf Club Inc v IAC, 237 SCRA 207 8. Jardin et al v NLRC, 326 SCRA 299 [2000] 9. R. Transport Corp v Ejandra, G.R. No. 148508, 20

May 2004

ER-EE RELATIONS

CASES:

1o. Insular Life v NLRC, 179 SCRA 459 [1989]

11. Tongko v Manufarurer’s Life Assurance Co, G.R. No. 167622, 29 June 2010

12. Mafinco v Ople, 70 SCRA 139 [1976]

13. Tan v Lagrama, 387 SCRA 393 [2002]

14. Jose Sonza v ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corp, G.R. No. 138051, 431 SCRA 583 [2004]

15. Farley Fulache et al v ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corp, G.R. No. 183810, 610 SCRA 567 [2010]

JOB-CONTRACTING AND LABOR-ONLY CONTRACTING

CASES:

1. Coca-Cola Bottlers v Dela Cruz, G.R. No. 184977, 07 Dec 2009

2. Temic Automotive Phils v Temic Automotive Phils Inc Employees Union-FFW, G.R. No. 186965, 23 Dec 2009

3. Alviado et al v Procter & Gamble , G.R. No. 160506, 09 March 2010

4. Vinoya v NLRC, 324 SCRA 469 [2000]

5. Babas v Lorenzo Shipping Corp, G.R. No. 18609, 15 Dec 2010

6. San Miguel Corp v MAERC , 405 SCRA 579 [2003]

KINDS OF EMPLOYEES/EMPLOYMENT

CASES:

1. De Leon v NLRC, 176 SCAR 615 [2001]

2. Magsalin v Nat’l Organization of Working Men et al, G.R. No. 148492, 09 May 2003

3. Prudential Bank & Trust Co v Reyes, 352 SCRA 316 [2001]

4. Baguio Country Club v NLRC, 206 SCRA 643 [1992]

5. Int’l Catholic Migration Commission v NLRC, 169 SCRA 606 [1989}

6. Fr Pedro Escudero v Office of the President , 172 SCRA 783

7. Holiday Inn Manila v NLRC, 226 SCRA 417 [1993]

8. Robinsons Galleria v Ranchez, G.R. No. 177937, 19 Jan 2011

KINDS OF EMPLOYEES/EMPLOYMENT

CASES:

9. Woodbridge School v Pe Benito, 570 SCRA 164 [2008]

10. Lacuesta v Ateneo De Manila University, et al, 477 SCRA 217 [2005]

11. Paranaque v Austria, 538 SCRA 438 [2007]

12. Fabella v SMC, G.R. No. 150658, 09 Feb 2007

13. Hanjin Heavy Industries v Ibanez, 555 SCRA 537 [2008]

14. Cocomangas Hotel Beach Resort v Visca, 567 SCRA 269 [2008]

15. Abasolo et al v NLRC, 346 SCRA 293 [2000]

REFERENCES

Abad, Jr., Antonio H. (2011). (4th ed). Compendium on labor law. 4th ed. Manila: Rex.

Azucena, Jr. A. C. (2010). (7th ed.). The labor code with comments and cases. Manila: Rex.

Azucena, C.A., Jr. (2007). (5th ed.). Everyone's Labor Code. Manila:Rex.

Rex case digest. (2006). Labor law and social legislation, legal ethics, mercantile law. Quezon City: Rex.

Salao, Ernesto C. (2009). Law dictionary. Manila: Rex.