14
Introduction to Risk Analysis and Management IST C. Guedes Soares and Ângelo Teixeira Risk Analysis 2 Introduction Any plant or system should be designed and operated in such a way as to satisfy a given set of safety goals. This is a goal-oriented approach where goals are first specified, and then the plant is designed, constructed, operated and maintained accordingly. Risk Analysis 3 Introduction Risk Analysis 4 Accidents do happen

1 Introduction to risk analysis and Management - Copy · Introduction to Risk Analysis and Management IST C. Guedes Soares and Ângelo Teixeira Risk Analysis 2 Introduction Any plant

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Introduction to Risk Analysis and Management

IST

C. Guedes Soares and Ângelo Teixeira

Risk Analysis 2

Introduction

Any plant or system should be designed and operated in such a way asto satisfy a given set of safety goals.

This is a goal-oriented approach where goals are first specified, and thenthe plant is designed, constructed, operated and maintained accordingly.

Risk Analysis 3

Introduction

Risk Analysis 4

Accidents do happen

Risk Analysis 5

Introduction

Disasters and accidents have always occurred

Engineers make decisions in regard to activities associated withUncertainties:

Models are not preciseData are not sufficientNatural variabilityExperience is subjective

How to deal with uncertainties?

How safe is safe enough?

risk-based decision makingrisk-informed integrated decision making

Risk Analysis 6

What is uncertainty?

Definitions

“a general concept that reflects the lack of sureness about something, ranging from just a sort of complete sureness to an almost complete lack of conviction about an outcome” (Sayers et al., 2002)

http://www.floodrisknet.org.uk/glossary/uncertainty

“a situation in which an individual has incomplete information as to what is going to happen in the future

http://www.worldbank.org/hsr/class/module1/glossary.htm

Risk Analysis 7

What is uncertainty?

Definitions (cont.)

A potential deficiency in any phase or activity of the modeling process that is due to the lack of knowledge." (AIAA G-077-1998)

www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/wind/valid/tutorial/glossary.html

Uncertainty is an inevitable part of the assertion of knowledge: see Bayesian probability.

www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty

Risk Analysis 8

What is uncertainty?

Definitions (cont.)

“Uncertainty is that which disappears when we become certain”

“In practical scientific and engineering contexts, certainty is achieved through observations, and uncertainty is that which is removed by observations. Hence uncertainty is concerned with results of possible observations”

T. Bedford & R. Cooke (2001)

Risk Analysis 9

Types of uncertainties

Aleatory (or stochastic) uncertaintyVariability due to the nature of physical phenomena

Epistemic (or knowledge-based) uncertainty• uncertainty due to inadequate knowledge (model uncertainty)• statistical uncertainty (sparse information).

The knowledge-based uncertainty can be reduced by further study.The aleatory uncertainty, on the other hand, is by definition irreducible.

The variables and the parameters used in design and analysis are subjected either to:

Risk Analysis 10

Epistemic (or knowledge-based) uncertainty

Statistical uncertainty

The statistical uncertainties are associated with the statistical evaluation of results of tests or observations. They may result from:

Model uncertainty

arises from the fact that any model, conceptual or mathematical, willinevitably be a simplification of the reality it is designed to represent

• a limited number of observations or test results which cause uncertainties in the estimation of statistical parameters, e.g. mean and standard deviation,

• neglecting systematic variations of the observed variables e.g. of climate variables,

• neglecting possible correlations.

Risk Analysis 11

What is uncertainty?

Probability theory

Express uncertainty in terms of probability

Provides the basis for the assessment of numerical measures of the likelihood of the occurrence of uncertain events

Risk Analysis Reliability Analysis

Decision Analysis

(probabilities)

Risk Analysis 12

Bayesian or subjective interpretation

The probability assigned to A depends on the present knowledge about the occurrence of A, which can be updated by further knowledge.

degree of belief ≠ degree of truth

A of occurence in the ,individualon of belief, of degree)( AP

The subjective interpretation of probability is widely applied in risk analysis

Based on this interpretation the probability P(A) of the event A is formulated as a degree of belief that A will occur:

Risk Analysis 13

Risk and Safety in Engineering

Risk assessment, within the framework of decision analysis, providesa basis for rational decision making subject to uncertain and / orincomplete information

Thereby we can take into account, in a consistent manner, the prevailinguncertainties and quantify their effect on risks

Thus we may find answers to the following questions:

- How large is the risk associated with a given activity ?- How may we reduce and / or mitigate risks ?- How much does it cost to reduce and / or mitigate risks ?- What risks must we accept – what can we afford ?

Risk Analysis 14

Risk analysis is defined as a systematic approach to the identification,analysis and evaluation of factors that may lead to accidents. (It alsofrequently includes the generation of proposals for increasing levels ofsafety).

The main objective of a risk analysis is to achieve a risk level reduction.

Main components of a Risk assessment are

• Risk identification ;

• Risk analysis;

• Risk evaluation:

Risk assessment

Risk Analysis 15

Definition of Risk

Risk is a characteristic of an activity relating to all possible events nE

which may follow as a result of the activity

The risk contribution RiskEi from the event Ei is defined through the productbetween

- the Event probability PEi

- the Consequences of the event CEi

The Risk associated with a given activity RA may then be written as

EventCosteConsequenc

TimeEEventobability

TimeCostRisk i

Ei Pr

(The risk is an expected cost per unit time)

Ei

n

iA RiskR

Ei

1

Risk Analysis 16

Individual risk (fatality risk in occupational accidents in Portugal per year)

Since there are in average 250 fatalities in occupational accidents per year in Portugal in a population of 10 million

yearpersonfatality

personyear

.105.2

1010/accident aloccupation infatality 250 5

6

Example 1:

Risk Analysis 17

-90 000 road accidents per year in Portugal,

- In average 450 million Euros are spent in human and material damages

- 1 million cars circulating in Portugal

Annual frequency of accidentyearcar

accidentcar

yearaccident

09.0101

/000906

Consequence of a car accidentaccidentEuro

accidentEuro 5000

0009010450 6

yearcarEuro

accidentEuro

yearcaraccidentRisk

450500009.0

Example 2:

Risk Analysis 18

-250 000 occupational accidents in Portugal per year,

- 300 million Euros are spent annually in occupational accidents in Portugal per year

- Workforce: 4,6 million people

yearaccidentyearaccident

.worker0.054

Worker106.4/000250

6

accidentEuro

accidentEuro 1200

00025010300 6

yearEuro

accidentEuro

yearaccidentRisk

.worker651200

.worker054.0

Example 3:

Annual frequency of accident

Consequence of an accident

Risk Analysis 19 Risk Analysis 20

Types of Risk in Public Activities

Individual Risks: Risks that affect individuals such as death, disabilities,deficiences and illness

Social Risks : Risks that affect groups of persons that live in a region orhave any common activity such as work or transportation.

Environmental Risks : Risks that are reflected in damages to the environment

Different types of risks have different type of acceptance criteria

Risk Analysis 21

Public Perception of Risk

Potencial for catastrophes

Risk for future generations,

Familiarity with the risk

Potencial for irreversible effects

Lack of personal control

Local cultural values

Public Perception of Risk reflects the attitute of the general public towards acceptance of different kind of risks

Public Perception of Risk often does not coincide with the real risk levels

Public Perception of Risk depends on

Risk Analysis 22

Risk description

Risk depends on the probability of occurrence of an accidental event and of its consequences

Risk depends on time as both probability and consequences can depend on time. Therefore it is specified with reference to a specific period of time

When consequences are losses of live risk is often substituted by the probability of loss of live or when they are multiple, by the expected number of lives lost

Risk acceptance levels are required for decision making

Risks can be described at different level of detail

Risk Analysis 23

Examples of Different risk Levels

Risk of death in Portugal, 1994

Risk of death due to all causes and external causes(Source: Direcção Geral da Saúde, Estatísticas de mortalidade).

0

0,002

0,004

0,006

0,008

0,01

0,012

HM H M

Sex

Risk

of D

eath

All causesExternal causes

Risk Analysis 24

Individual risk of deathUK 1980-84.

(Source: Fernandes - Russel, 1987a) Population at risk: all population of UK

Individual Risk / year

(all ages) All causes 10-2 All internal causes 10-2 All external causes (accidents, violence, poisoning...)

10-4

All accidents 10-4 All industrial accidents 10-5

Individual Risk

Risk Analysis 25

Main causes of death in Portugal, 1995 (Source: INE)

A – AVC occurrencesB - TumorsC – Heart deseasesD – Ill defined symtoms E - AccidentsF - Other causes of death

22.6

19.3

16.5

11.4

6.1

17

0

5

10

15

20

25

A B D D E F

Causes of death

% o

f dea

ths

Risk Analysis 26

Comparing individual risk of death due to internal and external causesUK1980-84. (Source: Fernandes - Russel, 1987a)

Individual risk / year INTERNAL CAUSES Boold circulation system 5800 x10-6 Neoplasms 2700 x10-6 Breathing system 1600 x10-6 Digestion system 300 x10-6 EXTERNAL CAUSAS Accidents in motor vehicle 100 x10-6 Acidental falls 90 x10-6 Suicides 90 x10-6

Individual Risk

Risk Analysis 27

Comparing individual risk of death due to selected causesUK1980-84. (Source: Fernandes - Russel, 1987a)

Individual risk / year Lightnings 0.1 x10-6 Medical accidents 0.9 x10-6 Air transportation 1.2 x10-6 Accidental poisoning 13.1 x10-6 Accidents in motor vehicles 101.0 x10-6

Individual Risk

Risk Analysis 28

Work accidents in Portugal (1990-2000)

Nº Total de Acidentes de Trabalho 1989-2000

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

Ano

Nº T

otal

de

Aci

dent

es

0

0,01

0,02

0,03

0,04

0,05

0,06

0,07

Frequência

Nº Total de Acidentes de Trabalho Frequência

Risk Analysis 29

Deadly work acidents in Portugal

Nº Total de Acidentes Mortais de Trabalho (1989-2000)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

Ano

Nº T

otal

de

Aci

dent

es

Mor

tais

de

Trab

alho

0,0E+001,0E-052,0E-053,0E-054,0E-055,0E-056,0E-057,0E-058,0E-059,0E-05

Frequência

Nº Total de Acidentes Mortais Frequência

Risk Analysis 30

Deadly work acidents in Portugal by activity (2000)

Actividades: Acidentes de Trabalho Mortais

Número Total Agricultura/Pecuária 18

Silv./Explor./Flor. 4 Pesca 5

Extr. Min. Não Metálicos 5 Indústria Alim./Beb./Tabaco 10

Indústria Têxtil 2 Indústria Vestuário/Confecção 1

Indústria Calçado 1 Indústria Madeiras/Cortiça 8

Indústria Papel 4 Indústria Química 6

Indústria Por./Olaria/Vidro 2 Indústria Cerâmica 13

Indústria Metalúrgica de Base 3 Indústria Prod. Met. Mat. Eléctr. 7

Outras Ind. Transformadoras 3 Electricidade/Gás/Água 3

Construção Civil 132 Com. Rep. Auto 1

Com. Grosso 9 Com. Retalho 5

Indústria Hoteleira 2 Transp./Armazenagem 15

Comunicações 5 Bancos 3

Serviços Prestados Empresas 12 Serviços Sociais 4

Serviços Saneamento/Limpeza 2 Serviços Recreat./Culturais 2

TOTAIS 287

Risk Analysis 31

Deadly work acidents in Portugal by activity (2000)

Indústrias Transformadoras

38%

Construcção23%

Com. Gr/Ret. Rep V. Auto Moto

14%

Agricutura, Silvicultura e Pesca

3%

Transportes, rmazenagem e

Comunicações4%

Outras6%

Outros Serv. Coilectividade, Sociais

e Pessoais2%

Alojamento e Restauração

4%

Adm. Publ. Defesa e Seg. Social

2%

Activ. Imob. Alug. Serv. Pr. Emp.

4%

Risk Analysis 32

Frequency of Fatal Accidents in Coal minesUK 1949-1987

Individual Risk

Risk Analysis 33

Deadly work accidents in selected industriesUK1980-84. (Source: Fernandes - Russel, 1987a)

Population at risk: Total employees in each industry

Individual risk / year Professional services 1 x10-6 Electrical engineering 6 x10-6 Paper industry 11 x10-6 Chemical industry 19 x10-6 Transportation 33 x10-6 Metalurgical industry 76 x10-6 Building industry 102 x10-6 Minning industry 179 x10-6 Quarry industry 390 x10-6 Deep sea fishing 880 x10-6 Average all industries 22 x10-6

Individual Risk

Risk Analysis 34

a. Sleeping time b. At home washing, dressing...c. Driving to workd. Daily working timee. Lunch breakf. Using motorcycleg. Hobbies

Daily risk

Risk Analysis 35

Frequency of road accidents compared with accidents in Chemical and Petrochemical Industries in UK

Road Accidents Nº of accidents with x deaths

Accidents in Chemical and Petrochemical Industries

Year

1 2 3 4+ 1 2 3 4 15 1981 4969 306 61 19 1 0 0 0 0 1982 5056 320 54 17 1 1 0 0 0 1983 4691 278 39 19 3 1 0 1 0 1984 4789 274 51 24 2 2 1 0 1 1985 4456 261 33 18 2 1 0 0 0

Individual and Social Risk

Risk Analysis 36

Social Risk (F-N Curves)

1967-2001

Risk Analysis 37

Social Risk (F-N Curves)

Risk Analysis 38

Social Risk (F-N Curves)

Risk Analysis 39

Definição de RiscoRisk Acceptance (Qualitative) Example

Risk Analysis 40

Risk Acceptance (Qualitative) Example

Risk matrix (ex: BS 8800:2004)

Con

sequ

ence

1

2

3

4

5

1 2 3 4 5

Acceptable

Not acceptable

Likelihood / Frequency

Risk Analysis 41

A – Car accident

Freq. = 4, Cons. = 3

B – Aviation accident

Freq. = 1, Cons. = 5

A

B

Risk Acceptance (Qualitative) Example

Con

sequ

ence

1

2

3

4

5

1 2 3 4 5

Not acceptable

Likelihood / Frequency

Acceptable

Risk Analysis 42

Risk Analysis 43

Risk Management Process

Risk management process involves applying logical and systematic methods for:

- identifying, analyzing, evaluating and treating risk associated with any activity, process, function, project, product, service or asset;

- monitoring and reviewing risk

Risk Analysis 44

select one or more options for modifying risks, and implementing those options.

Risk identification

Risk Analysis

Is the risk level

tolerable?

Risk treatment

No

Yesmaintaining existing risk controls

Risk evaluation

Risk Management Process

Define likelihoods and consequences(qualitative, semi-quantitative or quantitative)

Risk Analysis 45

Risk Management Process (ISO 31000)

Risk Analysis 46

Risk assessment is the overall process of:risk identification, risk analysis and risk evaluation.

Risk assessment

identifying sources of risk, areas of impacts, events and their causes and their potential consequences

The aim of this step is to generate a comprehensive list of risks

Risk identification tools and techniques which are suited to its objectives and capabilities, and to the risks faced should be applied

Risk identification

Risk Analysis 47

Risk assessment

Risk analysis is about developing an understanding of the risk

Risk analysis involves consideration of the causes and sources of risk, their positive and negative consequences, and the likelihood that those consequences can occur.

Risk analysis can be undertaken with varying degrees of detail depending on the risk, the purpose of the analysis, and the information, data and resources available.

Analysis can be qualitative, semi-quantitative or quantitative, or a combination of these, depending on the circumstances.

In practice, qualitative analysis is often used first to obtain a general indication of the level of risk and to reveal the major risks.

When possible and appropriate, one should undertake more specific and quantitative analysis of the risks as a following step.

Risk Analysis

Risk Analysis 48

Risk assessment

The purpose of risk evaluation is to assist in making decisions, based on the outcomes of risk analysis, about which risks need treatment to prioritize treatment implementation.

Risk evaluation involves comparing the level of risk found during the analysis process with risk criteria established when the context was considered.

If the level of risk does not meet risk criteria, the risk should be treated.

In some circumstances, the risk evaluation can lead to a decision to undertake further analysis.

The risk evaluation can also lead to a decision not to treat the risk in any way other than maintaining existing risk controls.

Risk evaluation

Risk Analysis 49

Risk treatment

Risk treatment involves selecting one or more options for modifying risks, and implementing those options.

Risk treatment involves a cyclical process of assessing a risk treatment; deciding whether residual risk levels are tolerable or not; if not tolerable generating a new risk treatment; and assessing the effect of that treatment until the residual risk reached complies with the organization’s risk criteria.

Risk treatment options can include the following:- avoiding the risk by deciding not to start or continue with the activity that gives rise to the risk;- seeking an opportunity by deciding to start or continue with an activity likely to create or enhance the risk;- removing the source of the risk;- changing the nature and magnitude of likelihood;- changing the consequences;- sharing the risk with another party or parties; and- retaining the risk by choice.

Risk Analysis 50

The risk analysis is applied to study proposed facilities and procedures thatcan create dangers or operation flaws. The situations where this type ofanalysis is more appropriate are:

• When the plan of the facility is being perform;

• When it begins to give a concrete form to safety's objectives;

• During the assessment and proposed measures;

• On final inspection;

• During the initial period of operation.

Risk analysis

Risk Analysis 51

An risk analysis can supply information to improve safety's conditions,considering variables as the total cost, materials, personnel and availableequipments, etc.

The risk analysis can be applied as support to decision, allowing theassessment of risks of alternative solutions.

Risk analysis

Risk Analysis 52

There are many different methods of risk analysis.

In general, it can be said that any one specific method will only cover alimited part of the risk panorama.

Analysis from a technical perspective,

Man-Machine interaction,

Analysis of the organization.

The methods are classified as follows:

Therefore, it is useful that a analysis doesn’t restrain herself to just onemethod.

Methods of Risk Analysis

Risk Analysis 53 Risk Analysis 54