59
1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

1

Introduction to the

Next Generation Science Standards

November 12, 2012

Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D.CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

Page 2: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

2

Welcome!

… to the CESA #2 workshop on the Next Generation Science Standards.

Take 3.14 minutes to introduce yourself at your table and discuss:1) Your comfort level with the NGSS (from “no

idea” to “I’m already aligned”) 2) Your goals for today’s meeting3) Person with nearest b-day will share out

Page 3: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

3

• Becoming more familiar and comfortable with the NGSS

• Connecting curriculum and instruction to the science and engineering practices

• Connecting curriculum and instruction ideas within the nature of science

• Becoming more able to integrate engineering design principles in science lessons

• Exploring possible assessments for the NGSS

Some goals for the day include:

Page 4: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

4

• Meeting norms• Overview of the day

NGSS background and structure NGSS practices Integrating practices – example 1 Nature of science Integrating practices – example 2 NGSS assessments Next steps

Norms and Agenda

Page 5: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

5

What are we building upon?

Page 6: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

6

A-Science ConnectionsB-Nature of ScienceC-Science InquiryD-Physical ScienceE-Earth and Space ScienceF-Life and Environmental ScienceG-Science ApplicationsH-Science in Personal and Social Perspectives

You’ve probably seen this A-H list.

Page 7: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

7

Research on learning has moved Forward.

Page 8: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

8

What helps you learn?

Page 9: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

9

Connect to prior knowledge.

Page 10: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

10

Build an explicit context

Page 11: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

11

Emphasize concepts over facts

Page 12: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

12

Reflect on your learning

Page 13: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

13

Research grew into a framework.

Page 14: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

14

The framework guides the NGSS.

“90% of what is in the Framework will be in the NGSS”--Stephen Pruitt

Page 15: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

15

The standards integrate 3 dimensions.

Page 16: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

16

• Share at your table (3 min).• Each table will be assigned one practice.• On chart paper:

• What does it not look like?• What does it look like (examples)?• Put it in your own words.

Without referring to any resource, what would you say are the key things you want students to learnin your class?

Page 17: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

17

• Post your chart paper. • Take a few minutes and walk around to see

what other groups put down – gallery walk.

Let’s share out our ideas on the practices.

Page 18: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

18

7 Crosscutting concepts:1. Patterns2. Cause and effect: Mechanism and explanation3. Scale, proportion, and quantity4. Systems and system models5. Energy and matter: Flow, cycles, and

conservation6. Structure and function7. Stability and change

Why is it useful to have overarchingthemes in the science we teach K-12?

Page 19: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

19

Break

Page 20: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

20

The standards have more focused content.

Page 21: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

21

Standards have a consistent format.

Page 22: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

22

• Handout and materials• Write ideas and answers in your “notebook.”

Sample activity – what might teaching one of these standards look like?

Page 23: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

23

• Handout…

How would you incorporate engineering?

Page 24: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

24

• What connections to science and engineering practices are there and how could you connect to others?

• What crosscutting concepts are there and how can you make them explicit?

• Are there other content areas you might connect to?

How could we improve this assignment?

Page 25: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

25

• Addition of explicit “Nature of Science” boxes• Better integration of engineering design ideas

into the performance expectations.• Fewer performance expectations. • Supporting documents:

• Course pathways for MS and HS.• Storylines-paragraphs describing an individual

grade science flow• College and career readiness

What’s changing for the second draft of the standards?

Page 26: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

26

• Jigsaw – number off from 1 to 5 (or 6)1) Intro and Scientific World View (p. 1 – 2)2) Scientific Inquiry (to Science Explains, p. 2 – mid

4)3) Scientific Inquiry (second half, p. mid 4 – 5)4) Scientific Enterprise (to There are Generally

Accepted…, p. 5 – mid 7)5) There are Generally Accepted to end (p. mid 7 to

end). 6) Google – myths of the nature of science by

McComas – skim it!

What does it mean when someonetalks about the nature of science?

Page 27: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

27

K.WCScientific Investigations Use a Variety of Methods to Produce New Knowledge • Science uses different ways to study the

world.

Sample nature of science statements from the 2nd draft

Page 28: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

28

1.SFIPScience is a Human Endeavor Influenced by Context, Society, and Culture • People have practiced science for a long

time. (SFIP.f) • Men and women are scientists and engineers.

(SFIP.f)

Sample nature of science statements from the 2nd draft

Page 29: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

29

4.IVTScientific Knowledge is Based on Empirical Evidence • Science findings are based upon locating

patterns in measurements and observations. (IVT.a)

Sample nature of science statements from the 2nd draft

Page 30: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

30

MS.CRScience uses models, mechanisms, theories, and laws to explain natural systems • Science knowledge is presented in different

forms such as hypotheses, theories, and laws. (CR.a)

Sample nature of science statements from the 2nd draft

Page 31: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

31

MS.IREScience is Limited, it Cannot Answer All Questions • Scientific knowledge is constrained by human

capacities and technologies. (IRE.g) • Science limits its explanations to systems that

lend themselves to observation and empirical evidence. (IRE.g)

Sample nature of science statements from the 2nd draft

Page 32: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

32

HS.MEOEScience Findings are Tentative and Subject to Revision • Science theories are subject to revision when

new evidence or new models emerge. (MEOE.h)

• Most scientific knowledge is quite durable, but is, in principle, subject to change based on new evidence. (MEOE.h)

Sample nature of science statements from the 2nd draft

Page 33: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

33

Lunch

Page 34: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

34

4.ESP Earth’s Surface Processes Students use the information gained in 2.ESP to further develop their understanding of the processes that shape Earth. They investigate the effect of wind, water, living organisms, and gravity on the rate of weathering and erosion and the resulting impact on Earth’s surface. They use rock formation and rock layers to explain how Earth’s surface has changed over time. They collaborate to design, test, and refine solutions to mitigate the impact of weathering and erosion on physical features in their local areas. Through analysis of maps, they use patterns to determine the likelihood of geological hazards (e.g., volcanoes, earthquakes) occurring in different locations and evaluate the possible consequences to organisms in those areas. Recognizing that humans cannot eliminate these hazards, they construct and test research-based solutions designed to mitigate the effects.

Storylines - example

Page 35: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

35

What is engineering?

Page 36: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

36

A Google search of engineers…

Page 37: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

37

A Google search of scientists…

Page 38: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

38

People are confused about engineering.

Page 39: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

39

People are confused about engineering.

Page 40: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

40

People are confused about engineering.

Page 41: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

41

There are many types of engineering.

• Biomedical Engineering • Chemical and Biological Engineering • Civil and Environmental Engineering • Engineering Professional Development• Geological Engineering• Materials Science and Engineering• Limnology and Marine Science Program• Industrial and Systems Engineering • Materials Science Program• Engineering Physics (e.g., Nuclear)• Electrical and Computer Engineering • Mechanical Engineering• Biological Systems Engineering

Page 42: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

42

In Wisconsin, you can get an “engineering” degree at:

• UW-Madison

• UW-Platteville

• UW-Milwaukee

• Milwaukee School of Engineering

• Marquette

Page 43: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

43

How do engineers define their profession?

• “In general… there is usually [a client who] comes to us with a problem…, an issue that needs to be dealt with.”

• “I think an engineer is really just a problem solver. Someone who can look at a situation objectively and use their knowledge and skills to brainstorm solutions.”

• “It’s not just designing of products eight hours a day.  That’s a couple weeks of a six month or one year project.  The rest of it you are spending developing,… writing specifications [and] detailing the products.”

Page 44: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

44

How does the NGSS differentiate science and engineering practices?

• Ask questions

• Develop/use models

• Plan/execute investigations

• Analyze/interpret data

• Use math and science knowledge

• Construct explanations

• Engage in argument from evidence

• Obtain, evaluate, communicate

Scientists: Engineers:

• Define problems

• Develop/use models

• Plan/execute investigations

• Analyze/interpret data

• Use math and science knowledge

• Design Solutions

• Engage in argument from evidence

• Obtain, evaluate, communicate

Page 45: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

45

Understanding the natural world vs. creating the human-made world

• A chemist may work to determine the chemical composition and structure of a natural compound

• A chemical engineer may then use the understanding provided by the chemist to develop a manufacturing process based on that substance for a new product. It might be a medication, an adhesive, a material with particular electrical properties……

Page 46: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

46

How do “engineering” activities oftenfall short?

Example #1 – Society of Women Engineers

Page 47: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

47

How do “engineering” activities oftenfall short?

Example #2 – NC DOT

Page 48: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

48

What is often missing from engineeringactivities?

• Iterative design process, refinement of design

• Societal context• Application of math and science

concepts• Collaborative activities instead of

competition

Page 49: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

49

Engineering DesignCycle

IDENTIFY PROBLEM

BRAINSTORM

DESIGN

BUILD

TESTEVALUATE

REDESIGN

SHARE SOLUTION

Page 50: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

50

Break

Page 51: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

51

How can we better integrate engineering practices into a common activity?

• Task: building rollercoasters!• Brainstorm: how do we or could we

integrate the science and engineering practices and crosscutting concepts?

• You design/re-design the activity.

• Share out ideas by group.

Page 52: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

52

What might science assessmentslook like for the NGSS?

http://nationsreportcard.gov/science_2009/

Explore! Share what you notice at your table.

Page 53: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

On June 1, a fast growing species of algae is accidentally introduced into a lake in a city park. It starts to grow and cover the surface of the lake in such a way that the area covered by the algae doubles every day. If it continues to grow unabated, the lake will be totally covered and the fish in the lake will suffocate. At the rate it is growing, this will happen on June 30.

a. When will the lake be covered half-way?b. On June 26, a pedestrian who walks by the lake every day warns that the lake

will be completely covered soon. Her friend just laughs. Why might her friend be skeptical of the warning?

c. On June 29, a clean-up crew arrives at the lake and removes almost all of the algae. When they are done, only 1% of the surface is covered with algae. How well does this solve the problem of the algae in the lake?

d. Write an equation that represents the percentage of the surface area of the lake that is covered in algae as a function of time (in days) that passes since the algae was introduced into the lake.

e. Using the available data, construct an argument that supports or refutes the problem’s claim that the fish will suffocate if the algae species is allowed to grow unabated. Your argument should include a discussion regarding resource availability and other environmental factors specifically including competition for resources.

f. Given the disturbance created by the algae, design a solution to ensure the stability of the lake ecosystem. Be sure to include claims with supporting evidence as to the time needed to return the lake to a stable state and an analysis of the impact of human intervention on the ecosystem.

Page 54: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

54

Science and Engineering PracticesEngaging in Argument from EvidenceEngaging in argument from evidence in 9-12 builds from K-8 experiences and progresses to using appropriate and sufficient evidence and scientific reasoning to defend and critique claims and explanations about the natural and designed world. Arguments may also come from current scientific or historical episodes in science.Construct a counter-argument that is based in data and evidence that challenges another proposed argument.Evaluate the claims, evidence, and reasoning of currently accepted explanations or solutions as a basis for the merits of arguments.

In this case,•A mathematical model to coherently support the claim•The model must be reliable and thoroughly explained

Disciplinary Core IdeasLS2.C: Ecosystem Dynamics, Functioning, and ResilienceIf a modest biological or physical disturbance to an ecosystem occurs, it may return to its more or less original status (i.e., the ecosystem is resilient), as opposed to becoming a very different ecosystem.Extreme fluctuations in conditions or the size of any population, however, can challenge the functioning of ecosystems in terms of resources and habitat availability. In this case,•Students should examine the competitive relationship between the fish and algae. •Students should explain how the increase in algaae population affects the oxygen levels in the water. •The argument should explain hypothesis and supporting evidence regarding the recovery of the ecosystem and the effect of leabing 1% of the algae in the lake.

Crosscutting ConceptsStability and ChangeMuch of science deals with constructing explanations of how things change and how they remain stable. Change and rates of change can be quantified and modeled over very short or very long periods of time. Some system changes are irreversible. Feedback (negative or positive) can stabilize or destabilize a system. Systems can be designed for greater or lesser stability.

In this case,•Students are able to develop arguments that lead to the stability of the ecosystem. The argument and content should address the feedback mechanisms of the ecosystem as well as the rates of change

Students who demonstrate understanding can:Construct arguments from evidence about the effects of natural biological or physical disturbances in terms of the time needed to reestablish a stable ecosystem and how the new system differs from the original system. [Clarification Statement: Computational models could be used to support collect evidence to support the argument.]

Page 55: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

55

• Write out your goals relative to the Next Generation Science Standards for the remainder of this school year.

Consider: Who will help you accomplish these goals? What resources might you need?

Discuss as a group.

Next Steps in NGSS

Page 56: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

56

• What is the first thing groups often do with new standards?

• Sense of wonder, practices, more important than content coverage (video)!

Standards-based vs. standards-referenced

Page 57: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

57

Review the Day - Key Learning• Becoming more familiar and comfortable

with the NGSS• Connecting curriculum and instruction to

the science and engineering practices• Connecting curriculum and instruction

ideas within the nature of science• Becoming more able to integrate

engineering design principles in science lessons

• Exploring possible assessments for the NGSS

Page 58: 1 Introduction to the Next Generation Science Standards November 12, 2012 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant

58

Evaluation

Please give me some feedback on this workshop and let me know what will be helpful moving forward – (tubes?)

Email me any time:[email protected]

http://www.cesa2.k12.wi.us/programs/stem/

http://www.nextgenscience.org