Upload
millicent-logan
View
217
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
IT and Telecom Sector Analysis
2
Overall Project Objectives
Adopt a baseline of NYC economic forecasts prior to September 11
Assess economic impact of September 11 attack on all key industries and sectors of city economy in short- and long-term
• Specific focus on lower Manhattan and New York City
Identify priorities to accelerate New York’s recovery
A.T. Kearney, Bain & Company, Booz-Allen & Hamilton, The Boston Consulting Group, KPMG, McKinsey & Company, and PricewaterhouseCoopers are collaborating in this unprecedented effort by addressing the Energy, Financial Services, Healthcare/Biotech, Insurance, IT/Telecom, Manufacturing, Media/Entertainment, Non-profit, Professional Services, Real Estate, Retail, Small Businesses, and Transport/Tourism sectors
3
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
NYC Snapshot
Pre-9/11 Baseline
Impact Assessment
Actions
Methodology and Assumptions
Appendices
4
Executive Summary
5
The events of 9/11 modestly impacted the technology sector– recommended actions can help the sector support an overall economic turnaround The impact of the attacks on the sector was small--the expected return to growth for the technology sector is delayed by
6-12 months• Pre 9/11, slowing revenue growth was expected to reverse by early 2002 – new estimates show a return in 2003• Traditional IT and telecom heavy spenders (e.g., Financial Services, Media) expect to continue spending reductions
in 2002
Infrastructure rebuilding and repair help the sector turn around as companies replace damaged equipment with upgraded technology standards where possible
• Carriers (e.g., Verizon, Sprint, AT&T) suffered capital losses, and should seek to hasten the recovery through advanced technology rollout and increased capacity for redundancy in the New York area
• IT infrastructure providers can use rebuilding/repair activities as an opportunity to help clients upgrade the capabilities of their pre 9/11 infrastructure
In the short term, the sector can work together with the business community to address critical post-9/11 concerns including data and system security, redundancy, and survivability
• Companies have become more cognizant of system and data backup/redundancy issues and expect to spend more on these services in the future
• Products and services provided by the technology sector companies can address many of these concerns
For the long term, the sector needs to work together to build a truly redundant and distributed infrastructure for New York and for the country
• Rebuilding the technology sector and improving the overall technology infrastructure for business in NYC• Establish mechanisms for ongoing demand- and supply-side cooperation to ensure requirements are met • Preserve the entrepreneurial influence by supporting small businesses• Provide an environment that fosters innovation and competition within the technology sector
6
Understanding the nature of the impact, we developed four imperatives and associated actions to mitigate the effects
Accelerate restoration of communications infrastructure• Reimburse/finance rebuilding of damaged infrastructure• Leverage opportunities to deploy “leapfrogging” technologies
Build the broadband infrastructure to support multiple centers of business around New York City (e.g., Lower Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, Upper Manhattan)
Imperatives Key Actions
Create industry-specific demand-side and supply-side consortia (e.g., Financial Services, Communications Services)
• Develop current and future industry-wide infrastructure requirements (e.g., redundancy, availability, capacity) and the plans to implement
• Establish clear communication of priorities to suppliers (equipment and services)• Coordinate new technology implementation efforts (e.g., mesh networks, 3G, etc)
among multiple service providers• Leverage existing industry consortia to extent possible (e.g., SIAC)
Establish new business development zone(s) throughout NYC• Identify and prioritize prospective areas for development• Deploy advanced technology infrastructure, targeted toward small-business
requirements
Establish industry-wide commitment to develop innovative technologies• Channel greater investment to new technologies enabling new business platforms• Provide public sector support where possible to encourage development and
deployment of new technologies (e.g., 3G, 802.11b, mesh networks)
Rebuild World-Class Infrastructure
Collaborate for the Future
Make NYC Better for Small Business
Nurture Innovation and Foster Competition
7
4.4
21.8
42,406 488
361,516
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Revenue* Jobs Companies
Hardware Services
Pre-attack, the IT and Telecom sector generated $37.8B* and employed nearly 97,000 people throughout New York City
4.215,667
414
1,50629
6.735,694
731
0.6
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Revenue Jobs Companies
Software Hardware Services
1,17452,867$11.6B 52443,922$26.2B*
Information TechnologyRevenue, Jobs, and Companies (2000)
TelecommunicationsRevenue, Jobs, and Companies (2000)
*Note: Only includes revenues generated in New York City. Verizon generates an additional $61B outside of New York CitySource: Dunn & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis
8
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Software Services Hardware
On an annual basis, the IT and Telecom sectors generally showed declining growth prior to 9/11
Ann
ual I
T R
even
ue G
row
th
Ann
ual T
elec
om R
even
ue G
row
th (
%)
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Telecom Hardware Voice
Data Wireless
IT IndustryPre-9/11 Projected Annual Growth
Telecom IndustryPre-9/11 Projected Annual Growth
New technology purchases drive the IT Hardware market, creating greater sensitivity to slowing corporate IT spend and a general economic downturn
Outsourcing, maintenance, and other short-term fixed IT spend areas support the service sector, limiting its exposure to economic downturns
Emphasis on security systems (e.g., virus protection, intruder detection) drove any software growth in 2000-2001
Decreased growth in wireless and data was expected as penetration increased
Local voice maket expected to remain flat, with long distance services seeing declines due to price competition
Hardware will experience a rebound with the roll out of new technologies such as 3G and 802.11b
Source: IDC, Gartner Group, Economy.com, BAH Analysis
9
In addition, industries that are historically large consumers of IT and Telecom (e.g., Financial Services) were reducing their spending levels
ObservationsObservations
Technology has become an integral part of business operations and firms have to spend on technology upgrade and maintenance every year
Reduction in spending as percentage of revenue is offset by overall increasing corporate revenues
Slower growth is driving down stock prices, however long-term forecasts indicate double-digit growth
Potential risk in New York City market as key local industries plan to reduce technology spend
Technology has become an integral part of business operations and firms have to spend on technology upgrade and maintenance every year
Reduction in spending as percentage of revenue is offset by overall increasing corporate revenues
Slower growth is driving down stock prices, however long-term forecasts indicate double-digit growth
Potential risk in New York City market as key local industries plan to reduce technology spend
(1) Other industries include Agriculture, Mining, Construction, Transportation, Utilities, IT, Petroleum, Services, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Transportation and EducationNote: IT spend includes corporate expenditure on hardware, software and services expenses and telecom spend includes voice and data communication expenses. Source: Gartner Group, IDC, Economy.com, Dun & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis
US IT and Telecom Spendas Avg % of Firm Revenue by Industry
Te
chn
olo
gy S
pen
d a
s a
% o
f Re
ven
ue
0%
5%
10%
15%
2000 2001 (E) 2002 (E)
Government Communications Financial ServicesRetail/Wholesale Others (1)
US IT Spend by Industry (2000)
$ 59 B
$ 112 B
$ 151 B
$ 67 B
$ 379 B
10
The 9/11 events caused major infrastructure damage of ~$2B to the IT and Telecom sector…
Source: Morgan Stanley estimates, NYC Comptroller Report, news articles, BAH Analysis
Estimated One-time Capital Losses from Event
2170
50
1400
720
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
Total Capital Losses Other Capital Losses Netw ork, Communication,Hardw are and Equipment
Losses
Facilities Losses
Cost Categories
Es
tim
ate
d L
os
se
d (
$M
M)
Based on $600/sq. ft. value estimate for 140 West Street property
(Verizon)
Based on $600/sq. ft. value estimate for 140 West Street property
(Verizon)
Estimated $2B in communication and utility
cable/equipment repair -- $70% attributed to communications
Estimated $2B in communication and utility
cable/equipment repair -- $70% attributed to communications
Includes replacement of cellular towers and other
small replacement requirements
Includes replacement of cellular towers and other
small replacement requirements
… other sectors lost ~$10B of technology infrastructure
11
Lower Manhattan saw a direct loss of 16 sector companies and 1,123 sector jobs
Pre 9/11 Lower Manhattan
IT and Telecom Sector
Sub-SectorSub-Sector
IT HardwareIT Hardware
# Co.’s# Co.’s
33
IT ServicesIT Services 159159
IT SoftwareIT Software 107107
Telecom HardwareTelecom Hardware 22
Telecom ServicesTelecom Services 9292
JobsJobs
4949
8,5258,525
5,1225,122
468468
3,9443,944
Sub-SectorSub-Sector
IT HardwareIT Hardware
IT ServicesIT Services
IT SoftwareIT Software
Telecom HardwareTelecom Hardware
Telecom ServicesTelecom Services
# Co.’s# Co.’s
00
88
55
00
33
JobsJobs
00
800800
238238
00
8585
Business Loss in Lower Manhattan
IT and Telecom Sector
TotalTotal 1616 1,1231,123
TotalTotal 363363 18,10818,108
*Note: Includes companies with head offices in buildings destroyed on 9/11, in which >75% of employees worked at the head officeSource: Dun & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis
Avesta Computer Svcs Bridge Fixed Income Svcs Careerengine Network Espeed Lindatech Metiom SRA America Thor Technologies Financial Technologies Lava Trading Optech Systems Temenos USA Thebeast.com Ati Telecom Ingress Net Interoute Telcommunications
Avesta Computer Svcs Bridge Fixed Income Svcs Careerengine Network Espeed Lindatech Metiom SRA America Thor Technologies Financial Technologies Lava Trading Optech Systems Temenos USA Thebeast.com Ati Telecom Ingress Net Interoute Telcommunications
Listing of Sector Businesses Lost in Lower Manhattan*
12
11-Sep 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 5th Qtr 6th Qtr +
Original Planned Spend
Revised Spend
Emergency Spend
Looking forward, planned technology spending has been postponed by six to twelve months
Reinstate ServiceReinstate Service Rationalize InstallationRationalize Installation
Upgrade to New Standards
Upgrade to New Standards
• Incur large tactical emergency spend to restore basic services
• Address emergency needs via “patches” to systems
• Replace stopgap measures with more permanent solutions
• Install new equipment and systems to match (or surpass) original upgrade plans
ILLUSTRATIVE
ILLUSTRATIVE
STAGE 1 STAGE 2 STAGE 3
IT Spending
13
The current downward trend in revenue growth will likely be extended for 2-3 quarters
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
4Q-99
1Q-00
2Q-00
3Q-00
4Q-00
1Q-01
2Q-01
3Q-01
4Q-01
1Q-02
2Q-02
3Q-02
4Q-02
1Q-03
2Q-03
3Q-03
4Q-03
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
Post 9/11 Revenue Pre 9/11 GrowthPost 9/11 Growth
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
4Q-99
1Q-00
2Q-00
3Q-00
4Q-00
1Q-01
2Q-01
3Q-01
4Q-01
1Q-02
2Q-02
3Q-02
4Q-02
1Q-03
2Q-03
3Q-03
4Q-03
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
Post 9/11 Revenue Pre 9/11 Growth Post 9/11 Growth
Rev
enue
s ($
BN
)
Rev
enue
s ($
BN
)
Quarterly NYC IT Revenue Quarterly NYC Telecom Revenue
Replacement of $12B technology infrastructure will be a source of revenue for the national technology sector New York City will see 2.3% (of $12B) over 6-8 quarters
Source: Gartner Group, IDC, Economy.com, Dun & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis
14
The employment downturn will also be extended and a turnaround will lag revenue recovery
4Q-99
1Q-00
2Q-00
3Q-00
4Q-00
1Q-01
2Q-01
3Q-01
4Q-01
1Q-02
2Q-02
3Q-02
4Q-02
1Q-03
2Q-03
3Q-03
4Q-03
Pre 9/11 New Forecast
Em
ploy
ees
Quarterly NYC IT Employment Quarterly NYC Telecom Employment
0
Rebuild efforts and temporary outsourcing service requirements limit additional layoffs
As economy recovers, greater perceived need for decentralized IT operations and enhanced business continuity plans (particularly for FS firms) drives increased IT service and equipment demand and needed employment
New employment recovery expected in late 2002, approximately three quarters later than originally forecasted
Service reconnection efforts and new service connections limit additional layoffs
As economy recovers, enduring security and travel concerns cause incremental increases in data and voice service usage as well as new network technology (e.g., VPN) deployment -- driving longer term employment increases
Long term recovery now planned for late 2002, early 2003, approximately three quarters later than originally forecasted
4Q-99
1Q-00
2Q-00
3Q-00
4Q-00
1Q-01
2Q-01
3Q-01
4Q-01
1Q-02
2Q-02
3Q-02
4Q-02
1Q-03
2Q-03
3Q-03
4Q-03
Pre 9/11 New Forecast
Em
ploy
ees
0
40,000
60,000
50,000
30,000
40,000
60,000
50,000
30,000
15
Overall, the incremental impact on IT and Telecom from the 9/11 attacks is minimal relative to other sectors
Companies replacing damaged and/or destroyed equipment will drive a temporary increase in spending in certain technology subsectors
In addition, somewhat more persistent factors (e.g., increased concerns over security, redundancy, and disaster recovery) will drive longer-term increased spending
Spending on smaller, more forward-looking projects may increase as management time is redirected from enterprisewide application upgrades/installations
However, the increasingly uncertain environment created by the events will translate into a deceleration of new growth
The expected recovery from slowing growth trends will be delayed 6-12 months and is widely expected to occur in late 2002
Companies replacing damaged and/or destroyed equipment will drive a temporary increase in spending in certain technology subsectors
In addition, somewhat more persistent factors (e.g., increased concerns over security, redundancy, and disaster recovery) will drive longer-term increased spending
Spending on smaller, more forward-looking projects may increase as management time is redirected from enterprisewide application upgrades/installations
However, the increasingly uncertain environment created by the events will translate into a deceleration of new growth
The expected recovery from slowing growth trends will be delayed 6-12 months and is widely expected to occur in late 2002
Nearly zero incremental impact -- overall economic trends continue to drive the NYC IT and Telecom sector
Nearly zero incremental impact -- overall economic trends continue to drive the NYC IT and Telecom sector
Key Drivers
Net Incremental Impact
16
The IT and Telecom sector provides critical capabilities that can help support a recovery in overall NYC business
• Increase availability of mobile cellular banks, mobile switches, and other “quick-fix” equipment
• Establish new precedents in cooperation for disaster recovery planning (e.g., system sharing, wiring blueprints, and other operational knowledge)
• Work as an industry to roll out 3G and 802.11b wireless technologies in high-impact areas for business network infrastructures
• Accelerate optical switching rollout to speed new business/location deployment time
• Leverage new and existing network infrastructures to provide greater data transport capacity
• Incorporate lessons learned from recovery efforts to set new targets/thresholds for service provisioning and repair cycle times
• Install state of the art broadband infrastructure allowing distributed business operations within New York City (e.g., Lower Manhattan, Queens, Brooklyn)
• Leverage newest high-speed fiber technologies to distribute existing telecom switching operations
Provide robust levels of redundancy and survivability
Develop and deploy new technologies to drive business forward
Areas of Potential Contribution
Examples
Provide enhanced capacity and service levels
Deploy infrastructure to enable distributed business operations
17
Limits on the IT and Telecom sector’s ability to drive these innovations and improvements could impair the remainder of the NYC economy
Customers feel insecure and vulnerable …
Customers feel insecure and vulnerable …
Technology companies
cannot support cutting edge
efforts
Technology companies
cannot support cutting edge
efforts
Sense of vulnerability (on both individual and corporate levels) heightens concerns about redundancy, security
Sense of vulnerability (on both individual and corporate levels) heightens concerns about redundancy, security
Dangers for the remainder of the economy
Dangers for the remainder of the economy
• The development of new technology-dependent products/services (e.g., online brokerages) is hindered
• Competition in the space is diminished potentially increasing costs and limiting innovative approaches to business
• The natural redundancy of multi-carrier networks is reduced, increasing risk for all businesses
• The development of new technology-dependent products/services (e.g., online brokerages) is hindered
• Competition in the space is diminished potentially increasing costs and limiting innovative approaches to business
• The natural redundancy of multi-carrier networks is reduced, increasing risk for all businesses
… so they are reluctant to spend on new technologies …
… so they are reluctant to spend on new technologies …
Customers are less focused on expanding offerings vs. protecting/preserving core operationsCustomers are less focused on expanding offerings vs. protecting/preserving core operations
… and any spend is for traditional services
… and any spend is for traditional services
Customers exhibit greater reliance on/gravitation towards proven service offerings of established players
Customers exhibit greater reliance on/gravitation towards proven service offerings of established players
Investors are reluctant to fund high-risk ventures
Investors are reluctant to fund high-risk ventures
Newly uncertain environment restricts access to new venture capitalNewly uncertain environment restricts access to new venture capital
Available funds have been used for recovery
Available funds have been used for recovery
Communications companies in particular are short of cash for new projectsCommunications companies in particular are short of cash for new projects
18
ActionAction
To address any potential issues we developed eleven joint public and private sector actions
Impact on NYCImpact on NYC Primary SupportPrimary Support
1.) Reimburse/finance the efforts of key players to rebuild while upgrading
1.) Reimburse/finance the efforts of key players to rebuild while upgrading
2.) Help companies with capacity find customers with needs2.) Help companies with capacity find customers with needs
3.) Upgrade capacity and capability of communications infrastructure3.) Upgrade capacity and capability of communications infrastructure
4.) Improve customer service, satisfaction, and customer options for communications service options
4.) Improve customer service, satisfaction, and customer options for communications service options
5.) Establish demand-side and supply-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements
5.) Establish demand-side and supply-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements
6.) Establish new business development region with advanced technology infrastructure
6.) Establish new business development region with advanced technology infrastructure
7.) Provide mechanisms to help small technology sector companies take advantage of rebuilding spend
7.) Provide mechanisms to help small technology sector companies take advantage of rebuilding spend
8.) Enable small companies to refocus and/or diversify to accommodate shifts in company priorities
8.) Enable small companies to refocus and/or diversify to accommodate shifts in company priorities
9.) Support competition in communications services by educating businesses on available service alternatives
9.) Support competition in communications services by educating businesses on available service alternatives
10.) Channel investments to technologies critical to native NYC industries
10.) Channel investments to technologies critical to native NYC industries
11.) Establish NYC as center of technology R&D by fostering climate for new technology venturing
11.) Establish NYC as center of technology R&D by fostering climate for new technology venturing
44
11
44
22
44
22
22
11
11
33
22
Combined public and private sectorCombined public and private sector
Private sectorPrivate sector
Combined public and private sectorCombined public and private sector
Combined public and private sectorCombined public and private sector
Private sectorPrivate sector
Combined public and private sectorCombined public and private sector
Combined public and private sectorCombined public and private sector
Private sectorPrivate sector
Combined public and private sectorCombined public and private sector
Private sectorPrivate sector
Public sectorPublic sector
0 4 High ImpactLow Impact
19
SAMPLE ACTION: Establish business and service-provider consortia to address infrastructure requirements
ActionActionEstablish business and service-provider consortia to address infrastructure requirementsEstablish business and service-provider consortia to address infrastructure requirements
Implementation Actions
Implementation Actions
Solicit participants, from key businesses, service providers, and equipment manufacturers (e.g., Large Financial Services companies, Verizon, AT&T, Lucent, AOL) to ensure buy-iin from all key consituents
Business and service provider consortia should operate jointly and independently to determine constituents specific needs Suggested agenda items:
• Disaster recover and survivability planning• Capacity requirements and constraints• New technology requirements and implementation methods
Suggested action-item categories:• Methods for funding potentially non-economically beneficial activities (e.g., redundancy creation) by individual members• Required / Suggested policy changes• Specific responsibilities for implementation by member companies (e.g., client corporations required to upgrade so
service provider investments in new technologies will have a market)
Solicit participants, from key businesses, service providers, and equipment manufacturers (e.g., Large Financial Services companies, Verizon, AT&T, Lucent, AOL) to ensure buy-iin from all key consituents
Business and service provider consortia should operate jointly and independently to determine constituents specific needs Suggested agenda items:
• Disaster recover and survivability planning• Capacity requirements and constraints• New technology requirements and implementation methods
Suggested action-item categories:• Methods for funding potentially non-economically beneficial activities (e.g., redundancy creation) by individual members• Required / Suggested policy changes• Specific responsibilities for implementation by member companies (e.g., client corporations required to upgrade so
service provider investments in new technologies will have a market)
Key CostsKey Costs
Key BenefitsKey Benefits
Establishment of consortia and coordination costs should incur minimal costs ~1 management-level FTE to help coordinate key players Overall Cost Estimate: $4-6MM Source of funds: Private consortia/key individual company members
Establishment of consortia and coordination costs should incur minimal costs ~1 management-level FTE to help coordinate key players Overall Cost Estimate: $4-6MM Source of funds: Private consortia/key individual company members
Enables greater infrastructure redundancy and advanced capabilities without placing undue burden on supply-side sector companies to invest capital with no expectation of reasonable return
Potentially, provides valuable precedent for greater cooperation between supply-side sector companies and demand-side industries for future issues
Provide forum to develop future disaster recovery plans
Enables greater infrastructure redundancy and advanced capabilities without placing undue burden on supply-side sector companies to invest capital with no expectation of reasonable return
Potentially, provides valuable precedent for greater cooperation between supply-side sector companies and demand-side industries for future issues
Provide forum to develop future disaster recovery plans
FeasibilityFeasibility
High Cost to establish consortia is minimal, and cost to deploy redundancy should be matched as best as possible with
potential for increased revenue/earnings to supply-side companies Allows greater redundancy to be built without public-sector intervention
High Cost to establish consortia is minimal, and cost to deploy redundancy should be matched as best as possible with
potential for increased revenue/earnings to supply-side companies Allows greater redundancy to be built without public-sector intervention
EXAMPLE
EXAMPLE
20
SAMPLE ACTION (continued): Establish business and service provider consortia to address infrastructure requirements
Sample Agenda Items
Kickoff Timing
Infrastructure providers (e.g., Verizon, AT&T)
Business continuity service providers (e.g., SunGard)
Equipment providers (e.g., IBM, EMC)
EXAMPLE
EXAMPLE
Key Players
Advanced/Alternative Technology Capability Requirements
Infrastructure Capacity Requirements
Business Continuity Requirements• Infrastructure Redundancy• Data Backup• Equipment/Space Availability
Immediate Representatives from key NYC industries (e.g., Financial Services, Media)
Business Service Providers
12-24 months Infrastructure providers (e.g., Verizon, AT&T)
Equipment providers (e.g., IBM, EMC)
Key new technology players (e.g., Level3)
Representatives from key NYC industries (e.g., Financial Services, Media)
Representatives from key NYC industries (e.g., Financial Services, Media)
6-12 months Infrastructure providers (e.g., Verizon, AT&T)
Ley new technology players (e.g., Level3)
Disaster Recovery Requirements for Small Businesses
Representatives from key NYC industries (e.g., Financial Services, Media) -- with representation from small players within each
Immediate Infrastructure providers (e.g., Verizon, AT&T)
Business continuity service providers (e.g., SunGard)
Equipment providers (e.g., IBM, EMC)
21
NYC Snapshot
22
The New York IT and Telecom sector includes a number of familiar names, along with plenty of smaller players
SectorSector
ITIT
Sub-SectorSub-Sector
HardwareHardware
TelecomTelecom
SoftwareSoftware
ServicesServices
HardwareHardware
Voice (Local &
LD)
Voice (Local &
LD)
SIC Code - DescriptionSIC Code - Description
357 - Computers, Peripherals, Office Equipment
357 - Computers, Peripherals, Office Equipment
7371/2 - Computer related software
7371/2 - Computer related software
7373 to 7379 - Computer related services
7373 to 7379 - Computer related services
366 - Communications Equipment
366 - Communications Equipment
ExamplesExamples
Human Scale Corporation Dot Hill Systems Corporation
Human Scale Corporation Dot Hill Systems Corporation
Nutech Integrated Systems Aegis Software
Nutech Integrated Systems Aegis Software
AMC Computer Corporation Netik Inc.
AMC Computer Corporation Netik Inc.
L3 Communications Loral Space Communications
L3 Communications Loral Space Communications
WirelessWireless
DataData
4812 - Wireless Telecom Services
4813 - Telecom Services 4822 - Telegraph and other
Communications 4899 - Telecom services, not
elsewhere classified
4812 - Wireless Telecom Services
4813 - Telecom Services 4822 - Telegraph and other
Communications 4899 - Telecom services, not
elsewhere classified
Verizon RSL Communications Arbinet-thexchange
Verizon RSL Communications Arbinet-thexchange
23
The technology sector generated $37.8B* and employed nearly 97,000 people throughout New York City
4.4
21.8
42,406 488
361,516
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Revenue* Jobs Companies
Hardware Services
4.215,667
414
1,50629
6.735,694
731
0.6
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Revenue Jobs Companies
Software Hardware Services
1,17452,867$11.6B 52443,922$26.2B*
Information TechnologyRevenue, Jobs, and Companies (2000)
TelecommunicationsRevenue, Jobs, and Companies (2000)
*Note: Only includes revenues generated in New York City. Verizon generates an additional $61B outside of New York CitySource: Dunn & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis
24
Small companies provide nearly 40% of the employment and approximately 15% of revenues
11%
39%
82%
13%
34%
17%
83%
55%
24%
4%
37%
1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Revenue NYC-generated Revenue* Jobs Companies
Small Medium Large
1,69896,789$100B
NYC IT & Telecom Industry by Firm Size
*Note: Only includes revenues generated in New York City. Verizon generates an additional $61B outside of New York CitySource: Dunn & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis
$37.8B*
25
Most sector companies reside within Manhattan -- Lower Manhattan hosts approximately 20% of the employment
Other Boroughs
Firms Revenue
$3.0B206
Jobs
18,127
Lower Manhattan
$4.0B18,108
Jobs Revenue
363
Firms
Other Manhattan
$30.9B
Revenue
1,131
Firms
60,554
Jobs
ITIT
HardwareHardware
Lower Manhattan
Lower Manhattan
4949
Other Manhattan
Other Manhattan
501501
Other Boroughs
Other Boroughs
956956
SoftwareSoftware 8,5258,525 24,62624,626 2,5432,543
ServicesServices 5,1225,122 10,02510,025 520520
TelecomTelecomHardwareHardware 468468 432432 616616
ServicesServices 3,9443,944 24,97024,970 13,49213,492
New York City IT and Telecom Employment (2000)
TotalTotal 18,10818,108 60,55460,554 18,12718,127
ITIT
HardwareHardware
Lower Manhattan
Lower Manhattan
$0.02$0.02
Other Manhattan
Other Manhattan
$0.5$0.5
Other Boroughs
Other Boroughs
$0.1$0.1
SoftwareSoftware $1.1$1.1 $3.1$3.1 $0.07$0.07
ServicesServices $1.1$1.1 $5.4$5.4 $0.2$0.2
TelecomTelecomHardwareHardware $0.3$0.3 $3.9$3.9 $0.2$0.2
ServicesServices $1.4$1.4 $18.0$18.0 $2.4$2.4
New York City IT and Telecom Revenues (2000)
TotalTotal $4.0$4.0 $30.9$30.9 $3.0$3.0
Overall Distribution of IT/Telecom Firms, Jobs, and Revenue by NYC Region
26
Pre 9/11 Baseline
27
Pre-attack trends for IT and telecom showed slowing growth rates, with an anticipated rebound in Q4 2002
Expect steady 8-10% long-term growth for
wireless
Expect steady 8-10% long-term growth for
wireless
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Software Services Hardware
Ann
ual I
T R
even
ue G
row
th
Ann
ual T
elec
om R
even
ue G
row
th (
%)
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Telecom Hardware Voice
Data Wireless
IT IndustryPre-9/11 Projected Annual Growth
Telecom IndustryPre-9/11 Projected Annual Growth
New technology purchases drive the IT Hardware market, creating greater sensitivity to slowing corporate IT spend and a general economic downturn
Outsourcing, maintenance, and other short-term fixed IT spend areas support the service sector, limiting its exposure to economic downturns
Emphasis on security systems (e.g., virus protection, intruder detection) drove any software growth in 2000-2001
Decreased growth in wireless and data was expected as penetration increased
Local voice maket expected to remain flat, with long distance services seeing declines due to price competition
Hardware will experience a rebound with the roll out of new technologies such as 3G and 802.11b
Source: IDC, Gartner Group, Economy.com, BAH Analysis
28
Prior to the 9/11 attacks, the IT hardware subsector was on a downward trend, with software and services experiencing slowed growth
SubsectorSubsector
HardwareHardware
TrendTrend DriversDrivers
Corporate IT spending trends play a major role Key consumers of technology were slowing overall capital expenditures Slowdown in consumer spending affects PC market
Corporate IT spending trends play a major role Key consumers of technology were slowing overall capital expenditures Slowdown in consumer spending affects PC market
SoftwareSoftware
Shift in spending was away from discretionary software Security was already a priority for many companies Spending levels are maintained by long-term contracts and need to
upgrade
Shift in spending was away from discretionary software Security was already a priority for many companies Spending levels are maintained by long-term contracts and need to
upgrade
ServicesServices
Outsourcing services benefited as companied sought to reduce costs Companies delivering discretionary services (e.g. customer software
development) saw the greatest slowdown
Outsourcing services benefited as companied sought to reduce costs Companies delivering discretionary services (e.g. customer software
development) saw the greatest slowdown
Company SizeCompany Size
SmallSmall
TrendTrend DriversDrivers
Smaller firms felt disproportionately large impact from economic slowdown
Funding for new ventures had become scarce
Smaller firms felt disproportionately large impact from economic slowdown
Funding for new ventures had become scarce
LargeLarge
Many large firms had begun to lay off workers to maintain profitability A return to growth was expected in 2002
Many large firms had begun to lay off workers to maintain profitability A return to growth was expected in 2002
Detailed subsector-specific trend data is included in Appendix A
29
In the telecom sector, well-capitalized incumbent wireless service providers drove pre-9/11 growth while the hardware sector was in a decline
SubsectorSubsector
HardwareHardware
TrendTrend DriversDrivers
Slowdowns in corporate spending limited once-high growth Large providers that had planned for continued explosive growth faced an inventory glut Failures/bankruptcies in several sectors (e.g., CLECs) placed strains on vendor financing activities
Slowdowns in corporate spending limited once-high growth Large providers that had planned for continued explosive growth faced an inventory glut Failures/bankruptcies in several sectors (e.g., CLECs) placed strains on vendor financing activities
Wireless (voice)Wireless (voice)
Trends from Europe and Japan indicated wireless services would weather the economic slowdown well
Slowdown in growth was a consequence of increased penetration rather than economic conditions Increasing ARPU offset slowdown in new subscribers
Trends from Europe and Japan indicated wireless services would weather the economic slowdown well
Slowdown in growth was a consequence of increased penetration rather than economic conditions Increasing ARPU offset slowdown in new subscribers
Wireline voice (LD&IXC)Wireline voice (LD&IXC)
Markets were nearly 100% saturated and facing cutthroat price competition Growth was extremely limited
Markets were nearly 100% saturated and facing cutthroat price competition Growth was extremely limited
DataData
Growth in high-bandwidth services was driven by constantly increasing data requiremens and advanced internet applicaitons
CLEC and competitive player failures were becoming increasingly common, but incumbents continued to perform well
Growth in high-bandwidth services was driven by constantly increasing data requiremens and advanced internet applicaitons
CLEC and competitive player failures were becoming increasingly common, but incumbents continued to perform well
Company SizeCompany Size
SmallSmall
TrendTrend DriversDrivers
Smaller firms felt disproportionately large impact from economic slowdown Funding for new ventures had become scarce
Smaller firms felt disproportionately large impact from economic slowdown Funding for new ventures had become scarce
LargeLarge
Large telecom firms (e.g., Verizon) experiencing increased profit margins Medium size wireless carriers were having trouble accessing capital for growth Voice continued to experience margin pressure Data services were growing
Large telecom firms (e.g., Verizon) experiencing increased profit margins Medium size wireless carriers were having trouble accessing capital for growth Voice continued to experience margin pressure Data services were growing
Detailed subsector-specific trend data is included in Appendix A
30
Impact Assessment
31
Emphasis on infrastructure integrity and security will help lessen the decline and hasten the rebound in the IT and Telecom sector
Overall, the IT and telecom sector in NYC is expected to see an immediate reduction in growth rates for the next two quarters before recovering to pre-9/11 levels by the end of 2002
• Opportunity for stronger players to consolidate their position
• Challenge for small business to survive this slump
IT hardware will likely continue on a downward trend until the overall economy recovers
• Spending on subsector is driven by overall economic trends
• The impact on the NYC economy is small relative to other sectors
Multiyear contracts will help IT services firms avoid the impact of 9/11 in the near term
• Changes in spending priorities and habits will not be immediately felt as existing long-term contracts must be “served out”
• Certain services provided are fundamental to business operations (e.g., data center operations) and cannot be easily curtailed in the short term
Software manufacturers could begin to see negative growth in the short-term
• NYC based clients are likely to spend less on software
• Majority of the software companies are small firms and may not be able to absorb several quarters of reduced revenues
32
The immediate capital loss from the 9/11 attack is estimated at ~$2B, comprised primarily of facilities & equipment
… Other sectors lost ~$10B of technology infrastructure
Source: Morgan Stanley estimates, NYC Comptroller Report, news articles, BAH Analysis
Estimated One-time Capital Losses from Event
2170
50
1400
720
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
Total Capital Losses Other Capital Losses Netw ork, Communication,Hardw are and Equipment
Losses
Facilities Losses
Cost Categories
Es
tim
ate
d L
os
se
d (
$M
M)
Based on $600/sq. ft. value estimate for 140 West Street property
(Verizon)
Based on $600/sq. ft. value estimate for 140 West Street property
(Verizon)
Estimated $2B in communication and utility
cable/equipment repair -- $70% attributed to communications
Estimated $2B in communication and utility
cable/equipment repair -- $70% attributed to communications
Includes replacement of cellular towers and other
small replacement requirements
Includes replacement of cellular towers and other
small replacement requirements
33
Overall, the incremental impact on IT and Telecom from the 9/11 attacks is minimal relative to other sectors…
Companies replacing damaged and/or destroyed equipment will drive a temporary increase in spending in certain technology subsectors
In addition, somewhat more persistent factors (e.g., increased concerns over security, redundancy, and disaster recovery) will drive longer-term increased spending
Spending on smaller, more forward-looking projects may increase as management time is redirected from enterprisewide application upgrades/installations
However, the increasingly uncertain environment created by the events will translate into a deceleration of new growth
The expected recovery from slowing growth trends will be delayed 6-12 months and is widely expected to occur in late 2002
Companies replacing damaged and/or destroyed equipment will drive a temporary increase in spending in certain technology subsectors
In addition, somewhat more persistent factors (e.g., increased concerns over security, redundancy, and disaster recovery) will drive longer-term increased spending
Spending on smaller, more forward-looking projects may increase as management time is redirected from enterprisewide application upgrades/installations
However, the increasingly uncertain environment created by the events will translate into a deceleration of new growth
The expected recovery from slowing growth trends will be delayed 6-12 months and is widely expected to occur in late 2002
Nearly zero short-term incremental impact -- overall economic trends continue to
drive the NYC IT and Telecom sector, and could result in slower long-term growth
Nearly zero short-term incremental impact -- overall economic trends continue to
drive the NYC IT and Telecom sector, and could result in slower long-term growth
Key Drivers
Net Incremental Impact
34
… but limits on the IT and Telecom sector’s ability to drive innovations could impair the remainder of the NYC economy
Customers feel insecure and vulnerable …
Customers feel insecure and vulnerable …
Technology companies
cannot support cutting edge
efforts
Technology companies
cannot support cutting edge
efforts
Sense of vulnerability (on both individual and corporate levels) heightens concerns about redundancy, security
Sense of vulnerability (on both individual and corporate levels) heightens concerns about redundancy, security
Dangers for the remainder of the economy
Dangers for the remainder of the economy
• The development of new technology-dependent products/services (e.g., online brokerages) is hindered
• Competition in the space is diminished potentially increasing costs and limiting innovative approaches to business
• The natural redundancy of multi-carrier networks is reduced, increasing risk for all businesses
• The development of new technology-dependent products/services (e.g., online brokerages) is hindered
• Competition in the space is diminished potentially increasing costs and limiting innovative approaches to business
• The natural redundancy of multi-carrier networks is reduced, increasing risk for all businesses
… so they are reluctant to spend on new technologies …
… so they are reluctant to spend on new technologies …
Customers are less focused on expanding offerings vs. protecting/preserving core operationsCustomers are less focused on expanding offerings vs. protecting/preserving core operations
… and any spend is for traditional services
… and any spend is for traditional services
Customers exhibit greater reliance on/gravitation towards proven service offerings of established players
Customers exhibit greater reliance on/gravitation towards proven service offerings of established players
Investors are reluctant to fund high-risk ventures
Investors are reluctant to fund high-risk ventures
Newly uncertain environment restricts access to new venture capitalNewly uncertain environment restricts access to new venture capital
Available funds have been used for recovery
Available funds have been used for recovery
Communications companies in particular are short of cash for new projectsCommunications companies in particular are short of cash for new projects
35
Although Lower Manhattan is home to 363 sector companies, their business base was not severely impacted by 9/11
Pre 9/11 Lower Manhattan
IT and Telecom Sector
Sub-SectorSub-Sector
IT HardwareIT Hardware
# Co.’s# Co.’s
33
IT ServicesIT Services 159159
IT SoftwareIT Software 107107
Telecom HardwareTelecom Hardware 22
Telecom ServicesTelecom Services 9292
JobsJobs
4949
8,5258,525
5,1225,122
468468
3,9443,944
Sub-SectorSub-Sector
IT HardwareIT Hardware
IT ServicesIT Services
IT SoftwareIT Software
Telecom HardwareTelecom Hardware
Telecom ServicesTelecom Services
# Co.’s# Co.’s
00
88
55
00
33
JobsJobs
00
800800
238238
00
8585
Business Loss in Lower Manhattan
IT and Telecom Sector
TotalTotal 1616 1,1231,123
TotalTotal 363363 18,10818,108
*Note: Includes companies with head offices in buildings destroyed on 9/11, in which >75% of employees worked at the head officeSource: Dun & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis
Avesta Computer Svcs Bridge Fixed Income Svcs Careerengine Network Espeed Lindatech Metiom SRA America Thor Technologies Financial Technologies Lava Trading Optech Systems Temenos USA Thebeast.com Ati Telecom Ingress Net Interoute Telcommunications
Avesta Computer Svcs Bridge Fixed Income Svcs Careerengine Network Espeed Lindatech Metiom SRA America Thor Technologies Financial Technologies Lava Trading Optech Systems Temenos USA Thebeast.com Ati Telecom Ingress Net Interoute Telcommunications
Listing of Sector Businesses Lost in Lower Manhattan*
36
Rebuilding efforts support the technology sector – estimates indicate $8B of technology infrastructure must be replaced by former WTC occupants
1 WTC 2 WTC
Company Emp Floors Company Emp FloorsSandler O'Neill 177 0.5 Windows on the World 70 2
AON 1100 9 Cantor Fitzgerald 1000 3
Fiduciary Trust 645 4 Marsh & McLennan 3200 8
American Bureau of Shipping 16 0.5 Fred Alger Mgmt 55 1.5
Washington Group 190 0.5 Carr Futures 141 1.5
Keefe, Bruyette & Woods 171 2 Ohrenstein & Brown 91 1
NYS DOT&F 222 2 Network Plus 46 1
Harris Beach 113 1 Port Authority 2000 23
Euro Brokers/Maxcor 285 1 Dai-Ichi Kangyo Bank 300 3
Fuji Bank 625 4 Lehman Brothers 618 3
Morgan Stanley 3500 17 Kemper Insurance 234 2
Bridge Info Sys 284 2 Empire Blue Cross 1914 10
ICAP 500 2 ICAP 250 1
Fireman's Fund 190 2 Bank of America 400 3
Wachovia/First Union 48 1
Thatcher Proffitt & Wood 300 3
Frankel & Co. 213 1.5
Oppenheimer Funds 598 5
Sun Microsystems 300 2
Scor-US 120 1.5
Source: NYC Comptroller Report
WTC Towers, Tenants by Floors and Employees, 9/10/01
ObservationsObservations
A significant portion of the companies within the WTC are large-sized firms (500+ employees)
Not considering those with significant lost employees, these firms are likely to require significant additional IT and telecom spending outlays to set up operations elsewhere
These IT and telecom expenditures can be expected to mostly go to NYC-based IT firms
A significant portion of the companies within the WTC are large-sized firms (500+ employees)
Not considering those with significant lost employees, these firms are likely to require significant additional IT and telecom spending outlays to set up operations elsewhere
These IT and telecom expenditures can be expected to mostly go to NYC-based IT firms
UNKNOWN: Who will leave NYC?UNKNOWN: Who will leave NYC?
Companies with greater than 500 employees within WTC
37
Technology subsectors taken individually see minimal net incremental impact of the attacks
Incremental Impact*Sub-SectorShort Term Long Term
Qualitative Incremental Impact
General Capital Loss Short-t($2.17B)m
Moderate short term revenue gain – initial repair/replacement ofdamaged infrastructure will drive near-term revenues; long-terminfrastructure development will take 18 to 24 months and drive slower butmore sustained revenue growth
IT Hardware (0.5%) (0.2%) Increase in revenue from rebuild spending will be counterweighed bygeneral spending slowdown
IT
IT Software (1.3%) 0.1% Rebuild spending and new investment in selectedinfrastructure/operations capabilities (e.g., security, video conf., remoteaccess) will come primarily as a shift in spend away from typical growthareas (ERP, CRM, etc)
IT Services (1.6%) 0.2% Rebuild spending in selected outsourced services (e.g., data center) andnew investment in key business continuity planning/services will comeprimarily as a shift away from discretionary spending on services
TelecomHardware
(0.7%) (0.2%) Increase in revenue from rebuild spending will be counterweighed bygeneral spending slowdown
Wireless 0.1% 0.1% Increase in revenue from usage and customer growth as a result ofsecurity/ travel concerns
Local Voice (0.05%) 0.0% Small increase in revenue from videoconferencing and/or telecommuting-related usage will only slightly offset declining voice market
Long DistanceVoice
(0.05%) 0.0% Small increase in revenue from videoconferencing and/or telecommuting-related usage will only slightly offset declining voice market
Telecom
Data- Telephony
Short-term revenue shortfalls from service interruptions counterweighedby new service connections due to relocations
- Cable
(1.5%) 0.2%
Minimal one-time revenue decrease due to loss of customers andbusiness activity
*Note: Impact figures defined as difference between pre-9/11 growth levels and base scenario post-9/11 growth levels, one quarter and eight quarters beyond 3Q-01 for short-term and long-term, respectively
Detailed projections are provided in Appendix B
38
Actions
39
After analyzing the impact to the sector, we developed four imperatives and associated actions to mitigate the effects
Accelerate restoration of communications infrastructure• Reimburse/finance rebuilding of damaged infrastructure• Leverage opportunities to deploy “leapfrogging” technologies
Build the broadband infrastructure to support multiple centers of business around New York City (e.g., Lower Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, Upper Manhattan)
Imperatives Key Actions
Create industry-specific demand-side and supply-side consortia (e.g., Financial Services, Communications Services)
• Develop current and future industry-wide infrastructure requirements (e.g., redundancy, availability, capacity) and the plans to implement
• Establish clear communication of priorities to suppliers (equipment and services)• Coordinate new technology implementation efforts (e.g., mesh networks, 3G, etc)
among multiple service providers• Leverage existing industry consortia to extent possible (e.g., SIAC)
Establish new business development zone(s) throughout NYC• Identify and prioritize prospective areas for development• Deploy advanced technology infrastructure, targeted toward small-business
requirements
Establish industry-wide commitment to develop innovative technologies• Channel greater investment to new technologies enabling new business platforms• Provide public sector support where possible to encourage development and
deployment of new technologies (e.g., 3G, 802.11b, mesh networks)
Rebuild World-Class Infrastructure
Collaborate for the Future
Make NYC Better for Small Business
Nurture Innovation and Foster Competition
40
We developed specific actions, using four key imperatives that drive the IT and Telecom sector’s ability to support a NYC recovery
Rebuild World-Class Infrastructure
Rebuild World-Class Infrastructure
Replace one-time capital losses suffered by the industry as a result of the 9/11 events
Drive the NYC infrastructure forward by upgrading it where possible
Collaborate for the Future
Collaborate for the Future
Develop ongoing mechanism to determine technology requirements of different industries and NYC economy as a whole
Establish cooperative environment for technology players to work with customers to provide best solutions to address requirements
Make NYC Better for Small Business
Make NYC Better for Small Business
Provide resources to ensure the viability of small businesses within NYC, both within and outside of the technology sector
Nurture Innovation and Foster Competition
Nurture Innovation and Foster Competition
Facilitate the development of new technologies on an ongoing basis
Create an environment to encourage the exploration of new products and services
Imperative Description Potential Benefits
Provides short-term financial support to sector companies experiencing significant infrastructure damage
Restores IT/Telecom services and infrastructure while instituting higher levels of customer service
Enables greater infrastructure redundancy and advanced capabilities without placing undue burden on supply-side sector companies to invest capital with no expectation of reasonable return
Potentially, provides valuable precedent for greater cooperation between supply-side sector companies and demand-side industries for future issues
Allows small companies to leverage leading technologies in operations and/or service offerings
Provides key selling point for NYC to potential small business community members, vs. other regions
Encourages development/testing of innovative technologies on limited basis within NYC
Provides continued funding to high-growth areas, to ensure industry is not “left behind” by faster players elsewhere
Helps to retain skilled high-tech talent pool within NYC area
41
Eleven actions emerged across the imperatives
ActionsImperatives
1.) Reimburse/finance the efforts of key players to rebuild or repair damaged/destroyed infrastructure, getting NYC services “back to normal” while upgrading current infrastructure
2.) Help companies with capacity find customers with needs -- support customer access to key providers/subcontractors for short-term requirements
3.) Upgrade capacity and capability of communications infrastructure
4.) Improve customer service, satisfaction, and customer options for communications services
1.) Reimburse/finance the efforts of key players to rebuild or repair damaged/destroyed infrastructure, getting NYC services “back to normal” while upgrading current infrastructure
2.) Help companies with capacity find customers with needs -- support customer access to key providers/subcontractors for short-term requirements
3.) Upgrade capacity and capability of communications infrastructure
4.) Improve customer service, satisfaction, and customer options for communications services
5a.) Establish demand-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements
5b.) Establish supply-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements
5a.) Establish demand-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements
5b.) Establish supply-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements
6.) Establish new business development region with advanced technology infrastructure
7.) Provide mechanisms to help small technology sector companies take advantage of rebuilding spend
8.) Enable small companies to refocus and/or diversify to accommodate shifts in company priorities
9.) Support competition in communication services by educating businesses on available service alternatives
6.) Establish new business development region with advanced technology infrastructure
7.) Provide mechanisms to help small technology sector companies take advantage of rebuilding spend
8.) Enable small companies to refocus and/or diversify to accommodate shifts in company priorities
9.) Support competition in communication services by educating businesses on available service alternatives
10.) Channel investments to technologies critical to native NYC industries
11.) Establish NYC as center of technology R&D by fostering a climate for new technology venturing
10.) Channel investments to technologies critical to native NYC industries
11.) Establish NYC as center of technology R&D by fostering a climate for new technology venturing
Rebuild World-Class Infrastructure
Rebuild World-Class Infrastructure
Collaborate for the FutureCollaborate for the Future
Make NYC Better for Small Business
Make NYC Better for Small Business
Nurture Innovation and Foster Competition
Nurture Innovation and Foster Competition
42
Four actions stand out as the highest priority, with potentially enduring benefits and high feasibility
Each of the actions is discussed in detail in Appendix C
ActionsImperatives
1.) Reimburse/finance the efforts of key players to rebuild or repair damaged/destroyed infrastructure, getting NYC services “back to normal” while upgrading current infrastructure
5a.) Establish demand-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements
5b.)Establish supply-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements
6.) Establish new business development region with advanced technology infrastructure
10.) Channel investments to technologies critical to native NYC industries
Highest-Priority Actions1.) Reimburse/finance rebuilding …
8.) Enable small companies to refocus …
2.) Help companies with capacity find …
3.) Upgrade capacity and capability …
11.) Establish NYC as center of …
7.) Provide mechanisms to help small …
4.) Improve customer service, satisfaction …
10.) Channel investments to technologies …
9.) Support competition in communications …
5a.) Establish demand-side consortia …
6.) Establish new business development …
5b.) Establish supply-side consortia …
Rebuild World-Class
Infrastructure
Rebuild World-Class
Infrastructure
Collaborate for the Future
Collaborate for the Future
Make NYC Better for Small Business
Make NYC Better for Small Business
Nurture Innovation and Foster Competition
Nurture Innovation and Foster Competition
43
Methodology and Assumptions
44
At each stage of analysis, we validated hypotheses with multiple credible sources
NYC SnapshotNYC Snapshot
Leveraged Dun & Bradstreet database of NYC companies identified by SIC code
Gathered key information for these companies including employee and revenue figures
Isolated Lower Manhattan companies by zip code Developed profile of the technology sector, segmented by size and subsector
Pre 9/11 BaselinePre 9/11 Baseline
Projections based on external sources and overall economic drivers
Key factor is planned IT spend at major companies
ImpactImpact
Utilized three forecast scenarios (Base, Pessimistic, Optimistic) Incorporated interview results (industry executives, analysts, investment
experts) where possible Developed and incorporated subsector-specific assumptions where
appropriate (discussed within Impact section)
Section Description
IDC Gartner Group Economy.com
Incorporated interview results (industry executives, analysts, investment experts) where possible
InitiativesInitiatives
Developed set of candidate initiatives by:• Tapping internal resources within BA&H (both within and external to project
team)• Identifying key prospective actions suggested in research resources
Added to and refined this set based on interview feedback
45
Our sources included interviews with over 30 individuals, including large and small companies as well as sector experts
IntervieweesOrganizationOrganization
AccentureAccenture
AccentureAccenture
AccentureAccenture
Aegis Software IncAegis Software Inc
AMC CorporationAMC Corporation
Arbinet-thexchangeArbinet-thexchange
AT&TAT&T
AT&TAT&T
AvayaAvaya
Bear StearnsBear Stearns
CIBCCIBC
ConEd CommunicationsConEd Communications
CSFBCSFB
Global CrossingGlobal Crossing
IBMIBM
Inforocket.comInforocket.com
LucentLucent
LucentLucent
LucentLucent
LucentLucent
MSDWMSDW
MSDWMSDW
Netik IncNetik Inc
Nutech Integ. Sys.Nutech Integ. Sys.
Probe ResearchProbe Research
RCNRCN
RRE VenturesRRE Ventures
Siemens CorporationSiemens Corporation
VerizonVerizon
VerizonVerizon
VerizonVerizon
VerizonVerizon
Warburg PincusWarburg Pincus
NameNameBill AndrewsBill Andrews
Steve PhillipsSteve Phillips
Mark TillingerMark Tillinger
Andrew SerrelAndrew Serrel
Mark RomanowskiMark Romanowski
Mike LembergMike Lemberg
Michael ArmstrongMichael Armstrong
Reed HarrisonReed Harrison
Don PetersonDon Peterson
Rich LukajRich Lukaj
Gary RabinGary Rabin
Peter RustPeter Rust
Todd RakerTodd Raker
David CareyDavid Carey
Gus MaikishGus Maikish
Susan N.Susan N.
John HeindelJohn Heindel
Dave DialDave Dial
Nick DeTuraNick DeTura
Bob HolderBob Holder
Luis CarvalhoLuis Carvalho
Rich BilottiRich Bilotti
Pam CytronPam Cytron
Jessica KowalickJessica Kowalick
Allan TumolilloAllan Tumolillo
Ed KuczmaEd Kuczma
Jim Robinson IVJim Robinson IV
Klaus KleinfeldKlaus Kleinfeld
Bob IngallsBob Ingalls
David PitcherDavid Pitcher
Bruce GordonBruce Gordon
Paul CrottyPaul Crotty
Stewart GrossStewart Gross
Title/LevelTitle/LevelAssociate PartnerAssociate Partner
PartnerPartner
Partner, Capital Markets Group LeaderPartner, Capital Markets Group Leader
Senior Vice PresidentSenior Vice President
Chief Financial OfficerChief Financial Officer
DirectorDirector
CEOCEO
Senior VP, Local Service & NetworkSenior VP, Local Service & Network
CEOCEO
Senior MDSenior MD
Senior MDSenior MD
CEOCEO
Managing DirectorManaging Director
Senior VP, Global NetworkSenior VP, Global Network
Managing DirectorManaging Director
Executive Vice PresidentExecutive Vice President
President, Worldwide SvcsPresident, Worldwide Svcs
Product Management VPProduct Management VP
Global Program Mgmt VPGlobal Program Mgmt VP
Executive Vice PresidentExecutive Vice President
Managing DirectorManaging Director
Managing DirectorManaging Director
Executive Vice PresidentExecutive Vice President
ControllerController
Analyst, TelecomAnalyst, Telecom
VP, GM Manhattan OpsVP, GM Manhattan Ops
DirectorDirector
COOCOO
President, Bus. Solns. Grp.President, Bus. Solns. Grp.
Corporate EconomistCorporate Economist
President, Retail MarketsPresident, Retail Markets
Group President, NY & CTGroup President, NY & CT
Senior MDSenior MD
46
We analyzed the data from these sources to arrive at our projected estimates…
IDCIDC
Gartner GroupGartner Group
Economy.comEconomy.com
Analyst ReportsAnalyst Reports
National revenue projections
BAH
Analysis
BAH
Analysis
Compute national % growth trends
Adjust national trends to New York City trends
% of spend Elasticity for growth Population Base
Growth RatesGrowth Rates
2000 Revenues2000 Revenues
Revenue &
Growth
Projections
Revenue &
Growth
Projections
Dun & Bradstreet Report
IDCIDC
Gartner GroupGartner Group
National growth projections NYC Comptroller Reports
BAH
Analysis
BAH
Analysis
Dun & Bradstreet data New York city relationship to
national projections Job Loss reports (newspapers,
reports) in New York City
Growth RatesGrowth Rates
EmploymentReports
EmploymentReports
Employment
Projections
Employment
Projections
Projection Development Framework
Revenues
Employment
47
ScenarioScenario
… in the context of the three standard scenarios established by the Core Team
BaseBase
PessimisticPessimistic
OptimisticOptimistic
AssumptionsAssumptions
Unclear implications of conflict Recession in Q3 and Q4 2001 due to
declining consumer confidence Recovery in Q1 2002
Unclear implications of conflict Recession in Q3 and Q4 2001 due to
declining consumer confidence Recovery in Q1 2002
Economic depression with 4 consecutive declining quarters
Plunging consumer confidence stays low Escalation of hostilities with lingering fear
Economic depression with 4 consecutive declining quarters
Plunging consumer confidence stays low Escalation of hostilities with lingering fear
“Best-case” scenario Conflict primarily resolved and/or clarified in
short term Consumer confidence rejuvenated Downturn subdued
“Best-case” scenario Conflict primarily resolved and/or clarified in
short term Consumer confidence rejuvenated Downturn subdued
Impact Scenarios
ImplicationsImplications
Market expectations of industry growth rates over the next few years considering the impact of 9/11 attacks
Further reduction in growth rates following the 9/11 attacks but recovery time is expected to be the same
Market expectations of industry growth rates over the next few years considering the impact of 9/11 attacks
Further reduction in growth rates following the 9/11 attacks but recovery time is expected to be the same
Deeper plunge in growth rates followed in some cases by a longer wait time for the growth rates to turn around
Deeper plunge in growth rates followed in some cases by a longer wait time for the growth rates to turn around
Technology sector demonstrates immediate comeback
Growth rates continue to rise but at a slower pace than in the early 1990s
Technology sector demonstrates immediate comeback
Growth rates continue to rise but at a slower pace than in the early 1990s
48
A three-stage recovery spending framework drove the development of post-9/11 trajectories for each scenario
11-Sep 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 5th Qtr 6th Qtr
Original Planned Spend
Revised Spend
Emergency Spend
Reinstate ServiceReinstate Service Rationalize InstallationRationalize Installation
Upgrade to New Standards
Upgrade to New Standards
• Incur large tactical emergency spend to restore basic services
• Address emergency needs via “patches” to systems
• Replace stopgap measures with more permanent solutions
• Install new equipment and systems to match (or surpass) original upgrade plans
ILLUSTRATIVE
ILLUSTRATIVE
STAGE 1 STAGE 2 STAGE 3
IT Spend
49
New York City’s historically close tracking of national growth rates guided the sector trajectories
ObservationsObservations
Rebuilding expense and a lower starting point were expected to drive growth rates - San Francisco and Tokyo earthquakes have witnessed such returns in their growth rates following the initial downturn
This rise is expected to arrive after a 3 or 4 quarter time lag as the rebuilding spend trickles throught he economy
New York city economy has grown faster than the national average in boom cycles and this trend is expected to continue in the next boom phase
Rebuilding expense and a lower starting point were expected to drive growth rates - San Francisco and Tokyo earthquakes have witnessed such returns in their growth rates following the initial downturn
This rise is expected to arrive after a 3 or 4 quarter time lag as the rebuilding spend trickles throught he economy
New York city economy has grown faster than the national average in boom cycles and this trend is expected to continue in the next boom phase
US and New York City GDP Growth Rates
GD
P G
row
th
Source: Economy.com, Bureau of Economic Analysis, BAH Analysis
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001E 2002E 2003E 2004E 2005E
NYC
USA
50
New redundancy communications requirements and rebuilding spend should help move technology out of the decline
$10-12B flowing into technology sector -- $230-275 MM in New York specific companies
Rebuilding spend and a lower starting point were expected to drive growth rates e.g., San Francisco and Tokyo earthquakes led to an immediate downturn in the regioanl economies, but rebuilding spend resulted drove a quick rebound in growth rates
Demand to create additional redundancy infrastructure drives most technology sub-sectors (hardware, software, services) exception being telecom services
Industries like postal services, airlines will increase their technology spending on security and redundancy needs
Industries which have traditionally been high consumers of technology will also re-evaluate their budgets to increase their spend on security/redundancy
Drive to decentralize key information will lead to increased implementation of remote communications solutions
Some larger players may acquire small companies with proprietary technologies -apply marketing $ supported by brand name to grow the market for these services
Increase in telecommuting needs will increase demand for services like home offices and video conferencing
Drivers Description
RebuildingActivities
RebuildingActivities
Additional Security/Redundancy
Additional Security/Redundancy
New remote communication needs
New remote communication needs
51
The “inertia” of maintenance vs. new IT spending is another factor – reductions come most readily from trimming new technology purchases
DiscussionDiscussion
IT spend dedicated to maintenance purposes (e.g., HW maintenance, support) is relatively “uncompressible” -- spending requirements are relatively unchangeable in the short term
When overall IT spend faces reduction pressures (e.g., economic downturn, uncertainty), spend typically must come from the New IT spend while Maintenance IT spend continues
The New IT spend area is most closely related with the Hardware and Software subsectors, moreso than with the Services subsector
IT spend dedicated to maintenance purposes (e.g., HW maintenance, support) is relatively “uncompressible” -- spending requirements are relatively unchangeable in the short term
When overall IT spend faces reduction pressures (e.g., economic downturn, uncertainty), spend typically must come from the New IT spend while Maintenance IT spend continues
The New IT spend area is most closely related with the Hardware and Software subsectors, moreso than with the Services subsector
IT Spend Reduction Scenario
Effect on Different Spend Types
0.520.48
0.32
0.48
Maintenance
New Spend
Total =1.0Total =1.0 Total =0.8Total =0.8
ILLUSTRATIVE
ILLUSTRATIVE
52
We considered IT industry perspectives that despite corporate spending pullbacks, long-term growth is inevitable
ObservationsObservations
Technology has become an integral part of business operations and firms have to spend on technology upgrade and maintenance every year
Reduction in spending as % of revenue is offset by overall increasing corporate revenues
Slower growth is driving down stock prices, however long-term forecasts indicate double-digit growth
Potential risk in New York City market as key local industries plan to reduce technology spend
Technology has become an integral part of business operations and firms have to spend on technology upgrade and maintenance every year
Reduction in spending as % of revenue is offset by overall increasing corporate revenues
Slower growth is driving down stock prices, however long-term forecasts indicate double-digit growth
Potential risk in New York City market as key local industries plan to reduce technology spend
(1) Other industries include Agriculture, Mining, Construction, Transportation, Utilities, IT, Petroleum, Services, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Transportation and Education.Note: IT spend includes corporate expenditure on hardware, software and services expenses and telecom spend includes voice and data communication expenses. Source: Gartner Group, IDC, Economy.com, Dun & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis
US IT and Telecom Spendas Avg % of Firm Revenue by Industry
Te
chn
olo
gy S
pen
d a
s a
% o
f Re
ven
ue
0%
5%
10%
15%
2000 2001 (E) 2002 (E)
Government Communications Financial ServicesRetail/Wholesale Others (1)
US IT Spend by Industry (2000)
$ 59 B
$ 112 B
$ 151 B
$ 67 B
$ 379 B
53
A simple risk-return framework enabled a prioritization of the actions
Potential Return (Financial)
Complexity and Sensitivity
Hi
HiLo
Lo
Identify participants and
implement immediately
Pick low hanging fruit
and implement
Pursue with multiple
partners or as an
industry to reduce risks
Avoid as private firms --
public sector may fund if
societal benefits exist
Prioritization Framework
54
ActionsActions
Utilizing this framework revealed that actions fostering cooperation deliver the highest return with the least complexity
Complexity and Sensitivity
1
8
2
11
5a/b
6
9
4
3
7
10
Hi
HiLo
Lo
Potential Return
(Financial)
Note: Size of bubble indicates relative impact on NYC businesses Shading indicates highest priority actions
1.) Reimburse/finance efforts of key players to rebuild while upgrading infrastructure
2.) Help companies with capacity find customers with needs -- support customer access to key providers/subcontractors for short-term requirements
3.) Upgrade capacity and capability of communications infrastructure
4.) Improve customer service, satisfaction, and customer options for communications services
5a.) Establish demand-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements
5b.) Establish supply-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements
6.) Establish new business development region with advanced technology infrastructure
7.) Provide mechanisms to help small technology sector companies take advantage of rebuilding spend
8.) Enable small companies to refocus and/or diversify to accommodate shifts in company priorities
9.) Support competition in communication services by educating businesses on available service alternatives
10.) Channel investments to technologies critical to native NYC industries
11.) Establish NYC as center of technology R&D by fostering a climate for new technology venturing
1.) Reimburse/finance efforts of key players to rebuild while upgrading infrastructure
2.) Help companies with capacity find customers with needs -- support customer access to key providers/subcontractors for short-term requirements
3.) Upgrade capacity and capability of communications infrastructure
4.) Improve customer service, satisfaction, and customer options for communications services
5a.) Establish demand-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements
5b.) Establish supply-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements
6.) Establish new business development region with advanced technology infrastructure
7.) Provide mechanisms to help small technology sector companies take advantage of rebuilding spend
8.) Enable small companies to refocus and/or diversify to accommodate shifts in company priorities
9.) Support competition in communication services by educating businesses on available service alternatives
10.) Channel investments to technologies critical to native NYC industries
11.) Establish NYC as center of technology R&D by fostering a climate for new technology venturing
Prioritization of Actions
55
To evaluate funding sources for the actions, we strove to ensure primary beneficiaries provide the majority of the investment
Ben
efi c
iary
Sec
tor
Private
Private Public
Public
Resultant Potential Funding Source
Joint
Joint
Little economic benefit for individual firms investing in these initiatives
Long-term horizon for benefits realization; e.g., 6-7 years
Typically focused on overall infrastructure improvements (e.g., universal connectivity, public transit)
Little economic benefit for individual firms investing in these initiatives
Long-term horizon for benefits realization; e.g., 6-7 years
Typically focused on overall infrastructure improvements (e.g., universal connectivity, public transit)
Community Building
Initiatives
Community Building
Initiatives
Combined Initiatives Combined Initiatives
Community benefits are indirect or a result of companies in the New York City area competing more effectively
Public sector provides incentives or funding to increase economic viability of projects for individual companies/groups of companies
Profit potential for individual companies, however long lead times limit corporate investment
Community benefits are indirect or a result of companies in the New York City area competing more effectively
Public sector provides incentives or funding to increase economic viability of projects for individual companies/groups of companies
Profit potential for individual companies, however long lead times limit corporate investment
Corporate Self-Help Initiatives
Corporate Self-Help Initiatives
Investments return tangible returns for participants
Private companies will undertake these projects since they result in shareholder value creation
May need encouragement from demand side consortia to ensure demand for new products or services provided
Investments return tangible returns for participants
Private companies will undertake these projects since they result in shareholder value creation
May need encouragement from demand side consortia to ensure demand for new products or services provided
Funding Framework
56
The highest-priority actions should be private-sector or jointly funded
Ben
efi c
iar y
Sec
tor
Private
Private Public
Public
Both
Both
11.) Establish NYC as center of technology R&D by fostering a climate for new technology venturing
11.) Establish NYC as center of technology R&D by fostering a climate for new technology venturing
Community Building
Initiatives
Community Building
Initiatives
Combined Initiatives Combined Initiatives
Corporate Self-Help Initiatives
Corporate Self-Help Initiatives
2.) Help companies with capacity find customers with needs -- support customer access to key providers/subcontractors for short-term requirements
8.) Enable small companies to refocus and/or diversify to accommodate shifts in company priorities
5a.) Establish demand-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements
5b.) Establish supply-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements
10.) Channel investments to technologies critical to native NYC industries
2.) Help companies with capacity find customers with needs -- support customer access to key providers/subcontractors for short-term requirements
8.) Enable small companies to refocus and/or diversify to accommodate shifts in company priorities
5a.) Establish demand-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements
5b.) Establish supply-side consortia to address key infrastructure requirements
10.) Channel investments to technologies critical to native NYC industries
Primary Funding SourceNote: Actions in bold indicate highest priority
1.) Reimburse/finance efforts of key players to rebuild while upgrading infrastructure
3.) Upgrade capacity and capability of communications infrastructure
4.) Improve customer service, satisfaction, and customer options for communications services
6.) Establish new business development region with advanced technology infrastructure
7.) Provide mechanisms to help small technology sector companies take advantage of rebuilding spend
9.) Support competition in communication services by educating businesses on available service alternatives
1.) Reimburse/finance efforts of key players to rebuild while upgrading infrastructure
3.) Upgrade capacity and capability of communications infrastructure
4.) Improve customer service, satisfaction, and customer options for communications services
6.) Establish new business development region with advanced technology infrastructure
7.) Provide mechanisms to help small technology sector companies take advantage of rebuilding spend
9.) Support competition in communication services by educating businesses on available service alternatives
Funding Framework
57
Appendices
A. Subsector Pre-9/11 Baseline Trends
B. Subsector Post-9/11 Projections
C. Detailed Actions
58
Appendix A. Subsector Pre-9/11 Baseline Trends
59
The IT hardware market sensitivity to the overall economy will result in reduced revenues for 2001 – recovery is expected by 2002
Pre-9/11 ObservationsPre-9/11 Observations
PC market is saturated, traditional drivers of growth are no longer applicable (e.g., enterprise desktop roll-out)
PC makers depend on increasing demands of advanced software packages and peripherals to drive growth (e.g., Windows XP, video conferencing)
Spending on storage subsystems will not see a downturn as information revolution and internet expansion will continue to drive spending on network-related storage products
Servers were expected to see a quick rebound driven by the ongoing need to build greater redundancy
PC market is saturated, traditional drivers of growth are no longer applicable (e.g., enterprise desktop roll-out)
PC makers depend on increasing demands of advanced software packages and peripherals to drive growth (e.g., Windows XP, video conferencing)
Spending on storage subsystems will not see a downturn as information revolution and internet expansion will continue to drive spending on network-related storage products
Servers were expected to see a quick rebound driven by the ongoing need to build greater redundancy
Source: Gartner Group, IDC, Economy.com, Dun & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis
Ann
ua
l IT
Ha
rdw
are
R
eve
nu
e $
(B
N)
IT HardwareAnnual Revenue
Ann
ua
l IT
Ha
rdw
are
R
eve
nu
e G
row
th (
%)
$0.0
$0.2
$0.4
$0.6
$0.8
$1.0
1999 2000 2001E 2002E 2003E 2004E 2005E
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Storage
Servers
PC
IT HardwareAnnual Revenue Growth
NYC market represents 0.50% of national
market
NYC market represents 0.50% of national
market
60
Security systems support continued double digit growth for the software sector with enterprise applications driving future growth
Pre-9/11 ObservationsPre-9/11 Observations
Current slowing growth trends attributable to three key factors:
– Slow down in PC spending
– Halt in corporate upgrades with announcement of Windows XP
– Loss of fascination with ‘e-’ trends
Security systems (e.g., firewalls, login, etc.) continue to be the number one priority for corporate IT departments
Enterprise applications such as ERP and CRM drove previous growth and will continue to drive growth in the future
Current slowing growth trends attributable to three key factors:
– Slow down in PC spending
– Halt in corporate upgrades with announcement of Windows XP
– Loss of fascination with ‘e-’ trends
Security systems (e.g., firewalls, login, etc.) continue to be the number one priority for corporate IT departments
Enterprise applications such as ERP and CRM drove previous growth and will continue to drive growth in the future
IT SoftwareAnnual Revenue and Growth Rate
Source: Gartner Group, Economy.com, IDC, Dun & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis
$3.8$4.2
$4.7
$5.4
$6.2
$6.9
$7.7
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$7
$8
$9
1999 2000 2001E 2002E 2003E 2004E 2005E
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
Revenue Revenue Growth
Ann
ua
l IT
So
ftw
are
Re
venu
e G
row
th
(%)
Ann
ua
l IT
So
ftw
are
Re
venu
e $
(B
N)
NYC market represents 4.4% of
national market
NYC market represents 4.4% of
national market
61
Demand for IT Services was expected to continue growing but at a slower pace than the mid 1990’s
Pre-9/11 ObservationsPre-9/11 Observations
Long-term outsourcing contracts provide steady source of revenue for sector
Several failures in the Internet space limited 2000 growth
Pent up demand for IT projects (e.g., systems integration, CRM, supply chain services) is expected to help growth in 2002
Large service firms (e.g., IBM, EDS) growth easily counters smaller companies
Long-term outsourcing contracts provide steady source of revenue for sector
Several failures in the Internet space limited 2000 growth
Pent up demand for IT projects (e.g., systems integration, CRM, supply chain services) is expected to help growth in 2002
Large service firms (e.g., IBM, EDS) growth easily counters smaller companies
Source: Gartner Group, IDC, Dun & Bradstreet, BAH Analysis
IT ServicesAnnual Revenue and Growth Rate
$6.1$6.7
$7.5$8.3
$9.2
$10.3
$11.4
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
1999 2000 2001E 2002E 2003E 2004E 2005E
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
Revenue Revenue Growth
Ann
ua
l IT
Se
rvic
es
Re
ven
ue
Gro
wth
(%
)
Ann
ua
l IT
Se
rvic
es
Re
ven
ue
$ (
BN
)
NYC market represents 2.1% of
national market
NYC market represents 2.1% of
national market
62
Corporate IT spending reductions hurt the high-dollar communications hardware industry
Pre-9/11 ObservationsPre-9/11 Observations
Marginal impact on New York City since none of the major manufacturers have significant operations in the city
Equipment manufacturers exacerbated demand-side issues with over production (for aggressive growth) resulting in large inventories
Revenues will continue to grow slowly or see negative growth for one to two years driven by the time required to absorb excess inventory
Current economic climate prevents many service providers from accessing capital markets to fund expansion
Continued margin pressure is expected as customers continue to reduce IT spending
Marginal impact on New York City since none of the major manufacturers have significant operations in the city
Equipment manufacturers exacerbated demand-side issues with over production (for aggressive growth) resulting in large inventories
Revenues will continue to grow slowly or see negative growth for one to two years driven by the time required to absorb excess inventory
Current economic climate prevents many service providers from accessing capital markets to fund expansion
Continued margin pressure is expected as customers continue to reduce IT spending
Source: Gartner Group, US Census Bureau , BAH Analysis
Network HardwareAnnual Revenue and Growth Rate
$4.3$4.4
$3.9
$4.3
$3.9 $4.0
$4.2
$3
$4
$5
1999 2000 2001E 2002E 2003E 2004E 2005E
-30.0%
-15.0%
0.0%
15.0%
30.0%
Revenue Revenue Growth
Ann
ua
l Ne
twor
k H
ard
war
e R
eve
nu
e G
row
th (
%)
Ann
ua
l Ne
twor
k H
ard
war
e R
eve
nu
e $
(B
N)
NYC market represents 3.7% of
national market
NYC market represents 3.7% of
national market
63
Local and LD Voice revenue continues to decline due to ongoing price competition and wireless substitutes
ObservationsObservations
Long distance price competition is eroding revenue streams across the industry
Consumers and businesses continue to adopt wireless, pagers, and email as substitutes for phone calls
Long distance price competition is eroding revenue streams across the industry
Consumers and businesses continue to adopt wireless, pagers, and email as substitutes for phone calls
Ann
ua
l Vo
ice
Se
rvic
es
Rev
en
ue
$ (
BN
)
Voice ServicesAnnual Revenue
Ann
ua
l Vo
ice
Se
rvic
es
Rev
en
ue
Gro
wth
(%
)
Source: JP Morgan H&Q and McKinsey& Co. Joint Study, BAH Analysis
$0
$2
$4
$6
2000 2001E 2002E 2003E 2004E 2005E
Local LD (IXC)
-10%
0%
10%
20%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Growth local Growth LD (IXC)
Voice ServicesAnnual Revenue Growth
NYC market represents 2.8% of national marketNYC market represents 2.8% of national market
64
High penetration levels limit new wireless subscriber growth, with rising revenues per user sustaining most carriers
Pre-9/11 ObservationsPre-9/11 Observations
Increased penetration reduces historically high growth rates
Hybrid cellular services will drive wireless revenue growth
• By 2005, 70% of users will have hybrid service up from the current 39%
• Hybrid service fees are 30% more than the wireless average
3G applications and adoption of fixed wireless will help drive future revenue growth
New wireless applications (e.g., BlueTooth) may form the future communications backbone
Increased penetration reduces historically high growth rates
Hybrid cellular services will drive wireless revenue growth
• By 2005, 70% of users will have hybrid service up from the current 39%
• Hybrid service fees are 30% more than the wireless average
3G applications and adoption of fixed wireless will help drive future revenue growth
New wireless applications (e.g., BlueTooth) may form the future communications backbone
Wireless Services Annual Revenue and Growth Rate
Note: Wireless revenues includes only voice service revenuesSource: IDC, US Census Bureau, Morgan Stanley Dean Wittier, BAH Analysis
$1.4$1.7
$1.9 $2.0$2.2 $2.4
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
2000 2001E 2002E 2003E 2004E 2005E
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
Revenue Revenue Growth ARPU Growth
Gro
wth
(%
)
Ann
ua
l Wir
ele
ss S
erv
ice
s R
eve
nu
es
$ (
BN
)
NYC market represents 2.8% of national marketNYC market represents 2.8% of national market
65
Recent CLEC failures have dampened the broadband picture, however data revenues are growing
Pre-9/11 ObservationsPre-9/11 Observations
Data services are a new market and therefore experiencing explosive growth rates - slower future growth is expected
Most of the increased revenues will be captured by the incumbents
• Industry consolidation - acquired revenues
• Lack of funding to unprofitable players
Many CLEC business models were inoperable and most never achieved profitability
Future expansions are limited by restricted access to capital
Data services are a new market and therefore experiencing explosive growth rates - slower future growth is expected
Most of the increased revenues will be captured by the incumbents
• Industry consolidation - acquired revenues
• Lack of funding to unprofitable players
Many CLEC business models were inoperable and most never achieved profitability
Future expansions are limited by restricted access to capital
Ann
ua
l Da
ta S
erv
ice
s R
eve
nu
es $
(B
N)
Data ServicesAnnual Revenue
Ann
ua
l Da
ta S
erv
ice
s R
eve
nu
es G
row
th (
%)
Source: Gartner Group, BAH Analysis
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
2000 2001E 2002E 2003E 2004E 2005E
Broadband Cable DSL/ISDN ISP
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Broadband Cable DSL/ISDN ISP
Data ServicesAnnual Revenue Growth Note: target growth rates
for 2005 in the 15-20% range
Note: target growth rates for 2005 in the 15-20%
range
66
Appendix B. Subsector Post-9/11 Projections
67
IT Hardware: Aggressive reconstruction fosters a return to quarterly growth
Post-9/11 ObservationsPost-9/11 Observations
Any significant corporate moves to locations outside the city will limit growth potential
PC growth driven by companies relocating within city and replacing lost hardware
Additional servers from redundancy and security requirements
Technology advances in out-years will accelerate hardware growth
Significant spend in this sector will go to companies outside NYC
Any significant corporate moves to locations outside the city will limit growth potential
PC growth driven by companies relocating within city and replacing lost hardware
Additional servers from redundancy and security requirements
Technology advances in out-years will accelerate hardware growth
Significant spend in this sector will go to companies outside NYC
Source: IDC’, Economy.com, BAH Analysis
Qua
rter
ly P
C
Rev
enue
Gro
wth
(%
)
New York City Quarterly PC Sub-Sector Revenue Growth
Qua
rter
ly S
erve
r
Rev
enue
Gro
wth
(%
)
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
New York City Quarterly Server Sub-Sector Revenue Growth
2000 2001E 2002E 2003E
2000 2001E 2002E 2003E
68
IT Software: New York City software sector revenues will grow when the banking sector increases IT spend
Post-9/11 ObservationsPost-9/11 Observations
Security systems (e.g., virus protection, advanced login services) were already a high priority for business customers
Redundancy and backup software expected to be major sources of growth
Additional spending on enterprise software likely to be limited
NYC software recovery dependent on banking sector – many small software firms develop specialized banking applicaitons
Security systems (e.g., virus protection, advanced login services) were already a high priority for business customers
Redundancy and backup software expected to be major sources of growth
Additional spending on enterprise software likely to be limited
NYC software recovery dependent on banking sector – many small software firms develop specialized banking applicaitons
Source: IDC’, Economy.com, BAH Analysis
Qua
rter
ly S
oftw
are
Rev
enue
Gro
wth
(%
)
New York City Quarterly SoftwareSub-Sector Revenue Growth
-5%
0%
5%
10%
2000 2001E 2002E 2003E
Annual growth still below the high 20% range of the 1990sAnnual growth still below the high 20% range of the 1990s
69
IT Services: Expect continued growth after an initial slowdown
Post-9/11 ObservationsPost-9/11 Observations
Spend shifting to security and reliability since mid-1999 due to Y2K preparation, and new viruses (e.g., Melissa virus)
Opportunities for service companies exist in all economic environments -- key factor is ability to switch service offerings quickly
After being delayed, in 2003 business process improvement related srevices (e.g., CRM) will drive growth
Spend shifting to security and reliability since mid-1999 due to Y2K preparation, and new viruses (e.g., Melissa virus)
Opportunities for service companies exist in all economic environments -- key factor is ability to switch service offerings quickly
After being delayed, in 2003 business process improvement related srevices (e.g., CRM) will drive growth
Qua
rte
rly S
erv
ice
s
Rev
en
ue
Gro
wth
(%
)
New York City Quarterly Services Sub-Sector Revenue Growth
-5%
0%
5%
10%
Source: IDC’, Economy.com, BAH Analysis
2000 2001E 2002E 2003E
70
Telecom Hardware: Creation of a more serviceable, robust, and redundant data infrastructure will drive telecom hardware growth
Post-9/11 ObservationsPost-9/11 Observations
Sector affected by limited availability of capital markets funding for wireless, CLEC, or internet-related expansions
Rebuilding initiatives will require significant amounts of high-end telecom equipment
New priorities on redundancy and disaster recovery will further drive sales
Clearing inventory will delay company benefits from rebuilding sales
Sector affected by limited availability of capital markets funding for wireless, CLEC, or internet-related expansions
Rebuilding initiatives will require significant amounts of high-end telecom equipment
New priorities on redundancy and disaster recovery will further drive sales
Clearing inventory will delay company benefits from rebuilding sales
Qua
rte
rly T
ele
com
H
ard
war
e
Re
ven
ue
Gro
wth
(%
)
New York City Quarterly Telecom Hardware Sub-Sector Revenue Growth
Source: IDC, Economy.com, BAH Analysis
-5%
0%
5%
10%
2000 2001E 2002E 2003E
‘95 to ‘99 growth rates averaged ~16%
‘95 to ‘99 growth rates averaged ~16%
71
Telecom Voice: Voice will not grow, though losses may occur if customer migration out of the city occurs
Post-9/11 ObservationsPost-9/11 Observations
Voice service revenues unaffected by attack -- loss from service disruptions is minimal compared to base volumes
Some increase from additional video conferencing or telecommuniting, however these increases will be too small to affect the overall base
New York sector will be hurt if significant movement of telecom intensive industries (banking, real estate, wholesale) occurs
Continued (and increased) substitution of wireless VOIP and other technologies further erodes revenues here
Potential for companies to stick with larger players (e.g., Verizon) in the short run, limiting the erosion
Voice service revenues unaffected by attack -- loss from service disruptions is minimal compared to base volumes
Some increase from additional video conferencing or telecommuniting, however these increases will be too small to affect the overall base
New York sector will be hurt if significant movement of telecom intensive industries (banking, real estate, wholesale) occurs
Continued (and increased) substitution of wireless VOIP and other technologies further erodes revenues here
Potential for companies to stick with larger players (e.g., Verizon) in the short run, limiting the erosion
Qua
rte
rly V
oic
e R
eve
nu
e
Gro
wth
(%
)
New York City Voice Sub-SectorQuarterly Revenue Growth
Source: IDC, Economy.com, BAH Analysis
-5%
0%
5%
2000 2001E 2002E 2003E
72
Telecom Wireless: Growth is dependent on 3G deployment
Post-9/11 ObservationsPost-9/11 Observations
Medium to long term growth is dependent on next-generation / 3G roll out (higher bandwidth enables new services; e.g., 802.11b, Bluetooth, fixed wireless)
Access to capital for expansion in these areas was already limited, the attacks will delay a greater opening of the capital markets to most providers
Minor increases in usage as a result of the attacks will not impact overall sector
National players (e.g., Sprint, SBC) still growing
Medium to long term growth is dependent on next-generation / 3G roll out (higher bandwidth enables new services; e.g., 802.11b, Bluetooth, fixed wireless)
Access to capital for expansion in these areas was already limited, the attacks will delay a greater opening of the capital markets to most providers
Minor increases in usage as a result of the attacks will not impact overall sector
National players (e.g., Sprint, SBC) still growing
Qua
rte
rly W
irel
ess
R
eve
nu
e G
row
th (
%)
New York City Quarterly Wireless
Sub-Sector Revenue Growth
Source: IDC, Economy.com, BAH Analysis
0%
2%
4%
6%
2000 2001E 2002E 2003E
73
Telecom Data: Deployment of advanced infrastructure and availability of cable data to small businesses will drive revenues
Post-9/11 ObservationsPost-9/11 Observations
While growth is decelerating, quarterly levels are still very high (annualized over 30% for 2002)
Businesses expected to invest in redundant wireless infrastrucutres, or wireless technologoes for disaster recovery
Growth may be supported by need to build redundant “national security communications grid”
Potential long-term limits on capital market access prevents alternative carriers from making inroads into this subsector
While growth is decelerating, quarterly levels are still very high (annualized over 30% for 2002)
Businesses expected to invest in redundant wireless infrastrucutres, or wireless technologoes for disaster recovery
Growth may be supported by need to build redundant “national security communications grid”
Potential long-term limits on capital market access prevents alternative carriers from making inroads into this subsector
Qua
rte
rly D
ata
Re
ven
ue
G
row
th (
%)
New York City Quarterly Data Sub-Sector Revenue Growth
Source: IDC’, Economy.com, BAH Analysis
0%
5%
10%
15%
2000 2001E 2002E 2003E
This is still large growth -- but is primarily shifted to incumbents
This is still large growth -- but is primarily shifted to incumbents
74
Appendix C. Detailed Actions
75
1.) HIGH-PRIORITY ACTION – Reimburse/finance efforts of key players to rebuild while upgrading
Implementation Actions
Implementation Actions
Key CostsKey Costs
Key BenefitsKey Benefits
Develop guidelines for new infrastructure standards allowing service providers and corporations to “leapfrog” technology cycles
• New wireless standards• Next generation wireline
Define scope of reimbursements -- e.g., minimum thresholds for reimbursement, damage types within scope Determine key sector companies and estimate expenses suffered due to extensive infrastructure damage from 9/11
through research study or company-initiated application for assistance Work with settlement and insurance companies to communicate process for distribution of reimbursement funds Administer and monitor approved use of reimbursement funds
Develop guidelines for new infrastructure standards allowing service providers and corporations to “leapfrog” technology cycles
• New wireless standards• Next generation wireline
Define scope of reimbursements -- e.g., minimum thresholds for reimbursement, damage types within scope Determine key sector companies and estimate expenses suffered due to extensive infrastructure damage from 9/11
through research study or company-initiated application for assistance Work with settlement and insurance companies to communicate process for distribution of reimbursement funds Administer and monitor approved use of reimbursement funds
Total estimates exceed $2B for service providers, $10B for corporations Variable reimbursement costs depending on scope of repair/replacement effort; general administrative costs for
reimbursement program, including coordination of repair/replacement resources ~1 mgmt-level FTEs (plus small staff of 2-3 FTEs) to scope, develop and administer the program over 12-24 months Overall Cost Estimate: $10-12B Source of funds: Public sector and insurance companies
Total estimates exceed $2B for service providers, $10B for corporations Variable reimbursement costs depending on scope of repair/replacement effort; general administrative costs for
reimbursement program, including coordination of repair/replacement resources ~1 mgmt-level FTEs (plus small staff of 2-3 FTEs) to scope, develop and administer the program over 12-24 months Overall Cost Estimate: $10-12B Source of funds: Public sector and insurance companies
Provides short-term financial support to sector companies experiencing significant infrastructure damage Restores IT/Telecom services and infrastructure while instituting higher levels of customer service
Provides short-term financial support to sector companies experiencing significant infrastructure damage Restores IT/Telecom services and infrastructure while instituting higher levels of customer service
FeasibilityFeasibility
High Government (both state and federal) bailout/disaster relief funds are likely to cover reimbursement needs, in conjunction
with any applicable insurance payments
High Government (both state and federal) bailout/disaster relief funds are likely to cover reimbursement needs, in conjunction
with any applicable insurance payments
ActionActionReimburse/finance the efforts of key players to rebuild or repair damaged/destroyed infrastructure, getting NYC services “back to normal” while upgrading current infrastructureReimburse/finance the efforts of key players to rebuild or repair damaged/destroyed infrastructure, getting NYC services “back to normal” while upgrading current infrastructure
76
2.) Help companies with capacity find customers with needs – support customer access to key providers/subcontractors
Implementation Actions
Implementation Actions
Key CostsKey Costs
Key BenefitsKey Benefits
Establish resource for providers of IT and telecom services to more easily reach customers requiring such services; e.g.:• Online facility• Temporary referral agency (non-technology option)• Combination
Determine eligibility guidelines for providers (quality level guarantees) Communicate availability of program to providers and potential customers throughout NYC If possible, leverage existing contact engine, similar to hotjobs.com, to facilitate rapid deployment
Establish resource for providers of IT and telecom services to more easily reach customers requiring such services; e.g.:• Online facility• Temporary referral agency (non-technology option)• Combination
Determine eligibility guidelines for providers (quality level guarantees) Communicate availability of program to providers and potential customers throughout NYC If possible, leverage existing contact engine, similar to hotjobs.com, to facilitate rapid deployment
Variable -- for technology option, could be up to $2MM for new technology platform, less if partnering with established player
Non-technology option requires small office staff (3-5 FTEs) ~1 management-level FTEs to develop and administer program Minimal ongoing costs as all transactions are negotiated between parties Overall Cost Estimate: $15-17MM Source of funds: Private Consortium or Public sector
Variable -- for technology option, could be up to $2MM for new technology platform, less if partnering with established player
Non-technology option requires small office staff (3-5 FTEs) ~1 management-level FTEs to develop and administer program Minimal ongoing costs as all transactions are negotiated between parties Overall Cost Estimate: $15-17MM Source of funds: Private Consortium or Public sector
Enables small IT service providers to better compete with larger players for short-term increase in demand in certain areas Reduces costs for small to medium business to find quality IT service providers that are available to help them May develop into long-term facility to foster business development going forward
Enables small IT service providers to better compete with larger players for short-term increase in demand in certain areas Reduces costs for small to medium business to find quality IT service providers that are available to help them May develop into long-term facility to foster business development going forward
FeasibilityFeasibility
Moderate (technology option) to High Total cost appears to be small, primarily basic administration expenses Business organizations such as NYC Partnership could facilitate/host services relatively easily
Moderate (technology option) to High Total cost appears to be small, primarily basic administration expenses Business organizations such as NYC Partnership could facilitate/host services relatively easily
ActionActionHelp companies with capacity find customers with needs -- support customer access to key providers/subcontractors for short-term requirementsHelp companies with capacity find customers with needs -- support customer access to key providers/subcontractors for short-term requirements
77
3.) Upgrade capacity/capabilities of the communications infrastructure
Implementation Actions
Implementation Actions
Key CostsKey Costs
Key BenefitsKey Benefits
Coordinate with industry leaders/experts to identify critical next generation initiatives/upgrade opportunities ready to deploy and valuable to business community -- from both redundancy as well as improved services perspectives
Identify players with deployment capabilities for next generation technology infrastructure in Lower Manhattan -- allow self nomination or conduct independent research study
Develop action plans, milestones for deployment of various technologies -- consider any lower Manhattan-specific implementation obstacles
Determine overall deployment costs for various infrastructure elements
Coordinate with industry leaders/experts to identify critical next generation initiatives/upgrade opportunities ready to deploy and valuable to business community -- from both redundancy as well as improved services perspectives
Identify players with deployment capabilities for next generation technology infrastructure in Lower Manhattan -- allow self nomination or conduct independent research study
Develop action plans, milestones for deployment of various technologies -- consider any lower Manhattan-specific implementation obstacles
Determine overall deployment costs for various infrastructure elements
Will be costly, as upgrade efforts were previously avoided due to lack of economic viability Additional coordination costs to work with numerous companies Minimal logistic and other operating costs Overall Cost Estimate: $2-3MM Source of funds: Private consortium, Public sector, and/or Individual companies
Will be costly, as upgrade efforts were previously avoided due to lack of economic viability Additional coordination costs to work with numerous companies Minimal logistic and other operating costs Overall Cost Estimate: $2-3MM Source of funds: Private consortium, Public sector, and/or Individual companies
Performance of existing NYC businesses is likely to improve due to operational advantages provided by advanced infrastructure
New businesses (both high-tech and other) will be more likely to locate in New York for similar reasons Highly-skilled labor resources will find relocation within NYC to be relatively more attractive as well
Performance of existing NYC businesses is likely to improve due to operational advantages provided by advanced infrastructure
New businesses (both high-tech and other) will be more likely to locate in New York for similar reasons Highly-skilled labor resources will find relocation within NYC to be relatively more attractive as well
FeasibilityFeasibility
Low Cost to deploy new infrastructure/replace existing infrastructure is high In some cases deployment may cause delays in reconnection of services and/or disruptions in basic service already in
place
Low Cost to deploy new infrastructure/replace existing infrastructure is high In some cases deployment may cause delays in reconnection of services and/or disruptions in basic service already in
place
ActionActionUpgrade capacity and capability of communications infrastructure (e.g., 3G, 802.11, voice-over-cable, VOIP, upgraded wireline capacity, Bell Atlantic Net)Upgrade capacity and capability of communications infrastructure (e.g., 3G, 802.11, voice-over-cable, VOIP, upgraded wireline capacity, Bell Atlantic Net)
78
4.) Improve customer service, satisfaction, and customer options for communications services
Implementation Actions
Implementation Actions
Key CostsKey Costs
Key BenefitsKey Benefits
Identify new key industry benchmarks and best practices for customer service and satisfaction -- customer service performance during recent crises has increased service levels and reduced cycle time expectations
Establish minimum standards to satisfy new requirements based on customer feedback, industry performance Increase funds and/or reengineer operations to accommodate new customer service and satisfaction requirements
(e.g., implementing new systems and resources to accommodate new billing options) On an ongoing basis, monitor key performance metrics and improve processes
Identify new key industry benchmarks and best practices for customer service and satisfaction -- customer service performance during recent crises has increased service levels and reduced cycle time expectations
Establish minimum standards to satisfy new requirements based on customer feedback, industry performance Increase funds and/or reengineer operations to accommodate new customer service and satisfaction requirements
(e.g., implementing new systems and resources to accommodate new billing options) On an ongoing basis, monitor key performance metrics and improve processes
~4 FTE over 2 months to research best practices and understand key performance thresholds Additional labor, equipment/system costs associated with improving customer service (dependent on service levels
required); e.g.:• Increased staff• Upgraded systems• Enhanced services
Overall Cost Estimate: $0.5MM Source of funds: Private consortium or individual companies (e.g., Verizon, AT&T)
~4 FTE over 2 months to research best practices and understand key performance thresholds Additional labor, equipment/system costs associated with improving customer service (dependent on service levels
required); e.g.:• Increased staff• Upgraded systems• Enhanced services
Overall Cost Estimate: $0.5MM Source of funds: Private consortium or individual companies (e.g., Verizon, AT&T)
Companies throughout NYC (and potentially the tri-state area) gain better voice and data service to conduct business, increasing their overall economic benefit to the city
New York City business infrastructure is improved Communications -- Infrastructure limitations removed as barrier to locating business in New York City
Companies throughout NYC (and potentially the tri-state area) gain better voice and data service to conduct business, increasing their overall economic benefit to the city
New York City business infrastructure is improved Communications -- Infrastructure limitations removed as barrier to locating business in New York City
FeasibilityFeasibility
Low/Medium Service providers must commit to providing better service Customers must be willing to pay for increased costs Creative solutions for cost sharing may be available
Low/Medium Service providers must commit to providing better service Customers must be willing to pay for increased costs Creative solutions for cost sharing may be available
ActionActionImprove customer service, satisfaction, and customer options for communications services (billing options, call center performance, etc.)Improve customer service, satisfaction, and customer options for communications services (billing options, call center performance, etc.)
79
5a / 5b.) HIGH PRIORITY ACTION – Establish business and service-provider consortia to address infrastructure requirements
ActionActionEstablish business and service-provider (demand and supply) consortia to address infrastructure requirementsEstablish business and service-provider (demand and supply) consortia to address infrastructure requirements
Implementation Actions
Implementation Actions
Solicit participants, from key businesses, service providers, and equipment manufacturers (e.g., Large Financial Services companies, Verizon, AT&T, Lucent, AOL) to ensure buy-iin from all key consituents
Business and service provider consortia should operate jointly and independently to determine constituents specific needs Suggested agenda items:
• Disaster recover and survivability planning• Capacity requirements and constraints• New technology requirements and implementation methods
Suggested action-item categories:• Methods for funding potentially non-economically beneficial activities (e.g., redundancy creation) by individual members• Required / Suggested policy changes• Specific responsibilities for implementation by member companies (e.g., client corporations required to upgrade so
service provider investments in new technologies will have a market)
Solicit participants, from key businesses, service providers, and equipment manufacturers (e.g., Large Financial Services companies, Verizon, AT&T, Lucent, AOL) to ensure buy-iin from all key consituents
Business and service provider consortia should operate jointly and independently to determine constituents specific needs Suggested agenda items:
• Disaster recover and survivability planning• Capacity requirements and constraints• New technology requirements and implementation methods
Suggested action-item categories:• Methods for funding potentially non-economically beneficial activities (e.g., redundancy creation) by individual members• Required / Suggested policy changes• Specific responsibilities for implementation by member companies (e.g., client corporations required to upgrade so
service provider investments in new technologies will have a market)
Key CostsKey Costs
Key BenefitsKey Benefits
Establishment of consortia and coordination costs should incur minimal costs ~1 management-level FTE to help coordinate key players Overall Cost Estimate: $4-6MM Source of funds: Private consortia/key individual company members
Establishment of consortia and coordination costs should incur minimal costs ~1 management-level FTE to help coordinate key players Overall Cost Estimate: $4-6MM Source of funds: Private consortia/key individual company members
Enables greater infrastructure redundancy and advanced capabilities without placing undue burden on supply-side sector companies to invest capital with no expectation of reasonable return
Potentially, provides valuable precedent for greater cooperation between supply-side sector companies and demand-side industries for future issues
Provide forum to develop future disaster recovery plans
Enables greater infrastructure redundancy and advanced capabilities without placing undue burden on supply-side sector companies to invest capital with no expectation of reasonable return
Potentially, provides valuable precedent for greater cooperation between supply-side sector companies and demand-side industries for future issues
Provide forum to develop future disaster recovery plans
FeasibilityFeasibility
High Cost to establish consortia is minimal, and cost to deploy redundancy should be matched as best as possible with
potential for increased revenue/earnings to supply-side companies Allows greater redundancy to be built without public-sector intervention
High Cost to establish consortia is minimal, and cost to deploy redundancy should be matched as best as possible with
potential for increased revenue/earnings to supply-side companies Allows greater redundancy to be built without public-sector intervention
80
6.) HIGH-PRIORITY ACTION – Establish new business development region with advanced technology infrastructure
Implementation Actions
Implementation Actions
Key CostsKey Costs
Key BenefitsKey Benefits
Identify candidate regions for establishment of business development area, based on value to city, existing infrastructure, business demand
Identify key sector companies to understand key technologies available/feasible for deployment; work with them to prioritize
Develop staged implementation plan for selected areas and technologies Incorporate needs of small business (technology and non-technology) in development zone
Identify candidate regions for establishment of business development area, based on value to city, existing infrastructure, business demand
Identify key sector companies to understand key technologies available/feasible for deployment; work with them to prioritize
Develop staged implementation plan for selected areas and technologies Incorporate needs of small business (technology and non-technology) in development zone
2 FTEs for 3 months to research and evaluate potential areas , as well as work with sector companies to understand candidate technologies and advantages provided by each
Variable deployment costs depending on number of areas to be established and scale; should be less than ~$50M for establishment of single small zone
Overall Cost Estimate: $30-50MM Source of funds: Private sector in partnership with public sector funding
2 FTEs for 3 months to research and evaluate potential areas , as well as work with sector companies to understand candidate technologies and advantages provided by each
Variable deployment costs depending on number of areas to be established and scale; should be less than ~$50M for establishment of single small zone
Overall Cost Estimate: $30-50MM Source of funds: Private sector in partnership with public sector funding
Allows small companies to leverage leading technologies in operations and/or service offerings Provides key selling point for NYC to potential small business community members, vs. other regions Encourages development/testing of innovative technologies on limited basis within NYC
Allows small companies to leverage leading technologies in operations and/or service offerings Provides key selling point for NYC to potential small business community members, vs. other regions Encourages development/testing of innovative technologies on limited basis within NYC
FeasibilityFeasibility
Moderate Scope must be managed to keep costs reasonable Determination of appropriate locations for establishment of new zones may ultimately be more political than
economical
Moderate Scope must be managed to keep costs reasonable Determination of appropriate locations for establishment of new zones may ultimately be more political than
economical
ActionActionEstablish new business development region (or regions) within New York City, with advanced technology infrastructure (e.g., 802.11B system) -- focus on supporting small businessesEstablish new business development region (or regions) within New York City, with advanced technology infrastructure (e.g., 802.11B system) -- focus on supporting small businesses
81
7.) Provide mechanisms to help small technology sector companies take advantage of rebuilding spend
Implementation Actions
Implementation Actions
Key CostsKey Costs
Key BenefitsKey Benefits
Establish “NYC hometown provider” (or similar) network of rebuilding service providers to enable small providers to demonstrate quality
Provide screening based on financial health, customer satisfaction, etc. to ensure quality of service providers Provide customer companies with financial incentives for the use of “hometown providers”; e.g.,
• tax benefits• discounted rates• service bundling opportunities
Publicize availability and legitimacy of program to customers, integrate cross-marketing into member companies’ sales efforts where possible
Establish “NYC hometown provider” (or similar) network of rebuilding service providers to enable small providers to demonstrate quality
Provide screening based on financial health, customer satisfaction, etc. to ensure quality of service providers Provide customer companies with financial incentives for the use of “hometown providers”; e.g.,
• tax benefits• discounted rates• service bundling opportunities
Publicize availability and legitimacy of program to customers, integrate cross-marketing into member companies’ sales efforts where possible
~1 mgmt-level FTE to set up and administer program, coordinate activities between members, certify and review membership applicants
Small (~$0.5M) budget to launch program with small administrative staff Overall Cost Estimate: $.5-.75 MM Source of funds: Public sector and/or industry consortium (perhaps through membership fees or shared profit pool)
~1 mgmt-level FTE to set up and administer program, coordinate activities between members, certify and review membership applicants
Small (~$0.5M) budget to launch program with small administrative staff Overall Cost Estimate: $.5-.75 MM Source of funds: Public sector and/or industry consortium (perhaps through membership fees or shared profit pool)
Preserves viability of small companies that may lack brand recognition and/or marketing muscle of larger players Ensures competitive market for services, reducing time and cost for customers requiring extraordinary services to
execute rebuilding process
Preserves viability of small companies that may lack brand recognition and/or marketing muscle of larger players Ensures competitive market for services, reducing time and cost for customers requiring extraordinary services to
execute rebuilding process
FeasibilityFeasibility
Moderate Costs appear to be relatively low Determining appropriate certification criteria, as well as coordinating members effectively, may prove to be difficult
political obstacle
Moderate Costs appear to be relatively low Determining appropriate certification criteria, as well as coordinating members effectively, may prove to be difficult
political obstacle
ActionActionProvide mechanisms to help small technology sector companies take advantage of rebuilding spend; allow smaller firms to compete more effectively with larger established corporationsProvide mechanisms to help small technology sector companies take advantage of rebuilding spend; allow smaller firms to compete more effectively with larger established corporations
82
8.) Enable small companies to refocus and/or diversify to accommodate shifts in company priorities
Implementation Actions
Implementation Actions
Key CostsKey Costs
Key BenefitsKey Benefits
Identify specific companies adversely affected by shifts in corporate priorities resulting from 9/11 -- allow companies to submit applications, or execute independent research study to determine this
Analyze/understand company (or company groups if appropriate) situations to develop possible refocusing/diversification opportunities on case-by-case basis
Determine extent/type of funding and assistance available vs. required (e.g., professional services, direct funding, networking assistance)
Communicate assistance program options to relevant companies, help to coordinate delivery
Identify specific companies adversely affected by shifts in corporate priorities resulting from 9/11 -- allow companies to submit applications, or execute independent research study to determine this
Analyze/understand company (or company groups if appropriate) situations to develop possible refocusing/diversification opportunities on case-by-case basis
Determine extent/type of funding and assistance available vs. required (e.g., professional services, direct funding, networking assistance)
Communicate assistance program options to relevant companies, help to coordinate delivery
Total refocusing costs variable depending on level of assistance required by identified companies and extent to which leveraging of economies of scale is possible
~2 management-level FTEs over 12-24 months to develop and administer program General administrative costs for program (small office of 3-5 FTEs), including external resource coordination Overall Cost Estimate: $400K - $500K Source of funds: Private Consortium
Total refocusing costs variable depending on level of assistance required by identified companies and extent to which leveraging of economies of scale is possible
~2 management-level FTEs over 12-24 months to develop and administer program General administrative costs for program (small office of 3-5 FTEs), including external resource coordination Overall Cost Estimate: $400K - $500K Source of funds: Private Consortium
Provides key temporary/transitional resources to small and medium sized companies, allowing them to survive and potentially expand into higher-growth areas
Provides clients of new high-priority services with more service options and greater provider competition Enables companies within the region to better exploit new market opportunities long-term through increased networking
and diversification of skill set
Provides key temporary/transitional resources to small and medium sized companies, allowing them to survive and potentially expand into higher-growth areas
Provides clients of new high-priority services with more service options and greater provider competition Enables companies within the region to better exploit new market opportunities long-term through increased networking
and diversification of skill set
FeasibilityFeasibility
Low Direct benefit to city is unclear Ability to raise significant funds is questionable Cost and complexity appear to be unreasonably high However, certain professional and/or business associations may find this attractive
Low Direct benefit to city is unclear Ability to raise significant funds is questionable Cost and complexity appear to be unreasonably high However, certain professional and/or business associations may find this attractive
ActionActionEnable small companies to refocus and/or diversify for short- to medium-term, as a result of new shifts in company priorities (e.g., shift toward increased security spending)Enable small companies to refocus and/or diversify for short- to medium-term, as a result of new shifts in company priorities (e.g., shift toward increased security spending)
83
9.) Support competition in communication services through education of businesses on available service alternatives
Implementation Actions
Implementation Actions
Key CostsKey Costs
Key BenefitsKey Benefits
Identify key services for which small businesses typically have difficulty understanding benefits and/or locating suitable providers (e.g., advanced/alternative voice services, high-value IT deployment and maintenance services)
Coordinate with industry leaders to develop/understand key benefits of various technologies to typical small-business owners -- leverage existing marketing efforts
Develop resources (company-sponsored or otherwise) to communicate all available options and key benefits -- may be print materials, online, broadcast advertising campaign, etc.
Identify key undeserved geographic areas within NYC for relevant technologies Establish guidelines for private investment and public-sector subsidies to expand/accelerate infrastructure deployment
Identify key services for which small businesses typically have difficulty understanding benefits and/or locating suitable providers (e.g., advanced/alternative voice services, high-value IT deployment and maintenance services)
Coordinate with industry leaders to develop/understand key benefits of various technologies to typical small-business owners -- leverage existing marketing efforts
Develop resources (company-sponsored or otherwise) to communicate all available options and key benefits -- may be print materials, online, broadcast advertising campaign, etc.
Identify key undeserved geographic areas within NYC for relevant technologies Establish guidelines for private investment and public-sector subsidies to expand/accelerate infrastructure deployment
~1 mgmt-level FTE over 6 months to determine key areas, design and administer program, in addition to small staff for materials creation (2-3 FTEs)
Basic administration costs Costs to create educational campaign; these can include:
• Printing and distribution costs• Technology support and maintenance costs• Media campaign creative and production costs
Overall Cost Estimate: $100-110MM Source of funds: Public sector or private consortium
~1 mgmt-level FTE over 6 months to determine key areas, design and administer program, in addition to small staff for materials creation (2-3 FTEs)
Basic administration costs Costs to create educational campaign; these can include:
• Printing and distribution costs• Technology support and maintenance costs• Media campaign creative and production costs
Overall Cost Estimate: $100-110MM Source of funds: Public sector or private consortium
Existing small ventures in NYC are provided with key information to enable their survival and success New technology ventures may be attracted to NYC area due to marketing/education infrastructure in place to
communicate new technology benefits to potential customers
Existing small ventures in NYC are provided with key information to enable their survival and success New technology ventures may be attracted to NYC area due to marketing/education infrastructure in place to
communicate new technology benefits to potential customers
FeasibilityFeasibility
Low Challenge/political conflicts in identifying key technologies to espouse, and evaluating their true benefits vs. costs, is
significant Costs, however, should be minimal compared to other initiatives
Low Challenge/political conflicts in identifying key technologies to espouse, and evaluating their true benefits vs. costs, is
significant Costs, however, should be minimal compared to other initiatives
ActionActionSupport competition in communication services by educating businesses on available service alternativesSupport competition in communication services by educating businesses on available service alternatives
84
10.) HIGH-PRIORITY ACTION – Channel investments to technologies critical to native NYC industries
Implementation Actions
Implementation Actions
Key CostsKey Costs
Key BenefitsKey Benefits
Assemble industry consortium to identify key key support technology support areas in which to channel investments Selectively invest -- on individual company basis, aggressively utilize available funds to pursue these areas (shift
away from low-growth but potentially higher-revenue areas) Supplement these actions with support from the public sector; e.g.:
• Provide tax incentives for investment in emerging high-growth areas• Utilize existing public sector vehicles to provide growth capital (e.g., SBA-type loan guarantees, etc.)
Assemble industry consortium to identify key key support technology support areas in which to channel investments Selectively invest -- on individual company basis, aggressively utilize available funds to pursue these areas (shift
away from low-growth but potentially higher-revenue areas) Supplement these actions with support from the public sector; e.g.:
• Provide tax incentives for investment in emerging high-growth areas• Utilize existing public sector vehicles to provide growth capital (e.g., SBA-type loan guarantees, etc.)
Lower investment in low-growth but proven areas may decrease ongoing cash position and flexibility No direct incremental costs Source of funds: Individual companies, Public sector (if provides incentives)
Lower investment in low-growth but proven areas may decrease ongoing cash position and flexibility No direct incremental costs Source of funds: Individual companies, Public sector (if provides incentives)
Provides continued funding to critical support technology areas, to ensure NYC industries are not “left behind” by more technologically advanced players elsewhere
Helps to retain skilled high-tech talent pool within NYC area
Provides continued funding to critical support technology areas, to ensure NYC industries are not “left behind” by more technologically advanced players elsewhere
Helps to retain skilled high-tech talent pool within NYC area
FeasibilityFeasibility
Moderate Key high-growth areas may vary significantly from company to company; investments may be so different as to not
provide tangible benefits Costs should be relatively small, as includes primarily incremental additions to investments that would have been
made otherwise
Moderate Key high-growth areas may vary significantly from company to company; investments may be so different as to not
provide tangible benefits Costs should be relatively small, as includes primarily incremental additions to investments that would have been
made otherwise
ActionActionChannel investments to the technologies critical to native NYC industries, establishing an industry-wide commitment to forward-looking areas that will advance these industriesChannel investments to the technologies critical to native NYC industries, establishing an industry-wide commitment to forward-looking areas that will advance these industries
85
11.) Establish NYC as the center of Finance and Media technology R&D by fostering a climate for new technology venturing
Implementation Actions
Implementation Actions
Key CostsKey Costs
Key BenefitsKey Benefits
Establish R&D coordination office• To attract and foster R&D activities throughout NYC• To ensure communication/cooperation between academic, public-sector, and commercial players for given R&D efforts
Provide public sector-supported financial incentives (tax, loans, etc.) for R&D spending by companies, with clear incentives to participate in NYC-wide programs
Develop and implement program to ensure access to home-grown capital through private-sector financial institutions Identify technology priorities which have significant relevance to NYC industries and develop a set of venturing initiatives Establish ongoing relationships and program to coordinate development with research talent pool/resources in local area (e.g.,
research universities)
Establish R&D coordination office• To attract and foster R&D activities throughout NYC• To ensure communication/cooperation between academic, public-sector, and commercial players for given R&D efforts
Provide public sector-supported financial incentives (tax, loans, etc.) for R&D spending by companies, with clear incentives to participate in NYC-wide programs
Develop and implement program to ensure access to home-grown capital through private-sector financial institutions Identify technology priorities which have significant relevance to NYC industries and develop a set of venturing initiatives Establish ongoing relationships and program to coordinate development with research talent pool/resources in local area (e.g.,
research universities)
2 FTEs over 12 months to determine key improvements areas, design and administer program; 1 FTE ongoing Ongoing administration and coordination efforts will have to be provided through permanent group of public-sector and/or private-
sector staff Overall Cost Estimate: $300-400K Source of funds: Private companies and/or public-sector
2 FTEs over 12 months to determine key improvements areas, design and administer program; 1 FTE ongoing Ongoing administration and coordination efforts will have to be provided through permanent group of public-sector and/or private-
sector staff Overall Cost Estimate: $300-400K Source of funds: Private companies and/or public-sector
Positions NYC as technological focal point, bringing in individuals and companies with innovative ideas/solutions Provides NYC with a continuously improving technology infrastructure, attracting new businesses and helping retain existing
businesses Enables small businesses to more easily obtain/leverage services that might otherwise only be available to large businesses with
greater resources to spend on infrastructure Retains entrepreneurial talent pool Provides existing NYC small ventures an advantage over other regions
Positions NYC as technological focal point, bringing in individuals and companies with innovative ideas/solutions Provides NYC with a continuously improving technology infrastructure, attracting new businesses and helping retain existing
businesses Enables small businesses to more easily obtain/leverage services that might otherwise only be available to large businesses with
greater resources to spend on infrastructure Retains entrepreneurial talent pool Provides existing NYC small ventures an advantage over other regions
FeasibilityFeasibility
Low Costs may be prohibitive (especially wrt physical R&D centers) without significant public-sector participation Important to achieve “critical mass” in R&D participants (especially local research talent pool) to make this successful and self-
perpetuating; otherwise, will drain funds for little benefit
Low Costs may be prohibitive (especially wrt physical R&D centers) without significant public-sector participation Important to achieve “critical mass” in R&D participants (especially local research talent pool) to make this successful and self-
perpetuating; otherwise, will drain funds for little benefit
ActionActionEstablish NYC as center of Finance and Media technology R&D (e.g., foster a climate for new technology venturing, facilitate R&D investment and development of local talent, provide incentives to companies/entities conduction NYC centric technology R&D activities)
Establish NYC as center of Finance and Media technology R&D (e.g., foster a climate for new technology venturing, facilitate R&D investment and development of local talent, provide incentives to companies/entities conduction NYC centric technology R&D activities)