Upload
ruby-noreen-gibbs
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Joint Initiative for Corporate
Accountability and Workers Rights
Training Seminar Turkey 2006
Module 1
2
Why are we here?
Purpose of this seminar
• To inform local stakeholders about Jo-In and its 6 member organizations
• To encourage effective use of these systems to improve workplace conditions
Intr
od
uct
ion
3
Why are we here?
Intr
od
uct
ion
What the seminar provides
• Overview of the 6 international organizations that founded the Joint Initiative (Jo-In)
• Guidance for using complaints mechanisms
• Information about the Jo-In project in Turkey
4
Contents: Module 1• The global context
• Specialized terminology used in this field
• The 6 organizations • Membership and governance
• Approaches
• Code contents
• Auditing and remediation
• Disclosure and public reporting
Intr
od
uct
ion
5
Contents: Module 2
• Jo-In project in Turkey – how it works
• Using complaints systems to address workplace violations
• Imaginary scenarios to practice using these systems
Intr
od
uct
ion
6
How’s it work?
Seminar ground rules
• Participate in two full days of seminar
• Respect each others’ views
• Respect time limits (including breaks!)
• Questions are welcome
• Share your experiences
• There are no wrong answers
Intr
od
uct
ion
7
Testing our “reporting skills”
• Find someone you do not already know. Take 7 minutes to exchange information with them regarding the following:
Name, organizational affiliation
Where the person is from What they seek to learn in this seminar
A single fact they already know about one of the six organizations covered in this training
• Introduce that person to the group in less than one minute.
Getting to know one another
Intr
od
uct
ion
8
The context in which we work
In this section, we briefly review:
• International worker rights
• How international standards were developed
• International legal framework for enforcement
• Challenges posed by globalization
• Innovative responses to globalization to support worker rights
Glo
bal
Co
nte
xt
9
• Freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining
• No forced labor
• No discrimination
• No child labor
Glo
bal
Co
nte
xt Basic worker rights
Are universal human rights recognized by almost all countries worldwide.
10
Are included in a host of international agreements, including:
Glo
bal
Co
nte
xt Basic worker rights
Recognized by more than 170 countries
• UN Human Rights Declaration (1948)
• ILO’s Declaration of Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (1998)
11
Are reconfirmed in various international agreements:• UN Covenants
• ILO Conventions
• European Union Charter
• OECD Guidelines
• Regional human rights conventions
Glo
bal
Co
nte
xt Basic worker rights
Drafted and agreed by the international community over decades
(e.g. European Convention on Human Rights – Turkey is a member)
12
ILO - The UN agency devoted to the world of work
The fundamentals:
• ILO Conventions are the primary international agreements codifying labor standards
• ILO Conventions are treaties
• Conventions focus on government responsibility.
Glo
bal
Co
nte
xt International Labor Organization
In this context, the government of Turkey bears an international responsibility to ensure that workers rights are respected within its national boundaries.
13
Glo
bal
Co
nte
xt
This model of government enforcement of worker rights has been challenged in recent decades
GlobalizationGlobalization
Challenges
14
• Transportation and communication costs are cheaper
• Trade barriers (tariffs, quotas) are on the decline
Glo
bal
Co
nte
xt Globalization
In today’s global economy, more goods and capital are moving across national boundaries than ever before
15
• Toys, apparel, and footwear are made in workplaces around the world
• Abundance of workers in many parts of the world
• Often companies can opt to change where they produce in order to lower production costs
Glo
bal
Co
nte
xt In today’s global economy
Workers, management, and governments are in competition to keep jobs and production from moving away.
16
• There are incentives to compete based on lower labor costs
• Government regulation is more complicated with supply chains reaching across national boundaries
• Nonetheless, the importance of government enforcement is no less real in today’s global economy
Glo
bal
Co
nte
xt In today’s global economy
There is a call for international structures to bolster governments in upholding international labor standards
17
Include:
• Building international organizations that take a standardized approach to enforcing worker rights
Glo
bal
Co
nte
xt Responses to challenges
• Using market forces, such as consumer demands for “sweatshop free” clothes, to ensure that goods are produced in fair conditions
Each of the 6 organizations participating in Jo-In seek to take one or both of these approaches to support the enforcement of worker rights around the world
18
• Clean Clothes Campaign
• Ethical Trading Initiative
• Fair Labor Association
• Fair Wear Foundation
• Social Accountability International
• Workers Rights Consortium
Respond to challenges in global economy.
But DO NOT seek to replace government
Glo
bal
C
on
text
The 6 organizations in Jo-In
Responses to challenges
19
What are various stakeholders* doing to respond to the international call for fair working conditions in today’s global economy?
Glo
bal
Co
nte
xt Group Discussion
• Workers
• Governments
• Factories
• Major retailers, brands, etc
• Trade Unions
• NGOs (non-governmental organizations)
E.g.: Consumers – learn about poor workplace conditions internationally from the news media. They seek goods that are not made in sweatshops.
* Stakeholder = any individual or group affected by a particular entity/activity
Responses to challenges
20
Key terms
A brief review of some of the more specialized terms used in discussions about Code
implementation.
Stakeholder – Interested Party: Any individual or group that is affected by an entity or activity, in this case, the operations of an enterprise.
For example:
Term used in
this training
Term used in
this training
Alternative
terms follow
All definitions are in
the training
workbook
Ter
ms
21
Key terms – Actors
Workers are key stakeholders in discussions about
workplace conditions.
Who are some other important stakeholders?
Ter
ms
Stakeholder – Interested Party: Any individual or group that is affected by an entity or activity, in this case, the operations of an enterprise.
22
Key terms – Actors
Example: Most of the six organizations in Jo-In are MSIs.
MSI – Multi-stakeholder Initiative: A project or organization that brings together various stakeholders (e.g. companies, trade unions, and/or NGOs) to address specific issues (e.g. effective implementation of Codes of Conduct).
Ter
ms
23
Key terms – Actors
For example:• In this project, Gap Inc. is referred to as a brand, a sourcing company to Factory X.
Brand – sourcing company – buyer – retailer: Companies that buy goods through contracts with manufacturers.
A brand (a sourcing company or retailer) may own one or more “brand names” (a word or name used by a company to identify its goods).
For example: • Gap Inc. is associated with several brand names – Gap, Old Navy, Banana Republic. • Marks & Spencer is a retailer associated with brand names, such as Blue Harbour or
Autograph.
Ter
ms
24
Key terms – Actors
Facility – manufacturer – supplier – vendor – contractor: In this project, the term “facility” is used for any company that produces apparel through a contract with a sourcing company.
Example: There are approximately 6 facilities participating in this
pilot project.
Note: The term “workplace” is often used interchangeably with “facility.” In this project, however, “workplace” has a broader meaning, covering home-based and other subcontracted work.
Ter
ms
25
Key terms – Actors
Subcontractor: A company hired by the manufacturer/facility to carry out part of production.
In the context of this project, subcontractors can be identified if they do not have a contract with the brand.
Ter
ms
26
Key terms – Actors
Licensee: A company that is licensed to produce goods bearing another company’s (or university’s) brand name or logo through a contract with that company/university.
Example: Zephyr GrafX is licensed to produce goods that bear Columbia University’s name & logo.
Ter
ms
27
Key terms – Actors
NGO – non-governmental organization:
Organizations that are not part of the government nor companies (for-profit organizations).
Used in this context for local or international organizations that are not trade unions but promote workers’ rights in some way.
Ter
ms
28
Key terms – Activities
Social auditing – monitoring – verification: Activities undertaken to assess workplace conditions of a given facility.
These terms may also be used to describe a broader set of activities undertaken to assess a company’s (usually a brand’s) adherence to defined social standards in its supply chain.
Ter
ms
29
Key terms - Activities
Remediation – corrective action: Action taken to correct non-compliance with a labor standard.
A corrective action plan is the program of action drawn up to resolve the code violation.
Remediation strategies are a main focus of the Turkey project and will be addressed later in the seminar.
Ter
ms
30
Key terms
Complaint – appeal – charges that the Code standards of a given organization are not being respected.
A complaints mechanism is the system through which a complaint is received and processed.
Each of the six organizations has its own system for complaints and appeals, which will be reviewed in the second module.
See workbook for other terms and definitions
Ter
ms
31
“Th
e 6”
32
Design the ideal, imaginary organization working to improve workplace conditions internationally. Imagine together:
“Th
e 6”
Small group activity
The organization’s approach -- rate the importance of the following activities (1-4) Building the capacity of local actors in the countries where the
organization works Experimental projects that establish best practice for Code
implementation Auditing workplace conditions and company practices Reporting on factory/brand performance
The countries where it focuses its work and where it is based
Who it is composed of (i.e. stakeholder groups)
Identify challenges you imagine encountering in trying to establish this organization (e.g. balancing different interests, prioritizing work, funding, etc.)
Name the organization
You have 20 minutes. Be prepared to report the reasons for your choices.
33
Who are “the 6”?
• General approach
• Members and governance
• Codes
• Approaches to social auditing
• Disclosure/reporting
In this section we review the 6 organizations’
We look at the many things they have in common and some of the key differences
“Th
e 6”
34
“The 6” members of Jo-In are:
Clean Clothes Campaign (CCC) - Netherlands
Ethical Trading Initiative (ETI) – England
Fair Labor Association (FLA) – USA
Fair Wear Foundation (FWF) - Netherlands
Social Accountability International (SAI) – USA
Workers Rights Consortium (WRC) – USA
“Th
e 6”
35
What the 6 have in common“T
he
6”
Their purpose is to raise standards worldwide, rather
than target any given country
They all work internationally to improve workplace conditions
36
What the 6 have in common
• Founded between 1991-2000 in response to changes in global economy
• All have a stated mission to improve workplace conditions around the world
• All have drafted and adopted Codes of Conduct to achieve this goal
• Want to cooperate in order to learn and become more effective in their work
“Th
e 6”
A birds-eye view
…and who’s involved in steering the organizations.
Main differences arise in approaches taken to implement Codes…
37
General approaches“T
he
6”
• CCC
• ETI
• FLA
• FWF
• SAI
• WRC
Raises public awareness about worker rights
through general appeals
Learning good practice through pilot projects
and forums
Verifying brand compliance with standards
Certifies facilities that implement SA8000;
supports brands compliance efforts
Investigates conditions in factories producing
university-licensed apparel
Over time, the organizations have increasingly taken on similar activities.
38
Those with brand members
Organization
Number of companies
Examples of member companies
Ethical Trading Initiative (ETI) 37
Gap, Marks & SpencerASDA, Chiquita, Levi & Strauss, Mothercare, Next, Pentland Group, Sainsbury’s, Tesco, Body Shop, Boots, WH Smith.
Fair Labor Association (FLA)
28 adidas, Nike, Patagonia, PumaEddie Bauer, H&M, Liz Claiborne, Nordstrom, PVH, Reebok
> 1000 licensees
Top of the World, Zephyr GrafX -- companies producing goods bearing the logo of FLA university members.
Fair Wear Foundation (FWF)
18
Hess NaturExpresso, Faithful, Falcon International, Gsus, JSI-O’Neill, Mervin Marxx, Pama International
Social Accountability International (SAI)
12 GapCutter & Buck, Dole, Eileen Fisher, Timberland, Toys R Us.
763 certified
factories
Yeşim and Topkapi are Turkey’s 2 certified apparel factories. See workbook for more.
Those without brand membersClean Clothes Campaign (CCC)
0 Has been engaged in pilot projects involving brands.
Workers Rights Consortium (WRC) 0
No brand membership. List of relevant university licensees (i.e. those producing for member universities) is provided online.
“Th
e 6”
Company membership
39
Organization
Members Decision-makers Income/Funding
Clean Clothes Campaign (CCC)
NGOs, trade unions
Each national CCC coalition has its own Board, which contributes to the direction of the international CCC through regular regional meetings.
Grants from governments, non-profits and foundations
Ethical Trading Initiative (ETI)
Companies, trade unions, NGOs
10-person Board: 3 NGOs; 3 trade unions; 3 companies; 1 chair.
Company membership fees; government grants
Fair Labor Association (FLA)
Companies, universities, NGOs
16-person Board: 6 companies; 6 NGOs; 3 universities; 1 chair.
Company membership fees; university membership fees; foundation grants
Fair Wear Foundation(FWF)
Companies, trade unions, NGOs
10-person Board: 4 business associations; 2 trade unions; 2 NGOs; 1 chair.
Company membership fees; trade union fees; grants from non-profits.
Social Accountability International(SAI)
Companies, trade unions, NGOs, government
7-person Board, advised by Advisory Board. Both have equal representation between business and non-business representatives.
Company membership fees; training; auditor accreditation fees; foundation grants
Workers Rights Consortium(WRC)
Universities, trade unions, NGOs
15-person Board: 5 universities; 5 NGOs; 5 labor rights experts.
University membership fees; foundation and government grants
Members & decision-making“T
he
6”
40
Members and decision-making
• All 6 have NGO membership
• FLA and WRC have university members
• Non-company members make up at least half of all 6 organizations’ Boards
• CCC and WRC have no company members
• FLA does not have trade union involvement in decision-making structures
“Th
e 6”
Highlights
41
Industry focus
Only apparel
• CCC
• FWF
• WRC
“Th
e 6”
The initiatives are distinguished by the industries where they work. While 3 specialize in apparel, 3 also work in other industries.
Apparel and other industries
• ETI
• FLA
• SAI
42
• Advisory boards and caucuses
• Training and capacity building
• Projects in different countries
• Informal and formal consultations
• Third party complaints mechanisms
Ways local stakeholders are involved“T
he
6”
At a glance
43
Have you been involved in any of these or other activities with any one of the 6? Which activity? How did the activity correspond to the organization’s mission and approach?
“The 6”Group discussion
“Th
e 6”
44
“The 6”The six organizations in Jo-In
Codes and Social Auditing
45
• CCC – Code of Labour Practices
• ETI – Base Code
• FLA – Workplace Code of Conduct
• FWF – Code of Labour Practices
• SAI – SA8000 Standard
• WRC – Model Code of Conduct
Codes of Conduct C
od
es 6 organizations – 6 codes
46
• Freedom of association
• Collective bargaining
• No forced labor
• No child labor
• No discrimination
• Occupational health and safety
• Hours of work
• Wage provisions (from “minimum” to “dignified living wage”)
Basic code provisionsC
od
es What they all cover
47
• A legal employment relationship (CCC, ETI, FWF)
• Women’s rights (WRC)
• Management systems (SAI)
• No inhumane treatment (ETI)*
• No harassment or abuse (FLA, SAI, WRC)*
Basic code provisionsC
od
es Additional provisions
*The codes that do not contain a separate provision covering
inhuman treatment or harassment and abuse fold these under
health and safety provisions.
48
• Wages
• Hours of work
• Freedom of association
Content of code provisionsC
od
es Main divergence
Partially explains why the Jo-In project focuses on
implementation of these 3 code provisions
49
• CCC, ETI, FWF, SAI codes have similar living wage texts
• WRC code - “dignified living wage” -- may differ from a “basic needs” wage
• FLA code - “minimum wage” or “prevailing industry wage” whichever is higher
Content of code provisionsC
od
es Wages
“Wages and benefits paid for a standard working week shall meet at least legal or industry
minimum standards and always be sufficient to meet basic needs of workers and their families
and to provide some discretionary income.” -- FWF Code of Labour
Practice
50
• CCC, ETI, FWF, SAI codes have similar text
• WRC code - overtime must be voluntary, but no maximum (e.g. 60 hours) for overtime
• FLA code - more than 60 hours allowed in peak periods; does not state overtime must be voluntary
Content of code provisionsC
od
es Hours of workHours of work shall comply with applicable laws and industry standards. In any event, workers
shall not on a regular basis be required to work in excess of 48 hours per week and shall be
provided with at least one day off for every 7 day period. Overtime shall be voluntary, shall not
exceed 12 hours per week, shall not be demanded on a regular basis and shall always be
compensated at a premium rate. -- CCC’s Code of Labour Practice
51
• All codes – right to form/join trade unions of their choice; bargain collectively
• ETI and CCC - “open” or “positive” attitude
• FLA, SAI, WRC – against company interference (“neutral” attitude)
• ETI, FWF, SAI – provision of parallel means where prohibited by law (China).
Content of code provisionsC
od
es Freedom of association2. Freedom of Association and the Right to Collective Bargaining Are Respected
2.1 Workers, without distinction, have the right to join or form trade unions of their own choosing and to bargain collectively.
2.2 The employer adopts an open attitude towards the activities of trade unions and their organisational activities.
2.3 Workers representatives are not discriminated against and have access to carry out their representative functions in the workplace. -- ETI Base Code
52
Considering ways in which the codes differ, what approach would you recommend taking in the development of a Common Code?
Would you opt to adopt one of the 6 codes? Would you adopt the highest standards across the codes? Would you start by trying to develop an entirely new code?
Content of code provisionsC
od
es Group discussion
We will review the contents of the Jo-In draft Code in Module 2
53
Social auditing – what’s it involve?S
oci
al a
ud
itin
g
“WRC investigations”
“SAI – SA8000 auditing”
“FWF external verification”
“FLA independent external monitoring”
54
What is the purpose of social auditing? What are some common observations about the ways that auditing is carried out today? What are your thoughts about how to make it effective?
Later in the seminar, compare whether your views correspond with approaches taken by these organizations.
Social auditing Group discussion
So
cial
au
dit
ing
55
Social auditing – monitoring – verification – investigations
Those who do it
So
cial
au
dit
ing
FLA “Independent external monitoring” in 3-5% of supply chains/year. Requires member companies to conduct internal audits of their entire supply chains by their 3rd year of membership.
FWF “External verification” in 10% of facilities/3 years. Member companies also supposed to conduct internal audits covering all supplier facilities by 3rd year (like FLA).
SAI “SA8000 audits” in facilities seeking SA8000 certification. Member companies may also conduct SA8000 audits in selected sourcing facilities.
WRC “Investigations” of factories producing university-licensed goods. Unlike others, WRC investigations are initiated without any company approval. The onsite approach also differs significantly.
Those who don’tCCC
ETI
Neither conducts social auditing of supply chains.
But both have undertaken research and pilot projects to ascertain good practice in social auditing.
56
• Preparation• Background information collected (e.g. number of workers,
languages spoken, etc.)• Consultations with trade unions (local & national, NGOs,
labor experts)
• Interviews• Workers • Factory managers• Trade union and/or worker representatives• Supervisors
• Onsite audit • Records review (personnel records, hours, wages)• Facility inspection (health and safety, hygiene, etc.)
What it entailsA general overview
An audit typically takes 2-6 days, depending on factory size and
which of the 3 organizations’ audit methodologies is used.
So
cial
au
dit
ing Note: This process is more
representative of FLA, FWF, and SAI than WRC, which takes a slightly different approach.
57
What it entailsHow methods differ
So
cial
au
dit
ing
• WRC in-depth, off-site interviews with workers and local experts.
• WRC spans weeks or months
• FLA, WRC always unannounced visits
• FWF, WRC worker interviews conducted off-site SAI and FLA recommend it whenever possible
• SA8000 certification involves several audits pre-audit visits; certification audit; later surveillance
SAI recommends it for surveillance audits
58
Who conducts the work?S
oci
al a
ud
itin
g
• FLA monitors = 16 groups accredited by FLA for specified countries.
• FWF verification teams = 3 people teams selected and trained by FWF for work in a single country.
• SA8000 certification bodies = 13 groups trained and accredited by SAI, mostly to work globally.
• WRC investigative teams = members of local labor groups, academics, WRC staff member.
59
What follows Remediation - corrective action
Ou
tco
mes
• FLA and FWF – corrective action plan established by factory and brand, with MSI staff guidance.
• SAI – facility designs and implements corrective action plan after approval by SA8000 auditor.
• WRC – recommends remedial action. Investigation continues until violation resolved.
Evidence of corrective action is required by all to be able to move forward.
60
What follows Remediation - corrective action
Ou
tco
mes
Root cause analysis:
For example:
Inadequate planning
Short lead times Forced overtime
61
What follows Follow-up visits
Ou
tco
mes
• FLA conducts follow-up visits where serious violations occurred.
• FWF conducts follow-up visits to all facilities to verify corrective actions.
• If a factory is certified, SAI conducts surveillance audits every 6-12 months for 3 years.
• WRC investigation is ongoing until the case is resolved.
62
Who sees factory findings & remediation?Accessing the results
Ou
tco
mes
Factory MSI Brand Trade
union in factory
Workers in
factory
Local Partners
Public - Website
FLA Detailed report posted in 6 months
FWF After first round of improve-ments.
General report only.
SAI May access, if needed.
Only if brand is authorized.
Usually may access.
WRC
63
Social auditing, etc.Partner work
Ou
tco
mes
Based on the approaches taken by “the 6,” work with the person next to you to develop a program for social auditing (or monitoring/verification/investigation)
• What is the purpose of your social auditing program? E.g. verifying brand compliance programs, factory certification, etc.
• Which issues and activities do you focus on during the process (e.g. health & safety; interviews)?
• What individuals/groups do you select to conduct the audits? Using what criteria?
• How do you approach remediation? How do you confirm that remediation has been undertaken?
• What is your policy on reporting outcomes of auditing and remediation?
64
Public Reporting and disclosureWhat’s disclosed and to whom?
Ou
tco
mes
Factory names disclosed
Factory conditions disclosed
Brand performance disclosed
CCC Where workers have given permission, factory names are provided.
All information accessible to public, especially workers and their representatives.
May publicly assess brands based on their supply chain performance.
ETI N/A Companies send summarized reports on conditions in their supply chains to ETI secretariat.
Company reports shared internally among ETI members. Through confidential process, members are rated and share “good practice”.
FLA FLA monitoring reports do not use factory names.
University licensees’ factory names accessed on web.
Factory conditions in independently monitored facilities are publicly disclosed on FLA website, listing only the relevant brands.
Online annual report details brand activities to improve workplace conditions. Brands are publicly evaluated when they are “accredited” after 3 years.
FWF Are only shared with workers and workplace trade union representatives.
Brief summaries of findings from FWF verification visits are covered in FWF’s annual report.
Annual report (available online) briefly reviews member brands’ compliance activities.
SAI All certified factories and their addresses accessed on SAI website.
Audit reports can be accessed by SAI staff.
Brands’ programs evaluated internally. Brands opt to publicly report summary of this evaluation or percentage of supply chain SA8000-certified.
WRC
All reports contain factory names. All factories that fall within WRC scope accessible on website database.
All findings are made public and shared with workers and their representatives.
N/A
65
Public Reporting and disclosureWhat’s disclosed and to whom?
Ou
tco
mes
Key points
• CCC and WRC – full public disclosure of all findings. CCC discloses factory names only upon workers’ request.
• FLA – detailed public reporting on monitored factories & brands’ programs.
• FWF – publishes summaries of brands’ performance.
• SAI – discloses names and addresses of certified facilities. Internal evaluation of brands’ performance.
• ETI – internal evaluation of brands’ performance. Most are still exploring best methods for effective public reporting.
66
Today we discussed:• The global context
• Specialized terminology used in this field
• The 6 organizations • General approach • Membership• Codes • Approaches to social auditing• Disclosure/reporting
Co
ncl
usi
on
67
Return to your small groups and together reflect on what was covered in Module 1. Identify which of the 6 organizations is most similar to your imaginary organization. What were the similarities? What were the differences?
Identify ways in which your imaginary organizations would benefit from cooperation with any or all of the 6. List the kind of activities your organization would like to include in a joint project with the other organization(s). Where would you propose to host the project?
Small group activityC
on
clu
sio
n
Comparison with imagined organizations
Hold onto notes from this discussion for use in Module 2.
68
Module 2 will deal with 1) how the Jo-In project works, and 2) how complaints mechanisms work.
To prepare for Module 2, review what you’ve learned today and consider how you would design the Jo-In project to achieve its two main goals:
• To enhance cooperation among the 6 organizations
• To learn from each other in order to be more effective in improving workplace conditions around the world.
Independent workC
on
clu
sio
n
Designing the Jo-In project
Keep in mind the similarities and differences that exist among the 6.
69
www.
Thank you!
See you again at the 2nd module of this seminar
.jo-in.org