View
218
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
MANAGING RISK OF NUCLEAR MANAGING RISK OF NUCLEAR KNOWLEDGE LOSSKNOWLEDGE LOSSMANAGING RISK OF NUCLEAR MANAGING RISK OF NUCLEAR KNOWLEDGE LOSSKNOWLEDGE LOSS
L. PIRONKOV
TRAINING CENTER, KOZLODUY NPP
L. PIRONKOV
TRAINING CENTER, KOZLODUY NPP
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да CONTENT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
2
1. IAEA COORDINATED RESEARCH PROJECT
2. NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
• THE SCOPE AND SPECIFIC RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
• PERFORMED ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS ACHIEVED – YEAR 2008
3. IAEA NATIONAL TECHNICAL CO-OPERATION PROJECT
• MAIN OBJECTIVES AND PLANNED ACTIVITIES
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да IAEA COORDINATED RESEARCH PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
3
COORDINATED RESEARCH PROJECT
• COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF METHODS AND TOOLS
FOR NUCLEAR KNOWLEDGE PRESERVATION
MAIN OBJECTIVE
• TO SUPPORT THE PRESERVATION OF NUCLEAR
KNOWLEDGE IN MEMBER STATES AND THE IAEA BY
SELECTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF APPROPRIATE
COST-EFFECTIVE TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS
COUNTRIES INVOLVED
• BULGARIA, CANADA, EU, GERMANY, JORDAN,
PHILIPPINES, PAKISTAN, ROMANIA, RUSSIA
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
4
NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
• ANALYSIS OF METHODS AND TOOLS FOR NUCLEAR
KNOWLEDGE PRESERVATION IN BULGARIA
INSTITUTES INVOLVED
• TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOFIA, COLLEGE OF
ENERGY AND ELECTRONICS, KOZLODUY NPP
PLANNED DURATION
• THREE YEARS ( SUBSEQUENTLY REDUCED TO TWO
YEARS)
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
5
OVERALL OBJECTIVES
• TO DETERMINE THE SCALE OF THE KNOWLEDGE
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AT KOZLODUY NUCLEAR
POWER PLANT (KNPP)
• TO EVALUATE THE FEASIBILITY OF
IMPLEMENTATION OF QUANTITIVE RISK ANALYSIS
OF NUCLEAR KNOWLEDGE LOSS
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
6
THE SCOPE AND SPECIFIC RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
– PERFORMING A FORMAL RISK ANALYSIS OF
POTENTIAL KNOWLEDGE LOSS FOR SAFETY
CRITICAL POSITIONS/INDIVIDUALS
– PERFORMING A KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION
STUDY, BASED UPON RISK ANALYSIS OF
KNOWLEDGE LOSS AND APPLYING THE CONCEPT
MAP APPROACH
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
7
MAIN TASKS
•TASK 1: THE IDENTIFICATION OF KEY PLANT POSITIONS AND
OVERVIEW OF RELATED TO THEM KNOWLEDGE BASE
–THE RISK ANALYSIS OF KEY PLANT POSITIONS AND RESPECTIVE
PERSONS HAS BEEN CARRIED OUT. THE AVAILABLE KNOWLEDGE
INFORMATION HAS BEEN ANALYZED AND THE VALUABLE DATA HAS
BEEN DEFINED.
•TASK 2: THE IDENTIFICATION OF “CRITICAL” INDIVIDUALS
–THE STAFF OF TWO KEY POSITIONS HAS BEEN EXAMINED AND
POTENTIAL CONSEQUENCES CAUSED BY THE LOSS OF THAT
EXPERTS HAS BEEN ANALYZED. THE DIFFERENT OPTIONS FOR
PRESERVATION OF SUCH “TACIT” KNOWLEDGE HAS BEEN
CONSIDERED AND EVALUATED
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
8
MAIN TASKS
• TASK 3: KNOWLEDGE MAPPING
– STRUCTURED AND PERSONALIZED EXIT-INTERVIEWS HAS BEEN
DEVELOPED FOR NOMINATED INDIVIDUALS. THE INTERVIEWS HAS
BEEN CONDUCTED AND CRITICAL KNOWLEDGE HAS BEEN
ELICITED THROUGH SET OF CONCEPT MAPS
• TASK 4: USE OF CAPTURED INFORMATION
– THE CAPTURED INFORMATION COULD BE USE DIRECTLY FOR
TRAINING OF THE “SUCCESSORS”. RESPECTIVE
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NEXT PROCESSING AND USE OF
INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
9
PERFORMED ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS ACHIEVED
– TASK 1
• THE RISK ANALYSIS STUDY HAS BEEN PERFORMED ON THE BASE
OF THE GENERAL APPROACH DESCRIBED IN “RISK MANAGEMENT
OF KNOWLEDGE LOSS IN NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ORGANIZATIONS,
IAEA, VIENNA, 2006”; HOWEVER THE METHODOLOGY HAS BEEN
ADAPTED TO REFLECT PLANT SPECIFICS
• DEFINITION OF TARGET GROUPS – ACCORDING TO LICENSE
REQUIREMENTS CLASSIFICATION:
– JOB POSITIONS RESPONSIBLE FOR NUCLEAR SAFETY AND RADIATION
PROTECTION
– JOBPOSITIONS RELATED TO NUCLEAR SFAETY AND RADIATION
PROTECTION
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
10
PERFORMED ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS ACHIEVED
– TASK 1
• SELECTED TARGET GROUP – JOB POSITIONS
RESPONSIBLE TO NUCLEAR SAFETY AND RADIATION
PROTECTION
• THIS GROUP INCLUDES 17 JOB POSITIONS OF
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION PERSONNEL
• THE SCOPE OF THE STUDY CONTAINS A FORMAL RISK
ANALYSIS OF 79 INDIVIDUALS.
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
11
PERFORMED ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS ACHIEVED
– TASK 1
• THE TOTAL RISK FACTOR HAS BEEN DEFINED AS A
COMBINATION OF THREE TYPES OF THREATS –
ATTRITION, POSITION AND PERSONAL. THE SPECIFIC
WEIGHTING RATE HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO EACH
THREAT. THE VALUE OF TOTAL RISK FACTOR HAS
BEEN NORMALIZED.
• THE ATTRITION THREAT IS MADE OF TWO
COMPONENTS: PLANNED AND PREDICTIVE ATTRITION
DATE
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
12
ATTRITION THREAT RISK FACTOR
PLANNED ATTRITION (RETIREMENT, LIMITED TENURE, ETC.) PLANNED FACTOR
PREDICTIVE FACTOR
WEIGHT RATE
CRITERIA
10 - 9 0 0.4 Planned attrition date within current calendar year, take account of personal specifics
8 – 7 0 0.4 Planned attrition date within next calendar year, take account of personal specifics
6 – 5 0 0.4 Planned attrition date within third calendar year, take account of personal specifics
4 – 3 0 0.4 Planned attrition date within forth calendar year, take account of personal specifics
2 - 1 0 0.4 Planned attrition date within (or later than) fifth calendar year, take account of personal specifics
PREDICTIVE ATTRITION (DEPENDING ON AVERAGE TENURE OF THE POSITION) 0 9 - 8 0.4 The difference between current and average tenure within
one year, take account of personal specifics 0 7 - 6 0.4 The difference between current and average tenure within
two years, take account of personal specifics 0 5 – 4 0.4 The difference between current and average tenure within
three years, take account of personal specifics 0 3 - 2 0.4 The difference between current and average tenure within
four years, take account of personal specifics 0 1 0.4 The difference between current and average tenure within
five years, take account of personal specifics
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
13
PERFORMED ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS ACHIEVED
– TASK 1
• THE POSITION THREAT INCLUDES TWO COMPONENTS – JOB
EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS AND EDUCATION DEGREE
REQUIREMENTS.
• THE PERSONAL THREAT IS A CONDITIONAL ASSESSMENT OF
COMPLEX PERSONAL RATING. THAT RATING HAS BEEN
ASSIGNED BY RESEARCH EXPERT AND SHOULD CONSIDER
PROFESSIONAL FILE OF THE EMPLOYEE (INCLUDING
INFORMAL ROLES AND SOFT SKILLS), EVALUATION OF
DIRECT MANAGER, OPINION OF COLLEAGUES AND KEY
PARTNERS
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
14
POSITION THREAT RISK FACTOR
COMPONENT RISK FACTOR
WEIGHT RATE
CRITERIA
8 0.5 At least 15 years total job experience, minimum 10 of them on specific position in KNPP
7 0.5 At least 10 years total job experience, minimum 10 of them on specific position in KNPP
6 0.5 At least 10 years total job experience, minimum 5 of them on specific position in KNPP
5 0.5 At least 8 years total job experience, minimum 8 of them on specific position in KNPP
4 0.5 At least 7 years total job experience, 3 to 7 of them on specific position in KNPP
3 0.5 At least 5 years total job experience, 3 to 5 of them on specific position in KNPP
Job experience
2 0.5 Less than 5 years total job experience, at least 2 of them on specific position in KNPP.
2 0.5 University degree on specific engineering specialty 1 0.5 Technical university degree
Education degree
0 0.5 General technical education
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
15
PERSONAL THREAT RISK FACTOR
RISK FACTOR
WEIGHT RATE
CRITERIA
10 – 9 0.1 Prominent expert with unique knowledge and skills related to plant safety and reliability. Commonly accepted authority. Undocumented knowledge. No ready replacements available.
8 – 7 0.1 Mission critical knowledge and skills. Possess technology and site specific knowledge. Applicable soft skills. Some documentation exists. Limited number of potential successors.
6 – 5 0.1 Important and comprehensive technology and organization knowledge and skills (including soft skills). Documentation exists. Sufficient number of on-site personnel possesses similar characteristics.
4 – 3 0.1 Systematized job position related knowledge and skills. Training programs and training courses exist. In site recruits are available.
2 - 0 0.1 Standard technical knowledge and skills. Recruits are generally available.
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
16
The total risk factor is a sum of components enumerated by modified exponential distribution function. Such approach allows the tuning of the results depending of λ parameter value.
TOTAL RISK FACTOR
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
17
PERFORMED ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS ACHIEVED
– TASK 2
• THE TOTAL RISK FACTOR OF THESE EXPERTS IS
POSITIONED ON THE “ORANGE” AREA OF THE RISK
CHART
• THE ELABORATE QUESTIONNAIRE OF 60 QUESTIONS
HAS BEEN DEVELOPED
• A KNOWLEDGE RETENTION PILOT STUDY HAS BEEN
CARRIED OUT.
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
18
PERFORMED ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS ACHIEVED
– TASK 3
• CONCEPT MAPS WERE USED TO CAPTURE,
REPRESENT, AND PRESERVE INSTITUTIONAL MEMORY
OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED EXPERTS. THE WORK
WITH THE EXPERTS TOOK FOUR WEEKS.
• IN THIS PILOT STUDY THE TWO-PERSON TEAM WAS
DESIGNED WITH ONE MEMBER DESIGNATED AS A
MODERATOR AND THE SECOND MEMBER AS A
RECORDER.
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
19
PERFORMED ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS ACHIEVED
– TASK 3
• A BRIEFING REGARDING THE GOALS OF THE WORK,
ACCOMPANIED BY A REVIEW OF THE PRELIMINARY
CONCEPT MAPS HAS BEEN CONDUCTED
• THE MODERATOR INTERACTS WITH THE EXPERTS;THE
RECORDER ACTUALLY CREATED THE CONCEPT MAP
AS THE DISCUSSION UNFOLDS. WHEN NECESSARY HE
CREATED SUBMAPS (IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE
STUDY – FOUR SUB MAPS).
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
20
PERFORMED ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS ACHIEVED
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
21
PERFORMED ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS ACHIEVED
– TASK 4
• DEVELOPMENT OF NEW TRAINING COURSES OR
UPDATING THE EXISTING MATERIALS.
– THE COURSE “NEUTRON AND REACTOR PHYSICS
PROCESSES” HAS BEEN UPDATED AND EXPANDED
– THE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR TWO NEW COURSES
– “TRAINING OF OPERATING PERSONNEL ON SBEOP FOR
VVER-440” AND “TRAINING OF OPERATING PERSONNEL ON
SBEOP FOR VVER-1000” HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED AND
APPROVED BY REGULATORY BODY.
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
22
PERFORMED ACTIVITIES
– TASK 4
• OTHER AREAS OF APPLICATION OF THE PROJECT
RESULTS ARE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF KNOWLEDGE
RETENTION PLANS AND SUCCESSION PLANNING.
• THREE DIFFERENT TEMPLATES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF
KNOWLEDGE RETENTION PLAN HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED
TO PLANT MANAGEMENT FOR ASSESSMENT,
SELECTION AND APPROVAL FOR FUTURE
IMPLEMENTATION
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да IAEA NATIONAL TECHNICAL CO-OPERATION PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
23
PROJECT TITLE
– BUL0009 MANAGING WORKFORCE FLOW AND RISK OF
NUCLEAR KNOWLEDGE LOSS.
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
– TO AVOID LOSS OF SPECIFIC NUCLEAR KNOWLEDGE AND
EXPERTISE ACCUMULATED AFTER YEARS
– TO FACILITATE SMOOTH REDISTRIBUTION OF NUCLEAR
WORKFORCE FLOW IN SPECIFIC COUNTRY CONDITIONS -
DECOMMISSIONING, OPERATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF
NUCLEAR POWER UNITS
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да IAEA NATIONAL TECHNICAL CO-OPERATION PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
24
PLANNED ACTIVITIES
– IDENTIFICATION OF AVAILABLE INTERNATIONAL
EXPERIENCE AND GOOD PRACTICES AND
EVALUATION OF THEIR APPLICABILITY TO KNPP
– IMPROVEMENT OF THE APPLIED RISK ANALYSIS
METHODOLOGY AND IMPLEMENTATION TO OTHER
TARGET GROUPS OF PERSONNEL
2008 – 2008 – година на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуйгодина на върхови постижения за АЕЦ Козлодуй
35
35 го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да
го
ди
ни
ен
ер
ги
я з
а ч
ист
а п
ри
ро
да IAEA NATIONAL TECHNICAL CO-OPERATION PROJECT
BU
LATO
M C
ON
FER
ENC
E 20
09, 2
7-29
May
, Riv
iera
Com
plex
25
PLANNED ACTIVITIES
– BROAD IMPLEMENTATION OF TESTED ON PILOT STUDY
CONCEPT MAP TECHNIQUE. CUSTOMIZATION OF CONCEPT
MAPS OF ALL PERSONS SITUATED IN “RED” SECTOR OF
“TOTAL RISK CHART”
– APPROVAL OF STANDARD MODEL OF KNOWLEDGE
RETENTION PLAN. DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFIC
KNOWLEDGE RETENTION PLAN FOR MOST CRITICAL
POSITIONS, IDENTIFIED THROUGH ANALYSIS OF RISK OF
NUCLEAR KNOWLEDGE LOSS