Upload
helena-holland
View
238
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
NaI calibrationNaI calibration and neutron observationneutron observation during the charge exchange experiment
1. Improving the NaI energy resolution (as low as reasonably achievable!)• Common noise reduction • Intercalibration• Clustering algorithm
2. Observation of the prompt signal of “high energy” neutrons (8.9 MeV)• A “matter-of-fact” evidence, in Xe and in NaI• Comparison with cross sections• First look at and requirements of a MC for neutrons in LXe.
Giovanni Signorelli, INFN Pisa MEG collaboration meeting, PSI 9 Feb 2004
2
1. Common noise reduction
2. Crystal intercalibration
3. Clustering for energy summation
NaI calibration procedure
23% 11% FWHM @ 55 MeV
3
Common noise reduction
Algorithm:Simplif. From E.Frlez, D. Pocanic, S.Ritt NIM A463 (2001)
1. Take the ADC of the channels which see pedestal
2. Make the average
3. Subtract it from all channels (second pedestal correction)
The pedestal ’s shrink from 56 to 23.It’s not perfect but compatible with the ALARA principle
Correlation between channels due to electronics, noise in cables, ADCs…
4
Crystal intercalibration
ROUGH CALIBRATION
•Cosmic ray runs can be used to inter-calibrate crystals
•Muons triggered by crystal pairs
•Position of the Landau peak
FINE TUNING
•Problems for crystals at the center (the crystal are not uniformly spanned by cosmics?)
•Refined with monoenergetic gammas
5
Energy clustering
The cluster C includes the element of the detector with the maximum energy plus all the fired elements connected to another member of the cluster by a side or a corner
E = EiiC
6
Results
•The resolution is acceptable
•The peak position is well reproduced
54.8 MeV 83 MeV 129.8 MeV
5.5% 5.1% 4.9%
Reconstructed peak
7
A better NaI helps
•A cleaner separation of the two NaI peaks helps in reducing the tails on the Lxe distributions
•An improved collinearity requirement shows the real performance
8
Neutron observation during the experiment
•Evidence for a prompt signal from neutrons
•8.9 MeV neutron in coincidence with the 129 MeV gamma
•Neutrons from the Am/Be source (10 MeV)
•Comparison with cross sections (physics)
•Inelastic scattering
•Xe level excitation
•First look at and requirements of a MC for neutrons in LXe.
•Geant 3.21 + GCALOR
•Geant 4
•Possible use of neutrons for calibration/monitoring purposes (Angela)
•Availability – switchability
•Probe of the entire detector
9
Evidence
•Runs triggered with one of the detectors only (&S1 &RF…)
•Emeasured> 110 MeV selection of the - p n events
•No timing cut (implies an energy/position cut!)
XeXe NaINaI
50% efficiency
10
Neutron-induced prompt signal in Xe
For fast neutrons (110 MeV) the total and scattering cross sections are similar for all isotopes
= 1 barn = 72 cm in LXe
11
Neutron cross section
12
Processes
A COMPLETE MONTECARLO CALCULATION IS NEEDED FOR COMPUTING THE NEUTRON EFFECTS IN THE CALORIMETER :• efficiency for fast and thermal neutron detection• determination of the energy spectrum in the calorimeter• energy released as a function of time• energy density (x,y,z)• dependence on threshold and n-energy
ALL THE RELEVANT NEUTRON CROSS-SECTIONS CAN BE INCLUDED IN GEANT 3.21 AND ARE INCLUDED IN GEANT4
information from medical physics…….!KERMA COEFF. (Kinetic Energy Released per unit Mass) and
tr / (mass energy transfer coefficient)tabulated for neutrons
13
MC for neutrons in liquid Xenon
Though the most reliable simulation today is GEANT4, some quick results were obtained with GEANT 3.21 + GCALOR
•8.9 MeV neutron simulated impinging a 10 x 10 cm2 window of the Lproto (time cut-off at 600ns) coming from the LH2 target
•GCALOR (MICAP, En < 20 MeV) takes care of n cross sections (ENDF VI B)
•N,n n,2n …
•If the residual nucleus is left in an excited state the deexcitation photon is generated (this is not done in the n,Xe n’Xe case. Bug? We generated these photons by hand)
•Some refinement still possible
•In GEANT4 the code for the neutron transportation is automatically embedded in the package and is “benchmarked” with a comparison to real data!
14
Neutron Monte Carlo event sample
Incoming neutron
•8.9 MeV neutron
•10 x 10 cm2 window
•Coincidence with the 129 MeV photon
15
MC spectrum
2.2 MeV capture on protons
Xe levels
•A neutron edge is present
•Low energy lines due to Xe and/or other nuclear levels
•High energy tails: n capture and isotope production
•The comparison with the data is good but not excellent
16
Conclusion
• A calibration procedure for the NaI has been estabilished and coded in the (Pisa version of the) analyzer, obtaining a fairly good E resolution for this detector
• The neutron prompt signal was identified in Xe and NaI and the understanding of the process is under way. We’ll do our best to reproduce the experimental result…
• A new window is open, a new handle is present. To us the difficult task to exploit it (calibration, monitoring…)!
17
…timing
18
neutron
gamma
n2n
n 1 n 2
n
19
Xe 129
TOT SC
20
Xe 129
n2n n3n
Initial energy degradation and neutron duplication
21
Xe 129 nuclear level excitations n1 n2 etc.Levels 0.039 0.236 0.318 MeV
energy degradation and kinetic energy into energy
22
Xe 129 n
23
Xe 132nuclear level excitations n1 n2 etc.
Levels 0.628 0.1.298 01.44 MeV
24
Xe 132 n