62
1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World Class Programs March, 2004 It’s All About Program Improvement

1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

1

Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data

Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works

Michigan Administrative Leadership InstituteBuilding World Class Programs

March, 2004

It’s All About Program Improvement

Page 2: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

2

It is all aboutIt is all about

Program Improvement

Improving the Quality of our Services

and the

Success of our Students

Page 3: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

3

Program ImprovementThree Starting Points

• Assessing Current Capabilities

• Programs

• Staff

• Using Data to pinpoint program improvement targets

• Integrating Research

Page 4: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

4

TODAY

Using Data

to pinpoint

program improvement targets

Page 5: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

5

Warming Up to Data

When I talk about data and graphs,

I feel like (a) _______________________

because _________________________.

Page 6: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

6

Warming Up to Data

When I talk about data and graphs,

“I feel like Marcia Clark because I’ve got all kinds of data and the jury (my teachers) just won’t believe it.”

“I feel like I’m in the wrong room because I noticed the accountants meeting next door.”

Page 7: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

7

Part I Training Objectives

– Developing critical success factors for key program components,

– Identifying types and sources of available data for those components,

– Determining appropriate indicators for flagging potential problems/red flags,

– Generating appropriate questions to identify possible causes of red flags, and

– Developing a structure to apply what you learned.

By the end of today’s workshop, you will be able to use a data analysis process to promote continuous improvement by:

Page 8: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

8

OVERVIEW

Part I: Types of data you have at hand:

• Performance data

• Local census data

• Enrollment and attendance data

• (Handout # 1AHandout # 1A)

Page 9: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

9

OVERVIEW

• Part II: Using data for decision making

1. What are the Key Program ComponentsKey Program Components of my program?

2. How do I know we are successfulsuccessful with each?

3. What datadata do I have to determine if we are successful?

Page 10: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

10

OVERVIEW

• Part II: Using data for decision making

4. Finding the Red FlagsRed Flags (What is not “good enough?”)

5. Isolating the problemIsolating the problem

6. Finding and Pilot TestingPilot Testing possible alternatives

7. IntegratingIntegrating the new alternative throughout my program (Going to Scale)

Page 11: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

11

OVERVIEW

Part III: Making it Work

• StructureStructure: Creating a structure and process to do the 7 items above

• Resources:Resources: Setting aside a few resources to perform the 7 items above.

Page 12: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

12

Data: A Carrot or a Stick?

Data can be used…

• To highlight, clarify, and explain what’s happening in your program,

OR

• To show what’s not happening in your program

Page 13: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

13

Using Data to Your Advantage

(i.e., as a carrot)

is up to you.

Page 14: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

14

Data Tells You…

• What has happened,

• What is happening now,

• Where do we need to focus our program improvement energy?

Page 15: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

15

What kinds of data do you have?

• Attendance/Enrollment Numbers

• Student Test Scores and Learning Gains

• Student Drop-out/Completion Rates

• Teacher Characteristics

• Student Demographics

• Budgets

• Census Data

• Other

Page 16: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

16

What can the data tell me?

• Are students coming? (enrollment)

• Are they staying? (retention)

• Are they learning? (educational gains)

• Are they meeting their goals? (student transitions)

• Other?

Page 17: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

17

Functions of Data• Accountability

• Help us identify whether goals are being met

• Program Management and Improvement

• Help us isolate problems

• Help us replace hunches and hypotheses (gut and guru) with facts concerning the changes that are needed

• Marketing

• Tell our funders, our boards, and our communities about the value of our programs and the return on their investments

Page 18: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

18

Quote of the Day

“People without information

cannot act.

People with information cannot

help but act.”

(Ken Blanchard)

Page 19: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

19

Activity 1: Warming Up to Data

• Data show that young adults in your program are dropping out at a significantly higher rate than older adults.

45%

20%

10%15%

7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Age Categories

Percent of Students Exiting Before Meeting Goal

16 - 18

19 - 24

25 - 44

45 - 59

60 +

Page 20: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

20

Activity 1: Warming Up to Data

– What data would have told you this?

– What drop-out rate would you consider to be a problem (i.e., 5%, 20%)?

– Are there additional data you would want to look at to explore this issue?

– What questions would you ask?

Page 21: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

21

Program ImprovementThree Starting Points

• Assessing Current Capabilities

• Programs

• Staff

• Using Data to pinpoint program improvement targets

• Integrating Research

3

Page 22: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

22

Self Assessment

1. Administer a program self assessment.

2. Engage the workgroup to review the self assessment, clarify and prioritize needs.

3. Set the vision for your program improvement initiative.

4. Gather and select promising alternative strategies.

Data Analysis

1. Conduct an analysis of data.

2. Engage the workgroup to review the data analysis, clarify and prioritize needs.

3. Set the vision for your program improvement initiative.

4. Gather and select promising alternative strategies.

Research Findings

1. Access research findings.

2. Understand the focus, questions, and implications.

3. Judge potential contributions and compatibility with your program policies and practices.

4. Use: Assess the impact and set the vision for your program improvement initiative.

5. Cost out and budget the initiative.

6. Set six-month benchmarks.

7. Pilot and adapt it to fit your program (for research, adapt the system to integrate the findings).

8. Link to other initiatives.

9. Design and provide staff development resources.

10. Design and provide support and other resources.

11. Bring on the first wave of classes.

12. Measure the impact on goals and tweak.

13. Bring on subsequent waves of classes.

14. Measure the impact on goals and tweak.

15. Fully integrate the initiatives.

16. Measure impact based on goals.

17. Celebrate success!

HHaannddoouutt # 1

Page 23: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

23

Data Analysis

1. Conduct an analysis of data.

2. Engage the workgroup to review the data analysis, clarify and prioritize needs.

3. Set the vision for your program improvement initiative.

Data Analysis Process

• Identify your key program components.

• Determine the critical success factors for each component.

• Identify and collect the data you need.

• Analyze and interpret the data to determine problems/red flags.

• Develop probing questions to isolate possible causes.

• Return to the Trident.

Page 24: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

24

Step 1: Identify the Key Program Components

• What is most important to you

• For today’s workshop:– Enrollment: Are the students coming?– Retention: Are they staying?– Federal Performance Measures: Are they

learning? Are they meeting their goals?• Learning Gains• High School Credential• Transition to Postsecondary/Job Training• Employment Goals

Page 25: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

25

Step 2: Determining Critical Success Factors

What criteria do you use to determine if your

program components are successful?

Page 26: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

26

Step 2: Determining Critical Success Factors

Program Component

Sample Critical Success Factors

Student Enrollment • Classes are full.• Enrollment reflects the community.• Our cost per student reflects the state’s average for

similar programs.

Student Retention • Students are staying for at least 12 hours.• Students are staying until they meet their goals.

Learning Gains • Students are completing EFL’s.

Completion of HS Credential

• Students with that goal are earning a high school credential.

Transition to Postsecondary/Job Training

• Students with that goal are enrolling in postsecondary education/job training.

Employment • Students with employment goals are employed.

HO

#3

Page 27: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

27

Step 2: Determining Critical Success Factors

Any other success factors?

Page 28: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

28

Step 3: Identifying and Collecting the Data

1. What data do you already have that will answer your question?

2. What additional existing data, if any, will you need to answer your question?

3. Where are you going to get the additional data?

Page 29: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

29

Activity 2: Data Data Everywhere

Small Groups:

Group 1: Enrollment

Group 2: Learning Gains

Group 3: High School, Postsecondary, Employment

Page 30: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

30

Activity 2: Data Data Everywhere

For your group’s designated program component/s and critical success factors, determine:

1. What data do you already have that will answer your question?

2. What additional existing data, if any, will you need to answer your question?

3. Where are you going to get the additional data?

Page 31: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

31

A Look at the Census

• Making Sense of the Census

• Types of Data Available– Data Tables

– Data Maps

Aldklakljf

akldflkasd

apsod rfedsojk

rtyjklc 2345678 03948577

ertkijrd 756839320 2938384746

Page 32: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

32

Census Levels

1. US

2. State

3. County

4. County Subdivisions

5. Census Tracts

6. Zip Codes

Page 33: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

33

NRS Tables: Up Close and Personal

A Look at Your MAERS ReportsA Look at Your MAERS Reports

• What information do they contain?

• What do they tell us?

• Do you trust the data?

Page 34: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

34

Step 4: Analyzing and Interpreting the DataFinding the Red FlagsFinding the Red Flags

• Determining what is good enough

– Are there specific performance benchmarks you must meet?

– Are there other program standards you have established?

– Do you know the state average for a particular component (i.e., average cost per student, average number of instructional hours/student)?

Page 35: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

35

Sample Red Flag IndicatorsProgram

ComponentRed Flag Indicators:

What is good enough? What could indicate a problem?

Student Enrollment

• (40%) or more of classes have less than 10 student hours for each teacher hour.

• There is a difference of (__%) or more between the percentage of a particular population trait enrolled in our program and the percentage of that population trait in our community.

• Our cost per student is (125%) or more of the state cost for similar programs.

Student Retention • (10%) or more of our students leave before reaching 12 hours.

• Less than (60%) of our students meet their primary/secondary goals.

HO

#4

Page 36: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

36

Sample Red Flag IndicatorsProgram

ComponentRed Flag Indicators:

What is good enough? What could indicate a problem?

Learning Gains

(HO#7)

• One or more of our EFL performance percentages is below the state target percentages.

Completion of HS Credential

• Our performance is below the state target percentage.

Postsecondary/JobTraining

• Our performance is below the state target percentage.

Employment • Our performance is below the state target percentage.

• Less than (__%) of our unemployed students have an employment goal.

Page 37: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

37

Presenting the Data

Enrollment by Racial/Ethnic Group

3% 9%

20%

32%

33%

3%

AmericanIndian/AlaskanNative

Asian

Black (notHispanic)

Hispanic

White

Native Hawaiian orOther PacificIslander

Page 38: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

38

Presenting the Data

Page 39: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

39

Data Presentation ExamplesLine Chart

Page 40: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

40

Activity 3: Red Light, Green Light

• For your group’s program component:

– Examine the data you have

• Were there additional data that would have been helpful to have? What?

– Determine if there are any red flags

• Were the data consistent with the critical success factors? Were there gaps?

– Graphically display your findings on the flip chart (graph, chart, etc.)

Page 41: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

41

Focusing the Data

If you know why,

you can

figure out how…

(W. Edwards Deming)

Page 42: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

42

Step 5: Developing probing questions to isolate possible causes.

• What questions do I need to ask?

• Resources:

–Red Flag chart

–50 Questions handout

–Super Duper program self-assessment

Page 43: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

43

Developing Measurable QuestionsRED FLAG: Failed to meet state performance target

for Low Intermediate Students• Poor Question:

• Does my program have good teachers?• Good Question:

• Does student learning differ by average number of instructional hours?

• Better Question:• What are the differences between the average

number of instructional hours for low intermediate students and high intermediate students?

Page 44: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

44

Developing Measurable Questions

RED FLAG: Failed to meet state performance target

for students earning a high school credential.• Poor Question:

– Do teachers/directors know how to set realistic student goals for high school completion?

• Good Question:– What entry EFL produces the most high

school/GED completions?• Better Question:

– How do the entry EFLs differ among students with high school/GED completion goals who actually earn a credential?

Page 45: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

45

“Let’s do unto the data

before the

data gets done unto you.”

(Edie Holcomb)

Page 46: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

46

Sample Probing QuestionsProgram

ComponentSample Probing Questions

Student Enrollment • Are there differences in instructional setting (e.g., instructional setting, types of students, location, recruitment strategies, teacher preparation) between classes that meet the standard and those that don’t?

• What strategies are we using to recruit each under-enrolled target group?

• What evidence do we have that demonstrates the most effective recruitment strategies for each under-enrolled target population?

• Are there particular circumstances (e.g., full-time teachers) that are driving our cost per student above the state average?

HOHO

#5#5

Page 47: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

47

Sample Probing QuestionsProgram

ComponentSample Probing Questions

Student Retention • Is there a difference between the student intake and orientation procedures in classes with strong student retention versus weak student retention?

• Is there a difference between student demographics (e.g., age, gender, ethnicity, goals) between classes with strong and weak student retention?

• Is there a relationship between average hours of attendance and % completing EFLs?

• Is a thorough process being used for realistic student goal setting? What is our process?

• Is the individual learning plan, curriculum, and instruction linked to student goals?

• Are there significant barriers to attendance (e.g., childcare, transportation, etc.)?

HOHO

#6#6

Page 48: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

48

Sample Probing QuestionsProgram

ComponentSample Probing Questions

Learning Gains • Is there a relationship between completion of EFL’s and average instructional hours?

• Can our teachers identify what is not working (e.g., assessment, placement, instruction, materials, data input, special learning needs)?

• Is there a relationship between completion of EFL’s and instructional setting (e.g., learning lab versus classroom)?

• Is there a relationship between years of teacher experience and completion of EFL’s?

• Is there a relationship between part-time and full-time teachers with completion of EFL’s?

Additional Questions for Class/Teacher-Specific Data

Page 49: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

49

Sample Probing QuestionsProgram

ComponentSample Probing Questions

High School Credential

• What criteria are teachers/directors using in setting GED completion goals? Are they realistic for the program year?

• How accurate is the process we are using to document completion of GED’s?

• How do the entry EFL’s differ among students with high school/GED completion goals who actually earn and don’t earn a credential?

• Can our teachers identify what is not working (i.e., assessment, placement, instruction, materials, data input, special learning needs)?

Page 50: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

50

Sample Probing QuestionsProgram

ComponentSample Probing Questions

Transition to Postsecondary Education/Job Training

• What criteria are being used when setting postsecondary education goals? Are they realistic for the program year?

• What transitional services are being provided to assist students with the enrollment process?

• How reliable is our student follow-up process to document enrollment in college or job training programs?

• Can our teachers identify what is not working (i.e., goal setting, transition strategies, follow-up data, curriculum matched to goal)?

Page 51: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

51

Sample Probing QuestionsProgram

ComponentSample Probing Questions

Employment • What criteria are being used when setting employment goals? Are they realistic for the program year?

• What transitional services are being provided to assist students with obtaining and/or retaining employment?

• How reliable is our student follow-up process to document employment?

• Can our teachers identify what is not working (i.e., goal setting, transition strategies, follow-up data, curriculum matched to goal)?

• What is the relationship between the number of unemployed students and those with employment goals?

Page 52: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

52

Activity 4: What Questions Would You Ask?

In your small groups:

• Identify some possible reasons for the scenarios in the Activity 4 handout, all of which were gleaned from various data reports.

• What questions would you need to ask to isolate the problem?

• What might you do to address the problem?

Page 53: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

53

Self Assessment

1. Administer a program self assessment.

2. Engage the workgroup to review the self assessment, clarify and prioritize needs.

3. Set the vision for your program improvement initiative.

4. Gather and select promising alternative strategies.

Data Analysis

1. Conduct an analysis of data.

2. Engage the workgroup to review the data analysis, clarify and prioritize needs.

3. Set the vision for your program improvement initiative.

4. Gather and select promising alternative strategies.

Research Findings

1. Access research findings.

2. Understand the focus, questions, and implications.

3. Judge potential contributions and compatibility with your program policies and practices.

4. Use: Assess the impact and set the vision for your program improvement initiative.

5. Cost out and budget the initiative.

6. Set six-month benchmarks.

7. Pilot and adapt it to fit your program (for research, adapt the system to integrate the findings).

8. Link to other initiatives.

9. Design and provide staff development resources.

10. Design and provide support and other resources.

11. Bring on the first wave of classes.

12. Measure the impact on goals and tweak.

13. Bring on subsequent waves of classes.

14. Measure the impact on goals and tweak.

15. Fully integrate the initiatives.

16. Measure impact based on goals.

17. Celebrate success!

Page 54: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

54

Data Analysis

1. Conduct an analysis of data.

2. Engage the workgroup to review the data analysis, clarify and prioritize needs.

3. Set the vision for your program improvement initiative.

Data Analysis Process

• Identify your key program components.

• Determine the critical success factors for each component.

• Identify and collect the data you need.

• Analyze and interpret the data to determine problems/red flags.

• Develop probing questions to isolate the problems.

• Return to the Trident.

Page 55: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

55

Planning the Work/Working the Plan

Creating a Structure and Process for Data UseCreating a Structure and Process for Data Use

1. How will you engage staff in looking at data (i.e., annually during a staff meeting, creating a data use study group, etc.)?

2. When will this occur?

3. What resources, if any, will you need to do this?

4. How will you evaluate the process and results?

Page 56: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

56

Part I Training Objectives

• By the end of today’s workshop, you will be able to:– Identify types and sources of available data for

use in program improvement,– Generate appropriate questions to ask about

the data,– Determine appropriate indicators for flagging

potential problems/red flags, and– Establish a structure and process for using data

to promote continuous improvement.

Page 57: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

57

Part I Training Objectives

– Developing critical success factors for key program components,

– Identifying types and sources of available data for those components,

– Determining appropriate indicators for flagging potential problems/red flags,

– Generating appropriate questions to identify possible causes of red flags, and

– Developing a structure to apply what you learned.

By the end of today’s workshop, you will be able to use a data analysis process to promote continuous improvement by:

Page 58: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

58

Using Data to Your Advantage

(i.e., as a carrot)

is up to you.

Page 59: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

59

Quote of the Day

“People without information

cannot act.

People with information cannot

help but act.”

(Ken Blanchard)

Page 60: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

60

Focusing the Data

If you know why,

you can

figure out how…

(W. Edwards Deming)

Page 61: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

61

Presenters

Always willing to help…

– Lennox McLendon

[email protected]

– Kathi Polis

[email protected]

Page 62: 1 Part I: Finding the Red Flags in Your Data Part II: Student Retention – Sharing What Works Michigan Administrative Leadership Institute Building World

62

Thank you very much!

• This project was developed by Florida Human This project was developed by Florida Human Resources Development, Inc. (FHRD) and the Resources Development, Inc. (FHRD) and the National Adult Education Professional Development National Adult Education Professional Development Consortium, Inc., in cooperation with the Michigan Consortium, Inc., in cooperation with the Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Growth and Department of Labor and Economic Growth and funded through a grant under Section 222(a)(2) State funded through a grant under Section 222(a)(2) State Leadership Activities of the Adult Education and Leadership Activities of the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act, Title II of the Workforce Family Literacy Act, Title II of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998, amended. Investment Act of 1998, amended.

• For more information visit:For more information visit:• http://www.maepd.orghttp://www.maepd.org