Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
This document and reference materials may contain forward-looking statements, but please understand that actual results may differsignificantly from these forecasts due to various factors.*Reportable segments were changed in FY18/3.*Past figures are retrospectively adjusted, due to a change in accounting policy in a subsidiary in the Leasing Business.
1. Problems Concerning Construction Defects
1-1 Construction Defects Overview 4
1-2 Construction Defects by Apartment Series 5
1-3 Status of Investigations 6
1-4 Number of Buildings with Defects by Time Period 7
1-5 Establishment of External Investigation Committee andMeasures to Prevent Recurrence 8
1-6 Extraordinary Losses 9
2. About Leopalace21
2-1 Business Model of Core Businesses 11
2-2-1 Results Trend 12
2-2-2 Highlights of Results Trend 13
3. FY19/3 Results
3-1 Highlights of Results 15
3-2 Results of Business Segments 16
3-3-1 Main Indicators of Leasing 17
3-3-2 Occupancy Rate Trend 18
3-3-3 Occupancy Rates after Announcement of ConstructionDefects 19
3-4-1 Main Indicators of Development 20
3-4-2 Orders and Sales 21
4. FY20/3 Plan
4-1 Plan 23
4-2 Plan by Business Segments 24
4-3-1 Main Indicators of Leasing 25
4-3-2 Occupancy Rate Forecasts 26
4-3-3 Demand of Leasing Clients 27
4-4-1 Main Indicators of Development 28
4-4-2 Contracts Plan 29
4-5 Reduction in SGAE 30
5. Overview of Business (Leasing)
5-1-1 Indicator (Occupancy by Group) 32
5-1-2 Indicator (Shares of Occupied Units by Group) 33
5-1-3 Indicator (Occupied Units by Industry) 34
5-1-4 Indicator (Foreign Tenants) 35
5-2-1 Leasing Strategy (Office Expansion) 36
5-2-2 Leasing Strategy (my DIY and Security Systems) 37
5-2-3 Leasing Strategy (Tenant Services) 38
5-2-4 Leasing Strategy (IoT, AI) 39
5-2-5 Leasing Strategy (Subsidiary Businesses) 40
5-2-6 Leasing Strategy (Minpaku) 41
1
6. Overview of Business (Development)
6-1 Indicator (Offices and Apartment Construction) 43
6-2-1 Development Strategy (Ideal Land Usage) 44
6-2-2 Development Strategy (Apartment Construction) 45
6-2-3 Development Strategy (Social Welfare/Stores) 46
6-2-4 Development Strategy (Homes/Development) 47
6-2-5 Development Strategy (After-sale Services) 48
7. Overview of Business (Others and International)
7-1 Others (Elderly Care Business) 50
7-2 Others (Domestic Hotels Business) 51
7-3 Others (Resort Business) 52
7-4-1 International (Leasing Business Overseas) 53
7-4-2 International (Serviced Apartments and Offices) 54
7-4-3 International (Other Services) 55
7-5 Work Style Reforming 56
Appendix 1. Supplementary Data
App.1-1 Corporate Profile 58
App.1-2 Medium-term Management Plan Key Pointsand Strategy 59
App.1-3-1 Numerical Targets (Consolidated) 60
App.1-3-2 Quarter Comparison 61
App.1-3-3 Results of Leopalace21 Group 62
Appendix 1. (cont’d)
App.1-4-1 Indicator (Occupancy by Group) 63
App.1-4-2 Indicator (Foreign Tenants) 64
App.1-4-3 Indicator (Units and Occupancy Rates by Area) 65
App.1-4-4 Indicator (Occupancy Rates by Building Age) 66
App.1-4-5 Indicator (Contract Type) 67
App.1-4-6 Indicator (Solar Power Systems) 68
App.1-4-7 Indicator (Resources of finance for construction) 69
App.1-4-8 Indicator (“Azumi En” Area Disposition) 70
App.1-5-1 Finance (Balance Sheets) 71
App.1-5-2 Finance (Cash/Deposits and Interest-bearing Debt) 72
App.1-5-3 Finance (Cash Flows) 73
App.1-5-4 Finance (Shareholder Composition) 74
Appendix 2. Market Trends
App.2-1 Future Estimate of Population of Japan 76
App.2-2 Number of Households 77
App.2-3 New Housing Starts 78
App.2-4 New Housing Starts (Leased Units) 79
App.2-5 Vacant Rental Dwellings 80
App.2-6 Population Inflows and Outflows 81
App.2-7 Rental Housing Starts and Leopalace21Completions by Area 82
App.2-8 No. of Built Apartments by Area 83
App.2-9 International Students in Japan 84
2
Balcony Upper floor
A-1 A-2
A-3
Balcony
Terrace
Upper floor
Lower floor
Common
hallway
Common
hallway
A-1 A-2
A-3
Construction defects that Leopalace21 announced on and after April 27, 2018 are classified into 4 types as below. Needs or ways for tenantsto vacate or repair period etc. depend on construction defects.
1. Defects in Parting Walls2. Defects on Insulation Materials in
Walls
3. Defects on Exterior Wall
Specifications4. Defects of Ceiling
DefectsOverview
The parting walls were not constructed insmall-scale attic or spaces above ceiling
The foamed urethane was used as insulationmaterial in parting walls although theconstruction certification documents describeto use glass wool or rock wool
The exterior walls do not meet thespecifications certified by the Minister ofLand, Infrastructure and Transport
The construction of ceilings does not meetthe specifications certified by the MLITNotice as described in the constructioncertification documents
Description Discuss with property owners and specificadministrative agencies and determine repairwork
Presence of series that are repairableoutside and series that are required to repairone by one*
Discuss with property owners and specificadministrative agencies and determine repairwork
Inform tenants about moving
Discuss with property owners and specificadministrative agencies and determine repairwork
Inform tenants about moving
Promptly inform tenants about moving, dueto low fireproof function
Out of 4,518 of tenants living in propertiesmanaged by the company, about 84% havealready moved out or determined the date tomove out (As of April 30)
Example ofIllustration
No parting walls in the entire attic
No parting walls inintermediate floor
A-1
No parting wallsin eavesA-2 A-3
【Conceptual diagram】 【Conceptual diagram】
【Actual content of work】 【Actual content of work】 【Actual content of work】
【Conceptual diagram】Exterior wall (outside)
*For example, Nail Series are repairable by entering attic from outside, but 6 Series need to be repaired one by one. Please refer to next page about our representative apartment series.
Parting Walls Exterior Walls Ceiling
Rock wool acoustical board (9mm) overreinforced plasterboard (12.5mm)
Plasterboard
t=12.5mm double wall
Plasterboard
t=12.5mm double wall
Grass wool orrock wool filling
Base surfaceunder 606mm
Base surface about 455mm
Glass wool
Inside reinforcedplasterboard(Plasterboard is fireproof)
Siding
Exterior wall (inside)
Exterior wall (outside) Exterior wall (inside)
Decorative plasterboard(9mm) over reinforcedplasterboard (12.5mm)
Decorative plasterboard(9.5mm)one ceiling
Plasterboardt=12.5mm double wall
Plasterboardt=12.5mm double wall
Filled withurethane foam
The red areas indicate areas that do not confirm withthe notified specifications
Excess space betweenbase surfaces
Urethane foam
SidingInside reinforcedplasterboard(Plasterboard is fireproof)
The red areas indicate areas that do not confirm withthe minister’s certification
The red areas indicate areas that do not confirm withthe minister’s certification
4
Buildings Subject to Top-Priority Investigations (15,283 buildings) Others (23,802 buildings)
Nail Series (913 buildings) Subject 6 Series (14,370 buildings) Villa Alta (153 buildings) Other Series (23,649 buildings)
Serie
s
Series NameConstructionPeriod
Gold Nail (Wooden)1994 – 1997
New Gold Nail (Wooden)1994 – 1997
Gold Residence (Steel)1996 – 2001
New Silver Residence (Wooden)1997 – 2001
New Gold Residence (Steel)1998 – 2002
Special Steel Residence (Steel)1999 – 2001
Better Steel Residence (Steel)2000 – 2001
Con Grazia (Wooden, Steel)2000 – 2014
Villa Alta (AGR) (Steel)1999 – 2001
Other 41 Series1991 – 2018
Constru
ction
Defe
cts
Parting Walls ✓ ✓*Defects caused by inadequate
construction supervision*Defects caused by inadequate
construction supervision
InsulationMaterials in Walls
✓
Exterior WallSpecifications
✓ ✓
Ceiling ✓
Exte
rior
* Villa Alta(AGR) refers to those constructed from September 14,1999 to February 9, 2001
Villa Alta (AGR)Gold Nail
New Gold Nail
GoldResidence
Special SteelResidence
New SilverResidence
New GoldResidence
Con GraziaBetter SteelResidence
Construction defects were caused by (i) non-conformity with design documents, etc. and (ii) non-conformity with minister’s certification specifications, or the use of partsthat do not meet the standards of the Building Standard Law. Subject buildings are classified as buildings subject to top-priority investigations. In addition, it was discoveredthat defects in attic parting walls, etc. due to inadequate supervision of construction were found in 1,506 buildings other than buildings subject to top-priority investigations(as of March 31, 2019), and these will also be repaired.
3
Gold Residence andNew Gold Residence
(1,271 buildings)
(53 buildings)
5
Around 50% of a total of 39,085 buildings have been investigated, and we aim to complete investigation of buildings other than those subject to top-priority investigations bysummer 2019. We plan to complete repairs on buildings subject to top-priority investigations by summer 2019 and complete repairs on all buildings by October of the sameyear.
* Apart from listed above, we confirmed minor construction deficiencies in 7,514 buildings out of 20,285 investigated buildings, which we will repair.
Buildings subject to top-priorityinvestigations
Others
Total
Product Type: Nail Series 6 Series SubtotalVilla Alta(AGR)
Others Subtotal
Number of constructedbuildings
913 14,370 15,283 153 23,649 23,802 39,085
Number of buildings managedby Leopalace21
191 13,353 13,544 150 21,742 21,892 35,436
Number of buildingscommenced investigation
907 13,286 14,193 46 7,572 7,618 21,811
Number of Investigatedbuildings
902 11,828 12,730 46 7,509 7,555 20,285
Investigation rate(vs number ofconstructed buildings)
98.8% 82.3% 83.3% 30.1% 31.7% 31.7% 51.9%
Number of defective buildings 867 4,712 5,579 10 1,496 1,506 7,085
Defect rate(vs number ofinvestigated buildings)
96.1% 39.8% 43.8% 21.74% 19.92% 19.9% 34.9%
(As of March 31, 2019)
5
(Reference)Number of rooms which resumed tenant recruitment: 22,368
6
8,524
4,208
2,548
1,019458
24,505
8,522
3,031
4,688
822
6,056
0 0
1,848
2260
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
The start of construction of buildings subject to top-priority investigations is concentrated between 1990s to 2007.The percentage of buildingswith defects has decreased due to strengthening of the inspection system (obtaining ISO9001 in 2008) and the strengthening of corporategovernance.
(No. ofbuildings)
No. of buildings by construction starting period of each series and no. of defects in parting walls of attics, etc. (as of March 31, 2019)
~ 1999
TotalBuildings subject to
top-priorityinvestigations
Others
2000 ~ 2007 2008 ~
TotalBuildings subject to
top-priorityinvestigations
Others TotalBuildings subject to
top-priorityinvestigations
Others
60.6%
44.9%
35.6%
17.5%
12.2%
7
As announced on February 27, 2019, in order to objectively investigate construction defects, weestablished an external investigation committee made up of neutral and impartial experts who arecompletely independent from the Company in accordance with the “Third Party CommitteeGuidelines in the Event of Corporate Scandals” (Japan Federation of Bar Associations).
As announced on March 18, 2019, the investigation committee prepared a report.
Going forward, a final report concerning measures to prevent recurrence and responsibilities ofinternal directors is scheduled to be prepared by late May 2019
1. External investigation committee (Nishimura & Asahi)
1-5: Establishment of External Investigation Committee and Measures to Prevent Recurrence
As announced on March 28, 2019, a Compliance Management Division has been newly established,led by newly created position of Chief Legal Officer (CLO).
When launching new products or changing parts and materials for existing products, we will confirmthat there is no doubt about compliance with laws and regulations, through checks by the newlyestablished Construction Legal Department, as well as inquiries to outside experts (third-partyorganizations). Also, this department will be in charge of on-site inspections to function as a checksand balance.
We will consider increasing outside directors to enhance governance.
Following the final report by the investigation committee in late May, we will prepareadditional measures to prevent recurrence
2. Measures to prevent recurrence
8
In the fourth quarter of the fiscal yearended March 31, 2019, we will record anadditional extraordinary loss of 11.7 billionyen (total 54.7 billion yen), due torefinements of repair cost estimates andchanges in defect ratios of properties notsubject to top-priority investigations.
Previously, to prepare for the risk of vacancies, an estimated loss based on current rental income andexpected future occupancy rates for each apartment was recorded in cost of sales in the LeasingBusiness.
We have recorded 9.6 billion yen as a provision to the reserve for apartment vacancy loss, due todecreases in occupancy rates from suspension of tenant recruitment caused by the problem ofconstruction defects. This loss is transient and large, and will not occur in ordinary business activities,and therefore has been recorded in extraordinary losses.
*Cost that we pay as the lessee as a compensation of vacant rooms ofproperties managed by other companies, due to construction defects
Breakdown of reserve
Repair costs
Other expenses(relocation, investigation,rent compensation ofvacant rooms inapartments managed byother companies)
9
Business Model
Leopalace21 is a real estate company with two core businesses: the Development Business which constructs apartments mainlyfor single persons, and the Leasing Business which manages these apartments. The Leasing Business makes up over 80% ofsales, and we are moving forward to establish a stock-based business model capable of generating stable profits.
Responsive to tenant needsResponsive to owner needsApartment construction leads to inheritance tax reduction,and supports asset inheritance
Our Master Lease System pays rents for all units in buildingsregardless of vacancies for up to 30 years
Total support from construction to management andoperation
Nationwide network centered on three major metro areaswhere tenant demand is strong
Provide high value added services such as furnishedapartments with furniture, home appliances, andIoT devices
No brokerage fees (LP21 leases directly from landowners)
Leasing
Business
Development
Business
4.Rent
income
Owners Tenants
2.Masterlease
1.Construction
contractor
3.Sub-lease
Business model(Rooms)As of March 31, 2019
Tokyo metro 170,000
Tohoku 36,000
Chubu88,000
Kinki81,000
Chugoku39,000
Kyushu &Okinawa
51,000Shikoku15,000
Hokuriku &Koshinetsu
40,000
Hokkaido 14,000
Kita Kanto 40,000
Rooms under management
No. 1 in Japan in lease management of rental units for people living alone (570,000 rooms)
11
334.5 342.3 355.7 379.0 383.6 388.5 399.3 410.6421.3 435.5 426.3
421.2
359.1237.0
107.8 62.9 53.3 63.1 61.3 74.1 80.3 76.5 58.9 59.7
733.2
620.3
483.5 458.2 454.2 470.8 483.2511.5 520.4 530.8 505.2 502.2
50.1
-29.7 -24.4
3.37.4
13.4 14.821.0 22.8 22.9
7.32.2
-20
0
20
40
60
80
-200
0
200
400
600
800
46%
49%
5%
Sales (Billion yen) Operating profit (Billion yen)
Results Trend
*Figures for FY17/3 adjusted to new segments
Occupancy rate (average)
Leasing
Development
Others
Operating Profits
FY19/3Sales
FY09/3Sales
Decrease in occupancy rates and rent, as well as stringent loan screening caused by the Lehman Collapse led to a decrease inapartment construction, and Leopalace21 reported operating losses for two consecutive years. However, structural reformmeasures such as leasing cost cuts were implemented in order to target a stable earnings structure for the mid to long term.Structural reforms were completed during the previous midterm management plan, and we are building the basis of our newgrowth business fields.
-300
84%
12%4%
88.51%
82.25%80.09%
81.16%82.94%
84.58%86.57%
87.95%88.53%90.59%
88.34%
85.20%
80%
95%
FY09/3 FY10/3 FY11/3 FY12/3 FY13/3 FY14/3 FY15/3 FY16/3 FY17/3 FY18/3 FY19/3 FY20/3(Plan)
12
Highlights of Results Trend
(Billion yen) FY09/3 FY10/3 FY11/3 FY12/3 FY13/3 FY14/3 FY15/3 FY16/3 FY17/3 FY18/3 FY19/3
Net sales 733.2 620.3 483.5 458.2 454.2 470.8 483.2 511.5 520.4 530.8 505.2
Leasing 334.5 342.3 355.7 379.0 383.6 388.5 399.3 410.6 421.3 435.5 426.3
Development(Construction)
359.1 237.0 107.8 62.9 53.3 63.1 61.3 74.1 80.3 76.5 58.9
Operating profit 50.1 -29.7 -24.4 3.3 7.4 13.4 14.8 21.0 22.8 22.9 7.3
Leasing -1.5 -47.8 -30.8 4.0 8.7 15.3 20.5 22.8 23.0 26.0 14.9
Development(Construction)
70.1 29.7 11.8 4.2 2.7 2.9 0.2 3.3 5.7 3.6 -0.9
Net income 9.9 -79.0 -41.7 0.3 13.3 15.7 15.1 19.6 20.4 14.8 -68.6
Managed units*(1,000 units)
506 551 571 556 546 549 554 561 568 570 57.4
Occupancy rate* 88.5% 82.3% 80.1% 81.2% 82.9% 84.6% 86.6% 88.0% 88.5% 90.6% 88.3%
Orders received 337.8 250.2 80.3 50.0 73.0 81.1 87.3 86.4 92.8 87.6 73.3
Before the Lehman Collapse in 2008, Leopalace21’s main profit driver was the Construction Business (current DevelopmentBusiness). After the Lehman Collapse, we shifted our business model through structural reforms, generating profit from theLeasing Business.
*“Net income” refers to “net income attributable to shareholders of the parent”*Figures for managed units are as of the end of the final month for each fiscal year*Occupancy rate is the average value for each fiscal year*Figures for FY17/3 adjusted to new segments*Past figures are retrospectively adjusted, due to a change in accounting policy in a subsidiary in the Leasing Business
13
14
Highlights of Results
We recorded a net loss due to extraordinary losses related to repairs and impairment losses (loss on sales of our apartmentproperties) as well as deterioration of our business results caused by construction defects. A net loss is the first time in eightyears since FY11/3.
*“Net income” refers to “net income attributable to shareholders of the parent”.*FY19/3 Full-year Plan reflects earnings forecasts revisions announced on February 7, 2019.
15
(Million yen)FY18/3Actual
FY19/3
Plan
FY19/3
Actual YoYCompared to
Plan
Sales 530,840510,000
~516,000505,223 -25,616
-4,777~-10,777
Gross profit 96,07780,500
~83,00076,235 -19,842
-4,265~-6,765
% 18.1% 15.8~16.1% 15.1% -3.0p -0.7p
SGAE 73,14773,000
~72,50068,844 -4,302
-4,156~-3,656
Operating profit 22,9307,500
~10,5007,390 -15,539
-110~-3,110
% 4.3% 1.5~2.0% 1.5% -2.8p -0.0p
Recurring profit 22,3547,000
~10,0007,063 -15,291
+63~-2,937
% 4.2% 1.4~1.9% 1.4% -2.8p +0.0p
Net income (loss)* 14,819-40,000
~-38,000-68,662 -83,481
-28,662~-30,662
(Million yen)18/3
Actual19/3Plan
19/3Actual YoY
Compared toPlan
Sales 435,537429,500
~432,500426,388 -9,148
-3,112~-6,112
Gross profit 76,40668,700
~71,00062,961 -13,444
-5,739~-8,039
Operating profit 26,06216,600
~19,00014,987 -11,074
-1,613~-4,013
Sales 76,58762,000
~64,00058,992 -17,595
-2,008~-5,008
Gross profit 21,35514,100
~14,70014,343 -7,011
+243~-357
Operating profit 3,663-2,800
~-2,200-995 -4,659
+1,805~+1,205
Sales 12,807 14,000 13,922 +1,115 -78
Gross profit -105 500 598 +703 +98
Operating profit -1,596 -1,000 -846 +749 +154
Sales 5,908 5,500 5,919 +11 +419
Gross profit 2,042 1,500 2,094 +51 +594
Operating profit -846 -1,300 -1,346 -500 -46
Adjust-ments
Operating profit -4,353 -4,000 -4,407 -54 -407
In the Leasing Business, both occupancy rates and profits decreased because the Company suspended recruitment of new tenants into buildings subjectto top-priority investigations. In the Development Business, both sales and profits decreased YoY since orders decreased due to the negative environmentsurrounding the apartment construction industry. In the Elderly Care Business, sales and profit exceeded forecasts as a result of improvement of existingfacilities’ occupancy rates. In the Hotels, Resort & Other Businesses, sales exceeded forecasts although sales and profits decreased YoY due to renewalworks.
Results of Business Segments
*Gross profit/Sales*FY19/3 Full-year Plan reflects earnings forecasts revisions announced on February 7, 2019
16
*17.5% *14.8%
*27.9% *24.3%
*16.0%~16.4%
*23.1%~23.0%
(Million yen)FY16/3Actual
FY17/3Actual
FY18/3Actual
FY19/3Actual
Sales 410,641 421,342 435,537 426,388
Gross profit 67,337 70,142 76,406 62,961
Operating profit 22,848 23,009 26,062 14,987
Units under management(as of the end of FY)
561,961 568,739 570,672 574,798戸
Occupancy rate (average) 87.95% 88.53% 90.59% 88.34%
Direct offices(as of the end of FY)
189 189 189 189
Number of corporate salessection (as of the end of FY)
60 60 59 54
Number of employees(non-consolidated, as of the end of FY)
3,150 3,284 3,247 3,241
of which, sales employees 1,603 1,701 1,546 1,494
Main Indicators (Leasing)
*16.4% *16.6% *17.5%
*Gross profit/Sales *Figures for FY17/3 adjusted to new segments
17
*14.8%
82%
84%
86%
88%
90%
92%
94%
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
FY 2015/3 FY 2016/3 FY 2017/3 FY 2018/3 FY 2019/3
Occupancy Rate
Occupancy rate for March 2019 was 84.33%, decreasing more than 8p since April 2018. This decrease was mainly due tosuspension of new tenant recruitment in properties subject to top-priority investigations as well as decrease of individual tenants.Occupancy rates remained stable after January, since we were able to resume recruitment in certain properties. However, due todecrease in individual tenants, the occupancy rate in March decreased month-on-month.
(Occupancy rate = Occupied units / Managed units, %)
18
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep1H
Avg.Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Avg.
FY16/3 87.88 87.61 87.59 87.32 87.26 87.70 87.56 87.26 87.14 86.89 88.38 89.80 90.53 87.95
FY17/3 88.97 88.55 88.60 87.95 87.78 88.31 88.36 87.50 87.41 86.97 88.41 90.18 91.66 88.53
FY18/3 90.51 90.28 90.55 89.75 89.88 90.21 90.20 89.73 89.69 89.44 90.83 92.43 93.72 90.59
FY19/3 92.82 92.76 92.10 90.45 89.41 88.40 90.99 87.24 86.38 85.26 85.38 85.57 84.33 88.34
92.82%
92.76%
92.10% 90.45%
89.41%
88.40%
87.24%
86.38%
85.26%
85.38% 85.57%84.33%
92.18%
87.86%
81.98%
77.87%
74.55%
71.11%
68.78%
66.57% 65.65% 66.79%
64.91%
93.09%
94.50%95.25% 95.94% 96.24% 96.36% 96.32% 95.81% 96.51% 96.16%
95.25%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
FY19/3 FY19/3Properties subject to top-priority investigations
FY19/3Properties not subject to top-priority investigations
Occupancy Rates by Apartment Types
Since the confirmation of construction defects, new tenant recruitments of properties subject to top-priority investigations was suspended,and occupancy rate decreased every month. Meanwhile, rental demand is high backed by external factors such as labor shortages, and theoccupancy rate of properties not subject to top-priority investigations (not suspended) is 95-96%. In the future, we will resume tenantrecruitment by investigating and repairing properties in an effort to raise the overall occupancy rate.
Occupancy rates fell 7.5p from April toDecember 2018, mainly due to suspensionof tenant recruitment in top-priorityproperties.Occupancy rates fell 1p every month.
Since we resumed tenantrecruitment on certain propertiesafter January 2019, there was abottom-up effect on occupancyrates to a certain degree.
19
Main Indicators (Development)
(Million yen)FY16/3Actual
FY17/3Actual
FY18/3Actual
FY19/3Actual
Sales 74,160 80,321 76,587 58,992
Gross profit 20,268 23,124 21,355 14,343
Operating profit 3,340 5,786 3,663 -995
Contract amount 86,439 92,852 87,628 73,325
of which, apartments and
other buildings86,439 87,592 75,905 64,495
of which, real estate
development0 5,260 11,722 8,829
Offices(as of the and of FY)
60 60 60 50
Number of employees(non-consolidated, as of the end of FY)
1,686 1,469 1,450 1,365
of which, sales personnel 427 566 530 475
*27.3% *28.8% *27.9%
*Gross profit/Sales *Figures for FY17/3 adjusted to new segments *For real estate development, contract amount = sales
20
*24.3%
Subcontracting Real estate development
Gross Orders
Orders and Sales
FY17/3 FY18/3
Competition intensified due to strategic limitation of business areas in metropolitan areas. Orders decreased compared to theprevious year and did not achieve plans, due to negative media reports about apartment construction, apartment loans, and theproblems concerning parting wall construction deficiencies.
21
FY19/3
(Billion yen)FY17/3 FY18/3 FY19/3
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY
Orders fromsubcontracting(buildings)
244 254 243 217 958 214 222 204 232 872 212 214 201 143 770
(Billion yen) 22.4 21.8 22.3 20.9 87.5 19.2 18.6 17.6 20.3 75.9 16.3 17.8 18.8 11.4 64.4
Orders outstanding(Billion yen)
72.6 71.9 74.4 67.3 67.3 69.7 68.0 68.7 63.9 63.9 65.6 65.8 71.1 62.3 62.3
Real estate development(Billion yen)
- 0.7 1.2 3.2 5.2 0.5 0.7 1.4 8.9 11.7 0.1 0.8 1.1 6.6 8.8
Sales (Billion yen) 14.3 20.7 17.1 28.0 80.3 14.4 17.5 14.5 29.9 76.5 12.4 14.2 11.5 20.7 58.9
22.4 19.2 16.3 21.8 18.6 17.8 22.3 17.6 18.8 20.9 20.311.4
0.00.5 0.1
0.70.7 0.8
1.21.4 1.1 3.2 8.9
6.6
0
10
20
30
40
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
(Billion yen)
22
Plan
*“Net income” refers to “net income attributable to shareholders of the parent”.
23
(Million yen)FY18/3Actual
FY19/3
Actual
FY20/3
PlanFY21/3
(Reference)YoY
Sales 530,840 505,223 502,200 -3,023 539,900
Gross profit 96,077 76,235 66,100 -10,135 87,500
% 18.1% 15.1% 13.2% -1.9p 16.2%
SGAE 73,147 68,844 63,900 -4,944 69,500
Operating profit 22,930 7,390 2,200 -5,190 18,000
% 4.3% 1.5% 0.4% -1.0p 3.3%
Recurring profit 22,354 7,063 1,300 -5,763 17,000
% 4.2% 1.4% 0.3% -1.1p 3.1%
Net income (loss)* 14,819 -68,662 100 +68,762 14,000
(Million yen)18/3
Actual19/3
Actual20/3Plan
FY21/3(Reference)YoY
Sales 435,537 426,388 421,300 -5,088 445,000
Gross profit 76,406 62,961 51,900 -11,061 70,500
Operating profit 26,062 14,987 9,800 -5,187 25,000
Sales 76,587 58,992 59,700 +707 73,000
Gross profit 21,355 14,343 12,800 -1,543 15,000
Operating profit 3,663 -995 -1,700 -704 0
Sales 12,807 13,922 14,800 +877 15,500Gross profit -105 598 1,200 +601 2,000Operating profit -1,596 -846 -100 +746 300Sales 5,908 5,919 6,400 +480 6,400Gross profit 2,042 2,094 1,600 -494 1,500Operating profit -846 -1,346 -1,000 +346 -2,300
Adjust-ments
Operating profit -4,353 -4,407 -4,800 -392 -5,000
Results of Business Segments
*Gross profit/Sales
24
*17.5%
*27.9%
*14.8%
*24.3%
*12.3%
*21.4%
*15.8%
*20.5%
(Million yen)FY17/3Actual
FY18/3Actual
FY19/3Actual
FY20/3Plan
FY21/3Reference
Sales 421,342 435,537 426,388 421,300 445,000
Gross profit 70,142 76,406 62,961 51,900 70,500
Operating profit 23,009 26,062 14,987 9,800 25,000
Units under management(as of the end of FY)
568,739 570,672 574,798 577,000 580,000
Occupancy rate (average) 88.53% 90.59% 88.34% 85.20% 90.20%
Direct offices(as of the end of FY)
189 189 189 - -
Number of corporatesales section (as of the end
of FY)60 59 54 - -
Number of employees(non-consolidated, as of the end ofFY)
3,284 3,247 3,241 - -
of which, sales employees 1,701 1,546 1,494 - -
Main Indicators (Leasing)
*Gross profit/Sales *Figures for FY17/3 adjusted to new segments
25
*16.6% *17.5% *14.8% *12.3% *15.8%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
FY 2018/3 FY 2019/3 FY 2020/3 (Plan) FY 2021/3 (Reference)
Occupancy Rate Forecasts
We will resume tenant recruitment during FY March 2020, and aim to improve occupancy rates in FY March 2021.
Average forFY2021/3(Reference)
Average forFY2020/3(Plan)
Average forFY2019/3
85.25%
90.31%
88.34%
Average forFY2018/3 90.59%
26
Companies that Own Housing/Dormitories for Employees
Corporations are shifting from owning housing/dormitories for employees to renting, due to increasing burden of maintainingproperties. Due to revisions to the Immigration Control Act , we expect up to 350,000 laborers being accepted over the next fiveyears.
Foreign Workers in Japan
63.565.5
61.2
46.042.3
35.8 35.3
29.4
20.7
20
30
40
50
60
70
1993 1995 1997 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2018
*Excerpt from “Rousei-jihou” No.3911 (16.6.24), No.3957 (18.9.14) *Excerpt from “Labor status of foreigners” (Ministry of Land, Infrastructureand Transport)
(%)
486563
650 686 682 718 788908
1,084
1,279
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
(Thousand people)
Estimated Number of Foreign Workers to Accept
Industry Number of People
Nursing care 50,000~60,000
Building cleaning 28,000~37,000
Industrial material 17,000~21,500
Industrial machinery manufacturing 4,250~5,250
Electric utility/information 3,750~4,700
Construction 30,000~40,000
Shipbuilding 10,000~13,000
Car maintenance 6,000~7,000
Aviation 1,700~2,200
Lodging 20,000~22,000
Agriculture 18,000~36,500
Fishing 7,000~9,000
Food and beverage manufacturing 26,000~34,000
Food service 41,000~53,000
Total 262,700~345,150
27
Main Indicators (Development)
(Million yen)FY17/3Actual
FY18/3Actual
FY19/3Actual
FY20/3Plan
FY21/3Reference
Sales 80,321 76,587 58,992 59,700 73,000
Gross profit 23,124 21,355 14,343 12,800 15,000
Operating profit 5,786 3,663 -995 -1,700 0
Contract amount 92,852 87,628 73,325 62,000 78,000
of which, apartments and
other buildings87,592 75,905 64,495 42,000 60,000
of which, real estate
development5,260 11,722 8,829 20,000 18,000
Offices(as of the and of FY)
60 60 50 - -
Number of employees(non-consolidated, as of the end ofFY)
1,469 1,450 1,365 - -
of which, sales personnel 566 530 475 - -
*Gross profit/Sales *Figures for FY17/3 adjusted to new segments *For real estate development, contract amount = sales
28
*28.8% *27.9% *24.3% *21.4% *20.5%
71.5
59.6
36.2
55.0
4.1
2.9
12.4
10.9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
FY18/3 Actual FY19/3 Actual FY20/3 Plan FY21/3(Reference)
Real estate business (excluding Life Living)
Apartments, etc. (excluding Morizou)
Contracts Plan (non-consolidated)
Due to negative media reports, etc, orders have fallen after February 2019. We expect the same trend during FY March 2020,but will aim to maintain profits by strengthening real estate businesses.
(Billion yen)
Development Business Strategy
Completing repairs of construction defectsis our top priority
We will concentrate on explaining andfollowing up on existing owners
We will strengthen real estate businesses(towards funds)
Change in organization: 35 constructionoffices (formerly 50)
29
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
Reduction in SGAE
FY18/3Actual
FY19/3Actual
FY20/3Plan
73.1
68.8
63.8
Personnel-1.9 Advertise-
ment-0.8
Salesexpenses
-0.2Others
-2.0
4.3 bn yen reduction
4.9 bn yen reduction
Personnel-3.6
Advertise-ment-1.2
Salesexpenses
-0.3
Others+0.8
(Billion yen)
30
200
300
400
500
600
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar
FY10/3 FY11/3 FY12/3 FY13/3 FY14/3 FY15/3 FY16/3 FY17/3 FY18/3 FY19/3
Managed units (right axis)
Occupied units (right axis)
Occupied units by Group(Thousand units)
Managed and occupied units(Thousand units)
Individuals (left axis)
Corporate (left axis)
Students (left axis)
*Figures are as of the end of each month*Reference of p.63
Occupancy by Group
32
51.5%51.4%51.1%53.0%53.3%53.3%53.0%54.5%54.8%54.8%54.8%56.4%56.6%56.5%56.5%57.8%57.7%56.8%56.4%57.9%
37.4%37.4%37.6%36.8%36.8%36.8%37.0%36.0%36.0%35.9%35.9%34.6%34.6%34.6%34.5%33.4%33.6%34.2%34.4%33.7%
11.1%11.1% 11.3%10.2% 9.9% 9.9% 10.1% 9.5% 9.3% 9.3% 9.3% 9.0% 8.8% 8.9% 9.0% 8.8% 8.7% 9.0% 9.2% 8.4%
473 476 474 495 488 490 487 509 500 499 493 521 517 515 509 535 527 507 489 485
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
FY15/3 FY16/3 FY17/3 FY18/3 FY19/3
Student-occupied units Individual-occupied units Corporate-occupied units
*Figures are as of the end of each quarter*Reference of p.63
Shares of Occupied Units by Group
33
(Thousand units)
Other
Construction
Food service
Services
Staffing,outsourcing
Manufacturing
Retail
Shares of Occupied Units by Industry
Approximately 80% of listed companies* in Japan use Leopalace21. The suspension of recruiting new tenants into buildingssubject to top-priority investigations impacts tenant matching.
*Companies listed on the 1st and 2nd sections of the Tokyo Stock Exchange, regional stock exchanges, and emerging markets
(Units)
34
*No. of companies inparentheses
47,510 48,913 49,242 50,086 44,518
32,022 34,689 39,510 46,379 44,771
35,169 36,911 37,50738,438
35,462
40,878 42,837 45,03445,157
40,97316,635
17,50918,150
18,77716,676
44,39848,489
52,92058,293
52,920
45,96547,913
51,46051,932
45,323
262,577277,261
293,823309,062
280,643
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
2015/3 2016/3 2017/3 2018/3 2019/3
YoY +5.6% +6.0% +5.2%
(46,008)(47,217)
(48,609)(49,229)
-9.2%
(43,751)
-9.2%
-11.2%
-9.3%
-7.7%
-3.5%
-11.1%
-12.7%
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar
FY15/3 FY16/3 FY17/3 FY18/3 FY19/3
China S. Korea Taiwan Vietnam Thailand Other Southeast Asia Other
Leased Units by Foreign Nationals (Excluding Corporate Contracts)
*Reference of p.64
In addition to obtaining customers at 16 overseas offices, we are strengthening our support system for foreign customers after coming toJapan such as preparing customer services in 7 languages by overseas employees (220 as of Mar. 2019) at 7 domestic offices in theoverseas division. About 74%, or 15,000 units, of the nationality of foreign tenants with corporate contracts are distinguishable. A total ofabout 35,000 units are contracted by foreign tenants, meaning 7.3% of the total occupied units.
SingaporeOverseassubsidiary
Singapore
IndonesiaOverseassubsidiary
Jakarta
PhilippinesOverseassubsidiary
Manila
Myanmar 1 office Yangon
CambodiaOverseassubsidiary
Phnom Penh
ThailandOverseassubsidiary
Bangkok, Sriracha
VietnamOverseassubsidiary
Ho Chi Minh, Ha Noi
Taiwan 1 office Taipei
SouthKorea
2 offices Busan, Seoul
ChinaOverseassubsidiary
Beijing, Dalian, Shanghai,Guangzhou
19,519 as of Mar. 31, 2019(YoY +3.6%)
35
(Units)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar
FY14/3 FY15/3 FY16/3 FY17/3 FY18/3 FY19/3
(Offices)
Direct Partners
Direct Partners Total
Hokkaido 9 2 11
Tohoku 15 6 21
Kita-kanto 14 5 19
Tokyo metro 49 33 82
Hokuriku & Koshinetsu 13 8 21
Chubu 24 15 39
Kinki 25 10 35
Chugoku 11 10 21
Shikoku 5 5 10
Kyushu & Okinawa 17 19 36
Japan 182 113 295
Overseas 7 0 7
Total(Compared to March 2017)
189
(±0)
113
(-5)
302
(-5)
Leasing Offices
As of Mar. 31, 2019
* Overseas locations operating foreign real estate brokerage servicesnot included. (Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Myanmar, Philippines,Indonesia, Singapore)
36
Contests
Wall-art ContestWinners paint their work on the wallsof our showroom “Kagoshima-like Rooms”
Students compete in creating roomswhich best represent “Kagoshima”
Renovation PartySelf-renovation event. The concept of therenovation is “living with friends withoutinvesting a large amount of money”
In May 2012, Leopalace21 has started “my DIY” as a strategy for acquiring individual tenants. 44,951 contracts have beenacquired as of Mar. 31, 2019, and we will continue to promote the image of “Customize = Leopalace.” Since 2012, throughalliances with major security companies, security systems and cameras have been installed. Apartments certified as “SuperiorDisaster Prevention Leasing” since June 2017.
“my DIY”
Custom wallpaper for free on 1 wall. Thumbtacks,shelves, and scribbling on the wall is OK
No cost for restoring room to original state
More than 100 types of wallpaper to choose from,including patterns
Male-to-female ratio of 50:50, higher percentage offemales compared to overall occupancy (70:30)
37
Security Systems Installments
FY19/3Actual
Cumulativetotal
% oftotal
Security systems(units)
12,380 308,944 53.7
Security cameras(buildings)
1,586 14,364 39.1
Certified as “Superior DisasterPrevention Leasing”
Designs for “Miranda” and“Cleino” have met the criteria forthe certification of a “SuperiorDisaster Prevention Leasing”apartment.
T Card Plus (Leopalace Member)
L-Select Leopalace ShoppingShopping web site with manyeveryday-necessities. Productsmade specially for Leopalace21 arealso available.
Tenant services which overturn common practices of the leasing apartment industry are available through “MY PAGE,” anexclusive website for our tenants. A Leopalace21 original brand credit card has been issued since October 1, 2017, and tenantscan pay monthly rent via credit.
Website for Tenants: “MY PAGE” (from Apr. 2013) STB device “Life Stick”
Expand functions of internet service “LEONET”(started in 2002) through STB device “LifeStick” with AndroidTV
Installed in 461,610 units (about 80%) as ofMar. 31, 2019
Life Stick
L MOVIE
38
MY PAGE(Exclusive website for tenants)
Issued Leopalace21 original brandcredit card from October 1, 2017
Tenants can pay monthly rent viacredit
The only credit card in the realestate industry with “T Point”
More than 18,000 cards issued(as of Mar. 31, 2019)
LEONET my-room
IoT with “Leo Remocon”
Controlling appliances with asmartphone made possibleie. control AC from outside
Standardly equipped in all newlyconstructed apartments(after Oct. 2016)
Installed in 12,441 units(97.5%)
In order to enhance tenant services, Leopalace21 has expanded functions of its internet service and implemented an IoT devicewhich makes controlling appliances and opening locking with a smartphone possible. Smart stations with AI speakers will bestandardly equipped in new apartments, starting from those contracted after January 2018.
39
Smart Lock “Leo Lock”
Selected as “Competitive IT Strategy Company”
Remotely lock and confirm viasmartphones
Key cylinder replacements andkey handovers becomeredundant
Standardly equipped on all newapartments (completed afterOctober 2017)
Installed in 5,536 units (100%)
Initiatives such as “first facialrecognition system for rentalproperties” and “industry-first rentassessment system utilizing AI”led to selection
Promoted by METI and the TokyoStock Exchange
Open-type delivery locker “PUDO Station”
Industry-first open-type deliverylocker installed in an apartment
Contribute to the localcommunity by improving thelives of occupants andneighbors
Installed in 114 apartments,accounting for half of theinstallments by real estatecompanies Leopalace Cleino
Cerezo Palthy II
40
Roof-lease Solar Power Systems (from Dec.2013)
FY19/3Actual
Buildingsinstalled* 4,483
Generatingcapacity* 66.9 MW
Generated power* 77,475 MWh *Refer to p.68
Corporate Housing Agency (from Sep. 2009)
Leopalace Leasing CorporationProvides agency services such as finding rooms fromover 1.6 million, including Leopalace21 apartments, aswell as contracting, paying rent, and concluding contracts.
Small-claims and Short-term Insurance Business(from Sep. 2006)
Asuka SSISupporting all tenants’ life by providing insurances whichcover niche fields such as an insurance for furniture andfee of tiding up ruins when fire occurred.
Rent Guarantee Business (from Apr. 2007)
Plaza Guarantee Co., LtdProviding comfortable environment to all tenants byguaranteeing debts such as rents, common fees,restoration costs, etc.
Tenants
Paying “Rents”+
“GuaranteeFee”
PlazaGuarantee
LesseesPayment of
“Guarantee Fee”
Guarantee ContractsLease Contracts
Lease GuaranteeContracts
Group companies implement leasing-related businesses, as well as services to increase the competitiveness and profitability.
70,000 contracts (+18.6% YoY)
300,000 contracts (-7.7% YoY)
170,000 contracts(-7.8% YoY)
41
“Minpaku” Apartments
Provide first “minpaku” apartment in Ohta-ku, Tokyo,renovating a company-owned apartment
By obtaining know-how from this alliance, we will aim todevelop products with higher profitability
Leopalace21 provides a “minpaku” (private lodging) apartment in Ohta-ku, Tokyo, a special zone for “minpaku” businesses.We are aiming for full-scale entry into the “minpaku” business through operations by Leopalace21, as a “third option” of leasingin addition to general and monthly contracts. Initially we will operate minpaku at company-owned apartments, and will expandtargets as a measure to utilize vacant and old properties.
Leopalace Tokyo Kamata( 29.06㎡ )
Opened in Dec 2018: 3 buildings
Fukuoka (Fukuoka), Aichi (Toyota)
Planned to open in 2019: 15 buildings
Tokyo (Ohta-ku, Bunkyo-ku, Toshima-ku),Kanagawa (Yokohama), Aichi (Nagoya),Osaka, Nara,
Leopalace21’s “Minpaku” (image, candidate area)
Leopalace21’s “Minpaku” Scheme
Since operation is limited to 180 days per year under the PrivateLodging Business Act, we will rent out the remaining days as “monthly”contracts, utilizing a “hybrid operation (‘minpaku’ + monthly)”
*1. Method of attracting customers1st phase - OTA and private lodging/vacation booking sites
(Airbnb、Vacation STAY, etc.)2nd phase - Via Leopalace21 offices in East Asia, where 74.2%
of visitors come from
*2. Target properties1st phase - Company-owned properties2nd phase - Vacant/old properties managed by other companies
Private lodging agent
Booking and payment
Lodgers
Lodge
Submitbooking info
Maintenance,cleaning
Private lodgingadministrator
Private lodgingbusiness operator
Management outsourcing
OTA*1
(Online Travel Agency)
*2.
Construction Offices Apartments Constructed (FY19/3)
Of the 381 buildings completed nationwide, Tokyometropolitan area makes up 51.4% (FY18/3 : 56.0%),and the three metropolitan areas (Tokyo, Kinki, andChubu) make up 75.9% (FY18/3 : 77.6%).
(Buildings)
Osaka 2 offices (3)Kyoto 1 office (1)Hyogo 2 offices (2)
Tokyo 11 offices (18)Kanagawa 4 offices (7)Saitama 5 offices (6)Chiba 1 office(1)
Tokyometropolitan:21 offices(32)
Shikoku:0 offices(0)
Hokkaido:0 offices(0)
North Kanto:0 offices(0)
Chubu:3 offices (4)
(Aichi)
Tohoku:2 offices(2)
(Sendai, Kohriyama)
Hokuriku,Koshinetsu:0 offices(0)
Kinki: 5 offices(6)Chugoku: 2 offices(2)
(Okayama, Hiroshima)
Kyushu, Okinawa:2 offices (4)
(Fukuoka, Okinawa)
We will continue to promote sales activities in the three metropolitan areas (Tokyo Kinki, Chubu). We will also concentrate onfollowing up on existing owners.
43
Total 35 offices (As of May. 2019)( ): As of Mar. 2019
TokyoMetropolitan
196
Kinki54
Chubu39
Kyushu,Okinawa
38
Tohoku25
Chugoku18
Other11
Elderly care facilitiesApartments
Matching businessbetween land owners andcare facility operators,
addressing theincreasing number
of seniors.
Products addressingneeds of tenants.Apartments are bulk-leased and managedby Leopalace21.
Built-to-order houses Stores
Construction ofconvenience stores andrestaurants, as well ascomplex structures withhomes or apartments.
Construction of built-to-order houses and housewith rooms for rent, inwhich rent income can beearned.
Leopalace21 proposes the optimal plan fit for the unique conditions of each land.
Various land usage proposals, including management of vacant land and housing, as wellas support for sales
Others
Ideal Land Usage
44
“MIRANDA” “CLEINO”
New apartment brands “MIRANDA” and “CLEINO” announced in May 2015. The launch of two unique brands will strengthencompetitiveness and renew brand image. Leopalace21 apartments are standardly equipped with sound-insulating “non-sound system,”which drastically upgraded sound insulation.
45
WoodenV-model
Down
1/3
Steel
Down
1/3
Non-sound floor
Reducesnoise fromupper floors.Insulationimprovedtwo to threerankscompared toconventionalmodels.
Wooden
TLD-45
Steel
TLD-50
Sound-insulating walls
Improved sound-insulation qualityof walls, providingTLD-45 forwooden structuresand TLD-50 forsteel framestructures.
Down
15dBConstruction example
Cross section
Sound-insulating drainpipes
Installed as a measureagainst drainage noise.Decreases noise by 15dB compared toconventional models,providing environmentssimilar to “libraries ormidnight suburbs.”
Upgraded Sound Insulation with “Non-sound System”
Concept is “decorative.”
An apartment brand that proposes unique added valueand new ideas.
Concept is “plain.”
A “plain-type” apartment brand that fits and matches toeach occupant’s needs and lifestyle.
Since the fiscal year ended March 2012, Leopalace21 has started constructing buildings other than apartments. Elderly carefacilities make up the majority of the social welfare facilities constructed, but we are adding and diversifying products such aschildcare facilities.
Elderly care facility(Setagaya-ku, Tokyo)
Elderly care facility(Kokubunji City, Tokyo)
Elderly Care Facilities Childcare Facilities
46
Childcare Facilities
Nursery school(Kokubunji, Tokyo)
Disability group home(Yamato, Kanagawa)
Hotel and store(Shimogyo, Kyoto)
Apartment and supermarket(Setagaya, Tokyo)
Cram school(Ora-gun, Gunma)
Nagano-chuo SR, Nagano B
Toyama SR, Toyama B
Saku SR, Saku B
Morizou Club, Nagano B
Showa SR, Yamanashi B
High-quality SR with accommodations
SR with kiso-hinoki experience tour
Utsunomiya-nishi SR, Tochigi B
Mito SR, Ibaraki B
Kumagaya SR, Saitama-Gunma B
Maebashi SR, Saitama-Gunma B
Mitaka SR, Tokyo B
Makuhari SR, Chiba B
Morizou Club, Shizuoka B
Nagoya SR, Tokai B
Yokohama SR, Kanagawa B
Morizou Club, Niigata B
Omiya-kita SR, Saitama B
-47-
Branche Series
In addition to the luxurious homes made with kiso-hinoki wood built by subsidiary Morizou Co., Ltd., Leopalace21 has launched“○○” (maru-maru) Home, constructed using the SE (safety-engineering) method. Morizou Co., Ltd. has opened a new modelhouse in Omiya, Saitama in June 2018.Life Living Co., Ltd., a real estate developer operating in the urban areas of Tokyo,Nagoya, and Fukuoka, has been subsidized as of July 2016.
Free design is possible,such as spacious chambersand large windows, due tothe SE construction method
Adapts to changing familystructures by arranging floorplans
Apartments emphasizingdesign and functionality, fittingsmall or deformed land
Luxury custom-built by Morizou
“○○” (maru-maru) Home
H=under10m
Rent income
“TEN-FOUR CUBE” enables construction of four-storybuildings under 10 meters, which is generally the limit forthree-story buildings. By increasing floor space, rentincome increases 33% compared to normal constructionmethods. This is especially effective when floor-arearatio is not fully used.
In order to differentiate from our peers, Leopalace21 has started a new service called “Life-stage Support.” In addition,Leopalace21 established Leopalace Trust Co., Ltd. to support the asset succession of customers and strengthen consultingservices.
“Life-stage Support”
In addition to apartment management, Leopalace21 willsupport the management of various assets, such as lifeinsurance, equity, and cash
Sales personnel will periodically visit landowners tointroduce new services and information regarding assetmanagement
Three pillars
1. Asset formationLeopalace21 will assist in creating portfolios withassets such as real estate, insurance, equity, cash,etc.
2. Tax planningLeopalace21 will introduce specialists and offer thelatest information
3. Life planningLeopalace21 will help in vacation planning, offerbenefit programs, and host gatherings
Establishment of Leopalace Trust
48
Established to support the asset succession of customersand strengthen consulting services
Acquired the “investment-based trust company” licensefrom the Financial Services Agency in May, 2018 (the 2nd
company among real estate industry)
Mainly handling land trusts and real estate managementtrusts
Company Name Leopalace Trust Co., Ltd.
Address 2 Chuo, Nakano-ku, Tokyo
Common Stock 0.3 billion yen
Business
operationsInvestment-based real estate trust business
Main services
1. Land trusts2. Real estate management trusts3. Consulting regarding the above services
Date of salecommencement
July 2018
*Private residential homes include Group homes
Elderly Care Business
Elderly Care Business is positioned as a growth strategy area, planning to increase facilities and stabilize management to correspond to Japan’s agingsociety. There are 87 facilities as of December 1, 2018. Occupancy rates are steady due to measures which improve customer satisfaction.
50
(Million yen)FY18/3Actual
FY19/3
Plan
FY19/3
ActualFY20/3
PlanYoYCompared
to Plan
Sales 12,807 14,000 13,922 +1,115 -78 14,800
Gross profit -105 500 598 +703 +98 1,200
Operating profit -1,596 -1,000 -846 +749 +154 -100
Facilities as of term-end 83 87 87 ±0 ±0 87
Occupancy rate (Day-service) 72.8% 74.3% 72.6% -0.2p -1.7p 77.4%
Occupancy rate (Short-stay) 90.2% 92.9% 93.6% +3.4p 0.7p 96.3%
Occupancy rate(Private residential homes, etc.)
88.8% 92.5% 91.6% +2.8p -0.9p 92.6%
Domestic Hotels Business
Hotel LeopalaceSendai
Hotel LeopalaceSapporo
Hotel LeopalaceHakata
Hotels in Asahikawa, Niigata, Yokkaichi, and Okayama were sold during the previous midterm management plan, and 4 hotels with a totalof 542 rooms in Sapporo, Sendai, Nagoya, Fukuoka (Hakata) are currently under management. An annex of Hotel Leopalace Sapporoopened in October 2017, and rooms have increased from 86 to 195. Also, renewal construction works in the former building of HotelLeopalace Sapporo was completed in June 2018.
51
Hotel LeopalaceNagoya
(Million yen)FY18/3Actual
FY19/3
Plan
FY19/3
ActualFY20/3PlanYoY
Comparedto Plan
Sales 1,811 2,000 2,060 +249 +60 2,000
Operating profit -198 -850 -764 -565 +86 -90
Depreciation and amortization 281 400 400 +119 +0 400
Occupancy rate 84.1% 84.7% 83.1% -1.0p -1.6p 87.0%
Resort Business (Leopalace Guam – non-consolidated)
Arrivals in Guam, especially from Japan, decreased drastically due to negative reports in August 2017 concerning a missilelaunch planned by North Korea, which had a negative impact on occupancy rates and profit. An executive floor “Medallion Floor”in Leopalace Hotel (Guam) was certified as “L grade,” the highest rank given by JTB Hotel grade. Please note that the fiscal yearof Leopalace Guam is from January to December.
Leopalace Resort Leopalace Resort Country Club
(Million yen)FY2017/12
Actual
FY2018/12
Plan
FY2018/12
ActualFY19/12
PlanYoYCompared
to Plan
Sales 5,085 5,300 4,771 -313 -529 4,900
Operating profit -261 40 -432 -171 -472 -480
Depreciation and amortization 976 1,000 1,052 +75 +52 1,100
Occupancy rate (Leopalace Resort) 50.7% 55.9% 43.2% -7.5p -12.7p 51.8%
Number of arrivals in Guam 1,545,392 - 1,549,007 +5,017 - -
of which, Japanese 620,376 - 563,386 - 57,161 - -
52
Medallion Room
Busan
DalianBeijing
Shanghai
GuangzhouTaipei
Introduce Japaneseapartments
Foreign realestate brokerage
Both businesses
Bangkok
Ho Chi Minh
Phnom Penh
YangonHa Noi
Manila
Seoul
Jakarta
Sriracha
Leasing Business Overseas (16 locations)
Foreign offices, subsidiaries
South Korean JV “Woori & Leo PMC”
Established with South Korea’s largest residentialproperty management company
Woori & Leo PMC will provide South Korea’s firstsystematic leasing management services
Full-scale operations started after the local lawenactment on February 2014, with 2,083managed units as of Mar. 31, 2019 (+654 unitscompared to March 31, 2018)
Introduce Japaneseapartments toforeigners
Foreign real estatebrokerage targetingJapanese individualsand companies
Promotingbusinesses ofserviced apartmentsand serviced offices
Traditional
In the future
China Beijing, Dalian, Guangzhou, Shanghai
South Korea Busan, Seoul
Taiwan Taipei
Thailand Bangkok, Sriracha
Vietnam Ho Chi Minh, Ha Noi
Cambodia Phnom Penh
Myanmar Yangon
Philippines Manila
Indonesia Jakarta
Singapore Singapore
Leopalace21 will expand its leasing business overseas. In addition to introducing Japanese apartments to foreigners, we have started foreign realestate brokerage services in Southeast Asia targeting Japanese individuals and companies. Also, we have entered the Korean market through aleasing management venture with a local enterprise.
53
*Results of the International Business are reported under the “Leasing Business” segment
Type Location Starting date No. of rooms
Serviced apartment
Thailand (Sriracha) October 2015 8 stories, 72 rooms
Vietnam (Hanoi) August 2016 10 stories, 56 rooms
Cambodia (Phnom Penh) December 2017 14 stories + basement, 56 rooms
Serviced office
Philippines (Makati) 1 November 2015 49 rooms
Philippines (Makati) 2 April 2019 49 rooms
Myanmar (Yangon) April 2016 15 rooms
South Korea (Seoul) May 2018 20 rooms
Vietnam (Ho Chi Minh) June 2019 (Plan) 32 rooms (plan)
List of Serviced Offices and Serviced Apartment
Thailand(Serviced apartment)Room
Cambodia(Serviced apartment)
Philippines(Serviced office)
New office
In addition to introduction and brokerage of both domestic and overseas real estate, Leopalace21 have started construction andoperation of serviced apartments (3 buildings, 184 rooms) and serviced offices (4 locations, 133 rooms). New serviced office willopen in Vietnam in June 2019.
Hanoi
Seoul
54
Myanmar(Serviced office)Private room (for 10 people)
Acquired Enplus Inc. and made into an affiliate
Offering “RM Plus,” a total management service of globalpersonnel affairs
Targeting 250 client companies and 10,000 users in 5 years
Relocation Management Business
In addition to managing serviced apartments, Leopalace21 offers one-stop service concerning personnel transferring by acquiring Enplus Inc. andmade into an affiliate. Also, in response to the shortage of construction labor supply, we have begun supporting the acceptance of technical interntrainees by our partnering contractors (87 since July 2015), in cooperation with the Technical Intern Training Program (TITP).
In cooperation with TITP, we have implemented practicalconstruction training and Japanese language training ofVietnamese trainees, and supported acceptance to ourpartnering contractors
87 trainees employed as of Mar. 31, 2019 (18 traineesemployed by Leopalace21 since July 1, 2017)
Acceptance of Foreign Technical Intern Trainees
Practical construction training
Language training
On the job training
55
*Results of the International Business are reported under the “Leasing Business” segment
Cloud-typedplatform ”RM+Online”
• Managing personnelinformation of expatriateemployees
• Progress, datemanagement, and dataanalysis on cloud
• Enabling efficienciesand optimization ofmobility works
27.9 27.8
22.420.0
18.3
15.0
11.3%
9.1%8.0%
7.1%8.1%
9.3%
0%
10%
20%
0
10
20
30
40
FY14/3 FY15/3 FY16/3 FY17/3 FY18/3 FY19/3
No. of overtime hours (monthly average) Total
137 137113
144177 183
1 03
5
80 55
1.1% 2.9%
25.5%23.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
0
100
200
300
FY14/3 FY15/3 FY16/3 FY17/3 FY18/3 FY19/3
No. of maternity leave No. of paternity leave % of paternity leave
31.7% 33.0%
70.1% 72.2% 74.1% 76.8%
0%
50%
100%
FY14/3 FY15/3 FY16/3 FY17/3 FY18/3 FY19/3
56
Ratio of Workforce Turnover,
Reduction in Overtime Hours Parental Leave
Paid Vacation Ratio External Assessment
*Selected as “Telework Pioneer 100” in November, 2018
57
Hote
ls,
Resort
&O
thers
Leopalace GuamResort Business
WING MATEBusiness travel
management
Leopalace SmileSpecial subsidiary
Eld
erly
Care Azu Life Care
Elderly care service
Corporate Data (as of Mar. 31, 2019)
Shareholder Composition (as of Mar. 31, 2019)
Group Companies (as of Mar. 31, 2019)
Company Name Leopalace21 Corporation
Head Office 2-54-11 Honcho, Nakano-ku, Tokyo
TEL. +81-3-5350-0001 (Main Line)
Established August 17, 1973
Paid-in Capital 75,282 million yen
President President and CEO Eisei Miyama
Operations
Construction, leasing and sales of apartments,
condominiums, and residential housing; development
and operation of resort facilities; hotel business;
broadband business; and elderly care business, etc.
Employees 7,600 (consolidated), 6,331 (non-consolidated)Authorized Shares 500,000,000
Outstanding Shares 244,882,515 shares
Shareholders 66,820
Le
asin
g
LeopalaceLeasingCorporate
housing agent
Plaza GuaranteeRent guarantee
Leopalace PowerPower generation
ASUKA SSITenant contents insurance
Woori & Leo PMCLeasing management
in South Korea
Leopalace21(Thailand)
Real estate brokeragein Thailand
Leopalace21Business Consulting
(Shanghai)Tenant recruitment¥
LEOPALACE21VIETNAM
Real estate brokeragein Vietnam
Leopalace21(Cambodia)
Real estate brokeragein Cambodia
PT. LeopalaceDuasatu Realty
Real estate brokeragein Indonesia
LEOPALACE21PHILIPPINES INC.Real estate brokerage
in the Philippines
Leopalace21Singapore Pte. Ltd.Investment consulting
Develo
p-
ment
MorizouCustom-built homes
Life LivingReal estate development
58
Enplus Inc.Relocation management
Inte
rna
tio
na
l*
Leopalace TrustLand trust, Real estate
management trust
*Results of the International Business are reported under the “Leasing Business” segment
Individuals and Other27.68%
Business Corporationsand Other Legal Entities
10.49%Foreign Corporations
38.96%
Financial Institutions14.73%
Financial InstrumentsBusiness Operations
(Securities Companies)7.70%
Treasury Stocks0.44%
Support continuous growth of core businesses in ways that furtherincrease corporate value while constructing a base for growth areas
Core businesses: Balance apartment supply and management, and enforce concentrationand diversification
Growth businesses: Move the Elderly Care Business and International Business into profit,which are less exposed to shrinking domestic population
Introduce ROIC as a key indicator
Review assert holdings with a view to enhancing asset and capital efficiency
Improve and strengthen distributions to shareholders
59
(Billion yen)FY18/3Plan
FY18/3Actual
FY19/3Initial Plan*3
FY19/3Actual
FY20/3Plan
Sales 540.0 530.8 553.0 505.2 502.2
Operating profit 23.5 22.9 24.5 73.0 22.0
Net income 14.2 14.8 15.0 -68.6 0.1
ROIC*1 - 7% 8% 3% 0%
Occupancy rate*2 89.5% 90.6% 91.5% 88.3% 85.2%
Orders 92.0 87.6 75.0 73.3 62.0
Share buybacks - 8.0 5.0 5.0 -
Total return ratio 50.0% 92.3% - - -
The Leopalace21 Group expects to reverse deferred tax assets during the span of the “Creative Evolution 2020” medium-termmanagement plan; management indicators are calculated based on normalized earnings that exclude one-off gains or losses.
*1 Return on invested capital (ROIC) = Net operating profit after taxes (NOPLAT) /Interest-bearing debt + Net assets*2 Occupancy rate is the average rate during each fiscal year*3 Figures for FY19/3 Initial Plan are forecasted figures announced on May 11, 2018
60
(Million yen)
Q1
Apr – Jun
Q2
Jul – Sep
Q3
Oct – Dec
Q4
Jan – Mar
FY19/3
Actual
FY20/3
Plan
FY19/3
Actual
FY20/3
Plan
FY19/3
Actual
FY20/3
Plan
FY19/3
Plan
FY20/3
Plan
Sales 129,268 119,600 126,210 121,500 120,887 122,700 128,856 138,400
Leasing 111,847 101,200 107,178 103,200 104,326 105,900 103,037 111,000
Development 12,450 13,000 14,297 12,900 11,504 11,700 20,739 22,100
Elderly Care 3,360 3,600 3,509 3,800 3,567 3,700 3,485 3,700
Hotels, Resort
& Others1,611 1,800 1,224 1,600 1,489 1,400 1,594 1,600
Operating profit 4,120 -4,300 3,072 -500 -690 2,000 887 5,000
Leasing 7,214 -1,600 4,966 1,900 2,133 4,100 674 5,400
Development -891 -800 -410 -1,100 -1,317 -800 1,623 1,000
Elderly Care -366 -200 -137 100 -203 0 -139 0
Hotels, Resort
& Others-612 100 -227 -200 -204 -400 -301 -500
Quarter Comparison
61
Results for Leopalace21 and Major Subsidiaries
62
(Million yen)FY18/3Actual
FY19/3
Initial Plan*
FY19/3
Actual YoYCompared
to Plan
Leopalace21Sales 505,849 523,700 477,834 -28,015 -45,866
OP 21,347 21,900 5,561 -15,785 -16,339
Leopalace Leasing(Corporate housing)
Sales 1,781 3,000 2,751 +970 -249
OP 482 700 566 +83 -134
Plaza Guarantee(Rent guarantee)
Sales 4,493 4,800 4,246 -247 -554
OP 295 400 544 +248 +144
ASUKA SSI(Tenant contents insurance)
Sales 1,611 1,800 1,811 +199 +11
OP 70 200 305 +235 +105
Leopalace Power(Roof-lease solar power)
Sales 2,905 2,800 2,884 -21 +84
OP 601 600 775 +173 +175
Morizou(Built-to-order homes)
Sales 4,768 5,200 3,904 -864 -1,296
OP 196 200 - 300 -497 -500
Life Living(Real estate development)
Sales 8,318 10,000 9,008 +690 -992
OP 1,063 800 964 -99 +164
WING MATE(Travel management)
Sales 2,978 2,400 3,136 +157 +736
OP - 51 0 164 +216 +164
*Initial plan was announced on May 11, 2018
FY14/3 FY15/3 FY16/3 FY17/3 FY18/3 FY19/3
Q4 Q4 Q4 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Units undermanagement
548,912 554,948 561,961 568,739 570,842 570,802 569,289 570,672 571,927 527,972 573,671 574,798
A. Occupied units 480,110 495,487 508,720 521,298 516,886 514,946 509,172 534,847 526,738 506,511 489,100 484,718
Occupancy rate(average)
FY84.6% FY86.6% FY88.0% FY88.5% 90.5% 90.0% 89.6%92.3%
FY90.6%92.6% 89.4% 86.3%
85.1%FY88.3%
B. Corporate-occupiedunits
246,272 262,577 277,261 293,824 292,581 291,085 287,629 309,062 303,701 287,615 275,786 280,643
Corporate share (B /A)
51.3% 53.0% 54.5% 56.4% 56.6% 56.5% 56.5% 57.8% 57.7% 56.8% 56.4% 57.9%
C. Individual-occupiedunits
179,036 182,142 183,008 180,617 178,802 178,016 175,872 178,643 177,072 173,189 168,462 163,318
Individual share (C /A)
37.3% 36.8% 36.0% 34.6% 34.6% 34.6% 34.5% 33.4% 33.6% 34.2% 34.4% 33.7%
D. Student-occupiedunits
54,802 50,768 48,451 46,857 45,503 45,845 45,671 47,142 45,965 45,707 44,852 40,757
Students share (D /A)
11.4% 10.2% 9.5% 9.0% 8.8% 8.9% 9.0% 8.8% 8.7% 9.0% 9.2% 8.4%
*Occupancy rate is the average value for each period (full-year or quarter)*Figures for units under management and occupied units are as of the end of the final month for the relevant period
Occupancy by Group
63
Units Occupied by Foreign Tenants (Chintai Contracts*)
*Figures are as of the end of the final month for the relevant period*Chintai contracts are long-term (more than one year) leasing contracts with monthly rent payments
Foreign customers make up 4.0% of total contracts (12.0% of individual and student contracts). Foreign nationals comprised ofstudents 61% and working-class 39%. Vietnam, the second highest in occupied units, is steadily increasing.By adding 15 thousand units contracted by corporate foreign tenants, totally about 35 thousand units are contracted by foreigntenants, making up 7.3% of the total occupied units.
64
(Units)
FY14/3 FY15/3 FY16/3 FY17/3 FY18/3 FY19/3
Q4 Q4 Q4 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
China 6,125 7,033 6,627 6,490 6,224 6,534 6,512 7,048 6,592 6,640 6,551 6,635
South Korea 1,298 1,336 1,447 1,479 1,459 1,478 1,512 1,594 1,622 1,602 1,625 1,604
Taiwan 658 747 949 951 899 873 946 1,005 994 990 980 947
Southeast Asia 1,833 2,859 3,116 3,708 3,875 4,307 4,646 5,339 5,614 6,121 6,160 6,362
of which,Vietnam
1,059 1,995 2,142 2,604 2,773 3,166 3,478 4,028 4,287 4,751 4,792 5,000
Others 2,013 2,391 2,874 3,199 3,230 3,356 3,536 3,862 3,872 3,882 3,888 3,971
of which,North America
462 499 567 610 600 620 620 657 640 635 617 657
Total 11,927 14,366 15,013 15,827 15,687 16,548 17,152 18,848 18,694 19,235 19,204 19,519
Managed Units (1,000 units) and Occupancy Rates by Area
65
(1,000units, %)
FY17/3 FY18/3 FY19/3
Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Managedunits
Occup-ancy rate
Managedunits
Occup-ancy rate
Managedunits
Occup-ancy rate
Managedunits
Occup-ancy rate
Managedunits
Occup-ancy rate
Managedunits
Occup-ancy rate
Managedunits
Occup-ancy rate
Managedunits
Occup-ancy rate
Managedunits
Occup-ancy rate YoY
Hokkaido 14 85% 14 89% 14 89% 14 84% 14 87% 14 87% 14 76% 14 69% 14 69% -18p
Touhoku 35 94% 35 94% 35 93% 35 92% 35 95% 36 94% 36 90% 36 86% 35 85% -10p
North Kanto 41 87% 41 87% 41 87% 40 86% 40 91% 40 88% 40 85% 40 82% 40 80% -10p
Tokyo metro 166 93% 167 90% 168 88% 168 88% 168 94% 169 91% 169 88% 170 86% 170 86% -8p
Hokuriku,Koshinetsu
41 90% 41 91% 41 92% 40 90% 40 93% 40 92% 40 87% 40 82% 40 79% -14p
Chubu 88 91% 88 90% 88 91% 88 91% 88 95% 88 93% 88 90% 88 87% 88 85% -9p
Kinki 81 91% 81 90% 80 90% 80 89% 80 94% 80 92% 81 88% 81 85% 81 83% -11p
Chugoku 39 94% 39 93% 39 91% 39 90% 39 93% 39 93% 39 92% 39 89% 39 88% -5p
Shikoku 15 90% 15 89% 15 91% 15 88% 15 92% 15 92% 15 87% 15 84% 15 84% -8p
Kyushu,Okinawa
50 94% 51 94% 51 93% 51 92% 51 96% 51 95% 51 91% 51 88% 51 88% -9p
Total 569 92% 571 91% 571 90% 569 89% 571 94% 572 92% 573 88% 574 85% 574 84% -9p
Occupancy rates decreased since the Company stop recruiting new tenants into rooms subject to top-priority investigations(about 210,000 units) .
91.7%
96.3%
93.2%
91.2%
88.9%
86.9%
93.7%
97.5%
94.6%93.8%
92.3%
89.5%
84.3%
97.5%
91.4%
85.4%
78.0%
72.7%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Total Under 5 years 5-10 years 10-15 years 15-20 years Over 20 years
2017/3 2018/3 2019/3
Occupancy Rates by Building Age (as of Mar. 31 of each year)
Occupancy rates of building age from 15 to 20 years and 20+ years, in which there are lot of rooms subject to top-priorityinvestigations, decreased drastically.
114(24%)
94(20%)
79(17%)
68(14%)
58(12%)
52(10%)
52(10%)
48(9%)
29(6%)
365370 384 412 438 457 469 487
456
478464 463
480495
509 521535
485
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
'11/3 '12/3 '13/3 '14/3 '15/3 '16/3 '17/3 '18/3 '19/3
Chintai (General) Monthly
1. Chintai (General) Contract
• No deposit or brokerage fee
• Monthly payments
• Contracts for more than one year
2. Monthly Contract
• Equipped with basic furniture andappliances
• No utility cost
• One-time payment
• Contracts starting from 30 days
Tenants by Contract Type Two Types of Contracts
Due to promotion of long-term tenancies, shares of short-term “monthly contracts” have decreased.
(Thousand units)
67
Tokyo-metro4,370
Chubu2,506
Kinki1,654
NorthKanto1,203
Kyushu,Okinawa
1,175
Chugoku961
Tohoku454
Others675
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
FY16/3…Q2 Q3 Q4FY17/3…Q2 Q3 Q4FY18/3…Q2 Q3 Q4FY19/3…Q2 Q3 Q4
68
FY12/3 Q2 FY12/3 Q4 FY13/3 Q2 FY13/3 Q4 FY14/3 Q2 FY14/3 Q4 FY15/3 Q2
Owner-invested Roof-lease (SPC) Roof-lease (Leopalace21 Group)
Solar power installments started in March 2011. Solar power systems are installed on 12,998 buildings as of March 31, 2019(roughly 59% of buildings that can be installed). Roof-lease solar power systems has started since December 2013.
Installments by Schemes
Schemes Start FY18/3 FY19/3
1. Solar power systems installed with apartmentowners’ burden
Mar 2011 7,245 buildings (90.9MW) 7,248 buildings (90.9MW)
2. Roof-lease solar power systems Sep 2012 5,750 (91.6MW) 5,750 (91.6MW)
a. SPC and other tie-up installments Feb 2013 1,256 (24.5MW) 1,256 (24.5MW)
b. Installments by Leopalace21 Group* Dec 2013 4,494 (67.1MW) 4,494 (67.1MW)
3.Mega-solar power plants utilizing idle land Sep 2013
Tomisato,Chiba
(1.7MW) Tomisato, Chiba (1.7MW)
Total: 12,995 (182.5MW) 12,998 (182.7MW)
(Cumulative total)
Installments by Area
(Buildings)
21.1% 22.6% 23.3% 25.0% 22.4% 21.1%
48.7%51.1% 52.1% 51.6% 55.9%
55.0%
20.2%19.5% 17.8% 15.0% 14.0% 15.3%
9.6% 6.4% 6.8% 7.0% 5.1% 5.7%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
FY14/3 FY15/3 FY16/3 FY17/3 FY18/3 FY19/3
20.2%26.3% 24.4% 26.9%
23.3% 23.0%
47.5%
50.4%48.7%
48.0% 54.5% 54.0%
21.9%
17.5%19.6% 17.0%
15.6% 16.1%
10.1%5.5% 7.2% 7.4% 5.5% 5.6%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
FY14/3 FY15/3 FY16/3 FY17/3 FY18/3 FY19/3
69
Based on number of buildings Based on monetary amount
City banks Regional banks Shinkin banks and Credit associations Agricultural/Fisheries Cooperative Japan Housing Finance Agency Others
Elderly Care Facilities “Azumi En” Area Disposition (87 as of April 1, 2019)
(Number of facilities)
Facilities which include elderlyhomes with nursing careservices
1 1 1 3 2 8
Facilities which includeresidential style elderly homes
1 5 2 2 2 1 13
Day-services and Short-stays 4 3 13 18 4 7 4 3 4 4 64
Group homes 1 1 2
Total 6 5 20 23 8 9 5 3 4 4 87
★Elderly homes with nursing care services, Day-services, Short-stays
Elderly homes with nursing care services, Short-stays
■ Elderly homes with nursing care services, Day-services
● Elderly homes with nursing care services
★ Residential style elderly homes, Day-services, Short-stays
● Residential style elderly homes
○ Group homes
▲ Day-services, Short-stays
● Day-services
Short-stays
Legend
“Azumi En Kisarazu” (the first elderly care facility managed by subsidiary “Azu Life Care”) opened on November 1, 2014.7 facilities opened during FY18/3, and 4 opened during FY19/3, totaling 87 facilities during the current midterm managementplan.
Gifu
Kasugai
Kakamigahara
Moriyama
SekigawaHorigome
Ota
TatebayashiHanyu
Kanuma
Utsunomiya Yaita
ShimodateYuki
KogaKoga-Chuou
Iwai
Nogi
Shinkoga
TsuchiuraKokinuYanagisawa
Showa
Minamisakurai
InaKitamoto
GyodaHigashi-Matsuyama
Honjyo
Chichibu
Ome
Hirasawa
Tatemachi Nakano
Yamakita
Tsurumaki
Tsukuihama
Ichihara
OyumiKatsuragi
WakabaIno
TakaokaNakazawaNamikicho
MisakiTakatsukashinden Tokiwadaira
SakasaiAbiko
Takamihara
KomakidaiSouka
Irumagawa
Sayama
Komuro
MizuhoMihashi
Goseki
Hanasaki-nookaAgeo
YoshikawaGamou
Yashio
Kisarazu
Shimizukoen
Katsu-tadai
Hamura
Tochigi-DaichoIsezaki
Gifu
Anjo
Aichi
Toyata
Hiratsuka
Higashi-Yamato
KamagayaNishi-Funabashi
●Sakura*
Takasaki
70
Maebashi
* Shizuoka Jul. 2018 opened* Mito Aug. 2018 opened* Iwata Sep. 2018 opened* Atsugi Dec. 2018 opened
Ohgaki
Yaizu
*
*
Utsunomiya-Minami*
FujiShizuoka
*Iwata
*Mito
*Atsugi
Shizuoka
(Million yen) FY18/3 FY19/3
Cash and cash equivalents 106,543 84,536
Trade receivables 7,626 6,908
Accounts receivables for completedprojects
1,957 1,709
Real estate for sale and in progress 3,523 6,582
Prepaid expenses 3,544 2,952
Current assets 130,167 110,757
Buildings and structures 42,705 40,542
Machinery, equipment, and vehicles 12,547 11,185
Land 63,638 49,221
Leased assets 16,028 11,732
Intangible assets 10,988 9,575
Long-term prepaid expenses 3,831 3,252
Deferred tax assets (long-term) 26,639 23,650
Fixed assets 206,527 180,705
Deferred assets 440 327
Total assets 337,134 291,790
(Million yen) FY18/3 FY19/3
Bonds and borrowings (short-term) 6,930 7,804
Lease obligations (short-term) 5,960 5,320
Accounts payable for completed projects 7,832 4,715
Advances received 39,964 34,635
Reserve for losses related to repairs - 50,707
Reserve for apartment vacancy loss(short-term)
- 8,826
Current liabilities 100,212 141,765
Interest-bearing debt (long-term) 28,712 26,421
Lease obligations (long-term) 12,226 8,501
Reserve for apartment vacancy loss(long-term)
3,044 3,902
Lease/guarantee deposits received 6,989 6,599
Long-term advances received 15,853 11,869
Long-term liabilities 77,483 68,687
Total liabilities 177,696 210,452
Common stock 75,282 75,282
Capital surplus 45,235 45,148
Retained earnings 37,839 -38,635
Total net assets 159,438 81,338
Shareholders’ equity ratio 47.2% 27.7%
Balance Sheets
Compared to March 31, 2018, assets decreased 45.3 billion yen (-22.0 billion yen in cash and cash equivalents, -14.4 billion yen in land,-4.2 billion yen in lease assets, and +3.0 billion yen in real estate for sales). Liabilities increased 32.7 billion yen (+50.7 billion yen in reservefor losses related to repairs, -5.7 billion yen in bonds, borrowings, and lease obligations, and -3.1 billion yen in accounts payable –others).Net assets decreased 78.1 billion yen (net loss of -68.6 billion yen, dividend payment of -3.0 billion yen, and share buybacks of -5.0 billionyen).
71
40.134.5 35.6 34.2
88.0
104.4 106.5
84.5
-0.33-0.44 -0.45
-0.62
-0.80
-0.60
-0.40
-0.20
0.00
0.20
0.40
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
FY16/3 FY17/3 FY18/3 FY19/3
(Ratio)(Billion yen)
Interest-bearing debt Cash Net DE ratio
NDE Ratio
*Net DE ratio = (Interest-bearing debt – Cash) / Shareholders’ equity*Lease obligations are not included in interest-bearing debt
*
72
As of March 31, 2019: 22.1 billion yen in borrowings (+2.5 billion yen yoy), 12.1 billion yen in bonds (-4.0 billion yen yoy)
83.0
98.2
60
80
100
Cash and cash equivalentsat end of period
-15.1
7.3
-7.2
-18.3
-2.3
27.3
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Cash flows fromfinancing activities
Cash flows frominvesting activities
Cash flows fromoperating activities
Cash Flows
(Billion yen)
(Billion yen)
73
*excludes 1.5 bn yenof fixed deposits
・Purchase of property -7.7 bn yen・Sale of property +10.0 bn yen・Purchase of intangible assets -1.8 bn yen・Proceeds from withdrawal of
fixed deposits +8.1 bn yen
・Loss before income taxes -64.8 bn yen・Reserve for losses related to repairs +50.7 bn yen・Loss related to repairs +4.0 bn yen・Impairment loss +7.5 bn yen・Deprecation, amortization of goodwill +13.5 bn yen・Decrease in accounts payable -8.1 bn yen・Decrease in advances received -9.3 bn yen・Increase in real estate for sale -3.0 bn yen
・Proceeds from short-term debt +1.0 bn yen・Proceeds from long-term debt +3.9 bn yen・Repayment of long-term debt -2.3 bn yen・Repayment of bonds -3.9 bn yen・Repayment of lease obligations -5.6 bn yen・Dividends paid to shareholders -3.0 bn yen・Share repurchase -5.0 bn yen
FY18/3 Full year FY19/3 Full year
2014/3 2014/9 2015/3 2015/9 2016/3 2016/9 2017/3 2017/9 2018/3 2018/9 2019/3
Individuals and other 20.7% 17.1% 16.7% 18.3% 16.6% 15.3% 20.5% 14.3% 13.9% 15.2% 27.7%
Foreign corporations 49.1% 46.8% 50.7% 55.3% 54.6% 55.3% 49.7% 55.1% 58.3% 54.2% 39.0%
Trust banks 17.6% 23.6% 23.2% 17.6% 21.0% 21.5% 21.5% 20.2% 21.5% 17.9% 12.5%
Financial institutions other than trust banks 1.7% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 2.1% 2.1% 2.0% 1.7% 2.0% 1.8% 2.3%
Business corporations and other legal entities 6.9% 6.6% 2.5% 2.6% 2.4% 2.4% 2.6% 2.5% 2.4% 2.5% 10.5%
Securities companies 2.4% 2.3% 3.4% 2.5% 1.7% 1.7% 1.9% 1.9% 1.7% 4.9% 7.7%
Treasury stock 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 4.3% 0.2% 3.5% 0.4%
0%
50%
100%
*Based on number of stock
Shareholder Composition
Institutional investors make up 51.4% of our shareholder composition, with 39.0% in foreign corporations and 12.5% in trust banks.
74
75
8490
9499
105112
117121 124 126 127 128 128 127 125 123
119115
111106
10297
9388
1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.5 3.13.9
4.85.7
7.1
9.1
11.0
12.7
14.9
17.819.2 19.6 20.2
21.4
23.725.1 25.7 25.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
50
100
150
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 2065
0-14 15-64 65-74 Over 75 Unknown % of Over 75
According to “Future Estimate of Population by Areas in Japan” (2018, Institute of Population Problems), total population will decrease from127.09 million in 2015 to 106.42 million in 2045 (-20.67 million, -16.2%). However, population in Tokyo will be stable, decreasing only 6%during 2015-2045 in the metropolitan areas (Tokyo, Kanagawa, Saitama, Chiba), meaning centralization of population is continuing. Inaddition, working age population (16-64 age) will also decrease from 7.72 million in 2015 to 5.58 million in 2045, accelerating the aging ofsociety in Japan. Japanese population
(%)
76
(Million people)
0-14 15-64 65-74 Over 75 Unknown % of Over 75
*Excerpted from “White paper on aging society” (Cabinet Office, Government of Japan)
14,457 16,785 18,418 19,342 19,960 20,254 20,233 19,944
9,63710,269
10,758 11,101 11,203 11,138 10,960 10,715
14,64614,474
14,342 14,134 13,693 13,118 12,465 11,824
4,1124,535
4,770 5,020 5,137 5,141 5,0744,9246,212
5,7795,044 4,510 4,123 3,833 3,583
3,35049,063
51,84253,332 54,107 54,116 53,484 52,315
50,757
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
2005 2010 2015 2020(E)
2025(E)
2030(E)
2035(E)
2040(E)
Singles Married couples
Married couples with child Single parents with child
Others
(29.5%) (32.4%) (34.5%)(39.3%)(37.9%)(36.9%)(35.7%)
(38.7%)
Number of general households are predicted to decrease, but single-person households are expected to increase.Single-person households in the working age population, which is also our target, is expected to stay from 10-12 millionhouseholds for the next 20 years.
Number of General Households by Category
(Thousand units) (Thousand units)
77
*Excerpted from “Future Estimates of Households in Japan” (2018, Institute of Population Problems)
Number of Single-person Households by Age
2,178 2,060 2,021 2,009 1,879 1,781 1,681 1,584
2,971 2,999 2,987 2,830 2,795 2,705 2,558 2,429
5,4446,745 7,157 7,479 7,774 7,809 7,577
6,968
1,898
2,2872,884 3,067 2,812 2,913 3,343
3,8411,967
2,693
3,3693,958 4,700 5,045 5,075 5,122
14,457
16,785
18,41819,342
19,960 20,254 20,233 19,944
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
2005 2010 2015 2020(E)
2025(E)
2030(E)
2035(E)
2040(E)
under 25 25-34 35 - 64 65-74 Over 75
1,663 1,673 1,665
1,343
1,420
1,5101,561
1,485
1,630
1,341
1,1801,226 1,213
1,1731,146
1,174 1,1931,249
1,285
1,036 1,039
775819 841
893
987
880921
974946 953
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
(Thousand units)
Leased units Condominiums House for sale Owner-occupied houses Company housing
New Housing Starts by Fiscal Year
Although new housing starts have been on an increasing trend after the Lehman collapse, starts increased 0.7% YoY duringFY2018 (April to March).
*Excerpted from “Housing Start Statistics” (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport)
①Consumption tax: 3% to 5%(April 1997)
FY1996: +9.8% YoYFY1997: -17.7% YoY
78
②Consumption tax: 5% to 8%(April 2014)
FY1996: +10.5% YoYFY1997: -10.8% YoY
YoY
Company housing +46.4%
Owner-occupied houses +2.0%
House for sale +5.2%
Condominiums +10.5%
Leased units -4.9%
①
②
New Housing Starts of Leased Units by Fiscal Year
Leased units starts during FY2018 (April to March) decreased 4.9% YoY, and leased units under 30 m2 decreased 7.5% YoY.
*Excerpted from “Housing Start Statistics” (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport)
(Thousand units)
79
YoY
Over 30 m2 -4.3%
Under 30 m2 -7.5%
240 262 274
178 186149 117 126 128 114 102 80 80 97 104 108 113 123 128 112 117
60 39 31 31 36 48 61 76 79 73
842821
767
582
687652
574 564
616
516
444426 418
442 455 459 467
518538
431 445
311292 290
321
370 358384
427 410390
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Leased units under 30㎡ Leased units over 30㎡
16.8%17.3%
18.0%18.8%
17.7%
18.8% 19.1%19.6%
17.0%
20.6%
23.3%
22.2%
10%
15%
20%
25%
1998 2003 2008 2013
Tokyo metro
Three major metro areas
Other
1,834
2,336 2,619
3,520
3,978
4,4764,600
12.4%
14.3%14.3% 17.4%
18.8%20.1% 19.9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013
Vacant Dwellings Available for Rent or Sale (Left)
Vacancy Rate (Right)
Number of vacant rental units in Japan has risen steadily. When a nationwide recovery in demand is unlikely; it will be importantto supply properties to areas where occupancy rates are high, to introduce differentiated products and to adopt measures thatenhance property values in ways that perceive tenant needs.
*Excerpted from “FY2013 Housing and Land Survey” (Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC))
80
No. and Ratio of Vacant Rentals Nationwide Vacancy Rates by Area
(1,000 rooms)
Net population inflows (“-” represent outflows)in 3-metro areas
*Excerpted from “report on internal migration in Japan derived from the basic resident registers” (Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications)
Net inflow of domestic migration into the three metro areas (Tokyo, Chubu, Kinki) continues, and Leopalace21 concentratesapartment construction in these areas with high leasing demand.
(No. ofpeople)
Construct-ion Offices
2016 2017 2018
Tokyo 1874,324(93%)
73,124(95%)
79,844(96%)
Saitama 6 21,702 22,181 24,652
Kanagawa 7 16,093 17,514 23,483
Chiba 1 13,163 12,711 11,889
Tokyo-metro
32125,282
(78%)125,530
(80%)139,868
(79%)
Aichi 4 8,968 5,710 3,112
Osaka 3 404 1,136 2,388
Kyoto 1 -1,028 -1,428 -2,536
Hyogo 2 -6,305 -5,947 -5,330
3-metroareas
42 127,321 125,001 137,502
(No. ofpeople)
Construct-ion Offices
2016 2017 2018
Sendai 1 615 1,399 1,979
Nagoya 3 5,934 3,750 1,868
Kyoto 1 -121 -1,385 -1,273
Osaka 3 8,846 9,453 12,081
Kobe 1 -550 -2,168 -2,331
Okayama 1 -667 -1,268 -1,538
Hiroshima 1 119 -359 -661
Fukuoka 3 7,287 6,986 6,138
Net population inflows (“-” represent outflows)near Leopalace21 offices
*Excluding Tokyo-metro area*Figures in parentheses represent ratio of population inflow between age20 to 39
81
(Rooms) FY17/3 FY18/3 FY19/3
Hokkaido 21,810 21,052 19,535
Tohoku 26,587 24,138 22,430
Kita-kanto 19,824 17,265 14,145
Tokyo metro 153,742 148,557 140,539
Hokuriku & Koshinetsu 17,629 16,185 15,123
Chubu 40,915 39,736 40,567
Kinki 59,866 58,442 58,058
Chugoku 19,819 20,551 18,893
Shikoku 8,789 9,097 7,865
Kyushu & Okinawa 58,294 55,332 52,938
Nationwide 427,275 410,355 390,093
82
New rental housing starts by region Leopalace21 completions by region
(Rooms) FY17/3 FY18/3 FY19/3
Hokkaido 0 0 0
Tohoku 352 258 314
Kita-kanto 346 220 128
Tokyo metro 4,267 3,797 2,258
Hokuriku & Koshinetsu 58 24 0
Chubu 536 521 461
Kinki 1,146 963 581
Chugoku 450 456 282
Shikoku 166 24 34
Kyushu & Okinawa 843 928 584
Nationwide 8,164 7,191 4,642
*Excerpted from “Housing Start Statistics” (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport)
New rental housing starts has increased nationwide, but Leopalace21 apartment constructions has increased mainly in the threemetropolitan areas (71.1% in FY19/3)
83
(棟)
Company A Company B Company CLeopalace21
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
Leopalace21 Company A Company B Company C
Central districts of three major metro areas(Tokyo + Aichi Pref. + KOK)
Other areas of three metro areas(Kinki and Chubu ex-Aichi Pref. + ex-KOK)
Other areas(Buildings)
74%3%22%
35%
13%
52%
44%
8%
48%
60%
6%
34%
Tokyo Metro
Chugoku & Shikoku
Chubu 1 (Aichi Pref.)
Kyushu & Okinawa
Kinki 1 (KOK*)
Hokkaido & Tohoku
Chubu 2 (ex.-Aichi Pref.)
Kita Kanto, hokuriku, Koushinetsu
Kinki 2 (ex.-KOK*)
*Kyoto-Osaka-Kobe
*Excerpted from “2017 Competitiveness Analysis of Housing Manufacturers” (JUTAKU SANGYO KENKYUSHO CO.,LTD.)
Private229,99076.9%
Public68,99023.1%
161,848 161,145
184,155
208,379
239,287
267,042
298,980
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
International Students in Japan
*Excerpt from “Result of an Annual survey of International Students in Japan 2017” (Japan Student Services Organization)
International students in Japan are increasing every year. 2015: +13.2%, 2016: +14.8%, 2017: +11.6%, 2018: +12.0%76.9% live in private housing (not set up by schools or government), leading to continuing leasing demand.
International Students by Housing
76.9% of international studentsin Japan live in private housing(+24,831 year-on-year)
Public housing are set up byschools, local government, etc.
(As of May 2018)(People)
84