Upload
amos-lamb
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
• Progress and Crisis (2004-2006 and 2007-2013)
• Closure & Reporting (2004-2006)• Systems and Simplification (2007-2013
and post 2013) • Monitoring & Evaluation (2007-2013)• Lessons learned and Future (post 2014) • Any Other Business and Conclusions
Content of the presentation
1
2
3. Systems and simplification (programming period 2007-2013 and
post 2013)
3.1. Simplification of EU funds implementation system
2
3
Flat-rate for indirect costs in ESF projects
• 6 MS (BG, CZ, LT, PL, RO, SI) already use flat-rate for indirect costs in ESF projects
• 6 MS (CY, EE, HU, LV, MT, SK) plan to use flat-rate for indirect costs in ESF projects (methodology isn’t approved yet)
3
4
• 7 MS (CY, CZ, EE, LT, LV, PL, SI) plan to use flat-rate for indirect costs in ERDF projects
• None of the above MS have the methodology for calculation of the ERDF flat–rate
Flat-rate for indirect costs in ERDF projects
4
5
Lump sums (simplification; methodology)
• 8 MS (CY, CZ, EE, HU, LT, LV, PL, SK) plan to use lump sums as the tool for simplification
• None of the above MS have methodology for
lump sums
• BG, MT, RO, SI do not plan to use lump sums as the tool for simplification
5
6
Unit costs (simplification; methodology)
• CY, CZ, EE, HU, LT, LV, PL, SI, SK plan to use unit costs as the tool for simplification
• None of the MS has methodology for unit costs
• BG, MT, RO do not plan to use unit costs as the tool for simplification
6
7
Simplification in national/regional EU funds
management system (I)
I Project selection and evaluation
7
LV, RO
All except CZ
PL
BG, CY, CZ, EE, HU, LV, RO, SI, SKBG, CY, CZ, LT,
LV, RO, SK
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Provideconsultations onfilling out project
applications
Introduceminimalistic
application formsand less
attachments
Opts for shorterlist of criteria
Enforce shortertime for project
assessment
Move to first come- first served
approach
8
II Project implementation
Simplification in national/regional EU funds
management system (II)
8
All except RO All except EE
RO
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Perform/plan to perform thesimplification in risk-based
controls
Perform/plan to perform thesimplification in monitoring
system and standartization of thereporting forms
Uses simplified publicprocurement for private
beneficiaries
9
Simplification in national/regional EU funds management system (III)
III Payments
11 MS (except MT) make advance payments available for beneficiaries Advance payments to public sector (including municipalities and NGO’s)(BG, CY, CZ, EE, HU, LT, LV, PL, RO, SK, SI) Advance payments to private beneficiaries (BG, CY, CZ, EE, HU, LT, LV, PL, RO) Some MS pay or plan to pay advance payments to the contractors
9
10
3. Systems and simplification
(programming period 2007-2013
and post 2013)
3.2. The role of the MAs in the implementation system
10
11
Verifications carried out by MAs
• In 6 MS (CZ, EE, LT, LV, PL) verifications are delegated to IBs (MA and CA not directly involved)
• In other 6 MS – BG, HU, MT, RO, SI, SK – mixed verifications
• In 6 MS (BG, CY, MT, RO, SI, SK) declarations of expenditure are verified by MAs
11
12
Methods of double financing management
2 (LV, SI)
1 (CZ)
4 (CY, HU, MT, RO)
5 (BG, EE, LT, PL, SK)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
IT system withinformation on major
sources of publicfunding
Stamping paymentclaims
Through on the spotchecks
Targeted (risk-based)approach
12
13
Specific guidelines for
monitoring revenue generated projects
• No specific guidelines for monitoring revenue generated projects in 7 MS (BG, CZ, MT, LT, RO, SI, SK)
• In CY, EE, HU, LV, PL there are specific guidelines used or being elaborated (contents calculation methods of funding gap, explanation what is considered as a revenue, rules concerning monitoring and reporting of revenues)
13
14
Number of employees of all working for EU funds
financed from TA
BG All 800 employees in the CCU, OP MAs, IBs, CA and AA receive bonuses from TA
CY Not known yet, currently proposals are being submitted
EE 330
HU 1000
LT Approx. 723
LV 558
MT 20%
PL
The total number working in MAs and IBs is 7519, including technical staff, finances services and legal assistance. From those 6838 employees is financed from technical assistance: 5652 in the framework of technical assistance priority axis in operational programmes and 1186 from TA OP
SI Approx. one third
SK Approx. 1450
14
15
TA financing (%) planned in 2009
1
0
50
10
0
75
10
55
45
70
30
80
40
15
5 4
10
2
15
3
20
10
5 1 4
10
10
10
10
2 2
15
3
10
3
10
10 2
0
5 10
25
15
30
5 5
35
5
25
25
4
10
5 10
35
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Staff 10 50 100 75 10 55 45 70 30 80 40
Research 15 5 4 10 2 15 3
Audit and controls 20 10 5 1 4 10 10
Evaluations 10 10 2 2 15 3 10 3 10
Publicity 10 20 5 10 25 15 30 5 5
Other 35 5 25 25 4 10 5 10 35
BG CY CZ EE HU LV MT PL RO SI SK
15