25
1 Representati on and the Political Process

1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern To which extent is it possible?

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

1

Representation and the Political Process

Page 2: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

2

Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens

themselves govern To which extent is it possible?

Representative (modern) Government by citizens’ representatives

The main principles: The state is a separate entity above society The state derives its authority from citizen consent State officials have an autonomy from society, but

are accountable to it

Page 3: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

3

What is the meaning of representation? 1. Rulers are elected, granted authority to govern -

but may not necessarily do what citizens want: unfulfilled promises

“painful but necessary” reforms 2. Rulers are not elected, but govern in such a way

that citizens do feel that their interests are taken into account

kindly kings, benevolent dictators seeking citizen support

Obviously, electoral democracy is a better form of representation

But major problems remain

Page 4: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

4

For instance:

washingtonpost.com: Big-Money Contributors Line Up for Inauguration

Page 5: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

5

1. Electoral mechanisms: how well do they communicate society’s demands to the state

2. Channels of citizen influence on the government between elections – in the policy-making process

3. The contents of policy Some of these problems can be solved through

improvements in the mechanisms of representation But there are strong arguments in favour of

reinforcing representation with robust institutions of direct democracy

Page 6: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

6

The political process

The political process can be described as the flow of political power

This flow never stops

It has its own patterns, reproduced over and over again in a systematic way

It moves through institutions, links, channels which connect society with the state

Page 7: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

7

Demands

Supports

INT

ER

ES

TS

Interest Groups

Political Parties

Media

Executive

Assembly

Government

Judiciary

LA

WS

AN

D P

OL

ICIE

S

Social impact of laws and policies

Elections

THE STATE SOCIETY

The Political Process

Page 8: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

8

Some interests have more weight than others. Such differences are reflected in every part of the political process

Some interests need the state more than others

Different interests need the state for different things

The flow of power has a dual nature

Power flows in two directions:

from society to the state

from the state to society

Page 9: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

9

Overall, the dominance of the society-to-state flow should be a sign of democracy: the government heeds societal demands

But if one looks at the unequal distribution of power, the picture looks different

Economically dominant classes exert dominant control over both flows of power

The rise of economic inequality in society is a sign that the political process works primarily for those at the top, creating a DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT

Page 10: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

10

Interest Groups and Interest Articulation

The basic actor in the political process is the individual citizen

The range of individual political impact -

From letters to MPs and newspapers

To being a Bill Gates – or a Prime Minister’s close friend

But most individuals can have any impact only by acting through interest groups – created to articulate (formulate and express) group interests

In modern societies, they are numerous

They vary in structure, goals, style, financing, support base

Page 11: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

11

4 main types of interest groups*

ANOMIC NONASSOCIATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL ASSOCIATIONAL

--------------------------------*See Gabriel Almond, Bingham Powell et al., Comparative Politics Today, 8th edition, Longman, 2003, Chapter 4

Page 12: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

12

ANOMIC GROUPS

Spontaneous (more or less) formations which arise to respond to a specific issue, usually in a crisis – demonstrations, riots

Not well-organized or sustained -

but may trigger off revolutions…

Can be created by organized groups

Page 13: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

13

NONASSOSIATIONAL GROUPS

Like anomic groups, not well-organized

Unlike anomic groups, are based on common identities, such as ethnicity, region, religion, occupation, etc.

Can be very large (ethnic communities in Canada) – or very small (residents of a village)

Page 14: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

14

INSTITUTIONAL GROUPS

Formal groups created for the purpose of influencing government policy

Mostly elite groups, are created by people possessing significant social power - businessmen, military officers, bureaucrats, politicians, the clergy

Possess large resources – financial, organizational, etc.

Often have direct channels of influence on policy

Page 15: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

15

ASSOCIATIONAL GROUPS

Created to represent on a sustained basis diverse social interests – trade unions, business sectors, ethnic, religious, civic groups, etc.

They lobby, finance election campaigns, put out their message through the media

A strong civil society is characterized by the existence of strong, well-organized non-elite associational groups which exert real influence on the political process

Page 16: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

16

How interest groups act and interact

3 main interest group systems:

Pluralist – free interplay between the groups

Democratic corporatist – systematic, organized coordination, with involvement of government officials

Controlled – in authoritarian states, have no freedom of action, closely controlled by ruling parties and bureaucracies (authoritarian corporatism)

Page 17: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

17

Channels used to transmit demandsLegal access channels:

Personal connections

Mass media

Political parties

Legislatures

Government bureaucracies

Protest demonstrations, strikes

Coercive methods:

Protest demonstrations, strikes

Boycotts

Riots

Terrorism

Coup d’etat

Page 18: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

18

Interest Aggregation

The process through which demands are translated into policy proposals

The key pre-modern (feudal) mechanism for IA is

the patron-client network (the crony system):

who knows whom, who is obliged to whom, who serves whom – personal, informal, and flexible tools of power

In modern democracies, generally considered ineffective. Rule of law, active citizenry, media freedom, competitive elections limit the usability of cronyism.

Page 19: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

19

The main modern IA mechanism is the political party. Some interest groups (institutional and associational) also perform IA tasks.

But patron-client networks have not disappeared from modern democracies

They continue to serve as unofficial - but not necessarily illegal - mechanisms interlocking with official institutions

When a patron-client network is used to break the law, this is called corruption. But the lines between the legal and the illegal are often blurred

Page 20: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

20

Political Party

An interest group seeks to influence the state

A political party seeks to capture control of the state

Functions of political parties:

provide links between the rulers and the ruled

formulate programs to govern society

help organize the process of policy-making

recruit and train citizens for political leadership roles

How are political parties created?

Page 21: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

21

1. BY COMPETING ELITES

The first parties, usually created in early parliaments, were elite factions with narrow popular bases, divided by ideology and interest, fighting each other for power

With the rise of democracy, they are forced to reach out into broader society to seek voter support

Example of an elite party which successfully adapted to mass politics – the British Conservative Party

Page 22: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

22

2. BY CIVIL SOCIETY

Organized by citizen activists, interest groups seeking to reduce the power of elites - or overthrow the elites altogether

The influence of these mass parties comes from the numbers of their supporters. They are interested in mass participation, and their programs are built around popular demands

NOT ALL MASS PARTIES ARE DEMOCRATIC -

TOTALITARIANISM IS A FORM OF MASS POLITICS

Page 23: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

23

2 basic types of party systems:

Competitive (in democracies)

Non-competitive (in authoritarian states)

In non-competitive systems, one party rules, allowing no challenges to its control of the state

Competitive:

One-and-a-half party systems (Japan until recently)

2-party systems (USA, also Canada)

Multiparty systems (most European states)

Page 24: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

24

Parties in government

In one-party authoritarian systems, the party, organized as a military-type command structure, controls both state and society

In two-party systems, the majority party has a high degree of control over government

In multiparty systems, government is often formed on the basis of several parties (bloc, coalition). Differences between parties in a coalition may undermine the government

Page 25: 1 Representation and the Political Process. 2 Democracy Direct (historically earlier form): citizens themselves govern  To which extent is it possible?

http://www.wegovern.ca/

25